#putting aside how grossly misogynistic that is
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Headcanon: Laurie loses her virginity at 15 and her parents (mostly Kitty) flipped out and acted like she did something shameful. From there on, Kitty began to treat Laurie…differently, leading Laurie to purposefully act out just to spite her mother.
#that 70s show#t7s headcanons#my headcanons#laurie forman#the show acts like Laurie is some ‘mean s*ut’#putting aside how grossly misogynistic that is#I feel like contrary to the characters critiquing her#laurie actually lost it at a reasonable age
5 notes
·
View notes
Note
Genuine non-troll white woman here - you wrote "So I already knew that Good Girls was a white feminism phantasmagoria...But, jesus fucking christ, y'all are just showing your true colours lately. The way you talk about a MOC in relation to a white woman is disgusting." Not asking you to call out specific people or posts or start any kind of flame war but what would be a general example of what you are talking about? I follow a good chunk of people and I'm not seeing this maybe b/c I'm not following the same people, maybe out of willful blindness, maybe I'm not recognizing it - again, b/c of ignorance, etc. Just trying to understand what you mean - and not do it obviously, if I am doing it.
I apologise for taking a longish time to answer this. Honestly, I wasn't sure I wanted to get into it. Anyway, I'd first like to say that this is all my opinion. What bothers me might not bother someone else. BIPOC are not a monolith. Even subsections aren't. Not all Mexican trans men are a monolith. Neither are all Japanese lesbians. You get the idea. And that's not even including people like Ben Carson or Caitlyn Jenner—people who support and work for policies that actively harm the marginalised group of which they are a part. Secondly, I know this isn't your intention, but asking POC to tell you what is ok to do and what is not is a slippery slope to "my [blank] friend said this was ok." Finally, the fandom is quite small so it is pretty hard to give general examples. I don't know if it's more trouble to quote specific posts or not, because some will think it is about them anyway. Anything I'm going to mention I've seen on Tumblr, Instagram, Reddit and/or Twitter. But there are definitely popular Tumblr blogs that all push the same narrative. Oh, and one last thing, I haven't seen any of what I'm referring to from people I follow.
Ok, let's go. For a very long time, mainly WOC have pointed out the racial problems within the show and the extremely dismissive attitude about those problems from mainly white women. And while these same women have written thousands (even tens of thousands) or words about Beth (it's always Beth) and her struggles and the amazingness of such a complex female character (ymmv), they brush aside commentary about racism as either nitpicking, not understanding the show is about the 3 women (tell that to all the white men with fleshed-out storylines), or misogyny. The last is especially hostile because they are often talking over Black women and misogynoir is a very real fucking thing that couples the fun of being hated for being a woman with the delight of good old-fashioned racism. They espouse the idea that people having a problem with Beth are all covert & overt misogynists. But talk out the other side of their mouths that they can't possibly be racist even when they support racism in the show or ignore concerns brought up by fans of colour. And that is just the absolute height of hypocrisy. Because by the former they acknowledge that people in a marginalised group (women) can still be anti- that group (a phenomenon with which I agree). But in the latter, suddenly they don't understand that concept.
Specific to the post you are responding to, fans that purport to like Brio write about the relationship in ways that reveal how much of their enjoyment comes from Rio being inferior to Beth. It's all about what he can do for her, how he acts against his best interests for her, how he literally denies himself sexual pleasure for her. Those are all meant to show how in love he is with her. But the show never bothers to tell us why. And, no, this is not because the show is so deep. Other romantic relationships they have scenes that are explicit about the characters' feelings. But Rio, after being shot, after being betrayed, after being mocked, is just so in love with Beth....because. (MYSTERIOUS!) And the Beth stans are more than fine with this because they think everyone should be as obsessed with Beth as they are. But it's bad storytelling. And, in this particular case, it gets into very dicey racist tropes. A white women treating her Latino lover like an afterthought is not the same as a white women treating her white lover like an afterthought. It just isn't. And if some of these fans are as smart as they pretend to be, they know that. They just don't care. Much like the showrunners.
