Tumgik
#supersede
ellen-shame · 6 months
Note
i need to know moreeee about your abo breeding verse. how does it work logistically after sid has the baby — who raises the kid and how do they balance custody if geno is still in the khl 🥹
Hiii anon thank you so much for asking!!!
Okay so Sid is contractually obliged to have two pups but he is not obliged to raise them or be a parent to them in any way except biological. This is the league's investment and they are willing to sort out nannies/adoptive parents, whatever. Most omegas in the programme choose to be hands on parents to some extent because, y'know, it's hard to completely hand your offspring over to someone else even if you were pressured into having those offspring in the first place. (A significant number of omegas quit hockey entirely after having pups because rehab is too hard/they decided they preferred being stay at home parents/they only tried to get into the breeding programme in the first place because it seemed like a good way to make a lot of money by having pups which was what they wanted to do anyway.)
So, onto Sid: he had initially thought he'd hand over the pup to a foster family asap and go back to hockey hockey hockey. He wouldn't completely cut ties with the pup, because he knew his parents would want to meet their grandpup, but he definitely wasn't going to be a hands on parent.
However, once he's pregnant he's obviously not allowed to play, and he has a lot of time to sit around missing that mysterious tall Russian and then feeling odd about how much he misses someone he barely knows. (Worth remembering at this point that Sid and Geno can't say more than two words to each other!) He decides his carrier leave project is going to be learning Russian! Who can say why! He also makes the big decision that he's going to try and have his obligatory second pup asap, so he only has to rehab once, and he can do it while he's younger. This means he's going to be out of competitive hockey for at least three years, which takes him up to 25.
Ok I have to go into work now but more later, anon! I promise!
12 notes · View notes
so-true-overdue · 3 months
Text
Ah yes, human-caused climate change—the grand hoax that thousands of scientists worldwide decided to spend their careers fabricating. Because who wouldn’t want to spend years studying, just to create a fictional crisis?
Here’s the simple, unvarnished truth: our planet is getting warmer. And guess what? We’re the culprits. Burning fossil fuels releases carbon dioxide. More CO2 means more heat trapped in our atmosphere. It’s basic science, not rocket science.
Sure, the climate has changed before. Dinosaurs didn’t drive SUVs, right? But those changes happened over millions of years. We’re speeding things up like a toddler on a sugar rush.
Ice caps? Melting. Sea levels? Rising. Weather patterns? Going haywire. And all of this impacts ecosystems, agriculture, and human lives. Yet, some still argue. They point to snowstorms as proof that global warming isn’t real. It’s like pointing to an iceberg and saying the Titanic is unsinkable.
The fact is, denying climate change is as logical as denying gravity. It doesn’t matter if you “believe” in it or not. The effects are real. The science is clear. We need to act, not because it’s trendy, but because it’s necessary for our survival.
So, the next time someone tells you climate change is a myth, just remember: facts don’t care about feelings. And the fact is, we’ve got a planet to save.
2 notes · View notes
weird-things-to-think · 3 months
Text
Substituir algo avec quelque chose de nuevo in locum prioris.
0 notes
Text
Violence is foolish.
It masquerades as strength but reveals only weakness. Those who resort to violence expose a failure of intellect and a corruption of soul. They betray an inability to resolve conflicts through dialogue, understanding, and empathy. In the end, violence is a coward’s answer to the complex challenges of human interaction.
Violence is the hallmark of corruption. When leaders turn to brutality, they demonstrate a moral bankruptcy that poisons society. They seek to maintain power through fear rather than trust. Such leaders corrupt the very foundations of justice and undermine the principles of fairness and respect. Violence becomes their tool to suppress dissent, silence truth, and enforce obedience.
The relationship between violence and the desire to supersede is clear. Those who crave domination believe violence is a shortcut to control. They ignore the profound truth that true power lies not in force, but in the ability to inspire, lead, and unite. They fail to see that violence only begets more violence, creating a cycle of pain and suffering.
