#revenue deficit

[moleshow]

Genuine question, is there anything about your city’s infrastructure/architecture that you particularly like (aside from it being where you live)?

here i assume you're referring to chicago. i will go to bat for this city. my complaints are largely a lot of inside baseball. i use sweeping complaints as shorthand--when i say something is ass it's because i want that thing to improve. if i really thought it was a lost cause i wouldn't talk about it. this is why i do not complain about schaumburg

continued below the cut

architecturally i think you could hardly do much better. there's a great blend of landmark-tier buildings from a range of eras. this is the thompson center, a really phenomenal train station/govt services building combo

but also some amazing residential buildings, like the commodore:

and i mean this is a stock photo from around the bryn mawr stop but i can confirm that it is this dope.

in terms of infrastructure, the thing is: it's good relative to the rest of the US. if we're talking about planning, about doing it RIGHT though we've got our priorities jumbled. see look

we put 8 lanes of high speed traffic between the city and the lakefront for most of its length. this is an idiotic choice to have made and it's frankly a huge waste of what could be really good land use.

urban highways

transit access west of western ave and south of 33rd is poor

the illinois dept. of transportation's standards mean that every road they control is a nightmare. this is slowly turning around though and legislation is moving ahead to allow cdot to have control over its own roads (in part i think because the IL courts are currently working through some cases regarding whether or not the city/state can be sued for fatalities resulting from poor road design)

good lird

but we DO have trains. now, because we've had poor leadership at the CTA reliability has suffered in a manner i can only describe as "bigly", particularly along the blue line. but we've had service cuts basically through the whole network

we also have lots of buses but we only just started to come around to the photo-enforced bus lanes idea. this is to say the problem is we let buses get stuck in traffic. generally the city's leadership has been keen to make it easier and cheaper to drive through the city. this is stupid for a variety of reasons that i won't get into here

i'm losing steam on this train of thought because it's fairly complex stuff and the north/south/west sides all have unique land use concerns. so without further questions i'll stop there.

one last thought

i don't like logan square because i think the people who live there are annoying podcaster instagram upcycled secondhand clothing types, the housing is expensive because it's trendy, and land use sucks ass west of the kennedy expressway

this is a train station and transfer point for a few major bus routes

[cvctuslesbian]

people are aware that social media websites are going to be forever money sinks, right? like there is never any possibility for a social media website to get into the black, let alone green. you will never be able to turn a single cent of profit from a social media website

[mercoglianotrueblog]

Is BTC a danger to the USD

#BTC towards $100,000,#altcoins don't..#tax evasion prob

#gold,#Bitcoin may take #USD place,#silver next record

#US military expenses+ less #revenues=#deficit,#debt explosion

#Russia legalized cypto

#Policymarket #bettors: BTC next #US #reserve currency

https://salvatoremercogliano.blogspot.com/2024/11/is-btc-danger-to-usd.html?spref=tw

[primepaginequotidiani]

PRIMA PAGINA Le Figaro di Oggi venerdì, 11 ottobre 2024

[indianahal]

The US. government has placed new generations of Americans in financial peril because of their out-of-control spending.  The congress has crossed over the $33 trillion threshold of debt.  In recent months the debt is accelerating with over $1 trillion added almost every three months.  Spending is out running revenues by such a huge margin that the ratio of public debt to GDP cannot be maintained.  My new video looks at this, and also how the non-stop printing of money is weakening the value of the dollar worldwide.

[financeprozone]

Massive £3.5K Tax Hike Looms for UK! Shocking IFS Report!

UK households are bracing for a substantial tax hike, with an average increase of £3,500 per year anticipated by the next election, marking the most significant fiscal burden over a parliamentary term in over seven decades, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), the country’s foremost economic think tank.

For more visit: financeprozone.com -

[liberalsarecool]

We have a tax revenue problem created and made worse by Republican tax cuts.

We have a deficit built almost entirely on Republican borrowing.

Trump's four years alone added $8 TRILLION.

Keep in mind, Trump claimed he would eliminate the deficit.

Several months before the 2016 election, Trump pledged he would be able to eliminate the national debt – then around $19 trillion – “over a period of eight years.” Oct 27, 2020

[notayesmanseconomics]

France is beginning to face the consequences of its debt burden

France is making the news at the moment in a variety of ways. The clearest is the protests against the raising of the state pension age from 62 to 64. As a Londoner I also note the 90% vote against rental e-scooters in Paris as to be frank they have become a public nuisance in my area via the way the business model encourages users to leave them anywhere which more than a few take very literally.…

[the-bibrarian]

I see a lot of incomprehension online about our pension reform and the anger it generates in France, and what it often boils down to is "why are they so angry, 64 is plenty young to retire?"

