abdullahblogsposts

[abdullahblogsposts]

By ash-Shāykh al-‘Allāmah ‘Abdul-‘Azīz at-Tuwăyli’ī Rāhîmâhûllāh

All praise belongs to Allāh, and Salāh and Salām be upon the Messenger of Allāh, to proceed:

Indeed, from the matters where differences and mistakes have increased is the issue of ��al-‘udhr bil-jahl” (i.e. excuse of ignorance) in Asl ad-Dīn (the foundation of the Dīn), and many of those who view that the jāhil who commits major shirk is excused, make the basis and reason for that his affiliation to Islām and his claim that he’s from the Muslîmįn. So if he worshiped other than Allāh, and made du’ā to it and sacrificed to it, and was raised upon that since his birth till his death, and he would profess with his tongue “I am a Muslim”, he would consider him from the Muslîmįn, and if he worshiped other than Allāh, and made du’ā to it, and sacrificed to it, and would profess with his tongue, “I’m upon the way that Allāh has commanded me to be upon”, he would not excuse him, and this is from the contradictions, without a doubt. And if he is cited with the comparison between the grave-worshipers and the idol worshipers, and not excusing either one of them with ignorance, he made the affiliation to Islām the difference (between the two), and due to this affiliation (to Islām), he rules upon the idol worshiper with kufr, and rules upon the grave worshiper with Islām.

And affiliation to Islām, if it meant solely ascribing to Islām without the rest of the obligations (like Salāh etc), then it is a ruling without any proof for it, and if it means ascribing to the Dīn of Allāh, the Exalted and Majestic, whether that affiliation was to the Islām which Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) was sent with, or to judaism or christianity or other laws which the Messengers were sent with, The one who says this statement must rule the ignorant ones among the jews and christians and other than them with Islām, because they attribute themselves to the Dīn of Allāh which He ordered them to follow, and they fell into nullifiers due to ignorance, and whoever excuse those has disbelieved and left fold of Islām, and denied the authentic and explicit (texts) from the evidences.

In fact, he must rule upon the mushrikīn of Quraysh with Islām before the advent of the Messenger of Allāh (صلى الله عليه وسلم), because they say they are upon the Millāh of Ibrāhīm (عليه السلام) according to what they claim and assume, and they had some obliations taken from him, and Ahkām (i.e. rulings) such as Hajj, circumcision, exalting the rites, and they acknowledge that Allāh is the Lord with no partners with Him in creating, sustenance, bringing to life, causing to die, however they commit shirk with others besides Allāh, so it can bring them closer to Allāh, believing that Allāh has permitted him to be a mandate on His behalf, and an intermediary between Him and His creation, Allāh is Exalted from what they claim. And the grave worshipers are exactly like them in all of this, except that the grave worshipers attribute themselves to the seal of the Prophets instead of the jāhiliyyīn who attribute themselves to Ibrāhīm (عليه السلام). Moreover, they and them are the same in everything and the grave worshipers will have no benefit in following the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) or adhering to some of his obligations in the Dīn, just like the kuffār of Qurāysh had no benefit in following Ibrāhīm (عليه السلام) or adhering to some of his obligations in the Dīn.

So affiliation to Islām is in contrast with affiliation to the way of Ibrāhīm, and some of the obligations which they abide by in worship is in contrast with those (the mushrikīn perform), and the more, or less, (one performs of these) doesn’t make a difference in affirming Imān and kufr, and acknowledging the Rubūbiyyah of Allāh is in contrast with those (mushrikīn) who affirm the Rubūbiyyah, and both parties are disbelievers in Allāh, outside the fold of Islām, emitted from the Dīn. And if he was affiliated to the correct Dīn (i.e. upon pure Tawhīd) and committed apostasy when he first grew up, as is the case with many of the qubūriyyah and amongst the jāhiliyyīn. And after that has surpassed of being upon the fitrah of Islām (they became apostates afterwards) as is the case with some of the qubūriyyīn and the early ones who fell into apostasy from the jāhiliyyīn.

