#public utility vehicle modernization program

[techno2025]

Modern jeepneys with traditional designs at Araneta Center Jeepney Terminal

Iconic jeepney on steroids

[mariellaolden]

NO TO JEEPNEY PHASEOUT !!!!!!

SAY HELLO TO A WORSENED TRANSPORT CRISIS BY 2024

By: Mariella Angela H. Olden (December 28, 2023 | 9:25 PM)

Following a meeting with transportation officials, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. said on December 12 that no further extensions for consolidation of public utility vehicles (PUV) shall be granted.

One of the cultural markers of Philippine identity is the jeepney. Jeepneys have been the primary mode of transportation for Filipinos due to its affordability and accessibility, particularly for students and workers. Furthermore, it has traditionally been the primary occupation of drivers and operators.

In June 2017, the government established the Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP), intending to replace and eventually phase out traditional jeepneys to improve public transportation. However, with the impending phaseout of jeepneys by December 31, 2023, drivers and operators will be forced to purchase costly modern vehicles supported by the government.

Data from the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) indicates that five days before the consolidation deadline, 31,058 traditional jeepneys, or 73.5% of them in Metro Manila, have yet to be consolidated. These unconsolidated units are highly not a minority.

Why should drivers, operators, commuters, and workers fight back? Among the many effects of the PUVMP is the increase in the minimum fare that will continue to make Filipinos suffer. The PUV Modernization program is a business. Corporations and large businesses will take over and have the advantage of raising fares to pay for expensive "modern jeeps." In contrast, this is a big disadvantage to the families of the drivers and operators, who will sink into debt due to the burden of the monthly payment of the modernized vehicle.

In addition, the Department of Energy and LTFRB has reported that the number of registered vehicles in the Philippines exceeds 9 million. Just over 250,000, equivalent to 2% of jeepneys, make up the total.

More detrimental effects of this program include the modern jeepney being way more expensive than the traditional jeepney. The price of a typical jeepney ranges from P150,000 to P250,000. The cost of operating a modern e-jeepney will rise by 1,766.7% to P2.8 million for drivers and operators. Although P160,000 will be given as a subsidy according to LTFRB, which amounts to a mere 5.7% of the jeepney's entire cost, jeepney drivers will be forced to make at least more earnings each day to be able to settle their loan if they were to switch to the modern jeepney.

By the year 2024, the mass transport crisis in the country will worsen. The government cannot fill such a large and significant gap in public transport in the country. With the influx of imported cars, many local manufacturers and industries will be affected.

The PUVMP program is forcefully erasing one of the main parts of our identity as Filipinos and only in favor of a few rich and foreign interests, making the Filipino masses suffer, further impoverished, and left behind.

Drivers, operators, commuters, and workers—

Unite and fight for #NoToJeepneyPhaseout #NoToPUVPhaseout #NoToPUVModernizationProgram!

[upismediacenter]

OPINION: STOP THE E-JEEP! #NoToJeepneyPhaseout

Commuter or not, every Filipino is familiar with jeepneys. Once dubbed “King of the Roads”, jeepneys are a symbol of Philippine culture and resourcefulness, as they were made from converted jeeps left by American troops after World War II. As the most popular public transport vehicle in our country for decades, these jeepneys are now at risk of disappearing, causing public uproar.

The controversy surrounding the phasing out of jeepneys first sparked in 2017 when the government launched the Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP). The program’s goal is to replace the old model jeepneys with modern electronic jeepneys (e-jeeps) that are claimed to guarantee cleaner emissions and improved safety. This has been met with several worries that could adversely affect the Filipino populace.

Public unrest over the jeepney phaseout has been going on for years. The consolidation deadline for Public Utility Vehicles (PUVs) which included jeepneys, UV Expresses, and Filcab units was extended three times. The first was due to the COVID-19 pandemic and multiple protests from transport groups, which affected the government’s original plan to consolidate PUVs in March 2020. As a result, it was rescheduled at the end of last year, December 31, 2023. The second extension was on January 31, 2024, to allow unconsolidated PUVs to ply their routes with the stipulation of being barred from joining cooperatives and corporations. The third and “final” deadline was on April 30, 2024—three months after the last deadline—to allow driver-operators one last time to consolidate, or else they would not be allowed to ply their routes. Amid these several deadlines, protests and strikes are unwavering as dissents push for the PUVMP to be suspended, arguing that imposing deadline extensions does not address the structural problems of the modernization program.

One day before the “final” deadline, the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB) declared that unconsolidated jeepneys have a 15-day leeway to continue their usual routes before they are impounded. Again, this is another smokescreen from the systemic issues brought by the modernization program. The PUVMP must be suspended, as it ostensibly presents more problems than solutions. If the PUVMP truly is for the people, why is there a persistent and contentious pushback by the public?

Enforcing deadlines and giving grace periods for jeepney drivers only delays—the government must suspend the PUVMP and reevaluate its effectiveness. Displacing and disenfranchising jeepney drivers from their livelihoods defeats the purpose of an inclusive and sustainable program as the PUVMP endorses itself to be.

Who are those affected?

Jeepney drivers are most affected by the modernization program. If they choose not to consolidate with cooperatives and corporations or cannot afford an e-jeep alone, their vehicles will be impounded, taking away their only source of income. Additionally, commuters, UP Diliman constituents, and other sectors also have to bear the cost of the PUVMP due to the policies and funds allocated to this program.

The transport group for jeepney drivers, Pagkakaisa ng mga Samahan ng Tsuper at Opereytor Nationwide, more commonly known as PISTON, is the leading opposition group against the PUVMP. First established in 1981, PISTON serves as an organization that aims to promote the welfare and democratic rights of jeepney drivers. In 2013, they launched a campaign against the oil price hike, directed at the country’s main petroleum companies, namely Petron, Shell, and Chevron. Since the government has revealed plans to phase out jeepneys over 15 years old, they have been organizing protests against the PUVMP, criticizing its anti-poor policies and prioritizing for-profit corporate consolidation.

The PUVMP pressures jeepney drivers to switch to e-jeeps or new combustion engine vehicles that meet Euro IV emission standards which only permit carbon monoxide (CO) emissions of 1.0g/km for gasoline and 0.5g/km for diesel vehicles. Units and parts that make up the e-jeep are imported from other countries, which is why they are priced as high as PHP 3 million. While the modernization program offers subsidies of PHP 160 thousand through loan programs by the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) and the Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) to help offset the costs, this amount is only 5.7% of the total cost of a modern jeepney. Jeepney drivers state that they will need to make around PHP 3.5 thousand each day to pay off the debt from switching to an e-jeep, but at the moment, they only make around PHP 2 thousand a day.

The large amount of money that needs to be spent transitioning to modern e-jeeps is the main concern of dissent to this program. Replacing a huge fleet of jeepneys requires massive resources, taking away from vital sectors such as education and healthcare. Additionally, the PUVMP disproportionately affects low-income citizens—specifically, jeepney drivers who mostly come from low-income families and struggle to meet the high e-jeep cost. The debt burden forces them to work longer hours just to break even, negatively impacting their livelihood. Jeepney drivers worry that the transition to e-jeeps or new combustion engine vehicles will exacerbate their financial burdens and force them to work longer hours just to break even.

