#onshore manufacturing
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Onshore vs. Offshore: Which is Better for Australian Brands?
Australian fashion brands face a crucial decision: should they manufacture garments onshore in Australia or offshore in countries like China and Vietnam? Onshore manufacturing offers advantages like better quality control, faster turnaround times, and sustainability. It’s ideal for high-end brands that value "Made in Australia" quality. However, offshore production presents significant cost savings, especially for large-volume orders, making it a more viable option for B2B and fast-fashion brands.
At Deepwear, we help Australian brands make informed decisions by connecting them with reliable manufacturers. Whether you're seeking cost-effective offshore options or premium onshore production, our team ensures ethical practices, quality control, and optimized logistics to support your brand's growth.
#onshore and offshore#onshore in australia#onshore manufacturing#offshore production#australian fashion brands
0 notes
Text
Onshore Wind Turbine(Above 2.5MW) Market Outlook, Demand, Benefits, Insights 2017 – 2032
Overview:
The onshore wind turbine market refers to the industry that involves the development, manufacturing, and installation of wind turbines with a capacity of 2.5MW or higher on land. These turbines are designed to harness the power of wind to generate electricity.
The onshore wind turbine market has experienced significant growth over the past decade due to increasing concerns about climate change, the need for renewable energy sources, and advancements in wind turbine technology. Onshore wind power is considered one of the most cost-effective and widely available sources of renewable energy.
Onshore Wind Turbine Market to surpass USD 19 billion by 2032 from USD 10.1 billion in the year 2022 at a CAGR of 7.8% throughout the forecast period 2022-32.
Industry Analysis:
The onshore wind turbine industry has become highly competitive with the participation of several key players. These companies are involved in various stages of the value chain, including turbine manufacturing, project development, and installation.
Revenue:
The revenue generated by the onshore wind turbine market has been steadily increasing. The exact figures may vary depending on the specific time period and geographic region considered. According to Stringent Datalytics reports, the global onshore wind power market was valued at around $60 billion in 2020 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 10% from 2021 to 2028.
Demand: The demand for onshore wind turbines has been steadily increasing due to several factors, including the global shift towards renewable energy sources, government incentives and policies supporting wind energy, and the growing awareness of environmental sustainability.
Key Trends:
Increased Turbine Size: One key trend in the onshore wind turbine market is the development of larger and more efficient turbines. Manufacturers are designing turbines with higher capacity and longer blades to capture more wind energy, increasing overall energy production.
Digitalization and Data Analytics: The industry is embracing digitalization and the Internet of Things (IoT) to improve the performance and maintenance of wind turbines. Data analytics and predictive maintenance techniques are being used to reduce downtime and enhance operational efficiency.
Hybrid Systems: Another trend is the integration of wind turbines with energy storage solutions, such as batteries. This allows for more consistent power generation and grid stability, making wind energy more reliable.
Local Manufacturing: To reduce costs and increase market competitiveness, some regions are emphasizing local manufacturing of wind turbine components, creating job opportunities and reducing transportation costs.
Sustainability and Recycling: Manufacturers are focusing on sustainability by developing recyclable materials for turbine components and exploring options for recycling and repurposing decommissioned turbines.
Products:
In the onshore wind turbine market, there are various types and designs of wind turbines. The choice of product depends on factors like wind conditions, available space, and project budget. Common types of onshore wind turbines include:
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines (HAWTs): These are the most common type of onshore wind turbines, with blades that rotate around a horizontal axis. They are suitable for a wide range of wind speeds and are available in various sizes.
Vertical Axis Wind Turbines (VAWTs): VAWTs have blades that rotate around a vertical axis. They are often used in urban or constrained spaces and have unique design advantages.
Direct Drive Turbines: These turbines eliminate the need for a gearbox, reducing maintenance requirements and increasing reliability.
Geared Turbines: Geared turbines use a gearbox to increase the rotation speed of the generator. They are known for their efficiency and are often used in larger turbines.
Opportunities:
Market Growth: The global demand for renewable energy is expected to continue growing, providing significant opportunities for the onshore wind turbine market.
Emerging Markets: Developing countries are increasingly investing in wind energy, presenting new markets for turbine manufacturers and developers.
Technological Advancements: Continued innovation in turbine design, materials, and manufacturing processes presents opportunities to improve efficiency and reduce costs.
Collaboration and Partnerships: Collaborating with energy storage companies, grid operators, and government agencies can lead to integrated solutions and project opportunities.
Repowering: Upgrading and repowering older wind farms with newer, more efficient turbines is a growing market segment.
Offshore Expansion: While this focuses on onshore wind turbines, some manufacturers are exploring opportunities in the offshore wind market, which is expanding rapidly.
Sustainability Focus: Companies that prioritize sustainability in their operations and products are likely to attract environmentally conscious consumers and investors.
We recommend referring our Stringent datalytics firm, industry publications, and websites that specialize in providing market reports. These sources often offer comprehensive analysis, market trends, growth forecasts, competitive landscape, and other valuable insights into this market.
By visiting our website or contacting us directly, you can explore the availability of specific reports related to this market. These reports often require a purchase or subscription, but we provide comprehensive and in-depth information that can be valuable for businesses, investors, and individuals interested in this market.
“Remember to look for recent reports to ensure you have the most current and relevant information.”
Click Here, To Get Free Sample Report: https://stringentdatalytics.com/sample-request/onshore-wind-turbine%EF%BC%88above-2-5mw)-market/4331/
Market Segmentations:
Global Onshore Wind Turbine(Above 2.5MW) Market: By Company
• Vestas
• Ghrepower
• GE Energy
• Goldwind
• Siemens Gamesa
• ENESSERE SRL
• S&W Energy Systems
• HY Energy
• Ming Yang
• Envision
• Windey
• Dongfang
• CSSC
• Primus Wind Power
• Eocycle
• Nordex
• Bergey Wind Power
• Northern Power Systems
• Tozzi Nord Srl
• Xzeres Wind
Global Onshore Wind Turbine(Above 2.5MW) Market: By Type
• Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
• Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
Global Onshore Wind Turbine(Above 2.5MW) Market: By Application
• Below 3 MW
• 3-4 MW
• Above 4 MW
Global Onshore Wind Turbine(Above 2.5MW) Market: Regional Analysis
All the regional segmentation has been studied based on recent and future trends, and the market is forecasted throughout the prediction period. The countries covered in the regional analysis of the Global Onshore Wind Turbine(Above 2.5MW) market report are U.S., Canada, and Mexico in North America, Germany, France, U.K., Russia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, and Rest of Europe in Europe, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, China, Japan, India, South Korea, Rest of Asia-Pacific (APAC) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa (MEA) as a part of Middle East and Africa (MEA), and Argentina, Brazil, and Rest of South America as part of South America.
Visit Report Page for More Details: https://stringentdatalytics.com/reports/onshore-wind-turbine%EF%BC%88above-2-5mw)-market/4331/
Reasons to Purchase Onshore Wind Turbine(Above 2.5MW) Market Report:
• To obtain insights into industry trends and dynamics, including market size, growth rates, and important factors and difficulties. This study offers insightful information on these topics.
• To identify important participants and rivals: This research studies can assist companies in identifying key participants and rivals in their sector, along with their market share, business plans, and strengths and weaknesses.
• To comprehend consumer behaviour: these research studies can offer insightful information about customer behaviour, including preferences, spending patterns, and demographics.
• To assess market opportunities: These research studies can aid companies in assessing market chances, such as prospective new goods or services, fresh markets, and new trends.
• To make well-informed business decisions: These research reports give companies data-driven insights that they may use to plan their strategy, develop new products, and devise marketing and advertising plans.
In general, market research studies offer companies and organisations useful data that can aid in making decisions and maintaining competitiveness in their industry. They can offer a strong basis for decision-making, strategy formulation, and company planning.
About US:
Stringent Datalytics offers both custom and syndicated market research reports. Custom market research reports are tailored to a specific client's needs and requirements. These reports provide unique insights into a particular industry or market segment and can help businesses make informed decisions about their strategies and operations.
Syndicated market research reports, on the other hand, are pre-existing reports that are available for purchase by multiple clients. These reports are often produced on a regular basis, such as annually or quarterly, and cover a broad range of industries and market segments. Syndicated reports provide clients with insights into industry trends, market sizes, and competitive landscapes. By offering both custom and syndicated reports, Stringent Datalytics can provide clients with a range of market research solutions that can be customized to their specific needs
Contact US:
Stringent Datalytics
Contact No - +1 346 666 6655
Email Id - [email protected]
Web - https://stringentdatalytics.com/
#Onshore Wind Turbine#Wind Energy#Renewable Energy#Wind Power#Large Wind Turbines#Sustainable Energy#Energy Generation#Turbine Technology#Wind Farm Development#Green Energy#Wind Turbine Market#Wind Turbine Trends#Wind Farm Investments#Wind Turbine Manufacturers#Energy Transition#Renewable Power Generation#Wind Turbine Efficiency#Wind Energy Infrastructure#Wind Turbine Innovation#Wind Turbine Maintenance.
