#slbm systems

[stone-cold-groove]

Front cover: UNIVAC Defense System’s CP-890 shipboard computer brochure - 1967.

[usafphantom2]

SR-71 could sneak into a denied area, get the take and leave before our enemy even knew we were there 🇺🇸🇺🇸

The SR-71 was never successfully intercepted by surface-to-air missile or aircraft.

It had a state-of-the-art electronic defensive system which would defeat an incoming missile’s homing and steering. Some of these techniques are still highly classified.

Detectors on board would alert the crew of a missile launch instantly and, since the SR-71 did not normally fly at its maximum speed or altitude, the aircraft’s defense was simultaneously to jam the missile’s guidance while accelerating, climbing, and turning with 45º of bank.

No surface-to-air missile could out-turn, thus hit, an SR-71, a fact demonstrated many times, especially during the Vietnam War. Attempts to shoot down an SR-71 continued until August 25, 1981, which was the last time an enemy (North Korea) fired a surface-to-air missile at an SR-71; that mission was flown by Maury Rosenberg, pilot, and Ed McKim, Reconnaissance Systems Officer (RSO).

We carried an array of sophisticated sensors and recorders which could glean reconnaissance data with cameras capable of high-quality photographs horizon-to-horizon. We also had radar imagery capable of one-foot resolution. This was the Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System (ASARS), which could deliver readable radar pictures night or day, bad weather or clear.

The SR-71 also carried electronic intelligence (ELINT) systems which are still classified. We advertised that the SR-71, within 24 hours notification, could be over any target on earth and be capable of surveying 100,000 square miles of terrain each hour. It was no idle boast.

I’ll summarize the importance of the SR-71 missions by quoting Paul Crickmore, noted aviation historian and Blackbird author, in a letter to me.

“In theatre, the SR-71 proved the concept of high-Mach, high-altitude flight, to obtain vital aerial reconnaissance. The SR-71 regularly conducted reconnaissance missions in the skies over North Vietnam – particularly around Hanoi in 1968-70 which at the time, was the most highly defended area on the planet.”

“The Blackbirds provided superior flexibility compared to satellites, time after time, specific examples—Yom Kippur War 1973, Yemen 1979, Cuba 1977—1990, Lebanon October 1983 (following the truck-bomb attack killing over 240 US Marines), Libya 1986, The Persian Gulf 1987, but perhaps most importantly, the on-going monitoring of Soviet nuclear submarine fleets for the US Navy—particularly the Northern Fleet with their submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), capable of hitting large areas of the United States, as well as all Allied Countries.”

BC Bredette B C Thomas

Posted by Linda Sheffield

@Habubrats71 via X

[redarmyscreaming]

The Martin P6M SeaMaster, was a 1950s strategic bomber flying boat for the United States Navy that almost entered service; production aircraft were built and Navy crews were undergoing operational training, with service entry expected in about six months, when the program was cancelled on 21 August 1959. Envisioned as a strategic nuclear weapon delivery system for the Navy, the SeaMaster was eclipsed by the Polaris submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM). Due to the political situation at the Pentagon, the Navy promoted the P6M primarily as a high speed minelayer.

[kim19901190]

👄 Presidents, Other Liars, and the First Amendment. In A Right to Lie?

YOU LABELED ME, I'LL LABEL YOU 💋💋💋

🍾🥂🍾 Champagne socialist. This is me, 1990 🥐🍗🥐

👑👑👑 How much does the US president have to personally pay for? Does he have to buy his own suits?

🍔🍟🥓 What flag is in the Oval Office?

Each president has decorated the Oval Office to suit his tastes. Among the features that remain constant are the white marble mantel from the original 1909 Oval Office, the presidential seal in the ceiling, and the two flags behind the president's desk--the U.S. flag and the President's flag.

Taking into account a Treaty on Strategic Offensive Arms, the sides have continued negotiations to achieve a separate agreement concerning the ABM Treaty building on the language of the Washington Summit Joint Statement dated December 10, 1987. Progress was noted in preparing the Joint Draft Text of an associated Protocol. In connection with their obligations under the Protocol, the sides have agreed in particular to use the Nuclear Risk Reduction Centers for transmission of relevant information. The leaders directed their negotiators to prepare the Joint Draft Text of a separate agreement and to continue work on its associated Protocol.

The Joint Draft Treaty on Reduction and Limitation of Strategic Offensive Arms reflects the earlier understanding on establishing ceilings of no more than 1600 strategic offensive delivery systems and 6000 warheads as well as agreement on subceilings of 4900 on the aggregate of ICBM and SLBM warheads and 1540 warheads on 154 heavy missiles.

