#propalestineprotesters

[girlactionfigure]

australians_for_israel

As we all knew... Genocide my a** @israelwarroom

[phonemantra-blog]

The recent escalation of violence during a pro-Palestine protest outside a Los Angeles synagogue has drawn widespread condemnation, including from President Joe Biden. The incident, which occurred outside the Adas Torah synagogue, underscores the growing tensions surrounding the Israel-Gaza conflict and highlights the broader implications of such confrontations in the United States. President Biden Condemns The Incident: A Clash in Pico-Robertson A Violent Confrontation On a seemingly ordinary Sunday morning, the peaceful neighborhood of Pico-Robertson was thrust into chaos as a protest turned violent outside the Adas Torah synagogue. Around 150 pro-Palestine demonstrators gathered to protest a real estate event hosted by My Home in Israel, a company promoting housing projects in Israel’s Anglo neighborhoods. The Escalation What began as a protest quickly escalated into violence. Videos and eyewitness accounts revealed punches being thrown, protesters wrestling on the ground, and bear spray being used against multiple individuals. The situation necessitated the deployment of approximately 60 police officers to restore order and ensure the safety of the synagogue attendees and the surrounding community. Arrests and Police Response The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) reported that one individual was arrested for possessing a spiked post. Additionally, two reports of the battery were filed, and the LAPD has pledged to investigate these incidents further. In response to the unrest, the LAPD announced increased patrols around sensitive religious sites to prevent further violence. Reactions from Leaders President Biden's Condemnation President Joe Biden condemned the violence, expressing his dismay at the events that transpired. "I’m appalled by the scenes outside of Adas Torah synagogue in Los Angeles," Biden stated on X.com. He emphasized that while peaceful protest is a fundamental right, violence and intimidation, especially targeting places of worship, are unacceptable and un-American. California Governor and Los Angeles Mayor Speak Out California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass also condemned the violent clashes. Newsom called the events "appalling" and stressed that antisemitic hatred has no place in California. Mayor Bass echoed these sentiments, stating, "Today’s violence in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood was abhorrent, and blocking access to a place of worship is unacceptable." Enhanced Security Measures In the wake of the violence, Mayor Bass has called for increased LAPD patrols in the Pico-Robertson area and around other houses of worship throughout Los Angeles. She assured the community that those responsible for the violence would be held accountable and highlighted ongoing efforts to foster dialogue and unity among diverse community leaders. The Broader Context Tensions Over the Israel-Gaza Conflict The protest outside the Adas Torah synagogue is a microcosm of the broader tensions and conflicts related to the Israel-Gaza situation. The demonstrators aimed to disrupt a real estate event they believed was promoting the sale of Palestinian land. This incident highlights the passionate and often contentious debates surrounding this long-standing geopolitical conflict. The Role of Community and Law Enforcement The involvement of law enforcement in maintaining order during such protests is crucial. The LAPD's swift response helped prevent further escalation and ensured that the rights and safety of all parties were protected. The incident also underscores the need for continuous dialogue and cooperation between community leaders and law enforcement to address and mitigate the root causes of such conflicts. Moving Forward: Community and Legal Responses Community Meetings and Future Actions In the aftermath of the violence, community leaders, including Rabbi Noah Farkas of the Jewish Federation Los Angeles and Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky, are set to meet with law enforcement officials and other faith leaders. These meetings aim to discuss steps to ensure the safety and security of all communities in Los Angeles. Legal and Policy Implications The events at the Adas Torah synagogue may prompt reviews of existing policies regarding protests and public safety, especially about sensitive sites such as places of worship. Lawmakers and community leaders may explore additional measures to prevent similar incidents in the future while balancing the rights to free speech and peaceful protest.

[thereporter360]

Israel Supporters Assault, Spit, Wish Rape On Protestors

Violence by Zionist forces during students Pro-Palestine protests. Will the Zionists destroy America, do comment.