In fact, the grave-worshipers even claim that what they are doing is what Allāh and His Messenger has ordered, in contrast with the statement of the mushrikīn in jāhiliyyah, as Allāh, the Exalted and Majestic spoke about them, “And when they commit an immorality, they say, “We found our fathers doing it, and Allāh has ordered us to do it.” [7:28]

And this is the proof of the over-whelming majority of the mushrikīn amongst the grave worshipers today, rather I met with one of the major leaders from the people of shirk performing ‘Umrah, and he uses the same proof of the first kuffār, and he said, “It’s not allowed for you to rebuke what the people (i.e. grave worshippers) are practicing, because they took it from their fathers, and there’s no doubt that they (also) took it from their fathers, and the khalâf took it from the Salâf, so then it (is taken) from the Messenger of Allāh (صلى الله عليه وسلم)!”

This is exactly what is mentioned in the Āyah from the ‘proofs’ of the mushrikīn in two things: That they found their fore-fathers practicing it, and that Allāh has ordered them to do it. Al-Hāfidh Ibn Kathīr (رحمه الله) said, “And they believe that the practice of their fore-fathers is traced back to a command from Allāh and the Sharī’ah.” And even though this is in the context of “al-Fāhisha”, which was interpreted as being their tawāf around the Kā’bah naked, except that it’s indicative to the practice of their fore-fathers as an evidence (for them), and it’s their assumption that the practice of their fore-fathers is stemmed back to a Legislation from Allāh. And this wrong mistake, just as it occurs with some of the opponents in the issue of “excuse of ignorance” from the students of knowledge, for verily it occurs amongst the laymen alot in excusing the stubborn person (who refuses to accept the Hujjāh) that ascribes himself to Islām, so they don’t make Takfīr upon the one who ascribes himself to Islām at all, rather I heard from some of those who were called “Du’āt as-Sahwa” (i.e. revivalist preachers), who flipped and turned so much say, , “I do not make Takfīr upon whoever says I’m Muslim,” when he was asked about the likes of Hāfidh al-Assad (i.e. Bashār’s father, may Allāh curse his soul) and the Arab tawāghīt amongst the apostate rulers. And this is the exact blind misconception, and only if I knew, if this was the path of guidance and truth, then why did as-Siddīq (i.e. Abū Bakr) bother with fighting Musaylamah (the liar) and those with him, to the extent that the best Sahābah went out and died, and killings intensified among the Reciters, Scholars and people of the Qur’ān?! And the majority of those who the Scholars have ruled upon with kufr were among the murtaddīn, even though the over-whelming majority of them attributed themselves to Islām, and refused to be labelled with other than that.

Rather (to the extent that) this statement has ousted: That the one who says “I’m upon the religion of Mūsa” doesn’t disbelieve, or “I’m upon the religion of ‘Īsa” among the jews and christians, and this statement is extravagantly pored in the furthest of misguidance from the Dīn of Allāh, and the Book of Allāh, and the Sunnah of His Messenger (صلى الله عليه وسلم). And if it is said, “This is not acceptable, for they disbelieved after the advent of Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and the abrogation of their ways,” so this necessitates that if they attributed themselves to Islām after the advent of Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and remained upon what they are upon, their ignorant ones would be excused and be a Muslim, and it also necessitates that their ignorant ones were all Muslim believers during the advent of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم), and they only disbelieved due to his advent, and this is obviously invalid and false.