0 notes
Text
Commentary - What will be the Construction trends in 2023
The following content was originally published February 2023 on IBM’s Category Insights Newsletter. Our end of year newsletter covered a lot of ground. First we looked at the market conditions for end-of-year for 2022. Then we considered which of those conditions were expected to have the greatest impact on the industry. We closed our newsletter with a look at what trends we expected to see…
View On WordPress
#2023#collaborative contracts#Construction#manufacturing#market#onshoring#Procurement#supply chain#trends
0 notes
Text
Boeing’s deliberately defective fleet of flying sky-wreckage
I'm touring my new, nationally bestselling novel The Bezzle! Catch me TOMORROW (May 2) in WINNIPEG, then Calgary (May 3), Vancouver (May 4), Tartu, Estonia, and beyond!
Boeing's 787 "Dreamliner" is manufactured far from the company's Seattle facility, in a non-union shop in Charleston, South Carolina. At that shop, there is a cage full of defective parts that have been pulled from production because they are not airworthy.
Hundreds of parts from that Material Review Segregation Area (MRSA) were secretly pulled from that cage and installed on aircraft that are currently plying the world's skies. Among them, sections 47/48 of a 787 – the last four rows of the plane, along with its galley and rear toilets. As Moe Tkacik writes in her excellent piece on Boeing's lethally corrupt culture of financialization and whistleblower intimidation, this is a big ass chunk of an airplane, and there's no way it could go missing from the MRSA cage without a lot of people knowing about it:
https://prospect.org/infrastructure/transportation/2024-04-30-whistleblower-laws-protect-lawbreakers/
More: MRSA parts are prominently emblazoned with red marks denoting them as defective and unsafe. For a plane to escape Boeing's production line and find its way to a civilian airport near you with these defective parts installed, many people will have to see and ignore this literal red flag.
The MRSA cage was a special concern of John "Swampy" Barnett, the Boeing whistleblower who is alleged to have killed himself in March. Tkacik's earlier profile of Swampy paints a picture of a fearless, stubborn engineer who refused to go along to get along, refused to allow himself to become inured to Boeing's growing culture of profits over safety:
https://prospect.org/infrastructure/transportation/2024-03-28-suicide-mission-boeing/
Boeing is America's last aviation company and its single largest exporter. After the company was allowed to merge with its rival McDonnell-Douglas in 1997, the combined company came under MDD's notoriously financially oriented management culture. MDD CEO Harry Stonecipher became Boeing's CEO in the early 2000s. Stonecipher was a protege of Jack Welch, the man who destroyed General Electric with cuts to quality and workforce and aggressive union-busting, a classic Mafia-style "bust-out" that devoured the company's seed corn and left it a barren wasteland:
https://qz.com/1776080/how-the-mcdonnell-douglas-boeing-merger-led-to-the-737-max-crisis
Post-merger, Boeing became increasingly infected with MDD's culture. The company chased cheap, less-skilled labor to other countries and to America's great onshore-offshore sacrifice zone, the "right-to-work" American south, where bosses can fire uppity workers who balked at criminal orders, without the hassle of a union grievance.
Stonecipher was succeeded by Jim "Prince Jim" McNerney, ex-3M CEO, another Jack Welch protege (Welch spawned a botnet of sociopath looters who seized control of the country's largest, most successful firms, and drove them into the ground). McNerney had a cute name for the company's senior engineers: "phenomenally talented assholes." He created a program to help his managers force these skilled workers – everyone a Boeing who knew how to build a plane – out of the company.
McNerney's big idea was to get rid of "phenomenally talented assholes" and outsource the Dreamliner's design to Boeing's suppliers, who were utterly dependent on the company and could easily be pushed around (McNerney didn't care that most of these companies lacked engineering departments). This resulted in a $80b cost overrun, and a last-minute scramble to save the 787 by shipping a "cleanup crew" from Seattle to South Carolina, in the hopes that those "phenomenally talented assholes" could save McNerney's ass.
Swampy was part of the cleanup crew. He was terrified by what he saw there. Boeing had convinced the FAA to let them company perform its own inspections, replacing independent government inspectors with Boeing employees. The company would mark its own homework, and it swore that it wouldn't cheat.
Boeing cheated. Swampy dutifully reported the legion of safety violations he witnessed and was banished to babysit the MRSA, an assignment his managers viewed as a punishment that would isolate Swampy from the criminality he refused to stop reporting. Instead, Swampy audited the MRSA, and discovered that at least 420 defective aviation components had gone missing from the cage, presumably to be installed in planes that were behind schedule. Swampy then audited the keys to the MRSA and learned that hundreds of keys were "floating around" the Charleston facility. Virtually anyone could liberate a defective part and install it into an airplane without any paper trail.
Swampy's bosses had a plan for dealing with this. They ordered Swampy to "pencil whip" the investigations of 420 missing defective components and close the cases without actually figuring out what happened to them. Swampy refused.
Instead, Swampy took his concerns to a departmental meeting where 12 managers were present and announced that "if we can’t find them, any that we can’t find, we need to report it to the FAA." The only response came from a supervisor, who said, "We’re not going to report anything to the FAA."
The thing is, Swampy wasn't just protecting the lives of the passengers in those defective aircraft – he was also protecting Boeing employees. Under Sec 38 of the US Criminal Code, it's a 15-year felony to make any "materially false writing, entry, certification, document, record, data plate, label, or electronic communication concerning any aircraft or space vehicle part."
(When Swampy told a meeting that he took this seriously because "the paperwork is just as important as the aircraft" the room erupted in laughter.)
Swampy sent his own inspectors to the factory floor, and they discovered "dozens of red-painted defective parts installed on planes."
Swampy blew the whistle. How did the 787 – and the rest of Boeing's defective flying turkeys – escape the hangar and find their way into commercial airlines' fleets? Tkacik blames a 2000 whistleblower law called AIR21 that:
creates such byzantine procedures, locates adjudication power in such an outgunned federal agency, and gives whistleblowers such a narrow chance of success that it effectively immunizes airplane manufacturers, of which there is one in the United States, from suffering any legal repercussions from the testimony of their own workers.
By his own estimation, Swampy was ordered to commit two felonies per week for six years. Tkacik explains that this kind of operation relies on a culture of ignorance – managers must not document their orders, and workers must not be made aware of the law. Whistleblowers like Swampy, who spoke the unspeakable, were sidelined (an assessment by one of Swampy's managers called him "one of the best" and finished that "leadership would give hugs and high fives all around at his departure").
Multiple whistleblowers were singled out for retaliation and forced departure. William Hobek, a quality manager who refused to "pencil whip" the missing, massive 47-48 assembly that had wandered away from the MRSA cage, was given a "weak" performance review and fired despite an HR manager admitting that it was bogus.
Another quality manager, Cynthia Kitchens, filed an ethics complaint against manager Elton Wright who responded to her persistent reporting of defects on the line by shoving her against a wall and shouting that Boeing was "a good ol’ boys’ club and you need to get on board." Kitchens was fired in 2016. She had cancer at the time.
John Woods, yet another quality engineer, was fired after he refused to sign off on a corner-cutting process to repair a fuselage – the FAA later backed up his judgment.
Then there's Sam Salehpour, the 787 quality engineer whose tearful Congressional testimony described more corner-cutting on fuselage repairs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PP0xhIe1LFE
Salehpour's boss followed the Boeing playbook to the letter: Salehpour was constantly harangued and bullied, and he was isolated from colleagues who might concur with his assessment. When Salehpour announced that he would give Congressional testimony, his car was sabotaged under mysterious circumstances.
It's a playbook. Salehpour's experience isn't unusual at Boeing. Two other engineers, working on the 787 Organization Designation Authorization, held up production by insisting that the company fix the planes' onboard navigation computers. Their boss gave them a terrible performance review, admitting that top management was furious at the delays and had ordered him to punish the engineers. The engineers' union grievance failed, with Boeing concluding that this conduct – which they admitted to – didn't rise to the level of retaliation.