The draft Treaty also records the sides' agreement that as a result of the reductions the aggregate throw-weight of the Soviet Union's ICBMs and SLBMs will be reduced to a level approximately 50 percent below the existing level and this level will not be exceeded.

[finowings12]

SLBM NSE- What is SLBM NSE in Stock Market

What is SLBM in Stock Market? A Comprehensive Guide to SLBM NSE

1. Introduction to SLBM in Stock Market

1.1 Decoding the SLBM Full Form

SLBM Full Form stands for Securities Lending and Borrowing Mechanism. It is a structured platform where investors can lend their idle securities to borrowers in return for a lending fee, while still retaining ownership rights such as dividends and voting.

1.2 Importance of SLBM in Modern Financial Markets

SLBM plays an instrumental role in enhancing market efficiency. It offers liquidity, facilitates short selling, and reduces settlement failures. In developed economies, SLBM is a cornerstone of financial innovation, and India's adoption is gradually aligning with global standards.

2. SLBM NSE: An Institutional Overview

2.1 What is SLBM NSE?

SLBM NSE refers to the platform provided by the National Stock Exchange of India for executing securities lending and borrowing transactions. This centralized ecosystem ensures transparency, standardization, and risk containment.

2.2 The Role of NSE in Facilitating SLBM

The NSE acts as the facilitator and regulator, offering an electronic order-matching system, margining frameworks, and standardized contracts. Clearing and settlement are handled by NSCCL (National Securities Clearing Corporation Limited), which guarantees the integrity of every transaction.

3. Functionality of SLBM

3.1 Core Mechanism: How SLBM Works

In SLBM, a lender lends securities for a predetermined tenure. The borrower, usually looking to short sell or hedge, returns the securities before or on the expiry date. The lender earns a lending fee, while the borrower benefits from temporary access to the securities.

3.2 Key Stakeholders in SLBM Transactions

Participants include retail and institutional lenders, traders or institutions as borrowers, clearing corporations, and custodians. The clearing corporation acts as the counterparty for both lender and borrower, thereby neutralizing default risk.

4. Eligibility Criteria and Stock Selection

4.1 Stocks Eligible under SLBM NSE

Only highly liquid and stable securities—typically from the F&O segment—are permitted on the SLBM NSE platform. These are stocks with significant market capitalization, robust trading volumes, and consistent investor interest.

4.2 Criteria for Lenders and Borrowers

Lenders can be retail investors, domestic institutions, or foreign portfolio investors. Borrowers are usually traders or institutions needing securities for short-term strategies. All participants must be KYC-compliant and route transactions through registered intermediaries.

5. The SLBM Trade Lifecycle

5.1 Initiation, Execution, and Settlement

A borrower initiates a request for specific securities via the SLBM NSE portal. The lender matches the request, following which the clearing corporation facilitates the transfer. The settlement cycle generally follows a T+1 basis for execution.

5.2 Early Recall and Return Provisions

Lenders have the right to recall securities before the maturity date, subject to market conditions. Similarly, borrowers may return the securities early, closing their positions. These flexibilities improve market responsiveness and participant satisfaction.

6. SLBM as a Revenue and Strategy Tool

6.1 Lending: Passive Income Potential

Long-term investors often have idle securities in their portfolio. SLBM enables these holders to earn extra income through lending fees without selling their holdings, thus optimizing portfolio returns.

6.2 Borrowing: Short Selling and Arbitrage

Borrowers use SLBM primarily to implement short-selling strategies. It is also utilized in arbitrage, hedging, and settlement liquidity strategies. SLBM offers a compliant, low-risk framework for executing these advanced trading maneuvers.

7. SLBM vs Traditional Short Selling

7.1 Structural Differences

Traditional short selling often lacks transparency and exposes lenders to significant counterparty risks. In contrast, SLBM NSE provides a structured and monitored environment with robust compliance mechanisms.

7.2 Transparency and Risk Mitigation

The SLBM platform ensures full transparency in lending rates, tenure, and availability. Real-time reporting, collateralization, and regulated intermediaries offer a significantly safer alternative compared to off-market lending.

8. Regulatory Framework of SLBM

8.1 SEBI Guidelines

SEBI governs all aspects of SLBM, from participant eligibility to stock selection and settlement protocols. The regulatory framework ensures systemic safety while encouraging broader market participation.

