#stoptherot

[llewelynpritch]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT-iRPAx7lOfhz6AJqETz071Y2m0Zv4epAVwqEoMRbUkc1g82YfmhYu8_X3IcugFbyIIvdT5eP4uVuY/pub What’s the plan for Upgrade Democracy? 30 August - 1 September 2024 XR 6 August 2024

Windsor is located on south bank of River Thames, Eton and Windsor Castle nearby. Only 24.8 miles west of Central London Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead, Berkshire, England, Great Britain, UK.

[redsaxguy]

Office malfeasance

Malfunctioning autocrats

Bureaucrats failing

Maladminsters

Our trust betrayed so beastly

Bread and circuses

Babylon falling

Mene tekel upharsin

Overthrown kingdoms

🥳🫂💅🎻💸🔥🙈🙉🥖🎪🤹‍♂️🎡⏳⌛🧐🫵⚖️⚔️

[fairfieldroofing]

Act Now to Prevent Roof Rot - Expert Fairfield Roofing Services Available!

Is your roof showing signs of wear and tear? Don't wait for a small problem to become a big one! At Fairfield Roofing, we specialize in giving your roof the care it needs to stand strong against the elements.

🛠️ Whether it's leaks, missing shingles, or general wear, our team of experienced professionals is equipped to tackle any roofing challenge. Don't let roof rot set in - a small fix today can save a costly replacement tomorrow.

📅 Schedule your professional roof servicing with us today and ensure your home stays safe and secure.

For more details, contact us at

Phone: 203-505-8931 or visit

Website: fairfieldroofing.com

#RoofRepair #FairfieldRoofing #RoofMaintenance #ProfessionalRoofing #StopTheRot #HomeCare

[karanscottcoaching]

will never forget how utterly betrayed I felt when the penny dropped, and I realised that my in-laws knew of Steve’s manipulative plan to evict us from the family home, for the equity. Whilst I understood and accepted they could not have cared less about me, what about the safety and well-being of the kids?! Did they really not care where the children - aged 5 and 10 at the time - lived, or the quality of life they would now potentially have to endure? I highlight this defining low point, and the end of my relationship with these people, in a couple of chapters of #TooRelieved, but most notably the one entitled Mr & Mrs Scrooge McDuck. This was my affluent sister-in-law and husband, who advised me, during the fraught days I needed to count coppers to pay for food, that I should think about going to a Food Bank. Yes, really. So, my point in telling you this now is… if you’re struggling and people are watching you struggle, they are NOT your people — and you need to amputate the gangrenous lump(s) from your life, else they poison you entirely. Only spend time with those who lift you higher. Too Relieved To Grieve | The Alternative Heartbreak Handbook, out now in paperback and on Kindle: https://amzn.to/2Y4sC0s (link in bio) #scroogemcduck #notfamily #watchingyousuffer #amputatethem #stoptherot #betrayed #betrayal #heartless #skinflints #poverty #risefrompoverty #imadeit #despitethem #toorelievedtogrieve #karanscottauthor #thealternativeheartbreakhandbook #memoir #truestory #reallifeevents #authorsofinstagram #authorlife #writer #writersofinstagram #writer #bookpublicity https://www.instagram.com/p/CdLtXmaoFqE/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[heinzschumi]

#dontbreakabeatingheart By December 2020 vital services will be removed form the Royal Brompton Hospital, some will be gone for good. The Hospital to be sold off piece by piece. Make your voice heard, write to your local MP, local Councillor, to the Hospital itself. #stoptherot #savetheroyalbromptonhospital #theroyalbromptonmatters #saverbh https://www.instagram.com/p/CC_9hxaAqTn/?igshid=qjdnrlflaq0z

[charlesgonzo]

#GonzoLecture #truth #truths #truthart #art #aphorism #sayings #sayit #tellthem #socialise #realise #makethisworldabetterplace #dobetter #bebetter #stoptherot #treatotherswell #behowyouwishtobetreated #haveselfrespect #selfrespect #respect #respectothers #respectyourself #image #selfhelp #bethechange #bethechangeyouwanttosee #shutup

[provisionconstructionltd-blog]

Beautiful day to be giving someones home a fresh new look #replaceyourfascia #stoptherot

[makersontheedge]

You won't see Volksy McVolksface around Makers for a few weeks. He's gone for a revitalising holiday with Jason the welder. #vwvan #vwtype2 #vwtransporter #1976 #welding #repair #stoptherot #makers555 http://bit.ly/2VOB4gG

[stoptherot2015-blog]

France legislates on food waste – Is UK next?

France has brought through a momentous piece of legislation forcing supermarkets to give away unsold food, and banning them from destroying any food products fit for consumption.

French local councilor Arash Derambarsh and endorser of Stop the Rot campaign said this is ‘a historic victory’ and highlighted that ‘it is extremely rare for a law to be passed so quickly and with unanimous support’. Derambarsh’s ‘Manifeste contre le gaspillage’ has been pushing the issue of food waste in the French Assembly, and Arash himself speaks from his own personal experience of going hungry while a student living off £280 a month.

This campaign has only been running since December 2014, but Arash’s tireless efforts to integrate social action, public mood and political will have made it incredibly swift and effective. This law will include education programmes for schools and businesses and feed into France’s plan to reduce food waste by 50% by 2025.

Originally introduced as an amendment into the law for ‘Energy Transition’ in April 2015, the food waste element was then dropped in August due to late submission . The resubmission has now been given the green light with unanimous support across political divides. Now Arash has set his sights on an EU level regulation on food waste in supermarkets.

But, how did they get here and what about us in the UK?

The UK is seen by many in Europe to be a leader on food waste policies; this is more a reflection of the weakness of regulation in Europe than of a strong-arm UK. Our national voluntary commitment, the Courtauld Commitment is seen by industry actors to be an international example, but this leaves a lot of space for wriggle-room on food waste obscuring targets behind broader packaging targets and pushing responsibility on to consumers and producers wherever possible.