I don't agree, but even if I did I would still oppose the reform. Here are some of the reasons why:

We already need 43 full years of work and tax contributions to be able to retire. Which means college-educated people were never going to retire at 64 anyway, let alone 62. This reform is aimed at people who start working early, mostly in low-paying jobs.

There's very little provision made in this law for hard/dangerous/manual labour.

There's no provision made for women who stop working to raise their children (51% of women already retire without a "complete career," which means they only retire on a partial pension, vs. 25% of men).

At 64, 1/3 of the poorest workers will already be dead. In France, between the richest and the poorest men, there's a 13 years gap in life expectancy.

Beyond life expectancy, at that age a lot of people (especially poorer, non-college educated) have too many health-related issues to be able to work. Not only is it cruel to ask them to work longer, if they can't work at all that's two more years to hold on with no pension

Unemployment in France is still fairly high (7%). Young people already have a hard time finding work, and this is going to make things even harder for them

Macron cut taxes on the rich and lost the country around 16 Billions € in tax revenue. Our estimated pension deficit should peak at 12 Billions worst case scenario.

While I'm on wealth redistribution (no, not soviet style, but I think there should be a cap on wealth concentration. Nobody needs to be a billionaire.): some of the massive profits of last year should go to workers and to the state to be redistributed, including to fund pensions. The state subsidized companies and corporations during the pandemic, Macron even said "no matter the cost" and spent 206 Billions € on businesses. Now he's going after the poorest workers in the country for an hypothetical 12 Billions??

Implicit in all of this is the question of systemic racism. French workers from immigrant families are already more likely to have started their careers early, to have low-paying jobs, are less likely to be college-educated, more at risk for disabilities and chronic illnesses, etc., so this is going to disproportionately affect them

This is not even touching on the fact that he didn't let lawmakers vote on it, meaning he knew he wouldn't get a majority of votes in parliament, or that 70% of the population is against this law. Pushing it through anyway is blatant authoritarianism.

TL;DR: This is only tangentially about retirement age. The reform will make life harder for people with low incomes, or with no higher education, for manual workers, for women—mothers especially, for POC, for people with disabilities or chronic conditions, etc. This is about solidarity.

Hope (sincerely) this helps.

[robertreich]

The Truth About Immigrants and the Economy

Immigrants are good for the economy and our society! Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

For centuries, immigration has been America’s secret sauce for economic growth and prosperity.

But for just as long, immigrants have been an easy scapegoat.

One of the oldest, ugliest lies is to falsely smear immigrants as criminals.

It’s just not true. Crime is way down in America. Anyone who says otherwise is fearmongering.

And whatever crime there is is not being driven by immigration. Immigrants, regardless of citizenship status, are 60% less likely to be incarcerated for committing crimes than U.S.-born citizens.

Maybe that’s why border cities are among America’s safest.

Immigration opponents also claim immigrants are a drag on the economy and a drain on government resources.

Rubbish!

Quite the opposite, the major reason immigrants are coming to America is to build a better life for themselves and their families, contributing to the American economy.

The long-term economic benefits of immigration outweigh any short-term costs. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that adding more immigrants as workers and consumers — including undocumented immigrants — will grow America’s economy by about $7 trillion over the next decade. And those immigrants would increase tax revenue by about $1 trillion, shrinking the deficit and helping pay for programs we all benefit from.

Immigrants of all statuses pay more in taxes than they get in government benefits. Research by the libertarian Cato Institute found first-generation immigrants pay $1.38 in taxes for every $1 they receive in benefits,

This is especially true for undocumented immigrants, who pay billions in taxes each year, but are excluded from almost all federal benefits. After all, you need documentation to receive federal benefits. Guess what undocumented immigrants don’t have. Hello?

And of course, one of the most common anti-immigrant claims also isn’t true.

No. Immigrants are not taking away jobs that Americans want. Undocumented immigrants in particular are doing some of the most dangerous, difficult, low-paying, and essential jobs in the country.

Despite what certain pundits might tell you, immigration has not stopped the U.S. from enjoying record-low unemployment.