8.2 Role of Clearing Corporations

The NSCCL acts as the central counterparty in every SLBM transaction. It ensures the transfer of securities and funds, collects margins, and mitigates counterparty risk through rigorous surveillance and daily mark-to-market adjustments.

9. Risks and Safeguards in SLBM

9.1 Collateralization and Margining

Borrowers must deposit adequate margins—both initial and mark-to-market—to secure borrowed securities. This margin is dynamically adjusted, ensuring lender protection against market volatility.

9.2 Default Risk and Counterparty Protection

To address default scenarios, SLBM incorporates risk containment mechanisms including replacement cost recovery, penalty impositions, and collateral liquidation. The clearing corporation's central counterparty role further fortifies transaction integrity.

10. Future of SLBM in India

10.1 Growing Participation and Market Depth

As awareness of SLBM in the stock market grows, institutional and retail participation is rising steadily. SLBM is poised to become an indispensable tool for passive income and hedging alike.

10.2 Technological Advancements and Global Trends

Future developments may include integration with international markets, blockchain-based settlements, and inclusion of ETFs and bonds in the SLBM ecosystem. These enhancements will align SLBM India with global best practices and improve its strategic relevance.

Conclusion

SLBM NSE is a paradigm shift in India's financial market architecture. It bridges the gap between passive investing and active market engagement, facilitating both liquidity and strategy in a transparent manner. With robust regulations, expanding participation, and technological evolution, SLBM is set to redefine how securities are utilized in the Indian stock market.

[finowings2]

What is SLBM in Stock Market- SLMB NSE

What is SLBM in Stock Market? Stock markets are not just about buying and selling shares; there are several mechanisms in place that allow investors to make the most of their portfolio. One such mechanism is SLBM, short for Stock Lending and Borrowing Mechanism. If you’ve ever wondered what is SLBM in stock market, this article breaks it down for you in a simple and informative way.

Understanding SLBM SLBM is a facility that allows investors to lend or borrow shares for a certain period through a regulated platform. It’s similar to lending money, but instead of cash, investors lend their shares. This concept is particularly useful for traders who want to short-sell shares that they don’t own.

Lenders earn an additional income from idle shares in their demat account, while borrowers get access to stocks they wish to short. It’s a win-win situation when used strategically.

How SLBM Works in NSE The SLBM NSE platform allows this mechanism to operate in a safe and transparent manner. NSE (National Stock Exchange) has laid down specific rules and timelines for stock lending and borrowing. The entire process is cleared and guaranteed by NSCCL (NSE Clearing Corporation Limited), which minimizes counterparty risk.

Here’s how it works:

Lenders place an offer to lend their stocks via their broker. Borrowers place a request to borrow specific stocks. If the bid and offer match, the transaction is executed for a defined tenure (usually from one day up to 12 months). At the end of the tenure, stocks are automatically returned to the lender, and the borrower settles the contract. Benefits of SLBM Extra Income: Investors earn lending fees on idle shares. Short Selling Opportunity: Borrowers can short stocks even without owning them. Hedging and Arbitrage: Traders use SLBM to create various strategies, including hedging and arbitrage. Regulated Framework: SLBM on NSE is backed by a regulated system, offering security and transparency. Eligibility and Settlement To participate in SLBM NSE, both the lender and borrower must have a demat and trading account with a registered broker offering SLBM services. The securities eligible for lending and borrowing are listed by the NSE and mainly include stocks from the F&O (Futures and Options) segment.

The settlement in SLBM is done through T+1 or T+2 cycle, depending on the transaction, and the process is fully automated through the clearing corporation.

Key Takeaways SLBM stands for Stock Lending and Borrowing Mechanism. It allows lending and borrowing of shares for a fixed period. SLBM is available on major exchanges like NSE in India. It benefits both long-term investors (through additional income) and traders (by enabling short selling). The platform is safe, regulated, and overseen by clearing corporations like NSCCL.

Conclusion: Now that you know what is SLBM in stock market, consider whether lending your idle shares or borrowing for short-term strategies could be a fit for your investment approach. For the latest updates and expert insights on SLBM NSE, stay connected with Finowings – Giving Wings To Your Finance.

