#nurturing children

[manasastuff-blog]

Happy "Children's Day"#trending#viral

Children’s Day importance goes beyond fun and celebrations—it’s a reminder of the value and potential of each child in building a better future. Celebrated worldwide, Children's Day emphasizes nurturing young minds, creating supportive environments, and encouraging growth. In India, this special day, observed on November 14, aligns with Jawaharlal Nehru's vision of a nation focused on children's welfare and education. From school events to family gatherings, celebrating Children’s Day helps instill values of kindness, respect, and curiosity in young generations. Join us in exploring why Children’s Day matters for kids, parents, and educators alike, as we uncover ways to make this day meaningful.

Call :7799799221

Website:www.manasadefenceacademy.com

#ChildrensDay#ChildrensDay2024#ImportanceOfChildrensDay#ChildrensDayCelebration#FutureGenerations#KidsWelfare#ChildrensDayIndia#InspireKids#YouthPotential#ManasaDefenceAcademy

[kids-worldfun]

Become the Best Mom: Practical Tips on How to Be a Caring Mother

As a mother, don’t you want to be, metaphorically speaking, as warm as a blanket on a cold day? Or a cooling and refreshing drink after a hot day out in the sun? 1. Spend time with your children. Mothers, working outside the home or otherwise, have to spend a huge amount of time with their children. This time can be spent in talking, playing, cooking or reading with them. It is not advisable to…

[elblogdecleo]

Gentle Parenting: What It Is and How the Concept Was Born

[indgem]

Excited to share the latest addition to my #etsy shop: Handmade Resin Mother and Child Statue for Nursery Decor""Pure Love"Bond of Affection

https://etsy.me/3uCCHnO

[fastlane-freedom]

A Balanced Approach: Nurturing Children Without Overscheduling

In the fast-paced world we live in, parents often find themselves caught in the struggle to provide their children with enriching experiences while avoiding the pitfalls of overscheduling. The pressure to enrol children in numerous extracurricular activities can be overwhelming, yet purposeful parents are increasingly recognizing the importance of a balanced approach to child development. This…

[classic1970beauty]

[gutenbergpr-blog]

Nurturing is an inherent instinct for caregivers, parents, and educators. It is a natural biological inclination to safeguard the well-being of the young, ensuring their fundamental needs are met. We pass on the life lessons we've acquired through our own experiences with caregivers to our own children and students. Educators also find it instinctual to challenge our children academically. We establish higher standards for aspiring writers, encouraging them to incorporate more details and diverse sentence structures into their essays. We offer more complex mathematical problems to those who surpass grade-level expectations. However, there exists another facet of challenge that far surpasses academic growth in importance, one that transcends the confines of the classroom – personal growth. This encompasses the development of essential life skills such as emotional intelligence, self-awareness, effective communication, problem-solving, empathy, and more. These skills prove invaluable in navigating the intricate journey of life, replete with its myriad twists and turns.

[dc-probate-attorney]

Nurturing the Future - Parenting in a Marriage

Parenting is a journey filled with wonder, challenges, and boundless love. When a couple embarks on this adventure together within the framework of a marriage, they are tasked with the incredible responsibility of shaping the future. In this article, we explore the intricacies of parenting within a marriage, highlighting the joys, the hurdles, and the strategies that can help couples thrive as…

[a-controversial-mind]

Unconventional Parenting: Nurturing Well-Rounded Individuals with Unpopular Opinions

Discover effective parenting strategies for raising neurodivergent children with respect, kindness, and healthy boundaries. Gain insights into debunking misconceptions and nurturing their unique abilities. Real talk from a proud parent who demands respect without being a pushover. Explore the controversial mind of Charlotte Pearson as she challenges the status quo with an open-minded attitude of…

[conswayo]

liar

[hellspawnmotel]

epsilons

[luff-gore]

I had a revelation.

[lunarw0rks]

"simon is emotionless" "ghost is cold" this that—

MF HE WAS CALLING HOSTAGES SWEETHEART IN THE COMICS

[sunderwight]

Honestly fascinated trying to figure out how both of Ambessa's kids ended up being diametrically opposed to her whole jock spartan might-makes-right mentality.

Tthe obvious answer, of course, is that Ambessa's husband (Kino's dad, and the guy Mel thought was her bio dad until recently) was way more of a diplomat and way less of a fighter, both philosophically as well as in terms of skill. And that he's the one who passed this on to the kids.

This fits well enough as an answer. The guy in the portrait certainly looks more like a talker than a fighter, and we know that Ambessa has a thing for pretty, submissive men thanks to her whole introduction in S1. Also, regardless of Mel's genetics this is presumably the man who raised her and is her father in the "nurture" sense of the equation, so it would be completely reasonable for her to take after him.

However, there are a few issues here.

One is the fact that even when Mel is talking to who she thinks is Kino about the possibility of one of them being a bastard, or of a bastard half-sibling existing, neither of them mention their father at all. While I doubt either of them would hold illusions about Ambessa remaining faithful to a spouse (for all we know the guy's still alive while she's off carousing with twinks), you would think that if both kids were close to their dad or took after him particularly, there'd be at least a passing mention of him in the midst of this discussion.

