#sean shanahan

[bottomseareef]

Oh my god this kiss animation is so cute

[thebottomseareef]

And since I was talking bad endings a while back with @sorcerous-caress I decided to do a voice claim for Bad Ending Sean Shanahan

Again from Assassin’s Creed it’s the voice of Jack the Ripper from Syndicate

[bottomseareef]

Sean NEEDS a found family not involved in armed conflict

I was gonna go with sudden responsibility of a child but in a weird way I think that’d make him worse. I’m assuming it’s an Ellie and Joel situation so he would be way more violent more often lmao.

[bottomseareef]

Tav Romance Chart Remastered Version!

Remastered by the great @sorcerous-caress and I’m tagging them in this again

[thebottomseareef]

I know I’ve already posted a voice claim of Sean Shanahan but sometimes the fact he has an Irish accent slips my mind so I imagine him both as Irish and as English so I wanted to do one with an English accent

Once again a character from Assassin’s Creed, Jacob Frye from Syndicate (yes I know it’s the same photos as last time I don’t take many photos)

[hockeytown-gifs]

Good Game, Good Vibes - Detroit Red Wings 2002-2003

[bottomseareef]

For my Tavs: Sean, Bayarmaa, and Minerva

oc asks: not-so-nice edition

alone: How does your OC deal with loneliness? Have they ever been completely alone before? How do they act when there's no one around to see them?

betrayal: Has your OC ever been betrayed by someone they thought they could trust? Has your OC ever betrayed someone who trusted them?

bound: Has your OC ever been imprisoned or captured? What happened? How did they get out? Did the experience leave any scars?

break: What would cause your OC to break down completely? What do they look like when that happens? Has anyone ever seen them at their lowest?

desire: What's one thing your OC wants more than anything in the world? Are they open with that desire? Why or why not? What would they do to fulfill it?

failure: What's your OC's greatest failure? Have they been able to move past it? Does anyone else know about it?

fear: What is your OC's greatest fear? What do they do when confronted with it? Are they open with their fear, or do they hide it away?

future: What's the worst possible future for your OC? Are they taking steps to avoid that outcome? Are they even aware it's a possibility?

ghost: Who or what haunts your OC? What happened? How do they live with their ghosts?

guilt: What is your OC guilty about? How do they handle their guilt? Do they try to avoid guilt, or do they accept it?

hate: What does your OC hate? Why? How do they act towards the object of their hatred?

heartbreak: Have they ever had a relationship that ended badly? Experienced some other kind of heartbreak? What happened?

hide: What does your OC hide? Why do they hide it?

hunt: Who or what is your OC hunted by? A person, a feeling, a past mistake? Is your OC able to let their guard down, or are they constantly alert?

mask: Does your OC wear a mask, literally or figuratively? What goes on beneath it? Is there anyone in their life who gets to see who they are under the mask?

midnight: What keeps your OC up at night? Do they have nightmares? Fears? Anxieties? What do they do in the small hours of the morning when they should be sleeping?

mistake: What's the worst mistake your OC ever made? What led to them making it? Have they been able to fix it? How have they moved on?

monster: Is your OC monstrous in any way? Is there something that makes them monstrous? Are they aware of their own monstrosity? Do they accept it or reject it?

nightmare: What does your OC have nightmares about? How do they deal with their nightmares? Do they tell people, or keep it to themself?

pain: What's the worst pain your OC has ever felt? Do they have a high pain tolerance?

secret: What's one secret your OC never wants anyone to know about them?

skin: How comfortable is your OC in their skin? Do they grapple with anything that lives inside them—a beast, a curse, a failure, a monster? How do they face the smallest, weakest, most horrible version of themself? Are they able to acknowledge it at all?

torture: Has your OC ever been tortured? Would your OC ever torture someone else?

wound: How does your OC handle being wounded? Are their wounds mostly physical? Mental? Emotional? What's the worst wound your OC has ever experienced?