#Gaza #ProPalestineProtests #StudentProtests #RafahUnderAttack‌

[girlactionfigure]

australians_for_israel

"To do the same horrible act over and over expecting different results and then playing the victim when it backfires"

[girlactionfigure]

Hard to believe that we actually need to say this...  We stand with Israel and the IDF 🇮🇱 🇭🇲

australians_for_israel

[girlactionfigure]

@abbasez

ISRAEL IS NOT A RACIST STATE: Unlike Gaza, every Israeli citizen has equal rights regardless of race, religion or gender or sexual orientation (so you won't get tossed off a roof)

THERE IS NO APARTHEID: Unlike citizens of Gaza, Israelis of all races can live anywhere, marry anyone, run for office, vote, assemble freely, pursue any occupation and worship freely.

JEWS ARE NOT WHITE: Over 62% of Israeli citizens are of Mizrahi, Arab, Ethiopian, North African or Mixed descent. 

JEWS ARE NOT COLONIZERS: Genetic, historical, religious and archaeological evidence prove that Israel is the ancestral home of the Jewish people – making our return to the land the ultimate act of “decolonization.”

JEWS DIDN’T STEAL THE LAND: In ‘48, the UN Partition divided the land into two states: one for Jews and one for Arabs. Israel accepted the plan. The Arab states didn’t and declared war.

ISRAEL DIDN’T START THE WAR: There was a ceasefire on Oct 6th when Hamas murdered, mutilated, raped and kidnapped over 1,500 Israelis. Simply put, Hamas will not stop until Israel no longer exists.

THERE IS NO GENOCIDE: “Israel has implemented more precautions to prevent civilian harm than any military in history – above and beyond what international law requires, and more than the U.S. did in its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.” - John Spencer, Chair of Urban Warfare Studies at West Point (See article in bio)

THERE IS NO FAMINE: Columbia Professors Awi Federgruen & Ran Kivetz have analyzed available data and conducted research, noting that “the food supply entering Gaza is more than sufficient to feed all 2.2 million Gazans according to what is considered a normal diet in North America. They further argue that the International Criminal Court and UN have joined Hamas in blaming Israel for a “famine that never was, hoping to stop the war in Gaza.” 

[girlactionfigure]

[girlactionfigure]

shmads.y

Calling for a violent uprising that murders Jews outside of an exhibit that honors the lives of murdered Jews is nothing more than a hate rally. Call it by its name.

[girlactionfigure]

australians_for_israel

This!!!! At least the should be consistent with their lies 🙄

[girlactionfigure]

intifada washing

WHITEWASH (verb)

deliberately attempt to conceal unpleasant or incriminating facts about (someone or something). (Oxford Dictionary)

DOGWHISTLE (noun)

an expression or statement that has a secondary meaning intended to be understood only by a particular group of people. (Merriam-Webster Dictionary)

PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY 

anything illegal or unethical that can be explained away under an innocent and probable guise [whether] true or otherwise. (Law Dictionary)

These calls for an intifada are not metaphorical. This is an explicit call to violence. The red upside down triangle emoji is what Hamas uses in livestreams before they hit their (human) target. 

WHAT WERE THE INTIFADAS?

The word intifada comes from an Arabic word meaning “to shake off,” but it’s a term used for violent uprisings or rebellions. It was first used in the 1950s to describe the Iraqi Intifada, a series of violent protests to overthrow the Hashemite dynasty. 

In the Israeli-Palestinian context, there have been two intifadas, which were campaigns of bombings, suicide bombings, stabbings, car-ramming, lynchings, and stone-throwing, primarily directed at civilians. It’s worth noting that the stones in question here weren’t small pebbles, but rather, large stones that killed people. 

Some apologists claim that an intifada doesn’t necessarily describe a violent campaign because the word simply comes from the term for “shake off.” But this is a completely disingenuous argument, like claiming “Mein Kampf” simply means “my struggle” or “sieg hiel” simply means “hail victory.” 

Objectively, the intifadas deteriorated the living conditions of Palestinians. It was in response to the intifadas that Israel enacted checkpoints and constructed the West Bank wall. Thousands of Palestinians were killed in the intifadas, both in retaliatory IDF attacks and by fellow Palestinians on the charge of being collaborators. If history teaches us anything, there is no strategic reason to call for an intifada. An intifada won’t destroy Israel or free Palestine; it will provoke Israel to tighten restrictions. The only reason to call for an intifada is if one wishes for Israelis to be murdered. The only reason to call for a global intifada is if one wishes for Jews to be murdered. 