As Tkacik points out, these engineers and managers that Boeing targeted for intimidation and retaliation are the very same staff who are supposed to be performing inspections of behalf of the FAA. In other words, Boeing has spent years attacking its own regulator, with total impunity.
But it's not just the FAA who've failed to take action – it's also the DOJ, who have consistently declined to bring prosecutions in most cases, and who settled the rare case they did bring with "deferred prosecution agreements." This pattern was true under Trump's DOJ and continued under Biden's tenure. Biden's prosecutors have been so lackluster that a federal judge "publicly rebuked the DOJ for failing to take seriously the reputational damage its conduct throughout the Boeing case was inflicting on the agency."
Meanwhile, there's the AIR21 rule, a "whistleblower" rule that actually protects Boeing from whistleblowers. Under AIR21, an aviation whistleblower who is retaliated against by their employer must first try to resolve their problem internally. If that fails, the whistleblower has only one course of action: file an OSHA complaint within 90 days (if HR takes more than 90 days to resolve your internal complaint, you can no have no further recourse). If you manage to raise a complaint with OSHA, it is heard by a secret tribunal that has no subpoena power and routinely takes five years to rule on cases, and rules against whistleblowers 97% of the time.
Boeing whistleblowers who missed the 90-day cutoff have filled the South Carolina courts with last-ditch attempts to hold the company to account. When they lose these cases – as is routine, given Boeing's enormous legal muscle and AIR21's legal handcuffs – they are often ordered to pay Boeing's legal costs.
Tkacik cites Swampy's lawyer, Rob Turkewitz, who says Swampy was the only one of Boeing's whistleblowers who was "savvy, meticulous, and fast-moving enough to bring an AIR 21 case capable of jumping through all the hoops" to file an AIR21 case, which then took seven years. Turkewitz calls Boeing South Carolina "a criminal enterprise."
That's a conclusion that's hard to argue with. Take Boeing's excuse for not producing the documentation of its slapdash reinstallation of the Alaska Air door plug that fell off its plane in flight: the company says it's not criminally liable for failing to provide the paperwork, because it never documented the repair. Not documenting the repair is also a crime.
You might have heard that there's some accountability coming to the Boeing boardroom, with the ouster of CEO David Calhoun. Calhoun's likely successor is Patrick Shanahan, whom Tkacik describes as "the architect of the ethos that governed the 787 program" and whom her source called "a classic schoolyard bully."
If Shanahan's name rings a bell, it might be because he was almost Trump's Secretary of Defense, but that was derailed by the news that he had "emphatically defended" his 17 year old son after the boy nearly beat his mother to death with a baseball bat. Shanahan is presently CEO of Spirit Aerospace, who made the door-plug that fell out of the Alaska Airlines 737 Max.
Boeing is a company where senior managers only fail up and where whistleblowers are terrorized in and out of the workplace. One of Tkacik's sources noticed his car shimmying. The source, an ex-787 worker who'd been fired after raising safety complaints, had tried to bring an AIR21 complaint, but withdrew it out of fear of being bankrupted if he was ordered to pay Boeing's legal costs. When the whistleblower pulled over, he discovered that two of the lug-nuts had been removed from one of his wheels.
The whistleblower texted Tkcacik to say (not for the first time): "If anything happens, I'm not suicidal."
Boeing is a primary aerospace contractor to the US government. It's clear that its management – and investors – consider it too big to jail. It's also clear that they know it's too big to fail – after all, the company did a $43b stock buyback, then got billions in a publicly funded buyback.
Boeing is, effectively, a government agency that is run for the benefit of its investors. It performs its own safety inspections. It investigates its own criminal violations of safety rules. It loots its own coffers and then refills them at public expense.
Meanwhile, the company has filled our skies with at least 420 airplanes with defective, red-painted parts that were locked up in the MRSA cage, then snuck out and fitted to an airplane that you or someone you love could fly on the next time you take your family on vacation or fly somewhere for work.
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/01/boeing-boeing/#mrsa
Image: Tom Axford 1 (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Blue_sky_with_wisps_of_cloud_on_a_clear_summer_morning.jpg
CC BY-SA 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
--
Clemens Vasters (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:N7379E_-_Boeing_737_MAX_9.jpg
CC BY 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.en
#pluralistic#mrsa#Material Review Segregation Area#787#dreamliner#swampy#faa#marking your own homework#monopolies#AS9100#Cynthia Kitchens#Sam Salehpour#737 max#ntsb#David Calhoun#boeing#whistleblowers#aviation#safety#John Barnett#maureen tkacik#Patrick Shanahan
744 notes
·
View notes
Text
Clean energy contributed a record 11.4tn yuan ($1.6tn [USD]) to China’s economy in 2023, accounting for all of the growth in investment and a larger share of economic growth than any other sector. The new sector-by-sector analysis for Carbon Brief, based on official figures, industry data and analyst reports, illustrates the huge surge in investment in Chinese clean energy last year – in particular, the so-called “new three” industries of solar power, electric vehicles (EVs) and batteries. Solar power, along with manufacturing capacity for solar panels, EVs and batteries, were the main focus of China’s clean-energy investments in 2023, the analysis shows.[...]
Clean-energy investment rose 40% year-on-year to 6.3tn yuan ($890bn), with the growth accounting for all of the investment growth across the Chinese economy in 2023.
China’s $890bn investment in clean-energy sectors is almost as large as total global investments in fossil fuel supply in 2023 – and similar to the GDP of Switzerland or Turkey.
Including the value of production, clean-energy sectors contributed 11.4tn yuan ($1.6tn) to the Chinese economy in 2023, up 30% year-on-year.
Clean-energy sectors, as a result, were the largest driver of China’ economic growth overall, accounting for 40% of the expansion of GDP in 2023.[...]
The surge in clean-energy investment comes as China’s real-estate sector shrank for the second year in a row. This shift positions the clean-energy industry as a key part not only of China’s energy and climate efforts, but also of its broader economic and industrial policy.[...]
The growing importance of these new industries gives China a significant economic stake in the global transition to clean-energy technologies.[...]
In total, clean energy made up 13% of the huge volume of investment in fixed assets in China in 2023, up from 9% a year earlier.[...]
The major role that clean energy played in boosting growth in 2023 means the industry is now a key part of China’s wider economic and industrial development.[...]
Solar was the largest contributor to growth in China’s clean-technology economy in 2023. It recorded growth worth a combined 1tn yuan of new investment, goods and services, as its value grew from 1.5tn yuan in 2022 to 2.5tn yuan in 2023, an increase of 63% year-on-year. While China has dominated the manufacturing and installations of solar panels for years, the growth of the industry in 2023 was unprecedented.[...]
An estimated 200GW was added across the country during 2023 as a whole, more than doubling from the record of 87GW set in 2022[...]
China experienced a significant increase in solar product exports in 2023. It exported 56GW of solar wafers, 32GW of cells and 178GW of modules in the first 10 months of the year, up 90%, 72% and 34% year-on-year respectively [...] However, due to falling costs, the export value of these solar products only increased by 3%.
Within the overall export growth there were notable increases in China’s solar exports to countries along the “belt and road”, to southeast Asian nations and to several African countries.[...]
China installed 41GW of wind power capacity in the first 11 months of 2023, an increase of 84% year-on-year in new additions. Some 60GW of onshore wind alone was due to be added across 2023[...]
In addition, offshore wind capacity increased by 6GW across the whole of 2023.[...]
By the end of 2023, the first batch of “clean-energy bases” were expected to have been connected to the grid, contributing to the growth of onshore wind power, particularly in regions such as Inner Mongolia and other northwestern provinces. The second and third batches of clean-energy bases are set to continue driving the growth in onshore wind installations. The market is also being driven by the “repowering” of older windfarms, supported by central government policies promoting the model of replacing smaller, older turbines with larger ones.[...]
Despite technological advancements reducing costs, increases in raw material prices have resulted in lower profit margins compared to the solar industry[...]
China’s production of electric vehicles grew 36% year-on-year in 2023 to reach 9.6m units, a notable 32% of all vehicles produced in the country. The vast majority of [B]EVs produced in China are sold domestically, with sales growing strongly despite the phase-out of purchase subsidies announced in 2020 and completed at the end of 2022.[...]
Sales of [B]EVs made in China reached 9.5m units in 2023, a 38% year-on-year increase. Of this total, 8.3m were sold domestically, accounting for one-third of Chinese vehicle sales overall, while 1.2m [B]EVs were exported, a 78% year-on-year increase.[...]
China’s EV market is highly competitive, with at least 94 brands offering more than 300 models. Domestic brands account for 81% of the EV market, with BYD, Wuling, Chery, Changan and GAC among the top players.[...]
