#rūm
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
history of Byzantium re-listen has gotten to Nikephoros I, let’s fucking go
70 notes
·
View notes
Text
Reblogging because A: I agree and B: the Notes are Informative!
see one of my problems w movies n tv shows is that they often show a character of like a scientist or a historian and try and make them extremely boring but that shit just doesnt work on me. theyll b like 'well in 13th century turkey...' n everyone will b like ughhh shut up professor dinglebarry no one cares and like. well excuse me. stop the movie. id like to hear more about 13th century turkey.
22K notes
·
View notes
Text
Be patient! Indeed, the Promise of Allāh is true and let not those who are devoid of certainty discourage you from conveying (the message).
[Al-Rūm, 30:60]
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
Shoroon Bumbagar, tomb of a Turkic (Gokturk) nobleman, 650-700 CE
"Like Chinese historians, Muslim writers in general depict the ‘Turks’ as possessing East Asian physiognomy. For instance, Sharaf al-Zamān Tāhir Marvazī describes them as being ‘short, with small eyes, nostrils, and mouths’ (1942: 53–4, 156). Similarly, Tabarī (d. 923) depicts the ‘Turks’ as being ‘full-faced with small eyes’ (1987: 21). In his Qābūs-nāma, the eleventh-century Ziyarid ruler Kai Kā'ūs also describes the ‘Turks’ as possessing ‘a large head (sar-i buzurg), a broad face (rūy-i pahn), narrow eyes (chashmhā-i tang), and a flat nose (bīnī-i pakhch), and unpleasing lips and teeth (lab va dandān na nīkū)’ (Kai Kā'ūs ibn Iskandar 1951a: 103; 1951b: 64). The Arab historian and geographer al-Mas'ūdī (896–956) writes that the Oghuz Turks residing in Yengi-kent, a town near the mouth of the Syr Darya, ‘are distinguished from other Turks by their valour, their slanted eyes, and the smallness of their stature’ (wa hum ashadd al-Turk ba’san wa aqsaruhum wa asgharuhum a‘yunan wa fī al-Turk man huwa aqsar min hā’ulā’) (al-Mas'ūdī 1962–: Vol. 1, 212). However, Muslim writers later differentiated the Oghuz Turks from other Turks in terms of physiognomy. Rashīd al-Dīn writes that ‘because of the climate their features gradually changed into those of Tajiks. Since they were not Tajiks, the Tajik peoples called them turkmān, i.e. Turk-like (Turk-mānand)’ (Rashīd al-Dīn Fażlallāh Hamadānī 1988: Vol. 1, 35–6; Rashiduddin Fazlullah 1998–99: Vol. 1, 31). Hāfiz Tanīsh Mīr Muhammad Bukhārī (d. c. 1549) also relates that after the Oghuz came to Transoxiana and Iran, their ‘Turkic face did not re-main as it was’ (1983: fol. 17a (text), Vol. 1, 61 (trans.)). Abū al-Ghāzī Bahadur Khan similarly writes that ‘their chin started to become narrow, their eyes started to become large, their faces started to become small, and their noses started to become big’ after five or six generations (Abu-l-Gazi 1958: 42 (text), 57 (trans.); Ebülgazî Bahadir Han 1975: 57–8). As a matter of fact, the mixed nature of the Ottomans, belonging to the Oghuz Turkic group, is noted by the Ottoman historian Mustafā Ālī (1541–1600). In his Künhü'l-ahbār, he remarks that the Ottoman elites of the sixteenth century were of mostly of non-Turkic origin: ‘Most of the inhabitants of Rum are of confused ethnic origin. Among its notables there are few whose lineage does not go back to a convert to Islam …’ (Ekser-i sükkān-i vilāyet-i Rūm meclis-i muhtelit ul-mefhūm olub ā‘yānında az kimsene bulunur ki nesebi bir müslüm-i cedīde muntehī olmaya) (Fleischer 1986: 254; Mustafā Ālī, Künhü'l-ahbār 1860–68: Vol. 1, 16)."
