#synapsid evolution

[pixel-cherry-pie]

Speculative evolution side of tumblr I’m in need of your constructive criticism! I tried to speculate some dragons based on synapsids instead of more “regular” reptiles. But do they make any sense???? Pls halp! They’re loosly based on gorgonopsyds but I gave them wings in convergent evolution with the pterosaurs. I guess they shouldn’t be able to fly without air sacs in their body and hollow bones so I’m also guessing they conveniently evolved those as well.

I’m not entirely sure about the horns in general, because I don’t know wether or not they would make sense (I thought maybe could be an adaptation to protect the nose from cold winds and grew to be a communication display? Idk idk anything!). Should they actually be more scaly? More horned? I already know I’ll try with manes, cuz they might look nice in them!

Another thing that looks weird to me are the Feets. I can’t place myself where they look wrong. Please feel free to give me a heads up! I tried with a semi-plantigrade stance and took inspo from thylacines but clearly it ain’t it. (is it even a thing actually?) For the marine dragon I went with sturdier constitution and small wings, for water propelling (should they be even smaller???) and big, hollow horns for (possible?) echolocation. Strong limbs to climb cliffsides and find nice safe spots to nest and from where to dive for food. (on this note... would these dragons lay eggs or... what???)

Let me know what you think about it, I’ll be more than happy to discuss these very incomplete stages of speculation!

[typhlonectes]

Continental drift fossil evidence.

As noted by Snider-Pellegrini and Alfred Wegener, the locations of certain fossil plants and animals on present-day, widely separated continents would form definite patterns (shown by the bands of colors), if the continents are rejoined.

via: United States Geological Survey (USGS)

[deep-sea-scholar]

HE SKRUNKLE

[katborg82]

Lystrosaurus was a genus of synapsid that originated in the late Permian period some 250 mya, and was one of the few survivors of the most devastating mass extinction the world has ever seen. After around 95% of life on earth had gone extinct, Lystrosaurus thrived on what little vegetation had survived and made up a large portion of the global population at the time.

[jurassicjarsandmore]

Fun fact: while I was looking for paint color ideas for this Dimetrodon in a jar, I found out Dimetrodon was not actually a dinosaur. All those children’s books about dinosaurs with pictures of Dimetrodon in them? Lies. Dinosaur toy play sets with Dimetrodon figurines? LIES. However, I’ve decided to ignore that fact because he’s my favorite. Suck it, evolution.

[carnivalcarriondiscarded]

im sorry im rewatching Dominion and its so fucking funny. they really brought dimetrodon & lystrosaurus' Permian Asses into it

[starfieldhouses]

A scene picturing the extinction that happened at the end of the Permian.

Zoom in on the details on the Deviantart page for this one! https://www.deviantart.com/starfieldhouses/art/Extinction-887301499

[smorgasvoid]

Taxa Revisited (Chortis: Territory of Magic) (2 of 2)

Taxa listed:

Ab - The River sheep (Epicanthosaurus ovis) is a species of herbivorous hydroherperian synapsid specialized to eat algae and water plants. They are largely aquatic, only going on land to bask (they are viviparous).

Element: Water

Timid animals, they flee upon sensing predators, such as sharks, odontocetes, and large dyptosaurs.

Bb - The Muotopara (Stenellasaura caerulea) is a well-known species of marine dyptosaur found in the warm parts of Chortis's oceans. It feeds exclusively on fish, squids, and belemnites. Despite all appearances, dyptosaurs are more closely related to sauropods and saurian wyverns than they are to the extinct ichthyosaurs. This technically makes them true dinosaurs.

Element: Water

Cb - The ruby seadragon (Ferventidon rubrocetus) is a mid-sized sea dragon species endemic to the northern coasts of East Soso. It feeds on small fish and crustaceans. Despite its diet, it is highly aggressive, particularly during mating season and its bite has been known to cause severe burns and wounds. When angered, its red-coloration becomes vibrant.

Element: Dragon/Fire

Db - The sea camel (Hydrocamelix gigas), despite its name, is actually a species of toothless marine palaeanodont, making it related to pangolins. Unlike its terrestrial predecessors, it is a herbivore and one of three selenanodontian species on Chortis.

They are largely placid, only using their weight to fend against predators that will eat their young. Adults do not have predators.

Element: Earth

Eb - Domplerichthys hadeli, the giant critterfish, is a large species of mola-like pleuronectiform native to warm waters. Despite being slow, it is not defenseless as it is actually highly poisonous due to its diet of man-o-war-like siphonophores.

Element: Water/Poison

Fb- The northern sea panther (Thalassotigris umbra) might resemble a seal at first, but it is actually a species of feliform related to mongooses. Despite the name, it feeds on small vertebrates, only occasionally eating carrion and sick animals. Social and cooperative animals, they are seen huddled together in order to survive the Amaic cold.