The analysis assumes that EVs accounted for all of the growth in investment in vehicle manufacturing capacity [...] while investment in conventional vehicles was stable[...]
Meanwhile, EV charging infrastructure is expanding rapidly, enabling the growth of the EV market. In 2022, more than 80% of the downtown areas of “first-tier” cities – megacities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou – had installed charging stations, while 65% of the highway service zones nationwide provided charging points.
More than 3m new charging points were put into service during 2023, including 0.93m public and 2.45m private chargers. The accumulated total by November 2023 reached 8.6m charging points.[...]
China is rapidly scaling up electricity storage capacity. This has the potential to significantly reduce China’s reliance on coal- and gas-fired power plants to meet peaks in electricity demand and to facilitate the integration of larger amounts of variable wind and solar power into the grid. The construction of pumped hydro storage capacity increased dramatically in the last year, with capacity under construction reaching 167GW, up from 120GW a year earlier.[...]
Data from Global Energy Monitor identifies another 250GW in pre-construction stages, indicating that there is potential for the current surge in capacity to continue.
Construction of new battery manufacturing capacity was another major driver of investments, estimated at 0.3tn [yuan].[...]
Investment in electrolysers for “green” hydrogen production almost doubled year-on-year in 2023, reaching approximately 90bn yuan, based on estimates for the first half of the year from SWS Research. [...]
China’s ministry of transportation reported that investment in railway construction increased 7% in January–November 2023, implying investment of 0.8tn for the full year. This includes major investments in both passenger and freight transport. Investment in roads fell slightly, while investment in railways overall grew by 22%. The share of freight volumes transported by rail in China has increased from 7.8% in 2017 to 9.2% in 2021, thanks to the rapid development of the railway network. In 2022, some 155,000km of rail lines were in operation, of which 42,000km were high-speed. This is up from 146,000km of which 38,000km were high-speed in 2020.[...]
In 2023, 10 nuclear power units were approved in China, exceeding the anticipated rate of 6-8 units per year set by the China Nuclear Energy Association in 2020 for the second year in a row. There are 77 nuclear power units that are currently operating or under construction in China, the second-largest total in the world. The total yearly investment in 2023 was estimated for this analysis at 87bn yuan, an increase of 45% year-on-year[...]
State Grid, the government-owned operator that runs the majority of the country’s electricity transmission network, has a target to raise inter-provincial power transmission capacity to 300GW by 2025 and 370GW by 2030, from 230GW in 2021. These plans play a major role in enabling the development of clean energy bases in western China. China Electricity Council reported investments in electricity transmission at 0.5tn yuan in 2023, up 8% on year – just ahead of the level targeted by State Grid.[...]
China’s reliance on the clean-technology sectors to drive growth and achieve key economic targets boosts their economic and political importance. It could also support an accelerated energy transition. The massive investment in clean technology manufacturing capacity and exports last year means that China has a major stake in the success of clean energy in the rest of the world and in building up export markets. For example, China’s lead climate negotiator Su Wei recently highlighted that the goal of tripling renewable energy capacity globally, agreed in the COP28 UN climate summit in December, is a major benefit to China’s new energy industry. This will likely also mean that China’s efforts to finance and develop clean energy projects overseas will intensify.
Globally, China’s unprecedented clean-energy manufacturing boom has pushed down prices, with the cost of solar panels falling 42% year-on-year – a dramatic drop even compared to the historical average of around 17% per year, while battery prices fell by an even steeper 50%. This, in turn, has encouraged much faster take-up of clean-energy technologies.[...]
The clean-technology investment boom has provided a new lease of life to China’s investment-led economic model. There are new clean-energy technologies where there is scope for expansion, such as [Hydrogen] electrolysers.
Mind-blowing is the only word for it rly [25 Jan 24]
122 notes
·
View notes
Text
Copper cannot be mined quickly enough to keep up with current U.S. policy guidelines to transition the country's electricity and vehicle infrastructure to renewable energy, according to a University of Michigan study. The Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law in 2022, calls for 100% of cars manufactured to be electric vehicles by 2035. But an electric vehicle requires three to five times as much copper as an internal combustion engine vehicle -- not to mention the copper required for upgrades to the electric grid. "A normal Honda Accord needs about 40 pounds of copper. The same battery electric Honda Accord needs almost 200 pounds of copper. Onshore wind turbines require about 10 tons of copper, and in offshore wind turbines, that amount can more than double," said Adam Simon, U-M professor of earth and environmental studies. "We show in the paper that the amount of copper needed is essentially impossible for mining companies to produce."
Read more.
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
“In his study of [the international coffee] market, scholar Joseph Nevins finds that the big changes occurring between the mid-1970s and the mid-1990s are related to the “longer-term struggle over the distribution of income related to the crop.” In the early part of this period, growers pulled in an average of around 20 cents for every dollar of coffee revenue. They were aided by an agreement called the International Coffee Accord (ICA) of 1962, which acted as a sort of cartel plan, constraining and arranging supply. In the wake of the Cuban Revolution, the Kennedy administration supported the ICA and its concessions to Third World workers as a Cold War tool to head off communist onshoring in the Western Hemisphere. But as the U.S. strategy changed, the country and its free-market Latin American proxies abandoned the ICA in 1989. The results were quick: By the mid-1990s, the grower share was down from 20 to 13 percent. Roasters, traders, and retailers in the drinking countries improved their share from 54 to 78 percent. That big, fast shift was partly thanks to repressed grower wages, partly thanks to repressed domestic service wages in the West, partly thanks to consolidation in the industry, and partly thanks to new high-priced coffee drinks. Starbucks went public in 1992, and if it seemed to be growing like a tech company in the ’90s, that’s because both thrived on the same social changes.
“Worsening conditions for workers in Mexico and in the rest of the Americas pushed people north, rapidly increasing the undocumented immigrant population in the United States. The Bracero program was over, but the jobs still needed doing. Caught in between employers who were hiring migrants and nationalist restrictionists, the Reagan administration legalized a few million undocumented workers while increasing border enforcement. Even though the vast majority of narcotics came into the country via legal ports of entry, conservatives and liberals alike framed border enforcement as a central front in the war on drugs. Increasing the costs of crossing couldn’t stanch the increase of people—they were responding to larger factors: Out-migration from Mexico’s coffee-producing areas increased after the dissolution of the ICA, for example. This tendency intensified after the North American Free Trade Agreement went into effect in 1994, pushing Mexico further toward cheap manufacturing exports and cheap imported American corn.
“The glut of cheap labor and commodities in this period undermined labor protections in the center as well as on the periphery, and the United States lost union jobs at a rapid clip. Reagan undermined the bulwark of government jobs by bringing Boulwarism to the White House. His signature incident occurred in his first year, when he fired more than 11,000 striking air traffic controllers and decertified their union. To the press, the president quoted an air traffic controller who quit the union and reported to work as ordered: “How can I ask my kids to obey the law if I don’t?” Once again, questions of individual criminality put the Reaganites on firm ground. Organized labor took to rearguard action, holding on to its institutions by agreeing to two-tiered contracts that reduced benefits and protections for new or future members. Capital shook off the midcentury labor agreement like a bad habit, reducing its accountability to its own workers the way it previously reduced accountability to the broader communities. The second part didn’t require as many votes.”
Malcolm Harris, Palo Alto
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
Yesterday (6/7 Dec) kayakers were able to successfully prevent the ZIM/ZIM Partnered ships from departing the dock for the day. Photos from Whistleblowers, Activists, and Communities Alliance (WACA).
Their media release, sent out while the action was taking place, reads:
A group of activists in kayaks has blocked the path of multiple container ships attempting to depart the Port of Melbourne this afternoon. The ships, the Dax, the Vanessa, and the Star, are currently unable to pass the protestors flotilla of around 40 vessels, which has created a line across the Yarra near the West Gate Bridge. The kayakers held Palestinian flags and were joined by a group of protestors onshore. The three ships are currently operating on ‘partner voyage’ arrangements with the israeli company ZIM. The Dax is owned by Contships Management Inc, and the Vanessa and Star are operated by the Mediterranean Shipping Company, who in September expanded their partnership agreement with ZIM to include further vessel sharing. Shams Moussa, a Palestinian activist, had this to say: “Australian politicians have Palestinian blood on their hands. Weapons and parts manufactured in Australia are shipped to israel using companies like Zim to commit evil acts of genocide, land theft and ethnic cleansing. Children have lost their families and homes, happiness has been bombed and burned. Yet, with each loss, a seed of resistance is planted, a determination to liberate and seek justice, that is the true Palestinian spirit.” Anna Angel, a Registered Emergency Nurse, said: “As a nurse, I have an ethical responsibility to denounce israel’s war crimes past and present. israel is targeting hospitals filled with nurses, doctors, healthcare workers and patients. ZIM and their partners Contship and MSC directly profit from the multi-trillion weapons trade that commodifies this loss of life, creating devastating impacts on human rights and on health outcomes.” Another protestor onshore, Elsa Tuet-Rosenberg, said: “As a Jewish educator, I applaud those taking action against the occupation. ZIM has a well-documented history of shipping weapons to israel. Targeting these ships costs israel money and, in tandem with actions all over the world, makes the occupation less viable. This has been a successful strategy in ending apartheid in South Africa. In recent months ZIM’s CEO Eli Glickman has pledged the use of the company’s ships and infrastructure to support the israeli government, with israeli security touted as the company’s ‘top priority.’”
