#star rail remains infinitely superior in that regard
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
One day Mihoyo will let Genshin have a woman who's actually morally gray. Perhaps even evil.
#i am taking my L now that arlecchino's stories and lines have leaked#yeah even if i wasn't completely off the mark they're fully pushing the 'she's just acting' characterization#sigh#good for the kids and for people who wanted her to actually care deep down#i'm very worried about dottore now#if the harbinger who had two of her colleagues get lines about how insane she is gets sanitized like that#will he ever see the light of day as playable and without being bleached to an unrecognizable state#he is a guy which might be good for that#genshin just seems allergic to making women any kind of morally gray#star rail remains infinitely superior in that regard#and that's why i have plenty of women on THAT game#genshin#genshin spoilers#ray's records#god i hate it here
17 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
One for All and All for One: The study in complimentary and infinite (wasted) potentials
One for All and All for One: two Quirks whose history we can, in the universe of Boku no Hero Academia, treat almost as the history of society. Their users had left enormous impact on everyone in the series, and through hints we can see their influence stretching long, long back to the first appearance of the Quirks.
Neither Quirk can be considered ānormalā, though: the ability to take away Quirks at whim and an ability to share Quirks with others (which would inevitably leave you Quirkless) are both complete anathemas to the society that by and large is half-in love with the idea of simply having a Quirk (which deserves a whole breakdown in on itself, but thatās not what Iāll be writing about here!). And yet, One For All users are all heroes, and All for One users are all villains as far as we know (written after the release of manga chapter 280).
How is that even possible? With how objectively similar they are, why arenāt they both heroes, or both villains?
Well, before we take a crack at how Horikoshi coded the Hero society that made this happen, letās first take a look at just why Iām so surprised the two Quirks arenāt on the same āsideā. Also, obligatory āspoilers aheadā warning for everyone whoāre anime-only watchers, or havenāt gotten past Meta Liberation Army arc in manga.
Purely from the activation/mechanics point of view, All for One and One for All are warped mirror images of each other. All for One functions on the assumption that a) the user knows the other person has a Quirk and b) the Quirk doesnāt have an inherent clause that disallows itself to be taken by force when it comes to taking it. One for All is the only Quirk so far that has shown the resistance to the b), as it is encoded in the very nature of the āshare-alongā Quirk that forms the true base of One for All that it can only be given away willingly.
Why is this so important? Because All for One doesnāt only take Quirks, itās also capable of releasing them and giving them to others, whether the recipient is willing or unwilling. In this regard, One for All is startlingly identical: it can be forced upon someone else, as long as the DNA is exchanged and the previous user is willing to give it away. This little fact is often overlooked (likely deliberately) by the existing canon in favor of emphasizing the ācannot be taken forcefully awayā which makes sense plot-wise, but not ethics and logic-wise.
But who knows, maybe Horikoshi is holding back on us, and One for All ends up being the ultimate villain of the story.
ā¦ yeah, not likely. But the idea is interesting, isnāt it?
Moving onto the way they interact with their users and other Quirks, One for All and All for One are again very, very different, but with a shared approximate visualization of usage behind it. The closest approximation of how they interact with other Quirks would be, in my opinion, be gravity ā but two very different applications of gravity.
There are two relevant things you need to know about gravity: it is defined by the masses of an object interacting with another object, and every single object in the universe has its own gravity field. (thank you, Physics nationals I went to once, for forcing me to learn more about gravity!)
All for One is more akin to a star within a stable planetary system: it holds planets, satellites and comets (other Quirks) locked in its orbit, but any change can make all those objects lose their orbits and go wander in the deep space. Its hold is strong, but the fact still remains it can be nullified in order to give away Quirks. Itās also stable ā its attraction/hold power doesnāt change with the number of Quirks taken, it simply gives it a bigger array of powers to work with.
One for All on the other hand would be closer to black hole: its gravity is so enormous even light, the fastest object in the universe, cannot escape it, and its mass (and therefore its gravity) grows stronger with every object it swallows. Once it grabs a hold of anything (its userās other Quirk) it merges it with itself and keeps it for forever, with very little chance of it ever surfacing again as individual Quirk (unless your name is Midoriya Izuku). However, it heavily relies on the energy (other Quirks it merges with) to provide power-ups; hence the ridiculous difference between Izukuās and Toshinoriās One for All. (also protagonst shenanigans, but weāre not going that far into metatextuality here ā that needs its own essay)
So, concept-wise, One for All and All for One are again identical in the idea behind it, but drastically different in application ā both still fucking scary, but what can we do here, our main protagonist and antagonist need to have OP armor around themselves.
This leads us to the probably the biggest spoiler Iāll discuss in this essay:
this panel.