What we just mentioned doesn’t mean that we say there’s no difference at all between the one who ascribes himself to Islām and the one who doesn’t ascribe to it among the mushrikīn. Rather, the affiliation of a person to Islām after he has disbelieved has Islām affirmed upon him in what is the “Dhāhir” (i.e. what’s apparent), so if he didn’t adhere to its rulings, or he committed acts of kufr that nullify the Asl (i.e. Foundation) of Tawhīd, then he is judged with apostasy. But as for the disbelieving groups that are raised upon this view (of shirk), then affirming Islām for them due to their affiliation to Islām has two statements among the Scholars. Some of them view that Islām is affirmed for them due to the affiliation, and apostasy is affirmed (right after) from what they commit from the acts of kufr, and others view that they are originally disbelievers (i.e. kuffār asliyyīn), and that their affiliation to Islām is just like the affiliation of the mushrîkįn of Qurāysh to the Millâh of Ibrāhīm, and this is what’s correct for what has surpassed of not differentiating between both affiliations, and Allāh knows best. (I)

This, and peace and blessings be upon His slave and Messenger Muhammad, and upon all of his household and companions.

I. It is only relatively recently that the Scholars have formed two opinions with regards to those who ascribe to Islām and have shirk with them. An Įjmā’ was stated by ash-Shaykh ‘Abdul-Latīf from the ‘Ulamā of the Dā’wāh Najdįyyāh Salafįyyāh Jihādiyyah that they are ruled upon with riddah. This is what the Khilāfah holds onto as well. But, that does not suggest that they were ever Muslim for a day, as it is based on the principle that whoever says the Shahādah enters into Islām and whoever commits shirk leaves it. Allāh tabāraka wa ta’ālā knows best.

[abdullahblogsposts]

They(Scholars of Tawāghįt) should review their religion before their graves dug and before they pass away!!

They must repent and turn back to Allāh Az-Zâwâ Jâl

#Murjį'āhRejects!!

[abdullahblogsposts]

Įbn Tāhîr said: I heard [Abū Įsmā'īl Al-Harāwį] say: "I was threatened with the sword five times, not being told to abandon my beliefs, but rather to remain silent about those who opposed with me. I would respond, 'I will not remain silent.'"

"Sįyâr Ā'lâm al-Nubâlā" 18/509

‏قال ابن طاهر : سمعته [أبا إسماعيل الهروي] يقول : عرضت على السيف خمس مرات ، لا يقال لي : ارجع عن مذهبك . لكن يقال لي : اسكت عمن خالفك . فأقول : لا أسكت

سير أعلام النبلاء 18/509

[abdullahblogsposts]

Can we do Taqlīd in Usūl al-Dīn?

Imām Muwâffâq al-dīn Ibn Qudāmāh (رحمه الله) said:

"What has been said about the prohibition of Taqlįd is only in matters that are apparent and well-known due to their clarity — without the need for effort, contemplation, or investigation. Such matters include the oneness of Allāh, the prophethood of Muhammad (ﷺ), the knowledge of the obligation of the five daily prayers, fasting during Ramādān, and other pillars of Islām whose obligation is well-known and established by consensus. These matters do not require research or investigation, and thus, it is not permissible to blind follow others in them. However, as for the finer points of belief, the detailed rulings of worship, and business transactions — claiming that everyone must perform Îjtîhād in these matters is an indication of ignorance, and this claim is invalid for the reasons we have mentioned."

(Al-Râdd ‘alā Įbn Aqįl, p. 34)

قال الإمام موفّق الدين ابن قدامة:

"وإنما الذي قيل إنه لا يجوز لهم التقليد هو الأمر الظاهر الذي قد علموه لظهوره من غير احتياج إلى تعب ولا فكر ولا نظر، كتوحيد الله سبحانه وتعالى، ورسالة محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم، ومعرفة وجوب الصلوات الخمس وصوم رمضان وسائر الأركان التي اشتهر وجوبها وعلم ذلك بالإجماع عليها، فلا يحتاج فيه إلى بحث ولا نظر، فهذا لا يجوز تقليدهم فيه. وأما دقائق الاعتقادات وتفاصيل أحكام العبادات والبياعات، فما يقول بوجوب اجتهادهم فيها إلا جاهل، وهو باطل بما ذكرناه."