Furthermore, units from local manufacturing companies such as eFrancisco Motor Corporation and Sarao Jeepneys are still priced at around PHP 2.5 million, further putting jeepney drivers at odds with the financial burden of the PUVMP. With large corporations dominating the market and the PUVMP’s policy to consolidate driver-operators to cooperative-led fleets, this raises concerns of corporate takeover and the economic marginalization of jeepney drivers. Since large companies are the ones who have the capacity to fully adhere to the program, jeepney drivers are left disenfranchised because of their financial disadvantage.

Commuters are also affected heavily by this program. Modern jeeps usually charge higher fares because, aside from the initial cost of modernization, their maintenance and repair costs are higher than the traditional jeepneys’. This adds more financial problems to Filipinos already facing higher living expenses as a result of inflation rates. Moreover, unfamiliar technology could present a significant challenge for traditional drivers transitioning to modern jeepneys, leading to potential operational difficulties and increased maintenance expenses.

Constituents of UP Diliman (UPD) share similar concerns. The UP Transport Group (UPTG), which consists of jeepney drivers from all routes around the campus such as Ikot, Toki, UP-Pantranco, UP-Philcoa, and UP-Katipunan, organized a silent strike on December 13, 2023, in protest of the earlier December 31 deadline. Based on interviews with the UPD Vice Chancellor for Community Affairs Roehl Jamon, UP jeepney drivers may have to comply with the modernization. According to Jamon, the only two options they have are for the university to pay for the units themselves, which cost about PHP 1.4 to 3 million each, or for the university to partner with transport cooperatives that already own modernized units and invite them to service the campus, which is the less expensive option between the two. Although the latter is cheaper, this still gives way for corporations to take advantage of the modernization program.

Jeepneys are extensively used by UP college students and students of UP Integrated School (UPIS) for commuting to and from the university campus because they charge less than other PUVs. However, these fares could be completely changed by the PUVMP’s effect on jeepney availability and rates, possibly altering their daily commutes by making them spend more on transport alternatives or by forcing them to look for different routes. This might put additional financial burden as well as longer hours of travel in their everyday life, affecting not only their academic performance but also their general welfare.

Moreover, the PUVMP is taking attention and funding from other sectors that have more pressing needs. In particular, the Department of Education (DepEd) is significantly impacted by lack of funding. Classroom and teacher shortages have been notable areas of concern with an estimated 165,444 classrooms and nearly 90,000 teachers needed. According to DepEd, PHP 105 billion would be needed each year up until 2030 to address the classroom shortage, while PHP 5.6 billion would be needed to hire 20,000 teachers in the upcoming school year, as discussed in the Senate plenary deliberations on the proposed 2024 national budget. Aside from the education sector, the Department of Health (DOH) has been grappling with vaccine shortages, namely pertussis, which has led to 54 infant deaths since the beginning of the year. According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), in 2022, the Philippines was among the top 5 contributors to the 18 million zero-dose children in the world. Despite this and multiple warnings from health authorities, the Philippines still hasn’t fully addressed this vaccine gap, leaving one million unvaccinated Filipino children vulnerable and susceptible to life-threatening diseases such as polio, measles, and tuberculosis. In light of these issues, resources should be prioritized in these matters instead of the PUVMP. Action must be taken immediately to address these pressing concerns and ensure the well-being of the Filipino people.

Are E-jeeps really the “better option”?

According to a study by the Center for Energy, Ecology, and Development (CEED), jeepneys only make up about 2% of the total registered vehicles in the nation and PUVs only contribute about 15% of the total particulate matter emissions in Metro Manila. If the PUVMP aims to transform our public transportation into becoming more sustainable and environmentally friendly, this number does not justify the relentless pressure on jeepney drivers to consolidate. The PUVMP will only contribute 2% to the country’s vehicles that cause pollution. This raises the question of the significance of its impact on saving the environment and reducing emissions in the long run. Additionally, modern jeepneys still run on fossil fuels, such as petroleum oil, defeating the purpose of the program’s goal of creating a more environmentally friendly public transport system. In the same study by CEED, it was argued that solely focusing modernization efforts on jeepneys to reduce air pollution would be negligible. Taking this into account, the government should instead consider upgrading traditional jeepneys to meet the proposed emission standards which would be cheaper for the program.

Furthermore, as said in a paper by the UP Center for Integrative and Developmental Studies, drawing from the current rate of assembly of modern jeepneys, it will take an estimated 270 years before all traditional jeepneys in the country are replaced. This begs the question of why the government keeps enforcing deadlines when it will take almost three centuries before all jeepneys are replaced with e-jeeps.

The PUVMP, while well-intentioned, presents a flawed solution. The environmental costs being too high, the unjust burden on the poor, and the uncertain consequences of such a drastic transition are strong arguments for reconsideration. The government should consider other options like rehabilitating existing jeepneys and using cleaner-burning fuels. One example that can be improved with the government’s help is the rehabilitated jeepney proposed by the Libmanan Transport Service Cooperative (LIBTRASCO). This model includes all government-specified features of the modernized jeepney—such as a side door, a higher ceiling, bigger windows, and even stabilizers to account for the increased height. Compared to e-jeeps, these rehabilitated models only cost around PHP 400 thousand to PHP 500 thousand, making them more affordable for jeepney drivers. Though the rehabilitated jeepney still uses the jeepney’s diesel engine, it can still be adapted to use a Euro 4 engine and even include air conditioning. If the government chooses to work with LIBTRASCO and retrofit the rehabilitated jeepney as an alternative, the Philippines can then improve its transport system while keeping its traditional jeepneys and people’s livelihoods by prioritizing affordability, inclusiveness, and a sustainable future.

Modernization shouldn’t be at the expense of the workers. The primary reason why many are aggressively opposing the program is that the welfare of jeepney drivers was not carefully considered when they should be the center of the solution. For the past years that the modernization program has been implemented, instead of listening to the pleas and concerns of jeepney drivers, commuters, and other constituents, the government has kept imposing the jeepney consolidation and resisting any demands by the public.

Taking all of this into account, we must request the government to prioritize policies that consider the money and power of all citizens, especially those from poor backgrounds. This includes subsidizing the move towards modern vehicles or examining other options that do not oppress marginalized communities. Instead of pushing jeepney drivers to consolidate and buy e-jeeps, the government should consider exploring and supporting initiatives that use cleaner-burning fuels and retrofitting existing jeepneys to meet emission standards to help maintain the environment in its sustainable state without overhauling the iconic jeepney fleet.

Above all else, this transition must be led by the workers—jeepney drivers whom the public has relied on for decades. Development must be made with the public in mind, not without.

