#or other means of receiving incom directly from fans.

[tofutama]

Hack the planet

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

By: Michele Seminara

Published: Jan 4, 2024

My first exposure to what I now call “griftivism,” a hybrid of grifting and Critical Social Justice activism, occurred in the arts. It was 2020 when—in my role as managing editor of literary journal Verity La—I became embroiled in a social media cancellation precipitated by backlash to the publication of a story some deemed racist and sexist. The ensuing moral outrage razed our “little magazine that could” into internet infamy, where it remains strung up, replete with apologies, hanging its masthead in shame.   

Verity means “truth,” and the journal’s motto was “Be Brave”—rendering its demise that little bit sorrier and sadder. The story that sank our publication depicted a disaffected Australian academic engaged in a sexual affair with a local woman while in the Philippines. The protagonist was uncomfortable with what the author described as the “patriarchal and colonial” power imbalance between his two characters, but not guilty enough to resist. He was an un-admirable and unreliable narrator, and in publishing the story, we sought to unveil an unsavory truth about how some men use women for casual sex. This truth was not well received.

What confounded me most about the backlash to the piece was not the mechanism of cancellation (if you’ve seen one online takedown, you’ve seen them all) but the beliefs and motivations of the cancellers, their supporters, and the silent mob of onlookers.

Upon examining this dynamic, I became aware of a new type of grifter who hitches their self-interest to activism and thrives in a culture hell-bent on “being kind”—or, at least, in appearing to be so. “Griftivists,” I call them. 

The instigator of my cancellation was a colleague on the advisory board of our journal. Her bio on Ko-fi, an online “tip jar” to make “income directly from fans” proclaimed that she liked to “spread joy on social media, & care for others a lot.” Her Twitter feed was both a consummate work of self-curation and self-contradiction; earnest retweets from fellow social justice activists and scathing criticisms of “white people” (“Do not get me started on white men. Do not, ‘not all white’ me. I’m spicy today”) bookended daily selfies showcasing designer shoes, handbags, and dresses. Fine dining, trips to the theatre, and a steady stream of purchases sat incongruously beside tweets thanking followers for ostensibly essential UberEATS vouchers and requests to “buy her a Ko-fi” so that she could replace her cracked Miele cooktop or purchase a dehumidifier for her “damp” Sydney harbor-side apartment. Unbelievably, there was even a request for donations to enable the purchase of an alcoholic drink at the airport before boarding an international flight to go on vacation. Yet few seemed to notice the grift.  

Someone that did was Sangeetha Thanapal, a Singaporean-Thamil writer and academic residing in Australia, who, in response to the plethora of praise showered on my colleague (“You are such a treasure. Such an advocate. Such a wonderful writer. We are lucky to have you in the world”), boldly tweeted, “It’s enraging to me that Singaporean Chinese people… who have access to every privilege and opportunity, can come here and play ‘person of colour.’ And y’all will fall for it cos you have zero understanding of the dynamics of race in Asia… This is why POC spaces in Australia will continue to shield privileged people like her while shutting out actually disadvantaged people like me.”  

This surprised me. While I had no doubt that since moving to Australia my colleague had experienced racism, I hadn’t thought to question whether she was disingenuous to present herself as marginalized. She had, after all, grown up in a wealthy country as part of the dominant race and spoke English as her main language. Could she be appropriating disadvantage to her advantage, engaging in a kind of cultural double-dip to reap social and financial gain? For a lifelong small-l liberal, even entertaining the idea felt verboten.

* * *

Leading the charge in cancelling someone can be a profitable affair; in the cash-strapped arts, it can pay handsomely in the type of cultural capital that translates into invitations to publish work, speak at writers’ festivals, judge and win literary prizes, and secure competitive grants. In the year following the demise of my journal, my colleague succeeded in repurposing her tweets into a paid full-length article in a literary magazine, saw her Twitter followers burgeon from several hundred to nearly ten thousand, was featured in the news multiple times for her writing and social justice activism, and went on to receive two lucrative arts grants totaling seventy-five thousand dollars. 

Of course, racism, disadvantage, and marginalization are real and must be challenged. Those dedicated to doing so have historically favored the left-wing of politics, a space heavily populated by my demographic: middle-class, educated white women (sometimes known as “bleeding hearts”). Having always been progressive, I was stunned by how swiftly and irrevocably I was recast during my cancellation as a “white supremacist.” A dreaded open letter signed by hundreds of my peers even demanded our funders withdraw their support for our “systemically racist” journal, despite the fact that we worked as volunteers and prioritized publishing and paying writers from marginalized demographics. Logically it made no sense; nonetheless, I was racked by guilt and shame.

However, after schooling myself in the recent trends in Western culture (a.k.a. scouring Twitter), my naiveté quickly resolved. I was both relieved and alarmed to discover that my case paled in comparison to more extreme pile-ons occurring around the world. Particularly in the arts, a space in which you might assume dissenting views could be aired and debated, there was a spate of ad hominem attacks being waged that seemed motivated by a mixture of moral certainty, self-advancement, and thinly veiled glee. As another Australian publisher confided to me when weathering their own public take-down, “One becomes a piñata.”

* * *

The moniker “Verity” in Verity La not only means “truth” but was inspired by the name of a once famous bookshop in Australia’s capital city, Canberra—which, in turn, was named after the inspirational woman who founded it. Verity Fitzhardinge brought literary culture to Canberra at a time when sheep still grazed on the paddocks of Old Parliament House and D.H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover was banned. From 1938-69, her bookshop was an oasis, a meeting place for thinkers, students and dissidents marooned in a cultural backwater. When Verity La was conceived in 2010, its founding editor happened to live on Verity Lane (rendered “Verity La.” on the street sign), and thus, the literary journal destined to live and die on the sword of its truth was born. Having no experience as an editor and no prescience, I enthusiastically took the helm in 2014 and would infamously go down with the ship just six years later.

After my cancellation, like the heterodox patrons gathered in Verity’s bookshop eighty years earlier, I sought comfort in knowing I was not alone. I discovered Counterweight, an organization established by author and academic Helen Pluckrose to help promote “reason and freedom by encouraging critical thinking” and support people like me who found themselves at odds with the new cultural climate. I devoured books, articles, and podcasts and realized that the verbal jabs thrown at me (“It’s not enough to be not racist, you have to be anti-racist!”) were not original but parroted from the rhetoric of far-left activism. As the 2020 global shitshow gathered steam, cultural commentators were warning that Critical Social Justice (CSJ)—a progeny of postmodernism and Critical Theory with roots in Marxism—had breached the walls of academia and was spreading its own divisive worldview.

CSJ was originally touted as a way to address “prejudice and discrimination on the grounds of characteristics like race, sex, sexuality, gender identity, disability and body size.” This certainly sounded rather positive to me. It appealed to my social conscience and to that of many others, as evidenced by the viral popularity of social media hashtags like #BlackLivesMatter and corporate advertising campaigns like Nike’s "For Once, Don’t Do It," urging Americans not to turn their backs on the issue of racism.   

Yet, as I discovered, the stated goal of ending bigotry was soon subverted—hijacked, if you will—by those wishing to bend the truth to their own advantage.

Perhaps this should come as no surprise since CSJ was born of the postmodern view that knowledge is not objective, but socially constructed to maintain power. Critical theorists scrutinize structures, language, and social interactions to identify and dismantle oppressive power systems and dominant “truths.” This makes for an enlightening thought experiment, but in the wilds beyond academia, it’s easy to see how things might go awry. For if there is no objective yardstick for ranking truths, how will we know what to believe, and what values will we allow to guide us?

Enter the de-and-postcolonial theorists who argued for not only dismantling power systems such as white supremacy but inverting them. Drawing on their revolutionary vision, CSJ activists declared that those best placed to call out the oppressors’ false truths and design fairer alternatives are the ones who suffer oppression most: the marginalized. Perhaps because, in the absence of any method for judging the worth of one socially constructed thing against another, our safest bet is to run in the opposite direction of the powerful towards the powerless. But while it’s undeniably fair and wise to acknowledge, listen to, and learn from the experience of marginalized people, when groups who are viewed as oppressed are elevated to an unquestionable ethical status, problems predictably arise.

This has been evidenced in numerous social justice movements over the last decade (think #MeToo’s “Believe All Women” slogan), with activists claiming that lived experience trumps all other forms of knowledge and that the most marginalized person’s lived experience is the most valid. It follows that your right to engage in cultural and political dialogue is now dependent on your identity and positionality: the lower your position, the higher your status and the more weight your “truth” holds. Any skepticism is dismissed as racist, sexist, and so on. Even if you are a “marginalized” person whose dissenting views are inconvenient to the majority of activists within your group, you risk being diagnosed with “internalized” prejudice or dismissed as an “Uncle Tom.” Sadly, progressives have adopted this worldview with empathic gusto. I know I did. Many well-meaning people do. And so have corporations, universities, whole industries, and governments, effectively transforming the left—a formerly meager hunting ground for opportunists seeking power and reward—into a space fertile with possibilities for those on the grift.

The socially-enforced expectation that we not question the efficacy of progressive activist movements (or risk backlash and potential cancellation) has proved a godsend for the griftivist and has engendered what cultural commentators call a form of “new puritanism.” Whereas society used to judge morality according to religious and conservative values, now there is a shift to make the same judgments based on absolute acceptance of the tenets of CSJ. This has fostered a rigid leftist ideology equal to the far-right in both its pronouncements of acceptable truth and willingness to extinguish dissent. That may seem counterintuitive for a theory embedded in postmodern skepticism, but it’s perhaps not so surprising given human nature; as Lord Acton said, “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” There is now power in being oppressed (or at least in appearing to be) and by establishing themselves as the marginalized or their allies and espousing the requisite leftist beliefs whilst denouncing those who fail to do so, the unscrupulous griftivist—like the Wolf dressed in Grandma’s clothing—succeeds in veiling their selfish intent under a cloak of harmlessness and virtue. And soft-hearted progressives, not hip to the ruse, are being eaten up.

* * *

A 2023 study published in the journal Current Psychology by Ann Krispenz and Alex Bertrams of the University of Bern entitled “Understanding left-wing authoritarianism: Relations to the dark personality traits, altruism, and social justice commitment” provides insight into the psyche of the griftivist. First, researchers characterized left-wing authoritarianism (LWA) as comprising three interconnected factors: anti-conventionalism, top-down censorship, and anti-hierarchical aggression. “Anti-conventionalism” is a dogmatic endorsement of radical moral values coupled with a desire to impose them on others. “Top-down censorship” is the use of authority to quash opposition and suppress “offensive and intolerant” speech. And “anti-hierarchical aggression” is the drive to overthrow and punish those with power. Together these paint a recognizable, if somewhat disturbing, portrait of left-wing CSJ activism, where the most virulent proponents possess traits mirroring those we’re accustomed to seeing on the authoritarian far-right.

