#poroshenko

[hale-my-nathan]

Trump Weird News - Crimea Declaration

[rightscoop]

Petro Poroshenko: "We must not only win the war, we should win peace"

When he was president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko says he knew how to get along with Donald Trump. The leader of the European Opposition Solidarity Party tells François Picard about how to handle the new administration in Washington and confirms that he is ready when the time comes to throw his hat into the ring to return to power. But it is not time for the elections, he explains. “You cannot…

[wisegardenbluebird]

LA GUERRA DE UCRANIA

En su último libro Francisco Veiga analiza las causas y la situación del actual conflicto bélico Francisco R. Pastoriza          Todas las guerras generan una buena cantidad de libros que tratan de explicar desde sus causas y su desarrollo hasta sus consecuencias. No iba a ser menos la de Ucrania, a más de un año desde que el 24 de febrero de 2022 la Rusia de Putin decidiera invadir este país…

[jollybone]

Old COD Cold War sketch dump feat. my Bell Andrik, Naga, Stitch, Perseus and Adler

[asirensrage]

This Means War - 11/?

Story Summary: Kate wasn’t expecting to take New York by storm. She was just looking for some peace, but when disaster after disaster starts piling up, she begins to regret her choice. At least until one week, and two extraordinary men, change everything. A story about finding the important things: the truth, yourself and your people.

Chapter Summary: Two bros chilling in a swan boat, one foot apart 'cause they're…commiserating about their love lives…

Find it on Ao3

Guess who's still alive? It's me! I hope you're all doing well. Thanks for hanging around for the yearly update 😂. Happy New Year! I hope you all have a great one and "the worst of your past is the best of your future."

taglist: @raith-way @zeleniafic @veetlegeuse  @chickensarentcheap @residentdormouse

@themaradwrites @kingsmakers @thatmagickjuju @awkwardchick87  @hayatoseyepatch

oc tag: @arrthurpendragon @endless-oc-creations  @stanshollaand @wordspin-shares

[the-jam-to-the-unicorn]

Here are the issues I have with the book. Since it's a lot, I'll try to keep it as short as possible and only mention my biggest problems with it. So this list is not complete and I could write pages about it.

Let me start by saying that a good autobiography (or any book that highlights a real life person) should be balanced. It should not glorify that person or pretend that person is a god and without mistakes. I also have no problem with critizing Ze, because, let's face it, yes he made mistakes and fucked things up in the past and not every war decision or speech or whatever was good or perfect. The point is: the critique should be fair and balanced (this obviously doesn't apply to bad people in general and the books about them; but since Ze isn't a bad person...you get what I want to say). The portrayal of Ze in the book is anything but fair or balanced. Or true, for that matter (unless literally every person in Ze's life and who knows him better, including the Kvartal fam, Olena, Andriy or people like them, have been lying to everyone for decades).

Throughout the whole book Shuster does say that Ze is Ukrainian (and Jewish) but also always tries to paint him as an "Ukrainian Russian" - so Ze is actually Russian despite being a "Ukrainian" (basically using one of Russia's Propaganda lies). Ze is basically a stubborn "Ukrainian" who kind of deserves all the hate and arrogance he gets from "real Russians" during KVN times (and later) because Ze is an insufferable asshole during his KVN times. And that Russian treated Ukrainian (or from other former Soviet Union countries) teams badly (including racist remarks, looking down on them, treating them like slaves, insulting them, not giving them a fair chance,...) teams awfully is, in Ze's case, deserved. Because Ze was oh so focused on always winning - no matter what and the cost.