[lafbnetwork]

Jimmy Garoppolo Takes Shot At Former Teams; Rams "Do It In The Right Way"

Jimmy Garoppolo‘s journey through the NFL is a circuitous one. From backing up the GOAT to starting for the San Francisco 49ers to the IR and back, and then back to the IR, then benched in Las Vegas. Now, Garoppolo finds himself on the Los Angeles Rams, (a team he has beaten 8 of 9 times) returning to a backup role behind Matthew Stafford. Garoppolo really has seen it all. Having been a part of…

[frontproofmedia]

The Revolution of Motion Offense in Today's NFL

By Joseph Correa

Follow @Frontproofmedia!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?'http':'https';if(!d.getElementById(id))(document, 'script', 'twitter-wjs');

The Strategic Implementation of Motion Offense

The concept of motion offense in the NFL is not just about the physical movement of players but is deeply rooted in strategic manipulation of the defense. At its core, motion offense involves shifting players, particularly wide receivers or running backs, just before the snap. This movement serves several purposes: it can reveal the defensive scheme, create mismatches in coverage, and disrupt the defensive alignment.

Coaches like Kyle Shanahan of the San Francisco 49ers, Sean McVay of the Los Angeles Rams, and Mike McDaniel of the Miami Dolphins are at the forefront of this strategic evolution. While the principle of motion offense is consistent, its application varies significantly among these coaches, each tailoring the strategy to their team's strengths and their opponent's vulnerabilities.

Disrupting Defensive Schemes:

Motion offense is particularly effective against rigid defensive structures. By moving a key offensive player, offenses can force the defense to reveal whether they are in man-to-man or zone coverage. This knowledge is invaluable for the quarterback, as it can dictate play calls and passing routes. The movement often leads to defensive players being momentarily out of position, creating opportunities for big plays.

Creating Mismatches:

One of the primary goals of motion offense is to create favorable matchups. For instance, moving a speedy receiver across the formation might draw a linebacker into coverage, a matchup heavily favoring the offense. This manipulation allows teams to exploit the weakest links in the defense.

Utilizing Player Skills:

Motion offense also allows teams to maximize their players' specific skills. A player like Tyreek Hill, known for his extraordinary speed, can be even more effective when his pre-snap motion leads to confusion or hesitation in the defense. The strategy turns player attributes like speed or agility into strategic advantages.

Variations and Innovations:

While the basic concept of motion offense is relatively straightforward, its execution can be remarkably diverse. Some teams use it to stretch the defense horizontally, creating wide gaps in coverage. Others use it vertically, drawing defenders deep to open up short and intermediate routes. Each coach adapts the concept to their offensive philosophy and the unique talents of their players.

Motion Offense in Practice: A Statistical Perspective

To truly appreciate the impact of motion offense strategies in the NFL, it's crucial to delve into the statistics that underscore their effectiveness. Teams that have embraced this approach are changing the game's dynamics and registering significant improvements in their offensive output.

1. Impact on Passing Efficiency:

Teams utilizing motion offense tactics frequently exhibit improved passing efficiency. For instance, teams like the San Francisco 49ers and Miami Dolphins have been observed to have higher yards per pass attempt and completion rates when employing pre-snap motion. This improvement is attributed to quarterbacks being better informed about defensive alignments and exploiting the resultant mismatches.

2. Enhancing Run Game Effectiveness:

Motion offense isn't just beneficial for passing plays. It has also been shown to bolster the running game. By shifting defensive focus and creating uncertainty, running backs can find more gaps and mismatches in the defense. This strategic movement increases yards per carry and overall rushing yards for teams heavily utilizing motion.

3. Overall Offensive Output:

Teams with high-motion offense usage tend to exhibit better overall offensive performance. This is reflected in key metrics like total yards per game, points per game, and third-down conversion rates. These statistics highlight motion offense's comprehensive impact on a team's ability to sustain drives and score.

4. Comparative Analysis of Teams:

A comparative analysis of teams with high and low-motion offense usage reveals stark differences. Teams like the Dolphins, 49ers, and Rams, known for their frequent use of motion, consistently rank higher in offensive efficiency metrics than teams that use motion less often. This correlation underscores the strategic value of motion offense in modern NFL playbooks.

Pre-Snap Motion Usage:

The Miami Dolphins led the NFL with an 83.3% rate of using pre-snap shifts or motion, creating space and confusion among defenses​​.

The Miami Dolphins and San Francisco 49ers are 1-2 in the league in pre-snap motion plays. The Dolphins utilize motion in 79.9% of their plays, while the 49ers use it in 79.3% of their plays​​.

Offensive Performance:

In terms of total offense, the Dolphins were ranked first with an average of 409.2 yards per game and 59 offensive touchdowns, followed by the 49ers with 404.6 yards per game and 58 touchdowns​​.

