#teamblocked

[siryouarebeingmocked]

souf-v-staff-rematch: Hitting women is always wrong, no matter what argument you make.

People, including me: Men should be permitted to hit women in self defense, just like with men. Sometimes those women are armed and dangerous.

Me: In fact, here’s an example of a woman who stabbed a larger man to death with just a nail file.

Idiots: Well, obviously, people who say “don’t hit women” don’t include self-defense! Wasn’t that obvious from their complete lack of qualifiers?

souf-v-staff-rematch: [blocks me]

souf-v-staff-rematch: [spends three posts begging strangers for validation without a single actual criticism of the argument]

I also like how Souf describes himself as “handsome and funny” and not, y’know, “smart”.

You know the funniest part?

People like Souf take "I think everyone should have the right to actively defend themselves, even against women", and turn it into, "oh, so you're a man waiting for the slightest excuse to hit a woman?"

They obviously can't argue against the actual point without looking like like (more of) a sexist jerk, and they automatically think of the person as "threat to women", which translates to “man” by default.

Even though loads of women hold that exact same view.

Including one in the thread.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

"I feel like people are ignoring things about the NAtive American genocide!"

"Actually, it wasn't really a genocide, mostly."

OP: [turns off reblogs]

OP: [blocks everyone who disagrees]

Reminder that Native Americans repeatedly traded with and teamed up with Europeans to gain advantages over other NAtive Americans.

Also, OP has me pre-blocked. Big surprise, right?

Okay, but that still doesn't actually make the white people responsible. Assuming you're even right. When I looked for a source, Joseph Felt actually said it was a tragedy.

You're admitting it wasn't genocide, and have switched to just point-scoring.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

People rarely talk about “institutional” misandry, they just say it’s misandry or sexism against men.

When they do talk about institutional/system issues, it’s things like gendered rape/abuse laws and support.

Which, um, feminists heavily contribute to by calling both “violence against women” (by men). And claiming all domestic abuse must be out of misogyny.

You can find feminists having protests and sending death threats when men OR women try to talk about women’s issues. Including other feminists, sometimes.

Heck, when India tried to make their sexual assault laws gender-neutral a decade ago - to include men at all - local women’s advocates successfully stopped them. 

The spokesperson was a woman.

>

a 100% male congress passing legislation applying the conscription provision to an free and abio-bodied male citizens before women were even allowed to vote 

And it continued since then. In fact, it’s still legal.

Women got the right to vote in America a century ago.

And you specifically used the present tense. Not something that happened before your grandma was born.

Almost like you chose that specifically because it was “safe” to blame exclusively on men!

Incidentally, the first Federal draft was the result of the Selective Service Act, 1917. Women got the 19th Amendment in 1920.

A whole three years.

You’re cutting that one a bit close, aren’t you?

Also, things can be both classism and sexism.

Meanwhile, in the UK, the White Feather Girls who shamed men into WW1 were often also suffragates who couldn’t vote.

Complete strangers could compel men into risking their lives.

Somehow, I don’t think that fits the narrative.

Especially when men didn’t have universal suffrage either.

>but feel free to derail this into, like, male domestic violence victim statistics or something since that's all your blog indicates you're capable of

“Feel free to derail this into something that’s directly relevant to the discussion I started, while I act smug toward a strawman of your position I made up. And then block you. Because I’m a coward.” -mamaterf, apparently

How are male DV victims not an example of systemic sexism when “these idiots” often explicitly say it is? 

When men in any class are often assumed to be rapists or abusers based on just a women’s accusation?

What next, are you going to cherry-pick some rich guys who got off, and assume every man is that lucky? That one’s a classic.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Turns out being "non-peaceful" just means "being angry and complaining".

Who knew?

And apparently when Trump explicitly said they would protest "peacefully and patriotically", and some idiots started a riot despite that, it's a "coup".

Honestly, I'm surprised BB didn't mention the "insurrection".

Seriously, BB is often blatantly wrong about things. Certainly not proving the "smart people wear glasses" stereotype.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I love how I got this joker so salty he(?) had to reblog himself after blocking me to seethe and strawman and beg his followers for validation.

I especially like the part where apparently I'm...a monarchist? Because (he thinks) I'm from a commonwealth country?

That's not how it works!

Not socialist in a “I won’t have to work” type of way but socialist in a “I’ll still be working but I won’t be worried I won’t make the rent” type of way. In a “billions won’t be hoarded by one person” type of way. In a “janitors, fast-food workers, child care workers, preschool teachers, hotel clerks, personal care and home health aides, and grocery store cashiers, will live comfortably” type of way. In a “the sick and elderly will be cared for” type of way. In a “no child should work” type of way.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Gee, I wonder why ComeradeOwl blocked @percistent​. It’s a real mystery.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I love the assumption in the tweet that the same men hold both opinions. Many men - and women - are simply against all sexism. 

Including me.

Of course, by the same lolgic, it’s okay to tar all women with the same brush as the minority who do bad things.

>Cooking is womens work, but only in the home, the majority of professional Chefs are male.

How is that sexism? Professional chefery is a lot different from cooking for yourself or your family. 

Also, aren’t bakeries often run by women?

>Tending to the sick is women's work, but only in the home, the majority of doctors are male.

...Who says women are supposed to tend to the sick? If the sick is a kid, maybe. And if the stay at home dad is a man, he’s expected to do it.

And, again, how is a gender disparity necessarily sexism? Women are still more likely to be nurses. And they outnumber doctors.