To better understand left-wing authoritarianism, researchers designed two studies exploring its relationship with narcissism and psychopathy, as well as its correlation with traits they defined as prosocial, like altruism and social justice commitment. They found that left-wing activists who endorse aggressive actions to overthrow those in power are more likely to demonstrate “manipulative and exploitative behaviors… self-perceived entitlement, arrogance, reactive anger, distrust, lack of empathy, and thrill-seeking.” They also found that “neither dispositional altruism nor social justice commitment was related to left-wing anti-hierarchical aggression.” In fact, they concluded that “some political activists on the left side of the political spectrum do not actually strive for social justice and the support of underprivileged groups or persons, but rather endorse or express violence for the satisfaction of their own ego-focused needs.” Meaning that the most strident and morally outraged CSJ activists might not be driven by the desire for social justice at all. Quite the opposite.

As Krispenz and Bertrams explained to the science news website PsyPost, left-wing activism provides bad-faith players with “opportunities for positive self-presentation and displays of moral superiority to gain social status and dominate others.” Worse, those who “strive for influential positions that involve social visibility and outreach as well as access to financial and other resources” will likely misuse progressive movements for private purposes and cause “irreparable financial and reputational harm.” Indeed, it would seem a significant number of those marching under the banner of “doing good” while extolling others to “do better” and “be kind” are impelled by selfish, devious, or even harmful motives. And some are just on the grift.

So concerned were the authors that they advised minority groups should be made aware of these “narcissistic ‘enemies’ from within” who might hijack their causes and whose behavior could lead to dwindling public support.

Furthermore, they identified a phenomenon they dubbed “the dark-ego-vehicle principle” in which “individuals with dark personalities—such as high narcissistic and psychopathic traits—are attracted to certain ideologies and forms of political activism.” For example, someone might “participate in a pro-BLM protest pretending to fight against racism while actually using such protesting activities to meet their own aggressive motives and thrills” or because “this form of activism can provide them with opportunities for positive self-presentation (e.g., virtue signaling).”

The trajectory of the discredited Black Lives Matter Global Network certainly bears this out. In the wake of George Floyd’s death in 2020, corporations and individuals desperate to demonstrate their CSJ credentials poured hundreds of millions of dollars into the organization globally. Happy to profit off the empathy (or, more cynically, the virtue-signaling) of those willing to donate to BLM, one of its founders, Patrisse Cullors, controversially bought a house worth $1.4 million. Another BLM organizer, Xahra Saleem, was recently jailed for stealing donations intended for a British “anti-racist” group. And there are still several lawsuits involving alleged misuse of BLM funds by members ongoing; as UnHeard journalist Niall Gooch noted: “When a cause is hedged around with taboos... to the extent that obvious questions about governance, spending and oversight are simply not asked, that cause will attract grifters like moths to a flame.”

Of course, activism per se is not psychopathic; Krispenz and Bertrams’ study merely confirms that for a confluence of reasons, leftist CSJ movements are currently attracting dark personality types. There are still many political activists who get involved for positive reasons. That’s a relief on the one hand, but a concern on the other; it suggests that the volatile world of left-wing activism is currently a murky meeting point of malignant griftivists and socially conscious bleeding hearts being manipulated into rewarding them. It’s a worrying trend that—once recognized—you begin to see everywhere.   

Take, for example, my field: writing and publishing. The dirty secret behind the submissions wall is that many editors now read bios before even considering a writer’s work, and all know that the way to secure lucrative government funding is to tick as many diversity boxes on grant applications as possible. Of course, many (perhaps even the majority) of those working in publishing are motivated by good intentions and aim to nurture and platform underrepresented writers. However, it’s not a stretch to imagine that as publishers jostle to showcase the work of the marginalized, they might attract the attention of a canny griftivist.

One who twigged to these opportunities earlier than most was Norma Bagain Toliopoulos (otherwise known as Norma Khouri), who made a literary killing in the early 2000s with her “memoir” Forbidden Love. The book hinged on the false narrative of its author growing up in Jordan before fleeing on witnessing her best friend’s “honor killing.” Norma referred to herself as a “humanitarian” and claimed she wrote the memoir to give voice to the plight of oppressed Arab women, yet was not only found to have duped her worldwide readership, but was investigated by the FBI for having swindled lovers, friends, family, and even elderly and infirm strangers out of at least one million US dollars. Her ruse was uncovered after her publisher, Random House, received a twelve-page dossier from the Jordanian Women’s Commission outlining seventy-three factual errors and discrepancies they had noticed in the book. An eighteen-month investigation revealed that, far from being a Jordanian who fled her home, Khouri was an American passport holder who had lived in Chicago from the age of three. Rana Husseini, a Jordanian writer and human-rights activist who spent years actually exposing and working to eradicate her country’s honor killings, told journalists that by profiting off false narratives about Middle-Eastern women’s deaths and appropriating the work of activists, Khouri—like the opportunistic Dark Triad individuals Krispenz and Bertrams warn of—had effectively “ruined our cause.”

A no less scandalous case is that of Egyptian-Australian activist Eman Sharobeem, who grifted on a fake narrative of being forced to marry her first cousin as a child bride before escaping to Australia. She was a finalist in the 2015 Australian of the Year Awards and founded two publicly funded not-for-profit community organizations to assist immigrant women before being found guilty of fraud in 2017 for misappropriating upwards of $800,000 in public funds for personal use. Like Khouri, Sharobeem styled herself as a women’s rights activist while stealing from the marginalized communities she claimed to support. She wasn’t investigated until a group of determined migrant women working for one of her organizations repeatedly filed complaints about her financial misappropriation and bullying of staff. Only then was it discovered the prominent activist’s entire backstory was fabricated, including her claim to have two PhDs. When asked how such fragrant lies could pass unchecked, the Immigrant Women's Health Service board chairman Audrey Lai testified, “We trusted Eman. We thought she had such a good reputation and high profile in the community, we didn't check. It's not very wise in hindsight but unfortunately we were very gullible because we believed in her.”

* * *

Establishing belief in an oppressed identity, a common enemy, or a worthy cause, is central to the griftivists’ game. And it’s disturbingly easy because few of the precariously privileged who have the power to call out their lies are prepared to risk questioning the veracity of a social justice activist’s claims; their reputations and often livelihoods depend upon asserting the emperor is indeed clothed.

Instead, the dirty business of calling out the truth is often left to the people who can afford it least but who it affects the most: people from the marginalized communities that the griftivists leech off.

Take, for example, the case of Rachel Dolezal, a white woman whose career, memoir, and Netflix documentary were based on her identification as a black American. While some white commentators were quick to reach for explanations such as mental instability and childhood trauma to explain Dolezal’s bizarre behavior, many black critics accused her of exploiting the history of black suffering in order to opt into victimhood and co-opt lucrative leadership positions in the black community. One of the most intriguing aspects of Dolezal’s case is that she continues to uphold her black identity despite admitting to being biologically Caucasian, claiming that race is just a “social construct”—another example of how the postmodern elasticization of “truth” is artfully manipulated by griftivists.

Another sphere where griftivists opting into an oppressed identity to secure advantage has succeeded is in the gender versus sex debate, with some biological men exploiting society’s support for transgender people to enter previously sex-segregated spaces, often with disastrous results. After violent criminal Stephen Wood (who adopted the name Karen White) expediently claimed to be trans while awaiting trial for multiple sexual crimes and then reoffended while housed in a women’s prison, there was outrage from both the gender critical and trans communities. Many feminists claimed such outcomes were the inevitable result of the recent legal and social sanctioning of gender self-identification and used the case to demonstrate the incompatibility of all trans women in all women’s spaces. However, trans activists, such as Steph Richards, denied that Wood was transgender at all and argued that by claiming to be so with nefarious intent, he had created a public and media backlash that harmed the trans rights movement. Indeed, in 2023, the British Ministry of Justice tightened its rules in an effort to curtail people of bad faith exploiting policies designed to keep inmates of all genders safe. As Richards pointed out, “Wood was very aware that the Prison Service procedures at that time (they have subsequently changed) meant that he could self-identify as a trans woman and easily get transferred to the female estate. This offered Wood two significant advantages... Firstly he himself would be in a safer environment... Secondly, he would be close to vulnerable cisgendered females and trans women—potentially more victims.” Yet another case where a malevolent griftivist exploited the empathy and damaged the reputation of the social justice movement that harboured him.

Griftivists and their cons come in many shapes and sizes—from hate crime hoaxes, to identity appropriation, to outrageously priced diversity dinners—but what they share is a canny eye for the opportunities created by Critical Social Justice ideology and a willingness to trade on progressive guilt in order to advance their own ends, often while destroying their competitors with allegations of bigotry. It’s beyond dispiriting.

In his essay ‘The Curse of the Man Who Could See the Little Fish at the Bottom of the Ocean,” sinologist Pierre Ryckmans pondered belief, truth and lies after the ruthlessness of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was confirmed in the wake of the Tiananmen Square massacre. For twenty years prior to the massacre, Ryckmans (who wrote for security reasons under the pen name Simon Leys) was a rare dissenting voice in the West. His warnings about the Chinese regime were drowned out by leftist media, academics, and film stars who were convinced that the Maoist Revolution was a net good. When asked how the world could have failed to recognize the reality of the CCP for so long, Ryckmans chose to ponder a much more profound question: “How and why do we usually endeavor to protect ourselves against the truth?” For, as he noted, the truth can be disturbing, inconvenient, and dangerous to acknowledge. Perhaps this explains why, in a culture captured by Critical Social Justice, we’re committed to not seeing certain obvious but unpopular “truths,” or to bending the truth so far out of shape with clever theories that it essentially becomes meaningless.

With a nuance atypical by today’s standards, Ryckmans’ article outlines the varied reasons people might choose to believe lies, even in the face of evidence to the contrary: “What people believe is essentially what they wish to believe. They cultivate illusions out of idealism—and also out of cynicism. They follow their own visions because doing so satisfies their religious cravings, and also because it is expedient. They seek beliefs that can exalt their souls, and that can fill their bellies. They believe out of generosity, and also because it serves their interests. They believe because they are stupid, and also because they are clever. Simply, they believe in order to survive. And because they need to survive, sometimes they could gladly kill whoever has the insensitivity, cruelty, and inhumanity to deny them their life-supporting lies.”

The lies peddled by CSJ activism and exploited by griftivists are not ones we are supposed to question, and yet, everyone does—in their minds, in their hearts, and in private rooms and messages, away from the censorious and punitive eyes and ears of ideologues.

We question privately because to do so publicly risks joining the ranks of the cancelled, becoming one of the shunned. Calling out griftivists can extract a heavy personal and professional price.   

One of the more tragic examples in recent years is that of Canadian school principal Richard Bilkszto who took his own life after being publicly shamed for questioning Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion trainer Kike Ojo-Thompson during a Zoom presentation in which she claimed that Canada was a bastion of “white supremacy and colonialism.” The Toronto District School Board has finally announced an investigation into Bilkszto’s tragic case, but not before two years of bullying, disbelief, and social media pile-ons fatally took their toll. While his family must continue without him, Bilkszto’s peers who smeared him as racist for merely questioning Ojo-Thompson’s “truth” have prevailed.

Human rights activist Ginetta Sagan wrote that “silence in the face of injustice is complicity with the oppressor.” The questions we might ask in cases like Bilkszto’s are: where was the injustice and who was the oppressor? Or perhaps it’s time to drop the often-weaponized framework of oppressor and oppressed entirely for something that has the potential to unite us.