France has experienced a shift in recent years as public mood has shifted around regulation and restrictions on ugly fruit and veg, which was emphasized by the Intermarche campaign les fruite et legumes moches combining healthy eating campaigns with irregular shaped fruit and veg.

As we start to question the perfection of fruit and vegetables in the UK too, we need powerful campaigns like this to capture public mood. Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall’s War on Waste campaign is highlighting the inaction of UK supermarkets on this issue.

What is most compelling about this French regulation is the unanimous cross-party support. Here in the UK we are seeing a similar reaction in government, food waste is an issue of resource efficiency and business as much as it is one of justice and welfare, and this is bringing all sides of the political divide together. Much of the power in the UK movement on food waste resides in action against poverty and food bank redistribution, just yesterday the latest Feeding Britain report detailed the extent of this issue across the nation. It is naturally common sense to see this excessive waste at supermarket level and connect it with an urgent need with a growing number of UK citizens in poverty.

In France the Manifeste contre le gaspillage is only dealing with the food wasted at the point of sale, something very tangible for the public, but as our campaign highlights; retailer in-store food waste is very low in the mix of wastes through the supply chain (BRC suggest 1.3%). The important thing is to note the responsibility for causing the waste, something that the Big 4 UK supermarkets have an enormous power over.

The protestation of supermarket representatives in France reminds us of the responses of UK supermarkets who tussle to avoid any form of government and public involvement in their affairs. Supermarkets operate largely outside of regulatory mechanisms in the UK, and we can see from a 78% reduction in plastic bag use inside 2 months, regulation works. The power of this move in France demonstrates a first step on the long road to reigning in the corporate excesses of our big food businesses.

Currently, Kerry McCarthy MPs ‘Food Waste (Reduction) Bill’ is moving through parliament with supporters on all sides of the political spectrum seeing sense on firm action on food waste. This bill goes for a Second Reading in Parliament on the 29th January, you can ask your MP to support the motion and start a shift towards what France have achieved this week.

[llewelynpritch]

UPDATES FROM UNIST'OT'EN

‘What’s been happening at the Healing Centre?

The Unist’ot’en Clan and the employees and volunteers at the Healing Centre had six successful land-based healing programs over the winter and spring, welcoming Wet’suwet’en people in need of treatment and healing from substance use and the trauma of colonization. The Healing Centre, with its remote location, offers a unique healing environment, allowing participants to enjoy the outdoors, go hiking or snowshoeing, take part in the sacred waters of the Wedzin Kwah, and otherwise be free to exist in a way that is impossible and unsafe in an urban rehabilitation clinic. At Unist’ot’en, participants are also able to engage in programming with their spouses and families, where as in other rehab spaces, participants are separated from their families and forced to heal alone.

The FNHA held a weeklong program at the Centre in June, with participants taking part in a Psychological First Aid Training and sharing powerful traditional knowledge from across nations. We hope to have them back and are grateful for their support of our work and space! What a pleasure to have you with us.

The annual Summer Work Party in June focused on Fire Prevention and Safety, with participants coming from all over Turtle Island and beyond, including New York, Washington, Montreal, and Germany. We cleaned up dry brush from all across the grounds, planted an herb and vegetable garden, and created connections and lasting friendships with both new and returning supporters.

Want to be a part of our Healing Revolution?

Come to our August Work Party!

We would love to have you join us in August. Come for as little as a week, or come early and stay late! We welcome visitors year round, but Work Party is the only time new supporters can come for less than two weeks.

But will I be helpful?

Yes, you will be! All skillsets are needed, but especially: Chainsaw operators, construction tradespeople, cooks, cleaners and organizers, gardeners, medics, fire fighters, drone operators, and people who love to get their hands dirty with hard work. Drivers are also needed, so if you have a reliable vehicle but only a few days to spare or are unable to stay at camp for long, please consider becoming a driver to get much needed supplies and people from Vancouver to Houston, BC.

What happens at Work Party?

We have structured days with three excellent meals and free time each evening for card games, hiking, and swimming in the clean river, just downstream from where we get our excellent drinking water. There is a set schedule for a morning meeting where we decide on our projects for the day and check in with each other about our capacities, then there are set times for meals, with projects happening between them. There are medics on site, snacks and drinks provided all day, tenting under the stars, hot showers a couple of times a week, laundry available once every ten days, and plenty of opportunity to get to know your fellow volunteers, the land, and the Unist’ot’en clan.

What’s happening with the Pipeline? Will I get arrested?

There is no active blockade on Unist’ot’en territory, and unfortunately the pipeline is still forcing its way through despite our clear and obvious lack of consent. Traffic from the construction still drives past our Healing Centre and disrupts our peace, but the chance of being arrested at camp is essentially the same as that of being in the city. By participating in helping to keep the Healing Centre operational, you are helping to preserve what few considerations are being taken by the province and industry. As long as the Healing Centre is in place, the river will be protected and her people will be able to continue to access desperately needed programming.

Okay, I want to come! What next?

Before applying to come to camp, please read the preparing for your visit page on our website and pay particular attention to the consent guidelines and guidelines for behaviour. Behaviour going against our guidelines will not be tolerated.

After reading the above page, we welcome you to register here! Please tell your friends and share with your community. The river needs you!’