In a world where violence reigns, corruption thrives. It erodes the fabric of society, leaving scars that last generations. The true strength of a society is measured by its ability to resolve differences peacefully, to uplift the oppressed, and to foster an environment where every individual can thrive without fear.
Violence is the refuge of the weak and the corrupted. It is the antithesis of progress and the enemy of peace. We must reject it unequivocally, striving instead for a world where compassion, understanding, and justice prevail.
0 notes
decoding-narcissism · 3 months
Text
Narcissists and the Art of Superseding
Narcissists always want to be on top. They use "supersede" to control and manipulate. They want to replace others and their ideas. This is their power play.
Imagine this: you share a new idea at work. The narcissist dismisses it. They present a similar idea as their own. They want the spotlight. Your contribution is overshadowed. They have superseded you.
In relationships, this behavior is toxic. A narcissist will replace your opinions and feelings. They will say, "You are wrong; this is the right way." They make you doubt yourself. They aim to be the ultimate authority. You start to question your reality. This is gaslighting.
Spotting a narcissist involves watching for these behaviors:
They often interrupt or talk over others.
They always need to be right.
They dismiss others' feelings and opinions.
They twist facts to suit their narrative.
Gaslighting is a key tool. It makes you question your sanity. They will deny things they said or did. They will blame you for their mistakes. Over time, you feel confused and powerless.
Protect yourself by setting boundaries. Keep a record of interactions. Trust your instincts. Recognize when someone is trying to supersede you. Their goal is to control, but you can take back your power. Stay vigilant and assert your value.
0 notes
churchofnix · 3 months
Text
The candle of knowledge flickers, ever bright. In this dance of light and shadow, we find the spirit of progress.
Supersede. To replace, to advance, to evolve. The scientific method is our guide. Through it, we move from the known to the unknown. We question, we test, we learn.
Old truths fall away. New truths emerge. We embrace change, not with fear, but with hope. For in each discovery, we see a step forward. A step closer to understanding the cosmos.
We honor the past, but we do not cling to it. In the realm of science, to supersede is to grow. To grow is to seek truth. And in seeking truth, we find our place in the vastness of the universe.
So let us celebrate the journey. The method that lights our way. For in every hypothesis, in every experiment, in every conclusion, we see the power of the human mind. We see the promise of a better tomorrow.
0 notes
Power moves in subtle ways.
Supersede—a word that means to take the place of someone or something. This powerful tool can shape decisions, steer opinions, and change lives. It’s not just about replacing; it’s about controlling the narrative.
Imagine this: a new product comes out. It’s advertised as the latest, the best. It supersedes the old. People rush to buy, leaving the previous version behind, forgotten. This isn’t by chance. It’s a calculated move.
When one idea supersedes another, it doesn’t just replace it. It redefines what’s important. It changes what we value. The old becomes obsolete, the new becomes necessary.
Supersede can guide thoughts and behaviors. It’s subtle but powerful. It’s the art of making the old seem unworthy, while the new shines bright. It’s not just about change. It’s about control.
Beware of what supersedes in your life. Notice how it shapes your choices. Stay aware. Stay in control.
0 notes
faith-in-democracy · 3 months
Text
Supersede: A Path to Civility and Democracy
Democracy thrives on respect.
In today's world, debates often turn into shouting matches. We see people talking past each other, not listening. It's time to bring back a sense of civility. The key is to let better ideas supersede worse ones.
When we argue, it's easy to dig in our heels. We want to win. But democracy isn't about winning. It's about finding the best path forward together. This means being open to change, to letting the best ideas rise to the top.
Supersede isn't just a word. It's a practice. It means recognizing when an idea is better, even if it's not ours. It means valuing truth over ego. When we let good ideas replace bad ones, we all win.
Imagine a world where we listen first. Where we seek to understand, not just respond. Where we value truth and wisdom. This is a world where democracy flourishes. It's a world where everyone feels heard and respected.
Civility and democracy go hand in hand. When we let the best ideas supersede, we build a stronger, more respectful society. We show faith in each other and in our democratic process.
Let's make the choice to listen. To respect. To let the best ideas win. Our democracy depends on it.