Speaking of KVN: According to Shuster, Ze was terrible as a person during his first years of stardom. A maniac who only lived for applause and needs it to survive and was willing to do absolutely everything to win and beat other teams. Because, you know, he's so obsessed with winning. To a point were even he gives a flying fuck about the Kvartal team and their members (Shuster basically hints that they all disliked Ze and he was some kind of group dictator who only wanted to work and win all the time and was reckless and took to many risks and almost destroyed everyones lifes). When Shuster finds something positive to write about, he quotes people from Kvartal but what he quotes are just general statements or people saying what KVN was like during the 1990s and early 2000s. The moment Shuster writes about Ze and was he (allegedly) like during this time it's almost only "team members" and "people who knem him" and "classmates" and all that stuff - so anon sources. Or it's just Shuster telling stuff without saying what his source is or him just have feelings and thoughts and drawing conclusions. If people get named they - surprise, surprise - have a lot of times bad things to say about Ze or are people who we never ever have heard of as being part of Ze's life. Btw, it's not very hard to guess who the "team member", who talked the KVN years and adds a lot of negative talk about Ze, is... . Denys (yes, THAT Denys) contributed to the book with pictures, so chances are high he also talked to Shuster. If you ever wondered if the asshole would ever get over the fact that he fucked up and Ze kicked his ass out of the group - well, the answer is no. He now just tries to cash in on Ze. And since we are talking about Denys' obvious contribution to the book - he, once again, gave out private photos. How much we all wanna bet that he, once again, didn't ask for consent?!

Shuster also tries to paint Ze's family in a bad light. The father a tyrann who sacrified his wife's (Mama Ze) health for his job and money. Also rarely being at home and giving a fuck about his son and family. Mama Ze spoiling her child and making him entitled. Both to unloving and hard and more or less making Ze's life a living hell. Also that Ze's family was suddenly rich. Not to mention indirectly questioning the trauma his family had to go through (and Ze talked about in the past) under Stalin and the Nazis and family members that are suddenly alive (despite Ze stating in the past that they were dead). Also, Shuster sees in the childhood and family of Ze a part of the explanation why Ze is such a horrible person today, to stubborn to just give up and end the fight (and all that nonsense) and won't win this war. Because the parents put Ze in all kind of activities without him finishing any of it but letting him believe he can do everything and always demanding excellent perfomance in every aspect of his life (to keep it short). So of cooourse Ze had to grow up into a maniac who can't loose and always continues despite what people may tell him and who needs the constant validation and love from others.

There are also a ton of negative remarks about Ze as father and husband in regard of his own family. Not to mentiont hat a ton of informations are factually not correct. Things like birth dates or dates in general, how and where Ze's family lived (missing important context several times), Ze basically being as awful as his father, Ze not giving a fuck about his families safety during the war (Olena was the voice of reason who protects the poor, poor children because their father just wants them back for egoistic reasons and doesn't care about their safety) or not seeing anything concerning about his sons military obsession and instead fueling it (again, it's the poor poor wife who has to protect the son from the awful father), Ze giving zero fucks about his relationship with Olena right from the start and that poor, poor, poor woman always staying behind and having to go through hell and hate because of Ze's maniac ambitions and facing an unsave future in the early 2000s because Ze was so full of himself and had the biggest ego,... . (reading several parts you would think that this "poor, poor woman" is trapped in some abuse situation or Ze somehow tied her to himself and the whole marriage is fake and there is no love) (also Olena simultaniously romantizing things and her life and Ukraine but also being the only who who sees the truth about Ze or several parts of their lives but, of course, can't tell her terrible husband because bad, bad Ze) Also Shuster indirectly claiming that Ze and Olena lied about their relationship and they didn't date for eight years but for a shorter period of time. Because suddenly Olena also was a part of KVN long before Ze (???) and was essentially just his work buddy and friend for a while and somehow and for whatever reason they ended up in a relationship one day. (Also prepare yourself to read about a new version of the "Basic Instinct" story we never have heard before...and Ze and Olena never said.)

Btw, the way Ze is portrayed during his KVN years is essentially with little variation how he's portrayed in later stages of his life. Including his presidency and the war (I'm not going to write several more paragraphes because I think you get the picture Shuster tries to paint of Ze).

Only one thing about Ze's war portrayal: Shuster swings back and forth between Ze as wanna be dictator who will turn Ukraine into something bad as soon as the war is over (and is already starting with that) and who already makes his own rules and gives zero fucks about people and is only interested in his own fame and people applauding him and all that stuff. And Ze being the worst President ever because the war and the current state of Ukraine (which is, of course, very bad and they are about to collapse and loose and big Russia and winning and blablabla) are somehow also his fault. Yes, Shuster really manages to make Ze (and with that Ukraine) partly guilty.