LINK

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vRvpF6BY6nkPDfCo9A8S3wkhcCnWsGwE4HZREKouZnS-7GgmcwY5clJ39yLNtQTepEfRrzOb1L7elhg/pub Unist'ot'en Updates and Work Party Details @UnistotenCamp ‘The Unist'ot'en Camp exists to uphold the clan's decision to prevent all pipelines from entering their unceded lands. Wet'suwet'en unistoten.camp’ ('Help Stop The Rot International UK CA' Llewelyn Pritchard 1 August 2024) 

'STOP THE ROT' LINKS 2024

2. https://lnkd.in/eKN2hQmR https://lnkd.in/eXdX799r STOP THE ROT INTERNATIONAL FREE RESOURCES UPDATED #FreeResources #International #StopTheRot #FossilFuelDisasters #CivilResistance #ClimateGenocide #ActNow #TellTheTruth #BeTheChange #RightsOfNature #ClimateJustice #HumanRights #GlobalCitizens #UpgradeDemocracy #Information #XRHumanitysEmergencyServicesSocialClimateJusticeLocal 22 July 2024

3. https://lnkd.in/eKN2hQmR https://lnkd.in/eXdX799r STOP THE ROT INTERNATIONAL FREE RESOURCES UPDATED #FreeResources #International #StopTheRot #FossilFuelDisasters #CivilResistance #ClimateGenocide #ActNow #TellTheTruth #BeTheChange #RightsOfNature #ClimateJustice #HumanRights #GlobalCitizens #UpgradeDemocracy #Information #XRHumanitysEmergencyServicesSocialClimateJusticeLocal 22 July 2024

4. https://pampalmater.com/ ‘Educate. Empower. Transform. Follow me on a powerful journey of education, empowerment, and transformation and be part of a growing community that is committed to meaningful reconciliation with Indigenous peoples and social justice for all!’ Dr. Pam Palmater Clearing the lands has always been at the heart of Canada's Indian Policy [blog] Originally published in Globe & Mail 27.2.20 Facebook YouTube Chair in Indigenous Governance @Pam_ X Twitter Instagram Publications Resources Blog Contact Shop #TransformationalPowerOfEducation #ClimateJustice #HumanRightsAreRightsOfNature  22 July 2024

Indigenous Truth Before Reconciliation

5. Russell Diabo Truth Before Reconciliation 'Defend the land, the environment and our people. Justin Trudeau's "Framework" legislation on "Rights Recognition" is a direct threat to Indigenous Peoples Right of Self-Determination. It needs to be stopped and be restarted with the People from the ground up.' X Twitter Instagram Facebook LinkedIn Threads YouTube https://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/201/300/first_nations_strategic_bulletin/2021/FNSB_Jan_July21.pdf First Nations Strategic Bulletin Index https://mediacoop.ca/author/russ-diabo

6. https://youtu.be/9omxCI1lEMA RUSS DIABO TRUTH TELLER FIRST NATIONS TURTLE ISLAND #Landback #SelfDetermination #Justice #ClimateJustice #RightsOfNatureAreHumanRights #DefendTheDefenders

7. VERY HIGHLY RECOMMENDED https://youtu.be/9omxCI1lEMA Q & A's About Recognition & Implementation of Indigenous Rights Framework Legislation Russ Diabo 22 July 2024

[llewelynpritch]

JOHNSON DELAY ON RUSSIA DOSSIER HELPS PUTIN, SAYS LITVINENKO WIDOW wife of poisoned ex-spy warns of risks in suppressing report on UK interference. Luke Harding and Dan Sabbagh 5 Nov 2019 2024-10-05 10.29.11

During his tenure as the UK's Foreign Secretary from 13 July 2016 to 9 July 2018, Boris Johnson faced significant criticism for his handling of several key responsibilities. Here are some reliable and valid examples of his failures:

National Security and Intelligence

- Johnson was accused of failing to organise his own department effectively, particularly in the context of Brexit preparations. This included sending out mixed messages about the role of the Foreign Office and failing to prepare the department adequately for the implications of Brexit [7].

Protection of UK Citizens

- One notable incident involved Boris Johnson wrongly claiming that Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a British citizen imprisoned in Iran, had been training journalists in the country. This statement was seen as exacerbating her situation and was widely criticised [1].

- There were also concerns about the Foreign Office's handling of risk assessments for citizens abroad. For instance, a whistleblower case highlighted that the Foreign Office had failed to adjust risk assessments for the whistleblower's family, indicating potential lapses in protecting UK citizens[8].

International Relations

- Johnson's tenure was marked by several diplomatic gaffes that strained international relations. For example, he described Africa as "that … (colonial) … country" and suggested that Libya had a bright future if it simply "cleared the dead bodies away," which were seen as insensitive and undiplomatic [1].

- His lack of a "conventional diplomatic manner" led to significant consequences, with one foreign minister jokingly referring to Sir Alan Duncan, the Europe minister, as Johnson's "pooper scooper" due to the frequent need to clean up after Johnson's mistakes [1].

- Johnson failed to persuade other countries to agree on key issues. For instance, he was unable to secure consensus from other countries on certain matters, as highlighted by Italian Foreign Minister Angelino Alfano's statement that there was no consensus on Johnson's proposals [6].

General Diplomatic Incompetence

- Johnson's appointment as Foreign Secretary was seen as a sign of the Foreign Office's diminished influence within the British government. He was the least experienced British politician to hold the office since at least 1945, having never been a government minister or headed a government department before [2].

- His staff became frustrated with his inconsistency and failure to grasp detail, which further undermined the effectiveness of the Foreign Office during his tenure [3].

These examples illustrate the various ways in which Boris Johnson's performance as Foreign Secretary was criticised for failing to execute key responsibilities related to national security, intelligence, protection of UK citizens, and international relations.’

Notes 

i)  ‘While Perplexity AI strives to provide accurate and reliable information, it is essential for users to critically evaluate the information obtained and verify it through additional sources when necessary.’ ‘It is always advisable to independently verify and cross-reference the information obtained from any AI system’ 

ii)  ‘Dawn Sturgess died on 8 July 2018, after being poisoned by Novichok, a highly toxic nerve agent, on 30 June 2018. She had used a discarded perfume bottle containing the nerve agent, which she found in a charity bin in Amesbury, England 2 3 6.

The inquiry into her death is investigating the circumstances and the responsibility for the attack, including the issue of Russian state involvement, with suggestions that the operation may have been sanctioned by Russian President Vladimir Putin 6.’ #AI #Perplexity 14 October 2024

iii) https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/oct/14/salisbury-novichok-poisonings-inquiry-sergei-skripal-vladmir-putin  ‘UK believes Putin personally authorised Salisbury novichok attack, inquiry told. Dawn Sturgess inquiry hears from Foreign Office and from Sergei Skripal, who said Russia thought he was still working for the west. 

