#take-minakata

[purseowner4thequalityanimation]

[shinmegamitensei]

タケミナカタ - 真・女神転生V 日めくり悪魔 Vol.122

[larrue]

[garbagedetective-blog]

take-minakata replied to your post “do u ever just want to express ur opinions on romance but tumblr is...”

express away friend, i shall listen

but why cant everyone listen tho tumblr preaches about bein an all-inclusive community but most people deny the existence of aromantic people because "oh no there cant be anyone in the world who doesnt want a romantic relationship because its the pinnacle of human happiness wow u must be so lonely and sad"

[yumei50]

I can't believe that Guncannon-sama is Armless guy's wife

[primaeros]

Take-Pannacotta

[seittilelu]

[purseowner4thequalityanimation]

In NINE, Take-Mikazuchi’s model is reused for Take-Minakata’s model. This may be a deliberately ironic choice, as in myth the two are rivals with Minakata being defeated by Mikazuchi.

Take-Mikazuchi’s model is a recreation of his Devil Summoner design. This design has continuity with his previous Shin Megami Tensei design, namely the identical hairstyle and the red skintone. The pose from the Devil Summoner design is used for both demons in NINE.

Take-Minakata’s model takes the horns and overall palette from his Shin Megami Tensei II design.

Thanks to @veskscans for the design scans.

[hylean]

take-minakata replied to your photo: aww yes badass wand can’t wait to be sorted ...

omfg I had that choice too but I didn’t misclick so I’m in slytherin I’m crying I want ravenclaw

i'M SCREAMING I'M SO PISSED RIGHT NOW UGHHHHHHH

i made 2 accounts tho and i'll just use the other one bc it has a better username anyway \m/ i'll just LIE

[meenaw]

aaamaaa replied to your post: OKAY IM NOT EVEN FUCKING KIDDING IM GOING TO TRY...

It’s been nice meeting you. Goodbye. We shall make a smashing funeral for you.

..... thanks, I think I'll need it

roomnumber203 replied to your post: OKAY IM NOT EVEN FUCKING KIDDING IM GOING TO TRY...

Where did you get it I want to watch it and scar myself for life as well

I... kinda want to die alone uhh

aradiadesu replied to your post: OKAY IM NOT EVEN FUCKING KIDDING IM GOING TO TRY...

ENYA. DON’T I FUCKING SWEAR

.... It's kinda too late uhhhhhh ಥ ‿ ಥ;;;

moriarrty replied to your post: OKAY IM NOT EVEN FUCKING KIDDING IM GOING TO TRY...

mmm den er sexy

hva er det du sier, den er jo pervers jo!!!1!!11 :-(

take-minakata replied to your post: OKAY IM NOT EVEN FUCKING KIDDING IM GOING TO TRY...

oh m, goD fdont do itT

its to olate ma n ( ﾟдﾟ)

[ostolero]

take-minakata started following you

youre probably looking for the geromy blog

http://newfriendascends.tumblr.com/

[myjourneymythoughts]

why can't you be racist towards whites can you also not be sexist towards males

No.

Here's an explanation of why:

Prejudice is an irrational feeling of dislike for a person or group of persons, usually based on stereotype.  Virtually everyone feels some sort of prejudice, whether it’s for an ethnic group, or for a religious group, or for a type of person like blondes or fat people or tall people.  The important thing is they just don’t like them — in short, prejudice is a feeling, a belief.  You can be prejudiced, but still be a fair person if you’re careful not to act on your irrational dislike.

Discrimination takes place the moment a person acts on prejudice.  This describes those moments when one individual decides not to give another individual a job because of, say, their race or their religious orientation.  Or even because of their looks (there’s a lot of hiring discrimination against “unattractive” women, for example).  You can discriminate, individually, against any person or group, if you’re in a position of power over the person you want to discriminate against.  White people can discriminate against black people, and black people can discriminate against white people if, for example, one is the interviewer and the other is the person being interviewed.

Racism, however, describes patterns of discrimination that are institutionalized as “normal” throughout an entire culture. It’s based on an ideological belief that one “race” is somehow better than another “race”.  It’s not one person discriminating at this point, but a whole population operating in a social structure that actually makes it difficult for a person not to discriminate.