ARE THE PROTESTORS CALLING FOR AN INTIFADA CALLING FOR VIOLENCE?

Unequivocally, yes. While every person in attendance surely doesn’t understand what they are calling for, the organizers of the protests — those leading the chants and encouraging people to follow — very much know. In fact, they themselves have ties to groups that slaughtered innocents in the last intifadas.

Virtually all “pro-Palestine” protests in the United States are organized by groups such as Within Our Lifetime, Students for Justice in Palestine, and Samidoun. 

Samidoun has ties to the internationally-recognized terrorist group the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, has an office in Tehran, and is banned as a terrorist organization in Germany. The PFLP participated in both intifadas, killing scores of innocents, such as Dror Forer and Aran Bachar in 1993 (First Intifada) and three teenagers in the Karnei Shomron Mall suicide bombing in 2002 (Second Intifada). 

Within Our Lifetime and Students for Justice in Palestine both openly support Hamas, other Islamic Republic proxies, and the October 7 massacre. SJP’s founder, Hatem Bazian, is also the co-founder of American Muslims for Palestine, an organization formed by former members of the HolyLand Foundation, KindHearts, and the Islamic Association of Palestine, all of which were disbanded after its members were convicted of transferring material support to Hamas. 

Hamas took responsibility for two suicide bombings during the First Intifada and at least 54 suicide bombings during the Second Intifada. 

To them — to the people leading these protests — the intifadas have always been synonymous with violence against civilians. In deed and in action, they are showing us that another intifada would be no different. 

IS CALLING FOR AN INTIFADA ANTISEMITIC?

In this context, yes. Firstly, you have to understand that just about half of the world’s Jews live in Israel. In all Palestinian intifadas, all Israeli civilians were not only considered fair targets, but were in fact the preferred targets. If you believe every single Israeli is a fair target, then what you believe is that half of the world’s Jews are a fair target. That is no less genocidal than believing all of the world’s Jews are a fair target. Not even Hitler killed half of the world’s Jews; a third of the world’s Jews were murdered in the Holocaust.

It’s simply disingenuous to divorce calls for a Palestinian intifada from antisemitism. While Israelis of all backgrounds were killed at the hands of Palestinian terrorists in the intifadas, the terrorists sought Jewish areas, not, say, Druze villages. 

During the intifadas, Palestinian leaders mobilized their population with explicitly antisemitic rhetoric, drawing from unfavorable Hadiths about Jews, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, and even Mein Kampf. Both political and religious leaders delivered speeches and sermons rife with antisemitism. There is absolutely no reason to believe another intifada would be any different; the October 7 terrorists also mobilized with antisemitic rhetoric (“Mom, I killed ten Jews!” one of the October 7 terrorists said excitedly in a phone call to his mother). 

As far as the rhetoric prompting Palestinians to take up arms against Israel, nothing much has changed. In May 2021, for example, senior Hamas official Fathi Hammad went on the Hamas-run Al Aqsa TV channel and asked Palestinians in Jerusalem to “cut off the heads of the Jews.”

This is Izz al-Din Shuheil al-Masri of Hamas, who, in 2001, during the Second Intifada, carried out a suicide bombing at a Sbarro pizzeria in Jerusalem, killing 16. 

Al-Masri, like other Palestinian suicide bombers, recorded a video before his attack, where you see him holding a Quran, as he, like others like him, justified his attack by pointing to Muhammad’s struggle against the Jews in the seventh century. 

According to suicidologist Adam Czabański, Palestinian suicide bombers during the intifadas were predominantly motivated by the concept of an Islamic “holy war” against the Jewish state. In other words, they saw this as a matter of Muslims versus Jews. 

DESENSITIZING THE PUBLIC 

Maybe when you call for an intifada, you do not believe that you are calling for violence. Maybe you don’t believe that you are calling for the murder of Jews. Maybe your friends don’t either. But the thing is that it doesn’t matter. This is much bigger than you and your friends. You are getting swept up into a movement headed by groups with nefarious intentions.They are duping you, because they know you, like any decent person, want to stand on the side of justice.