There was so much talk defending the drawn-out Boland marriage because why can't we understand how hard it is for Beth—who is, at various times, claimed to be emotionally abused by Dean or staying with him because it is safe and comfortable—and we don't appreciate how difficult it is for her (I may be one of the few divorced people talking about this show on Tumblr, so this has always made me laugh). Yet there was nothing but glee when Rio flipped on his brousin (who was written as both abusive and safe) for Beth. Where was the empathy for Rio and how hard it was for him? Especially because, unlike Beth, he didn't even have one parent? Hadn't the Beth stans used her very tragical history™️ to explain away her every shitty act? idk, not having any parents and going to jail (as a minor?) and being betrayed by your family seems pretty tragic. But I didn't see them all of a sudden excusing Rio's bad behaviour. Because, feminism or something?
What about Beth's feelings? Last season she spent trying to have him killed. This season she spent looking annoyed by him. Throughout both she talked down to him in a specific white woman way that every BIPOC has experienced, even if some of them are cool with it. There were multiple opportunites for Beth to talk about her feelings with Ruby and/or Annie, but the writers made the deliberate choice to always make it about sex (and god, the immature way they had these three grown women talk was fucking obnoxious). She spent the last 2 seasons also wanting him out of her life to the point that a majority of her actions in S4 were motivated by getting to Nevada with her husband and kids. Beth doesn't care about Rio but Rio needs to put Beth above everything because he's just so in love like he's never been before (which is blatant Marcus & Rhea erasure). And anyone who doesn't think Beth would have just as happily been sitting on that bench plotting how to "run the city" (hahahahaha!) with Nick if the situation worked out differently hasn't been paying attention.
So, what do we have? A white woman who is constantly excused (by the loudest portion of the fandom) for all her ill treatment to her Black BFF & her Black husband, her Asian coworker, her Latina "friend," and Rio (among others) because her life is hard and who is not required to even be nice to her supposed "endgame". And a MOC who is expected to accept being treated poorly by the white woman because he loves her.
And, a last thing, this attitude grossly crossed over into talk about real people when the fans—who self-righteously claimed to be above anon sources or talking about the actors—latched on to the narrative and enjoyed blaming the MOC actor for the cancellation of the show, even dragging his insignificant (in terms of influence) Black wife into it. All while conveniently ignoring that the creator/showrunner is a white woman. The star & producer is a white woman. The people making the decisions at NBCU & Netflix were white women. All white women with so much more power than the Latino actor.
Shit, did I answer your question? I know this is a lot. But I could honestly make mulitple posts on each issue I touched on here. Basically, white people ain't slick, be they content creators or fans. We see how & what y'all talk about. We see that Rio not having a last name is not a big deal to you and we know why that is. So we're fucking tired. And we're over a show that had so much potential crapping all over their POC characters to prop up a white woman. And we're repulsed by the white women in the fandom who use their tears to seem oppressed and who toss around the word misogynist because POC dare call a Karen a Karen.
#nbc good girls#good girls nbc#racism in the text#racism in fandom#fragile whiteness#white feminism#what fandom chooses to talk about#and what it chooses to ignore#anon asks
31 notes
·
View notes
Note
A lot of Makorra shippers only moved on because they’re afraid of being called homophobic for not shipping korrasami. I LITERALLY saw someone on Instagram yesterday call a makorra shipper homophobic just for saying korrasami came out of nowhere. Also, Korrasami shippers LOVE to bring up the "popping bottles" backlash to make fun of makorra shippers. I left the tlok fandom in 2014 bc it was so toxic as a teenager, but now i’m 23. I’m no longer afraid of shipping something i always loved.