الرد على ابن عقيل ص ٣٤

[abdullahblogsposts]

Our war with the Mûshrįkįn will remain!

Allāh made the conflict between the people of Tawhīd and the people of Shîrk a tradition without end, as Islām and kûfr must inevitably contend in every place and time. Otherwise, the people of falsehood would seize the land and cause corruption therein through their Shîrk and pursuit of lusts and desires, as is happening today with the crusader takeover and hegemony of the world. Therefore, the eternal divine command for the people of Islām​ is to engage in war with Shîrk and its people, waging Jihād against them with their hands, tongues and hearts. Fighting them was enjoined to make them submit to the rule of Islām, to follow it and obey its rules, as Allāh (tabāraka wa ta’ālā) said, “And fight them until there is no more fitnāh and Dīn is entirely for Allāh” (Al-Anfāl:39). The people of Tawhīd will not stop their war against the Mûshrįkįn until they eliminate the existence of Shîrk in the world, and until there is no rule in it but that of Allāh.

The Knowing and Wise told His Muwāhîd worshipers that the people of Shîrk will always fight them, and that the goal of their fighting is to take them away from Islām and make them equally Mûshrįkįn. Allāh (‘azza wa jall) said, “And they will never cease fighting you until they turn you back from your Dīn if they can. And whosoever of you turns back from his Dīn and dies as a disbeliever, then his deeds will be lost in this life and in the next, and they will be the dwellers of the Fire. They will abide therein forever” (Al-Baqārāh:217). At the same time that Allāh (tabāraka wa ta’ālā) revealed the truth of their war and its purpose, He also warned Muslįmīn and enjoined them to prevent the Mûshrįkįn from succeeding in this war. He told them that the one who commits apostasy from his Dīn and is not patient amid the war of the Mûshrįkįn, thus dying in kûfr, will have lost all he had done of good deeds before his apostasy, even if he was a Muwāhîd, a Muhājir, and a Mujāhid. Allāh (‘azza wa jall) will not excuse the Muslim from fighting against the Mûshrįkįn, as fighting is not a form of ikrāh (unbearable coercion) for which a Muslim is excused if he fell into Shîrk.

How odd it is that we see today many factions and parties that attribute themselves to Islām boasting about not establishing the Dīn or ruling by the Shari’ah! They convince their soldiers and supporters that this is “wisdom” and “good policy” because it avoids fighting of Mûshrįkįn and retaliation from the hypocrites. Instead, they receive silent approval from the tawāghīt and satisfaction from the people of desires. They thus turn a blind eye to the fact that they have achieved the goal of the Mûshrįkįn by committing riddāh (apostasy) from the Dīn of Allāh (tabāraka wa ta’ālā). Thus, they have set aside the purpose of fighting them, which is the same purpose that Allāh (‘azza wa jall) clearly said the Mûshrįkįn will continue fighting the Muslimīn!

He who realizes these facts will understand the reason for the fierce enmity that is shown by the people of Shîrk, in all their various sects and creeds, against the Islāmîc St@tə and its soldiers. He will realize the reason why the enemies of the Dīn gathered to fight it, regardless of their differences and disputes. And he will realize that the war between Islām and Shîrk cannot end in one round or two, but it is a continuous, relentless war, through which each party strives to achieve its purpose. The Islāmic St@tə made the purpose of its Jihād servitude to Allāh (tabāraka wa ta’ālā) by establishing the Dīn in the land, and that is through waging Jihād against the Mûshrįkįn and preserving that which Allāh (‘azza wa jall) has secured for them in the land, as well as seeking to make the Mûshrįkįn and their countries submit to the rule of Allāh (‘azza wa jall), or eradicate them all if they refuse. As for the Mûshrįkįn, they must realize that they will never be able to remove the Muslįmīn from the land, yet they continue striving to force the people of Islām to leave their foundation or push them to abandon some of its pillars or branches.