// by Kela Alcantara & Xia Mentes

References:

Abarca, C. (2024, March 21). Calabarzon, Metro Manila top classroom shortage list – DepEd. INQUIRER.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1921036/fwd-on-public-classroom-shortage#:~:text=The%20estimated%20total%20number%20of,country’s%20classroom%20shortage%20by%202030

Ansis, JC (December 14, 2015). "Piston: Continuing to fight for the transport sector". CNN Philippines. https://web.archive.org/web/20190131083905/http://cnnphilippines.com/news/2015/12/14/piston-protests-continuing-to-fight-for-transport-sector.html

Bautista, P., Moya, R. (2023, September 3). Jeepney modernization program: Drivers have a steep price to pay. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/09/03/2293549/jeepney-modernization-program-drivers-have-steep-price-pay

CEED Office. (2018, November). Just Transition in the Philippines. CEED. https://ceedphilippines.com/just-transition-in-the-philippines/

Conde, M. (2019, November 16). Transport coop makes pitch for ‘affordable, safe’ rehabilitated jeepney. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/nation/244909-camarines-sur-transport-cooperative-rehabilitated-jeepney/

Dimalanta, R. Atienza, J. Samonte E. (2023). Putting Transport Workers and Commuters First: The Route to Just Transition in Public Transport Modernization. UP CIDS Policy Brief. ISSN 2619-7286.

Gatarin, G. (2024), Modernising the ‘king of the road’: Pathways for just transitions for the Filipino jeepney. Urban Governance. 4(1). 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2023.11.002

Golez, P. (2024, January 24). Marcos extends jeepney consolidation deadline til April 30. POLITIKO. https://politiko.com.ph/2024/01/24/marcos-extends-jeepney-consolidation-deadline-til-april-30/daily-feed/

Latoza, G. (2023, December 15). What are UP’s plans for commuters amid PUVMP? Tinig ng Plaridel. https://www.tinigngplaridel.net/up-transport-puvmp/

Magramo, K. (2024, January 16). Philippines jeepneys: Will the loud, colorful vehicles soon disappear from the roads?. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/01/16/asia/philippines-jeepney-phase-out-strikes-intl-hnk/index.html

Mendoza, T. C. (2021, February). Addressing the “blind side” of the government’s jeepney “modernization” program. University of the Philippines Center for Integrative and Developmental Studies. 1-69. ISSN 2619-7456.

Mondoñedo-Ynot, L. (2024, April 10). April 30 is final deadline for Puv Consolidation. SunStar Publishing Inc. https://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/april-30-is-final-deadline-for-puv-consolidation

Ombay, G. (2023, November 9). DepEd lacks nearly 90,000 teachers - Pia Cayetano. GMA News Online. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/887851/deped-lacks-nearly-90-000-teachers-pia-cayetano/story/

Pabustan, D. (2017, September 21). Euro 4, what does it mean and why do we need it?. AutoDeal.https://www.autodeal.com.ph/articles/car-features/euro-4-what-does-it-mean-and-why-do-we-need-it

Philippine Daily Inquirer. (2024, April 14). DOH’s Lack of Vaccine Urgency. INQUIRER.net. https://opinion.inquirer.net/172935/dohs-lack-of-vaccine-urgency

Presidential Communications Office. (2024, January 24). PBBM approves three-month extension of PUV Consolidation. https://pco.gov.ph/news_releases/pbbm-approves-three-month-extension-of-puv-consolidation/

RAC. (n.d.). Euro 1 to Euro 6 guide – find out your vehicle’s emissions standard. https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/advice/emissions/euro-emissions-standards/

Relativo, J. (2023, December 28). Unconsolidated jeepneys, UV Express “allowed to operate” until Jan. 31, 2024. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/12/28/2321963/unconsolidated-jeepneys-uv-express-allowed-operate-until-jan-31-2024

Relativo, J. (2024, April 30). Unconsolidated jeepneys given “15-day leeway” after consolidation deadline. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2024/04/30/2351543/unconsolidated-jeepneys-given-15-day-leeway-after-consolidation-deadline

Reyes, R. O. (2024, January 29). Jeepney drivers rejoice “partial victory” for phaseout extension. SunStar Publishing Inc. https://www.sunstar.com.ph/tacloban/jeepney-drivers-rejoice-partial-victory-for-phaseout-extension#:~:text=approved%20the%20extension%20for%20franchise

Rivas, R. (2023, March 7). In numbers: Why jeepney phaseout is anti-poor, will do little for environment. RAPPLER. https://www.rappler.com/business/numbers-why-government-phaseout-jeepneys-anti-poor-do-little-environment/

Santos, J. (2024, February 7). Consolidation extension is not what the protest demands. Philippine Collegian.https://phkule.org/article/1106/consolidation-extension-is-not-what-the-protest-demands

[catdotjpeg]

Anakbayan-USA stands with the jeepney drivers as they begin their strike today! We commend the 40,000+ jeepney drivers in Metro Manila and beyond for their unity and strength in waging this historic work stoppage. After 5 long years of struggling to participate in the jeepney phaseout and modernization program, the drivers are taking a huge stand to oppose and expose the phase out’s anti-people roll out.

This program would mandate that individual drivers join a cooperative or corporation that must acquire at least 15 modern public utility vehicles, each costing P2.4-2.6 million or $43,000+ US dollars. Only larger businesses or corporations will be able to afford this requirement, resulting in the disappearance of small business owners and ordinary drivers in the jeepney industry.

In the midst of ruinous inflation on top of the pandemic-caused one year service stoppage, the government is forcing drivers into predatory debt with no subsidies. Many drivers will be pushed to work under larger businesses who will further exploit them. Many drivers will lose their livelihoods, and be thrust into an economy where thousands toil as contractual workers or thousands more leave the country each day in search of employment.

Truly, the only winners of the jeepney modernization plan are the big corporations who already have access to huge amounts of capital, the banks doling out the loans and reaping all of the interest, the foreign car manufacturers producing all of the vehicles, and the capitalists amongst the ranks of the government.

The Philippine government wants to push forward a bogus modernization plan to reap the benefits for themselves. Vice President Sara Duterte blasts the strike for its supposed "hardship on students." But what is the reality?

The strike is only temporary, while the lasting impacts of the jeepney modernization pose the greatest hardships on students: higher fares to pay for these new vehicles, joblessness that this plan forces students and their families into, and a lack of future opportunities.

If the government is not willing to provide a modernization plan that has lasting impacts to secure the livelihoods of the drivers and prioritizes working class people, how can we expect that they will do any different for any other sector?

The people deserve safe, accessible, and quality public transportation. Drivers deserve to have true inclusion in the modernization plan that has lasting impacts and secures their livelihoods.

We call on all youth to stand with the striking drivers!

No to Jeepney Phase Out, Yes to Pro-People Modernization!

TAKE ACTION

- Follow the "No to PUV Phaseout Coalition" on FB - Post a selfie or poster with your support for the protest. Use the hashtags #NoToJeepneyPhaseout #NoToPUVPhaseout #SupportTransportStrike - Donate to BAYAN USA to support the strike

-- “No to Jeepney Phaseout! Yes to Pro-People modernization!”, Anakbayan-USA, 5 March 2023

[pannaginip]

Manila Bulletin News: Toyota makes a P1.1-billion investment pledge on top of its prior commitment of P4.4 billion, totaling to P5.5 billion, to support the PUV Modernization program.

"We have always been appreciative, especially in the involvement of Toyota in the Philippines over so many years, and I think the mutual experience between Toyota and the Philippine and the local markets has been a good one, and the partnership we can look to as a success," Marcos pointed out.