No matter the state of antisemitism in the west eight months ago, you couldn’t just walk into a university quad and start openly screaming about killing Jews, because thousands of students wouldn’t join you that way. You start by desensitizing people to antisemitic rhetoric, through the use of dogwhistles and by relying on plausible deniability. This desensitization of antisemitic rhetoric leads to the eventual desensitization of antisemitic violence. This is how propaganda works, how dangerous people draw gullible people into their movements.

Consider that it took nearly six years from the Nazis’ rise to power for them to carry out their first antisemitic pogrom in 1938, euphemistically known as Kristallnacht, or “the night of the broken glass.” Despite the increasingly oppressive antisemitic policies in Nazi Germany, and the blatant antisemitic rhetoric and propaganda of its leaders, after Kristallnacht, the majority of the German public — and even some Nazi leaders! — expressed their disapproval of the violence, so much so that the regime ordered the press to downplay it. And yet, less than a decade later, by 1945, Nazi Germany had managed to exterminate six million Jews to little protest from the population. The desensitization happened incrementally. (I am not saying the Holocaust will happen again, so please don’t put words in my mouth. I am illustrating how people are desensitized to antisemitic violence). 

ON THE IMPORTANCE OF LANGUAGE 

Over the past decade, our society has taken great care to clean up its language, more than ever before. There are so many terms we’ve stopped using because they come from problematic histories and have been deemed harmful for a marginalized population. We’ve discussed microaggressions and political dogwhistles. We’ve talked about impact over intent. 

Yet somehow we are meant to believe that when crowds of thousands led by groups with intimate ties to those with Jewish blood on their hands call for an intifada, something that, certainly in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has only ever been a bloodbath, fueled by antisemitic rhetoric and incitement, we are meant to just trust that these people are not calling for violence against Jews? Please. How gullible do you think we are? Why do you continue to gaslight us?

When calls for an intifada are coupled with images of the inverted red triangle, a Hamas marker of violence, are we meant to believe that this doesn’t really imply violence against Jews? When you chant “there is only one solution, intifada revolution,” are we meant to ignore that this alludes to the Final Solution? That the chant explicitly rejects a two or a one-state solution in favor of violence against Israeli civilians, the majority of whom are Jews? When you scream for a global intifada, are we simply meant to ignore that the Islamic Republic’s terror network slaughters Jews not only in Israel, but in the diaspora as well? Are we meant to ignore that this rhetoric has correlated with the skyrocketing of violent antisemitic incidents elsewhere around the globe, including murder, kidnapping, synagogue bombings, and rape?

You are asking us to put a whole lot of trust that your violent words don’t actually mean violence just eight months after the single deadliest day for Jews since the end of the Holocaust. 

[girlactionfigure]

Los Angeles USA:

Pro-Palestinian protesters/terrorists took over a floor of a building at California State University in LA while holding lecturers from the university's academic staff, including the president of the university, hostage in the building.

##

That's how it is when your role model is a terrorist organization that kidnaps people... Maybe this will wake up some Americans who still don't understand what's going on around them.

[girlactionfigure]

australians_for_israel

Melbourne, Australia 🇦🇺  Two employees who were sacked after wearing keffiyehs to work at a bakery in Melbourne’s Chadstone shopping centre have launched a workplace discrimination case. Black Star Pastry, known for its watermelon cake, is facing a discrimination case that alleges the company breached Victoria’s Equal Opportunity Act. They claim the dismissal breached the legislation for loss of employment because it discriminated against two staff members on the basis of their political belief or activity. @guardianaustralia

[phonemantra-blog]