Regarding passing offense, the Dolphins again led with an average of 271.7 passing yards and 29 passing touchdowns. The 49ers were second with 263.1 yards and 32 touchdowns​​.

Rushing Offense and Scoring:

The Dolphins ranked fifth in rushing offense with 137.5 yards per game and 26 rushing touchdowns, while the 49ers were third with 141.5 yards and 25 touchdowns​​.

In scoring offense, the Dolphins were first with an average of 30.1 points scored and a total of 59 touchdowns. The 49ers closely followed with 29.4 points and 58 touchdowns​​.

Red Zone and Third Down Efficiency:

The 49ers led in red zone touchdown rate at 65.6%, with the Dolphins closely behind at 64.9%​​.

In third-down offense, the 49ers had a conversion rate of 47.3%, placing them fourth in the league, with the Dolphins at 42.2%​​.

These statistics demonstrate the significant impact of motion offense strategies on a team's overall performance, particularly in the case of teams like the Miami Dolphins and San Francisco 49ers. The high percentage of pre-snap motion plays correlates with top rankings in key offensive metrics, showcasing the strategy's effectiveness in both passing and rushing, as well as in scoring and efficiency in critical game situations. This data-driven approach underscores the transformative power of motion offenses in the modern NFL.

Tactical Variations and Coaching Innovations in Motion Offense

In the NFL, the strategic implementation of motion offense varies significantly among teams, reflecting each squad's unique philosophies and player strengths. This section explores how various coaches have innovatively adapted motion offense to enhance their team's performance.

Tailoring Strategies to Player Strengths:

Each team uses motion offense to maximize their roster's unique capabilities. For instance, the Miami Dolphins leverage the exceptional speed of players like Tyreek Hill to create vertical threats, while the San Francisco 49ers focus on horizontal displacement to exploit their players' yards-after-catch (YAC) abilities.

Coaching Philosophies in Play:

Coaches like Kyle Shanahan and Sean McVay have incorporated motion offense as a cornerstone of their strategies. Shanahan's approach with the 49ers often involves using motion to create mismatches and open up underutilized spaces on the field. Conversely, McVay uses motion to alter defensive angles and leverage, particularly in the run game.

Evolution of the Motion Offense:

Over recent seasons, motion offense has evolved from a niche tactic to a widespread strategy. Teams are continually finding new ways to implement motion, whether it's through jet sweeps, reverse motion, or innovative play designs that keep defenses guessing.

Future Trends and Potential Adaptations:

As more teams adopt and adapt motion offense strategies, we may see further evolution in how motion is used. This could include integrating technology for more precise play-calling or developing new formations that maximize the benefits of pre-snap motion.

Defensive Adaptations to Motion Offense

As motion offense strategies become more prevalent in the NFL, defenses are evolving in response. Defensive coordinators are now tasked with developing schemes that can effectively counter motion offense's unpredictability and strategic advantages.

Enhanced Defensive Flexibility: Defenses are training to become more versatile, emphasizing the ability to quickly adapt to shifts in offensive formations. This includes developing players proficient in both coverage and run defense, blurring the traditional roles of defensive positions.

Predictive Analytics and Technology: Teams increasingly rely on advanced analytics and real-time data to predict and counter-offensive plays. This involves analyzing tendencies and patterns in opponents' use of motion to anticipate their strategies during games.

Strategic Personnel Changes: Defenses also respond by recruiting and developing players with specific skill sets designed to counter motion offenses, such as defensive backs with exceptional speed and linebackers who excel in coverage.

Long-Term Impact and Future of Motion Offense in the NFL

The rise of motion offense in the NFL will likely have lasting effects on various aspects of the game, from player development to scouting and coaching strategies.

Influence on Player Development: Colleges and high schools may start placing a greater emphasis on training players in skills that complement motion offense strategies, such as agility, speed, and quick decision-making.

Scouting and Recruitment: The criteria for scouting and recruiting players may shift, with a heightened focus on versatile players who can adapt to the dynamic nature of motion offense.

Coaching and Strategy Evolution: As motion offense continues to evolve, we may see the emergence of new offensive philosophies and playbooks that further push the boundaries of traditional football strategies.