"It is very interesting to hear your new plans for the Philippines, and it's very much in alignment with what we're trying to do... we are hoping we are able to improve the situation for your supplier to be able to come into the ease of doing business," he told the Toyota executives.

2023 Dec. 29

[ennio31]

A Scapegoat Implementation

As we all know, a jeepney driver’s fare for a day is barely enough. Daily earnings are erratic concerning traffic and other factors. This reality contradicts the LTFRB’s daydreamed goals. I find it hard to believe that these poor drivers come up with 1-2 Million pesos to afford a foreign public utility vehicle (PUV) without falling into debt. I see it as very impractical, unrealistic, and far-fetched.

Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) is first established as a means to address problems in transportation and the unstable availability of PUVs. Yes, there are outdated and obsolete jeepneys, but I hardly think eradicating all of these jeepneys is the solution.

What I observed is a lack of a system in the routing system. Jeep stops are erratic, and therefore so will their availability and schedule. The unpredictable transport system is one of the reasons for the programs’ creation. I think the government needs to stop scapegoating the problem on the jeep’s reliability alone, and rather create a trustworthy system of routing to be implemented within jeepney associations. And another popular solution coming up is upgrading the traditional jeepneys with modern and appealing designs, but retaining the traditional and very Filipino image and at a lower cost.

No jeepney driver has to fall into debt and their radical response with a strike is completely understandable, but rather the government on the other hand lacks any reasonable response. I think they need to analyze more rather than blankly implement.

[nash-reports]

Citizen Journalism: Midterms Output | BA Journalism 2A (22-23)

Malolos jeepney barker, drivers detest PUV modernization program

#NoToJeepneyPhaseOut continues to be the unyielding stand of both jeepney barkers and drivers of Malolos Central Transport Terminal after the previous nationwide transport strikes caused by the contentious Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) of the administration.

Beside Xentro Mall Malolos sits the Malolos Central Transport Terminal that holds public utility vehicles (PUVs), particularly traditional jeepneys, with both roundtrip and one-way trips to neighboring and distant places alike, such as Plaridel, Guiguinto, Marilao, and Santa Maria, among others.

Mang Renato, a jeepney barker for 21 years and a father of six, said that he won’t necessarily be affected by the jeepney modernization. But he makes clear that he sympathizes with traditional jeepney drivers, who will not be able to afford the modernized ones.

"Sana hindi na matuloy yung mga phase out na yan, kawawa yung mga operator", he expressed. "Paano kung walang pera yung mga operator… paano yung mga drayber. Syempre kung walang pera, wala silang dyip na modern", he continued.

Although his livelihood will not be directly affected by the modernization, he stressed out: "Wala naman ding pinagkukunan ‘yan [mga drayber], syempre masakit din sa kanila yan." To add to his sentiment, he said that there were kind drivers who were willing to give him extra income whenever their jeepneys would be full of passengers, thereby adding to his disapproval of the government’s plan.

Mang JR, a traditional jeepney driver for two decades, also strongly expressed his disfavor for jeepney modernization: "Syempre nakasanayan na namin itong gamitin, tsaka dito ‘di masyadong ano… kapag binyahe na namin, sa amin na kita. Eh kapag sa modern babayaran mo sa gobyerno."

He further explained that the government is basically phasing out their jeepneys and leaving them in immeasurable debt, which they cannot afford to pay. "Pabigat talaga samin talaga", he said.

"Napag-aral ko yung mga anak ko… yung pang-araw-araw namin hanggang sa bahay, kuryente [at] tubig, dito kami kumukuha", he added, emphasizing the importance of his job for his family to stay afloat.

As for his opinion about why the government is pushing PUV modernization in the country, he thinks they are trying to raise the standard of the Philippines’ public transport on par with Hong Kong’s minibuses, vehicles used to reach places standard buses cannot.

Fiercely pointing out the flaws of the jeepney modernization, "Bunso", also a traditional jeepney driver for almost three decades, said that should the jeepney phaseout be implemented, there will be a great loss to every jeepney driver’s family.

"Maraming epekto, dahil gawa nga ng yung dyip namin imbis na wala kaming utang, magkakautang kami na malaki: milyon. Yung dyip naming pansarili, magkakaroon kami ng amo ngayon", he expressed. 

Among others, what worries him most about such a policy is its effect on the education of their children: "Kahit paano nakakapagpa-aral kami. Ngayon, ‘pag dumating yang modern na yan, baka hindi na kami makapagpa-aral kahit kinder."

He also cannot help but feel bad for fellow drivers who switched to modernized jeepneys because he is certain they are in debt with millions of pesos. "Malaki hulog doon sa modern... tatlong milyon ‘yon", he said.

Asked if he would ever be in favor of the jeepney modernization program, "Kahit kailan, hindi.", he ended.

The sentiments of Mang Renato, Mang JR, and Bunso were only among the many from the transport sector who will be directly affected by the controversial PUV modernization program that most of them believe to be "anti-poor."

The PUVMP was issued way back in 2017 under DOTr Department Order No. 2017-011, also known as the Omnibus Guidelines on the Planning and Identification of Public Road Transportation Services and Franchise Issuance, during the Duterte administration. Its importance was restated by Transportation Secretary Jamie Bautista under the Marcos administration, with the same aim to provide the Filipinos with a safe and environmentally sustainable transportation system despite the expensive transition that would leave most jeepney drivers behind. | via Andrea Apit, Caryl Flores, Athena Morales, & Nash Villena, BA Journalism 2A

#NOTOJEEPNEYPHASEOUT: Short Documentary #NOTOJEEPNEYPHASEOUT: Short Documentary #NOTOJEEPNEYPHASEOUT: Short Documentary

[techno2025]

Modelo ng modern jeep na hawig sa traditional PUJ ang disenyo, pumapasad...

Modern jeepney.

Iconic jeepney on steroids.

[elpebrispace]

Unlocking the Potential of Organic Waste: A Pathway to Sustainable Utilization

As the global entrepreneurial University population continues to grow and urbanization accelerates, the issue of waste management has become increasingly pressing. Organic waste, which comprises a significant portion of municipal solid waste, poses a unique challenge but also presents considerable opportunities for sustainability. The effective utilization of organic waste not only addresses environmental concerns but also contributes to resource conservation, energy production, and economic development. This analysis explores the future of organic waste utilization, highlighting the trends, challenges, and innovative strategies that can transform waste into valuable resources.

Current Landscape of Organic Waste

Organic waste includes biodegradable materials derived from plants and animals, such as food scraps, yard waste, and agricultural residues. Globally, it is estimated that approximately 1.3 billion tons of food is wasted each year, contributing significantly to Telkom University greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation. When organic waste ends up in landfills, it decomposes anaerobically, releasing methane—a potent greenhouse gas that is 25 times more effective at trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide.

However, when managed properly, organic waste can be harnessed as a resource. Composting, anaerobic digestion, and other waste-to-energy technologies are gaining traction as viable methods for converting organic waste into valuable products, such as compost, biogas, and biofuels. By adopting a circular economy approach, which emphasizes reducing waste and reusing resources, communities can effectively turn organic waste into an asset rather than a liability.