Ah, yes, I realized I didn’t address the fandom's toxicity in the last ask, but I’ve spoken about it before. I don't talk too much about the past because I was at the edge of the fandom back in 2014/2015. I was aware of fights, but the discussions I saw were moreso on bi-erasure. I saw one post saying it was wrong to ship Makorra. I remember being really confused about why Makorra was actually problematic, but I didn’t appreciate being told who I can ship the only dark-skinned woman protagonist on a major television network with. Why are you forcing me to ignore Mako and Korra’s relationship? Book 1 is practically about Mako and Korra, all other characters be damned. Me preferring the story of one pairing and a popular romance trope, second chances, is not wrong, and no one would know how I view the LGBT+ community based on who I ship in one show.
I ended up leaving the community because I was disappointed with season 4 in general. When Korra was released on Netflix, I figured it was time to rewatch the series again (plus, I’ve been binging all my favorite romance anime). So imagine my shock when I created a new Tumblr and Twitter account to rant and rave about TLOK, and I saw nothing but hate and name-calling in the Makorra tags. I saw people casually throwing around the word “homophobic,” and one person said people who don’t like Korrasami are just misogynistic.
I just wanted pretty pictures, and people are out here psychoanalyzing shippers! So, I dug through some blogs and to feel more grounded with this fandom I didn’t recognize. After reading through their commentaries and experiences, I actually became more upset at Bryke than the teenagers/children who comment on Makorra posts saying how much better Korrasami is or accuse Makorra shippers of being homophobic.
Yes, I truly believe these comments are mostly coming from people in their late teens and younger, at least in 2020. I can’t speak on 2014/2015, but since we were younger, the early 20s/late teens, I wonder if our age group was also the loudest. Don’t get me wrong, adults can be horrible people and can get really nasty. However, every time I look up the rudest commenters' profiles, they were teens. When one Korrasami shipper wrote “screw Makorra” on my AMV, I figured I’d have some fun trolling them until I clicked on their profile and saw a child. Needless to say, I ignored them and reflected on how parents are allowing their babies on TikTok while my parents freaked out at the idea of showing my picture on FB growing up.
*I’m not still mad about that*
Also, while it doesn’t give anyone an excuse to make such a strong accusation, part of me, as a straight person, feels like I can’t get too upset because I also become very aware of my privilege. The space I’m in is a majority of young LGBT+ fans (at least on Twitter where I’ve seen the most toxicity). Some people see TLOK as their safe space and imply why should there be Makorra shippers when they have all these other cis/het shows they can engage with. It doesn’t work like that, of course. TLOK doesn’t only feature Bi characters. They’re POC/Indigenous, women, and Korra has dark skin. That’s a lot of marginalized communities. Makorra/TLOK is my comfort show, not because she’s with a man, but because of the reasons I just listed. Also shipping Korra with Mako doesn’t mean she’s no longer bi. She’d still be attracted to women.
Here’s who I am upset with tho, Bryke. Mostly Bryan. While Makorra shippers called out Korrasami shippers for cyberbullying, the focus seemed to be on Bryan for making it seem like there was something wrong with them for not finding Korrasami’s narrative satisfying. It was especially sad to read bloggers who identified as being part of the LGTB+ community saying Bryan’s hetero-lens dismissed their experience and then having to defend/proving themselves to anonymous messengers.
Fans saw it as a betrayal. They saw it as the go-head for the rude Korrasami shippers to harass Makorra artists because they “didn’t watch the show correctly.” When the creator, the person you admire, also puts the blame on you, that kind of pain is on another level.
Korrasami shippers played a huge role in kicking Makorra shippers out of the fandom, but we can’t underestimate how much Bryan’s statement is a slap in the face. He used his characters and social justice as a shield for reasonable criticism. Just because we say a story is bad and Asami is grossly underwritten doesn’t mean that we’re against the idea of Korra and Asami being a couple.
Of course, I’ve seen some very problematic statements from Makorra shippers. After all, homophobia is real. However, aside from the actual bigots, people have no issue with Korrasami. They just wanted a stronger connection between the girls. Many people seem to think Makorra shippers were looking for more romance, but we know we couldn't expect that. We can expect more screentime, musical cues, and more emotional support, which most people can see as platonic, but be romantic if you really want to. Mako’s interactions in book 4 can be seen as platonic, but all of us Makorra shippers saw it to be romantic.