And as the Baby Boom generation moves into retirement, young immigrants will help support Social Security by providing a thriving base of younger workers who are paying into the system. The fact that so many immigrants want to come here gives America an advantage over other countries with aging populations, like Germany and Japan.  

What’s more, immigrants are particularly ambitious and hardworking. They are 80% more likely to start a new business than U.S. born citizens. Immigrant-founded businesses also impressively comprise 103 companies in last year’s Fortune 500.

And immigrants continue to add immeasurably to the richness of American culture. We should be celebrating them, not denigrating them.

It’s time to speak the facts and the truth. We need immigrants to keep our economy — and our country — vibrant and growing. They are not “poisoning the blood” of our nation. They’re renewing and restoring it.

[allthecanadianpolitics]

The impact of service cuts needed, if TransLink can’t address a looming operating deficit, could end up costing Metro Vancouver households, the region’s mayors say. That figure was drawn from a report presented to the Mayors’ Council on Regional Transportation on Thursday, based on an estimated $1 billion annual hit to the region’s economy in the event drastic service cuts are implemented. TransLink says it is facing a $600-million funding gap starting in 2026. The budget shortfall is a result of falling gas tax revenue, fare hikes that haven’t kept pace with inflation and the growing cost of labour, fuel and maintenance. “The reality is that TransLink is faced with a significant funding shortfall, a structural deficit that is based on a very out-of-date funding model,” mayors’ council chair Brad West said. “And the worst thing that could happen to young people who depend upon transit is to have the service significantly reduced and that’s what’s on the table.”

Continue Reading.

Tagging: @newsfromstolenland

[beesmygod]

hiveworks:

-ignored me when i tried to warn them about kinomatika, a serial scam artist, and more or less affirming that their abuse toward me (which i did not detail or disclose to them, i focused on the financial facts) was monetarily justified

-used me as an unpaid consultant for 7 years, including picking out the CEO's outfits, website design, and advice. all unpaid.

-disclosed to me the personal lives and habits of other comic artists despite me literally never asking. if youve ever done anything unflattering in front of xel, then i heard about it. for some reason

-tried to repeatedly impress me or....something by constantly sending me updates about their lastest frivolous purchases or big financial deal or total revenue i would mysteriously never see the results of even in the form of trying to improve hive itself

-desperately wants to be thought of as a leftist collective despite their reliance on advertising and financial focus. they are not a collective or community. its an advertising agency with perks, if youre already making money

-had to be begged to have my website added in a timely manner after i was accepted and was at the bottom of the "to-do" pile from that point on. refused to work with me when flash was becoming depreciated. i wanted to either change it to html5 or, barring that, replace the flash video with a youtube embed. for some reason they refused to do this. now that have access to my backend again i can do it myself in like a few minutes lol.

-right before i left, they nuked the group/official discord and started imposing incredibly stupid rules bc adults were having too many emotions where they could see it

-are objectively wrong about piracy and the preservation of digital media, taking a firm "anti" stance until they realized it was morally unpopular. this extends to the members, who chronically petrified at the actually delusional belief that people are pirating them to such a degree that it causes a financial deficit

-the way they talk about their audiences is putrid. like theyre constantly angry at the attention and praise they've gone out of their way to cultivate. a common refrain was "you dont owe your audience anything" which is literally and demonstrably not true lol.

-barely paid me 100 dollars a month for this

toward the end of my run, other artists started bitching that i was making hive look bad "because it reflects back on them" so i left. upon realizing and being told i was representing the company that treated me like this, i was offered an out and took it. as a gift to them, primarily.

bad company. didnt like it.

[centrally-unplanned]

remember when the trump admin/paul ryan tried doing entitlement reform and it went nowhere? that was pretty funny

Oh yeah, I remember! Voters didn't, obviously, sucks for them I guess. I currently lean towards Trump having "learned his lesson" combined with him being economically illiterate such that the current admin won't repeat that mistake - they will keep middle class welfare, and instead just cut taxes anyway and expand the deficit, while using cuts in aid to the poor and tariffs to "plug the revenue gap" in at least a branding sort of way. Bad for the country obviously, but maybe it will be easier electorally.