The UK government believes that the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, authorised the Salisbury novichok poisonings, which could have killed thousands of people, an inquiry has been told.

A senior Foreign Office (FCDO) official has given a statement to the inquiry spelling out that the British government has concluded the nerve agent attack was so sensitive that Putin himself must have given it the go-ahead.

The inquiry also heard that the former Russian spy Sergei Skripal, who was the target of the attack, blamed Putin. In a new statement provided to the inquiry, he said: “I believe Putin makes all important decisions himself. I therefore think he must have at least given permission for the attack.”

Source: Steven Morris 14 October 2024 

Citations:

[1] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-foreign-secretary-next-conservatives-leader-foreign-office-minister-a8939396.html 

[2] https://www.politico.eu/article/turf-war-behind-boris-johnsons-shock-new-job-foreign-secretary-theresa-may-cabinet/ 

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/jul/18/what-diplomats-really-think-about-boris-johnson 

[4] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47854338 

[5] https://www.timesofisrael.com/in-shakeup-uks-johnson-demotes-foreign-secretary-after-afghanistan-fiasco 

[6] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39580761 

[7] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jan/30/boris-johnson-accused-of-failing-to-organise-his-own-office-for-brexit [8] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/investigation-foreign-office-especially-when-boris-johnson-britton-bp6ke

Links

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQL6B3qOkq3OvmWsNnJhNjGGSnPccuc8IyFH1QoHgZ_LW6uG7n23_XwlNpIIvk-GA_6WW96bu2E8Mc0/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-uks-foreign-secretary.html Johnson’s ‘Cover-Up’ UK's Foreign Secretary 13 July 2016 - 9 July 2018: significantly criticised for handling several key responsibilities of National Security and Intelligence, Protection of UK Citizens, International Relations and General Diplomatic Incompetence. #AI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 15 October 2024

[llewelynpritch]

Boris Johnson cannot be trusted: ‘There were disagreements between Boris Johnson and Baroness Hallett on the terms of reference for the UK COVID-19 Inquiry. The disagreements primarily revolved around the breadth of the subject matter or material sought by Baroness Hallett, particularly the unredacted WhatsApp messages and diaries of Boris Johnson, who was the Prime Minister during the pandemic 3 6.’#AI #Perplexity #OpenSource Llewelyn Pritchard 7 December 2023

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vQdD5Jr3AQYA66XnOeNgpM-c8HVUgrgyTtiq4qKPTj_dBzbOIxrAyr4UeT1NOXKuKAsCl1GVxFwmhkc/pub

https://lnkd.in/eb3tjwwE

[llewelynpritch]

JOHNSON DELAY ON RUSSIA DOSSIER HELPS PUTIN, SAYS LITVINENKO WIDOW wife of poisoned ex-spy warns of risks in suppressing report on UK interference. Luke Harding and Dan Sabbagh 5 Nov 2019 2024-10-05 10.29.11

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTxRUMTEIE3I_njNCTiO7nHuF2LBv3nD6u2y30AL_OScONaPyAupQj7TveJu87MQdUJltZqQkgJLUcP/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html Johnson's ‘Cover-Up': Given Labour's mandate for change and the serious nature of the unethical behaviour, crime and treason allegations against Boris Johnson, investigating these issues is not just politically expedient but essential for the integrity of the UK's democratic institutions and national security. #AI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 7 October 2024

[llewelynpritch]

Charlie Rowley found the nerve agent in a perfume bottle in a charity shop bin. Photo Sam Frost Support The Guardian https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yXFGLRVD1pJN3hWySGJ3C8oFmkELlvYPVWx7YLSPV3g/pub https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html https://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html https://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/09/will-dawn-sturgess-public-inquiry-terms.html Will the Dawn Sturgess Public Inquiry Terms of Reference allow its Report intentionally omitting civil and criminal liability to be ‘spun’ into the Johnson Cover-up Story? Consisting, at the very least of ‘Tory Sleaze’ unethical behaviour in office; ignoring his own agencies’ intelligence advice; breaching National Security in secretive meeting(s) with Alexander Lebedev, Perugia, Italy; media complicity for his own ends with Evgeny Lebedev; Russian Interference EU Referendum 2016; accepting Russian oligarch Conservative Party donations; ‘constitutional corrosion’ epitomised by ‘LondonGrad Laundromat’; enabling Putin’s Brexit by his failed leadership; interfering in an early, possible Russian-Ukraine peace deal; purportedly supporting the welfare of Ukraine whilst more concerned about ‘saving his own skin’; his Crony COVID Contracts and missing five COBRA meetings whilst otherwise distracted - becoming yet another example of unethical behaviour in the UK Government’s way of working? #AI #Perplexity #MoveOnNothingToSeeHere Llewelyn Pritchard 6 October 2024

[llewelynpritch]

'Boris Johnson Eton Fools Gaming The System PartyBoy Rules' Political Satire #DeepAIGenerated Llewelyn Pritchard 11 January 2024

Johnson's 'Cover-Up': 'Given Labour's mandate for change and the serious nature of the unethical behaviour, crime and treason allegations against Boris Johnson, investigating these issues is not just politically expedient but essential for the integrity of the UK's democratic institutions and national security.' #AI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 7 October 2024

'Boris Johnson Eton Fools Gaming The System PartyBoy Rules' Political Satire #FishyRishyArtworks #DeepAIGenerated Llewelyn Pritchard 7 October 2024

‘... it's clear that Boris Johnson's tenure as Prime Minister was marked by numerous controversies and allegations of unethical behaviour. However, it's important to note that the determination of whether these actions constitute criminal activity or fraud would require a formal legal investigation and ruling. 

