#nemeczek

[krzysztofiwin]

Krzysztof Iwin – „Nemeczek” olej płyta 33x46cm (2001) https://iwin.malarstwo.org/pl/nemeczek-292.html #33cm #46cm #2001r #brązy #fiolety #szarości #zielenie #żółcienie #art #painting #Iwin #KrzysztofIwin #obrazy #galeria #malarstwo #obrazyolejne #olejenaplycie

[boyfeelxo]

Nemeczek should've been at the club

[al13th]

Nemeczek

[cykamfotki]

[nanshe-of-nina]

Wizarding Russian Empire and USSR || Heads of Vyraj

Velonia Volosovna Kukulka (18 January 1891 – 15 April 1938) Head of Vyraj, 1930 – October 1936

[See here]

Olivera Lazarevna Kargina (3 March 1892 – 10 March 1940) Head of Vyraj, November 1936 – October 1938

[See here]

Vesna Yaroslavna Zhavoronkova (20 March 1895 – 21 June 1960) Head of Vyraj, November 1938 – December 1945

Zhavoronkova was born to a family of broomstick makers from Perm. She first joined the BK in 1919 and the Zhnetsy in 1921. She was assigned to Azerbaijan in 1925 and there came a favourite of the future Vedma of the region, Asena Zaurovna Aslanova, the best friend and sister-in-law of the notorious Nane Aslanyan. She was appointed as the head of Vyraj de facto by Aslanyan, though Valery Medvednikov (at least on paper) signed off on it. Though just as cruel as Kargina, Zhavoronkova was more competent than her predecessor and determined to improve productivity, even though that never quite manifested.

In 1939, she and her cousin, Zoria Anatolyevna Zhavoronkova, organized the murders of Lyudovik Ul’rixovich Nemeczek and Svetovid Svarogovich Zolotarev with the assistance of two inmates, Melinoye Spiridonovna Schwarzkopf and Boris Olegovich Medvedenko. Schwarzkopf seduced Nemeczek and then stabbed him to death while Medvedenko beat Zolotarev to death with the help of an accomplice. Though portrayed at the time as Lutsenkoist sympathizers, Schwarzkopf and Medvedenko were actually former professional criminals from Ledenets who had been arrested in the spring of 1934 due to their acquaintance with Maria Iosifovna Kovalskaya, the assassin of Marena Volosovna Kulchytskaya, and they had committed the murders as part of a bargain with the Zhavoronkovas to get their sentences reduced. (This promise was not fulfilled and instead both Schwarzkopf and Medvedenko were executed in 1940.)

Zoria became the head of the Ledenets Zhnetsy afterwards as a reward, but both of them were themselves arrested in the fall of 1950 by Svarog Borisovich Myasnikov and accused of involvement in the Ledenets affair (a supposed conspiracy centered around Dobrynya Nikitich Porozov and Zhiva Yarilovna Chereshkova). They both refused to admit guilt, despite being repeatedly tortured, and were instead given long sentences in prison. However, Zoria was retried two months later and executed. Vesna was ostensibly freed briefly from prison in 1954 after the Ledenets affair was unmasked as a fabrication, but was immediately sent back due to her association with Aslanyan.

In 1956, the new head of the Zhnetsy, Artyom Akteonovich Lovtsevich, briefly pulled her out of prison to interview her about the exact fates of Nemeczek, Zolotarev, and Tsovinar Aramazdovna Zafranian. She admitted to having orchestrated the murders of the first two with Zoria and that she’d had the third executed in 1942 on the orders of Aslanyan and Andronik Nikiforovich Orlov, as Zafranian had outlived her usefulness. 

Zhavoronkova killed herself in prison in 1960 by poisoning and left behind a rambling suicide note proclaiming herself a loyal daughter of the Revolution and complaining about she’d been framed by conspiracies. Her nephew, Yaromir Georgiyevich Zhavoronkov, and Fekla Mitrofanovna Ponomarenko have both propagated the conspiracy theory that she was actually murdered on the orders of Vasilisa Minosovna Morozenko, but this theory has met with little acceptance from scholars. 