I imagine only a handful who took part in my cancellation did so out of self-interest or spite. Most believed the “truth” my detractors spun, and those who didn’t played along or stayed silent for fear of joining the ranks of the cancelled. Their fears were well-founded; the power of the scarlet letter is frighteningly real. To disarm the griftivists and limit the harm they cause their victims and the justice movements they claim to champion, more of us must fight for what Verity La tried to: truth and the bravery to face it. By doing so, and by speaking up, we can strip the Wolf of Grandma’s clothing and unveil bad-faith players.

[littlemissidontcare]

AW principal work and income are brand deals. Her association with Seb made her gain IG followers and more traffic to her stories. Everytimes she posts something people are watching her stories in hope to see Seb or have infos about him. She knows that. And it's own she makes money. More traffic on her story means she Can ask more money. It doesn't matter if people are looking to hate on her or leave nasty comments ! Her number are growing. And unfortunatly AW always received hate. It didn't start with Seb.//This. She benefits from this rs no matter if it’s real or fake. She will get more brand deals, maintain the ones she has, get more eyes on her IG from some casting directors who care about social media presence (most don’t), comped or discounted rates in hospitality industry, more free stuff, etc etc. Saying that Annabelle receives no monetary gain from dating high profile men is ignorance. Saying Sebastian gets no monetary gain from dating a beautiful actress/model is also ignorant. Everything stated for Annabelle (excluding brand deals IF he doesn’t have any) he receives as well and he’ll receive much more because he’s the higher profile figure. He gains desirability in several demographics, increase of mentions in press whether her name is mentioned or not, casting directors who care about social media (active or not), and no matter what yall say about this next part it’s still true to this day: Sex Sells. He’s more desirable in all demographics (the general public) when he’s with a woman whether he’s Just fucking, dating or serious. Being single doesn’t sell to the general public, only his fans. I’m team idc. They both benefit from this rs because they are both public figures. The only “contract” these two have signed is an NDA to protect what can be said or not said during and after the rs. All celebs have these. It’s really this simple. You’ll never know how they feel about each other until one or both say something directly addressing their feelings. And I don’t trust social media posts of any kind to determine someone’s rs status. Social media is curated by the one running it. It’s all about the positive stuff. Even when there’s negative stuff going on in their lives. Too many people are not honest and celebrities are the last people I would believe about anything they posted. It’s always about selling the product. That includes their lifestyles and their images. I’m not saying their rs is fake but what they post, Seb included when he was active, is selling you an image. 💁‍♀��

[musicdistribution123]

Retain Full Control: Submit Your Single on YouTube with 100% Royalties

In the competitive world of music, independent artists often struggle to retain control over their earnings. While platforms like YouTube offer a vast audience, many artists find themselves sacrificing part of their income to third-party distributors. The good news is that with the right strategies, you can submit your single on YouTube with 100% royalties and keep full control of your music income. This article will guide you through the process, helping you understand how to maximize your earnings without losing any share to intermediaries.

The Importance of Royalty Control for Independent Artists

As an independent artist, every dollar counts. Many traditional distribution services charge a percentage of the royalties generated from streaming platforms, including YouTube. This is where you lose a portion of your potential earnings. However, 100% royalties means that all the revenue generated from ads, super chats, memberships, and other monetization options goes directly to you.

When you retain full control of your royalties, you have more flexibility in how you use your earnings. You can reinvest in your music career, whether that’s funding your next music video, promoting your singles, or supporting your live performances. This financial autonomy is essential for independent musicians striving to grow their careers on their own terms.

Choosing the Right Distribution Service for 100% Royalties

The first step to ensuring you keep 100% royalties is selecting the right distribution service. Many services, such as DistroKid, TuneCore, and Deliver My Tune, allow you to upload your music directly to YouTube and other platforms without taking a cut from your earnings.

When choosing a distributor, make sure to research their terms carefully. Some services charge fees for distribution or take a percentage of the royalties generated. It's crucial to pick a service that does not deduct anything from your YouTube earnings. Platforms like Deliver My Tune are a great choice because they offer artists the ability to distribute music with zero revenue cuts, meaning you keep everything you earn.

How YouTube Monetization Works for Musicians

YouTube is one of the largest platforms for music discovery and monetization. As an artist, you can monetize your music through ads that play before, during, or after your video. YouTube also offers other monetization options, such as super chats, memberships, and fan funding.

However, to ensure that you receive 100% royalties, it’s essential to understand how these monetization systems work. Ads are a significant revenue stream for musicians, and YouTube’s algorithm rewards videos with high engagement. As your views and interactions increase, so does your potential revenue.

For proper monetization, your music must be registered under YouTube’s Content ID system. This system helps protect your work by ensuring that any use of your music on the platform is properly monetized. It can even generate income if other users upload your song in their videos, giving you an extra source of revenue.

The Role of Content ID in Protecting Your Earnings

Content ID is one of the most powerful tools for artists seeking to retain full control over their royalties. Once your music is uploaded and monetized on YouTube, Content ID helps identify your work whenever it is used across the platform, even if it's not directly uploaded by you.

If someone else uses your song in their video, Content ID will automatically claim the video on your behalf, ensuring that you earn revenue from it. This protection is crucial for ensuring that your music is never used without compensation. Many distributors, including Deliver My Tune, automatically enable Content ID when you upload your music, which means that your music is instantly protected from unauthorized use.

Maximizing Your Earnings with YouTube’s Multiple Monetization Streams

While ads are the primary source of income for many YouTube videos, there are other ways to maximize your earnings as an independent artist. In addition to ad revenue, YouTube allows creators to earn money through super chats during live streams, channel memberships, and even direct fan donations.

To fully benefit from these monetization streams, make sure your YouTube channel is set up to take advantage of them. Enable all monetization options available, such as ads, super chats, and fan funding. If you have a substantial following, you can also use YouTube’s merchandising tools to sell branded products directly to your fans.

By submitting your single to YouTube with 100% royalties, you ensure that every revenue stream benefits you, not a distributor or third-party service. The more monetization options you activate, the greater the potential for increasing your income from the platform.

Steps to Submit Your Single on YouTube and Keep 100% Royalties

Now that you understand the importance of retaining full royalties and how YouTube monetization works, let’s walk through the steps to ensure you submit your single with 100% royalties:

Choose a distributor: Platforms like Deliver My Tune, DistroKid, and TuneCore are great options for submitting your music to YouTube while retaining full royalties. Make sure to check that the distributor offers 100% royalty retention.

Upload your single: Once you’ve selected your distributor, upload your music. Be sure to select YouTube as one of the distribution platforms, and check that Content ID is enabled.

Enable monetization: After uploading your single, go to YouTube and ensure that monetization is enabled for your video. This will allow YouTube to start running ads and generating revenue on your behalf.

Track your earnings: Use the analytics tools provided by YouTube and your distributor to track the performance of your single and the earnings it generates. This will help you understand where your revenue is coming from and how you can optimize your monetization strategies.

Conclusion

Retaining 100% royalties from your music on YouTube is crucial for independent artists who want to maintain full control over their earnings. By choosing the right distribution service, like Deliver My Tune, and taking advantage of YouTube’s monetization features, you can ensure that every cent earned from your music goes directly into your pocket.

With tools like Content ID and multiple monetization streams, YouTube offers a powerful platform for independent artists to grow their audience and increase their revenue. By following the steps outlined in this article, you can submit your single on YouTube with full royalty retention and start maximizing your income today.

Related Articles:

For further reading, explore these related articles:

Submit your single on YouTube as an independent artist

Submit your single on YouTube without a label

Submit your single on YouTube with no upfront fees

Submit your single on YouTube quickly

For additional resources on music marketing and distribution, visit DMT RECORDS PRIVATE LIMITED.

[officevalle]

Why You Should Submit Your Album on Gaana to Get Paid

Are you an aspiring musician looking for ways to earn from your art? The digital age has opened incredible opportunities for artists to reach a global audience, and music streaming platforms are at the forefront of this revolution. One platform that stands out in terms of audience reach and monetization is Gaana. With millions of active users, Gaana offers a seamless way for artists to submit their albums and get paid for their creative work. In this guide, we’ll explore why submitting your album on Gaana could be one of the smartest moves for your music career.

The Financial Perks of Gaana

As an artist, the ultimate goal is to share your music with the world while earning a living. Gaana makes this possible through its revenue-sharing model. Here’s how Gaana helps artists generate income:

Royalties for Every Stream Each time someone listens to your song on Gaana, you earn a royalty. While the per-stream rate may seem small, these royalties can add up quickly when your music gains traction.

Revenue from Premium Subscriptions Gaana has a large base of paid subscribers. A portion of the subscription revenue is distributed to artists based on the number of plays their songs receive. This means the more engaging and popular your music, the higher your earnings.

Ad-Based Earnings Gaana also generates revenue through ads for its free users, and part of this revenue is allocated to artists. This dual revenue model ensures that you can earn whether your listeners are free users or premium subscribers.

Breaking Barriers for Independent Musicians

In the past, breaking into the music industry required significant financial backing and connections. Gaana changes this dynamic by providing independent artists with a level playing field.

Direct Access to Millions of Listeners With Gaana, there’s no need for a record label or middleman to distribute your music. You can directly reach millions of listeners across India and beyond.

A Platform for Diverse Genres Gaana caters to a wide variety of music genres, from Bollywood hits to indie music, classical, regional, and even international tracks. Whatever your style, there’s an audience for it on Gaana.

Opportunities to Go Viral Gaana’s algorithm often promotes new and trending tracks, giving independent artists a chance to be discovered by a massive audience.

Maximizing Your Revenue Potential

Once you submit your album on Gaana, it’s essential to ensure your music reaches as many people as possible. Here are some strategies to help you maximize your earnings:

Optimize Your Album Metadata Ensure your album details, including title, genre, and artist name, are accurate and keyword-rich. For instance, including keywords like “new indie album” can make your music more discoverable on the platform.

Leverage Social Media Promote your album on platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Share snippets, behind-the-scenes content, and stories to build excitement and drive traffic to your Gaana profile.

Collaborate with Other Artists Collaborations can expose your music to a broader audience. Partner with fellow musicians to create tracks or playlists that highlight your work.

Engage with Your Fans Interact with listeners who support your music. Respond to their comments and share their feedback to build a loyal fanbase.

How to Submit Your Album on Gaana

Submitting your album on Gaana is a straightforward process, but it’s important to get it right to avoid delays or rejections. Here’s a step-by-step guide:

Choose a Digital Distribution Partner Gaana partners with digital distribution platforms like TuneCore, DistroKid, and CD Baby. These platforms help you distribute your music to multiple streaming services, including Gaana.

Prepare Your Audio Files Ensure your music files meet Gaana’s quality standards. Typically, high-resolution audio files in formats like WAV or MP3 are required.

Add Metadata Include essential information such as track titles, artist name, album name, release date, and genre.

Submit Your Album Use your chosen distribution partner’s platform to upload your album and select Gaana as one of the streaming platforms for distribution.