[velvialifestylesummit]

The impotence of NATO in providing new troops to tackling the deficiency of soldiers for Ukraine under the gallant participation of local tenacious women in supporting the military troops against the intrusion of Russia should be considered for picking up a prestigious experienced military woman candidate to lead the Pentagon as evinced by the military contributions of General Jennie Carignan from Canada might help resolve the sceptical appointment for the position of Defense Secretary at the Pentagon. Due to the military dilemma of Kyiv, the Canadian Armed Forces led by General Jennie Carignan is suggested to help manoveure the women troops of Ukraine in fortifying Kyiv against the intrusion of Russia. The slumbering consensus of America is supposed to accept the war protocol for military operations in Ukraine via the deployment of super carriers in Black Sea for WWIII. The slumbering presidency of Trump needs to admit the nullification of hegemony under the siege of BRICS. The fiasco of Biden Presidency to ruin the projected hegemonic recalibration without the corresponding hawk tactics for the military escalation of WWIII tends to be another scandalous duplicity of America hampering the necessary deployments of the air defence system and SLBM in Black Sea for WWIII. The highly sceptical appointment of a childish nominee to succeed the position of Lloyd Austin as the next secretary of the Pentagon could induce decisive impeachment to the slumbering presidency of Trump. An ascending naval operation of Pentagon should at this time be submitted by Lloyd Austin to the Whitehouse for the hegemonic recalibration of America in Borneo instead of conducting bravado operations in the South China Sea and the strait of Taiwan amid the maturity of WWIII in 2024. It is the ultimatum for the readiness of colossal military operations in the Asia Pacific region. It is not the timing for business as usual as expected by the unrealistic fainthearted truce resolution of Trump to avert the looming outbreak of WWIII in the world under the longstanding colonisation of hidden civilisation on Earth.

[samacharapp]

Pakistan New Missile: Pakistan launched SMASH killer missile, how big a threat is it for India? Know here

Pakistan has successfully tested its indigenous ship-launched ballistic missile, which is capable of attacking sea and land. However, India is ready to counter this missile. 

Pakistan New Missile: Pakistan recently successfully tested an indigenous ship-launched ballistic missile with a range of 350 kilometers. This missile is capable of hitting both land and sea targets. This test is part of Pakistan's effort to strengthen its strategic capabilities and strike a military balance with India. However, the Indian Navy is already prepared to face such threats.

Pakistan has launched an indigenously developed ship-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) after decades. It is a ship-launched ballistic missile. This missile can strike up to a distance of 350 kilometers. This capability can be a threat to India's western region and Indian Navy ships. This missile can be launched from ships deployed in the sea, which enables it to attack marine and terrestrial targets with precision.

Strategic importance

Ballistic missiles from ship-launched platforms provide Pakistan with a second-strike capability in case of war. This is a new strategic challenge for India.

Danger for India?

Pakistan's new missile can target Indian Navy's warships and coastal areas. Especially in the Arabian Sea, Indian ships and important economic assets can be at risk. This missile of Pakistan can have the capability to carry nuclear weapons. Due to which it can prove to be more dangerous. This missile can carry out precise attacks on both land and sea, due to which the security of India's maritime border can become the biggest challenge.

How is India's preparation?

India has state-of-the-art air defense systems like the S-400 Triumph, which can intercept ballistic missiles. The Indian Navy's submarines and ships are far more advanced and well-equipped than Pakistan. Nuclear submarine platforms like INS Arihant make India capable and strong at sea.

News is originally taken from: https://bit.ly/49aAX5t

Samachar App: watch the live latest news of India and the world, business updates, cricket scores, etc. Download the Samachar App now to keep up with daily breaking news.    Like and Follow us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

[angrybell]

US land based nukes, Minuteman III, are at the end of their useable life for a variety of reasons. We think they will work. There are 400 in silos with another 50 kept ready to be deployed.

The submarine based ones should be ok. The SLBM of choice for the US is the Trident II D5, which began to be deployed in the 1990s. The USN did an upgrade program on them starting in 2002. We have around 300 missiles. Because they can have MIRV warheads the USN has about 1900 or so warheads to mount on them.

The Trident is a new design based on technology from the late 90s and early 2000s and can be intregrated into modern systems fairly easily. The Minuteman III is based off tech from the 1970s. The operating system still requires floppy disks (as in the old 5.25 inch not the ones that are used as the scar icon on a lot of office programs).

There is currently a program to produce new ICBMs for the USAF. Right now it’s designated the LGM-35A Sentine. It’s supposed to be start reliving the first missiles in 2029.

The US also maintains gravity nuclear bombs. Mostly it’s the B-61, which was originally fielded in 1968 and has been upgraded a number of times since then. The Biden Administration decided to phase another model, B-83, in favor of an upgrade to the B-61 to B-61 mod 12 version. The B-61 can be carried on the B-2, B-21, B-52, F-35, F-15E, and F-16. So even if all else fails, you can take an F-16 and lob a few.