Today, and after years of war between the Islāmic St@tə and the Mûshrįkįn, a war led by crusader Amərica, the Islāmic St@tə remains firm on its ‘Aqīdāh and its Mânhâj, for which it paid a costly price—the blood of its leaders and soldiers—for the cause of refusing to compromise in Dīn, while many others ceded their entire Dīn for the sake of preserving life, wealth, lands and authority. Thus, Allāh (‘azza wa jall) made the Islāmic St@tə remain, giving it consolidation, after substituting the fallen, atop what they left behind. So let the Mûshrįkįn kill of us as many as Allāh (tabāraka wa ta’ālā) fated them to do so, for Allāh (tabāraka wa ta’ālā) will provide a better successor. Let them capture what Allāh (tabāraka wa ta’ālā) fated them to capture of land, for we will restore it from their hands and more than that, by the permission of Allāh (‘azza wa jall). Let them destroy the cities, villages, and military vehicles as much as Allāh fated them to destroy, for He will compensate us as He has always done. As long as the Dīn is firm and the Mânhâj fixed, and as long as the Banner of ‘Uqāb is pure from the filth of Shîrk and its people, then the Islāmic St@tə will remain and its war will continue against them, by permission of Allāh (subhānahu wa ta’ālā). And the final result is for the Mûttâqīn.!!

Your Brother in Dīn Abdûllāh(TheSlaveOfAllāh)

[abdullahblogsposts]

This is our ‘Aqīdah regarding the Takfīr al-Mushrikīn, we make Takfīr before the establishment of Hujjah on an individual who fell into major Shirk.

This is not the ‘Aqīdah of ‘Ādhirīn & Jahmiyyah Kuffar.

May Allāh keep us steadfast on the Manhaj of Salaf al-Sālih.

[abdullahblogsposts]

‘Ibādah (worship) and Risālah (prophetic message) are two major foundations within Islām, but what’s the greater foundation?

No two muslims dispute that unifying Allāh in worship is the greatest foundation, and Allāh tells us in the Qur’ān that this is the reason He revealed the books and sent the messengers for the jinn and mankind.

However, when you observe the practical reality of what’s considered the greater foundation among the murji’ah and jahmiyyah, it’s the Risālah.

Because if someone claims Prophethood, the murji’ah will agree with us that associating partners in Risālah or Nubuwwah (prophethood) has no excuse whatsoever, and not only is the claimer a kāfir, but all of his followers are.

Similar to how the sahābah made takfīr upon 100,000+ of the followers of false prophets, even though many ascribed to Islām and believed in Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم), but were simply “deceived”, yet this deception wasn’t considered an excuse from being called kuffār.

But if someone associates partners with Allāh, not only in the topic of Hākimiyyah, committing shirk in judgement or even shirk of obedience (leaving off the ruling of Allāh to follow the ruling of a ruler or judge etc...), but in every single aspect of shirk in Ulūhiyyah (such as du’ā, sacrifices, tawāf, vows etc...), the murji’ah have gone into extremes in giving excuses for whoever falls into it, and not only that, but whoever makes takfīr upon the one that negates the greatest foundation of Islām as being from the khawārij!

If this is not misguidance, then I don’t know what misguidance is, wallāhul-musta’ān.

[abdullahblogsposts]

Įbn Taymįyyāh Râhîmāhûllāh regarding the scholars who ingratiate themselves with the rulers and follow them instead of Allāh.

Sheikh al-Islām Abū l-ʿAbbās Įbn Taymįyyāh al-Ḥarrānī - Râh‌îmāhûllaāh - said:

❝If a scholar abandons the knowledge he has received from the Book of Allāh [i.e., the Qurʾān] and the Sunnah of His Messenger - Ṣallā Allāhu ʿalayhi wa-sallam, and instead follows the judgment of a Ruler whose ruling contradicts that of Allāh and His Messenger, he becomes an Murtad [apostate] and a Kāfir, deserving of punishment in both this life and the Hereafter.