-Joo-Yup Lee & Shuntu Kuang, A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Historical Sources and Y-DNA Studies with Regard to the Early and Medieval Turkic Peoples
83 notes
·
View notes
Text
May Allāh reward them and increase their love for each other 🥹❤️ "And one of His signs is that He created for you spouses from among yourselves so that you may find comfort in them. And He has placed between you compassion and mercy. Surely in this are signs for people who reflect." [Sūrah ar-Rūm, Verse 21]
90 notes
·
View notes
Text
Samonas
i want that twink dealt with but not necessarily destroyed as i may have use for his conniving eunuch ways later
15K notes
·
View notes
Text
Brahma and its Ancient Origins
By Hossein Behzad - http://sadmu.ir/detail/5613, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=85573572
Jalāl al-Dīn Muḥammad Rūmī, also known as Muhammad bin Muhammad bin al-Husayn al-Khatibi al Bakhi al-Bakri, more commonly known in English as Rumi, was a Persian Islamic scholar, Sufi mystic, and poet who lived from 1207-1273. His name indicates that he was from the Sultinate of Rūm in Anatolia, which was part of the Byzantine Empire near the time of his birth. Rumi comes from a Persian word meaning 'Roman', meaning the Eastern Roman, or Byzantine Empire. His father was a preacher and jurist in Balkh, which was a major center of Persian and Sufi culture. When Rumi was five, the family moved to Samarkand due to the Mongols invasion, but Balkh had a deep effect on him through his life. He held a deep respect for Persian poets that went before him, such as Attar and Sanal, saying 'Attar was the spirit, Sanal his eyes twain, And in time thereafter, Came we in their train'. The family then settled in Karaman in Central Anatolia. There, his mother and brother died and his father remarried two more times. When Rumi was 21, the family settled in Konya at the invitation of 'Alā' ud-Dīn Key-Qobād who ruled Anatolia at the time so that his father could become the head of a religious school called a madrassa. When Rumi was 25, his father died and he inherited the position while continuing to learn under others. He traveled to Damascus and met with a dervish Shams-e Tabrizi, who had a deep influence on him. He tended to spontaneously compose poems that were collected by his followers and others. After the death of Shams, when Rumi was 40, he found another companion, Salaḥ ud-Din-e Zarkub, then Hussam-e Chalabi. Hussam encouraged Rumi to write his poetry down, that it 'would become the companion of many troubadours.' Over the next twelve years of his life, he dictated six volumes to Hussam. Many of Rumi's works talk about the love that infuses the world, which is a common thread with other mystic and Sufi poets. While he wrote about other religions, he held Islam above the others and the Quran as the ultimate truth.
By Photograph: World ImagingImage: Charles Masson (1841) - This file has been extracted from another file, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=85583318
Brahma is the Hindu creator in the supreme divinity that includes Vishnu and Shiva. The earliest mentions of Brahma probably date to the late first millenium BCE in the Maitrayaniya Upanishad. In it, 'one's Soul is Brahman, and this is the Ultimate Reality, Cosmic Universal or God is within each living being.' Brahma is often depicted with four faces that face the four directions and four arms without weapons in his hands, but rather holding symbols of knowledge and creation such as a copy of the Vedas and a mala, a loop of prayer beads, which symbolizes time.
In the poem, Rumi places the reader in the place of many parts of the world, beginning with 'I am the mote in the sunbeam, and I am the burning sun;/"rest here!" I whisper to the atom; I call to the orb, "Roll on!"' Not everything is pleasant, though, as he ads '[t]he warrior, the blade that smites him, his mother's heart-wrung tear;/I am intoxication, grapes, wine-press, and must, and wine' as well as 'I am both Good and Evil; the deed and the deed's intent,/Temptation, victim, sinner, crime, pardon and punishment'. It culminates with 'I am what was, is, will be; creation's ascent and fall;/The link, the chain of existence; beginning and end of all.'
You can read the whole poem here.
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
Justinian/Mehmed II
overrated: Justinian
not around here or among scholars, but in general he’s the poster emperor whose map gets called “Byzantium” in textbooks despite being totally inaccurate to the following ~800 years of the empire. he inherited a full treasury from other emperors and spent it on wars that were, even without the benefit of hindsight, hugely ambitious and unlikely to succeed in the long term. the Codex Justinianus was a great idea, but it was in the wrong language, and within a century it couldn’t really be used in practical settings. he persecuted religious minorities, adulterers, gay people, etc, and morality aside, that seems like still more unnecessary conflict-stirring for behaviors a government cannot possibly eradicate. essentially, all the cool shit that created his popular reputation represents an overextension of imperial resources and goodwill that his descendants would spend decades mopping up.