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
The candidates are asked about Helene and how scientists say climate change made it worse. Vance is asked what the Trump administration would do to reduce the effect of climate change?
Vance says this disaster was Bad, and we have to help these communities. And Trump will do such a thing.
Re: Climate change, Trump and him support clean air and clean water, but carbon emissions — if they're true — can be solved by doing energy production here and onshoring manufacturing.
Walz's reponse is that yes, it was a horrific tragedy. He's worked together with governors nationwide, regardless of party. Trump says that climate change will lead to more beachfront property, yay. Meanwhile, MN farmers know that climate change is real, and they're trying to adapt. You can reduce climate change while creating jobs, which the Biden-Harris administration is doing.
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Green Growth: Investing in Sustainable Energy Projects in India
In recent years, India has emerged as a beacon of opportunity for investors looking to capitalize on sustainable energy projects. With a growing population, rapid urbanization, and increasing energy demand, the country presents a fertile ground for investments in renewable energy infrastructure. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in India's renewable energy sector has been steadily rising, driven by favorable government policies, technological advancements, and a shift towards cleaner energy sources. In this blog, we will delve into the prospects of investing in sustainable energy projects in India, focusing on the opportunities, challenges, and the role of FDI in driving green growth.
The Indian Energy Landscape: A Paradigm Shift towards Renewables
India's energy landscape has undergone a significant transformation in recent years, with a pronounced shift towards renewable sources. The government's ambitious target of achieving 450 gigawatts (GW) of renewable energy capacity by 2030 underscores its commitment to clean energy transition. This transition is fueled by-
1. Government Initiatives: Schemes like the National Solar Mission, Ujwal DISCOM Assurance Yojana (UDAY), and the Green Energy Corridor Project aim to boost renewable energy adoption and address infrastructure challenges.
2. Attractive Policies: The introduction of initiatives like feed-in tariffs, renewable purchase obligations, and tax incentives have created a conducive environment for renewable energy investments.
3. Technological Advancements: Advancements in solar, wind, and energy storage technologies have significantly reduced costs, making renewable energy more competitive with conventional sources.
4. International Commitments: India's commitment to the Paris Agreement and its pledge to reduce carbon emissions have further propelled the transition towards cleaner energy sources.
Opportunities for Investors
Investing in sustainable energy projects in India offers a myriad of opportunities across various segments of the renewable energy value chain:
1. Solar Power: India receives abundant sunlight throughout the year, making it an ideal location for solar power generation. Opportunities exist in utility-scale solar parks, rooftop solar installations, and solar panel manufacturing.
2. Wind Energy: With a vast coastline and favorable wind conditions, India has significant potential for wind energy projects. Onshore and offshore wind farms, along with wind turbine manufacturing, present lucrative investment prospects.
3. Hydropower: Despite challenges, hydropower remains an integral part of India's renewable energy mix. Investments in small and micro-hydro projects, pumped storage facilities, and modernization of existing hydropower plants offer avenues for growth.
4. Energy Storage: As the penetration of renewable energy increases, the need for energy storage solutions becomes paramount. Investments in battery storage, pumped hydro storage, and innovative grid-scale storage technologies are on the rise.
5. Electric Vehicle Infrastructure: The growing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) necessitates investments in charging infrastructure, battery manufacturing, and renewable energy integration to support sustainable transportation.
Role of FDI in Driving Green Growth
Foreign Direct Investment plays a crucial role in accelerating India's transition towards sustainable energy:
1. Capital Infusion: FDI provides the necessary capital infusion required for developing renewable energy projects, especially in the initial stages where large investments are needed.
Here's a more detailed explanation:
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) involves the investment of capital from foreign entities into projects or businesses in a host country. In the context of sustainable energy projects in India, FDI plays a crucial role in providing the necessary financial resources to develop renewable energy infrastructure. Here's how capital infusion through FDI contributes to the growth of sustainable energy projects:
1. Financial Support: Developing renewable energy projects, such as solar parks, wind farms, or hydropower plants, requires significant upfront capital investment. FDI provides access to substantial funds that may not be readily available from domestic sources alone. This infusion of capital enables project developers to finance the construction, installation, and operation of renewable energy facilities.
2. Risk Mitigation: Renewable energy projects often involve inherent risks, including regulatory uncertainties, technological challenges, and market fluctuations. FDI can help mitigate these risks by providing financial stability and diversification of funding sources. International investors bring in expertise in risk assessment and management, which enhances project resilience against potential financial setbacks.
3. Scaling Up Operations: The scale of renewable energy projects in India is increasing rapidly to meet the growing demand for clean energy. FDI facilitates the scaling up of operations by enabling larger investments in utility-scale projects and supporting the expansion of manufacturing facilities for renewable energy equipment. This scalability is essential for achieving economies of scale, driving down costs, and enhancing the competitiveness of renewable energy solutions.
4. Access to Global Markets: Foreign investors often have access to global capital markets, which allows Indian renewable energy companies to tap into international funding opportunities. FDI can facilitate partnerships, joint ventures, or strategic alliances with foreign firms, opening doors to new markets, technologies, and business opportunities. This cross-border collaboration fosters knowledge exchange, innovation, and best practices in sustainable energy development.
5. Project Viability: Many renewable energy projects in India require long-term investments with relatively lengthy payback periods. FDI provides patient capital that is willing to commit to projects over extended periods, enhancing project viability and sustainability. Additionally, foreign investors' participation in project financing enhances investor confidence, attracting further investments from domestic and international sources.
2. Technology Transfer: Foreign investors bring in expertise and technology advancements that enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of renewable energy projects in India.
Here's a detailed explanation:
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) brings more than just capital; it also facilitates the transfer of advanced technologies and expertise from foreign investors to domestic entities. In the context of India's renewable energy sector, technology transfer through FDI plays a critical role in advancing the adoption and deployment of renewable energy solutions. Here's how technology transfer contributes to green growth:
1. Access to Cutting-Edge Technologies: Foreign investors often possess cutting-edge technologies, innovations, and best practices in renewable energy development and deployment. By partnering with or investing in Indian renewable energy projects, foreign firms transfer these technologies to local entities, thereby enhancing the efficiency, reliability, and performance of renewable energy systems.
2. Enhanced Research and Development (R&D): FDI stimulates research and development activities in the renewable energy sector by fostering collaboration between domestic and foreign entities. Joint R&D initiatives, technology-sharing agreements, and collaborative projects facilitate knowledge exchange and innovation diffusion. This collaboration accelerates the development of next-generation renewable energy technologies tailored to India's specific needs and conditions.
3. Capacity Building: Technology transfer through FDI contributes to the capacity building of domestic stakeholders, including project developers, engineers, technicians, and researchers. Through training programs, knowledge transfer sessions, and skill development initiatives, foreign investors empower local talent with the expertise and know-how required to design, implement, and maintain renewable energy projects effectively.
4. Adaptation to Local Context: While foreign technologies may be state-of-the-art, they often need to be adapted to suit local conditions, regulations, and infrastructure constraints. Through FDI, technology transfer is not merely about importing foreign solutions but also about customizing and contextualizing them to meet India's unique requirements. This process of adaptation ensures the practical applicability and scalability of renewable energy technologies in the Indian context.
5. Spillover Effects: The benefits of technology transfer extend beyond the immediate recipients of FDI to the broader renewable energy ecosystem. As domestic entities gain access to advanced technologies and knowledge, spillover effects occur, leading to the diffusion of innovations across the industry. This ripple effect catalyzes further innovation, competitiveness, and growth in the renewable energy sector, driving overall green growth in the economy.
3. Market Expansion: FDI contributes to the expansion of the renewable energy market by fostering competition, driving innovation, and improving project execution capabilities.