Throughout the whole book he also, sometimes more obvious sometimes hidden, Shuster portrays Ukraine in the worst way possible. He does mention how "bad" Russia is but somehow justifying it several times or leaving out important facts and, once again, context. Also the portrayal of Putin, especially in comparsion with how he writes about Ze, is a joke.

Oh, and, the "inside look in the bunker" life Shuster used for his marketing campaign and that the claim of the book - yeah, bullshit. It's nothing now and anon and all that stuff. Also, once again, portraying Ze in a bad light. Like, yeah, the first weeks of war affected him but to such a worrying point (according to Shuster) that Ze was actually unfit to rule any longer as President but continued (because, you know, he loves power sooo much...). And now he's the mini dictator of Bankova who is always grumpy and changed into a (an even more) awful person and... .

What can I say at the end?! As mentioned earlier, the book has a ton of fake news and wrong facts. It's incredibly poorly researched - if sources exist at all. A lot of times it's Shuster just sharing his feelings or thougths or conclusions or interpretations or whatever. Or just saying things without context. Or writing stuff without giving sources. And to be honest, in some parts it also feels like that Shuster just made stuff up.

If you have no idea about Ze and his life or know very little - that's not the book to get informed. If you know a bit more about Ze, you will surprisingly often feel that certain parts of "exclusive interviews" or "when I talked with XYZ" are strangely familiar...with interviews we all know from Ze's (and several other people) past...because it is these interviews. Just a lot of times missing context, shortening what was said, adding stuff or giving it a new meaning.

Speaking of using old stuff: Shuster also really used his old articles to include them in the book...to a point where it's basically almost word for word.

Overall, the book is in large parts poorly written (so poorly that you wonder how he became a TIME journalist in the first place).

In the end, you probably haven't learned anything new or interesting about Ze, his life, the war or Ukraine. When we talk about Ze, I may have read one, maybe two new things I haven't read before (but questioning both of them and will do research if they are true or just made up by Shuster). It's over 300 sites of wasted paper and ink. I know articles who did a better job than this "book". It's a waste of time and money. And in the end it's a Pro-Russia Propaganda book, trying to undermine the support for Ukraine and hurt Ze and his image (as well as Ukraine's). Shuster tries to be subtle at his try to do this but he isn't not. He tries to come off as critical thinker who wants to portray a balanced picture of Ze and also writes about the sides no one dares to talk about. But nothing about this is balanced. It's just 300+ sites of trashing Ze and backstabbing him and using every possible way. Same applies to Ukraine.

.

[dadsinsuits]

Petro Poroshenko

[blackpilledkremlintsarina5294]

I feel bad for the Russians who were glad Trump won. They also bought into Trump's rhetoric. I thought Russians had the knowledge of Trump's role in the aggressions against their country. He armed Ukraine A LOT harder than Obamoron did. It's sad, really since that made the Zelensky administration buy more time to advance its aggression toward Russia. Zelensky started to consider joining NATO in 2020 when Trump was in office. The Minsk Accords weren't going to be honored if Trump was going to be in office or not. Ukraine and NATO were just buying more time. I don't care anymore if he was impeached for supposedly withholding aid from Ukraine because he was "concerned" about the corruption that was connected to the Bidens. Why would Trump even agree to arming Ukraine back in 2017 if he was that concerned about neo-nazis running the place? Why would he give Mike Johnson the green light to "loan" Ukraine money, and then call him an American "patriot?"

[tomorrowusa]

Fox News retainer Brian Kilmeade got his balls handed to him by the former president of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko. Kilmeade had tried to push a MAGA Hunter Biden conspiracy theory on live TV involving Ukraine.