The Transformative Power of Motion Offense in the NFL

As we've explored, motion offense has become a pivotal element in the modern NFL, significantly influencing offensive play and defensive strategy. Its rise underscores a league constantly adapting, innovating, and evolving. Coaches like Kyle Shanahan, Sean McVay, and Mike McDaniel are at the forefront of this revolution, pushing the boundaries of traditional football strategy.

This evolution in offense is changing how games are played and impacting player development, scouting, and coaching philosophies. As NFL teams continue to adapt and innovate, motion offense strategies are set to play a crucial role in shaping the future of football.

From revealing defensive schemes to creating mismatches and enhancing player skills, the strategic use of motion offense has proven to be a game-changer. As the league progresses, we can expect further advancements in offensive play and defensive countermeasures. The NFL's continuous adaptation to motion offense is a testament to the dynamic and ever-evolving nature of the sport, promising a future rich in strategic complexity and excitement.

Feature Photo: (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

[bottomseareef]

Tav Meme: Tav-ppets take Manhattan Baldur’s Gate

Sean, Bayarmaa (me), Sol ( @sorcerous-caress ), Issal, and Khal’ian ( @gith-zeri ) hit the town

Now I’m thinking that this alternate universe where all our Tavs are hanging around is just a mockumentary

[fatehbaz]

Woah. Not exaggerating: The very same week you tagged me here, I was submitting a final draft paper about spectacle and British use of animal imagery and caricatures of South Asian resistance, especially on stages and in "ethnographic" exhibitions. Part of this involved the weaponization of spectacle, media, and public display. And part of this involved British imagination of "exotic" animals. And the article shown here kinda invokes both of those subjects.

That afternoon, I had been reading through a 2012 article with new-to-me info about the staging of theatre-esque mass trials/executions of Thugee by British administrators 1820s-1850s. (More on that below.)

In the pictured article/link shown here, similarly, Shanahan describes fig trees and mass hangings of Indian rebels. He lists about a dozen instances of when British authorities used fig trees to perform quasi-ritualized mass executions between 1806 and 1871.

Among them, he notes two in particular:

1857, hanging 144 rebels from a single tree in Nanaro Park at Kanpur (Shanahan cites a T!mes of !nd!a article, which itself cites a history department professor at Christ Church College)

March 1860, hanging 257 rebels from a single tree in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh, in retaliation for their revolt in May/June 1857, when rallying under Khan Bahadur Khan (Shanahan again cites T!mes of !nd!a, who cite an ancient history and culture professor at Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University)

---

The same afternoon you tagged me, I was straight-up reading:

Maire ni Fhlathuin, "Staging Criminality and Colonial Authority: The Execution of Thug Criminals in British India." Nineteenth Century Theatre and Film, Volume 37, Issue 1, October 2012.

She "examines the staging and response to the public executions of thugs, focusing on the British authorities' 'scripting' of the execution ritual (as documented in East India Company records and the writings of the officials involved) to include [...] the crowd's appreciation of the eradication of that criminality."

---

British animalization and/or dehumanization in depictions of South Asia, what they both call "interspecies/multispecies empire," more directly explored by Rohan Deb Roy (insects/bugs in India) and Jonathan Saha (elephants/cattle in Burma). But another thing I had been referencing in my own little paper was British fixation on re-enacting the defeat of Indian rebels, which you might especially notice in stage plays about Tipu Sultan (the "Tiger of Mysore" beaten by "the British bulldog," defeated in 1799, who became the central villain/character of multiple spectacular and popular plays in London from 1790s-1830s, to such an extent that British schoolchildren decades later would still understand references to villianous "Tipu"; and historian Daniel O'Quinn, who's written much about British popular discourses about crises in the Age of Revolutions, called the plays comparable to "precinema"; after his defeat, the East India Company could secure sandalwood resources and perform sweeping cartographic surveys for land/revenue administration). Probably worth noting nineteenth-century Britain played host to the explosion of newly-affordable mass-market print media of all kinds; recalcitrant South Asian rebels show up in stage, sportsmen's magazines, travel literature genre, novels, etc.

On the subject of weaponizing newly-emergent media, the author linked/pictured here (Shanahan) too, also lists in his bibliography:

Sean Willcock. "Aesthetic Bodies: Posing on Sites of Violence in India, 1857-1900." History of Photography, Volume 39 (2015), Issue 2, pages 142-159.

