Avoidant Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Research
I am an undergraduate student in the psychology and human development program at Prescott College. I am conducting, alongside Dr. Sebastienne Grant, a research study to investigate avoidant restrictive food intake disorder presentation across socioeconomic status. I’m recruiting individuals to participate in this study. If you are over eighteen years old and interested, please fill out the survey linked below. Once you have completed the survey, I will contact you for additional information and inform you if you have been selected as a candidate; you will also be contacted if you are not selected. If you agree to be a participant, you will be asked to participate in a recorded face-to-face interview for up to one hour. To participate, you should have a working webcam and agree to keep it on for the entire duration of the interview. Interview recordings will be destroyed promptly after the research paper is finalized. In this interview, you will be asked personal questions about your life, experience with ARFID, and other related topics. Your privacy is very important, and all identifiable information disclosed will remain confidential. All identifiable information will be stored in an encrypted file and flash-drive and will not be included in the research report. Your participation in this study is voluntary. There are no repercussions for choosing not to participate in this study. Your participation in this study will help bring more attention and understanding to the experiences and challenges of individuals living with ARFID. Increasing understanding can have positive benefits for not just you but for all people who live with ARFID.
If you are interested, please fill out the survey below, and if you would like more information, please contact
[email protected].
1 note
·
View note
hot take but like why are we as a society still using lead in manufacturing processes in 2024...
anyway tldr of this is that you are not being exposed to lead unless the circular piece on the bottom of the cup is damaged. so, owning a cup like this will likely not result in lead exposure. this is similar to the fact that in older housing where lead paint has been painted over in subsequent decades, and that paint is in good condition, then it is not a risk. lead based paint only becomes an issue when it is deteriorating (chipping, cracking, peeling, chalking, etc) or being turned into dust during renovation activites. so yeah, in a similar way--you aren't going to get lead poisoning unless the steel compontent on this water bottles comes off.
but also this article says that these lead pellets that are used in the cups are an "industry standard" and i'm like: why? WHY is it industry standard in 2024? at least with lead pipes and lead based paint, we're just dealing with issues from prior decades. but this is current so there is a conscious decision to still use lead in products. also, i don't know enough about this subject (bottle manufacturing) to know why they prefer to use lead for this step, or where in the world they manufacture the cups, but my other concern is that even though the general public will likely not be exposed if it's covered, there are still workers who have to handle it during production.
anyway, i just find that i am constantly learning about more places that lead gets found and it's just. sigh. i know lead has many appealing properties which is why it is constantly found everywhere in everything but at this point it's incredibly clear that no benefits outweigh its risks....
67 notes
·
View notes
Czech scientist discovered the working mechanism of a miraculous antibiotics that can kill even the gold staphylococcus
This is the title of an interview that I did about my antibiotic research for a Czech magazine HROT. Full interview article here.
I was really happy about this. I want people to know what we researchers are doing. But what I did not expect was email along these lines:
Dear Dr. Melcrová, I read your article in the magazine. I am suffering from staphylococcal infections for many years. Could you help me?
...I was in quite a shock. How should I reply? I am not a medical doctor. And my research is not yet approved for clinical practise. It's tough.
6 notes
·
View notes
flickr
Educational Services Staff with a Spacemobile Vehicle by NASA on The Commons
Via Flickr:
Members of NASA's Lewis Research Center’s (now NASA Glenn) Educational Services Office pose with one of the center’s Spacemobile space science demonstration units. Unlike its predecessor, the NACA, the new NASA space agency considered public outreach one of its core tenets. The early astronauts were lionized and new technologies touted. Lewis, which had previously been a closed laboratory, began hosting open houses and elaborate space fairs in the early 1960s. In addition, the center initiated educational programs that worked with local schools and a robust speaker’s bureau that explained NASA activities to the community. One aspect of these efforts was the Spacemobile Program. These vehicles included a delegated speaker, exhibits, models, and other resources. The Spacemobiles, which made forays across the Midwest, were extremely active throughout the 1960s. NASA Media Usage Guidelines Credit: NASA Image Number: GRC-1964-C-72829 Date: November 1, 1964
0 notes
“The dance between autonomy and affinity creates morality”
New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/the-dance-between-autonomy-and-affinity-creates-morality/
“The dance between autonomy and affinity creates morality”
MIT philosophy doctoral student Abe Mathew believes individual rights play an important role in protecting the autonomy we value. But he also thinks we risk serious dysfunction if we ignore the importance of supporting and helping others.