Popping bottles! I completely missed that joke in 2014 and I discovered it this year. I agree it’s pretty annoying, but I become a troll and say I’m popping bottles for my Makorra moments. I don’t get any engagement, but I don’t seem to lose followers for it. Maybe popping bottles represents “straight-baiting?” I don’t get it why it’s so funny after all this time, but we’re Makorra shippers. We’re the joke 🙄
Anyways, to wrap up, lately, there seems to be a bit of a shift on Twitter. When I first created an account. I stayed in my little corner live-tweeting about TLOK and Makorra. I had to stop looking at the Makorra tag because it was so negative. Now, I’m seeing people admit they’re cute, and then saying they’re platonic soulmates. I’ll take it, although, as one commenter said, “that’s boring!”
Someone led a Makorra Week back in October, and it was really nice! I have feeling people speaking up on the name-calling and reminding people that we’re talking about 2D characters helped. We just want to be left alone and enjoy the scenes we have in the show, art, and fanfiction.
Keep shipping who you want! Don’t let any stranger shame you for your shipping preferences, especially in fiction! I’m so happy you feel more comfortable shipping these two dorks! You’re not alone! I’ve been a Makorra shipper since 2012, and while I find Korrasami cute (I love Korra, and I love Asami), Makorra is my OTP. I really like them, and I think they were meant for each other.
82 notes
·
View notes
Note
I know you dont watch GoT anymore. And that Braime and Sansa are your favorites. But I know you've read the books and are obviously really interested in the story. And I was just wondering what your thoughts are on the whole Jon killing Dany thing? Is that something you can see happening in the books? And if it is do you think it'd be in the same context as the show did it?
Ahaha, welp. Just jumping right in there.
(Also, you never have to apologise for asking GOT/ASOIAF questions. I obviously have been a fan for 16 years and wrote fuckin’ TNR with its half-million-plus words, so I clearly do have Thoughts on the story/characters, especially with the bag of lukewarm cat vomit that was s8 of the show.)
I already answered this ask discussing how much I hated the Mad Queen Dany thing, both because a) it was horrifically badly handled and b) these mediocre misogynist douchegobblers have managed to outdo themselves in terms of the gross messages they’ve sent about women, after 8 seasons of that. (These are the same people who made Sansa say that she was grateful for her rapes and who claimed that Dany’s turn into madness was foreshadowed by her having a “chilly” reaction to the death of her abuser, Viserys, in s1, so…. make of that what you will.) I’m not saying that it was narratively impossible, especially since GRRM has been toying with the same thing in the books and has more than his own share of Male Author Syndrome. But at the start of 8x04, Dany is in Winterfell, perfectly sane, toasting Arya as hero of the battle. By the end of 8x06, she’s crazy, a war criminal, and dead, murdered by her boyfriend, because… well, something something plot reasons. Even if you didn’t like Dany or were rooting for her to go mad or whatever, that was wildly badly handled.
I personally think it would be pretty gross for GRRM to also go down the Mad Queen route, though at least if he does, we will have had Dany’s POV chapters beforehand and presumably something resembling a justification and a building narrative momentum toward it. But she also got stuck in Meereen for so long because by his own admission he didn’t know what to do with her there or how to get her out of the situation and moved onto Westeros, which remains, theoretically, her outstanding goal in the books. It would obviously not be outside the realm of possibility for this to happen, given GRRM’s focus on “grittiness” that the show took to max factor 5000. I would still find it reductive and trying to make a Clever Postmodern Point and etc if it happened in the books, because literally why invest us in a character this long, especially one who has tried so hard to overcome the circumstances of her past/to not be her father, and then just do exactly that? Obviously there would be elements of Shakespearean tragedy to it, and if done well it could be compelling, but I personally just have a different approach to fiction and what people want out of a story (especially one now as famous as GOT/ASOIAF and how universally betrayed everyone seems to feel by the ending). I’m not saying Dany’s ultimate ending needs to be sunshine and roses and getting what she wants, because often character arcs and resolutions become all the more powerful for being subverted and thwarted (think the “I said I wanted [x] but [y] was there instead” sort of endings). But whatever it is, it needs to be…. not that.