That said, some of the behaviours described could potentially be considered unethical or in violation of governmental norms and regulations:

1. Ignoring intelligence advice and breaching national security: If proven, this could potentially violate official secrets laws or protocols for handling sensitive information.

2. Secretive meetings with Alexander Lebedev: Depending on the nature and content of these meetings, this could raise questions about conflicts of interest or improper influence.

3. Russian interference in the EU Referendum: If Johnson was aware of and failed to act on evidence of foreign interference, this could be seen as a dereliction of duty.

4. Accepting donations from Russian oligarchs: This could potentially violate campaign finance laws or regulations on foreign political contributions.

5. Crony COVID contracts: If contracts were awarded improperly or without due process, this could potentially be seen as misuse of public funds or corruption.

6. Missing COBRA meetings: While not necessarily criminal, this could be seen as a failure to fulfil the duties of the office.

7. Interfering in a potential Russia-Ukraine peace deal: This would depend on the nature of the interference and whether it violated any international agreements or protocols.

The term "constitutional corrosion" suggests a gradual undermining of democratic norms and institutions, which, while not necessarily criminal, could be seen as damaging to the integrity of the government.

It's important to note that the use of terms like "fraud" or "criminal activity" in relation to these allegations would require substantial evidence and legal proceedings. Without a formal investigation and ruling by the appropriate authorities, these remain allegations of unethical behaviour rather than proven criminal acts.

The search results indicate that there have been calls for investigations into various aspects of Johnson's conduct, including by former ethics advisers and opposition parties. However, as of the date of the search results, no formal criminal charges had been brought against Johnson related to these allegations.’

Citations:

[1] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/corruption-claims-roiling-uk-government-put-johnson-under-pressure 

[2] https://www.libdems.org.uk/news/adlib-articles/the-a-z-of-tory-sleaze-scandal 

[3] https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-pm-rishi-sunak-cant-leave-the-stench-of-tory-sleaze-behind-nadhim-zahawi-boris-johnson/ 

[4] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/18/the-guardian-view-on-tory-decline-splits-sleaze-and-a-rush-for-the-exit 

[5] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/jul/01/scandal-timeline-tory-sleaze-boris-johnson 

[6] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/23/world/europe/britain-lobbying-laws-johnson-sleaze.html 

[7] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-sleaze-partygate-evans-b1990647.html 

Source of Query: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/johnson-s-cover-up-in-what-sor-.zqcoMT8ThmWH84yR9rxrQ#0 Johnson's ‘Cover-Up': In what sort of possible circumstances may at the very least his ‘Tory Sleaze’ unethical behaviour in office; ignoring his own agencies’ intelligence advice; breaching National Security in secretive meeting(s) with Alexander Lebedev, Perugia, Italy; media complicity for his own ends with Evgeny Lebedev; Russian Interference EU Referendum 2016; accepting Russian oligarch Conservative Party donations; ‘constitutional corrosion’ epitomised by ‘LondonGrad Laundromat’; enabling Putin’s Brexit by his failed leadership; interfering in an early, possible Russian-Ukraine peace deal; purportedly supporting the welfare of Ukraine whilst more concerned about ‘saving his own skin’; his Crony COVID Contracts and missing five COBRA meetings whilst otherwise distracted during government be termed 'fraud' 'fraudulent behaviour' or any other potential type of criminal activity? #AI #Perplexity #DeepAI ChatGPT Llewelyn Pritchard 7 October 2024

‘ … ignoring intelligence advice and breaching national security, if proven, could potentially violate official secrets laws or protocols for handling sensitive information. However, whether this amounts to high treason is a complex legal question that depends on the specific circumstances and interpretation of the law. Here's a breakdown of the key points:

1. Criminal activity: 

Yes, these actions could potentially constitute criminal activity, particularly if they involve violating official secrets laws or protocols for handling sensitive information.

2. High treason:

The definition of high treason in the UK is specific and narrow. According to the search results [6], high treason includes:

- Depriving the sovereign of the Crown

- Levying war against the sovereign

- Assisting foreign powers to invade the UK or other countries belonging to the sovereign

3. Severity of the offence:

While ignoring intelligence advice and breaching national security are serious offences, they may not necessarily meet the specific criteria for high treason unless they involve a deliberate attempt to overthrow the government or assist foreign powers in harming the UK.

4. Official Secrets Act:

Violations of the Official Secrets Act, which governs the handling of sensitive information, are serious offences but are typically prosecuted separately from treason.

5. Intent and impact:

For an act to be considered high treason, it typically needs to involve a deliberate attempt to undermine the state or sovereign, often with the intent to cause serious harm or danger to the country.

6. Legal process:

Determining whether an act constitutes high treason would require a formal legal investigation and ruling by the appropriate authorities.

7. Other relevant offences:

The search results [5] mention a new 'failure to prevent fraud' offence, which, while not directly related to treason, indicates that there are various legal mechanisms to address misconduct in handling sensitive information or failing to prevent criminal activities within organisations.

In conclusion, while ignoring intelligence advice and breaching national security could potentially constitute criminal activity and violate official secrets laws, they would not necessarily amount to high treason unless they meet the specific criteria outlined in the law. The determination would depend on the specific circumstances, intent, and impact of the actions, and would require a formal legal investigation and ruling.’