Key Drivers of Organic Waste Utilization

The future of organic waste utilization will be influenced by several key drivers, including technological advancements, regulatory frameworks, market dynamics, and public awareness.

Technological Advancements: Innovations in waste processing technologies are at the forefront of transforming organic waste into useful products. Anaerobic digestion, for example, is a process that breaks down organic matter in the absence of oxygen, producing biogas that can be used for heating, electricity generation, or as a vehicle fuel. Modern anaerobic digesters are becoming more efficient, allowing for the processing of a wider range of organic materials and improving overall energy yields.

Composting technology has also evolved, with advanced composting systems utilizing aerobic microorganisms to decompose organic waste rapidly. Innovations such as in-vessel composting and aerated static pile composting allow for more efficient and controlled composting processes, resulting in high-quality compost products.

Emerging technologies like pyrolysis and gasification are also being explored as methods for converting organic waste into biochar and synthetic fuels. These processes not only reduce waste volume but also create valuable byproducts that can enhance soil health and contribute to carbon sequestration efforts.

Regulatory Frameworks: Government policies and regulations will continue to play a crucial role in promoting organic waste utilization. Many countries are implementing waste management policies that prioritize waste reduction and resource recovery. For instance, several regions have introduced mandatory organic waste recycling programs, requiring businesses and households to separate organic waste from general waste streams.

In addition, incentives such as grants, tax credits, and subsidies for composting and anaerobic digestion facilities can help encourage investment in organic waste utilization technologies. Regulatory frameworks that support the development of infrastructure for organic waste processing will be essential to scaling up these initiatives.

Market Dynamics: The market for organic waste utilization is expanding, driven by the demand for sustainable products and practices. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, there is a growing preference for products made from recycled or sustainable materials. The market for compost, for example, is experiencing increased demand as more gardeners and landscapers recognize the benefits of using organic fertilizers.

Furthermore, the rise of the bioeconomy—an economic system that relies on biological resources—provides significant opportunities for the utilization of organic waste. Industries such as agriculture, food processing, and energy production are increasingly seeking sustainable solutions that incorporate organic waste as a feedstock for their operations.

Public Awareness and Engagement: Public awareness and community engagement are essential components of successful organic waste utilization initiatives. Education and outreach programs can help inform the public about the benefits of composting, recycling, and reducing food waste. Encouraging community participation in local composting programs and waste separation initiatives fosters a culture of sustainability and responsibility.

Additionally, involving local stakeholders, including businesses, farmers, and community organizations, in the development and implementation of organic waste utilization strategies can enhance their effectiveness. Collaborative efforts can help identify local needs, resources, and challenges, ultimately leading to more successful waste management solutions.

Challenges to Organic Waste Utilization

Despite the promising outlook for organic waste utilization, several challenges must be addressed to fully realize its potential.

Infrastructure Development: The lack of adequate infrastructure for organic waste collection, processing, and distribution remains a significant barrier to effective utilization. Many communities, especially in developing countries, lack the necessary facilities to process organic waste efficiently. Investment in infrastructure development is essential to enable the widespread adoption of organic waste utilization technologies.

Economic Viability: The economic viability of organic waste utilization projects can be a challenge, particularly in regions with low organic waste generation rates. The costs associated with establishing and operating processing facilities may deter investment. Developing innovative financing mechanisms, such as public-private partnerships and community-based funding models, can help overcome these economic barriers.

Contamination and Quality Control: Ensuring the quality of organic waste feedstock is critical for successful processing and product outcomes. Contamination with non-biodegradable materials can hinder composting and anaerobic digestion processes, resulting in lower-quality products. Implementing effective waste separation practices and educating the public on proper disposal methods are essential for maintaining the integrity of organic waste streams.

Regulatory Hurdles: While supportive regulations can drive organic waste utilization, overly restrictive policies can hinder innovation and investment. Navigating complex regulatory environments can pose challenges for businesses and municipalities seeking to implement organic waste management solutions. Streamlining permitting processes and reducing bureaucratic obstacles will be essential for fostering growth in this sector.

Opportunities for the Future

The future of organic waste utilization presents numerous opportunities for innovation, sustainability, and economic development.

Circular Economy: Embracing a circular economy approach can fundamentally change how society views organic waste. By prioritizing waste reduction, reuse, and recycling, communities can minimize waste generation and maximize resource recovery. Organic waste utilization can play a central role in this transition, creating a closed-loop system where waste is transformed into valuable resources that benefit the economy and the environment.

Climate Change Mitigation: Organic waste utilization is a powerful tool in the fight against climate change. By diverting organic waste from landfills, we can significantly reduce methane emissions and lower the overall carbon footprint of waste management. Additionally, the production of compost and biochar can enhance soil health, improve carbon sequestration, and support sustainable agriculture.

Rural Development and Job Creation: Investing in organic waste utilization projects can stimulate economic development in rural areas, where agriculture and waste management are often closely linked. By creating jobs in waste collection, processing, and product distribution, communities can boost local economies while promoting sustainable practices.

Conclusion: Toward a Sustainable Future

The future of organic waste utilization is full of promise, driven by technological innovation, supportive policies, and increasing public awareness. By harnessing organic waste as a valuable resource, communities can address pressing environmental challenges while promoting sustainability and economic development. The path forward will require collaboration among stakeholders, investment in infrastructure, and a commitment to embracing the principles of a circular economy. In doing so, we can transform organic waste from a burden into an opportunity, paving the way for a more sustainable and resilient future.

[upismediacenter]

PARA PO! PARA SA BAYAN!

LABANAN ANG KLASISTANG PAMAMALAKAD, TUMINDIG KASAMA ANG MENORIDAD!

LABAN NG TSUPER, LABAN NG KOMYUTER!

Labing-apat na araw. Simula ika-1 ng Enero, 2024, hindi na papayagan ng pamahalaan na pumasada ang mga dyip na hindi modernisado. Sa loob ng labing-apat na araw, ang kasalukuyang pamasahe na Php 12 ay lolobo hanggang Php 40-50 upang tustusan ang gastos ng tsuper sa tinatayang 2.8 Milyon hanggang 5 Milyong halaga ng modernong dyip. Sa loob ng labing-apat na araw, tinatantiyang 64,000 na drayber at 25,000 na operator ang sasalubong sa bagong taon nang walang trabaho.

Ang pamimilit ng pamahalaan na isakatuparan ng mga maliliit na tsuper at operator ang Public Utility Vehicle Modernization Program (PUVMP) ay tanda ng klasismo. Saan kukuha ng dalawang milyon si Manong Drayber na nagkakandakuba na para maabot ang kaniyang boundary, upang i-modernisa ang kaniyang dyip? Anong silbi ng ipinangakong subsidiya ng gobyerno na makatutulong daw sa mga drayber kung anim hanggang walong porsyento (6-8%) lang naman ang maiaambag sa kabuuang gastos para sa modernong unit? Ang kasalukuyang kalagayan ng sistemang pantransportasyon ng Pilipinas ay higit nang masalimuot—pagpatak ng alas sais ay hindi na uusad ang trapik; ang dating isang oras na biyahe ay inaabot na ng dalawa. Paano pa kung mababawasan ang mga pampublikong sasakyan? Hindi dapat tayo sa mga tsuper na naghahanap-buhay magalit, kundi sa administrasyong hindi makatao, hindi makamasa, at lalong hindi makabayan. 