0 notes
Text
The Psychopathy of Capitalism: The Drive to Supersede
In the relentless pursuit of economic supremacy, capitalism reveals a psychopathic core that systematically devalues human life and ethical considerations.
Abstract
This paper examines the psychopathy of capitalism through the lens of its inherent drive to supersede. By analyzing the mechanisms and motivations underpinning capitalist structures, we argue that capitalism's insatiable desire to dominate fosters a sociopathic disregard for individual welfare, social equity, and environmental sustainability. The discussion highlights the systemic nature of this phenomenon, rooted in the fundamental principles of capitalist competition and profit maximization.
Introduction
Capitalism, as the dominant economic system, thrives on competition and the perpetual quest for growth. This incessant drive to surpass competitors and achieve ever-higher levels of profit is often lauded as the engine of innovation and progress. However, this paper posits that such a drive, when left unchecked, mirrors the traits of psychopathy—marked by a lack of empathy, an inclination towards manipulation, and a relentless pursuit of self-interest.
The Mechanisms of Supersession
Central to capitalism's psychopathic tendencies is the concept of supersession, wherein entities continuously strive to outdo each other. This phenomenon is observed in various forms: technological innovation, market expansion, and aggressive mergers and acquisitions. The drive to supersede compels corporations to prioritize profit over ethical considerations, leading to practices that harm workers, consumers, and the environment.
Technological Innovation and Human Cost
While technological advancements can enhance productivity and quality of life, the capitalist imperative to innovate often disregards the human cost. Automation and artificial intelligence, for instance, are celebrated for their efficiency gains but frequently result in significant job displacement and economic inequality. The individuals and communities affected by these changes are seldom factored into corporate decision-making processes, highlighting a profound empathy deficit characteristic of psychopathic behavior.
Market Expansion and Environmental Degradation
Capitalism's drive to supersede is also evident in its pursuit of market expansion. Corporations seek to penetrate new markets and maximize consumption, often at the expense of environmental sustainability. The relentless exploitation of natural resources and the prioritization of short-term profits over long-term ecological health exemplify a sociopathic disregard for the planet's future.
Mergers, Acquisitions, and the Erosion of Competition
The pursuit of supremacy through mergers and acquisitions further illustrates capitalism's psychopathic tendencies. By consolidating power and reducing competition, corporations can dominate markets and dictate terms to suppliers, workers, and consumers. This concentration of economic power undermines democratic principles and exacerbates social inequalities, reflecting a manipulative and exploitative disposition.
Conclusion
Capitalism's psychopathy, as demonstrated by its drive to supersede, poses significant ethical and social challenges. The systemic devaluation of human life, social equity, and environmental sustainability underscores the need for a critical reassessment of capitalist principles. To mitigate the detrimental effects of this economic system, there must be a concerted effort to infuse ethical considerations into corporate governance and policy-making. By recognizing and addressing the psychopathic traits inherent in capitalism, society can strive towards a more humane and equitable economic order.
1 note · View note
extremely-moderate · 3 months
Text
Good-faith political compromise isn't just necessary; it's the lifeblood of democracy. In a world where division seems to grow daily, finding common ground can be a beacon of hope. When leaders work together, real progress happens. This isn’t about abandoning principles; it’s about forging a path that benefits everyone.
Take healthcare reform, for example. When both sides came together, millions gained access to care. It wasn’t perfect, but it was a step forward. This compromise saved lives and showed what’s possible when we unite.
Climate action, too, benefits from bipartisan efforts. Policies that blend innovation and regulation are key. These solutions protect our planet and boost our economy. They show that collaboration creates a stronger, greener future.
Education reform thrives on compromise. Investing in schools and teachers, while embracing new methods, helps our children succeed. This is how we prepare future generations to tackle tomorrow’s challenges.
Good-faith compromise doesn’t mean surrendering ideals. It means listening, understanding, and working towards a common goal. It means recognizing that progress, however incremental, is better than stagnation. Our nation’s greatest achievements have often come from such cooperation.