And no, you cannot be sexist against men. Sexism is defined as beliefs which hold one sex superior to the other thereby justifying sexual inequalities. So nope, because men hold more power than women. Women are viewed as these gentle little flowers. We get paid shit, treated like shit, have laws that govern our bodies, etc. No one sees women as superior.

There is some intersectionality there that I don't have the energy to deal with right now. Look it up on your own. And don't use Wikipedia for this. Look up sociological studies of sexism.

So there's your answer. White people will never be victims of racism, straight white cis-men will never be victims of sexism, because they're held up as perfect and will never be thought of as less. At least that's my opinion on the sexism part. The racism part? Not opinion, fact.

[myjourneymythoughts]

you're a fucking racist and if you think otherwise I would direct you to your ending remarks on post/19709816629

OH MY GOD IT HAPPENED AGAIN!!!

How am I racist? For real? Do tell. Is it because your friend is white? Cause if that's the case, that she is white, she can't be a victim of racism X^D

[myjourneymythoughts]

when did I ever fucking say I agreed with her point of view. the only thing I've had to say is that you are ignoring what she's saying and only seeing what you want to see presumably to have grounds for an argument because idk social justice bloggers seem to really love to argue

First off, I'm not an SJ blogger. I'm a "Shut the fuck up racist, sexist, cissexist, homophobic assholes" blogger.

And no, I'm seeing what she's saying, loud and clear.

"Stop being offended by the word, don't react to it and it'll go away. I don't like to think in terms of race, sex, gender or sexual orientation. Why are you being so mean to meeeee? All I did was barge in on a conversation I has no place in to begin with and give my opinion that doesn't matter because I'm not from any of the cultures nor the ethnicity that was related to the conversation!"

Nope. Your friend fucked up. She was told REPEATEDLY that she fucked up. Had she apologized and shut her mouth when informed of said fucking up, it would've ended. Instead, she stayed on a post where she had no place and wasn't wanted, and proceeded to tell someone who has every right to be offended by the use of that word to not be offended by it.

Your friend was wrong, you're wrong, and back the fuck off my friend, sending anon fucking messages telling her to burn in an icy hell. How bout you fuck off outta here now with your defense of your friend's blatant fuckery and fuck ups? Cause honestly, you have no place in the conversation, either!

[myjourneymythoughts]

okay no she's saying stop reacting but then she says she knows it's romantic to the point of idiocy, and also she's not saying "screech you have to stop reactinG!!!!!!!!!!" she's saying if people stop reacting, the meaning will disappear. she's saying that IF that happens, the meaning will go away. she nEVER said you HAVE to stop reacting, she even said it's idiotic of her to think people will be able to. she just said good will come if people do that

Okay, you're obviously not reading the same conversation. And no good will come of people not reacting to it, IT WILL ONLY ALLOW RACISM TO SPREAD FURTHER!

How are you not seeing this?! Since when does ignoring racism make it go away?!

You both fail at fucking logic, for real.

[myjourneymythoughts]

okay you are missing bros point she's saying that she knows people won't ever be able to ignore the past of the word or stop reacting she says she's realizing that it's true but she's saying that IF it could happen which it COULDN'T, the word would lose all meaning she never got into this argument to defend the use of the word

No, she's saying "Why can't it just stop meaning things". That is exactly what she's saying. She's saying "Just let it go."

 i’m just saying that if we stop reacting to jumbles of letters as if they actually have any sort of power, the hope is that they��ll go away. i realize it’s romantic to the point of complete idiocy, but that’s really what i’m trying to say. once we stop reacting to words, hopefully people will stop using them. hopefully when the negative words are gone, we’ll realize that people are people and that none of this matters.

.....................................

the word needs to stop meaning things so that people can move on. the word needs to stop meaning things so that we don’t waste time killing people because of their race.

There's the crux of her argument. Stop reacting, and let it go.

Her entire premise is to "stop reacting". When you "stop reacting" the problem gets worse, because through inaction, racism and hatred are passively condoned.

So no, she's not say "IF" she's saying "STOP REACTING".