Kasabay ng mga malawakang protesta, tumitindig ang UPIS Media Center kasama ang lahat ng mga tsuper, operator, komyuter, at mamamayan na ipinaglalaban ang karapatang panatilihin ang pamamasada ng mga tradisyunal na dyipni. Ang kasalukuyang programa ay hindi makamasa’t karapat-dapat ibasura sapagkat kung tunay na para sa ikabubuti ng bansa ang intensyon nito, hindi nito yuyurakan ang hanapbuhay ng mga mamamayang pumapasan ng bayan.

PARA PO! PARA SA BAYAN!

Basahin ang Opinion Article na ito: https://www.tumblr.com/upismediacenter/701755924495400960/opinion-bayad-po-malayo-bang-masolusyonan-ang?source=share

[pannaginip]

Inquirer.net: Various groups come out in opposition of the PUV Modernization program.

"Importing surplus minibuses that break down easily, in the context of worsening climate change impacts like flooding, and essentially wasting thousands of PUV units when they can be rehabilitated, can hardly be called sustainable,” [Kalikasan People’s Network for the Environment] National Coordinator Jon Bonifacio told INQUIRER.net.

"The DOTr and the Marcos Jr. administration can throw around all the pro-environment language they want, but the PUVMP, at its core, violates the principles of a just transition,” he explained.

"In transitioning towards a more sustainable and genuinely eco-friendly future, the processes involved should be fair, equitable, and just,” [Youth Advocates for Climate Action Philippines] said in Filipino in a post on social media.

“A project or a policy cannot be considered environmentally friendly if it is not pro-people,” the group insisted.

"We clarify that we are not against the modernization of public transportation as long as it is based on the capability and capacity of the operator, not for privatization,” [Pamalakaya] said.

2023 Dec. 30

[dorleco]

EV Charging Management Software

October 15, 2024

by dorleco

with no comment

eMOBILITY CONTROLS

Edit

Introduction

Electric vehicles (EVs) are becoming a major player in the global transportation ecosystem as the world moves toward sustainable energy solutions. Charging is an essential part of owning and using an electric vehicle. While EVs are efficient and convenient, managing the charging infrastructure becomes more difficult as they become more widely used. Software for managing EV charging can be useful in this situation. This technology is intended to improve overall satisfaction for EV owners and charging network operators by optimizing the charging process and energy use. We’ll go into much more detail in this blog about EV charging management software, including its meaning, functions, and potential applications.

What Is EV Charging Management Software?

A platform called EV Charging Management Software keeps track of on, regulates, and enhances the performance of electric car chargers. It makes it possible for network administrators, fleet managers, and owners of charging stations to effectively manage several charging stations, ensuring maximum uptime, energy efficiency, and improved user experiences. Charging management software provides an all-inclusive solution to handle every aspect of modern EV charging, regardless of the kind of charging infrastructure — public charging stations, residential apartments, or corporate EV fleets. With cutting-edge functions like dynamic load balancing, real-time monitoring, user authentication, and reporting, the software offers substantial benefits to all parties involved in the EV charging chain.

Why Is Software for EV Charging Management Important?

The following issues can be used to understand the significance of charging management software:

1. Monitoring and Control:

Real-time monitoring of charging stations is made possible by EV charging management software, which enables operators to keep tabs on the health, efficiency, and energy use of each station. This helps the network’s seamless operation, enabling quick issue response and effective station management.

2. User Management:

The program makes it easier to maintain user accounts and allows users to be divided into different groups, such as VIPs, clients, and workers. Users will enjoy a seamless experience as a result of personalized service, optimized billing methods, payment plans, and access capabilities that are specific to each group.

3. Load management:

By allocating energy optimally, the software avoids grid overloads and lowers energy expenses. By dividing the load among several charging stations, improves grid stability and helps prevent peak demand fees.

4. Payment Management:

This function handles billing and transactions at public charging stations. It accepts credit cards, mobile payments, and subscription payments, among other payment options. It guarantees consumers quick and simple payments, improving their entire billing experience. Remarkably, in a recent UK survey, 47% of electric vehicle drivers said they would be willing to pay a little bit extra for a simpler payment procedure.

5. Analytics and Reporting:

The platform offers comprehensive reporting on performance, financial parameters, and station utilization. These insights support operators in decision-making, enhance the caliber of their services, and identify areas where they can save costs and increase income. Charge point operators (CPOs) and fleet managers can benefit from an all-encompassing solution provided by EV charging management software that integrates these crucial aspects, allowing for the effective administration of charging stations, happy customers, and sustainable growth.

Key Features of EV Charger Management Software

It’s critical to understand the benefits that each feature provides and why they are important for efficient operations while evaluating EV charger management software.

1. Scalability:

The scalability of the software is important because it lets operators handle more charging stations as their network grows. As EV usage rises, the platform must be able to accommodate future growth without requiring regular changes. This ensures just that. Another important feature is multi-location capability, which makes it possible to control stations in different parts of the world from a single, centralized platform. For operators managing large networks, this minimizes administrative effort while preserving constant service quality.

2. User-friendly interface:

Both users and administrators need to be able to easily get around the interface. A user-friendly dashboard reduces training time and operational errors by simplifying management and navigation. The main functions of the software may be accessed and used with ease thanks to an intuitive interface, which raises user satisfaction and encourages more frequent use. Users can find, book, and pay for charging sessions while they’re on the road thanks to integration with mobile apps, which further increases convenience. In today’s mobile-focused world, user engagement and happiness are greatly increased by this accessibility and usefulness.

3. Advanced analytics:

The efficacy of EV charging management software depends on advanced analytics. Fast decision-making and problem-solving are made possible by real-time data, which provides up-to-date information on charging sessions, station utilization, energy consumption, and income creation. These observations are essential to guaranteeing the charging network’s dependability and effectiveness.

4. Predictive maintenance:

Predictive maintenance reduces downtime and prolongs the life of charging equipment by forecasting and proactively solving maintenance needs. By avoiding unexpected malfunctions and costly repairs, this strategy helps to maximize charging station uptime. The proper software may significantly reduce the number of public charging session failures, which are related to station malfunctions and outages in over 71% of cases. Furthermore, information on usage and charging sessions supports CPOs in effectively expanding their charging networks and assists with fleet electrification planning.

5. White labeling:

White labeling enables operators to customize the software with their brandings, such as logos and color schemes. This customization boosts brand recognition and fosters customer loyalty by delivering a unique, personalized user experience. A branded interface helps operators distinguish their services from competitors and cultivate a loyal customer base. White labeling also ensures alignment with the operator’s existing offerings, reinforcing trust and reliability. This tailored approach enhances marketability and improves user satisfaction, ultimately supporting long-term business growth.