4. Job Creation: Investments in renewable energy projects create employment opportunities across the value chain, from manufacturing and construction to operations and maintenance.
5. Long-Term Sustainability: FDI promotes long-term sustainability by aligning investments with environmental, social, and governance (ESG) principles, thereby fostering responsible business practices.
Challenges and Mitigation Strategies
While the prospects for investing in sustainable energy projects in India are promising, several challenges persist:
1. Policy Uncertainty: Regulatory uncertainty and policy inconsistencies can deter investors. Clear and stable policies, coupled with transparent decision-making processes, are essential to instill investor confidence.
2. Infrastructure Constraints: Inadequate grid infrastructure and transmission bottlenecks pose challenges to renewable energy integration. Investments in grid modernization and infrastructure development are imperative.
3. Land Acquisition: Securing land for renewable energy projects can be a complex and time-consuming process. Streamlining land acquisition procedures and addressing land-use conflicts are critical.
4. Financial Risks: Fluctuating currency exchange rates, project financing challenges, and revenue uncertainties can impact project viability. Risk mitigation measures such as hedging strategies and financial incentives are vital.
5. Technical Challenges: Variability in renewable energy resources, technological limitations, and equipment reliability issues require continuous innovation and R&D efforts to address.
Investing in India’s sustainable energy projects holds immense potential for both domestic and foreign investors. With supportive government policies, technological advancements, and a growing market demand for clean energy, the sector offers attractive opportunities for long-term growth and impact. Foreign Direct Investment plays a pivotal role in driving green growth by leveraging capital, expertise, and technology to accelerate India's transition towards a sustainable energy future. Despite challenges, the collective efforts of stakeholders can unlock the full potential of renewable energy and pave the way for a greener, more resilient India.
This post was originally published on: Foxnangel
#green growth#sustainable energy#renewables energy#renewable energy green energy#sustainable energy projects#foreign direct investment#FDI#invest in india#foxnangel
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
#career #education #ndt #qa qc #oil and gas
RAZI INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERING is a dynamic, multi-dimensional, training & placement organization in the field of oil and gas, petroleum sector. We have evolved a unique blend of training programs, which are structured to provide effective career solutions to the youth. Our training programs includes oil and gas, quality assurance and quality control (QAQC), nondestructive testing (NDT), health, safety & environment (HSE),welding, piping, pressure vessel manufacturing, storage tank construction ,heat exchangers ,boilers, ship building ,offshore & onshore drilling ,pipeline construction , structural, painting ,coating, Insulation and more. RAZI INSTITUTE have direct contact with MNCs and private organizations for which we place our students. This not only helps us place students, but also structure the training programs to suit the needs of the corporate. RAZI have an eminent Advisory Board, which provides direction and guidance on the course design and developmental delivery process. Our primary strength is our ability to understand the aspirations, needs and potential of the youth and also committed to young generation.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
#Global Wind Farm Operation Market Size#Share#Trends#Growth#Industry Analysis By Type ( Whole Machine Manufacturers#Wind Farm Subsidiaries#Third Party Companies )#By Applications( Onshore Wind Farm Operation#Offshore Wind Farm Operation )#Key Players#Revenue#Future Development & Forecast 2023-2032
0 notes
Text
Industrial Applications of Mild Steel Pipes
Mild Steel (MS) pipes are widely used in industrial applications due to their exceptional strength, durability, and affordability. As a reliable MS Pipe dealer in Gujarat, Tube Trading Co., understands the importance of these versatile pipes in a range of sectors. In this article, we will explore the industrial applications of MS pipes and highlight their significance as a Square pipe distributor in Vadodara.
Construction Industry:
The construction industry heavily relies on the utilization of mild steel pipes for various applications. These pipes are commonly employed in plumbing systems, water distribution networks, and sewage lines. The corrosion resistance and durability of MS pipes make them particularly suitable for underground installations. Moreover, they are extensively used for structural purposes in the construction of frameworks for buildings, bridges, and other infrastructure projects. The square-shaped MS pipes supplied by Tube Trading Co. - an excellent Square pipe distributor in Vadodara, make them highly suitable for creating sturdy supports, columns, and frames, enhancing the overall strength and stability of structures.
Oil and Gas Industry:
The oil and gas industry heavily relies on mild steel pipes for efficient resource transportation. These pipes are crucial for conveying petroleum products, natural gas, and various chemicals. The strength, reliability, and cost-effectiveness of MS pipes make them an excellent choice for pipelines in the industry. They possess the ability to withstand high-pressure applications, making them suitable for both onshore and offshore operations. The most trusted and noteworthy MS Pipe dealer in Gujarat - Tube Trading Co. caters to the demand for quality pipes in the oil and gas sector, ensuring the seamless flow of resources and contributing to the industry's overall productivity.
Automotive Manufacturing:
MS pipes are widely used in the automotive sector for manufacturing exhaust systems and chassis components. The excellent weldability of MS pipes allows for easy fabrication, enabling the production of customized exhaust systems that meet specific performance requirements. Additionally, the durability and strength of MS pipes make them suitable for creating sturdy chassis components, ensuring the safety and structural integrity of vehicles.
Agriculture and Irrigation:
Mild steel pipes are an integral part of irrigation systems in the agriculture sector. These pipes are used to transport water from sources such as wells, rivers, or reservoirs to fields for crop irrigation. MS pipes are durable and resistant to harsh environmental conditions, making them suitable for both above-ground and underground installations. They are also utilized in the construction of fencing structures, greenhouses, and enclosures for livestock. Square pipes, distributed by Tube Trading Co. - a reliable MS Pipe dealer in Gujarat, are commonly employed to create robust support frames for agricultural structures, ensuring their stability and longevity.
Manufacturing and Engineering:
Mild steel pipes are widely utilized in the manufacturing sector for diverse purposes. They play a crucial role in the fabrication of machinery, equipment, and conveyor systems. MS pipes are employed as conduits for the efficient transport of fluids, gases, and other materials within manufacturing plants. Due to their strength and ductility, these pipes are reliable for conveying compressed air, hydraulic fluids, and various chemicals. Furthermore, in the automotive industry, MS pipes find extensive usage in the production of exhaust systems, roll cages, and chassis components, thanks to their durability and affordability.
Infrastructure Development:
MS pipes play a significant role in infrastructure development projects. They are used for the construction of bridges, flyovers, and elevated highways, providing structural support and facilitating the transportation of people and goods. MS pipes are also employed in the installation of underground utility networks, including water supply, sewage, and gas pipelines.
Choosing the right-sized mild steel pipes for your project:
Choosing the right-sized mild steel pipes for your project is crucial to ensure proper functionality, structural integrity, and cost-effectiveness. Let’s explore some key factors to consider while choosing the right-sized MS pipes:
Flow Requirements: Determine the flow rate or volume of fluids or gases that will pass through the pipe. Calculate the required pipe diameter based on the desired flow velocity and pressure drop. This will help you choose a pipe size that can handle the anticipated flow without causing excessive pressure loss.
Load-Bearing Capacity: Assess the load-bearing requirements of your project. Consider the weight or load that the pipe will need to support, whether it's structural loads, machinery, or equipment. Larger-diameter pipes with thicker walls generally have a higher load-bearing capacity, providing greater strength and stability.
Material Compatibility: Ensure that the chosen mild steel pipe is compatible with the fluids or gases that will be conveyed. Consider factors such as corrosion resistance, chemical compatibility, and temperature limitations. Mild steel pipes are generally suitable for a wide range of applications, but if you anticipate exposure to corrosive environments, you may need to consider additional protective coatings or alternative materials.
Installation Considerations: Evaluate the available space and installation requirements. Consider factors such as the pipe's length, flexibility, and ease of joining. Determine whether you need straight lengths or require bends, fittings, or connectors to navigate through the project site. Ensure that the chosen pipe size can be accommodated within the available space without hindering the overall functionality of the system.
Standards and Regulations: Comply with industry standards and regulations governing pipe sizing for specific applications. Different industries and regions may have specific guidelines regarding pipe size selection. Familiarize yourself with relevant codes and standards to ensure compliance and to guarantee the safety and efficiency of your project.
Cost Considerations: Evaluate the cost implications associated with different pipe sizes. Larger-diameter pipes with thicker walls tend to be more expensive than smaller ones. Consider the balance between cost and performance to ensure that you select a pipe size that meets your project requirements while optimizing your budget.