Anastasiya Hesperovna Kozodoeva (22 December 1901 – 7 August 1979) Head of Vyraj, January 1946 – November 1953

Kozodoeva was born in the Volga into a poor, Halfblood family. Much of her early life is obscure, other than she first joined the Auror office as a secretary in 1919. She was transferred to the Zhnetsy in 1922 and stationed in Tatarstan. In 1933, she began working as a guard in Vyraj before being transferred to the Lysaya Gora office in 1939. In 1946, Avdotya Spiridonovna Pastukhova and Svarog Borisovich Myasnikov had her appointed as the new head of Vyraj to displace Zhavoronkova, who was regarded as a creature of Aslanyan.

Unlike the more flamboyant Kukulka, Kargina, and Zhavoronkova, Kozodoeva is a highly enigmatic figure, who spent most of her time time as the head of Vyraj trying to come up with semi-plausible reasons to extend the sentences of political prisoners at the behest of her superiors. Her only noteworthy action was honestly informing Aslanyan after the death of Kostov in June 1953 that the current system was not sustainable and that she and her predecessors had constantly lied to the Sovet Koldunov about its productivity to preserve their heads.

Afterwards, she gratefully resigned as head in November 1953 and transferred to a position overseeing protections for diplomats. Being politically unattached, she survived the downfalls of Aslanyan and Myasnikov and even Pastukhova and Lovtsevich. She retired from the Zhnetsy in 1966 and lived the rest of her life in obscurity, dying of an illness in 1979. 

Ilifiya Zinoviyevna Lelechenko (25 July 1904 – 14 May 1997) Head of Vyraj, December 1953 – January 1960

Lelechenko was a Halfblood from the Ukraine. Her father was a zemylanin farmer while her mother was a witch and midwife. She first joined the propaganda department of the Zhnetsy in 1922 and held numerous minor posts between then and 1944 when she was made the head of the Kazakhstan branch.

She was appointed Head of Vyraj in 1953 and asked to produce a report about the conditions there. The report took three months to produce, but basically confirmed what her predecessor, Kozodoeva, had said. Afterwards, Lelechenko began the slow process of demolishing the system and either transferring the prisoners to prisons or freeing them.

In the process of doing so, she uncovered accounts of extreme cruelty by the guards that both Kargina and Zhavoronkova had swept under the rug. Some of these accounts were then used to push a criminal case after the latter, who had been imprisoned on other charges since 1951. She resigned from the Zhnetsy after the closing down of Vyraj in 1960 and instead found work as a translator. She retired in 1966 and afterwards returned to Ukraine where she died in 1997.

[kraina-placu-broni-blog]

Parę słów o Nemeczku...

PODSTAWOWE INFORMACJE:

Imię: Ernest

Nazwisko: Nemeczek

Miejsce urodzenia: Budapeszt, Węgry

Rodzeństwo: brak

Zawód ojca: krawiec

Wzrost: niski

Kolor włosów: jasny (blond)

CECHY CHARAKTERU:

odważny - wkradł się do arsenału czerwonych koszul

honorowy - kiedy Gereb powiedział, że na Placu nie ma nikogo odważnego, zeskoczył z drzewa i bronił honoru przyjaciół oraz swojego

posłuszny - wykonywał rozkazy chłopców

bohaterski - pomimo choroby przyszedł walczyć o Plac

nierozsądny - zapalił zapałkę w szklarni, kiedy on i jego dwóch kolegów chowali się przed czerwonymi koszulami

wyrozumiały - nie kłócił się z kolegami mimo, że wpisali jego nazwisko do księgi jako zdrajcę

[stephandoleschal]

Rudi Nemeczek by Stephan Doleschal | Photographer

[offendedpaws]

Jakobe Mansztajn - Piosenka nocnych wioślarzy I, czyli Nemeczek w opałach

na początku mieliśmy tylko formę, była jasna

noc i staliśmy wsparci o murek. fasady budynków

były gładkie i przyjemne, mówiliśmy:

noc jest gładka i przyjemna jak te fasady.

mówiliśmy: nie ma takiej siły, i rzeczywiście

nie było takiej siły, która zrzuciłaby nas z ciepłego

jak krew krawężnika. ale wszystko działo się

tak szybko, jedna stacja, druga stacja,

ulicę stopniowo wypełniało szaleństwo.

mówiliśmy wtedy: przyjdź i wypełnij nas,

ziemio, nawet jeśli to oznacza coś złego.

a potem ziemia wezbrała i zaczęła nas wypełniać

[jeffersonsarmento-escritor]