Charger interoperability:

When selecting EV charging management software, charger interoperability is crucial. For the software to continue to function with a variety of charger types and retain operational flexibility and efficiency, it must work effortlessly. The industry-standard protocol that ensures compatibility between management systems and charging stations is called Open Charge Point Protocol, or OCPP. The software’s ability to interact with various charger models and support OCPP facilitates network expansion and the integration of new technologies. By ensuring that the charging infrastructure can adjust to a variety of devices, this degree of interoperability reduces compatibility problems and provides a more adaptable and long-lasting solution.

The Role of EV Charging Management Software in Fleet Management

Another domain in which EV charging management software is essential is fleet management. Businesses that run sizable fleets of electric cars must make sure that all of their cars are charged and operational to avoid downtime or inefficiency. How the software aids in EV fleet management is as follows:

1. Enhanced Planning for Charging

The timing of charging has a big financial influence on fleets. With the use of charging management software, schedules can be optimized to charge cars at cheaper electricity prices during off-peak hours. Additionally, depending on the demand for anticipated travel, the system can prioritize which vehicles need to be charged first.

2. Energy Cost Management

One of the biggest costs for fleet operators is electricity. With the use of the software’s comprehensive data on energy usage, managers may spot trends and modify their charging schedules accordingly. Integrating renewable energy sources, such as wind or solar power, can also assist in reducing expenses and raising sustainability indicators.

3. Tracking Vehicle Status

A fleet manager needs to know which cars are charged and prepared. The fleet can always remain operational by using charging management software, which can offer real-time data on each vehicle’s condition. This minimizes downtime while maximizing companies’ use of EVs.

Conclusion:

EV charging management software is an essential component of the electric vehicle ecosystem, providing a comprehensive solution for managing the complexities of charging infrastructure, whether for individual users, public networks, or large fleets. As the EV market continues to expand, this software will play an increasingly critical role in optimizing energy usage, enhancing user experiences, and ensuring the scalability of charging networks. For businesses, municipalities, and fleet operators aiming to stay ahead in the rapidly evolving EV landscape, investing in robust charging management software is no longer optional — it is a strategic necessity. At Dorleco, we offer fast-charging software solutions along with a range of EV products, including Vehicle Control Units (VCUs), CAN Displays, and CAN Keypads. Additionally, we provide specialized EV software services to meet the demands of the growing electric vehicle market.

[bulokpipe]

The Essential Guide to SS 304 Clamps in Modern Piping Systems

In the evolving global of business programs, piping structures play a crucial function across diverse sectors like advent, production, petrochemicals, and greater. At the heart of these structures, sure small but pivotal components make sure stability and stable connections, permitting smooth operations. Among those components, SS 304 clamps have won prominence for his or her sturdiness, reliability, and resistance to corrosion.

This manual explores the importance of 304 stainless steel clamps in contemporary piping systems, their applications, advantages, and why they're the popular desire for many industries.

Introduction to SS 304 Clamps

SS 304 clamps are fastening gadgets crafted from 304-grade stainless steel, it's widely identified for its high-quality combination of electricity, resistance to corrosion, and affordability. These clamps are designed to keep regular pipes, tubes, and hoses in place, making sure the stability of the entire piping form. Given the high call for the clamps in extraordinary sectors, statistics, their tendencies and blessings is crucial for professionals in the agency.

Understanding 304 Stainless Steel

Before delving deeper into SS 304 clamps, it’s essential to understand the houses of 304 stainless-steel itself. This austenitic steel alloy is normally composed of iron, chromium (18%), and nickel (8%), which collectively provide its excessive corrosion resistance and mechanical electricity. 304 stainless steel is one of the maximum versatile and broadly used grades, offering a remarkable balance among affordability and performance.

Industries which include meals processing, chemical, marine, and pharmaceuticals carefully depend on 304 stainless-steel components because of their non-reactive residences, ease of cleaning, and lengthy-time period sturdiness. As a result, 304 stainless-steel clamps are regularly desired in environments in which publicity to moisture, chemical compounds, or varying temperatures is commonplace.

Types of SS 304 Clamps

The versatility of SS 304 clamps has brought about the development of numerous kinds to wholesome fantastic packages. Here are a few commonplace variations:

Hose Clamps: These are broadly used to strong hoses onto fittings like barbs or nipples. 304 stainless steel clamps are especially preferred in industries in which publicity to corrosive materials is common.

Pipe Clamps: These clamps are used to solid piping structures, stopping pointless movement and ensuring the device stays intact under strain. The corrosion resistance of 304 stainless steel guarantees sturdiness, even in harsh environments.

U-Bolt Clamps: Often utilized in heavy-responsibility programs, U-bolt clamps are designed to secure pipes, tubing, and other cylindrical gadgets. The use of SS 304 clamps in those configurations guarantees both balance and resistance to environmental factors.

Strut Clamps: These are designed for containing pipes onto strut channels in building infrastructure and manufacturing. Their potential to resist varying load pressures makes 304 stainless-steel clamps ideal for the undertaking.

V-Band Clamps: Common in vehicle and exhaust structures, V-band clamps are used to join piping or tubing connections securely. The advanced sealing functionality of 304 stainless steel lets in these clamps to be dependable in excessive-overall performance settings.

Applications of 304 Stainless Steel Clamps

The versatility and robustness of SS 304 clamps allow them for use for the duration of a big style of industries:

1. Construction and Infrastructure

In present day production initiatives, 304 stainless steel clamps are important components that ensure the integrity of plumbing and HVAC systems. Their potential to face up to rust and keep structural stability makes them essential in excessive-moisture environments like basements and rooftop installations.

2. Automotive and Aerospace

The automobile and aerospace sectors require components that would withstand excessive pressures, vibrations, and immoderate temperatures. SS 304 clamps are substantially applied in exhaust structures, fuel lines, and hydraulic systems because of their energy and resistance to environmental elements.

3. Marine and Offshore

Marine environments are infamous for their corrosive nature because of everyday exposure to saltwater. The tremendous corrosion resistance of 304 stainless-steel makes 304 stainless steel clamps a preferred desire in shipbuilding, offshore systems, and exceptional marine applications.

4. Food and Beverage Industry

In industries wherein hygiene is paramount, such as food and beverage production, 304 stainless steel clamps ensure that pipelines and hoses continue to be securely in location without the threat of contamination. The non-reactive nature of 304 stainless-steel guarantees that the first-rate of meals merchandise remains uncompromised.

5. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries

These sectors require additives which can resist exposure to competitive chemicals and varying temperatures. SS 304 clamps offer the right balance of chemical resistance and mechanical energy, making them suitable for vital packages in chemical processing and pharmaceutical manufacturing.

6. Oil and Gas Industry

In the oil and fuel quarter, pipelines want to resist harsh environmental situations, along with immoderate pressures and corrosive substances. 304 stainless-steel clamps are commonly used to stable pipes and fittings, ensuring the protection and integrity of the machine.

Advantages of Using SS 304 Clamps

The big adoption of 304 stainless-steel clamps may be attributed to the numerous blessings they provide:

Corrosion Resistance: The chromium content material in 304 stainless steel bureaucracy is a defensive oxide layer that prevents rust, making those clamps pleasant to be used in moisture-wealthy or chemically harsh environments.