Consultation and Expert Advice: If you are uncertain about the appropriate pipe size for your project, it is advisable to consult with experienced engineers, contractors, or MS pipe dealers. They can provide valuable insights and help you make an informed decision based on the specific needs and constraints of your project.
Final Thoughts:
Mild steel (MS) pipes have become indispensable in numerous industrial applications due to their versatility, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. In Gujarat, a state experiencing rapid industrial growth, Square pipe distributors in Vadodara serve as crucial suppliers, fulfilling the demand for quality pipes, including square pipes. The construction industry benefits from mild steel pipes for plumbing and structural applications, while the manufacturing sector relies on them for machinery fabrication. In agriculture, these pipes find extensive usage in irrigation systems and the construction of agricultural structures. Furthermore, the oil and gas industry heavily depends on MS pipes for efficient resource transportation. The widespread utilization of mild steel pipes underscores their importance in driving industrial development and infrastructure growth.
#distributor#Jindal pipes#steel industry#steel companies#industrial#seamless pipes#piping material#plumbing industry#construction structure#manufacturer#construction sites
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
DTH Drilling Solutions and Types of Down-the-Hole Drills
Down-the-hole (DTH) drilling solutions have emerged as a game-changer in modern drilling technologies, revolutionizing how various industries extract valuable resources from the Earth. These ingenious tools are designed to provide efficient and cost-effective dth drilling solutions across diverse applications. This blog post will explore the different types of DTH drills and how they cater to specific drilling needs.
Conventional DTH Drills:
Conventional Down the hole drills are the foundation of down-the-hole drilling technology. They consist of a hammer and bit assembly, where the hammer delivers powerful percussive forces to the bit while air circulates to clear debris from the hole. These drills are known for their simplicity, ruggedness, and ability to penetrate various rock formations. They find mining, quarrying, construction, and water well drilling applications.
Reverse Circulation (RC) DTH Drills:
RC DTH drills address the challenges of collecting accurate geological samples while drilling. They incorporate a dual-wall drill string that enables the collection of rock cuttings through a separate inner tube, preventing contamination. This design facilitates better analysis of subsurface formations and is widely used in mineral exploration and geotechnical investigations.
Oilfield DTH Drills:
In the oil and gas industry, DTH drilling solutions have been adapted to suit the specific demands of offshore and onshore exploration. Oilfield DTH drills are engineered to withstand harsh environments, high pressures, and challenging drilling conditions. These drills are crucial in wellbore construction, geothermal drilling, and other energy-related applications.
Symmetric and Eccentric DTH Drills:
Symmetric and eccentric DTH drills are specialized variations of conventional DTH drills. Symmetric designs ensure balanced wear on the bit's face, providing uniform drilling performance. On the other hand, eccentric designs intentionally create uneven bit wear, leading to faster penetration rates in certain rock formations. The choice between these two designs depends on the specific geological characteristics of the drilling site.
High-Frequency DTH Drills:
High-frequency DTH drills utilize advanced technology to deliver rapid and efficient drilling. By increasing the impact frequency, these drills can achieve faster penetration rates while maintaining bit longevity. High-frequency DTH drills are commonly used in large-scale mining operations where productivity is a top priority.
Auger DTH Drills:
Auger Down the Hole drills combine the principles of DTH drilling with auger systems. They are ideal for drilling in loose or unconsolidated soil conditions, such as sandy or clayey terrains. The auger attachment aids in removing drilled material, while the DTH hammer provides the necessary impact force. Auger DTH drills are frequently employed in environmental and geotechnical drilling.
Compact DTH Drills:
In scenarios where limited space is a challenge, compact DTH drills come to the rescue. These drills are designed to be highly maneuverable and can access tight spaces without compromising drilling efficiency. Their versatility makes them suitable for urban construction projects, infrastructure development, and tunneling operations.
Innovation in DTH drilling solutions is a testament to human ingenuity and the constant quest
for improvement. As industries evolve and new challenges arise, engineers and manufacturers will likely develop even more specialized DTH drill types to address these demands. These might include drills optimized for deep-sea exploration, drills that integrate real-time data analytics for on-the-fly adjustments, and eco-friendly drills with reduced environmental impact.
The journey of the Down the Hole drill is far from over, and the ongoing pursuit of enhanced performance, efficiency, and sustainability promises an exciting future for the field and the industries it serves.
Conclusion
The world of down-the-hole drilling solutions is diverse and dynamic, with various DTH drill types catering to specific drilling needs across industries. From conventional drills that power through rock formations to specialized designs for accurate sample collection and oilfield exploration, the evolution of DTH technology has transformed how we tap into the Earth's resources. As technology advances, we expect further innovations in DTH drilling solutions, contributing to more efficient and sustainable resource extraction processes.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
What comes after neoliberalism?
In his American Prospect editorial, “What Comes After Neoliberalism?”, Robert Kuttner declares “we’ve just about won the battle of ideas. Reality has been a helpful ally…Neoliberalism has been a splendid success for the top 1 percent, and an abject failure for everyone else”:
https://prospect.org/economy/2023-03-28-what-comes-after-neoliberalism/
If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/28/imagine-a-horse/#perfectly-spherical-cows-of-uniform-density-on-a-frictionless-plane
Kuttner’s op-ed is a report on the Hewlett Foundation’s recent “New Common Sense” event, where Kuttner was relieved to learn that the idea that “the economy would thrive if government just got out of the way has been demolished by the events of the past three decades.”
We can call this neoliberalism, but another word for it is economism: the belief that politics are a messy, irrational business that should be sidelined in favor of a technocratic management by a certain kind of economist — the kind of economist who uses mathematical models to demonstrate the best way to do anything:
https://pluralistic.net/2022/10/27/economism/#what-would-i-do-if-i-were-a-horse
These are the economists whose process Ely Devons famously described thus: “If economists wished to study the horse, they wouldn’t go and look at horses. They’d sit in their studies and say to themselves, ‘What would I do if I were a horse?’”
Those economists — or, if you prefer, economismists — are still around, of course, pronouncing that the “new common sense” is nonsense, and they have the models to prove it. For example, if you’re cheering on the idea of “reshoring” key industries like semiconductors and solar panels, these economismists want you to know that you’ve been sadly misled:
https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/24/economy-trade-united-states-china-industry-manufacturing-supply-chains-biden/
Indeed, you’re “doomed to fail”:
https://www.piie.com/blogs/trade-and-investment-policy-watch/high-taxpayer-cost-saving-us-jobs-through-made-america
Why? Because onshoring is “inefficient.” Other countries, you see, have cheaper labor, weaker environmental controls, lower taxes, and the other necessities of “innovation,” and so onshored goods will be more expensive and thus worse.
Parts of this position are indeed inarguable. If you define “efficiency” as “lower prices,” then it doesn’t make sense to produce anything in America, or, indeed, any country where there are taxes, environmental regulations or labor protections. Greater efficiencies are to be had in places where children can be maimed in heavy machinery and the water and land poisoned for a millions years.
In economism, this line of reasoning is a cardinal sin — the sin of caring about distributional outcomes. According to economism, the most important factor isn’t how much of the pie you’re getting, but how big the pie is.
That’s the kind of reasoning that allows economismists to declare the entertainment industry of the past 40 years to be a success. We increased the individual property rights of creators by expanding copyright law so it lasts longer, covers more works, has higher statutory damages and requires less evidence to get a payout:
https://chokepointcapitalism.com/
At the same time, we weakened antitrust law and stripped away limits on abusive contractual clauses, which let (for example) three companies acquire 70% of all the sound recording copyrights in existence, whose duration is effectively infinite (the market for sound recordings older than 90 is immeasurably small).
This allowed the Big Three labels to force Spotify to take them on as co-owners, whereupon they demanded lower royalties for the artists in their catalog, to reduce Spotify’s costs and make it more valuable, which meant more billions when it IPOed:
https://pluralistic.net/2022/09/12/streaming-doesnt-pay/#stunt-publishing
Monopoly also means that all those expanded copyrights we gave to creators are immediately bargained away as a condition of passing through Big Content’s chokepoints — giving artists the right to control sampling is just a slightly delayed way of giving labels the right to control sampling, and charge artists for the samples they use:
https://doctorow.medium.com/united-we-stand-61e16ec707e2
(In the same way that giving creators the right to decide who can train a “Generative AI” with their work will simply transfer that right to the oligopolists who have the means, motive and opportunity to stop paying artists by training models on their output:)
https://pluralistic.net/2023/02/09/ai-monkeys-paw/#bullied-schoolkids
After 40 years of deregulation, union busting, and consolidation, the entertainment industry as a whole is larger and more profitable than ever — and the share of those profits accruing to creative workers is smaller, both in real terms and proportionally, and it’s continuing to fall.