Also, Jon in both books and especially show has been the epitome of Mediocre White Man. I stopped watching in s4, but Kit Harington’s acting was so wooden and the writing for him was very much Standard Misunderstood Brooding Fantasy Hero that I could barely pay attention to his scenes. I find him somewhat more interesting in the books, though ADWD dragged for everyone and it was obvious GRRM was writing in circles. But everyone has noticed that especially in the show, Jon does absolutely bupkis. His ass is constantly saved by the women in his life, he makes an absolute hash of any power that he is given and doesn’t want it anyway, and his ultimate ending was…. going back to the Night’s Watch (as their idea of satisfying narrative storytelling is to literally put everyone back where they were in the very first episode, apparently). Never mind the fact that there’s no need for the Night’s Watch, but the point is, even the fact that Jon is Rhaegar and Lyanna’s son ended up being relevant for like half an episode. That has been one of the major plot points/secrets of the books (although not so much anymore) and it just…. fizzled out like a damp squib. Dany actually TRIED for multiple seasons to be a good ruler and to learn how to handle power and become a queen, so for her to have to be the one to die for Jon to once again do diddlysquat is… well, as I have said before, the misogyny leaps out. They ended up wasting so much potential and so many other things that were also foreshadowed (and far more convincingly than “wah wah she was gonna go evil!”). For this? So Jon can just go brood in the snow again? Cool.
Not to mention, I find it gross on principle that Dany’s boyfriend had to be the one to kill her, especially after rape/sexual violence/loss of agency was such a big part of her early-season storylines (and how horrifyingly and grossly that has been handled on the show overall). We’re obviously supposed to sympathize with Jon in this scenario and to feel that it is justified to “stop a tyrant” or whatever. Also, if the episode was going to be called “Queenslayer,” why the fuck wasn’t it Jaime fulfilling the valonqar prophecy, another thing they forgot about, and killing Cersei, at great personal grief/cost, to once more stop an insane monarch from burning down King’s Landing? But that, of course, would be actual character development/overall arc, and they preferred to also trash that by having Jaime “killed Aerys Targaryen literally to save half a million innocent people and lived with his reputation being destroyed ever after” Lannister unironically claim that he never cared about the lives of the innocent and only wanted Cersei. After she again tried to kill him and Tyrion like three days ago, not even to mention what they did to Brienne and with that whole arc, but I will have a ragestroke if I think about it too much.
Basically, the ending wasn’t “bittersweet.” It was tragic, reductionist, ham-handed, hugely disappointing for everyone who put years of investment into these characters, and ended up in the amusing position of making Bran Stark the younger and more beautiful queen who comes to cast Cersei down. He became king because… reasons? Whatever? And he knows literally everything about everyone thanks to being the Three-Eyed Raven, so there’s no way that can go horribly wrong. He has basically done nothing except sit in a wheelchair and look creepy for several years now, his arc has never been remotely about being king, and Isaac Hempstead-Wright himself is apparently on record as saying he genuinely thought it was a joke script when he read it. This after both Emilia Clarke and Kit Harington broke down over learning what happened to their characters/Kit apparently realized it for the first time at the read-through and was horrified. Emilia already talked about wandering for five hours and having a crisis and calling her mom and asking to be talked off the ledge like….. fictional choices/characters completely aside, that’s a gross thing to do to your actors. I know they’re all proud of their work and they have apparently and understandably been defensive about the existence of the petition to rewrite s8, but they’ve all been pretty clear, while still being professional and supportive, that there is stuff that they’re just as much WTF about as we are.