Paul Ryan is always amusing to me as a deeply pathetic political figure. The dumb man's smart guy, he was culmination of Bush-era Republicanism right as it was dying away - still fanatically devoted to tax cuts as the north star of all political ambition, still interested in the veneer of being a responsible elder statesman, but now part of a party that absolutely could not be bothered with the actual requirements of the latter. So he would go through all of this rigmarole of making "serious" budget proposals that were built on completely fabricated data like massively inflated GDP growth or magical efficiency gains in spending to show how his proposals would be deficit neutral, just for them to be shot down.

Then first the tea party, and later Trump comes along and goes "my dude, no one gives a shit about any of that. What are you doing? Even your lies reek of nerdy loserdom", and over time he is simply discarded. Now he does all the non-jobs retired politicos get; board member here, non-profit senior advisor there, etc. Fake responsibilities for a fake man; someone who wore the mask so long he can't even remember his face.

Hilarious that, relative to the current crop, I kinda miss him.

[primepaginequotidiani]

PRIMA PAGINA Le Figaro di Oggi giovedì, 10 ottobre 2024

[allthebrazilianpolitics]

Brazil rolls out minimum tax on profits of multinational firms

Brazil's government late on Thursday published an executive order that effectively rolls out a minimum 15% tax on profits of multinational corporations, a publication in the country's official gazette showed.

Brazil's government has been seeking new sources of revenue to meet fiscal targets that include reducing its fiscal deficit to zero, while being loath to adopt broad spending cuts. It says the new move is in line with global efforts to combat tax evasion.

The executive order sets an additional levy on Brazil's social contribution tax on corporate income (CSLL) to make sure the minimum taxation stands at 15%, according to the publication.

Continue reading.

[qqueenofhades]

JSYK the OP of the Crab Day post is a self-identified conservative Christian. Can't speak to anything she may have done or said, but I do know that Crab Day wouldn't actually fix Tumblr - the site is running a 30mil *deficit,* which is different from debt. All Crab Day would do would be telling staff that their current policies get users to send them more money, which doesn't actually change anything. Corporations change only when their business strategy is losing the shareholders money.

Gotta be honest, my friend, I'm... not sure what you're trying to do here? Warn me that the original post was made by a Problematic Person (tm) and therefore that must mean it's all wrong, or.... what?

We know that Tumblr badly needs money, because they have told us that and openly admitted that the unpopular new changes were spurred by a need for increasing revenue. I logged on just now on desktop and got a suggestion that I could purchase an ad-free browsing subscription to help support the hellsite (which is the word they used, because they have very much embraced the joke). I have in fact already bought an ad-free subscription, both because I like the product Tumblr provides and want to keep using it in its current form, and because it makes my mobile experience immeasurably nicer. I am well aware that especially in this era of social media sites dropping like flies, the continued existence of a platform that is 30-million-dollars underwater (however you want to split hairs about exactly how) is not a guarantee. And we all complain about Tumblr, but we have all been here a long time (me, uh, over 10 years), we have a solid community, there's no other alternative that's really ever come up or gotten the same kind of uptake, and if it went under, we would be uh, screwed.

Tumblr is kind of a mess, it's the antithesis of every social media site, and it doesn't (for now) have the crap that makes The Artist Formerly Known As Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram so utterly unusable, or if it does, you can (mostly) turn it off. That's why we all like it and why, even if we are resolutely anti-capitalist gremlins who resist being marketed to with every fiber of our being, it doesn't change the fact that servers, staff, and all the rest cost real human-people money which the site, by their own frank admission, is struggling to raise. Even if staff does often make crappy updates, they generally at least TRY to listen to us and include a feature to make it optional or roll it back, unlike certain unnamed idiot billionaires. Their mockery of other social media sites can sometimes be a little much, but for now, Tumblr is pretty much the last place on the internet that does what it does, and I like it that way. If it went under and took my blog of 10+ years and all my friends with it, I would be incredibly sad.

That being the case, and basic financial realities being what they are, encouraging people to toss a few bucks at a TOTALLY OPTIONAL and fun gimmick that increases functionality for a product we like is actually not a bad thing. TumblrMart has crabs, checkmarks, Ea-Nasir merchandise (seriously), ad-free browsing, etc., and if our choice is voluntarily supporting the site through fun (and again, OPTIONAL) purchases versus having us all be involuntarily subject to some horrible data-scraping mechanism or forced off altogether because they couldn't keep the lights on, that is fine with me. Nobody is making anybody do or buy anything. But if you like the product Tumblr provides and want a fun material way to show your appreciation, then I don't think it's some Great Transgression to participate in that.