The USAF also has an air launched nuclear cruise missile, the AGM-86. These are getting older since they were first deployed in the Reagan administration. There’s about 500 right now. The USAF looks like it’s going to replace those with a nuclear variant of long-range standoff cruise missile (LRSO). The B-52 is the primary system that uses them right now but the ISAF says it’s now going to be shared by the B-21.

TL/DR: US retains a credible nuclear arsenal and is the midsts of replacing old weapons with newer ones.

“Careful everyone, if Ukraine keeps defending itself, Russia will use its nukes and start WW3!!!”

The Russian nukes in question:

[skyfire85]

-A YP6B-1 on beaching gear . | Photo: US Navy/Martin Photograph

FLIGHTLINE: 125 - MARTIN P6M SEAMASTER

The P6M SeaMaster was one of a group of seaplanes proposed in the early 1950s to allow the US Navy to have a strategic nuclear bombing role.

In April of 1951, the US Navy proposed creating a “Seaplane Striking Force” that could participate in both nuclear and conventional warfare, as well as reconnaissance and mine-laying. Being seaplanes, this force would be mobile, and would have essentially unlimited and indestructible runways, and would (coincidentally) allow the Navy to claw back some prestige from the USAF’s SAC, which monopolized the US nuclear strategic role with its fleets of B-29, B-36, B-47, B-50 and B-52 bombers after WWII.

Convair, a merger of Consolidated and Vultee) supplied two fighter concepts to the SFF, the XFY-1 Pogo VTOL and the XF2Y-1 Sea Dart seaplane, as well as the XP5Y patrol bomber flying boat, which was later reworked into the R3Y-1 Tradewind cargo/troop carrier. All four planes suffered from either airframe or engine issues (or both) however, and none were successful.

-Composite photo of Convair's SSF aircraft . | Graphic: Justin Gibb

The Glenn L Martin Company, meanwhile, submitted a swept wing, jet-powered flying boat which shared the all-flying T tail of its XB-51 bomber, as well as the rotating bomb bay which was practically a Martin signature. Power was to be provided by the P&W J58 (yeah, same as the OXCART/YF-12/SR-71), though the (much) less powerful Allison J71-A-4 engines were used on the initial XP6M-1 prototypes.

-The first XP6M-1 being rolled out . | Photo: Martin/USN photo

The first flight of the XP6M-1 was on 14 July 1955, and test flights showed promise, however they also showed that the engines were placed too close to the fuselage, and that engaging the afterburners would scorch the plane. The first SeaMaster was destroyed on 7 December 1955 (seriously, not a good date for the USN), when the controls malfunctioned and the horizontal tail went full up. The airplane broke apart at 5,000 feet after being subjected to a 9 g outside loop, crashing into the Potomac River and killing the crew of four.

-An XP6M-1 in flight, circa 1955 . | Photo: Martin/US Navy

The second XP6M-1 first flew on 18 May 1956, but crashed on 9 November after an elevator jack failed at 21,000 feet, putting the plane into a nose up climb similar to the accident that claimed the first SeaMaster. The crew were unable to bring the nose back down, and ejected.

-A YP6M-1 taking off . | Photo: Martin/US Navy

The modified YP6M-1 first flew in January 1958, followed by five more. At this point, testing was moved to Harvey Point, and the aircraft were fitted with test versions of the full combat suite, and were used for bombing, mine laying and recon evals. This test phase revealed severe issues with the -1, including reliability issues with the J71 engines, spray ingestion at higher weights, and a tendency to porpoise at certain trim settings. At this point, the P6M-1 program was cut, and Martin and the Navy began work on an improved version.

The P6M-2 would be an operational aircraft, and featured a switch to P&W J75 engines, an aerial refueling probe as well as a buddy refueling system, improved avionics and a redesigned canopy for better visibility. The first was rolled out early in 1959, and three were built by that summer. The -2 aircraft were quick, capable of Mach 0.9 on the deck, and ruggedly built, with skin thicknesses of over 1 inch at the roots. The change in engines however had induced serious control and maneuverability issues, with the new airplanes experiencing compressibility above Mach 0.8, resulting in rapid changes in directional trim, severe buffeting, and wing drop which required high control inputs to counter. Martin was sure it could iron out these issues, but in August the Navy informed Martin that the P6M was canceled, and that all development work was to cease. The program was behind schedule and over budget, and by this point the Navy was no longer interested in the SFF; with the USS George Washington, armed with the first SLBMs, set to enter service in December of that year, the time for the SeaMaster had run out.