Basically, as everyone keeps saying, the acting, cinematography, visual effects, music, etc was clearly up to as high a standard as ever, but was betrayed fundamentally and comprehensively by this god-awfully shit writing by a couple of hacks who clearly rushed the final season to get on to ruining working on Star Wars. They have also been on record about saying “you can’t do what the audience expects or it’ll get boring blah blah blah,” which is a profoundly flawed storytelling strategy if you’re paranoid and trying to outsmart your audience and do something that nobody has ever thought of because you’re an Intellectual Postmodern Commentator On Our Violent Society. If your audience can guess where a story is going, but are still surprised by major twists along the way that then make sense in hindsight, you’ve done your job. If you’re relying on grimdark and cramming in gimmicky plot twists and deus ex machinas and Shocking Moments rather than authentically developing your story, it’s going to bite you in the ass in a big way, as was just proven.
Nobody expected a completely happy ending from GoT. But the fact that they went to such lengths, especially in s8, to build up characters/ships (Jonerys, Braime, Gendrya were all torched after major canon moments completely unexpected by fans, especially the latter two – why even include it unless to just be more Tragique, and Gendrya is the only one that has even a chance in the future since half of it didn’t end up idiotically dead) and then just wrecked all of it…. as I’ve said, good endings don’t need to be rainbows and unicorns and kittens. But if you’ve asked eight years of audience investment, there has to be something that makes it worth it and that doesn’t make everyone feel like they were duped and stupid to get involved in the first place. They have been beating the “it’s a hard world and bad things happen to the characters” drum for all they’re worth, but… it’s just bad. You can analyse and ask why the hell they did things and so forth, but it’s bad. At this rate, the show should have either ended after 8x03, or they should have taken the money HBO offered and done the proper 10 episodes and let Bryan Cogman write all of them. He was the only one who appeared to remotely give a shit about the characters, and since D&D wrote the last four episodes themselves, yeah, this disaster is on them.
Fortunately, I left the show years ago and have TNR and am used to ignoring their version of things. And I knew all along that they never really got the characters or the story. But I feel really bad for everyone who has had this thrown back in their face, and it seems like a communal disenchantment with this ending is going to enter the pop-culture consciousness on a possibly unprecedented level. So if GRRM does do the Mad Queen Dany killed by Jon in the books (though he has apparently called the show’s ending “traumatic”), I’ll probably still not like it. He has a chance to sell me it on/justify it to me narratively, which the show categorically failed to do. I don’t think I will, just because as I said, I don’t like anything about it, but yes.
Anyway. This is a long post already, and I probably have more to say still, but it’s pretty obvious I think it’s just really, really bad, and that’s about the essence of it.
53 notes
·
View notes
Note
I'd really urge you to read some of the articles that I compiled above, because honestly, a lot of what you're saying is perpetuating the misogynistic misinformation that is currently swallowing up this trial.
What Amber did was not abusive, because mutual abuse is a myth. Johnny had all of the power in their relationship, and it was revealed throughout the trial that he'd been abusing her for at least a year before she started fighting back. What she did in order to defend herself and survive in the relationship was not healthy, but as that article, and many legitimate psychologists say, it was not abuse. Also her 'lies' have been grossly exaggerated by Depp's camp and his fans - something the articles I listed above also document.
What Johnny has done is classic DARVO - Deny, Attack and Reverse Victim and Offender - and he has done that every step of the way. This is quintessential abuser behaviour and is done to manipulate the victim into thinking they are the abuser. You can read a lot about that in the articles I listed above.
Demanding Amber press charges (and I will say here that she did request a restraining order which was granted in 2016) and seek justice to what - - prove her legitimacy as a victim? - - is hugely ignorant, and it further perpetuates this idea that there's a 'right way' to behave as a victim. This trial has shown how terribly the justice system treats abuse survivors, even ones with mountains of evidence like Amber has, and even putting that aside, what she does in the aftermath of abuse is actually none of your or my business. She owes nobody anything.