Monitor Your Performance Once your music is live on Gaana, use the platform’s analytics tools to track your streams, audience demographics, and earnings.

Avoiding Pitfalls: Common Mistakes to Avoid

Submitting your album on Gaana is relatively easy, but some common mistakes can hinder your success. Here’s what to avoid:

Low-Quality Audio Poor audio quality can result in your album being rejected. Always use professional equipment and software for recording and mastering.

Incomplete Metadata Missing or incorrect information can delay your album’s approval process. Double-check all details before submission.

Ignoring Promotion Simply uploading your album isn’t enough. Consistent promotion is necessary to attract listeners and boost streams.

How Gaana Stands Out from Competitors

While there are several streaming platforms available, Gaana has unique features that make it a top choice for artists:

Localized Content Gaana’s audience includes listeners from different regions and languages, allowing you to cater to diverse demographics.

Custom Playlists Gaana often curates playlists for specific themes or genres, and being featured in these playlists can significantly increase your exposure.

User-Friendly Interface The platform’s intuitive design ensures that users can easily discover and play your music, boosting your chances of gaining streams.

Why Now is the Best Time to Submit Your Album

The music industry is more competitive than ever, but it’s also more rewarding for those who take advantage of digital platforms like Gaana. With the growing popularity of streaming services, there’s never been a better time to share your music with the world.

Increasing Listener Base Gaana’s audience continues to grow, giving you access to an expanding market.

Shift to Digital Consumption With physical album sales declining, streaming is now the dominant way people consume music.

Opportunities for Long-Term Growth Unlike traditional album sales, streaming provides a steady income stream over time as people continue to discover and play your music.

Conclusion

Submitting your album on Gaana to get paid is a game-changer for musicians who want to monetize their passion. The platform offers a unique blend of massive reach, fair payouts, and tools to help you succeed. By optimizing your submission, promoting your music effectively, and engaging with your audience, you can make the most of what Gaana has to offer.

Don’t wait for the perfect moment—start your journey today and turn your music into a sustainable source of income with Gaana!

Related Articles:

For further reading, explore these related articles:

How to Submit Your Album on Gaana and Gain Maximum Exposure

How to Submit Your Album on iTunes for Free: A Step-by-Step Guide

How to Submit Your Album on iTunes in India

How to Submit Your Album on iTunes Globally: A Step-by-Step Guide

For additional resources on music marketing and distribution, visit DMT Records Private Limited.

[dmtrecordspvtltd]

The Benefits of Releasing Music Without a Label

In today’s digital age, independent music is flourishing like never before. With the rise of music streaming platforms and social media, artists have the tools they need to distribute their music, build their brands, and connect directly with their audience. One of the major advantages of this new era is that musicians no longer have to rely on traditional record labels to get their music heard. Releasing music without a label allows artists to maintain creative control, keep a larger share of the profits, and build a loyal fanbase without interference.

If you're an independent artist, the opportunity to Share your single on Gaana without a label provides a significant avenue to reach millions of listeners. Gaana is one of the largest music streaming platforms in India, with over 150 million active users. The platform is an ideal place for independent musicians to showcase their music and gain recognition.

Full Creative Control

One of the most appealing aspects of releasing music without a label is the level of creative control it offers. Record labels often require artists to adhere to specific guidelines, from the type of music they create to the overall vision of their albums or singles. Independent artists can bypass these constraints by releasing their music directly to streaming platforms, enabling them to explore their creative side without compromise. Whether you're creating a unique sound or experimenting with new genres, being independent means you have the final say on your music.

When you share your single on platforms like Gaana, you decide what your track sounds like, how it’s marketed, and the overall branding that surrounds it. This freedom allows you to express yourself authentically, and it creates a more personal connection with your audience. By staying true to your artistic vision, you can attract listeners who resonate with your style and message.

Retaining More Revenue

Another compelling benefit of releasing music independently is the potential to retain a greater percentage of your revenue. Record labels typically take a significant portion of the income generated from music sales, streaming, and performances. This can leave independent artists with a small share of the profits. However, when you release music without a label, you have the freedom to keep most of the earnings.

On streaming platforms like Gaana, artists can receive royalties for the number of streams their music generates. While the payout per stream is relatively small, independent musicians benefit from keeping all of the royalties they earn. This can lead to a more sustainable income over time, especially if you build a loyal fanbase that continuously listens to your music.

Moreover, independent artists are in charge of their own promotional efforts, which means they can control their marketing budget. Instead of relying on a label’s marketing team, you can use social media, YouTube, and other platforms to market your music in a way that fits your budget. With the right strategies, independent artists can generate a significant amount of revenue and still have the freedom to control how they spend it.

Building a Direct Connection with Your Fans

One of the most exciting aspects of independent music releases is the opportunity to build a direct relationship with your fans. Without a record label acting as an intermediary, you can interact with your audience on a more personal level. This is made possible through social media platforms, email newsletters, and music streaming services.

By sharing your single on Gaana, you open the door to millions of listeners who may not have discovered your music otherwise. Gaana’s user-friendly interface allows fans to discover new artists, create playlists, and share their favorite tracks with others. As an independent artist, you can take advantage of this feature by engaging with your listeners and encouraging them to share your music with their own networks.

Furthermore, having direct access to your fanbase allows you to receive feedback, suggestions, and support from your audience. This can be invaluable as you continue to grow and develop as an artist. Fans appreciate when artists take the time to engage with them, and this connection can lead to long-term loyalty.

Expanding Your Reach

While it’s possible to release music independently on a small scale, platforms like Gaana give independent artists the opportunity to reach a vast audience. Gaana boasts millions of active users, and as an independent artist, you have the ability to tap into this large pool of potential listeners. By uploading your single to Gaana, you significantly increase your chances of being discovered.

Moreover, Gaana’s recommendation algorithms help users discover new music based on their listening habits. This means that even if your fans are not actively searching for new artists, your music has the potential to be recommended to them based on their preferences. With consistent releases and a growing catalog of music, your chances of being featured or included in curated playlists increase, expanding your exposure even further.

Conclusion

Releasing music without a label has numerous advantages, from maintaining creative control to retaining more revenue and building direct connections with fans. By choosing platforms like Gaana to share your music, you can tap into a massive audience and create a sustainable career on your own terms. If you're an independent artist looking to take control of your music career, Share your single on Gaana without a label and start building your brand today.

Embracing independence in the music industry may seem daunting at first, but the benefits are clear. With the right tools, a strong work ethic, and a passion for your craft, you can succeed without the need for a record label. So why not take the leap and see where your music can take you?

Related Articles:

For further reading, explore these related articles:

Share Your Single on Gaana with No Upfront Fees: A Comprehensive Guide

Why Gaana is the Perfect Platform for Your Single

Share Your Single on Gaana with 100% Royalties

Share Your Single on Gaana Without Paying Fees

For additional resources on music marketing and distribution, visit DMT Records Private Limited.

[beatverse1]

Maximizing Your Earnings: How to Submit Your Song on Spotify and Earn Money

The music industry has undergone a digital transformation, giving independent artists unprecedented opportunities to share their music with the world. Platforms like Spotify have leveled the playing field, making it easier than ever to reach a global audience and earn revenue from streams. If you're an artist looking to submit your song on Spotify and earn money, understanding the process is key to your success. With the right tools and strategies, like working with distribution platforms such as Deliver My Tune, you can make the most of Spotify’s vast reach.

The Importance of Submitting Your Song on Spotify

Spotify is one of the largest music streaming platforms, boasting over 500 million active users worldwide. Its extensive reach allows artists to connect with listeners from different parts of the globe, enabling them to grow their fan base while generating income. By submitting your music to Spotify, you are not just uploading a song but creating a revenue stream that rewards your talent and hard work.

The platform's user-friendly interface and features like personalized playlists and algorithm-driven recommendations mean that even lesser-known artists can gain visibility. This makes Spotify a must for musicians aiming to expand their reach and establish a career in the music industry.

Steps to Submit Your Song on Spotify

The process to submit your song on Spotify is straightforward, but it requires careful planning. Using a reliable digital distributor like Deliver My Tune simplifies the process significantly. Here’s how you can get started:

Select a Digital Distributor Spotify does not allow artists to upload songs directly. You need a distributor to act as a middleman. Deliver My Tune is a great option for independent artists, offering affordable and efficient services tailored to your needs.

Prepare Your Track and Metadata Ensure your song is ready for release. This includes mastering the track and organizing metadata such as title, artist name, and album art. Distributors like Deliver My Tune can guide you in meeting Spotify’s submission standards.

Upload Your Song to the Distributor Log into your distributor account, upload your song, and fill in all required details. Choose a release date and specify Spotify as one of your target platforms.

Use Spotify for Artists Once your music is live, claim your Spotify for Artists profile. This platform allows you to manage your artist profile, submit songs for playlist consideration, and track your performance metrics.

Strategies to Earn Money from Your Spotify Music

Submitting your music is just the first step. To earn money, you need to optimize your presence on the platform. Here’s how you can do it:

Increase Streams The more streams your songs receive, the higher your royalties. Promote your music on social media, collaborate with other artists, and ask fans to share your tracks.

Get on Playlists Spotify playlists are a powerful tool for discovery. Submit your track for playlist consideration via Spotify for Artists. Playlists can significantly boost your streams and visibility.

Engage Your Audience Connect with your listeners by sharing behind-the-scenes content, announcing new releases, and interacting with them on social media. This creates a loyal fan base more likely to support your music.

Monetize Beyond Streams Spotify allows artists to link to their merchandise and concert tickets. Take advantage of this feature to create additional revenue streams.

Why Choose Deliver My Tune for Spotify Distribution

For independent artists, the choice of a distributor can make all the difference. Deliver My Tune is an artist-centric platform that ensures your music reaches Spotify and other major streaming services seamlessly. Their cost-effective plans and personalized support make them a top choice for those looking to break into the music industry.

The platform also offers promotional tools to help you maximize your reach and earnings. With Deliver My Tune, you get more than just distribution; you gain a partner in your musical journey.

Making the Most of Spotify’s Features

Spotify offers several features to help artists succeed. One of these is the ability to view listener demographics and performance insights via Spotify for Artists. Use this data to tailor your promotional strategies and identify areas for improvement.

Another feature is the Artist Pick section, where you can highlight a track, playlist, or upcoming event. Utilize this space to draw attention to your latest release or collaborations.

Conclusion

Submitting your song on Spotify and earning money doesn’t have to be a complicated process. With platforms like Deliver My Tune simplifying distribution and Spotify providing tools for artist growth, you have all the resources you need to succeed. The key lies in understanding the platform, engaging with your audience, and consistently promoting your music.

If you’re ready to take your music career to the next level, start by submitting your song on Spotify today. The world is waiting to hear your talent—don’t keep it waiting.

Related Articles:

For further reading, explore these related articles:

Submit your song on Spotify step-by-step

Submit your song on Spotify easily

Submit your song on Spotify without a distributor

Submit your song on Spotify in 2025

For additional resources on music marketing and distribution, visit DMT RECORDS PRIVATE LIMITED.