Maybe Mr. Medarda died a long time ago, though. Perhaps it's a topic so buried that it's an established habit to simply never mention it. Or maybe there is an issue of estrangement between him and his children for other reasons. He doesn't seem to have factored into Ambessa's decision to send Mel away, nor is his potential grief brought up around the subject of Kino. Despite confirmation of his existence, he seems (ironically) to be out of the picture, though it could also just be that the writers wanted to leave their options open for what he might be like in case another Arcane-adjacent series comes into production. I am fairly sure that Mel is the most likely character from Arcane to create continuity into a show about Noxus or Demacia or something, if we get another LoL series, especially since her story feels the most unfinished.

However, there's another possibility, which is that Mr. Medarda up there was such a nonentity in his kids lives that he doesn't come up because there's not much of a relationship to acknowledge. In which case, even if he is more of a diplomat (and he and Ambessa were a political marriage, presumably?) it'd be hard to credit him with influencing the kids so significantly.

One of the interesting things about Mel and Kino is that even though they are at odds with their mother on a lot of topics, topics that even seem to tie into prevailing Noxian cultural ideals (so, things they'd have been overall raised to believe in by the rest of their house and not just their mother too), they are also kind of astonishingly confident in expressing themselves?

So, somebody must have been supporting their alternative viewpoints and validating them as opinions worth expressing, even if they weren't things Ambessa approved of or actually wanted to foster in them as opinions/philosophies.

I think an interesting option is that it was Ambessa herself who did this, actually.

Ambessa's lore mentions that she figured out really early on that Kino did not share her temperament at all. Also, that she started searching about for ways of ensuring not only her house's domination, but the survival of her children specifically. Because the succession in a Noxian noble house doesn't seem to be guaranteed by birthright, which means that Kino and Mel would probably face rivals from their own family if they seemed too weak or vulnerable to lead, and someone else contested it. An easy way to remove a "weak" leader would also be to just kill them off. That's even apart from external rivals (like the ones who actually did kill Kino).

Which means that even if her kids had different values and priorities, Ambessa would probably have wanted them to still present those opinions with ferocity and confidence. If they cower to her, they will cower to others, and that's worse than them just not being aggressive combatants or warlord types. If you're gonna be a peacenik weirdo (by Ambessa's standards) in Noxus then you better damn well still be an assertive one.

I like this idea partly because the image of Ambessa trying to balance her kids having totally alien opinions about things like the value of life and importance of compassion, with trying not to actually beat down their spirits about it. Just spending a lot of their formative years being like, ugh, I have to listen to my nerd ass loser children tell me why they think mercy is a good idea. Such a fucking chore. Anyway great job presenting your arguments kids, lots to think about, let's go get ice cream. Then Mother has to fire one of your military tactics instructors for daring to call you a couple of wieners. Again. Even though she's right.

[sergle]

what I was talking abt earlier. we have fully looped back around and away from feminism, societally, whereas before it was very Feminism 101 to acknowledge that many parts of existing as a woman in a misogynistic society are painful and upsetting. not that being a woman is Inherently Negative in a bubble. but that living on this earth, in the conditions we're living in, is hostile to women. and that gender is a performance. that many of the Staples Of Femininity as accepted by society are things that you have to create and perform and mold artificially and aren't inherent, that COMPLAINING about day to day difficulties of existing as a woman is something that you're allowed to do. acknowledging these basic, again, feminism 101 things, that something tied to womanhood is more time consuming or more expensive or more dangerous Because Of The Problems. does not CREATE the problems. that when women complain about having to perform femininity, they are not, in fact, oppressing themselves. the call does not come from inside the fucking house. saying that you HAVE suffered does not fucking equate that you believe you SHOULD have suffered.

like I could talk about this for hours. how braindead and one-dimensional the Takes are getting. "being a woman is looking in the mirror and going fuck yeah i'm a woman" damn. I guess any negative experiences you have by living in a misogynistic world... are your fault if you are anything but positive? "you don't actually want liberation" we've fully gone back to telling feminists "you WANT to be oppressed" when anything negative about our society is pointed out. it's not real until I say it out loud, I guess, and then I'm actually the one who caused it. if anybody expresses any unhappiness with how they're treated or the status quo or the language and culture surrounding womanhood and femininity. they've created it, right that second. they invented it just now. it wasn't a problem before somebody complained, right? also trans women aren't braindead zombies who just follow the flow of whatever cis women around them say. I am pretty fucking sure they are very much aware of pain, and are MORE than aware of the swirling torrent of misogyny and standards of femininity than anybody else. actually. and I am pretty sure someone complaining on tumblr that being a woman means always putting on a performance is going to make someone change their mind about transitioning. also "performing femininity" as a necessity to being treated well as a woman is not fucking NEWS to your Local Trans Woman. I AM PRETTY SURE SHE GETS THE CONCEPT. using trans women as a scapegoat for this braindead perspective on gender politics is spineless, meritless, and pathetic.