To insinuate that she's the one drawing this out too when it's Johnny who's using the legal system to prolong this abuse and humiliate her is misinformed. He's the one who's taken her to court, god, he's the one who's taken her to court in a state neither of them live or work in for their lack of anti-SLAPP legislation, and he's the one who's perpetuated DARVO behaviour now on a global stage.
And just for the record, saying that this was 'the worst hill for people to start making this point on' is ignorant twice over - it's a very important conversation to be having, and if you think this conversation has started with Amber Heard and not been one feminists have been having for decades, you have some serious history to catch up on.
Wait do you think Amber was innocent? She's clearly a f***ing nutcase... she made a mockery of actual abuse victims
Some reading for you, anon:
The Depp-Heard Trial is a Vector for Misogynystic Misinformation , Logically
Why the Depp-Heard trial is so much worse than you realize: Amber Heard is just the first target of a new extremist playbook, Vox
Misinformation and baseless rumors about Amber Heard rack up millions in views during Depp defamation trial, Insider
The Online Hate for Amber Heard, Pursuit
The Daily Wire Spent Thousands of Dollars Promoting Anti-Amber Heard Propaganda, Vice
The Amber Heard-Johnny Depp trial was an orgy of misogyny, The Guardian
TikTok’s Amber Heard Hate Machine, NY Times
Misleading YouTube Videos About Depp v. Heard Trial Thrive On the Platform, NewsWeek
Who won the Depp-Heard trial? Content creators that went all-in, Washington Post
Why Are So Many Survivors Supporting Johnny Depp? Harpers Bazaar
The Anti-Feminist Energy Fueling the Johnny Depp Misinformation Campaign, Mel Magazine
Why the Internet Hates Amber Heard, The Atlantic
#thank you to meggiry for jumping in too#i've replied in good faith to this one#so i hope you're open to hearing it#anti johnny depp#amber heard#tw abuse
899 notes
·
View notes
Note
Okay, so I’m fairly certain this anon is referencing my tag, so with that in mind I’m going to respond to their message and everything I say is directed at them, not the loganandveronica blog or the member that answered, considering they were only going by what anon said.
So first of all @ me next time anon, literally. You could have taken up your issue with me and I would have said to you what I’m going to say now anyway.
Here are my exact tags, which is funny because they put so much emphasis on “ruined” and that’s not even the word I used??:
#aw this whole scene was cute #and then v had to mess it up by the end (again) haha
Mess it up and ruin are I guess similar but not the same. And by “the end” yes I did mean the end of the alterna prom sequence, not the very end of the episode. And literally all I meant was that she ran away, and I was like 80% joking by saying she messed it up. Thus the “haha”. How that got turned into “grossly misogynistic” I have no idea????? I guess you’re using my comment as a jumping off point to rant about other stuff you’ve seen, which isn’t fair tbh but anyway. Oh and you also added words that I didn’t say, I didn’t say anything about “immediately responding”. Which is why I almost wasn’t sure this was about me but I checked the other tags and unless tumblr isn’t showing me one I’m the only one that matches the “complaint”.
I wasn’t talking about the very end, but since it was brought up, I’m not sure why you’d even say Logan was in the wrong. In my actual opinion (not just tags I’m writing in the moment that are really only reflective of my brain casually thinking of what could have been in that ep and not a serious commentary on Veronica’s actions), neither of them was in the wrong. Veronica wasn’t ready to talk about it but didn’t articulate herself well so Logan (rightfully tbh) assumed she was rejecting him and turned to Kendall in his drunken and sad state. I don’t see anything wrong in what he did aside from the fact that it was crappy timing/misunderstanding. And yeah the same can be said for V.
So anyway sorry to @loganandveronica for getting stuck in the middle of this but since they didn’t send the ask to me this was my only choice in responding and not letting myself be vilified for something I really didn’t do.