Abstract includes: "This article looks at how aesthetic concerns inflected the dynamic of imperial relations during the 1857 Indian Uprising and its aftermath. The invention of photography inaugurated a period in which aesthetic imperatives increasingly came to structure the engagement of colonial bodies with the traumas of warfare in British India. The formal conventions of image-making practices were not consigned to a discreet virtual sphere; they were channelled into the contested terrains of the subcontinent through the poses that figures were striking for the camera. I trace how one pictorial convention - picturesque staffage - had the capacity to engender politically and psychologically disruptive tableaus on the contested terrains of empire, as colonial photographers arranged for Indian figures to pose on landscapes that were marked by disturbing wartime violence."

---

And finally, another of his citations includes:

Kim A Wagner. "'Calculated to Strike Terror': The Amritsar Massacre and the Spectacle of Colonial Violence." Past & Present, Volume 233, Issue 1, November 2016, pages 185-225.

And in her article, Wagner describes:

"Closely following the ritual model provided by judiciary practices in the imperial homeland, the British in India nevertheless favoured hanging [...] Controlling the symbolism of public executions, however, proved increasingly difficult within a colonial context, and the hanging of hundreds of highway robbers known as Thugs during the 1830s had fully exposed the porous nature of colonial rituals of power. The Thugs signally failed to conform [...]. [T]hey [...] climbed the scaffold and [...] tightened the noose around their own neck and then simply stepped off the platform [...]. As regiment after regiment broke out in mutiny across northern India during the summer of 1857, [...] the colonial state thus unleashed its entire arsenal of exemplary violence. [...] [A]nd it was in that context that the first mass execution of forty sepoys by cannon had been ordered in Peshawar on 13 June 1857 [...]. This was only the first of many such mass executions [...]. A contemporary British newspaper report elaborated on the cultural specificity of the ritual enacted in Peshawar: You must know that this is nearly the only form in which death has any terrors for a native … he knows that his body will be blown into a thousand pieces, and that it will be altogether impossible for his relatives, however devoted to him, to be sure of picking up all the fragments of his own particular body [...]. Execution by cannon could thus be presented as both justified and civilized or, as Lord Roberts put it, ‘Awe inspiring, certainly, but probably the most humane, as being a sure and instantaneous mode of execution’. [...] In the House of Commons, Lord Stanley expressed this sentiment in no uncertain terms: ‘Only by great exertions - by the employment of force, by making striking examples, and inspiring terror, could Sir J. Lawrence save the Punjab; and if the Punjab had been lost the whole of India would for the time have been lost with it’.

---

I do kinda wonder if, sometimes, contemporary people, today, might think: "Well, maybe we're unfairly retroactively ascribing motivations of malice to nineteenth-century imperial administrators. And even if they were sometimes spiteful or horrifically violent to that extent, surely they probably exercised discretion; they couldn't have been too explicit." But then you read about them performing executions by shooting cannonballs at groups of people. Or you read the words of major popular, industrial, or political figures casually describing this kind of thing when speaking directly to the public, the newspapers, or the House of Commons (you can read plenty more scary, explicit comments like this from other officials and administrators in all kinds of institutions).

As Shanahan describes here in "Trees of life that became agents of death," British administrators (and media in the metropole, too) whether deliberately or otherwise, manipulated or employed animals and plants in the popular conciousness; whole bunch of writing elsewhere about British fixation on "man-eating" tigers, lions, crocodiles, mosquitoes, flies, etc., and appropriating creatures (like appropriating fig trees in Shanahan's reading). Or idealization of the same and other creatures, like celebrating rubber, sugarcane, elephants, etc. Dovetails with long history of picturing and/or harnessing "tropical nature" in US, British, and European imaginaries.

[teekays]

also whenever the topic of sean avery comes up im legally required to make sure everyone thinks about brendan shanahan calling him puppy

[fishstickmonkey]

Shanahan said on an episode of the “Impact Theory” podcast posted Tuesday. “Do we trust Trump in his personal sincerity to do the right thing for our country, to end chronic disease, balance the budget, end these forever wars? Is he somebody that is going to continue to invite people like Bobby and me into the conversation?

No, he's going to use you just like he did Sean O'Brien.

[bottomseareef]

For Tav 1 (Sean Shanahan) and Tav 2 (using their surname Viriplaca as a way to identify her for now since her first name is still pending)

sixty-nine more questions for your ttrpg characters!