Allāh says:

المص * كِتابٌ أُنْزِلَ إلَيْكَ فَلا يَكُنْ فِي صَدْرِكَ حَرَجٌ مِنهُ لِتُنْذِرَ بِهِ وذِكْرى لِلْمُؤْمِنِينَ * اتَّبِعُوا ما أُنْزِلَ إلَيْكُمْ مِن رَبِّكُمْ ولا تَتَّبِعُوا مِن دُونِهِ أوْلِياءَ قَلِيلًا ما تَذَكَّرُونَ

❝Alif Lām Mīm Ṣād. This is the Book sent down to you—let there be no distress in your heart because of it—that you may warn Kuffār with it and as a reminder to the believers. Follow what has been sent down to you from your Lord, and do not take other than Him any allies. Little do you remember.❞ [Qurʾān 7:1-3]

Even if this person is subjected to beating, imprisonment, and various forms of harm to compel him to abandon what he knows of the Sharīʿah of Allāh and His Messenger—which is obligatory to follow upon him—he remains deserving of Allāh’s punishment. He must remain steadfast, even if he faces harm for the sake of Allāh. This is the established way of Allāh for the Prophets and their followers.

Allāh says:

الم * أحسب الناس أن يتركوا أن يقولوا آمنا وهم لا يفتنون * ولقد فتنا الذين من قبلهم فليعلمن الله الذين صدقوا وليعلمن الكاذبين

❝Alif Lām Mīm. Do people think they will be left alone to say, “We believe” without being tested? We indeed tested those before them, and Allāh will surely make evident those who are truthful, and He will surely make evident the liars.❞ [Qurʾān 29:1-3]

And He also says:

ولنبلونكم حتى نعلم المجاهدين منكم والصابرين ونبلو أخباركم

❝And We will surely test you until We make evident those of you who strive and those who are patient, and We will test your affairs.❞ [Qurʾān 47:31]

He also says:

أم حسبتم أن تدخلوا الجنة ولما يأتكم مثل الذين خلوا من قبلكم مستهم البأساء والضراء وزلزلوا حتى يقول الرسول والذين آمنوا معه متى نصر الله ألا إن نصر الله قريب

❝Or do you think that you will enter Paradise while such trial has not yet come to you as came to those who passed on before you? They were touched by poverty and hardship and were shaken until even their messenger and those who believed with him said, “When is the help of Allāh?” Verily, the help of Allāh is near.❞ [Qurʾān 2:214].

End quote.

📕| Majmūʿ al-Fatāwā 35 P. 373.

[abdullahblogsposts]

I Have No One But You! O' Allāh

[abdullahblogsposts]

[This is going to be very hard for Madākhilāh to swallow]

The Fatwā of Shaykh al-‘Allāmah Ḥasan bin Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī bin Ḥusayn bin Muḥammad bin ‘Abdûl-Wahhāb al-Najdī, the leading scholar of Najd in his time, regarding the condition of the people of Kuwait and al-Zubayr, and his reference to Shaykh ‘Abdul lāṭīf bin ‘Abdûl-Raḥmān bin Ḥasan Āl al-Shaykh concerning the takfīr of some apostates from Najd.

Shaykh al-‘Allāmah Ḥasan bin Ḥusayn bin ‘Alī bin Ḥusayn bin Muḥammad bin ‘Abdûl-Wahhāb (raḥimahullāh) said:

“This is one of the greatest causes of apostasy—We seek refuge in Allāh from disgrace. Among them: their acceptance of the Shaytān laws, its enforcement upon them, and their approval of it and their seeking judgment through it. This action itself is also apostasy from Islām.”