I do not consider “handing out sacks of gold so engineers can build a huge temple” an achievement in its own right, no matter how cool the building is.
underrated: Mehmed II
I cannot believe I’m saying that about Fatih Sultan Mehmed, whose name graces half the stuff in Turkey, but I think he gets credit for the wrong things. knocking over Constantinople was a serious achievement, but it would have happened sooner or later. after Manuel II’s failed panhandling tour of Western Europe in 1400, it was pretty clear they were headed for the grave.
his administration was good, though! most Ottoman conquests happened after prolonged periods of raiding and vassalage, but he was able to take Constantinople from being a hostile foreign power to his own capital almost overnight. the church could have been a huge source of future rebellions, but he incorporated the patriarchate deftly, mostly by letting him have free rein as long as he respected the new ruler. he expanded the devşirme into the bureaucracy, which was a welcome sliver of meritocracy, and centralized the government, making further conquest easier to administer. and after all this, he built the city back from its pre-conquest shell.
I think he was very successful at building systems of government that were flexible and resilient, and did the opposite of Justinian’s micromanagement of his populace. kudos to him for picking winnable battles.
50 notes
·
View notes
Text
Medieval Persian folklore includes mention of two outstanding conquerors who invaded Iran from opposite directions: Eskandar of Rum, and Afrāsīāb of Turan. Eskandar is known to be Alexander the Great ("Rūm" = "Rome" i.e. Greece). But who on earth is this Afrāsīāb person? "Turān" is the old Persian name for the Central Asian steppe. But we know nothing of the Achaemenids' dealings with the people on their eastern borders; almost all of our knowledge comes from Greek writers who focused on the western portion of the empire. Some think that Afrāsīāb is a fictional character (like another villain of the Shahnameh: the demon-king Zahhāk, who derives from the mythical dragon Aži Dahāka). But I think it's also possible that he was a real person—perhaps some Scythian warlord—who fought against Persia and was remembered for it in Persian mytho-history. A good comparison here is with Attila the Hun, another would-be conqueror from the steppe. Like Afrāsīāb, Attila was remembered and commemorated in the folk traditions of the local people—in this case, Germanic poems like Widsith, the Nibelungenlied, and the Poetic Edda. The difference is that in Attila's case, we also have contemporary, reliable historical accounts which historians can use to corroborate (or not) the references to Attila in poetry: no need to uselessly speculate on who this mysterious "Atli" figure was or whether he existed. No such corroborating witness exists for Afrāsīāb. So we can't even know if he was real or mythical.
A modern Persian wanting to learn about the earliest history of his or her civilization is much better served by reading Herodotus than Ferdowsi. Likewise, a modern Greek is going to get much better information about earliest Greece from the records of the Egyptians and Hittites than from the poetry of Homer. Adopting a discerning eye towards different sources of historical evidence often means that the most accurate and reliable history of a culture doesn't come from that culture at all, but from outsiders—this is a point which modern commentators of Native American history often don't want to accept. Who knows the most about the early Alaskan Tlingit? People who can read Russian, that's who. The flipside, however, is that when documentation for a period is sparse, people can start to confuse lack of evidence for lack of incidence: "we don't know a lot about the eastern Persian Empire, so not a lot must have happened." But that's not going to be the perspective of someone from ancient Persia—certainly not if they're from one of the eastern satrapies after their village has been sacked. To assume that everything of significance that happened in Persia happened with Greece is to make the same mistake as that critic ("What is this to me, the duel between Iran and Turan?"). Modern histories of Persia ignore Afrāsīāb; they can only go where the evidence takes them. But the Shahnameh apparently puts Afrāsīāb on roughly the same level as Eskandar—that fact might (might!) be a clue that something big did happen out on the eastern Persian frontier, which could be compared to Alexander's invasion. Maybe. The record is silent.