Element: Ice

Gb- The lotus puella or rhubarb puella (Lotodraco virgo) is a species of puma-sized omnivorous frog wyvern native to the deltas and rivers of East Gurujan. It will eat almost anything using its long tongue though it prefers to eat crustaceans, lotuses and smaller amphibians. Puella eggs can stay dormant in dry earth for an unusually long amount of time, hatching when the conditions become suitable. The eggs are protected by an antibiotic gel that is unsuitable for bacterial and fungal growth. A 999 year old egg was successfully hatched long ago by villagers. The adult organisms can live for at least 60-150 years, a lot shorter and more reasonable than the egg itself.

Element: Plant/Light/Water

Oh yeah, and the tadpoles (which are herbivores)

[sleepysaurus4]

My tribute to the first amniote - ancestor of all vertebrates able to reproduce on land. This small, superficially lizard-like creature used to dart around steamy carboniferous forests. It was small but it marked a huge milestone in evolution, being the first vertebrate to lay hard-shelled eggs, leading to all the synapsids, reptiles and parareptiles. If this single mutation had not occurred exactly then and there, or if too many of those animals got eaten by giant bugs and amphibians, leading to their extinction, the most iconic and significant part of land animals would not exist today. Pay respect to our great ancestor :D

[ognimdo2002]

Tropical Diploterro (Pseudosauropodus tropicalis) – Regal Grass Mover

“ A shaggy, grass holding queen. ”

– Rebecca Crane

Tropical Diploterro (Pseudosauropodus tropicalis) is the fictional species of cynodont introduced in Historya Davvun and Worldcraft series.

What is this grass?

The female used the grass and algae known as Diploterro's Hair Grass (Capillogramenus pseudosaurpodus), used as microhabitat for bugs and other critters on her back. The male one doesn't have, probably be ugliest.

Physiology

This synapsid resembles a sauropod, except for their feet and teeth, as a result of convergent evolution. The female one is microecology. The Tropical Diploterro has chestnut-colored skin with peach belly and limb pads, grayish nails on elephantine legs, a longer neck and tail, a low row of edges near the eyes, and ears set near the jaw. The male lacks the plant on its back; only females do.

Abilities

Diploterro had a super weight, and the limbs could cause stun, confusion, and stampede; even using their mouths caused bleeding, and the tail served as a tail. The Tropical Diploterro spits algae or plants with saliva, causing leafblight.

These fur-like structures are algae and grasses that absorbs photosynthesis, which are home to grasshoppers, moths, dragonflies, butterflies, silverfish, and springtails. The plant is called Diploterro's Hair Grass due to its relationship with algae and animals, which is involved in symbolism. This grass was considered harvestable by us, and it regrows after being harvested in just 8 days.

Behavior

The Diploterro is believed to be a land-based animal that lived in herds, similar to unrelated sauropods. Due to their extreme predisposition for violent aggression, diplodoterros will readily attack people and other carnivores.

Distribution and Habitat

The male one lived in plains, swamps, savannas, and others, and the female one was only in forests but migrated to another biome for mating.

Reference

[rudi10001]

FreddyFan95's Parasynapsid made accurate || Magnusaurus

Early depictions of this animal show it as a more spinosaur-like animal; however, a recent study makes Magnusaurus look unlike the sailed fish eaters. Belonging to a strange group of Parasynapsida. But it is still up for debate on whether or not they're true synapsids or just a case of convergent evolution. But the recent description of the Pilosatheriid Parasynapsid Nyembambarhychus in 2023 showed that the group could be stem-Synapsids.

[pixel-cherry-pie]

Hi! I’m back from this weird hiatus and I wanted to thank again all the nice comments and advices! Some of them I read after redesigning the dragon (thanks @synapsid-taxonomy and @doodlepede) and to which I promise that I’ll do another update since this is a personal exercise and I want this to be a continuos work in project.

I hope you guys enjoy this new design and especially thanks to @toot-bender and @bobthedragon2 I defined a more compact body shape (and I tried to give him a more built neck) and more wing membrane, and a more proper tail rudder. I went for a digitigrade look for the aesthetic, but I’ll definitely try also a plantigrade version! I added ears thanks to @thesumlax ‘s advices, but I was told that I should lower them, and honestly looking at actual synapsid skulls I think I’ll definitely too. Added some colours for communication display on the wings and got inspired by butterflies to be fair.

Hope that you can tell from the drawing that the eggshell is soft, so the “milk” from the mom is very similar to platypus milk (keeping the eggs hydrated and feed the babes).

The second pic is a dragon more evolved for gliding (took inspo from the majestic Quetzacoatl). I think that he’d be a pain in the ass of fantasy farmers, finding herds and gliding over them to steal a woolly rhino baby or two. (the new marine dragon version is still under construction!)

[vickysaurus]

Others came to land well before them, in the Devonian. They would’ve been creatures like Tiktaalik and Ichtyostega, with legs that were still a lot more clearly fins.

(Not neccesarily the clearest picture to show this, but they did have Ichtyostega in Paris too!)

Eryops is a relative of modern amphibians, while our own ancestors at this point were already fully land-based animals. They would’ve been early synapsids (sometimes called pelycosaurs) like Dimetrodon.

