#sussex lawsuit

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

<His barrister pointed that the prince did not believe he was automatically entitled to the same protection he had when he was a senior royal. Harry is merely challenging the way Ravec took the decision.>

🤣🤣🤣 Man, please, you were even more privileged than QE’s children (I am talking about QE because this deal was made while she was still a monarch). Ravec and Met Police has told him zillion of times that he was given such security based on risks and because he isn’t a senior/working royal anymore.

He wants to believe that he didn’t obtained what he wanted because QE’s former private secretary acted for revenge and didn’t follow the process fairly. But the RF even helped him, QE apparently wrote to met police or don’t remember to who, that he was at risk and needed more protection, all the involved came with the conclusion that he isn’t at risk as the RF or he believed.

Honestly I can’t believe how much money the taxpayers have waste in this, there is NO CASE. For every single thing H accuses RAVEC or Met or his family, they all come with a fair rebuttal as to why he isn’t given what he wants (and the best example is his uncle Andrew and his daughters)

Man, I'd love to see the notes Harry wrote his lawyer after she said that because Harry's "but the process!" defense is fooling absolutely nobody.

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

Especially since this was a woman who supported him; she specifically disrupted the court to shout “I support you, Prince Harry!” It’d be a more believable security threat if she was against Harry, because that’s the premise of his argument to RAVEC; that his life is in danger because people and the press hate him. Not because they like him.

Archived Link

https://l.smartnews.com/p-kbM81Xa/QRcz2W

Tell me this is a set-up without telling me this is a set-up.

Prince Harry using tactics like this to try and prove his case, ridiculous.

[celticcrossanon]

Celta, I sent you Neil Sean's latest video on Archie & Lilibet. I talked to a British friend of mine. The surrogate is the baby's birth parent. In order to get the child the parents have to to legally adopt the child, but the certificate is not changed. That's how many adopted children find their real parents. If Archie was born in the UK to a surrogate and the Home Office lawsuit requests Archie's original birth certificate, then we'll see if he was born to a surrogate as that can't be changed.

Hi TeaWithBooks,

That is very good information to have. Thank you for sending this ask and clarifying the situation. :)

Edit: Further to this, here is my theory on what happened:

The surrogate was booked into the hospital under the name of 'The Duchess of Sussex'. She entered the hospital and gave birth under that name. There fore, the hospital records will show 'The Duchess of Sussex' as giving birth in their facility.

A few days/weeks later, Harry and Meghan faked Meghan giving birth by sitting at home and sending out press statements.

The birth certificate had to be altered to read 'The Duchess of Sussex' as otherwise their scam would be revealed . Neither of the two are good with details so this was a change to the original certificate, which actually listed Meghan's names.

So a Duchess of Sussex gave birth and is on the birth certificate as Archie's mother. This will agree with the hospital records. Whether that Duchess of Sussex is Meghan or another person is the important question (most people will assume that it is, but it is a title and not a name, and so not a unique identifier).

Article on alteration to birth certificate (sorry for the picture of Meghan and Harry in the link for the article).

[royaltyspeaking]

Mistreatment of their staff by Harry and Meghan, especially Meghan has been mentioned by multiple news outlets. The Times, Hollywood Reporter and now Vanity Fair, these are not tabloids but credible news outlets. I don't understand how one can completely dismiss these claims. You know two things can be true at once, that the media is unfair towards Harry & Meghan and its also possible that Harry and Meghan are not good bosses.

Credible news outlets also reported that Charles sent Harry to rehab when he was caught smoking weed, and we all know that turned out to be a flat out lie, fed to the press to make Charles look good.

These news outlets are just regurgitating the same old talking points from anonymous sources with ever changing details. First, it was Meghan sent 5am emails. Then it was, okay, she sent 5am emails, but she did specify that she happened to wake up early, and she didn't need a response until later. Then it was she screamed at staff...now it's okay she didn't actually scream. In fact, she spoke in a totally normal tone. But she was direct, so it felt like being yelled at.

Meanwhile, there have been plenty of current and former staff who have gone on the record stating what great bosses the Sussex's are. Until some of these sources calling them awful to work with are willing to put their names out there, I take what they say with a grain of salt. Don't forget that the royal reporters are known for using other RRs as their "sources close to the Royal Family" when reporting on some garbage they heard through the grapevine. Then, those stories are picked up by other news outlets and incessantly reported on until they are eventually accepted at the truth. It's also a known fact that tabloids have offered people thousands of dollars to make up lies about the Sussexs. So, pardon me for being hesitant to believe these stories with dodgy reporting.