Citations:

[1] https://www.coe.int/en/web/commissioner/-/intelligence-secrecy-must-not-be-used-as-an-excuse-to-ignore-or-cover-up-human-rights-violations 

[2] https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/how-we-work/providing-specialist-capabilities-for-law-enforcement/major-crime-investigative-support 

[3] https://assets.college.police.uk/s3fs-public/2022-03/Menu_of_tactics.pdf 

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traitor 

[5] https://kpmg.com/uk/en/blogs/home/posts/2023/11/what-does-the-forthcoming-failure-to-prevent-fraud-offence-mean-for-your-organisation.html 

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_treason_in_the_United_Kingdom 

[7] https://beta.nationalarchives.gov.uk/explore-the-collection/stories/the-treason-act/ 

[8] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-sleaze-partygate-evans-b1990647.html 

Source of Query: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/johnson-s-cover-up-in-what-sor-.zqcoMT8ThmWH84yR9rxrQ#2 Does 1. ignoring intelligence advice and 2. breaching national security 3. potentially violating official secrets laws or protocols 4. for handling sensitive information if proven, 5. amount to 6. criminal activity and/or 7. high treason?

                 c)‘… the manipulation of mass media preceding a General Election or Brexit Referendum by a Foreign Secretary potentially collaborating with the newspaper owner(s) could potentially constitute criminal activity or even be considered treasonous under certain circumstances. Here's an analysis of how and why:

Misinformation and disinformation:

Deliberately spreading false or misleading information through mass media to influence an election or referendum could be considered a form of electoral fraud or interference. This is especially concerning if done by a high-ranking government official like a Foreign Secretary [1][4].

Collaboration with media owners:

If a Foreign Secretary were to collude with newspaper owners to spread disinformation, this could be seen as an abuse of power and potentially violate laws regarding fair elections and media impartiality [5].

Foreign interference: 

If the collaboration involved foreign entities or served foreign interests, this could potentially be considered a form of treason, especially if it undermined national security or sovereignty [1][2].

Undermining democratic processes:

Manipulating public opinion through false information attacks the integrity of democratic processes like elections and referendums [3][4].

Breach of ministerial code:

Such actions would likely violate the ministerial code, which requires government officials to act with integrity and in the national interest [5].

Potential criminal offences:

Depending on the specific actions taken, this could potentially violate laws related to electoral fraud, misconduct in public office, or even the Official Secrets Act if sensitive information was misused [2][5].

Erosion of trust:

Such actions significantly erode public trust in democratic institutions and the media, which can have long-lasting negative effects on society [1][3][4].

While the term "treason" has a very specific legal definition that may not apply in all cases, actions that deliberately undermine democratic processes and potentially serve foreign interests could be seen as treasonous in spirit, if not in strict legal terms.

It's important to note that proving such allegations would require substantial evidence and likely involve complex legal proceedings. The severity of the offence would depend on the specific actions taken, the intent behind them, and their impact on democratic processes and national security.’

Citations:

[1] https://www.kcl.ac.uk/how-is-fake-news-affecting-the-uk-general-election-and-can-anything-be-done-about-it 

[2] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/about-ofcom/what-we-do/helping-to-dismiss-disinformation-around-the-general-election/ 

[3] https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/articles/zrkpcxs 

[4] https://pressgazette.co.uk/comment-analysis/uk-general-election-misinformation-what-publishers-can-do-about-it/ 

[5] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/corruption-claims-roiling-uk-government-put-johnson-under-pressure 

[6] https://www.libdems.org.uk/news/adlib-articles/the-a-z-of-tory-sleaze-scandal 

[7] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-sleaze-partygate-evans-b1990647.html 

[8] https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-01-13-social-media-manipulation-political-actors-industrial-scale-problem-oxford-report 

Source of Query: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/johnson-s-cover-up-in-what-sor-.zqcoMT8ThmWH84yR9rxrQ#3 Explain how and why mass media manipulation preceding a General Election and Brexit Referendum 2016 by a Foreign Secretary, potentially Prime Minister collaborating with the owner(s) of national newspapers may constitute criminal and/or treasonous activity?

                         d) ‘... it's challenging to definitively state whether a successful legal prosecution could be achieved for criminal activity or treason in the cases you've outlined. However, we can analyse the potential legal implications:

1. Criminal activity:

Some of the actions described could potentially constitute criminal offences, particularly:

- Accepting illegal donations (if proven to be from foreign sources or not properly declared)

- Misuse of public funds (in the case of "crony COVID contracts")

- Misconduct in public office (for various actions that breach the ministerial code)

The burden of proof for criminal cases is "beyond reasonable doubt," which sets a high bar for prosecution.

2. Treason:

The legal definition of treason in the UK is very narrow and specific. Based on the search results, it typically involves actions like:

- Levying war against the sovereign

- Assisting foreign powers to invade the UK

- Attempting to overthrow the government by force

Most of the actions described, while potentially unethical or even criminal, may not meet the specific legal criteria for treason. The burden of proof for treason is also extremely high.

Key challenges for prosecution:

1. Evidence: Gathering concrete evidence of intent and direct involvement in these actions would be crucial and potentially difficult.

2. Political immunity: Some actions taken as Prime Minister may be protected by certain immunities or fall into grey areas of executive discretion.

3. Complexity: The interconnected nature of these allegations and their international dimensions add layers of complexity to any potential prosecution.

4. Public interest: Prosecutors would need to consider whether pursuing such cases is in the public interest, given their potential political ramifications.

While many of these actions have faced public scrutiny and criticism, translating them into successful criminal or treason prosecutions would face significant legal and practical hurdles. It would likely require extensive investigations, clear evidence of intentional wrongdoing, and a strong legal basis for each specific charge.

It's important to note that political accountability and legal accountability are not always the same. Many of these issues might be more likely to face political consequences (such as loss of public trust or electoral defeat) rather than criminal prosecution.’