(i originally made one of these on a defunct sideblog; i thought it was about time i made a new one! send an oc’s name and a number, go wild!)

-

1. what drives them? what’s their ultimate goal?

2. what was your original concept for this character? how did playing them change that concept?

3. can they accept failure?

4. what one person, place, or thing do they love more than anything else?

5. is there something they want to be known for?

6. how have they changed in the last year? how about the last five years?

7. there’s a magic item (or technological innovation, or special resource) made just for them—what is it?

8. what songs remind you of them? if there are specific lyrics or movements, list ‘em!

9. when in their life were they most scared?

10. what inspired this character’s creation?

11. if they have a pet or animal companion, how do they spend time with them? if they don’t have one, what sort of animal would they be interested in raising, if any?

12. how have they altered their body? piercings, tattoos, biohacks, or other modifications—anything. why (or why not) did they (or someone else) make those changes?

13. what are some motifs you associate with them? did you intentionally bring in those motifs, or did it happen over time?

14. what keeps them up at night?

15. is there something that never fails to make them laugh?

16. do they value their appearance?

17. they’re crying—what did it take to make them cry?

18. what dish brings back the best memories for them?

19. what sparks genuine, unadulterated rage in them?

20. what attracts them to someone—platonically and/or romantically, anything counts.

21. do they have an idea about how they’ll die? do you?

22. how would they decorate their living space, if they had a chance?

23. in what moment did they consider themselves to be “grown up”?

24. are they close to any family members?

25. who is their best friend?

26. what type of person pisses them off?

27. how do they usually dress? why do they dress the way they do?

28. do they collect anything?

29. what feelings do they internalize?

30. how do they handle confrontation?

31. do they respond well to praise? how about criticism?

32. which of your decisions led to their voice being the way it is?

33. what artistic medium are they most drawn to?

34. what languages do they speak? how did they learn them?

35. when did they feel loneliest?

36. how do they fidget?

37. if they’ve had one, what was their first kiss like?

38. do they see themselves as an important part of their party?

39. are they insecure about their appearance? how about their personality? what aspects specifically worry them?

40. if you had to remake this character right now, how would you change them?’

41. how do you keep notes for this character, if at all?

42. can they dance?

43. how much do they know about the world they live in?

44. what lies do they tell others?

45. what lies do they tell themselves?

46. have they taught themselves any skills just for fun?

47. what could they talk about for hours on end?

48. do they relate to anyone in their group? conversely, which person do they relate to the least?

49. how often do they cut their hair, if at all?

50. do they have a go-to beverage, alcoholic or nonalcoholic?

51. what element of their backstory are you proudest of?

52. how would they dress themselves up for a formal event?

53. do they keep their plans close to their chest?

54. how important is money in their life? do they save up for ages, or spend quickly?

55. they’re seeing their greatest wish come true—what’s happening?

56. who would they trust with their life, unequivocally?

57. do they see value in the laws of where they live?

58. how often do they swear? do they mind when others swear?

59. what’s an element of their philosophy that you disagree with?

60. what do they have faith in? what keeps them believing?

61. is there an in-game moment of theirs you think about and just laugh?

62. do they believe in good and evil?

63. what’s a meme or tiktok or vine (or whatever) that you associate with them?

64. how would a party member describe them?

65. what would their go-to karaoke song be?

66. which fruit do they like most?

67. do they consider themselves to be special?

68. where’s their home?

69. what’s one secret they don’t want getting out?

[thebottomseareef]

First actual post about my Tav, Sean Shanahan, lol. I’m probably not gonna post much about him on here at least I’ll probably do that more on my main blog. I mentioned in the Tav as companion questions that I did for @sorcerous-caress that I thought Shay Cormac from Assassin’s Creed Rogue was his voice claim since Assassin’s Creed was a big inspiration for the character. Shay was one character that I drew some inspiration from, alongside Ezio, Arno, Basim, and Conner, but Shay isn’t the main one he’s just the only one that was Irish so he’s the only one with a voice that fit lmao. Also ignore the bad images of him this is a new playthrough and I don’t take much pictures of him so I just hoped on and quickly took some.

[hockeytown-gifs]

Bench scenes - Wings vs Stars - Nov. 3, 2002