One last thing, these negative stories always ramp up when Harry's lawsuits against publishers are going to court. I don't know how you can look at the timing of all this and not think that the smearing is an intimidation tactic.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

New info re: 2023 NYC paparazzi "car chase"...an email that I just received from NYPD indicates that PH felt "intentionally misled" and "suspicious of a coverup" and contacted CA Governor Gavin Newsom to get help finding the right person in the Manhattan DA's office "or higher ups." Entitled much?! by u/BuildtheHerd

New info re: 2023 NYC paparazzi "car chase"...an email that I just received from NYPD indicates that PH felt "intentionally misled" and "suspicious of a coverup" and contacted CA Governor Gavin Newsom to get help finding the right person in the Manhattan DA's office "or higher ups." Entitled much?! This email is from Sussex's security company & is addressed to Chief John Hart, the NYPD Chief of Intelligence who sent a letter dated Dec 6, 2023 to MET Police, which was included as evidence in Harry's lawsuit for tax-payer funded security. Note the mention of RASP in first bullet point (Royalty and Specialist Protection branch of the MET Police). post link: https://ift.tt/ViuOBz6 author: BuildtheHerd submitted: December 11, 2024 at 09:37PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

Ok, so it seems that they’re a government organization. In that case, then they should be publishing, or announcing, their findings in some form.

[feministsforkatemiddleton]

Meghan's jam smearing

Two people names in Blake Lively's lawsuit are sisters Melissa and Sara Nathan.

Melissa Nathan founded The Agency Group, the PR firm hired by Justin Baldoni for "crisis PR."

Sara Nathan is the Editor at Large for the New York Post. She also wrote the Page Six item in March (leaked by the Sussexes, 99.9% likely) that Meghan would never have a photoshop fail the way Kate did.

Regardless of how much Sussex-approved PR played into the Kate saga, they had a hand, and they benefitted from it (or attempted to). Never once did they condemn the misogyny Catherine was facing. And, for Harry, he said nothing while some of the most vile lies and smears against his brother were being thrown around for fun.

Later in March, Meghan "launched" American Riveria Orchard. Never mind whether products will ever come out--Netflix greenlighted her cooking show based around. Which, again, was a harebrained attempt to gain attention and one-up her SIL who was undergoing cancer treatment.

[royal-confessions]

“On the 22nd of January 2025 HRH Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex finally achieved his goal of proving that certain sections of the press are more than liars, they are law breakers, like he said he would in his autobiography Spare. Congratulations your royal highness. Much respect.” - Submitted by Anonymous

“Prince Harry got Rupert Murdoch to admit he's a criminal who employs criminals and for this he will always be my Good King Harry.” - Submitted by Anonymous

“Harry walked away from this lawsuit with a full admission of unlawful behavior by Murdoch's media empire, an apology to himself and his mother and "substantial damages": I'd expect nothing less from Rachel Zane's husband. The bonus I will add is the fact that he doesn't have to travel to Sunken Island on February to testify so it's all about Canada baby!” - Submitted by Anonymous

“Murdoch has settled thousands of cases throughout the years to avoid being found guilty and has always managed to avoid admitting any wrongdoing. Prince Harry and Lord Watson are the first to get him to admit his reporters are guilty of engaging in criminal practices. This is why this settlement is so much different from all the others (including the Prince William one which btw we only know about because of Harry revealing its existence in "Spare"), this is why it's so much more significant.” - Submitted by Anonymous

“It's so heartwarming how Prince Harry made NGN include an apology for the criminal intrusion in Princess Diana's life: he truly is her heir. God bless him.” - Submitted by Anonymous

“I got so much respect for the Sussexes because it is so much easier to do what the firm royals are doing. How easy is it to appease and buy the press and get all the fawning propaganda coverage all the time... It's much harder to say "hey I don't think that's ethical" and drag the press to court resulting in years of vendetta journalism, smear campaigns and even incitement of violence against you. It takes a strong person and marriage to take on billion dollars media empires without backing down” - Submitted by Anonymous

“Tbh it is beyond me how anyone could believe a word about Harry and Meghan coming from the media that they're currently in litigation with. There's a clear as day conflict of interest that makes those reports at best biased and at worst could be considered intimidation/vendetta journalism.” - Submitted by Anonymous

“It's so admirable how hard Prince Harry continues to fight to get justice for his mother by exposing the corrupt parts of the media that killed her. For him to get the first-ever admission of intrusion using law-breaking means into Princess Diana's life by the Murdoch media empire almost three decades after her death is so important and it vindicates his mother who was often called paranoid by the Firm + its supporters for believing that she was being tracked, listened to and spied on in general” - Submitted by Anonymous

“HRH The Duke of Sussex and Lord Watson vs NGN is the UK version of Dominion vs Fox News.” - Submitted by Anonymous

“Prince Harry fought so hard for justice that he got the tabloid industry to issue a public apology to his mother Princess Diana 28 years after they caused her death. I couldn't respect this man more. Son goals.” - Submitted by Anonymous

[feminegra]

Harry Achieves Justice as NGN Admits Guilt and Apologizes for Intrusions on Princess Diana

Prince Harry has achieved a significant victory in his legal battle against News Group Newspapers (NGN), publishers of The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World. The Duke of Sussex settled his lawsuit shortly before the trial began, securing a public apology and substantial damages for unlawful information-gathering. Background of the Lawsuit Prince Harry and Lord Tom Watson, former Deputy…

[brf-rumortrackinganon]

Why do you think she picked the same day as Harry's court date for her new podcast to drop? Surely the court date was set first. Surely she wouldn't want competition for headlines because his first appearance since the Sentebale mess will definitely take precedence over her. Will he not show up at court and protect his precious wife's new venture? Or is this another example of the conscious business uncoupling and they're now in competition to see who will get the most coverage?