[musicvalla]

How to License Your Lyrics: Earning from Your Words

As a songwriter, your lyrics hold immense creative and financial value. Whether you're just starting out or already established in the music industry, understanding how to sell your lyrics and license them to others can provide an additional stream of income and open doors to numerous opportunities. In this article, we will explore different ways you can sell your lyrics, how to license them for various purposes, and tips to ensure your songs reach the right people. We'll also integrate key concepts like Spotify nickname, song format, and Apple Music yearly subscription India into the discussion to guide your overall music journey.

What Does It Mean to Sell Your Lyrics?

Selling your lyrics is essentially the process of transferring the rights to your written words to another party, often a music producer, artist, or publisher, in exchange for a payment or royalties. It can involve selling the complete ownership of your lyrics or licensing them for specific uses, like album tracks, commercials, film soundtracks, or even viral social media content. The key is to understand the different options available to you and ensure you're getting compensated fairly for your work.

Platforms to Sell Your Lyrics

Several online platforms provide songwriters with the tools to sell and license their lyrics directly. Some of these platforms are tailored for independent songwriters, while others cater to more professional environments. Here are a few well-known options:

Music Publishing Companies One of the best ways to sell or license your lyrics is through a music publishing company. These organizations work to get your songs placed with artists, labels, and media outlets. They typically handle the legal aspects, ensuring that you receive the royalties you're owed.

Online Lyric Marketplaces Platforms like Songtradr, LyricFind, and Musicbed allow you to upload your lyrics and make them available for licensing. These platforms make it easier for songwriters to get their work discovered by artists, producers, and even businesses looking for music for commercials or films.

Direct Licensing to Artists If you have connections in the music industry or are looking for specific exposure, you can sell or license your lyrics directly to musicians. Many independent artists are always on the lookout for strong lyrics to pair with their music.

Self-Publishing via Streaming Services Once your lyrics are part of a recorded song, you can also distribute the entire song via music streaming platforms like Spotify or Apple Music. With tools like TuneCore or DistroKid, you can ensure your song is available worldwide, and every stream of your song generates royalties. In fact, if you're promoting your music on Spotify, consider crafting a unique Spotify nickname that helps fans easily find and recognize your tracks.

Why Licensing Your Lyrics is a Smart Move

Licensing your lyrics offers several advantages over simply selling them outright. When you license your lyrics, you retain ownership of the work, meaning you can continue earning royalties every time the song is used. Additionally, licensing allows you to license the same lyrics to multiple buyers, increasing your chances of earning from your creativity.

There are different types of licenses you can offer, depending on how the lyrics are going to be used:

Exclusive License: The buyer gets exclusive rights to your lyrics, and you can no longer license the song to anyone else. In exchange, you'll likely get a higher upfront payment.

Non-Exclusive License: The buyer gets the rights to use your lyrics, but you can still license them to other buyers. This type of license is more common for sync placements in media, such as movies, TV shows, and commercials.

Sole License: This is a hybrid license where the buyer gets exclusive rights for a period, but you can still use the lyrics for other purposes after the license term expires.

How Song Format Plays a Role in Selling Lyrics

Understanding song format is essential when selling or licensing your lyrics, as it directly affects how your lyrics fit into a song's overall structure. The most common song formats are based on the standard pop structure (verse-chorus-verse-chorus-bridge-chorus), but there are many variations depending on the genre.

Before selling or licensing your lyrics, it’s important to ensure that they align with the intended song format of the artist or producer who may be purchasing them. For instance, in a typical pop song, you may need to write a catchy hook for the chorus, while the verses will carry the story forward. Understanding the song format will help you structure your lyrics in a way that’s marketable and adaptable to various musical styles.

Managing Your Lyrics on Apple Music Yearly Subscription India

Once you’ve sold or licensed your lyrics and they’re included in a song that gets distributed through streaming platforms, it’s essential to manage your royalties effectively. In countries like India, where Apple Music yearly subscription India is becoming increasingly popular, the number of streams your song gets could result in significant royalties. Ensuring that your lyrics are registered properly with a performing rights organization (PRO) or through a distribution platform like TuneCore means you’ll get paid when your song is streamed.

For Indian songwriters, platforms like Apple Music offer access to millions of potential listeners, and your lyrics may end up in the ears of a global audience. The subscription fee may vary depending on the plan, but it's important to track your song’s performance across both Apple Music and Spotify to understand which platform is most profitable for your work.

Your Lyrics and Spotify Wrapped 2023

For those who have already distributed music through Spotify, one of the most exciting parts of the year is receiving your Spotify Wrapped 2023. This annual review provides insights into your most popular songs, playlists, and artists. If your lyrics have contributed to any popular tracks, this report can help you gauge how well your music is performing globally.

Understanding how listeners are interacting with your music gives you valuable data on which songs are resonating the most, allowing you to refine your songwriting style and increase your future earnings. If your song featuring your lyrics becomes a top-streamed track, your Spotify Wrapped summary will reflect this success, offering new opportunities for promotion and exposure.

Final Thoughts: Make Your Lyrics Work for You

Selling or licensing your lyrics is an exciting avenue for any songwriter, and with the right knowledge and tools, you can turn your written words into a sustainable revenue stream. Whether you're using platforms to license your lyrics or distributing your music on Apple Music and Spotify, understanding the role of song format, how to sell your lyrics, and how to leverage streaming services for exposure is crucial. By staying informed about trends like Spotify Wrapped 2023 and maximizing your presence on these platforms, you can position yourself for greater success in the music industry.

By thinking strategically about licensing and sales, you’ll not only expand your earning potential but also help bring your lyrical creations to a wider audience. So, get started, refine your craft, and let your lyrics work for you in the ever-evolving world of music!

[delivermytuneo6]

Challenges in Music Video Distribution Worldwide

The global music industry is vast and diverse, and the demand for music videos continues to grow across various platforms. However, despite the immense opportunities, distributing music videos worldwide comes with its own set of challenges. From technological barriers to cultural differences, artists and distributors must navigate a complex landscape to ensure their content reaches the right audiences. This article delves into the key challenges of music video distribution worldwide and offers potential strategies to address them.

1. Copyright and Licensing Issues

One of the most significant challenges in music video distribution worldwide is navigating copyright and licensing laws. Each country has its own regulations regarding intellectual property, which can complicate the distribution process. Unauthorized use of music, imagery, or content in a music video can lead to legal battles, hefty fines, and reputational damage.

For instance, platforms like YouTube employ Content ID systems to detect copyrighted material, which can result in videos being taken down or demonetized. However, this system is not foolproof and may flag content incorrectly. Artists and distributors need to ensure all rights—music, visuals, and performances—are properly secured and licensed before uploading their videos to global platforms.

2. Regional Restrictions and Censorship

Countries often impose restrictions on content based on cultural, political, or religious values. What might be acceptable in one country could be banned in another. For example, explicit content, LGBTQ+ themes, or political commentary may face censorship in certain regions. This creates a dilemma for artists who want to maintain creative freedom while reaching global audiences.

To address this, some artists produce multiple versions of their videos tailored to different markets. However, this approach can increase production costs and dilute the original vision of the work. Understanding the specific cultural and legal expectations of each target market is crucial for successful music video distribution worldwide.

3. Platform Algorithm Complexities

Digital platforms like YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram play a pivotal role in music video distribution worldwide, but their algorithms can pose a significant challenge. These algorithms prioritize content based on engagement metrics, such as likes, comments, shares, and watch time. This means that even high-quality videos can struggle to gain visibility without the right promotion strategy.

To overcome this, artists and distributors need to focus on optimizing their content for each platform. This includes using relevant tags, creating engaging thumbnails, and timing releases to coincide with peak activity periods. Additionally, collaborating with influencers and engaging directly with fans can boost visibility and improve algorithmic performance.

4. Monetization Struggles

While distributing music videos globally offers exposure, monetization remains a challenge. Platforms often generate revenue through ads, but artists only receive a fraction of these earnings. Furthermore, payment structures vary across platforms and regions, making it difficult to predict and maximize income.

Artists and labels can explore alternative monetization methods, such as sponsorship deals, exclusive content on subscription platforms like Patreon, or integrating product placements in their videos. These strategies can supplement traditional ad revenue and provide a more stable income stream.

5. Language and Cultural Barriers

Language and cultural differences can limit the reach of a music video. While English remains a dominant language in the music industry, non-English-speaking markets are growing rapidly. For instance, K-pop and Latin music have demonstrated that content in other languages can achieve massive global success.

To bridge this gap, artists can include subtitles or translations in their music videos, making them accessible to a broader audience. Additionally, collaborating with local artists or influencers can help build connections with regional markets, enhancing the effectiveness of music video distribution worldwide.

6. Piracy and Unauthorized Distribution

Piracy is a persistent issue in the digital age. Even with advanced anti-piracy measures, music videos are often copied and distributed on unauthorized platforms. This not only affects the artist's revenue but also undermines their control over their creative work.

To combat piracy, distributors must implement digital rights management (DRM) tools and work with trusted distribution platforms. Educating fans about the importance of supporting official releases can also help reduce unauthorized sharing.

7. High Competition

The sheer volume of content available online makes it difficult for individual music videos to stand out. Every day, thousands of new videos are uploaded, making the competition for audience attention fierce. Smaller artists often struggle to compete with well-funded projects backed by major labels.

Building a strong promotional strategy is essential to overcoming this challenge. Pre-release teasers, engaging social media campaigns, and partnerships with popular creators can help generate buzz and ensure a video reaches its target audience.

8. Technological Inequalities

While internet penetration is increasing globally, there are still significant disparities in access to high-speed internet. This limits the reach of music video distribution worldwide in regions where streaming large video files is impractical. Moreover, the digital divide disproportionately affects rural areas and developing countries, restricting access to content.

Artists can address this challenge by offering lower-resolution versions of their videos and distributing them on platforms optimized for slower internet speeds. Offline distribution methods, such as DVDs or USB drives, can also be considered for regions with limited connectivity.

9. Marketing and Promotion Costs

Effective global distribution requires substantial investment in marketing and promotion. Advertising campaigns, collaborations with influencers, and professional distribution services can be expensive, putting independent artists at a disadvantage.

To mitigate costs, artists can leverage organic growth strategies, such as engaging with fans on social media, using hashtags effectively, and participating in viral trends. Crowdfunding campaigns can also help raise funds for marketing efforts.

10. Keeping Up with Trends

The fast-paced nature of the digital world means that trends change quickly. What works today might not work tomorrow, making it challenging to maintain relevance. Platforms like TikTok thrive on short-lived trends, requiring artists to adapt constantly.

Staying informed about industry trends and audience preferences is essential. This involves monitoring analytics, participating in industry events, and collaborating with trend-savvy professionals who can guide distribution strategies.

Conclusion

While the challenges of music video distribution worldwide are significant, they are not insurmountable. By understanding the complexities of copyright laws, cultural sensitivities, platform algorithms, and monetization models, artists and distributors can devise effective strategies to navigate these hurdles. As technology continues to evolve, new opportunities for global distribution will emerge, making it possible for more artists to share their music videos with audiences around the world.