Trying to reconstruct the history of the frontier-beyond-the-frontier is a tricky business. Sometimes you get lucky, like with the Kiowas (on whom more in a future post): where written history, oral history, archaeology, linguistics, and winter counts all come together to form a coherent picture of the Kiowa past which reaches back a thousand years. And sometimes you get unlucky, like with the Arapahoes, who are invisible to the archaeological record and whose early history is a giant mystery. And then there are enigmas, like the Suhtai, on whom all a person can really do is guess. All of this is of course highly relevant to any attempt at making a map of peoples who lived beyond the reach of recorded history. Crumbs... And as for the Bloody Falls Massacre: the Wikipedia article tells me that "in 1996, Dene and Inuit representatives participated in a healing ceremony to reconcile the centuries-old grievance." I can't really argue with that, I suppose. Healing is good, reconciliation is good. But it is hard to hold a healing ceremony for a massacre that nobody remembers. Did you take notice of the fact that it has a name: "the Bloody Falls Massacre"? Why? Who named it that? Do you suppose it would it have a name, or be remembered at all, among the Chipewyans, still to this day, after 248 years, if no one had been there to write it down? Perhaps... but I'm inclined to think likely not. It was just one raid, after all. One among thousands of sanguinary struggles that took place on the lonely tundras, of which the world knows not.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Bilād al-Maghrib, Dhul-Hijjah 1444, Atlantic coast
True Dreams in the Qur'an
وأما الآية التي أوردها فهي قوله -تبارك وتعالى-: وَمِنْ آيَاتِهِ مَنَامُكُمْ بِاللَّيْلِ وَالنَّهَارِ [الروم:23]، ووجه تعلق هذه الآية بموضوع الرؤيا هو: أن النوم آية من آيات الله -تبارك وتعالى-، وذلك أن الإدراك والشعور يرتفع فيه، مع أن الروح لا تفارق البدن مفارقة تامة، كما هو في الموت، وإنما يبقى لها تعلق بالجسد، لكنه يرتفع معه الإدراك، فهذه الروح لها أحوال، وتنقلات، وتحولات، وأمور غيبية لا ندركها، فتنتقل في الملأ الأعلى، وترى أمورًا في نومها، قد تكون من الله.
As for the verse he mentioned, it is His saying - عز و جل - the Blessed and Exalted -:
} And among His signs is your sleep during the night and the day [Ar-Rūm: 23], {
and the way this verse relates to the subject of dreams is: that sleep is a sign of Allāh - the Blessed and Exalted -, and that is the perception of feeling risen, although the soul does not leave the body completely, as it happens with death, but it remains attached to the body, but perception rises with it, for this soul has conditions, transitions, transformations, and unseen matters that we do not grasp or understand.
So it moves in the highest assembly (Heaven, the world of Angels), and sees things in its sleep, which are from Allāh.
#tafseer#ahlulhadith#ahlulsunnah#quran&sunnah#islamicreminder#islampost#sunnah#salaf#manhaj salaf#deenislam#understanding your deen#deenoverdunya
12 notes
·
View notes
Text
Shaykh Salih al Fawzan حفظه الله said :
“Whenever the youth gets married, his soul is relieved from agitation, anxiety and he has peace of mind. Allāh says in the Qur'ān (about wives)
لِتَسْكُنُوا إِلَيْهَا “
That you may find repose (tranquility) in them.” [Surah Ar-Rūm: 21]
11 notes
·
View notes
Photo
I’m pretty sure this is the most I’ve learned about the Hittites and That’s Sad.
Hi, my name is sisterofiris and I’m here to provide you with extremely niche Hittite memes
7K notes
·
View notes
Text
⚠️ 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐲𝐤𝐡 𝐒𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐦𝐚̄𝐧 𝐚𝐥-‘𝐀𝐥𝐰𝐚̄𝐧 (فك الله أسره) 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐅𝐚𝐭𝐰𝐚 𝐨𝐧 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐍𝐨𝐧-𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝐋𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 ⚠️
𝗦𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝗮𝗶𝗱: “Some declared him (shaykh al-‘Alwān) a disbeliever because he permitted shirk (of voting).”
𝗦𝗵𝗮𝘆𝗸𝗵 𝗔𝗯𝘂̄ ‘𝗔𝗯𝗱𝘂𝗹𝗹𝗮̄𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗱: “You are mistaken! He never permitted shirk. Rather, he is one of the leading scholars of our, calling towards pure tawhīd. In fact, he was imprisoned for this very reason. May Allāh free him with honor and grant him strength.