Citations:

[1] https://goodlawproject.org/revealed-the-tories-are-still-receiving-funds-from-russia-linked-donors/ 

[2] https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-donations-russia-lubov-chernukhin-b2026678.html 

[3] https://bylinetimes.com/2022/03/01/the-conservatives-have-a-long-history-of-taking-money-from-russia/ 

[4] https://www.politico.eu/article/britain-tories-russian-money-oligarch/ 

[5] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/corruption-claims-roiling-uk-government-put-johnson-under-pressure 

[6] https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-pm-rishi-sunak-cant-leave-the-stench-of-tory-sleaze-behind-nadhim-zahawi-boris-johnson/ 

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traitor 

[8] https://www.libdems.org.uk/news/adlib-articles/the-a-z-of-tory-sleaze-scandal 

Source of Query: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/johnson-s-cover-up-in-what-sor-.zqcoMT8ThmWH84yR9rxrQ#4 Is it likely that a successful legal prosecution may be achieved on distinctive  yet related burdens of proof about criminal activity and/or treason by 

1. a Foreign Secretary and Prime MInister (same official) who enabled Russian Interference in the EU Referendum 2016 

2. accepted Russian oligarch Conservative Party donations 

3. practised ‘constitutional corrosion’ epitomised by ‘LondonGrad Laundromat’ 

4. facilitated Putin’s Brexit by his failed leadership 

5. interfered in an early, possible Russian-Ukraine peace deal 

6. purportedly supports the welfare of Ukraine as a cover-up for the part he played in starting Putin’s invasion 

7. his Crony COVID Contracts 

8. missing five COBRA meetings whilst otherwise distracted 

8. lying about his claim that COP26 has limited global warming to 1.5°C? 

                    e) ‘Based on the search results and the specific cases outlined, evaluating the likelihood of a successful legal prosecution for criminal activity and/or treason is complex. Here's an analysis of the potential legal implications:

1. Evidential Stage:

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) must first be satisfied that there is enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction [1]. This requires:

- Sufficient credible evidence for each allegation

- Consideration of the impact of any likely defence

- An assessment that it's more likely than not that a court would convict

For the cases outlined, gathering concrete evidence of intent and direct involvement would be crucial and potentially challenging, especially for allegations involving international relations or covert activities.

2. Public Interest Stage:

If the evidential test is met, prosecutors must then consider if prosecution is in the public interest [1]. Factors include:

- Seriousness of the offence

- Level of culpability of the suspect

- Circumstances and harm caused to the victim

- Impact on the community

- Proportionality of prosecution

Given the high-profile nature of these allegations and their potential impact on national security and democratic processes, the public interest in prosecution could be significant.

3. Burden of Proof:

In criminal cases, the prosecution bears the burden of proof [4][6]. They must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, which is a high standard [6].

4. Specific Offences:

- For allegations of accepting illegal donations or misuse of public funds, there may be clearer legal frameworks and precedents.

- Allegations related to "constitutional corrosion" or "failed leadership" may be more difficult to prosecute as specific criminal offences.

- Treason has a very narrow legal definition and extremely high burden of proof [4].

5. Challenges:

- Political immunity may protect some actions taken as Prime Minister.

- The complex and interconnected nature of the allegations adds layers of difficulty.

- Some actions, while potentially unethical, may not clearly violate specific laws.

6. Abuse of Process:

Courts have the power to stay proceedings to prevent abuse of process, but this is exercised only in exceptional circumstances [5]. Prosecutors should not bring cases where it's highly likely the court will find the defendant cannot have a fair trial.

Conclusion:

While some of the outlined actions could potentially constitute criminal offences, achieving a successful prosecution would face significant hurdles:

1. Meeting the evidential stage for each allegation

2. Proving criminal intent beyond reasonable doubt

3. Overcoming potential political and legal immunities

4. Clearly defining and proving specific criminal offences for some of the more abstract allegations

A successful prosecution for treason seems particularly unlikely given its narrow legal definition and extremely high burden of proof.

The likelihood of successful prosecution would vary significantly between the different allegations, with some (like financial misconduct) potentially being easier to prove than others (like "failed leadership").

Overall, while investigation and scrutiny of these allegations is important for democratic accountability, translating them into successful criminal prosecutions would face substantial legal and practical challenges.’

Citations:

[1] https://www.college.police.uk/app/prosecution-and-case-management/charging-and-case-preparation 

[2] https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/law-action-how-prosecutors-apply-centuries-legislation-contemporary-crime 

[3] https://www.oblaw.co.uk/whats-your-success-rate/ 

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_burden_of_proof 

[5] https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/abuse-process 

[6] https://www.bljsolicitors.co.uk/blog/understanding-the-standard-of-proof-in-criminal-cases/ 

[7] https://hallellis.co.uk/burden-proof-balance-probabilities/ 

[8] https://kpmg.com/uk/en/blogs/home/posts/2023/11/what-does-the-forthcoming-failure-to-prevent-fraud-offence-mean-for-your-organisation.html 

Source of Query: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/johnson-s-cover-up-in-what-sor-.zqcoMT8ThmWH84yR9rxrQ#5 Evaluate the likelihood of achieving a successful legal prosecution for criminal activity and/or treason in the cases outlined on the basis of your analysis of potential legal implications.

                    f) Based on the information provided and the Labour Party's 2024 manifesto focusing on "Change" and mission-driven government, there are several compelling reasons why the new Labour Government would need to investigate the allegations of unethical behaviour, crime, and potential treason:

1. Restoring Trust in Democracy:

Labour's manifesto emphasises "stopping the chaos" and "rebuilding the country". Investigating high-profile allegations against previous governments aligns with this mission by demonstrating a commitment to transparency and accountability. This could help restore public trust in political institutions, which is crucial for a healthy democracy [1][3].

2. National Security Implications:

Some of the allegations, particularly those involving potential Russian interference or breaches of national security protocols, have significant implications for the UK's national security. As the new government, Labour has a responsibility to ensure that any potential threats or vulnerabilities are thoroughly investigated and addressed [3] [8].

3. Upholding Democratic Processes:

Allegations of interference in democratic processes strike at the heart of the UK's democratic system. Investigating these claims is essential to protect the integrity of future democratic exercises and to reassure the public about the fairness of past ones [4].

4. Public Interest:

Given the high-profile nature of these allegations and their potential impact on national security and democratic processes, public interest in thorough investigations and potential prosecutions is likely to be very high. Failing to act could be seen as a dereliction of duty by the new government [5].

5. Breaking from Past Practices:

Labour's promise of "Change" and mission-driven government provides an opportunity to differentiate themselves from previous administrations. Investigating these allegations could demonstrate a clear break from past practices and a commitment to higher ethical standards in government [3][4].