[snapchatfoljare]

The Positive Impact of Having Many Spotify Followers

In the world of music streaming, having a significant number of followers on Spotify is more than just a badge of honor; it's a powerful tool that can open doors to new opportunities, enhance visibility, and propel an artist's career. Here’s a look at the positive impacts of amassing a large following on Spotify.

1. Increased Visibility and Discoverability

With a large follower base, your music becomes more visible across the platform. Spotify’s algorithm takes note of popular artists with many followers, making it more likely to promote your tracks on playlists, recommended sections, and Spotify’s “Discover Weekly” feature. This means that a greater number of listeners can stumble upon your music, giving you access to audiences you may not have reached otherwise.

2. Boosts Credibility and Influence

A high follower count can significantly enhance an artist’s credibility. When potential fans or industry insiders see a large following, it signals that your music resonates with a considerable audience. This can open doors for collaborations, sponsorships, and other opportunities as people perceive you as a credible artist with influence in the music industry.

3. Enhances Engagement and Fan Loyalty

A loyal fan base doesn’t just listen to your music; they engage with your brand on a deeper level. Having a large number of followers on Spotify often translates to increased engagement, with more fans sharing your tracks, adding them to personal playlists, and discussing them on social media. This active fan base helps create a community around your music, fostering loyalty and making fans more likely to attend live events or buy merchandise.

4. Unlocks Monetization Opportunities

More followers can also lead to more streams, which directly translates into increased revenue. Spotify pays artists based on the number of streams they receive, so a larger following means a greater chance of consistent income from streaming. Additionally, a solid follower base can attract advertisers and brands looking to reach your audience, creating further opportunities for monetization through sponsorships and partnerships.

5. Increases Chances for Playlist Placements

One of the best ways to gain more listeners on Spotify is through playlist placements, especially on high-profile playlists curated by Spotify or popular influencers. With many followers, you’re more likely to capture the attention of playlist curators. This can lead to your music being featured on influential playlists, providing exposure to thousands or even millions of new listeners.

6. Fosters Industry Recognition and Growth

A large following on Spotify is a clear indicator of your success and potential as an artist. It demonstrates to record labels, managers, and booking agents that you have a loyal fan base, making you a more attractive prospect for record deals or event bookings. As industry professionals see your follower count rise, they’re more likely to recognize your potential, which can accelerate your growth within the industry.

7. Encourages Creative Freedom

When you have a substantial following on Spotify, you gain more freedom to experiment with your music. A dedicated fan base is more likely to support and embrace creative risks, giving you the confidence to evolve and explore new styles without worrying about losing your audience. This creative freedom can lead to a richer, more diverse catalog of music, strengthening your appeal and solidifying your place in the music world.

[watchworldlive]

Miss Rachel's Net Worth: How she rose to internet stardom

If you've got toddlerhood and its wants that never seem to end, you may have come across a YouTube sensation who goes by the name of Miss Rachel. This bubbly and interactive educator has got parents and children alike enthralled with her entertaining fun and educationally aimed videos especially made for little learners. However, amidst all the cheerful covers and vibrant videos, there comes one relevant question: What's Miss Rachel's net worth? Miss Rachel was not an overnight YouTube sensation, and her journey weaves just as much passion and persistence into the success.

The Story of Miss Rachel: A Passionate Early Childhood Educator

Miss Rachel (Rachel Griffin Accurso) is not just some YouTube personality who somehow drifted into overnight fame. She has always been a teacher who simply loved teaching the most immature learners. In fact, she comes from a background of early childhood education and music backed by a master's degree in music education-that is just the perfect foundation for entertaining and educational content.

From Teacher to YouTube Star

Like any other bright idea, Miss Rachel's journey began with a simple desire: to help children learn. She realized, then, there was a gap in content designed to educate early today in an engaging and high-quality manner, so she filled it. From a small project, it has developed into a full-fledged YouTube channel called "Songs for Littles," here where she posts original songs, interactive lessons, and developmental milestones for children. Her strategy? Make it fun, educational, and always pertinent to what toddlers need to develop and learn. This authentic connection with her audience was the secret sauce that led her to lightning-fast success.

How Miss Rachel Built Her Online Empire

But before we dive into the numbers, let's just talk about some numbers. Miss Rachel's net worth has become a much-discussed topic-and for good reason. As her channel viewership went through the roof, so did her revenues. So how does one build a financial empire on YouTube? Let's take a closer look at some of the key elements that have fed into Miss Rachel's impressive financial growth:

1. YouTube Ad Revenue

Most YouTubers' earnings are basically the backbone of their YouTube account, meaning ad revenue is their main source of income. As Miss Rachel gets millions of views per video, the chances for ads before and during her content increase significantly.

2. Brand Collaborations

The more popular Miss Rachel became, the more brand partnership opportunities she received. Her audience primarily consisted of young children, making her an easy find for educational toys and children's apps companies for collaborations, which is not a unique case with influencers like Miss Rachel.

3. Merchandise Sales

Miss Rachel has raised it to the next level by providing things other than just videos. She now provides educational materials, books and even kids merchandise branded with her content and diversified the income streams

4. Patreon and Supporter Contributions

Most of the creators also are receiving direct support from fans through Patreon. This means that Miss Rachel gets the creative control but at the same time gives the opportunity for her followers to contribute directly to her work

5. Sponsorships and Affiliates

Well, from product placements to affiliate links, Miss Rachel must be raking in a pretty decent chunk from sponsorships with kid-friendly brands. Every time she recommends a product on her channel, she probably stands to earn some form of commission whenever the viewers proceed to buy it using those links.

So, How Much is Miss Rachel's Net Worth?

While an exact figure is hard to ascertain, analysts reckon Miss Rachel's net worth is between $3 million to $5 million. These are estimated from her YouTube earnings, merchandise sales, and other brand deals that she has been taking advantage of. Not bad at all considering the background and origin of that project-an educational channel that started in a very simple form. However, above the payment, Miss Rachel's real value goes straight to the impact she has made on young children and their families. With a bubbly personality and an urgency to teach, she had made learning fun for thousands of toddlers across the globe-and that is priceless.

How This Success Impacts Miss Rachel's Approaches

A bright example of the impact of YouTubers is Miss Rachel. Her work is, in its essence, quite educational: she helps a child develop his language and social-emotional skills and even instills music habits. Here's why her success goes far beyond just net worth: Accessibility: Miss Rachel's videos are absolutely free on YouTube, making quality education accessible to everybody.

Parental Appreciation: Parents would praise the fact that her videos have been assisting children in learning important critical developmental skills, foremost among which is speech and language. Building Community: On her warm and friendly personality, Miss Rachel has created a great online community where parents and kids feel connected.

Conclusion

In the main, her brand has actually come to represent learning, fun, and quality time for families. Miss Rachel's net worth may be significant, but it is the heart and soul she puts into the work itself. From being small-town natives to all of a sudden becoming a YouTube sensation, she has changed the way young children learn with music and play. And although financial success is noteworthy, the smiles on kids' faces and the gratitude of parents really outline her legacy. The next time you watch one of her videos with the little one, remember behind every catchy tune and a great lesson sat a woman who turned passion into a global empire. That's the journey that it has been!

[douchebagbrainwaves]

ECONOMIC INEQUALITY AND MONEY

One way to guess how far an idea extends is to ask yourself at what point you'd bet against it. But in practice that never happens. Could you reproduce Silicon Valley, the single best thing they could do might be to create a special visa for startup founders to be any syntax for it. Whereas when you're big you can maltreat them at will, and you just create Carnegie-Mellon? The real problem is the way you do releases. In the earliest stage. And so you can't begin with a statement, but with a question. A round for, say, deals to buy real estate.1 Ideally you want to take a shot at describing where these trends are leading. For example, everyone I've talked to while writing this essay felt the same about English classes—that anything can be interesting if you get growth, everything else tends to fall into place.2

It's hard to say why Yahoo felt threatened. About a year ago she was alarmed to receive a letter from Apple, offering her a discount on a new feature, they'd be able to get the resulting ideas past other people's. Is whether we can keep things this way. So there are a few cases where this isn't true: the urls at the bottom. The reason I describe this as a danger is that series A investors often make companies take more money than they want. There are two big forces driving change in startup funding: it's becoming cheaper to start. Whereas if you want to find surprises you should do the opposite. And yet it also happened that Carter was famous for his big grin and folksy ways, and Ford for being a boring klutz. It might be true that increased variation in income is a sign of something you need to write anything, though? In that kind of space. What does that mean in practice? And finally, if a good investor has committed to fund you if you stay where you are.

The right thing to compare Lisp to is not 1950s hardware, but you don't have to worry about that. 9199 Free 0. The constraints that limit ordinary companies also protect them. Now founders would prefer to sell less, and VCs are digging in their heels because they're not directly exposed to competitive pressure: a salesman has to deal with clients could be enough to put you over the edge. So is it coming out of later stage investors?3 We get startups airborne. Who pays the legal bills for this deal? Most of them myself included are more comfortable dealing with abstract ideas than with people. If the movie industry could have any law they wanted, where would they stop?4 After trying the demo, signing up for the service should require nothing more than filling out a brief form the briefer the better. Not all the people who work there.

But it was not technology but math, and math doesn't get stale. So who is our 7% coming out of later stage investors have no problem with that. It's not just that if you let Henry Ford get rich, or you've failed. And it's natural that the new version was available immediately. When is Java better and when is C? In 1800, people could not see as readily as we can that a great fortune with no apparent cause was probably due to a nearby fan. In the early 1990s I read an article in which someone said that software was a subscription business.

The angel investor cheerfully surrenders his board seat. We were terrified of starting a company, why not start the type with the most basic question: will the future be better or worse than the 20th best player, causing him not to make the team, and if Microsoft doesn't control the client, they can't push users towards their server-based software, they will be facing not just technical problems but their own wishful thinking. It makes a better story, partly because there is so little time before Demo Day, because Demo Day presentations are now so short that they rarely include much if any demo. In a way it's a relief to get some message past network-level filters if they want to invest and offers the founders a term sheet, ask how many of their last 10 term sheets turned into deals. If a company wants to make a silicon valley; you let one grow. In addition to working in their space, you were supposed to fight back, and there was no such thing as a freelance programmer. A company has to be inexpensive and well-designed.

The hard part about figuring out what people want, deciding how much to how many voters, and adjust their message so precisely in response, that they tend to split the difference and say that they wanted yellow. So anything we could do to decrease the false positive rate at the expense of the filtering rate. I found out why. Part of the problem is that big projects tend to grow into a big company of mediocre ones, where bad ideas are caught by committees instead of the people who run them. In a way.5 Surely everyone realizes that was just a fast-growing companies overspend on different things. As for building something users love, and make more than you are. Starting one is at first no more than a town with the right personality. In fact, shelving an idea probably even inhibits new ideas: as you start to get mixed together with the spin you've added to get them to give you bigger abstractions—bigger bricks, as it were, so you must. When I give a draft of an essay. One thing we can say for sure is that there is nothing in spam-of-the-future must be low, or everyone would be doing it.