The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) campus erupted in controversy this week following the dismantling of a pro-Palestine encampment and a violent attack by counter-protesters. This article delves into the events that unfolded, the university's response, and the ongoing questions surrounding the situation. A Week of Tension: Protests, Violence, and Calls for Action The unrest stemmed from a weeks-long pro-Palestine demonstration on campus. Students erected an encampment on April 25th, organized by the UC Divest Coalition and Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA. This peaceful protest aimed to raise awareness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and advocate for divestment from companies linked to the Israeli occupation. Unrest at UCLA However, the situation escalated dramatically on Tuesday night. A group of masked counter-protesters, believed to be pro-Israel supporters, stormed the encampment. Violence erupted, with reports of tear gas, projectiles being thrown, and injuries sustained on both sides. The delayed response from law enforcement further fueled criticism. Despite a reported attack lasting for hours, students claim there was minimal police presence initially. This raised concerns about campus safety and the university's ability to protect students during demonstrations. Chancellor Block Responds: Condemnation, Investigation, and Justification Following the chaos, UCLA Chancellor Gene Block addressed the campus community in a letter. He acknowledged the "deep pain" caused by the events and condemned the attack on the encampment as a "horrific attack by a mob of instigators." He assured an ongoing investigation into the incident. However, Block also defended the university's decision to remove the encampment. He argued that it violated campus policies and created unsafe conditions. He explained that attempts at negotiation with protest leaders failed to reach a resolution, necessitating police intervention. Deep Scrutiny and a Call for Transparency Chancellor Block's explanation met with significant scrutiny. Questions arose regarding: The slow response by law enforcement. Critics, including California Governor Gavin Newsom, deemed the police action "unacceptable" and demanded better protection for students. The cancellation of additional police resources. The Los Angeles Times reported requests for more officers five days before the attack, which were mysteriously revoked. The identity and affiliations of the counter-protesters. Concerns remain about the origin and possible instigation of the violence. In response to these questions, UC President Michael V. Drake announced an independent review of the university's response and law enforcement actions. Chancellor Block also expressed gratitude for the investigation. Unanswered Questions and Continuing Tensions The aftermath of the UCLA campus unrest leaves a trail of unanswered questions and lingering tensions. The independent review will be crucial in shedding light on the following: The decision-making process behind the police response and the cancellation of additional resources. The role of campus leadership in managing the situation. The identities and motivations of the counter-protesters. Transparency and accountability from the university administration are critical to restoring trust and ensuring the safety of all students during future demonstrations. Looking Ahead: Steps Towards Resolution The events at UCLA highlight the complexities surrounding freedom of speech, security concerns, and the right to peaceful protest. Here are potential steps forward: A thorough and transparent independent review. This can help address the unanswered questions and hold those responsible accountable. Improved communication between campus leadership and student groups. Open dialogue can foster understanding and prevent escalation. Enhanced training for campus police on crowd control and de-escalation tactics. This can ensure a more effective and measured response to future protests. UCLA's campus community deserves a safe and inclusive environment for expressing diverse viewpoints. By addressing the shortcomings revealed during this week of unrest, the university can strive for peaceful dialogue and a more productive path forward.

[phonemantra-blog]

This article explores the recent events at UCLA involving a pro-Palestine encampment, a violent attack by counter-protesters, and the university's response that has sparked controversy. Uprising on Campus: Pro-Palestine Encampment Erected On April 25th, 2024, the UC Divest Coalition and Students for Justice in Palestine at UCLA established a pro-Palestine encampment on Dickson Plaza. This action aimed to raise awareness about the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The encampment remained peaceful for several days, with student protestors gathering and expressing their views. UCLA in Turmoil Violent Attack Rocks UCLA: Questions Surround Police Response The situation escalated dramatically on Tuesday night, May 1st, when a group of masked counter-protesters, reportedly affiliated with pro-Israel factions, stormed the encampment. Witnesses described the attack as "horrific," with the masked group wielding tear gas, throwing objects, and attempting to dismantle the encampment. Here, a crucial question emerges: Why did the police response appear delayed? Students within the encampment reported minimal to no response from law enforcement for several hours. This delayed response has drawn significant criticism from California Governor Gavin Newsom, student groups, and faculty members. Governor Newsom's representative called the police action "unacceptable" and emphasized the right to free speech does not justify violence. University Leadership Vows Investigation, Offers Explanation UCLA Chancellor Gene Block addressed the campus community through a letter acknowledging the "deep pain" caused by these events. He condemned the attack as a "mob action" and promised a thorough investigation. Chancellor Block further explained the university's approach to student protests. He justified the removal of the encampment due to safety concerns and its violation of university policies. However, this explanation hasn't quelled the criticism surrounding the perceived lack of protection for the pro-Palestine students during the attack. Independent Review Announced, Scrutiny Intensifies University of California President Michael V. Drake announced an independent review of the university's actions and the law enforcement response. This review aims to provide a transparent account of the events and identify areas for improvement. Meanwhile, scrutiny continues to mount. Questions remain regarding the identity of the masked attackers, the delayed police intervention, and the university's overall handling of the situation. Aftermath: Healing, Calls for Change The aftermath of this incident at UCLA is complex. The campus community grapples with the trauma of the attack, while calls for reform in university policies and improved response to student protests rise. Healing and reconciliation efforts will be crucial in the coming days and weeks. However, significant questions regarding university leadership, security protocols, and student safety remain to be addressed.