📗 ‹ Risālah fī Jawāb mā Yakūn Ḥāl man Yarā anna al-Kuwayt wal-Zubayr Bilād Kufr ›

And he (raḥimahullāh) also said:

“And among them: it is known from their condition that they do not make takfīr of the ruler and his disbelieving soldiers from the Ottoman Romans, and their belief that they are Muslims. This itself is kufr. And it is known from their condition that they mock the Muslimīn and their religion, and they resent the people of tawḥīd and the Islāmic dā‘wâh. The scholars (raḥimahumullāh) have unanimously agreed upon the kufr of anyone who mocks the Book of Allāh, His religion, or His Messenger.”

📗 ‹ Risālah fī Jawāb mā Yakūn Ḥāl man Yarā anna al-Kuwayt wal-Zubayr Bilād Kufr ›

[abdullahblogsposts]

Note this!! He is free from The Rāfîdhā as Įsā' (علیہ سلام ) is free from the Christians & Mūsā (علیہ سلام) is from the Jəws!!

Imam Sadiq (as) said :-

If people knew how god created people and with what differences, no one would blame anyone else.

[abdullahblogsposts]

The statement of the son of Shaykh Muḥammad bîn ‘Abdûl-Wahhāb (raḥimahullāh) contains important words that clarify this meaning:

“And the manifestation of the religion: is by takfīr of them, criticizing their religion, disparaging them, disassociating from them, being cautious of their friendship, Not leaning towards them, and avoiding them; and performing the prayers alone is not sufficient as a manifestation of the religion.

And the statement of the one who says: ‘We avoid them in prayer and do not eat their slaughtered meat’ is good, but it is not sufficient on its own in manifesting the religion; rather, what has been mentioned is necessary.”

📗 ‹ Al-Durâr al-Saniyyāh 8/413 ›

[abdullahblogsposts]

Imām Ibn 'Atīq رحمه الله said:

"And know, may Allāh guide you. That our approach has been that whenever a work on Tafsīr or Hadīth commentary reaches us, we test and examine the author's belief regarding al-‘ulûw, attributes, and actions. We have found that the prevailing view among many or most of the later generations, is the Ash‘arī madhab, which ultimately denies al-'ulûw and interprets the verses on this subject according to the interpretations inherited from Bîshr al-Marīsī and others like him, among the people of innovation and misguidance. Anyone who looks into the commentaries on al-Bukhārī and Muslim, and similar works, will find this present in them."

- [Ad-Dûrâr As-Sannįyyāh vol. 13 pg 25-26.]

[abdullahblogsposts]

Fudayl b. Iyād رحمه الله said:

“Adhere to the path of guidance and you will not be harmed by the few people that follow it. And beware of the paths of misguidance, and do not be deceived by the large numbers of those who are destroyed.”

{al-Itsām (v.1, p.135)}

[abdullahblogsposts]

Imān Ahmâd said in Az-Zuhd [1365]: Abdûl Rahmān told us, on the authority of Mahdī, On the authority of Găîlān, On the auhtority of Mûtârrîf , He said; A Good Companion is Better than Solitude, And Solitude is Better than a Bad Companion!!

[abdullahblogsposts]

‏(التوحيد) عند الجهمية ومَن تبعهم مِن الأشاعرة : هو نفي الصفات ، و (الشركُ) عندهم : هو إثباتُ الصفات .

[Tawhīd] according to Jâhmīyyāh and those who followed them from the Âshā'îrāh: is the negation of the attributes, And [Shîrk] according to them: is the affirmation of the attributes!!

[abdullahblogsposts]

Beware O'Muslims!!

“Indeed this knowledge is Religion, so a man must look from who he is taking his Religion.”

The Imām Muhâmmâd įbn Sįrįn said:

«إِنَّ هَذَا العِلْمَ دِيْنٌ؛ فَانْظُرُواْ عَمَّنْ تَأخُذُوْنَ دِيْنَكُمْ».

“Indeed this knowledge is the religion, so be careful with regards to the one whom you take your religion from” !!