6. Legal and Moral Obligation:

As the new government, Labour has both a legal and moral obligation to investigate serious allegations of misconduct, especially those that could constitute criminal activity or threaten national security [7].

7. International Credibility:

Thoroughly investigating these allegations could help restore the UK's international credibility, particularly in relation to issues like financial transparency and combating foreign interference [8].

8. Strengthening Democratic Safeguards:

Investigations could lead to recommendations for strengthening democratic safeguards and closing loopholes that may have been exploited in the past [5][6].

Not acting on these allegations could indeed be seen as a continuation of unethical political behaviour and could undermine Labour's promise of change and mission-driven governance. It could also erode public trust and potentially leave vulnerabilities in the UK's democratic and security systems unaddressed.

The Labour government's commitment to "mission-driven government" and its focus on long-term national goals provides a framework for addressing these issues systematically [3]. By investigating these allegations, the government can demonstrate its commitment to its missions, particularly those related to economic growth, clean energy, and taking back the streets [1][2].

In conclusion, given Labour's mandate for change and the serious nature of the allegations, investigating these issues is not just politically expedient but essential for the integrity of the UK's democratic institutions and national security.’

Citations:

[1] https://www.dartfordlabour.org.uk/the-labour-governments-missions/ 

[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/our-first-steps-for-change 

[3] https://labour.org.uk/change/mission-driven-government/ 

[4] https://labour.org.uk/change/ 

[5] https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/mission-driven-approach-government 

[6] https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/five-steps-government-missions 

[7] https://kpmg.com/uk/en/blogs/home/posts/2023/11/what-does-the-forthcoming-failure-to-prevent-fraud-offence-mean-for-your-organisation.html 

[8] https://www.politico.eu/article/britain-tories-russian-money-oligarch/ 

NOTE ‘While Perplexity AI strives to provide accurate and reliable information, it is essential for users to critically evaluate the information obtained and verify it through additional sources when necessary.’ ‘It is always advisable to independently verify and cross-reference the information obtained from any AI system’ 

Sources of Query: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/johnson-s-cover-up-in-what-sor-.zqcoMT8ThmWH84yR9rxrQ#6 https://www.perplexity.ai/search/johnson-s-cover-up-in-what-sor-.zqcoMT8ThmWH84yR9rxrQ#7 Based on the information provided and the Labour Party's 2024 manifesto focusing on "Change" and mission-driven government, there are several compelling reasons why the new Labour Government would need to investigate the allegations of unethical behaviour, crime, and potential treason:

Restoring Trust in Democracy: Labour's manifesto emphasises "stopping the chaos" and "rebuilding the country". Investigating high-profile allegations against previous governments aligns with this mission by demonstrating a commitment to transparency and accountability. This could help restore public trust in political institutions, which is crucial for a healthy democracy 1 3.

National Security Implications: Some of the allegations, particularly those involving potential Russian interference or breaches of national security protocols, have significant implications for the UK's national security. As the new government, Labour has a responsibility to ensure that any potential threats or vulnerabilities are thoroughly investigated and addressed 3 8.

Upholding Democratic Processes: Allegations of interference in democratic processes strike at the heart of the UK's democratic system. Investigating these claims is essential to protect the integrity of future democratic exercises and to reassure the public about the fairness of past ones 4.

Public Interest: Given the high-profile nature of these allegations and their potential impact on national security and democratic processes, public interest in thorough investigations and potential prosecutions is likely to be very high. Failing to act could be seen as a dereliction of duty by the new government 5.

Breaking from Past Practices: Labour's promise of "Change" and mission-driven government provides an opportunity to differentiate themselves from previous administrations. Investigating these allegations could demonstrate a clear break from past practices and a commitment to higher ethical standards in government 3 4.

Legal and Moral Obligation: As the new government, Labour has both a legal and moral obligation to investigate serious allegations of misconduct, especially those that could constitute criminal activity or threaten national security 7.

International Credibility: Thoroughly investigating these allegations could help restore the UK's international credibility, particularly in relation to issues like financial transparency and combating foreign interference 8.

Strengthening Democratic Safeguards: Investigations could lead to recommendations for strengthening democratic safeguards and closing loopholes that may have been exploited in the past 5 6.

Not acting on these allegations could indeed be seen as a continuation of unethical political behaviour and could undermine Labour's promise of change and mission-driven governance. It could also erode public trust and potentially leave vulnerabilities in the UK's democratic and security systems unaddressed.

The Labour government's commitment to "mission-driven government" and its focus on long-term national goals provides a framework for addressing these issues systematically 3. By investigating these allegations, the government can demonstrate its commitment to its missions, particularly those related to economic growth, clean energy, and taking back the streets 1 2.

In conclusion, given Labour's mandate for change and the serious nature of the allegations, investigating these issues is not just politically expedient but essential for the integrity of the UK's democratic institutions and national security.

Linkshttps://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vTxRUMTEIE3I_njNCTiO7nHuF2LBv3nD6u2y30AL_OScONaPyAupQj7TveJu87MQdUJltZqQkgJLUcP/pubhttps://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.htmlhttps://landprotectorshumanrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.htmlhttps://muskratfallscivilrightsmovement.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.htmlhttps://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/10/johnsons-cover-up-given-labours-mandate.html Johnson's ‘Cover-Up': Given Labour's mandate for change and the serious nature of the unethical behaviour, crime and treason allegations against Boris Johnson, investigating these issues is not just politically expedient but essential for the integrity of the UK's democratic institutions and national security. #AI #Perplexity Llewelyn Pritchard 7 October 2024

[llewelynpritch]

https://unitedforclimate.blogspot.com/2024/08/stop-rot-international-free-resources.html

https://labradorleadstheworld.blogspot.com/2024/08/stop-rot-international-free-resources.html STOP THE ROT INTERNATIONAL FREE RESOURCES UPDATED Llewelyn Pritchard 4 August 2024