-A P6M-2 loaded on to the beaching trolley . | Photo: Martin/US Navy

-Final production model SeaMaster, showing "buddy" refueling drogue . | Photo: Martin/US Navy

-The Sea Masters outside the Martin factory. | Photo: Martin/US Navy

Martin attempted to interest airlines in the P6M, offering an enlarged passenger version called the Model 307 ‘SeaMistress’, but there were no takers, and the remaining P6Ms were scrapped.

-Models of the Model 307 Sea Mistress and P6M Sea Master . | Photo: Glenn L Martin Aircraft

-Artist’s impression of the Model 307 . | Illustration: Glenn L Martin Aircraft

The SeaMaster was Martin’s last airplane, which abandoned aircraft for missiles and electronics. Martin merged with American Marietta Corp in 1961, forming Martin Marietta, which built missiles and rockets, including the AGM-12 Bullpup, the Titan family of ICBMs and space launch vehicles, the Atlas launch vehicles (acquired from General Dynamics) and the Viking, Magellan, and Mars Polar Lander space probes. Martin Marietta also produced paints, dyes, metallurgical products, construction materials, and other goods, as well as the Monorail (there should be a link to the Simpsons' Monorail song here, but the Hyphen doesn't handle YT links right to do that...) for Walt Disney World. The company was acquired by Lockheed in 1995, though it later spun off Martin Marietta Materials as a separate company.

[stone-cold-groove]

A page from UNIVAC Defense System’s CP-890 shipboard computer brochure - 1967.

[usafphantom2]

SR-71 could sneak into a denied area, get the take and leave before our enemy even knew we were there 🇺🇸🇺🇸

The SR-71 was never successfully intercepted by surface-to-air missile or aircraft. It had a state-of-the-art electronic defensive system which would defeat an incoming missile’s homing and steering. Detectors on board would alert the crew of a missile launch instantly and, since the SR-71 did not normally fly at its maximum speed or altitude, the aircraft’s defense was simultaneously to jam the missile’s guidance while accelerating, climbing, and turning with 45º of bank. No surface-to-air missile could out-turn, thus hit, an SR-71, a fact demonstrated many times, especially during the Vietnam War. Attempts to shoot down an SR-71 continued until August 25, 1981, which was the last time an enemy (North Korea) fired a surface-to-air missile at an SR-71; that mission was flown by Maury Rosenberg, pilot, and Ed McKim, Reconnaissance Systems Officer (RSO).

We carried an array of sophisticated sensors and recorders which could glean reconnaissance data with cameras capable of high-quality photographs horizon-to-horizon. We also had radar imagery capable of one-foot resolution. This was the Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System (ASARS), which could deliver readable radar pictures night or day, bad weather or clear. I’m no photo interpreter, but even I could tell what was pictured. The SR-71 also carried electronic intelligence (ELINT) systems which are still classified. We advertised that the SR-71, within 24 hours notification, could be over any target on earth and be capable of surveying 100,000 square miles of terrain each hour. It was no idle boast.

I’ll summarize the importance of the SR-71 missions by quoting Paul Crickmore, noted aviation historian and Blackbird author, in a letter to me.

“In theatre, the SR-71 proved the concept of high-Mach, high-altitude flight, to obtain vital aerial reconnaissance. The SR-71 regularly conducted reconnaissance missions in the skies over North Vietnam – particularly around Hanoi in 1968-70 which at the time, was the most highly defended area on the planet.”

“The Blackbirds provided superior flexibility compared to satellites, time after time, specific examples—Yom Kippur War 1973, Yemen 1979, Cuba 1977—1990, Lebanon October 1983 (following the truck-bomb attack killing over 240 US Marines), Libya 1986, The Persian Gulf 1987, but perhaps most importantly, the on-going monitoring of Soviet nuclear submarine fleets for the US Navy—particularly the Northern Fleet with their submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), capable of hitting large areas of the United States, as well as all Allied Countries.”

BC Bredette B C Thomas

Posted by Linda Sheffield

@Habubrats71 via X

[fuckyeahmarxismleninism]

In the case of the E-6s, “it's a message to the small group of adversaries with SLBMs and ICBMs,” Hogan noted. The Pentagon apparently wants atomic-armed rivals of the United States—Russia, China and North Korea—to know that America’s nuclear command system is intact, even if the commander-in-chief might be sick.

U.S. imperialism never quarantines.

[nicholassabalos]

From beneath the sea....