Economismists think that you’re stupid if you care about this, though. If you’re keeping score on “free markets” based on who gets how much money, or how much inequality they produce, you’re committing the sin of caring about “distributional effects.”
Smart economismists care about the size of the pie, not who gets which slice. Unsurprisingly, the greatest advocates for economism are the people to whom this philosophy allocates the biggest slices. It’s easy not to care about distributional effects when your slice of the pie is growing.
Economism is a philosophy grounded in “efficiency” — and in the philosophical sleight-of-hand that pretends that there is an objective metric called “efficiency” that everyone can agree with. If you disagree with economismists about their definition of “efficiency” then you’re doing “politics” and can be safely ignored.
The “efficiency” of economism is defined by very simple metrics, like whether prices are going down. If Walmart can force wage-cuts on its suppliers to bring you cheaper food, that’s “efficient.” It works well.
But it fails very, very badly. The high cost of low prices includes the political dislocation of downwardly mobile farmers and ag workers, which is a classic precursor to fascist uprisings. More prosaically, if your wages fall faster than prices, then you are experiencing a net price increase.
The failure modes of this efficiency are endless, and we keep smashing into them in ghastly and brutal ways, which goes a long way to explaining the “new commons sense” Kuttner mentions (“Reality has been a helpful ally.”) For example, offshoring high-tech manufacturing to distant lands works well, but fails in the face of covid lockdowns:
https://locusmag.com/2020/07/cory-doctorow-full-employment/
Allowing all the world’s shipping to be gathered into the hands of three cartels is “efficient” right up to the point where they self-regulate their way into “efficient” ships that get stuck in the Suez canal:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/03/29/efficient-markets-hypothesis/#too-big-to-sail
It’s easy to improve efficiency if you don’t care about how a system fails. I can improve the fuel-efficiency of every airplane in the sky right now: just have them drop their landing gear. It’ll work brilliantly, but you don’t want to be around when it starts to fail, brother.
The most glaring failure of “efficiency” is the climate emergency, where the relative ease of extracting and burning hydrocarbons was pursued irrespective of the incredible costs this imposes on the world and our species. For years, economism’s position was that we shouldn’t worry about the fact that we were all trapped in a bus barreling full speed for a cliff, because technology would inevitably figure out how to build wings for the bus before we reached the cliff’s edge:
https://locusmag.com/2022/07/cory-doctorow-the-swerve/
Today, many economismists will grudgingly admit that putting wings on the bus isn’t quite a solved problem, but they still firmly reject the idea of directly regulating the bus, because a swerve might cause it to roll and someone (in the first class seats) might break a leg.
Instead, they insist that the problem is that markets “mispriced” carbon. But as Kuttner points out: “It wasn’t just impersonal markets that priced carbon wrong. It was politically powerful executives who further enriched themselves by blocking a green transition decades ago when climate risks and self-reinforcing negative externalities were already well known.”
If you do economics without doing politics, you’re just imagining a perfectly spherical cow on a frictionless plane — it’s a cute way to model things, but it’s got limited real-world applicability. Yes, politics are squishy and hard to model, but that doesn’t mean you can just incinerate them and do math on the dubious quantitative residue:
https://locusmag.com/2021/05/cory-doctorow-qualia/
As Kuttner writes, the problem of ignoring “distributional” questions in the fossil fuel market is how “financial executives who further enriched themselves by creating toxic securities [used] political allies in both parties to block salutary regulation.”
Deep down, economismists know that “neoliberalism is not about impersonal market forces. It’s about power.” That’s why they’re so invested in the idea that — as Margaret Thatcher endlessly repeated — “there is no alternative”:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/11/08/tina-v-tapas/#its-pronounced-tape-ass
Inevitabilism is a cheap rhetorical trick. “There is no alternative” is a demand disguised as a truth. It really means “Stop trying to think of an alternative.”
But the human race is blessed with a boundless imagination, one that can escape the prison of economism and its insistence that we only care about how things work and ignore how they fail. Today, the world is turning towards electrification, a project of unimaginable ambition and scale that, nevertheless, we are actively imagining.
As Robin Sloan put it, “Skeptics of solar feasibility pantomime a kind of technical realism, but I think the really technical people are like, oh, we’re going to rip out and replace the plumbing of human life on this planet? Right, I remember that from last time. Let’s gooo!”
https://www.robinsloan.com/newsletters/room-for-everybody/
Sloan is citing Deb Chachra, “Every place in the world has sun, wind, waves, flowing water, and warmth or coolness below ground, in some combination. Renewable energy sources are a step up, not a step down; instead of scarce, expensive, and polluting, they have the potential to be abundant, cheap, and globally distributed”:
https://tinyletter.com/metafoundry/letters/metafoundry-75-resilience-abundance-decentralization
The new common sense is, at core, a profound liberation of the imagination. It rejects the dogma that says that building public goods is a mystic art lost along with the secrets of the pyramids. We built national parks, Medicare, Medicaid, the public education system, public libraries — bold and ambitious national infrastructure programs.
We did that through democratically accountable, muscular states that weren’t afraid to act. These states understood that the more national capacity the state produced, the more things it could do, by directing that national capacity in times of great urgency. Self-sufficiency isn’t a mere fearful retreat from the world stage — it’s an insurance policy for an uncertain future.
Kuttner closes his editorial by asking what we call whatever we do next. “Post-neoliberalism” is pretty thin gruel. Personally, I like “pluralism” (but I’m biased).
Have you ever wanted to say thank you for these posts? Here's how you can do that: I'm kickstarting the audiobook for my next novel, a post-cyberpunk anti-finance finance thriller about Silicon Valley scams called Red Team Blues. Amazon's Audible refuses to carry my audiobooks because they're DRM free, but crowdfunding makes them possible.
http://redteamblues.com
[Image ID: Air Force One in flight; dropping away from it are a parachute and its landing gear.]
#pluralistic#crypto forks#economism#imagine a horse#perfectly spherical cows of uniform density on a frictionless plane#neoliberialism#inevitabilism#tina#free markets#distributional outcomes#there is no alternative#supply chains#graceful failure modes#law and political economy#apologetics#robert kuttner#the american prospect
69 notes
·
View notes
Text
Renewable Energy M&A hits a record high of $100bn!
The global deal value surged by 48% y/y to $108bn in 2022; transacted capacity more than doubled to 740 GW. Corporate consolidations in the US and acquisitions of offshore wind assets in Europe were the major contributors to this rise.
Enerdatics has published its annual analysis of renewable energy transactions, globally. To access the full copy of this report, kindly visit enerdatics.com.
In the US, large, integrated power producers and oil majors expanded their presence in the onshore wind, solar and biofuels segments, fueled by incentives offered under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). The Biden administration’s waiver of import tariffs on solar panels from certain Southeast Asian countries improved the outlook for the US’s solar sector, contributing to a 309% y/y rise solar deal value during the year. Meanwhile, clean fuel tax credits and the rising demand to decarbonize domestic heating and power spurred billion-dollar investments in renewable natural gas (RNG) and alcohol fuels assets by bp and Chevron.
In Europe, private equity (PE)-led farm-ins in offshore wind assets, primarily in the UK and Germany accounted for ~40% of the region's transaction value. Ambitious government targets and supportive legislation, such as Germany’s Easter Package, drove deal activity. Further, the EU's plan to offset 3.5 billion cubic metres of Russian gas annually and efforts to decarbonize fossil fuel-based power and heating is spurring investments in renewable natural gas and energy-from-waste platforms. Shell and KKR led activity in the sector during the year.
APAC accounted for $19bn of transactions during the year, with India emerging as the premier market in the region. Onshore wind M&A activity surged by 69% y/y, as countries in the region overcame supply chain bottlenecks due to proximity to steel and equipment manufacturing hubs. Additionally, continued elevated prices of oil, coal, and LNG drove C&I customers to turn to corporate power purchase agreements, leading to a surge in interest for assets backed by bilateral contracts
LatAm deal value surged by 314% y/y, with Brazil accounting for 84% of the region’s transaction value. A 2021 regulation that allows companies to sign dollar-denominated PPAs incentivized foreign investment in Brazil's renewables sector by reducing forex risk. Meanwhile, Chile recorded $1bn of deals in 2022, however, transmission bottlenecks continue to impact investor appetite in the country.
PS: The above analysis is proprietary to Enerdatics’ energy analytics team, based on the current understanding of the available data. The information is subject to change and should not be taken to constitute professional advice or a recommendation.
12 notes
·
View notes