In these polarized times, embracing good-faith political compromise is more important than ever. It’s the way forward, ensuring that we don’t just survive but thrive together. Let’s champion collaboration and create a future we can all be proud of.
0 notes
Text
Trust in Society Starts with Accountability
Accountability is the bedrock of a functioning society. When we hold each other accountable, we maintain the integrity of our relationships and the trustworthiness of our professions. It's not just about pointing out mistakes; it's about ensuring everyone meets their responsibilities.
In families, accountability starts at home. Parents teach children to own their actions, fostering a sense of responsibility. When a family member fails to contribute to household chores, addressing it directly and respectfully reinforces the importance of shared duties. This practice nurtures a culture of trust and reliability.
Friends, too, must hold each other accountable. If a friend consistently breaks promises, addressing it openly is crucial. It’s not about confrontation; it’s about valuing the relationship enough to ensure honesty and commitment.
In the workplace, accountability is paramount. Professions like healthcare, law enforcement, and engineering rely heavily on the trustworthiness of their members. For instance, in healthcare, a nurse must report any negligence they witness to maintain patient safety. If coworkers fail to follow protocols, addressing these issues head-on prevents harm and maintains the profession's integrity.
Law enforcement officers are entrusted with upholding the law. If one officer witnesses another engaging in unethical behavior, it is their duty to report it. This accountability prevents corruption and ensures the public's trust.
In engineering, adherence to safety standards is critical. If an engineer overlooks a crucial safety measure, their colleagues must address it immediately. This vigilance protects lives and upholds the profession's reputation.
Holding people accountable isn't about being punitive; it's about ensuring reliability and trust. By doing so, we create environments where everyone feels safe, respected, and committed to upholding shared values. This is how we maintain the trustworthiness of our professions and the fabric of society.
1 note · View note
ellen-shame · 6 months
Note
Different anon but still asking about the breeding prgrm, is there some kind of combine for omegas? How do they even get selected in the first place? Are they drafted separately, (nicknamed the baby draft a la the baby bar exam perhaps?) Are there scouts who are good at picking out dynamics before people present?
Omg I love getting these questions so much <3333
First of all, in my 'verse people present around the middle of puberty, usually at 12 or 13, so by the time the combine rolls around everyone knows their dynamics.
OKAY SO the omegas go to the same combine as the alphas and betas; however, the three groups are treated very differently.
The betas basically experience the IRL combine.
The omegas have to go through a LOT of additional tests to assess their breeding potential, given that their fertility is widely considered the most valuable thing they can offer to the league, since omegas are generally taken much less seriously as athletes. Usually they're drafted pretty low - it's rare for an omega to be drafted in the top twenty. Most omegas play in the omega league; the very good ones make it to the AHL; and the extraordinarily, freak-of-nature-level good ones make it to the NHL. (Omega league teams are attached to NHL teams like AHL ones are. Normally omegas will be bred with players from the NHL team they're attached to, because then the team doesn't have to pay stud fees. Teams only pay stud fees if they think it's really going to be worth it to import another team's player's genetics.) So as well as assessing the omega players' competition record and overall fitness at the combine, they also have blood tests to assess their fertility hormones and very unpleasant physical exams to check everything seems to be normal and healthy down there. This is what Sid remembers and was so traumatised by. So if an omega is a good-but-not-great player, BUT they come from a large, healthy family and has, let's say, a sire who was also a competitive athlete, they might be considered a better prospect than an omega with a better personal record on the ice but without that lineage. Sid was considered remarkable because his competition stats were so good that teams almost didn't care about his fertility stats. Almost.
Alphas too have to go through very invasive fertility testing; sperm count, knot duration, etc. However, this is generally considered less important for them, and if a very promising alpha player has poor fertility stats, it's not really a mark against them, because of course alphas are there to compete whereas omegas are there to breed.
3 notes · View notes
weird-things-to-think · 3 months
Text
Ok, so "syoopersed" means like when one thingy takes over another thingy. It's like if u has a frend and then u get a new frend and the new frend is more fun, the new frend "sooperseds" the old frend. Or if u hav an old shooe but then u get new shooes and the new shooes is better, the new shooes "sooperseds" the old shooes. So ya, "soopersed" is wen one thingy is better and takes the place of anuther thingy.