Is it just me or are people in this fandom GROSSLY misogynistic and horrible towards Veronica? I looked at the tags on your recent post from the Epic Speech ep and someone was talking about how she """"ruined""" the scene by not immediately responding to Logan? I'm so confused because it was clearly Logan who was in the wrong, narrative-wise, at the end of the ep? I find this to be a really common pattern with fanfic in the fandom as well. Not sure if it's just me feeling some kinda way but ugh
Hi anon! I feel a bit uncomfortable answering stuff like this (I don’t like to put anyone on blast and this blog has a lot of followers) but I’ll give it a shot because I get where you’re coming from and it’s something that has really bothered me in the past as well. It’s definitely not just you. So, I didn’t see those particular tags and I’m not going to check for them now* but I do think that’s a weird interpretation of that episode. Obviously, everyone is entitled to their own opinions, but I have no idea why everyone loves to play the blame game re: their relationship and - as I’ve said before - I will never understand why that’s the biggest point of discourse in the fandom.
I think the narrative intention was meant to sympathise with both characters but I can’t understand how someone would see how hurt Veronica was by Logan sleeping with Kendall and think that Veronica was in the wrong? When in every episode where Logan has those sad eyes, regardless of what he’s done, people seem to side with him. Not sure if that’s what you’re referring to or just Veronica leaving the party. If it’s the latter, I think it was clear that she was very confused about her feelings and needed to sort them out - she literally came back the next morning and said, ‘First let me say that I’m sorry for running out last night like I did. I was a bit overwhelmed; I needed to collect my thoughts, think about what you said.’. It could be that the person who tagged that simply forgot this bit, but I do 100% agree with you that the fandom tends to be very misogynistic in their judgement of Veronica, which is something I don’t get. If she’s so terrible and cruel to Logan, why do you even want them to be together?
I’ve read a lot of those fanfics too, and I even notice the underlying misogyny in the comments of fanfic that isn’t at all like that. A lot of the discourse in confessions posts and (admittedly) a lot of tags I view on my gifsets have similar views. I find this whole mindset to be quite strange because, despite the many faults of the show, I’ve never felt that Veronica was being blamed by the narrative for… being a person with feelings(?) or having a personality beyond Understanding Girlfriend. Jason Dohring definitely does the hurt puppy-eyes really well but I think Kristen Bell is also fantastic at conveying Veronica’s emotions in those scenes.
While I obviously really like the ship, I can’t speak to other people’s interpretations of the characters and the relationship. I will say that this also annoys me a lot and has really deterred me from engaging with a lot of people in the fandom (or at least, it did back in 2013/14 when I was active on here). Also just wanted to say: fanfic is meant to be fun, so I’m not trying to critique anyone here, but I do stay away from reading those authors and you’ll never see any such fic recommended on this blog. However, I’d highly recommend our fanfic tag for some great recs because the fandom has a lot of lovely authors whom I find to be very nuanced and fair in their portrayal of the Logan/Veronica relationship. I’m sure the awesome followers of this blog could also provide some recs!
I really hope you don’t feel bad or annoying for sending this! I’m just treading lightly because tumblr scares me lmao. I’ve seen a few discussions on this within the fandom iirc and I’m sure you’ll find a lot of people who feel similarly (including myself; I’d be happy to discuss this privately on my main blog if you’re up for it). Alternatively, you could just keep following this blog for all your Logan and Veronica needs and I promise to never bring that kind of content on here! :)
*I’d also like to request that anyone who does check the tags and sees who posted it does not send any hate to the blogger, please. We don’t know what their intentions were and I’m sure they didn’t expect this post. It’s pretty easy to be civil and kind while still having a constructive conversation.
- Merah
#jfc i guess i cant add commentary now without stopping to consider if someone is gonna misinterpret & blow up my intentions#fandom nonsense#i’d address the rest of their comments that arent specific to my tag#but im at work and dont have the time or energy#almost ruined marshmallow monday for me anon
20 notes
·
View notes