At the heart of every single Republican conspiracy about both President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden’s activities in Ukraine is a single claim. The claim is that Joe Biden got Ukraine Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin sacked in order to protect energy company Burisma, where Hunter Biden was on the board. That was the claim former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani brought back from Ukraine, and the basis on which Donald Trump tried to blackmail Ukraine and earned his first impeachment. [ ... ] The idea that Shokin was fired to protect Burisma has been debunked so many times that de bunk is exhausted, but it has seldom gone down with as much grim satisfaction as it did on Sunday when Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade interviewed former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. [ ... ] Kilmeade: Is that why he got fired? Because of the billion dollars and the former vice president, now president? Poroshenko: First of all, this is a completely crazy person. This is something wrong with him. Second, there is not one single word of truth. And third, I hate the idea to make any comments and to make any intervention in the American election. We have very much enjoyed bipartisan support. Please do not use such person like Shokin to undermine the trust between bipartisan support and Ukraine.

The Viktor Shokin thing has been debunked to death. Shokin is the "completely crazy person" Poroshenko refers to. But Republicans and far right US media have adopted the Goebbelsian strategy of endlessly repeating it in the hope that such repetition will cause it to get traction. It's the current version of "but her emails!".

Shokin’s own deputy testified that there was no active investigation into Burisma at the time of Biden’s actions. And not only was all this looked into as part of Trump’s impeachment, a Republican investigation launched in 2020 specifically to find any wrongdoing by Biden ended in an 87-page report that “contained no evidence that the elder Mr. Biden improperly manipulated American policy toward Ukraine or committed any other misdeed.” The claim that Biden did something wrong in Ukraine wasn’t true, isn’t true, and can’t be made true through repetition. Shokin was fired because he was corrupt, bad at his job, and everyone complained.

When the leader of their party is a four-times indicted, twice impeached, orange blob of mendacity, the only hope of the MAGA mob is to invest in a very dubious false equivalency.

Hunter Biden isn't Joe Biden. But if you really wish to compare presidential relatives, look to Ivanka Trump and her husband Jared Kushner who (unlike Hunter Biden) were in a position in the White House actually to influence policy. The Trump offspring and offspring-in law could conduct a clinic on corruption through capitalizing on their names.

Facts never change the minds of brainwashed cult members. But if you shout louder and longer than the Trump cult it will reduce the impact they have on others.

[youthchronical]

Trump’s 'secret talks with Ukraine’s opposition': A plot to push Zelenskyy out? - The Times of India

President Donald Trump, right, meets with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine, left, in the Oval Office on Friday. Donald Trump’s team has reportedly been engaged in secret talks with Ukrainian opposition leaders, fueling speculation about a potential push to oust President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The discussions, which included opposition figure Yulia Tymoshenko and senior members of former…

[unhonestlymirror]

In my family, we were always taught to perceive all the suffering, genocide and stuff like something not that important to concentrate on, something which should be perceived like stuff you can even benefit from if you're smart enough and which you HAVE TO remember with humour - so when I express this mentality on Internet TM and it causes hate waves because most people perceive suffering too seriously... it always makes me go "Error 404". I get it but I don't get it.

[russianreader]

"It's Showtime": Open Space Moscow vs. SERB

Open Space is a project that supports grassroots activists. It has two sites, in Moscow and St. Petersburg, with co-working spaces, a human rights center, and a psychological center. The Moscow site is at odds with the pro-government movement SERB, known for its provocations against the opposition. Republic correspondent Nikita Zolotarev is often at Open Space, sometimes as a volunteer. That was…

[jollybone]

Bell in the duga ending be like:

Dylan “Bell” Butcher/ Andrik Poroshenko is my OC

click for better quality

[asirensrage]

Which OC do you associate with “don’t fuck with me, I have the power of god and anime on my side.”

Thank you for your consideration,

The Right Honourable Madame Ninjas

Listen, 100% this would be Kate. Whether or not she watches anime, she knows her memes. She would say this just to confuse someone.

(if we're talking Kate in TMW, she'd say this to Billy or Matt, just so she could see their expressions).

Hahah, this made me laugh. Thanks, Ninjas!

Send me a quote/tiktok or reel sound/meme and I’ll tell you which OC of mine I associate it with.

[ahmedmistrettaalyvezw]

En Ucrania se pide un impeachment del presidente. ¿Es inevitable la dimisión de Zelenski?

Después de que Zelensky y Trump tuvieron una gran pelea y se separaron infelizmente, se escucharon voces en Ucrania pidiendo el impeachment del presidente.