Honestly, I feel like it was a coincidence that the podcast is dropping the same day as the trial. If you look at her track record, she always times these kinds of projects/initiatives/PR campaigns to overlap with big BRF events so I think she was aiming for Charles and Camilla’s anniversary (it’s their 20th), which also happens to coincide with their trip.

I’d say she’s intentionally avoiding anything having to do with Kate after the intense backlash she got last year from rolling out the dog biscuits via Nacho (so intense that she actually semi-publicly apologized for it by saying she didn’t know Kate would be at Trooping, even though it had been announced earlier, and she didn’t intend to take the attention away from her) BUT her podcast episodes drop on Tuesdays and April 29th is a Tuesday this year so…

Also the other thing too about Meghan’s track record is she likes to do publicity stunts while Harry is away. I wouldn’t be surprised if part of the decision to time the release with his travel is to be able to papwalk or do a similar PR stunt without having to bother with his opinion.

Yes, I’m aware how tinhatty all this is.

[sassyfrassboss]

“these two are deluding themselves that the past four years never happened.” Or maybe they just have really good weed?

I’m just surprised they admitted it took a year to build that website. It does nothing and offers nothing other than their bios. That should not have taken so long. I’d love to know what the web designer has to say about working with them.

Not gonna lie, Sussex Royal was pretty legit. I mean is was sleek and detailed.

This new website is just an addition to their Archewell site.

They ran out of money so this was the best they can produce.

Also it took them a year to roll out because the coronation hadn’t happened yet. Plus, I bet the creators refused to launch without payment.

Guess Harry’s lawsuit check cleared,

[the-empress-7]

What will the Sussexes do then?

They'll whine to their staff.

Honestly I feel this is their last hurrah (*) - irrelevance awaits. The race card has expired, the Diana narrative is fading, the Royal sheen is off, the lawsuits are almost done... and everyone here has either more serious concerns or better escapism options.

Empress, I love this witty community, we're having a ball not-even-hate-watching - but once we're finished mocking Mrs Sussex, what then?

I low key hope Catherine brings back the culottes, just to give us a new focus 😉

(*) yeah, ok, I guess there's still the divorce, maybe

Haha remember when invoking culottes would make @anonymoushouseplantfan appear? Now those were some times.

[trexalicious]

Prince Harry's US visa drugs lawsuit is set for first court hearing since Donald Trump's inauguration - after US president said he 'wouldn't protect' duke on his return to the White House...

[saintmeghanmarkle]

And right on schedule let the blame game begin: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had their Netflix polo show taken 'out of their control' by bosses insider claims - as couple face withering reviews and even pro-Sussex magazine admits the Duchess's projects 'keep flopping' - Daily Mail by u/wenfot

And right on schedule, let the blame game begin: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had their Netflix polo show taken 'out of their control' by bosses, insider claims - as couple face withering reviews and even pro-Sussex magazine admits the Duchess's projects 'keep flopping' - Daily Mail Okay, we know that the Mail is trying to play both sides here to get Harry to settle his lawsuit against them, as well as get clicks. But I have no doubt who the "source" was. (We also saw the rumblings of this last week, so it's no shocker.Rotten Tomatoes: 22% (still can't post a review). IMDb: holding steady at 2.6 Archive: https://ift.tt/Rn5hYPX post link: https://ift.tt/tN3sJWx author: wenfot submitted: December 15, 2024 at 07:01PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[anonymoushouseplantfan]

"It’s just weird how obsessed they are with their own victimhood" It's textbook narcissism. It's how a narcissist manipulates others into siding with them. It elevates M&H and makes the paps and the tabloids the bad guys, which supports the standard Sussex narrative and talking points. It allies them with Diana, and like Diana, they were "cast out" of the BRF -- even though H&M left on their own accord + Diana forced TQ's hand -- which makes the BRF the bad guys. Pure black + white, good + bad.

True, but still. Their documentary, which blamed the UK tabloids and paps for everything and claimed they now had a peaceful idyllic life in the pap-free US, aired less than six months ago. They still have lawsuits in the UK where they blame the specific tabloid culture there.

It's a sudden swerve (to use a driving analogy). Too sudden.

And Americans are going to lash back, as Mayor Adams and the NYPD demonstrated. It's one thing to blame foreigners. It's different when you're blaming Americans.

[royal-confessions]

“no matter which ‘side’ you’re on, you have to admit that both the Wales and sussexes have TERRIBLE PR. Like the waleses disappearing for a literal month, that carribean photo op disaster, and the over hyped awareness campaign without tangible results. And then the sussexes books and Meghan’s ‘one child is a hobby’ comment and their multiple lawsuits like WHO IS ADVISING THESE PEOPLE.” - Submitted by Anonymous