The matter was centered around which form of kufr would cause less harm and danger to the Muslims between the two.
Shaykh al-‘Alwān made his ijtehād based on the following Words of Allāh (ﷻ):
«Alif-Lãm-Mĩm. The Romans have been defeated, in a nearby land. Yet following their defeat, they will triumph, within three to nine years. The ˹whole˺ matter rests with Allah before and after ˹victory˺. And on that day the believers will rejoice at the victory willed by Allah. He gives victory to whoever He wills. For He is the Almighty, Most Merciful». [Surah ar-Rūm: 1-5]
And the incident of the migration to the Negus (King of Abyssinia) before his acceptance of Islām when Makkah was a land of disbelief. Other similar incidents such as seeking protection from one disbeliever against another, and allying with one disbeliever against another.
There is a vast difference between a country founded on kufr, where disbelievers dominate, and a country where the majority are Muslims and Islāmic practices are openly prevalent.
Kufr and Shirk occur when Muslims are forced to choose between Islām and any form of kufr—whether secularism, democracy, other ideologies based on kufr, shirk, and ignorance.
As for me personally, I do not hold this view. Rather, I say that it is obligatory to completely dissociate oneself from any choice involving legislation by anyone other than Allāh.
A Muslim must not choose any degree of kufr to be ruled by the laws of Taghūt or the accursed Satan.
And Allāh knows best."
📌 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗯𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘆𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁: "𝗮 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝗸𝗻𝗼𝘄𝗹𝗲𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝘆𝗸𝗵 (𝗮𝗹-‘𝗔𝗹𝘄𝗮̄𝗻) 𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗵𝗶𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝘆𝗸𝗵 𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗻 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗷𝗮𝗶𝗹.’ 𝗠𝗮𝘆 𝗔𝗹𝗹𝗮̄𝗵 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗺.”
_________________________________
𝖲𝗁𝖺𝗒𝗄𝗁 𝖠𝖻𝗎̄ '𝖠𝖻𝖽𝗎𝗅𝗅𝖺̄𝗁 𝖲𝖺̄𝖽𝗂𝗊 𝖻𝗂𝗇 '𝖠𝖻𝖽𝗎𝗅𝗅𝖺̄𝗁 𝖺𝗅-𝖧ā𝗌𝗁𝗂𝗆𝗂̄ (حفظه الله ورعاه) — 𝗌𝗍𝗎𝖽𝖾𝗇𝗍 𝗈𝖿 𝖲𝗁𝖺𝗒𝗄𝗁 𝖺𝗅-𝖬𝗎𝗁̣𝖺𝖽𝖽𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝖲𝗎𝗅𝖺𝗒𝗆𝖺̄𝗇 𝖻𝗂𝗇 𝖭𝖺̄𝗌̣𝗂𝗋 𝖺𝗅-'𝖠𝗅𝗐𝖺̄𝗇 (فرج الله عنه و ثبته)
0 notes
Text
"From Three to Nine." Introduction to Surah 30, Ar Rum, "Stripped!"
Surah 30, also known as Ar-Rum, was revealed in 615 AD. The surah's name comes from the second verse, which mentions the words "ghulibat-ir-Rum". The historical event that took place in 615 A.D. is the basis for determining the exact year of the surah's revelation:
The Romans were defeated by the Iranians in the territories of Jordan, Syria, and Palestine.
The Prophet permitted oppressed Muslims to migrate to Habsha.
The surah's opening verses predict that the Romans would be victorious again within a few years. Some consider this prediction to be a strong example of the Quran being the word of Allah and the Prophet Muhammad being a true Messenger of Allah.
Surah Ar-Rum is an example of a "Meccan surah," which means it was revealed in Mecca before the Prophet's migration to Medina.
While Rum is Arabic for "the Romans", Hebrew for pomegranate which means "high, but not haughty." Ar Rum in Hebrew means "naked, stipped."
The word Rūm comes from the Greek word Ῥωμαῖοι (Rhomaioi), which means "Romans". It was used to refer to the pre-Islamic inhabitants of the Balkans, the Middle East, and Anatolia, when those regions were part of the Eastern Roman Empire. During the time of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, Rūm was used to refer to the Eastern Roman Empire. It is sometimes translated as "The Byzantines" or "The Greeks".