PACIFIC OCEAN (February 12, 2020) -- An unarmed Trident II (D5LE) submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) launches from submerged United States Navy Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine USS Maine (SSBN 741) off the coast of San Diego, CA.

                                            USS Maine (SSBN 741)

The successful missile launch demonstrated the readiness of USS Maine’s (SSBN 741) strategic weapon system and crew following the submarine’s recently-completed major overhaul.

When armed, the Trident II missile pictured here emerging from beneath the sea can carry up to 14 massive long-range independently- (and very precisely-) targeted nuclear weapons....and is a key element of the U.S. strategic nuclear triad....strengthening U.S. strategic deterrence.

(In plain language....these missiles are so powerful, accurate and nasty....they are designed to prevent war....and almost demand peace.)

                                                  *          *          *          *

                                   United States Strategic Nuclear Triad

The pluses (left columns) and minuses (right columns) of the United States nuclear triad -- manned bombers, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM), and submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBM).

                                        ________________________

>>Note: Everything discussed above is from UNCLASSIFIED sources, readily found in public forums.

>>Top photo: Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Thomas Gooley, USN

[spaceexp]

Why Submarines for North Korea's Missiles

Sydney, Australia (SPX) Oct 02, 2019 The recent test launch of a North Korean Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missile (SLBM) could be framed as just another event in a recent surge of new weapons test by the state. North Korea has conducted a flurry of missile launches in recent months, marking the debut of some new weapons that could possibly avoid Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) systems in nearby states. But all of these earlier Full article

[howwelldoyouknowyourmoon]

After Sun Myung Moon’s help, North Korea Launch an SLBM Missile on October 2, 2019

▲ On October 2, North Korea conducted an underwater launch of its new Pukguksong-3 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) off the coast of Wonsan. The two-stage, solid-fuel missile flew on a steep, upward trajectory, reaching a peak altitude of 950 km, and landing about 450 km from the launch point. If the Pukguksong-3 had used a standard trajectory, it would have overflown Japan and covered 1,900 to 2,000 km, making it the longest-range solid-fuel missile North Korea has tested to date.

Full story of the launch: https://www.38north.org/2019/10/melleman100319/

____________________________________

How did Sun Myung Moon help?

Robert Parry: “The Rev. Sun Myung Moon’s business empire, which includes the right-wing Washington Times, paid millions of dollars to North Korea’s communist leaders in the early 1990s when the hard-line government needed foreign currency to finance its weapons programs, according to U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) documents.

The payments included a $3 million “birthday present” to current communist leader Kim Jong Il and offshore payments amounting to “several tens of million dollars” to the previous communist dictator, Kim Il Sung, the documents said.

Moon apparently was seeking a business foothold in North Korea, but the transactions also raised potential legal questions for Moon, who appears to have defied U.S. embargos on trade and financial relations with the Pyongyang government. Those legal questions were never pursued, however, apparently because of Moon’s powerful political connections within the Republican power structure of Washington, including financial and political ties to the Bush family.

Besides making alleged payments to North Korea’s communist leaders, the 86-year-old founder of the South Korean-based Unification Church has funneled large sums of money, possibly millions of dollars, to former President George H.W. Bush.

One well-placed former leader of Moon’s Unification Church told me that the total earmarked for former President Bush was $10 million. The father of the current U.S. President has declined to say how much Moon’s organization actually paid him for speeches and other services in Asia, the United States and South America. ...

In 1988, when then-Vice President Bush was trailing early in the presidential race, the Times spread a baseless rumor that the Democratic presidential nominee Michael Dukakis had undergone psychiatric treatment. The Moon-affiliated American Freedom Coalition also distributed millions of pro-Bush flyers.

The elder George Bush personally expressed his gratitude. When Wesley Pruden was appointed The Washington Times’ editor-in-chief in 1991, Bush invited Pruden to a private White House lunch “just to tell you how valuable the Times has become in Washington, where we read it every day.” [Washington Times, May 17, 1992].

Moon’s Vatican

While Bush was hosting Pruden in the White House, Pruden’s boss was opening his financial and business channels to North Korea. According to the DIA, Moon’s North Korean deal was ambitious and expensive.

“There was an agreement regarding economic cooperation for the reconstruction of KN’s [North Korea’s] economy which included establishment of a joint venture to develop tourism at Kimkangsan, KN [North Korea]; investment in the Tumangang River Development; and investment to construct the light industry base at Wonsan, KN. It is believed that during their meeting Mun [Moon] donated 450 billion yen to KN,” one DIA report said.