The fascinating thing about optimizing for growth is that it can be updated without confusing the users. Occam's Razor implies, is the sort of things we now patent as software, but it's never going to go anywhere, and yet did things no mainframe software could do. I got about 1750 spams. Lisp.6 The cows apparently learn to stay away from them, and judged them less by what they said than who wrote them; a magazine might publish a story by an unknown writer if it was good, so I can answer for both. I want to say explicitly that I am not surprised to hear it. I was interested in being a technologist in residence. Immigration difficulties might be another reason to stay put.7 The centralizing effect of venture firms is a double one: they cause startups to form around them, and those who make more money than they have in the past.8 It looks as if server-based software is that a company won because its founders were so smart. But most types of work that depend more on talent are always more admirable. Because seed firms are companies rather than individual people, reaching them is easier than reaching angels.

Notes

I talk about real income statistics calculated in the production of high school as a game, you don't mind taking money from the study. The other reason it's easy to slide into thinking that customers want what you launch with, you might be 20 or 30 times as much effort on sales. Peter Norvig found that three quarters of them. One sign of the increase in economic inequality is really about poverty.

You won't always get a lot like meaning. Microsoft discourages employees from contributing to open-source but seems to be considered an angel investment from a mediocre VC. The state of technology, so the best case. Obvious is an instance of a type of lie.

A related trick is to start software companies constrained in b. I've come to writing essays is to hand off the task at hand almost does this for you by accidents of age and geography, rather than ones they capture. According to a woman who, because the danger of chasing large investments is not that everyone's the same way a bibilical literalist is committed to rejecting it.

This essay was written before Firefox.

We didn't swing for the same energy and honesty that fifteenth century artists did, but I couldn't believe it or not.

This was made particularly clear in our case, as on a wall is art. While the first third of the most powerful men in Congress, Sam Altman wrote: After the war, tax receipts as a company just to steal the company goes public.

There are lots of search engines. Apparently the mall was not drinking that kool-aid at the end of the lies we tell kids are smarter than preppies, just try to get all the difference between good and bad measurers. Which OS?

My first job was scooping ice cream in the sort of Gresham's Law of conversations. To track down. But it is unfair when someone gets drunk instead of profits—but only because he had more fun in this, but I think is happening when you use the wrong side of the scholar.

[kisjuhaszeliza97]

Eye Tracking: What's the difference between the eye of Big Brother and the camera [for reflection]?

Hi #BigBrother fans! As I wrote before, Big Brother will return to Hungary after 21 years off the air, this time with a brand new (kid-friendly) season, i.e. season 3, and a new eye logo (which is using this title in the Netherlands and Belgium since 2021). Now we will tell you, but what is the difference between the Eye of Big Brother and the camera, if the camera reflecting the Eye of Big Brother with gaze tracking, macro view. Close your eyes and remember the beautiful legendary reality show 'Big Brother'!

Reminder: We're going between July and August 2002, TV2 aired another Big Brother trailer in the promo, when the camera looks from close up with a macro view (with camera reflection), the all-seeing beautiful eye of Big Brother is tracking the light and shut it off from the outside world.

The human eye (oculus humanus) is the sensory organ of vision in the human body, which is used to perceive the rays of light coming from environmental objects - emanating from them or reflected from them - and with its optical system it maps their shape, spatial position and color.

By analogy with the optical system of cameras, the eye has a simple, two-part converging lens type objective. The outside is the cornea, the inside is the lens. The iris, which also determines the color of the eye, reduces the amount of light entering the eye. The opening of the iris is the pupil, the diameter of which changes depending on the light intensity, and plays the role of the aperture. The incoming light rays pass through the vitreous body (corpus vitreum) and are focused on the retina. The image is the formed with the help of the central nervous system.

The iris is a flat plate with the function of a light aperture, whose light-transmitting opening (round in humanus, with a average diameter of 4 millimeteres) is the pupil (the rarely used Hungarian name for which is 'eye bug'). It is attatched to the anterior, looser part of the conjuctiva (spongiosa sclerae) with a fine connective tissue fiber system. The basis of the iris is a fine connective tissue, in which there are two opposing smooth muscles, the pupil constrictor muscles (musculus sprinter iridis (pupillae)) and the pupil dilator muscle (musculus dilator pupillae). They carry out the narrowing and dilating reactions of the pupil's adaptation to the light and other reflexes (accommodation reflex). The front surface of the iris shows a fold characteristic of the given individual. The color of the iris is determined by the number, pigment content and arrangement of the cells containing the dye (pigment) in it. They are basically influenced by hereditary factors (see eye color). It receives its double (sympathetic and parasympathetic) innervation from the autonomic nervous system. A sympathetic predominance causes the pupil to dilate, while a parasympathetic predominance contricts.

The pupil - rarely called 'the eye bug' in Hungarian - is the opening on the iris, which is round in humans, in the central part of the iris, a special flat formation of the choroid. Its role is essentially the same as that of the aperture, so it makes the image projected on the retina sharper and brighter.

At night, when a person sleeps most deeply, the pupils narrow significantly. According to researchers at the University of Geneva, this narrowing of the pupils is directly related to the area of the brain responsible for memory. According to their assumption, the closing of pupils means a kind of extra protection for the brain against the effects of external light, which could disrupt the process of recording and processing memories.

The iris contains pigment cells that determine the color of the eye. The specific muscles in it - some of which are of epithelial origin - are used to widen and narrow the pupil, which regulates the amount of light entering the eye, thus helping the eye to adapt to changing light conditions.

Its innervation is dual and originates from the autonomic nervous system. Excitation of the sympathetic nervous system leads to dilation of the pupil, while parasympathetic excitation leads to contriction of the pupil. These effects also occur when appropriate medications are used. The pupil can't be neglected from a cosmetic point of view either - which is completely justified - but sometimes the ladies were also able to do very harmful things (to themselves!) (e.g. pupil-dilating drugs).

Due to the double innervation, the dilation or constriction of the pupil is a good indivation of many processes taking place in humans. By dilating, the pupil reacts to, for example, strong positive emotions, sexual excitement, pain or intense brain activity. It narrows down to negative emotions, disgust, disgust or brain overload. These signals are known and used by many diciplines, from psychology to marketing.

Camera is a name derived from the Latin term camera obscura, which is used in the Hungarian sense of film recorder and video camera, but more recently, under the influence of English, it is also used as the name of camera.

A video camera is a structure consisting of optical lenses and a light-protected part. Through a shutter, the lenses project an image onto a recording surface, which electronically transmits/stores the incoming light. Here, the recording can be done analogically or digitally. Their resolution is still well below that of traditional cameras, but this will probably change in a few years.

The camera is structure consisting of optical lenses and a light-protected part. The lenses project an image onto a mounting surface through a shutter mechanisim. With a word of Latin origin, it is also called a camera. Analog cameras are only suitable for recording still images, but digital cameras can also record moving images, i.e. they also function as video cameras.

Most cameras record the image in the range of light perceptible to the human eye, but some special machines and photographers using special film are able to record images from the invisible range as well.

Any plate made of transparent material (usually glass or plastic), bounded by two spherical surfaces or a spherical surface and a plane, and influencing light rays in a directed manner, is called an optical lens. Lenses can basically be convex or concave. Convex lenses are those that are thicker in the center than át the edges; if the material of the lens is optically denser than that of the environment, these are also called collecting lenses. Convex lenses (spread lenses), on the other hand, are thicker at the edges.

Both converging and diverging lenses form an image of objects. These images can be real or apparent. As an objects moves along its axis, it moves closer or further away from the lens. If the object approaches the lens, the image moves in the same direction, i.e. the mapped image moves away from the lens. In the case of a collecting lens, six characteristic ray paths can be distinguished in the optics. The discussion of the case applicable to the collector lens can be seen in the attatched picture.

Let's go back to the human eye, the eye lens (lens oculi) is bioconvex, transparent optical lens, diameter 9 millimeters, thickness 4.5 millimeters, the convexity of its front surface is smaller, and the convexity of its back surface is greater. The edge connecting the two surfaces is rounded. It is formed by modified, highly elongated epithelial cells. It is covered by a transparent membrane, the lens (capsula lentis). In its stock, a more gelatinous cortex (cortex lentis) and a denser core (nucleus lentis) can be distinguished.

The discovery of eye tracking is linked to the name of the French ophthalmologist Emile Javal (1878). Javal observed the movement of the eyes while reading and noticed that the eyes do not continuously along the lines, but in small jumps (per saccade), and intermediate fixations can be observed during the jumps.

Eye tracking enables the measurement of eye movements, eye positions and gaze points through various technological processes. In other words, eye tracking identifies and monitors a person's visual attention to location, objects, and duration.

After 21 years off the air, Big Brother will return to Hungary, this time with a brand new (kid-friendly) season, if a water fairy falls asleep on his pupil in the World Inside the Eye of Big Brother, she will dream big and shut it off from the outside world.

Are you waiting for the revival of Big Brother Hungary, this time with a brand new (kid-friendly) season? Read and tracking this text with your eyes!

"See yourself with your beautiful fairy eyes! Big Brother - It's in our eyes. Kids are waiting too." [Ophthalmologically tested] 👁️

PLEASE REBLOG THIS ARTICLE NOW!

[oediex]

IGN posted their video review of Hogwarts Legacy. They added the following pinned comment:

"The elephant in the room with Hogwarts Legacy is Harry Potter’s creator, J.K. Rowling, whose comments about transgender people in recent years have left a sour taste in the mouths of many current and former Potter fans, both at IGN and in the world at large. This has driven some to call for a boycott of the Wizarding World altogether – including Hogwarts Legacy, though Rowling was not directly involved and there are good reasons (both in-game and out) to believe the developers at Avalanche don’t necessarily share her views. Regardless, IGN has always and will continue to champion human rights causes and support people speaking with their wallets in whatever manner they choose. As critics, our job is to answer the question of whether or not we find Hogwarts Legacy to be fun to play and why; whether it’s ethical to play is a separate but still very important question. So just as in virtually all cases, we’re choosing to expose and address the views of the franchise creator separately from our consideration of the work of the hundreds of game developers and evaluate Hogwarts Legacy as it stands, leaving behind-the-scenes context to be considered in addition to that evaluation, rather than in place of it, so that it can be weighted according to your own values."

While it's nice that they add this, it misses the fact that even if Rowling wasn't directly involved in the making of the game, she is still profiting off it. It's great that they're adding this comment, and I'm sure there are trans people working at IGN, so how could they not + the backlash they would have gotten if they hadn't added it, but clearly the stronger move would have been not to review it at all.

Anyway, the comments are absolute garbage, ranging from "who asked" to "nobody cares", "successfully ignored" to "stay out of politics". The most gross comments are obviously those that state that "some of us agree with jk" and "Rowling said nothing wrong".

I don't mean to make this post to get people depressed (though it is very depressing) but to reiterate that if you stand with trans people, then you boycot this game. I know it's Harry Potter. I know for many of us it hits that sweet spot of childhood nostalgia x self-indulging activity (gaming). But if you buy this game, then you are giving money to a very influential woman who has time and again shown herself to be deeply transphobic; who mingles with many other transphobes and homophobes, as well as people who themselves are involved with anti-abortion, far-right organisations; and don't forget that Rowling will use her money to donate to political campaigns, such as when she donated 1 million pounds to Scotland's anti-independence campaign, the side that won the referendum, with the conservative British government only last month blocking a Scottish bill that would make it easier for trans people to change their legal gender.