Durability: SS 304 clamps are mentioned for his or her long provider existence. They are proof in opposition to put on, impact, and pressure, ensuring reliability in important applications.

Cost-Effectiveness: While there are extra specialized stainless steel grades to be had, the balance between price and performance supplied by way of the use of 304 stainless-steel makes it a well-known preference for a large variety of industries.

Versatility: The adaptability of 304 stainless steel clamps at some point of diverse applications—from production to marine use—demonstrates their fee in several industries.

Ease of Maintenance: 304 stainless steel is straightforward to clean and does no longer require commonplace preservation, that is mainly useful in hygienic environments like meals processing plants.

Aesthetic Appeal: For seen installations, 304 stainless steel clamps offer a smooth and polished appearance that enhances the general appearance of the system.

Why Choose SS 304 Clamps Over Other Materials?

With more than one option available for clamps, selecting the right cloth is important. SS 304 clamps stand out for several reasons:

1. Comparison with Carbon Steel

While carbon steel clamps are more cheap, they lack the corrosion resistance furnished with the useful resource of 304 stainless steel clamps. In environments where moisture and chemical substances are a gift, carbon metallic clamps are prone to rusting, mainly to ability system failures.

2. Comparison with Aluminum

Aluminum clamps are mild-weight and corrosion-resistant, but they no longer wholesome the electricity and sturdiness of SS 304 clamps. In immoderate-stress programs or in which the clamps are uncovered to dynamic loads, 304 stainless steel presents higher overall performance.

3. Comparison with Other Stainless Steel Grades

While better-grade stainless steels like 316 offer greater corrosion resistance, they arrive at a better price. For most packages, the extent of corrosion resistance furnished thru SS 304 clamps is extra than sufficient, making them the most maximum within your means preference.

Selecting the Right SS 304 Clamps for Your Needs

When selecting 304 stainless steel clamps, it’s important to keep in mind numerous factors to make sure they meet the precise necessities of your utility:

Load Capacity: Consider the burden and pressure that the clamp desires to deal with. Ensure the clamp you select is rated for the meant load.

Environmental Conditions: Assess the surroundings in which the clamp can be used. If it’s uncovered to competitive chemical substances, humidity, or saltwater, SS 304 clamps are a dependable choice.

Size and Fit: Clamps are available in numerous sizes to cope with incredible pipe diameters. Accurate measurement is critical to make certain a strong shape.

Maintenance and Longevity of SS 304 Clamps

Proper renovation ensures the prolonged-time period overall performance of SS 304 clamps. Even although the ones clamps are low-renovation, a few key practices can assist extend their lifespan:

Regular Inspections: Periodically take a look at the clamps for any signs and symptoms and signs and symptoms of harm, corrosion, or loosening. Early detection of troubles can save you machine screw ups.

Cleaning: In environments with capacity for infection or buildup, it’s essential to ease the clamps periodically. Using slight detergents and water can help maintain their polished look and save you corrosion.

Tightening: Over time, vibrations and dynamic loads can motivate clamps to loosen. Regularly checking and retightening them guarantees the integrity of the piping system.

Replacement of Damaged Clamps: While SS 304 clamps are long lasting, any signs and symptoms of cracking or intense corrosion need to set off right now as an alternative to maintain machine protection.

Conclusion

In contemporary piping systems, SS 304 clamps have been confirmed to be vital. Their aggregate of corrosion resistance, energy, and value-effectiveness makes them a favored choice throughout a large variety of industries. Whether it’s securing pipelines in creation, ensuring the integrity of marine structures, or supporting hygienic food processing strains, 304 stainless steel clamps supply dependable overall performance and durability.

For companies searching out great and sturdiness, selecting the right producer is vital. Bu-Lok is one of the essential and most great manufacturers, investors, and providers of stainless steel, immoderate nickel metal, alloy steel, and carbon steel merchandise in various office work which includes pipe, fittings, flanges, fasteners, plates, and spherical bars. If you are searching out pinnacle-tier SS 304 clamps, Bu-Lok offers products that meet the great industry necessities, making sure your structures run smoothly and efficiently. Contact Bu-Lok for more statistics on how they're able to fulfill your commercial wishes.

[ohioelectricityrates]

PUCO Holding Public Hearings for Duke Energy Rate Hike

New Post has been published on https://www.ohenergyratings.com/blog/puco-holding-public-hearings-for-duke-energy-rate-hike/

PUCO Holding Public Hearings for Duke Energy Rate Hike

Duke Energy Rates To Increase

Duke Energy has proposed an ESP plan that will raise all Cincinnati electricity customers rates by $135. Learn how you can participate in the PUCO hearing and how to save on your bills!

It’s time to hop back on the rate increase train. Duke Energy Ohio filed an application for an energy security plan back in April. This makes them the forth company this year seeking to hike electricity rates. This energy security plan does two things. It sets the standard service offer pricing process and adds new riders to cover Duke‘s distribution costs. The problem is that this plan will likely raise your Ohio energy bills by $135 per year. If not you’re not happy with this, then you’ll have an opportunity to tell them.

Public Hearings Take Place Soon

Since this is such a large increase, PUCO is holding public hearings in the Duke service area. The first is September 4 at 6 pm, at the MidPointe Library in Middletown, OH. The second is located at Cincinnati City Hall at 6 pm on September 10i. Five PUCO commissioners will be there to listen to your views on this increase. You can also file a public comment, or send a letter directly to the PUCO board:

Public Utilities Commission of Ohio 180 E. Broad St., 11th Floor Columbus, OH 43215

Is a Rate Hike a Burden On Customers?

According to the Ohio Consumer’s Counsel, Duke Energy‘s ESP plan raises the distribution rates for all residential customers. While bills rise a mere 1.7% the first year, they increase by another 6.19% to 7.87% in three years. For a typical residential consumer, they would have to pay an additional $11.27 per month.

All these hikes come about through the addition of new distribution fees and other riders. For example, the new Infrastructure Modernization Rider. This lets Duke Energy collect costs for two electric vehicle programs from all of its customers. And there’s no exception if they own an EV or not. Also, Duke Energy includes charges for energy efficiency programs. Even though we like them, some Ohio consumers do not want to pay for them. So, Ohio no longer has a law the requires such programs nor their funding.

Find A Cheaper Electricity Rate

It’s important for Duke Energy consumers to speak their minds at forums like the ones PUCO is holding. After all, Cincinnati area energy customers already saw a $23 million rate increase start in 2024. Plus, PUCO will consider public comments during in their approval hearings.

No one who watches the the energy industry disagrees that Ohio’s local grids need upgrading and expanding. However, as the OCC points out in its Duke Energy factsheet, Ohio utility ESP’s “have become a common tool for Ohio’s electric companies to collect more money from consumers outside of a standard distribution rate case.”

Another Rate Hike Coming?

With more people needing Ohio electricity, the quick answer is “probably”. That means everyday consumers need to find ways to cut their monthly electric bills. So, it’s important to shop low rates now and lower your monthly bills. The best way to do that is to lock in a low rate that beats Duke Energy’s price to compare. Also be sure to watch for ways to cut high electricity bills. You can find more information on saving on your electricity and other rate increases at www.ohenergyratings.com