In chapter 270 of manga, Shigaraki Tomura is revealed to have been passed All for One, which is a whole mindfuck in on itself that Horikoshi needs to explain stat because Iām going crazy over here with theories (!!!), but moving on. The short and extremely brief summary of what happens afterwards is: Heroes discover where Tomura is while heās still being transferred All for One, they wreck the Nomus and facility, Shigaraki gets partial All for One and his original Quirk Decay goes absolutely nuts again, Izuku runs off to face him, and at one point point, while using Ragdollās Search, Shigakari utters a very strange sentence while seemingly under the influence of All for One (the Quirk):
āYou will be mineā¦ little brother.ā
Moments later, Shigaraki snaps out of it and comments about Sensei (All for One) no longer being his puppeteer, that heās making his own choices and not Senseiās.
Here we get a stunning punch in the plexus about what we already have been hinted at during Izukuās fight with Shinsou Hitoshi, during Kamino Ward and Joint Training Arcs:
One for All and All for One both retain the echoes of their past owners.
Now, here comes a million dollar question: is this something both the baseline āshareā part of One for All and All for One possess (which would further link the two Quirks, and also explain a lot of characterizations in the series so far), or is it an imprint of All for One on āstockpileā part of One for All that āshareā part absorbed and made its own? Both possibilities are extremely intriguing and make any future possibility of unification (which was apparently Senseiās original goal before, judging by that one panel) extremely volatile, and very intriguing if Horikoshi pursues that idea to its end.
Speaking of the man himself, now we arrive at the question that really started the whole essay here: how come it was All for One chosen to be the ultimate evil, and One for All to be ultimate good? As weāve seen so far, both Quirks are startlingly similar; theoretically, could All for One be a āheroicā Quirk and One for One for All āvillainousā?
The answer is yes and no.
Yes, because theoretically, switching the two would still make the story work; itād change the motivations of characters drastically, sure, and turn the story of generations of good trying defeat one evil into one good fending off generations of evil, but itād work ā and no, because thatād fundamentally change the society in which Boku no Hero Academiaās current time frame is, and society is the key underlying factor in this entire story.
Let me explain through the examples of three characters and a faction.
Midoriya Izuku is Quirkless person in a society who is, like I said at the beginning, half-in love with the idea of having Quirks ā the fact that you have them makes you seem useful, someone with potential, no matter how objectively useless some Quirks inevitably can be in certain lines of work. By their standards, heās without potential, and therefore is largely useless out of gate. Had All for One been in public eye and celebrated as Hero, heād be the pinnacle of useful: thereād be no danger of bad reactions to donated Quirks in his DNA, and he, someone who wishes desperately for a Quirk, could easily be given a Quirk of someone who finds their life unbearable due to it.
Bakugou Katsuki, someone with extremely property-damaging Quirk, would constantly be told that if he doesnāt behave himself, heād be sent off to All for One to have his Quirk taken away ā in essence, heād be no one special, just another kid with a Quirk. Since All for One is so visible, itād be all too easy for parents and teachers to threaten their kids into compliance whenever they throw an over-powered tantrum with the removal of a Quirk; itād also be a good deterrent for any Pro Heroes that existed there to not get too comfy with their jobs, because they could easily be taken out of it if they manage to anger All for One enough, which would deter some people from being Pro Heroes.
Shigaraki Tomura (Shimura Tenko), someone whose Quirk came in during an extremely traumatic event and left him so scarred mentally he was never quite the same again, could easily simply give away his Quirk and have something far less volatile and triggering if he wished so, and also have a chance of potentially one day seeing his Quirk in the hands of someone like Izuku or Melissa, who could use it to its full potential without being constantly triggered by it or being re-traumatized again and again by the society who would rail on him for having such a potentially devastating Quirk.
Meta Liberation Army (which is a poorly disguised Brotherhood of Mutants on Genosha in X-men cartoons, letās be realistic ā the whole thing about the superiority of fight-compatible Quirks was not subtle at all) would be a much smaller and a lot less influential group. The publicity of a Quirk being able to take away other Quirks would make the existence of Deika City clones very, very difficult; itād take but one hint, one whisper of a fringe group amassing in remote location that wants to eliminate so-called āuseless Quirksā for All for One to act ā as much of an asshole as he is, he was shown [cite] to like all kinds of Quirks, despite only keeping the ones he felt were the most useful to him.
OK, but what about them being on the same side? You might ask yourself. If theyāre so similar, why not make them both on the same side?
One, drama is always more delicious if there are high personal stakes involved, and nothing gets more personal than family drama ā thatās just a fact. (Kardashians, anyone?)
Two, this is shonen ā openly bad guys being the protagonists isnāt often done (in mainstream at least).
Three: we need some material to make all those āIzukuās related to All for One or One for All first userā for our satisfaction before Horikoshi josses the whole thing, okay??
(no, this is certainly not a call for you to make more āIzuku is related to original two brothersāā¦ but itās heavily suggested lol)
Thank you for sticking around until the end of this essay! Have a cookie, and enjoy the hell my mind led me to during the binge-read of the last 5 released chapters of manga:
#bnha meta#mha meta#quirk analysis#quirk meta#ofa and afo#shigaraki tomura#all for one#midoriya izuku#one for all#one for all users#I need more bnha meta#crossposted on ao3
17 notes
Ā·
View notes