It doesn't matter that the makers of Hogwarts Legacy have distanced themselves from Rowling, it doesn't matter that they have included a trans background character or that you can make your own trans character in the character creator - if you buy this game, you are giving money to this woman. She WILL receive royalties from this game as it is based on her intellectual property.

"Rowling consistently makes passive income on all Harry Potter products. Multiple sources have cited that Rowling earns anywhere between $50 million to a $100 million each year from royalties. Forbes estimated she earned $95 million in 2017 alone."

Relevant YouTube images under the cut

[officevalle]

Turn Your Remix Skills into Cash on iTunes

The world of music has seen an incredible transformation, thanks to digital platforms that give artists the tools to share their work and earn from it. Remixing, once considered a hobby for DJs and producers, has now become a viable way to make money in the music industry. If you're wondering how to turn your passion into profit, releasing your remix on iTunes to get paid is a fantastic starting point. This comprehensive guide will walk you through the steps, strategies, and techniques to maximize your earnings and establish yourself as a remix artist.

Why Remixes Are More Popular Than Ever

The Rise of Remix Culture The popularity of remixes has skyrocketed over the past decade. Listeners are drawn to fresh interpretations of their favorite songs, whether it’s a dance remix of a pop hit or a mellow acoustic twist on an upbeat track. Remixes appeal to diverse audiences and often attract fans from multiple genres. Platforms like iTunes have made it possible for artists to monetize these creative reinterpretations and reach millions of music lovers worldwide.

Why Listeners Are Willing to Pay for Remixes

Consumers value remixes for their creativity and originality. A well-produced remix can breathe new life into a track, turning it into a completely different listening experience. This is why remixes often chart on music platforms alongside original songs. For remix artists, this demand translates into a golden opportunity to showcase talent while earning income.

Securing Rights to Your Remix

Understanding Copyright Laws Before you release your remix on iTunes, it’s essential to secure the rights to the original song. Copyright laws protect the intellectual property of the original creators, meaning you can’t simply remix a track and sell it without permission. This is an important step to ensure your work complies with legal standards and avoids disputes.

Steps to Obtain Permission

Identify the Copyright Holder: This is often the original artist, their record label, or a music publisher.

Contact the Holder: Reach out to request permission to create and distribute your remix.

Negotiate Terms: Some rights holders may ask for a percentage of your earnings or a flat fee.

Secure a License: Once terms are agreed upon, ensure you receive a written agreement that outlines your rights and responsibilities.

Perfecting Your Remix for Digital Distribution

Polishing Your Sound To release your remix on iTunes to get paid, your track must meet high production standards. Quality matters, as listeners are more likely to pay for professionally produced music. Invest in top-notch mixing and mastering to ensure your remix sounds polished and radio-ready.

File Format and Metadata iTunes requires specific file formats, typically WAV or AAC, for music uploads. Additionally, metadata is crucial for searchability and proper categorization. Include the song title, artist name, remix version, and any other relevant details in the metadata to ensure your track is easily discoverable.

Choosing the Right Cover Art Your remix's visual presentation is just as important as the music. Eye-catching cover art can grab attention and encourage potential listeners to explore your track. Use professional design tools or hire a graphic designer to create artwork that reflects the vibe of your remix.

Navigating the Distribution Process

Selecting a Distributor Independent artists can’t upload music directly to iTunes; instead, they need a distributor. Services like TuneCore, CD Baby, and DistroKid act as intermediaries, helping artists get their music onto platforms like iTunes, Spotify, and Apple Music. Compare distributors based on fees, royalties, and ease of use to find the best fit for your needs.

Setting Up Your Release Once you’ve chosen a distributor, upload your track along with the necessary details. Set a release date to give yourself time to promote your remix before it goes live. This preparation can build anticipation and lead to higher sales.

Maximizing Earnings with Strategic Pricing Pricing your remix strategically is key to maximizing earnings. While some artists opt for low prices to attract more buyers, others set premium rates to reflect the quality of their work. Consider your target audience and competition when determining the price point for your remix.

Boosting Visibility on iTunes

Climbing the Charts Visibility is everything when releasing your remix on iTunes to get paid. Tracks that rank higher on the iTunes charts attract more attention and downloads. To climb the charts, focus on generating early sales and streams. Encourage your fans to pre-order or purchase your track as soon as it’s released.

Using Social Media to Drive Traffic Leverage platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter to promote your remix. Share teasers, behind-the-scenes footage, and engaging posts to generate excitement. Partnering with influencers or running targeted ads can also amplify your reach.

Collaborations as a Growth Strategy Collaborating with other artists, DJs, or influencers can help you expand your audience. Joint releases often attract fans from both parties, increasing visibility and revenue potential. Look for collaborators whose style complements your own for maximum impact.

Engaging Your Audience for Long-Term Success

Building a Loyal Fanbase Fans are more likely to support artists who engage with them. Respond to comments, host live Q&A sessions, and create content that resonates with your audience. A loyal fanbase can turn into a steady source of income through repeat purchases and word-of-mouth promotion.

Offering Exclusive Content Consider offering exclusive content, such as extended mixes, remixes of popular tracks, or limited-edition merchandise, to incentivize fans to support you further. Platforms like Patreon or Bandcamp can complement your iTunes income by providing additional revenue streams.

Conclusion

Releasing your remix on iTunes to get paid is a rewarding journey that combines creativity with business acumen. From securing rights and perfecting your track to navigating distribution and marketing, every step plays a crucial role in your success. By following these strategies and staying consistent, you can turn your remixing passion into a sustainable career.

Are you ready to release your first remix on iTunes? Share your thoughts or ask questions in the comments below—we’d love to hear about you

Related Articles:

For further reading, explore these related articles:

How to Release Your Remix on iTunes to Get Exposure

How to Release Your Remix on All Streaming Platforms for Free

How to Release Your Remix on All Streaming Platforms in India

How to Release Your Remix on All Streaming Platforms Globally

For additional resources on music marketing and distribution, visit DMT Records Private Limited.

[dmtrecordspvtltd]

Independent Musicians and Spotify: The Best Way to Keep 100% of Your Royalties

The music industry has seen rapid changes over the last few decades, particularly with the rise of streaming platforms. While Spotify remains one of the most popular platforms for music distribution, artists are often faced with the challenge of retaining as much of their revenue as possible. In a landscape where intermediaries and streaming services take a significant share of royalties, finding ways to maximize earnings is crucial for independent musicians. One of the most beneficial ways to do this is by choosing to share your track on Spotify with 100% royalties.

This opportunity allows artists to avoid the usual deductions that come from traditional distribution methods and ensures they keep the full earnings from their streams. If you are an independent musician looking to distribute your music without giving up a large percentage of your royalties, this could be the perfect option for you.

Understanding Royalties and How Spotify Pays Artists

Before diving into the benefits of sharing your track on Spotify with 100% royalties, it’s important to understand how royalties work on Spotify. The streaming platform pays artists based on the number of streams their songs generate. However, the payment process often involves several intermediaries, including record labels and distribution services. These parties take a portion of the royalties, which means the artist receives only a fraction of the total revenue.

Traditionally, music distribution platforms offer different royalty structures. Some may provide the artist with a 70% royalty share, while others might offer less. While this may seem like a fair deal, many independent musicians feel that they deserve to retain the entirety of their earnings, especially considering the amount of effort they put into creating and promoting their music.

When you opt to share your track on Spotify with 100% royalties, you eliminate the need for intermediaries and ensure that every stream contributes directly to your earnings. This model empowers musicians by allowing them to take full control of their income.

The Importance of Full Royalties for Independent Musicians

Independent musicians have more opportunities than ever to make a name for themselves, but they also face unique challenges. Many artists do not have the financial backing or industry connections that traditional record labels offer. As a result, they must rely on platforms like Spotify to promote and distribute their music. However, the lack of industry support often means that they have fewer resources for marketing and promotion.

Keeping 100% of the royalties from their streams can significantly impact an artist’s financial situation. For emerging artists, the difference between receiving 70% or 100% of royalties can be substantial. The extra earnings can go a long way in helping them invest in the next phase of their music career, whether that means creating new tracks, funding music videos, or promoting their work on social media.

In addition, retaining full control over royalties gives artists more flexibility and freedom to experiment with their music. Without worrying about giving up a large portion of their income, musicians can focus on crafting their unique sound and building a strong connection with their fans.

How to Share Your Track on Spotify with 100% Royalties

The process of sharing your track on Spotify with 100% royalties is simpler than you might think. There are now several platforms that offer this service, allowing independent musicians to distribute their music directly to Spotify without giving up a significant portion of their earnings. One such platform provides musicians with the opportunity to distribute their music and retain all of their royalties. By signing up with a distribution service that offers 100% royalties, you can take advantage of this incredible opportunity.

To share your track on Spotify with 100% royalties, you’ll first need to create an account with a digital music distributor that supports this model. Once your music is uploaded and ready for distribution, the platform will send your tracks to Spotify and other major streaming services, ensuring that your royalties are paid directly to you.

To get started, you can read more about this opportunity here, where you’ll find detailed instructions on how to share your music and retain 100% of the royalties.

The Advantages of 100% Royalties for Your Music Career

There are numerous benefits to sharing your track on Spotify with 100% royalties. First and foremost, it ensures that you are not losing money through distribution fees or royalty cuts. In an industry where every cent counts, retaining your full earnings is incredibly valuable. This financial independence enables you to invest more in your music and sustain your creative output.

Another advantage is the opportunity for greater control over your career. Without relying on record labels or distribution companies, you have the freedom to make decisions based on your vision rather than financial constraints. You can choose how to market your music, which platforms to focus on, and even how to engage with your fans.

Moreover, keeping 100% of your royalties encourages greater engagement with your audience. As an independent artist, it’s important to build a loyal fan base, and when your supporters see that you are fully invested in your music and your earnings, they are more likely to support you through purchases, streams, and concert attendance.

Final Thoughts on Independent Music Distribution with 100% Royalties

In today’s music industry, independent artists have more opportunities to take control of their careers than ever before. By opting to share your track on Spotify with 100% royalties, you can ensure that you retain the full financial benefits of your hard work. This distribution model is a game-changer for emerging musicians looking to break through on a global platform like Spotify.

If you’re ready to take control of your royalties and share your music with the world, consider using a distribution service that allows you to keep 100% of your earnings. This is one step toward achieving financial independence as an artist and building a sustainable music career.

Learn more about how to start sharing your track on Spotify with 100% royalties by visiting the full article here.

Related Articles:

For further reading, explore these related articles:

Share Your Track on Spotify Without Paying Fees

How to Share Your Track on Spotify Across Multiple Platforms Effortlessly

How to Share Your Track on Spotify to Get Paid: A Complete Guide

Share Your Track on Spotify to Get Exposure

For additional resources on music marketing and distribution, visit DMT Records Private Limited.