By the late Carboniferous and early Permian, our ancestors had already split with the reptile-line and they had a few mammal-like characteristics. But none of the big obvious ones like fur and bearing live young and lactation and standing up straight on their legs. So the ones who are on their way to paying taxes would look a lot like reptiles at this point.

Eryops, an amphibian from the Carboniferous and Permian.

[theantarwitch]

Non human Ancestors

I was just thinking... often I see a lot about ancestor work (something that I don’t actually do for reasons lol) which is mostly aimed to human ancestors, our beloved past generations that we never were able to know; but I was taking a shower and it occurred to me: What about our ancestors that are so back in time that are not even human? They existed, right?

Specially having in mind that humans (“modern” humans) are actually so new in the big scheme of the evolution line. As someone said, from Jesus (Year 0) to now, to around 30 years between generations, there are around 56 mothers long (some put up to 80 or 100 mothers). Which is an actually ridiculously small fragment of time. Don’t get me wrong, is a lot of time to us, but the earth is quite oldy. Also, interesting fact: 1 generation ago you have 2 parents, 2 generations ago you have 4 grandparents… 56 generations ago you have 16,000,000,000,000,000 ancestors! So each time you do ancestor work, you have a little army up there lol.

Back to what matters. There were humans before the year 0. There was a moment when they were not even humans, but their evolved blood still flows on out veins, their evolutionary bias still affects us. We find calmness on the shower because we once were living on the water. Our strong emotional based reactions come from the times where our rational thinking wasn’t a thing. The appendix is considered a small leftover from one of our plant-eating ancestors. The coccyx is all that remains of our ancestral tails. Humans pay extra attention to the red color because was a sign of a ripe fruit (and blood). Hiccups might be attributed to an ancient amphibian ancestor. That we and other mammals have 5 fingers is rooted to a dang fish! Our fear of dark, the way we unconsciously analyze others, how we manage to unconsciously pick the “best partner”, the virus and bacteria that live in our bodies in a symbiotic way, and so on. Almost all what we are now, mentally, emotionally and physically, is a result of millions of years of evolution, of species that don’t look like us. An almost endless line of lucky and well adapted creatures, in a web of evolution, trial and error, until now. So why only focus on our modern human ancestors? One of you ancient grandmothers was a “fish”, she did her part and she know things that we have no idea, so why don’t ask them for aid?  

From the Homo Sapiens (Us, in the last 500.000 years) with their extreme mental developed brains, their, inventive, problem solving, creativity, to the Homo Erectus being the first to cook food (controlled fire), to make handaxes, to hunt and gather in coordinated groups, in caring for injured or sick group members, to walk fully straight as us; to the Australopithecus, and back to our unknown Hominini “Missing Link”.

From the Purgatorius, the progenitor of primates, to the Pelycosaur, the one from which Sauropsids (the ancestors of reptiles of all sorts) and of Synapsids (that's mammals AND their ancestors) split off from.

From the Hylonomus, the first reptile, to the Tiktaalik, the first fish in venture to leave the ocean and walk in the earth, to the Agnatha, the first fish.

To the Urmetazoan, the hypothetical last common ancestor of all animals.

3.7 billion years old of ancestors. I think is poetic to think about it. The spirit of some Homo Erectus getting happy when you lit a candle, the Tiktaalik’s spirit noticing how you are in ease when you take a long shower, a fluffy Synapsids’s energy remembering their old times when you sleep comfy on your bed, an anxious Purgatorius’s spirit who see you eat your veggies just like they did… So many unknown ancestors, from the most primitive form of life, seeing their evolutionary mark on you.  

I don’t know, maybe is time to drop a snack in their name, who knows which knowledge they can bring us back, from their experiences in a time where life wasn’t easy, from a time where the earth wasn’t even remotely similar to our earth now. We are almost aliens to them, but we carry them, deep inside our DNA. Who knows in which funky animalistic way they can aid us? Is worthy to think about it, at least for a while. They deserve the recognition too…

[a-dinosaur-a-day]

I promise I'm not trying to gaslight you, but I do have a question on the whole "Birds are Reptiles" matter. I am not trying to say it's wrong, it's just something that genuinely confuses me on the matter. So, birds evolved from dinosaurs/reptiles, so they are dinosaurs/reptiles. But mammals also evolved from reptiles, reptiles evolved from amphibians and amphibians evolved from fish. Wouldn't that make every vertebrate a fish?

A) Mammals didn't evolve from reptiles! They evolved from other Synapsids, which is a completely separate group

B) we don't actually know if we evolved from "amphibians" ie the same group that all living amphibians are in. it's possible tetrapods - the group that includes living reptiles, amphibians, and mammals - had two divergences, with one line leading to amniotes (reptiles + mammals) and the other leading to living amphibians. Remember, all living things have undergone equivalent amounts of evolution over time. living amphibians are very uniquely adapted animals, and we do not know that the earliest tetrapods shared those adaptations. C) yeah, every vertebrate is a fish. or we get rid of the word fish. I vote for option a. there are a lot of things in our anatomies (read Your Inner Fish by Neil Shubin) that are just, because we're fish.