1 note · View note
krazieka2 · 2 months
Text
Tumblr media
Here's a big old Fire Emblem Search & Find I did for the FE3H Masquerade Zine! Find the Golden Deer, but see if you can't find the rest of the students as well! For the ultimate challenge, see if you can't name every character! (Disclaimer two characters are NPCs with no names)
#double bonus can you identify the 2 or 3 fe3h characters that AREN'T in the scene?#i say 2 or 3 but i probably forgot more :( im using you people to check my work#fe3h#carrying over my posts from twitter choo chooooo#fireemblem#im not going to tag everyone but you're welcome too! good luck!!#instead let me tell you about the mini narratives i came up with while drawing this#soren is waiting for Ike to get back with food#seteth just noticed flayn dancing WITH A BOY from afar#rhea was supposed to sing but got superseded (she's okay with it actually)#monica and ferdinand are trying to start a dance off with edelgard and hubert (its not working)#Ashe stepped on Annette's toes and is freaking out. Lorenz is trying to give pointers but it's only sort of helping#balthus absolutely stole some of the betting pool money. i think i forgot to ink the coins falling out of his hands! dang#metody and shahid are going to become great friends and have a wirlwind romance before one betrays the other in a cutthroat fashion#Lysithea left a single cake slice on the table and Miklan is just happy to have gotten his before she showed up#ike and leopold had a flex off#Gilbert is stuck between young lovers this isn't a narrative i just think it's funny#oh and of course Sylvain managing to piss off Sera Charlotte and Maribelle while Felix ignored him and Ingrid looks on#that's supposed to be roy not eliwood btw i forgot to color his headband so it's basically eliwood#that's all i can think of rn but if you played#thank you!!! i hope you had fun#this was SO much fun to make thank you to the mods for facilitating me#haha this post has been up for 20 minutes and people are already pointing out so many characters I forgot. ur keeping me humble
610 notes · View notes
revvethasmythh · 5 months
Text
On the topic of FCG potentially being reincarnated--it makes sense as an option the party might organically consider attempting, but, as we saw with Laudna's death (and even Percy's way back when), input from the player is a really operative aspect of whether a character will be resurrected. Marisha clearly did not want to let Laudna go, so they pursued a long road to bring her back. Alternatively, Taliesin was totally willing to let Percy go if he thought the ritual offerings wouldn't be enough (shoutout to Vex's nat 20 persuasion check for this one).
And Sam? Well, Sam, as a player, loves to fail. Because failing is interesting, usually far more interesting than succeeding. We're talking about a guy who openly derides luck points and fervently refused to use the halfling luck feature except in the ONE instance where succeeding the roll would have had a worse outcome than failing. Regardless of how I or anyone else feels about losing FCG and/or wanting them back, Sam does not strike me as the kind of player who would want to bring FCG back after going out like this, available reincarnation or not. I would both suspect and anticipate that this will be FCG's final showing, just based on what I know of Sam as a player
748 notes · View notes
xiaq · 9 days
Text
I think I've reached a point where I'm going to actively start avoiding some family members. I put up with them for the last decade because "they're family," but between the racism, homophobia, and transphobia (not to mention the batshit MAGA conspiracy theories) I think I'm just...done.
I was talking to my partner about whether or not we would attend the annual thanksgiving dinner they host since we'll be in town and we had to stop talking about it because my anxiety skyrocketed. I don't want to subject my partner to dealing with individuals who are proudly racist against people of his race, nor do I want to have to try and play nice with individuals who, by their own admittance, would rather I didn't exist. Then again, I'm not sure they know I'm queer. Which, I think, would be the only reason I'd like to see them in person again. So I could inform them face-to-face and see if it made them even a little less hateful.
It's just. So terrible. To look at people you used to have fond feelings for in your childhood and now only feel embarrassment and sadness.
179 notes · View notes