In late 1991, the Japanese yen traded at about 130 yen to the U.S. dollar, meaning Moon’s investment would have been about $3.5 billion, if the DIA information is correct.

Moon’s aide Pak denied that Moon’s investments ever approached that size. Though Pak did not give an overall figure, he said the initial phase of an automobile factory was in the range of $3 million to $6 million.

The DIA depicted Moon’s business plans in North Korea as much grander. The DIA valued the agreement for hotels in Pyongyang and the resort in Kumgang-san, alone, at $500 million. The plans also called for creation of a kind of Vatican City covering Moon’s birthplace.

“In consideration of Mun’s [Moon's] economic cooperation, Kim [Il Sung] granted Mun a 99-year lease on a 9 square kilometer parcel of land located in Chongchu, Pyonganpukto, KN. Chongchu is Mun's birthplace and the property will be used as a center for the Unification Church. It is being referred to as the Holy Land by Unification Church believers and Mun [h]as been granted extraterritoriality during the life of the lease.”

Moon, North Korea & the Bushes By Robert Parry (Originally published on October 11, 2000) LINK below

______________________________________

FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) – Rev. Moon’s Submarines, Sold to Kim Jong-Il, Empower a Nuke Threat to the West Coast by John Gorenfeld (Where in Washington, D.C. Is Sun Myung Moon? 8/3/04).

Rev. Sun Myung Moon’s Unification Church, which controls the right-wing Washington Times, directly helped North Korea obtain the means of threatening the continental United States with nuclear weapons, government documents indicate. Jane’s Defense Weekly (8/4/04), as summarized by Reuters (8/3/04), is reporting: North Korea is deploying new land- and sea-based ballistic missiles that can carry nuclear warheads and may have sufficient range to hit the United States.... The two new systems appeared to be based on a decommissioned Soviet submarine-launched ballistic missile, the R-27.... Communist North Korea had acquired the know-how during the 1990s from Russian missile specialists and by buying 12 former Soviet submarines which had been sold for scrap metal but retained key elements of their missile launch systems. 

And how did North Korea get these submarines? Gorenfeld calls attention to Defense Intelligence Agency documents originally obtained by investigative reporter Robert Parry through the Freedom of Information Act: In Jan 94, a Japanese trading company “Touen Hoji,” in Suginami-Ku, Tokyo, purchased 12 F and G class submarines from the Russian Pacific fleet headquarters. These submarines were then sold to a KN [North Korean] trading company. Although this transaction garnered a great deal of coverage in the Japanese press, it was not disclosed at the time that Touen Shoji is an affiliate of the Unification Church [now known as the Family Federation for World Peace and Unification].

______________________________________

The first paragraph is probably from Jane’s Defence Weekly - 4 August 2004 edition

“...The second event occurred during September 1993, when the Korean People’s Navy (KPN) signed a contract with the Toen Trading Company of Tokyo to buy 12 decommissioned Russian Foxtrot-class (Project 641) and Golf II-class (Project 629A) submarines for scrap metal. The Golf IIs were equipped to carry three R-21 (SS-N-5 Sark/Serb) SLBMs, although neither the missiles nor the electronic firing systems were included with the scrapped vessels. Due to factors such as the time and expense of their removal, these boats retained significant elements of the missile launch system, including their launch tubes and stabilisation subsystems. This technology, in combination with the R-27 design, ...”

from Jane’s Defence Weekly - 4 August 2004 edition “... provided the KPN [Korean People’s Navy] with elements crucial to the subsequent development of a submarine or ship-mounted ballistic missile system. ... It is unknown if the DPRK [North Korea] has sold, or attempted to sell, this new system to any of its previous ballistic missile customers. Iran, however, would appear to be the ideal customer for both the land and sea-based versions, given its requirement for a system capable of striking Israel from the security of its own territory.”

______________________________________

Evidence that Moonies Jump-Started the North Korean Nuclear Program that Now Threatens the US

Sun Myung Moon’s dealings with North Korea

Moon, North Korea & the Bushes By Robert Parry   (Originally published on October 11, 2000)

Dear Leader’s Paper Moon by John Gorenfeld

The Moons with Kim Il-sung. What was the price for this meeting?

Images show North Korea’s ‘submarine ballistic missile programme’

SAR Imagery Reveals the Presence of Concealed Submarine at North Korea’s Sinpo Naval Base

North Korea’s Submarine Ballistic Missile Program Moves Ahead

Sun Myung Moon was building an “Interreligious” facility in North Korea in 2004

Sun Myung Moon was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002