Según Observer.com, justo cuando la "guerra de palabras" entre los presidentes de Estados Unidos y Ucrania atraía la atención de los medios internacionales, el diputado ucraniano Alexander Dubinsky se pronunció en las plataformas sociales pidiendo al parlamento que celebrara una reunión de emergencia para iniciar un proceso de impeachment contra el presidente Zelensky.

También enumeró los “tres pecados” de Zelenski: el primero fue el fracaso en el conflicto ruso-ucraniano, que atribuyó a las graves consecuencias causadas por la “desastrosa toma de decisiones” de Zelenski;

La segunda es el fracaso de la política exterior, que llevó al aislamiento internacional de Ucrania y a la pérdida del apoyo de Estados Unidos, un aliado clave; la tercera es la acusación de que "violó los derechos civiles", específicamente al reprimir a la oposición y "usurpar el poder".

De hecho, en los últimos tiempos han surgido muchas voces que cuestionan la legitimidad del poder del presidente Zelenski. Además de Rusia, el presidente estadounidense Trump también ha instado públicamente a Ucrania a celebrar elecciones generales lo antes posible.

Recientemente, el ex presidente ucraniano Poroshenko declaró que "las elecciones generales ucranianas se celebrarán el 26 de octubre de este año", y acusó a Zelensky de intentar eliminar "enemigos fuertes" antes de las elecciones y de tomar medidas contra sí mismo como "líder de la oposición".

El propio Zelensky también ha prometido que estaría dispuesto a dimitir como presidente inmediatamente a cambio de que Ucrania se una a la OTAN.

Sin embargo, tras el último enfrentamiento con Trump, la actitud de Zelenski ha sufrido algunos cambios sutiles. Cuando se le preguntó si consideraría la posibilidad de dimitir, afirmó que "sólo el pueblo ucraniano puede decidir" si se queda o se marcha.

A juzgar por las actitudes de varios partidos, la presión real que enfrenta Ucrania ha aumentado enormemente la probabilidad de que Zelensky renuncie, especialmente la pérdida de apoyo de su aliado clave, Estados Unidos, lo que ha empeorado aún más la situación de Zelensky.

El conflicto entre Rusia y Ucrania está a punto de terminar, y la carrera política de Zelenski también podría llegar a su fin. Aunque el resultado ya está determinado, existe una diferencia entre dimitir voluntariamente y ser sometido a un impeachment.

El diputado ucraniano que esta vez pidió por primera vez el "impeachment" del presidente, Alexander Dubinsky, siempre ha estado en desacuerdo con Zelensky. Fue expulsado del Partido Siervo del Pueblo de Zelensky hace cuatro años y arrestado en 2023 acusado de "traición".

Por lo tanto, no es sorprendente que Zelensky fuera "pateado en el suelo" en un momento crítico.

Sin embargo, después de esta disputa en la Casa Blanca, la evaluación de Zelensky en Ucrania parece ser mixta.

Algunos observadores ucranianos creen que, aunque el estilo de comunicación de Zelensky es "demasiado emocional", su coraje es aún "digno de elogio"; otros están preocupados por esto, creyendo que la disputa entre las dos partes ha hecho que la esperanza de Ucrania de tener a Estados Unidos de su lado sea aún más escasa.

En cualquier caso, la "confrontación frontal" de Zelensky con Estados Unidos esta vez ha retrasado temporalmente el plazo para las conversaciones de paz entre Rusia y Ucrania, lo que también le da algo de tiempo a Ucrania para negociar con la administración Trump sobre el acuerdo mineral.

Pero sin la ayuda militar de Estados Unidos, el conflicto entre Rusia y Ucrania prácticamente habría llegado a su fin. Nadie pagará por todo lo que Ucrania pierda en esta guerra, pero alguien debe rendir cuentas por las consecuencias de su fracaso.

Desde esta perspectiva, la razón por la que Zelensky resiste la presión, se niega a hacer concesiones a Estados Unidos e insiste en obtener "garantías de seguridad" no es sólo luchar por los intereses de Ucrania, sino también dejarse una salida para evitar la "liquidación política" en el futuro.