The gender ratio is 60/40 male/female. That’s not a huge majority.

By this lolgic, feminism’s majority of women would be evidence of sexism against men. In fact, feminism is rarely concerned with any field where women dominate.

>Caring about clothes and fashion is stupid and girly, but only at a consumer level, most fashion designers are male.

And are usually designing for women, because women generally care more about fashion and appearance. So women buy more clothes.

Is this what you’ve been reduced to? The fact that a tiny minority of men are fashion designers is not some sort of hypocrisy on the part of men that aren’t.

Just like the doctor thing.

>Women is the sex trade are disgusting and basically subhuman, but males are the majority of pimps and johns. 

Turns male hookers are treated even worse, and neither pimps or johns are exactly lauded as heroes.

You did notice that all of those are still illegal, right?

Also, pimps are often employees of the “sex trader” women. Think agent/bodyguard, not slave driver.

>Men are the ones who 'do the dirty work' but most men pitch a fit if their wives ask them to change their babies diaper.

1. Citation needed.

https://warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/pressreleases/research_punctures_modern/

https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/fathers-day-approaches-dads-young-children-say-they-do-their-fair-share-chores-including-changing

2. Men are expected to take out the garbage, do home and car repairs, including plumbing, etc. When it comes to actual jobs, men literally do the dirty work.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I like how the first point carefully leaves out the "they let you do it" part, and the complete lack of evidence that those incidents actually happened.

BTW, remember when a woman made allegations against Biden, and the left collectively ignored them just to get him the Big Seat?

I also like how nobody in three and a half years has managed to say what Trump said that supposed incited the riot, especially since he explicitly said they were supposed to 'protest peacefully".

And the third point is literally jus the fearmongering about the 2025 Project, which was not by Trump, and not endorsed by Trump, but you softened up the reader's confirmation bias with the first one.

And what a shock, OP has me pre-blocked.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

And how many will get mad at you if you say so.

EDIT: Yet another post where I agree with something perfectly reasonable that OP said, and they blocked me because of Shinigami Eyes.

Which is ironic, in this context.

It's so wild how many grown adults can't grasp such a basic concept like "if you are nicer to strangers they will usually be nicer to you in return"

[georgiapeach30513]

#teamblocked

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Also, what does “serves a white audience” even mean, exactly? I’m a non-American black man, and I generally don’t care about the race of protagonists in my media.

The idea that minorities and women can only empathize with characters who share labels with them is actually pretty prejudiced. 

And factually wrong.

[veroverse21]

You weren’t respectful to those who ship Eraserjoke (or those who even like Mineta) by putting your negativity and whining about the ship in the tag and tags of the characters involved of the ship. We like to look at those tags and don’t want to see bullshit negativity and hate when we look. If you don’t have anything good to say about a ship then keep your content from appearing in the tags or searches.

Easy!

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Remember, mainstream progressive thinking doesn't treat "misandry" or "androphobia" as real. The closest it gets is "toxic masculinity", which is usually treated as something different from "sexism", which is supposedly something that happens just to women. So admitting sexism against trans men is a thing would be way too close to admitting sexism against men in general is a thing, and that kind of messes with many people's binary idea of "man as oppressor".

EDIT:

What a shock. For all OP's talk, they immediately looked for an excuse to dismiss my opinion the second I criticized progressives. And also supports political violence against Crimethinkers, which is a textbook definition of terrorism.

I don't think OP has as much self-awareness or difference from the people they're criticizing as they'd like to think.

"transandrophobia isn't real bc men aren't oppressed for being men, only for other marginalizations they face"

okay well i am a brown disabled trans masc person and i'm telling you i DO experience oppression on the basic of being what ppl perceive as me "being a man."

what is it when Black men are treated like violent, scary criminals? it's racism, yes, but it's also a specific form of racism that applies especially to Black MEN.

what is it when Indigenous men are expected to be "noble s*vages" in a way that is distinct from the way Indigenous women and nonbinary ppl are categorized?

what is it when disabled men are explicitly harmed for being weak or "not real men?" what is it called? is it JUST ableism? if so, why does gender continuously play a part in the harm?

what is it when trans men are assaulted or killed for not being "man enough?" what do we get to call transphobia that we, specifically, face for being masculine?

what about my fellow Black and brown trans dudes who hesitated to transition for fear of being fucking killed by cops? or are they just imagining it too?

why is it that when WE acknowledge our pain and oppression, we're suddenly just men and apparently aren't smart enough to know our own experiences? why do you get to tell me these things aren't real?

y'all will really talk about how patriarchy hurts everyone and then turn around and tell afab ppl whose genders you think are too privileged to sit down and be quiet. as if we didn't hear that from everyone else in our lives since birth. as if this isn't aimed at us SPECIFICALLY bc we're not the group YOU think deserves safety and respect. fuck you.

[chaoticgouda]

maybe we should stop acting like blocking someone you’ve never met is a bad thing.

[arcenciel-par-une-larme]

"By the nine divines! An unclean person!! Ugh, how appalling!!! GET AWAY FROM ME, YOU FILTHY LEPER, LEST YOU CONTAMINATE MY ECHO CHAMBER WITH YOUR DISGUSTING BELIEFS WHICH YOU DIDN'T EVEN EXPRESS UNDER MY POST!!!!"

@superimaginationcreativity Did tokyogutz block you as well? 😹

[the-salty-scythe-meister]

Lmao

Anyway, antis still wouldn't know a legit pedo if it bit them in the ass