The word Rūm is also used in Turkish and Persian. In Turkish, it remains a synonym for the medieval Eastern Roman Empire and its people.
...
I still do not have news of the American government's proper decision to put Donald Trump in prison and close his party, the Republicans for their role in the siege of January 6, the terrorist attacks in Israel on October 7, or its unapologetic use of state power to traffic in sex with minors. The DOJ and now the international community have all the data, but there is not one hint justice will be served. This is unholy, a violation of all that has happened since humanity stood on its feet long and long ago.
The Russian army continues to prowl and the Turks are now out of water. There are supersonic missiles flying, the seas are rising, billions are choking, starving, and writhing. It is just another day. But God made the Muslims numerous so they could speak the loudest and the most articulately for the God of Heaven and you must be heard. I insist.
Thus begins the Surah.
30: 1-10:
Alif-Lãm-Mĩm. "Pray, teach the people about the Spirit of the Water."
The Romans have been defeated
in a nearby land.1 Yet following their defeat, they will triumph
within three to nine years.1 The ˹whole˺ matter rests with Allah before and after ˹victory˺. And on that day the believers will rejoice
at the victory willed by Allah. He gives victory to whoever He wills. For He is the Almighty, Most Merciful.
˹This is˺ the promise of Allah. ˹And˺ Allah never fails in His promise. But most people do not know.
They ˹only˺ know the worldly affairs of this life, but are ˹totally˺ oblivious to the Hereafter.
Have they not reflected upon their own being? Allah only created the heavens and the earth and everything in between for a purpose and an appointed term. Yet most people are truly in denial of the meeting with their Lord!
Have they not travelled throughout the land to see what was the end of those ˹destroyed˺ before them? They were far superior in might; they cultivated the land and developed it more than these ˹Meccans˺ ever have. Their messengers came to them with clear proofs. Allah would have never wronged them, but it was they who wronged themselves.
Then most evil was the end of the evildoers for denying and mocking the signs of Allah.
Commentary:
The Prophet states from defeat the Romans will rise and be again victorious, but not in the ways God dictates. But Muhammad said the tide will turn in nine years. Nine years are Angelic Code for the amount of time it takes for mankind to learn its lessons.
Now I have ended Christianity and the Mormon faith, they had no scripture and were not serving God or man. Their pilgrims a destructive breed of incestuous perverts and lawless freaks may find their way to heaven if the Spirit will allow and their determinations are correct. But for Jews, Muslims and the rest, God has given us three to nine years.
"Within three to nine years.1 The ˹whole˺ matter rests with Allah before and after ˹victory˺. And on that day the believers will rejoice at the victory willed by Allah. He gives victory to whoever He wills. For He is the Almighty, Most Merciful."
The Value in Gematria is: 18077, יחי עז, "Long Live the Lord."
The mission and Spirit of the God of Islam is the objective search for what is good, moral, ethical, and truth no matter how thorougly deceived the world has become.
The world's leaders are sending too many men off to die, too few to live. To reverse these circumstances and resume the path, we must find the real purpose of life.
Thus we name the Surah "stripped" because that is what we are going to do until man obeys the Law and the laws and publishes the peace and holds fast to its standards. Man must be able to benefit from his time in this world. This is what is called Allah, this is the measurement.
Every good Muslim knows heaven and the earth are the same. Until both places equalize each other in fact as well as definition, Allah is not present. And so long as there is war in the Middle East, the US Government knows it can do whatever the hell it wants, and this exposes the Mosque to heresy. The Mosque = 445, tameh, "the Day of Judgement" about which man is "puzzled." Also, "taste the intonation of God."
In Parsi, it is Hemat, "the certainty of sooth." Now read the Quran backwards and forwards and follow it back to the Mosque where the Messengers left their marks, and all will work out.
The Surah will continue.
0 notes
Video
youtube
30. Surah Ar-Rūm
0 notes
Text
if you go to Pergamum you HAVE to tell me if you met a mini-pinscher type stray dog (small, black, and very athletic) with red ticking on her legs. she was my tour guide and I want to know how she’s doing out there
Pergamum was located in the northwest of Asia Minor (present day Turkey) was a cosmopolitan city, cultural meeting of the Roman Empire. In 2014, Unesco chose Pergamum as a World Heritage Site.
600 notes
·
View notes