“We should also acknowledge another feature of our moral lives,” he says, “namely, our need for affinity or closeness with other human beings, and our continued reliance on them to live flourishing lives in the world.”
Philosophy can be an important tool in understanding how humans interact with one another, he says. “I study moral obligation and rights, how the two relate, and the role they have to play in how we relate to one another,” Mathew adds.
Mathew asks that we think of autonomy and affinity as opposing forces — an idea he attributes to MIT philosopher, professor, and mentor Kieran Setiya. Autonomy pushes people farther from us, and affinity pulls people closer, Mathew says.
“The dance between autonomy and affinity creates morality,” Mathew adds.
Mathew is investigating one of moral philosophy’s foundational ideas — that every obligation we owe to another person correlates to a right that they have against us. The “Correlativity Thesis” is widely taken for granted, he says.
“A common example that’s used to motivate the Correlativity Thesis is a case of a promise,” Mathew explains. “If I promise to meet you for coffee at 11, then I have a moral obligation to meet you for coffee at 11, and you have a right to meet me at 11.” While Mathew believes this is how promising works, he doesn’t think the Correlativity Thesis is true across the board.
“There isn’t necessarily a one-to-one relationship between rights and obligations,” he says.
“We need folks’ help to do things”
Before coming to MIT, Mathew majored in philosophy and minored in ethics, law, and society as an undergraduate at the University of Toronto. Upon graduating in 2020, he was awarded the prestigious John Black Aird Scholarship, given each year to the university’s top undergraduate.
Now at MIT, Mathew says his research is based on the value of shared responsibility.
“We need folks’ help to do things,” he says.
When we lose sight of moral values, our societal connections can fall away, he argues.
“Mutual cooperation makes our lives possible,” Mathew says.
His research suggests alternatives to the idea that rights demand obligations.
“Morality puts a certain kind of pressure on us to ‘pay it forward’ — it requires us to do for others what was once done for us,” Mathew says. “If we don’t, we’re making an exception of ourselves; in essence, we’re saying, ‘I was worthy of that help from others, but no one else is worthy of being helped by me.’”
Mathew also values the notion of paying it forward because he’s seen its value in his life. “I’ve encountered so many people who’ve gone above and beyond that I owe them,” he says.
A valuable social compact
Mathew has been extensively involved in “public philosophy.” For example, he’s organized public events at MIT, like the successful “Ask a Philosopher Anything” panel in the Stata Center lobby.
Mathew’s work leading the local chapter of Corrupt the Youth, a philosophy outreach program focused on bringing philosophy to high schools students from historically marginalized groups, is an extension of his belief in our shared responsibility for one another — of “paying it forward.”
“The reason I discovered philosophy was because of my instructors in college who not only introduced me to the subject, but also cultivated my enthusiasm for it and mentored me,” he says. “Our moral theorizing should take into account the kinds of creatures we are: vulnerable human beings who are constantly in need of each other to get by in the world.”
Morality, Mathew says, gives us a tool — the social practice of forgiving — through which we can coexist, repair relationships we damage, and lead our lives together.
Mathew wants moral philosophers to consider their ideas’ practical, real-world applications. His experiences derive, in part, from notions of moral responsibility. Those who’ve been given a lot, he believes, have a greater responsibility for others. These kinds of social systems can consistently be improved by paying good deeds forward, he says.
“Moral philosophy should help build a world that allows for our mutual benefit,” Mathew says.
0 notes