[phonemantra-blog]

A video circulating online has sparked controversy surrounding actor Alec Baldwin. The footage depicts a tense interaction between Baldwin and an unidentified individual at a New York City coffee shop. A Chance Encounter Turns Tense On Monday night, a video surfaced on X (formerly Twitter), uploaded by an account named "Crackhead Barney & Friends." The nearly minute-long clip showcases a heated exchange between Baldwin and the person filming. Here's a breakdown of the events: Alec Baldwin Captured "Free Palestine" Demand: The video opens with the individual approaching Baldwin and repeatedly requesting him to say "Free Palestine." Mentioning the Rust Shooting: The conversation takes a turn as the person brings up the ongoing involuntary manslaughter case against Baldwin, stemming from the fatal shooting of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins on the set of the film Rust. Mounting Pressure: The individual relentlessly questions Baldwin, criticizing him for the incident and demanding he advocate for "Free Palestine." Escalating Tensions: Baldwin attempts to de-escalate the situation by walking towards the coffee shop's exit and requesting the person to leave. However, the individual persists in filming and hurling accusations. A Physical Altercation? The video concludes with a potentially physical altercation. Here's what the footage suggests: Baldwin Calls for Help: Facing continued harassment, Baldwin seeks assistance from a coffee shop employee, presumably requesting them to call the police. Abrupt Ending: The individual continues verbally attacking Baldwin, using expletives towards Israel and Zionism. The video abruptly cuts off as Baldwin re-enters the coffee shop and appears to move the camera with his hand. The unclear ending has fueled speculation about a physical confrontation, with some suggesting Baldwin might have slapped the phone out of the person's hand. The Backdrop of Pro-Palestine Protests This incident coincides with a rise in pro-Palestine demonstrations across the United States, with universities like Columbia and NYU experiencing significant activity. Protests at Universities: Large-scale demonstrations have erupted on campuses, with some protestors occupying university grounds and blocking access. Tensions have reportedly escalated, leading to arrests and disruptions in academic activities. Increased Scrutiny of Israel-Palestine Conflict: The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestine has garnered renewed international attention. These protests reflect heightened public awareness and passionate advocacy for the Palestinian cause. The coffee shop encounter between Baldwin and the individual can be viewed within this broader context of heightened emotions surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict. Unanswered Questions and Potential Repercussions The video raises several questions: Did Baldwin Strike the Phone? The inconclusive ending of the video leaves the possibility of a physical altercation unclear. What Will Be the Fallout for Baldwin? This incident has the potential to tarnish Baldwin's public image, especially considering the ongoing legal case against him. Will There Be Legal Ramifications? Depending on the details of the incident, both parties might face legal repercussions. The coming days might reveal more information about the situation and its potential consequences.

[kick-a-long]

THAT is why it's a war crime for combatants to not wear uniforms.

every army on earth would be better at killing enemy soldiers and harder to kill if they didn't wear uniforms. the reason they do is that it lets the army distinguish armed targets. there are protections to civilians unless the army is dressed and operates like them.

Hard to believe that we actually need to say this...  We stand with Israel and the IDF 🇮🇱 🇭🇲

australians_for_israel