Transform Ideas into Art with Online AI Image Generator
Improve your digital designs with the ease of an online AI image generator this tool helps you to create breathtaking visuals simply share your ideas, and our AI technology will bring them to life in stunning images. Whether it's vibrant illustrations or sleek graphics, ignite your imagination and enhance your projects effortlessly. Step into the realm of AI-driven creativity today.
0 notes
i genuinely don't care how good a piece of ai generated art or writing looks on the surface. i don't care if it emulates brush strokes and metaphor in a way indistinguishable from those created by a person.
it is not the product of thoughtful creation. it offers no insights into the creator's life or viewpoint. it has no connection to a moment in time or a place or an attitude. it has no perspective. it has no value.
it's empty, it's hollow, and it exists only to generate clicks (and by extension, ad revenue.)
it's just another revolting symptom of the disease that is late stage capitalism, and it fucking sucks.
10K notes
·
View notes
Ok it's that time again for me to say that AI is used by scammers on social media.
Can you point out what is wrong with these ai images?
Cause your grandma on Facebook can't.
Notice the repeated text?
The similar themes?
The lack of hands in every "first cake" photo?
Yes, a lot of the likes and comments are from other spam or scam accounts, but not all of them.
Teach the people in your life how to spot AI art and how to spot scammer and spam accounts.
9 notes
·
View notes
and im still not convinced that using art in a database to train an image generation model counts as art theft. to me, art theft is deliberately stealing a piece of art to repost and to pass off as your own or make a profit off of. that's not what image generation models and other "ai art" are doing. and putting aside ethical feelings for a moment - how would "art theft" like that even be prosecuted? you might as well make saving an image from google images illegal if thats how you feel
13 notes
·
View notes
https://nightshade.cs.uchicago.edu/whatis.html
I might be late to this but there are actually ways for artists to protect their art online from AI artists and users from feeding their hard-work into AI software using WebGlaze or Nightshade.
The first video perfectly explains this better than I can but basically Glazing your art DEFENDS your art from being fed through software, by producing a very messy and incoherent picture. Whereas Nightshade actually POISONS the AI software and Model over a set of time to exposure to Nightshade.
It’s definitely worth giving it a shot, so please defend and protect your work from bastards online which use your work to profit off it! <3
PLEASE REBLOG THIS POST! WE CAN TRY AND KILL OFF AI FROM STEALING FROM ACTUAL HARD-WORKING ARTISTS!
13 notes
·
View notes
Unlock Creative Brilliance with AI Generated Designs by Resleeve
Explore Resleeve's innovative AI-generated designs feature, leveraging tools like Make an Image Variation, Mix Multiple Images, Sketch to Photograph, Blend a Color Palette, Retouch Tool, and AI Assist. Push the boundaries of traditional design concepts and fuel your creativity with cutting-edge technology.
0 notes
I don't think a lot of pro generative AI (from here on just called AI) people get why a lot of creatives (writers, artists, photographers, etc) are so against it.
Because they always seem to think it's about jobs in these fields being taken up by AI that's our main worry. And honestly, that's not really why I care. In my ideal society, machines would do the labour intensive jobs for humans, and we'd spend our time pursuing things like art, music, or whatever as hobbies. Maybe we all learn to fix X% of the machines and that's our day job? idk. Anyways I'm not on point here.
My POINT is that the jobs to me aren't the main worry. The reason I dislike AI (and I know all my creative friends and mutuals and stuff agree) is that AI is built on work scraped from all over the internet, taking from the little guys like us to feed some billionaire corpo's machine. We didn't get paid, nor did we give our permission for our art to be study material for Image Bot #4583095. They just stole our works, and now are making massive money off it, all while gloating that they're "just as creative as the artists".
I wouldn't hate AI so much if it hadn't immediately exploited artists all over the internet. If like, ImGen(dot)AI (a site I made up just now) only trained their LLM on artists that a) gave their permission and b) were properly credited and paid, I'd be glad for them. Because that's how it should have been the whole time. But NoOOooOOoOOo, then the AI would be 'prohibitively costly' and 'they'd have to start from scratch'!! Poor millionaire techbros (;^;)
When it comes to AI making pictures/stories (it's not 'art' imo because that requires soul, something chapgpt doesn't have), or AI voice-work, or AI generated faces for people in movies/tv, the reason people are against it has nothing to do with 'hating progress' or 'unga bunga fire is scare Thomas Edison was a witch' shit. It's because the people who's hard work is used to make these generators want their fair share of the pie. You can get the code for a basic generative AI on github, but without the material to train it on, the material you steal from creatives to make your money, you'd have nothing to show for it. So forgive us plebeian creatives for not just bending over and taking it from the tech industry dry.
Until the industry gets its shit together and starts doing the bare minimum to respect the creatives that make their shit worth using (because lbr, without the art and works of creatives that were stolen to feed these fuckin things, AI wouldn't have anything to SHOW you), creatives are going to keep covering their asses by putting in anti-scraping tech and poison pill pieces into their work.
Frankly, I can't wait for all these lawsuits against generative AI companies to make it law that you can't just train your ai on other people's shit without permission. I mean you'd think people would know* that. You can't just steal shit from people (and yes, training your AI on someone's works without permission is stealing, unless it's something very clearly public domain. And no, google images is not public domain) and expect them to be all happy for you when your expressed purpose (as is the case with many generative AIs) to put the people you're stealing from out of a job.
3 notes
·
View notes
Aqui uma tirinha sobre como proteger sua arte antes de compartilhar ela com o público!!!
Contra IA e roubo de arte também 👀
Clique em 'ler mais' para ver a dica extra que mencionei no final!!
Aiai tava trabalhando nisso desde que aquela coisa da Meta IA explodiu mas só terminei agora 😭😭
Aqui a dica extra que falei no final: você pode usar o haveibeentrained.com pra procurar suas imagens e descobrir se seu trabalho foi usado pra IA.
Lá, você pode escolher não dar consentimento, mas empresas de IA não são obrigadas a respeitar isso então não é lá uma proteção enorme sabe?
Se atentem também que eles tem sim associação com IA e eles tentaram espalhar desinformação sobre o glaze pros artistas não se protegerem; o que é bem suspeito pra uma empresa que alega estar do lado dos artistas.
Também!!! Tem um novo tipo de IA que eu só fui descobrir quando já tava terminando a tirinha, o Copainter.
Ele completa trabalhos não terminados, o que pode ser usado para roubarem seus wips e dizerem q foram eles q fizeram, antes mesmo de vc terminar sua arte.
Coloquem uma foto de gato nos próximos wips que vocês postarem!!! Só colar a foto no canvas e vc tá seguro!
Um método de proteção super engraçado né ASKDALKSDU mas aqui o teste pra você que é cínico:
Talvez eu complete essa tirinha com essa informação algum dia, mas só esses 10 slides deram um trabalhão então provavelmente não vai acontecer nem tão cedo
Obrigada por ler tudo, eu realmente aprecio seu tempo e espero que isso ajude <3 tomem cuidado, problemas de privacidade tão correndo soltos por aí ultimamente!
6 notes
·
View notes