A convite do Geovani Pereira, seguindo a linha dos 10 filmes... Fiz uma pequena alteração e incluo, além do livro, o que o faz estar nesta lista e um pequeno trecho de cada um. 3 - Os meninos da rua Paulo, de Ferenc Molnár Por que está aqui: Meu primeiro livro. Lido com a angústia de um garotinho que ainda estava aprendendo a amar os livros. E caindo de cabeça no drama do delicado e leal e honrado Ernesto Nemeczek. Chorei na última página, escondido de todos. Muitos anos depois, a lição de que as crianças mimetizam os dramas adultos ficou aqui enraizada, para o bem e para o mal. Um trecho: "Tinha o espírito cheio de uma porção de pensamentos tristes que antes nunca lhe haviam ocorrido, perguntas sobre a vida e a morte, para as quais não conseguia encontrar resposta." https://www.instagram.com/p/BsMLmmGg4av/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=13kom5chntn

[krzysztofiwin]

Krzysztof Iwin – „Nemeczek” olej płyta 33x46cm (2001) https://iwin.malarstwo.org/pl/nemeczek-292.html #33cm #46cm #2001r #brązy #fiolety #szarości #zielenie #żółcienie #art #painting #Iwin #KrzysztofIwin #obrazy #galeria #malarstwo #obrazyolejne #olejenaplycie

[marclefrancois1]

Rigid Oral Appliances Control the Side Effect of Unwanted Tooth Movement, Finds ProSomnus-supported Study

e0a9e1e9e6412908cf53cee25f32209b62d23d03e119cd2df63e6855e8fc22eee0a9e1e9e6412908cf53cee25f32209b62d23d03e119cd2df63e6855e8fc22eepostlinke0a9e1e9e6412908cf53cee25f32209b62d23d03e119cd2df63e6855e8fc22eee0a9e1e9e6412908cf53cee25f32209b62d23d03e119cd2df63e6855e8fc22ee is courtesy of Marc Le Francois

A ProSomnus-supported research study furthers the literature suggesting benefits of rigid oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) to control the side effect of unwanted tooth movement.

Previously, Norrhem, Nemeczek, and Marklund reported the benefits of a rigid oral appliance over a flexible one in reducing tooth movement.

The new poster entitled, “Tooth movement and bite changes for a hard-acrylic sleep appliance; 2-year results using the ProSomnus MicrO2 Sleep Appliance,” used the Little’s Irregularity Index to measure the impact of a hard acrylic appliance on tooth movement over several years. It found no significant tooth movement change over a 2.3-year period using the ProSomnus device without ball clasps or a soft liner (the default build for the MicrO2). What’s more, no statistical significant change was reported in overjet or overbite when the patient’s models were placed in maximum intercuspation.

“What is interesting about these results is that the ProSomnus Sleep Device is able to achieve excellent fit and retention without the use of ball clasps or soft liners and this enables successful control of tooth movement,” says co-investigator Nikola Vranjes, DDS, in a release. “Ball clasps themselves, though retentive, can create interproximal gaps, one of the side effects we are trying to avoid.”

Co-investigator Gene Santucci, DDS, says, “Managing side effects is critical to patient and physician acceptance of oral appliance therapy, this research and the ProSomnus appliances help reduce unwanted tooth movement as a barrier to treatment. Therefore, it was important that at the University of Pacific in SF, we scanned all the models and made all the measurements blinding the patient data and time points to ensure the lowest level of bias.”

David Kuhns, VP of technology for ProSomnus Sleep Technologies, says, “This research validates the goal of the ProSomnus platform to provide a comfortable, efficacious treatment while mitigating key side effects such as unwanted tooth movement.”

from Sleep Review http://www.sleepreviewmag.com/2018/08/rigid-oral-appliances-control-side-effect-unwanted-tooth-movement-finds-prosomnus-supported-study/

from https://www.marclefrancois.net/2018/08/02/rigid-oral-appliances-control-the-side-effect-of-unwanted-tooth-movement-finds-prosomnus-supported-study/

[ellymackay]

Rigid Oral Appliances Control the Side Effect of Unwanted Tooth Movement, Finds ProSomnus-supported Study

The blog post Rigid Oral Appliances Control the Side Effect of Unwanted Tooth Movement, Finds ProSomnus-supported Study was originally published to The Elly Mackay Blog

A ProSomnus-supported research study furthers the literature suggesting benefits of rigid oral appliances for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) to control the side effect of unwanted tooth movement.

Previously, Norrhem, Nemeczek, and Marklund reported the benefits of a rigid oral appliance over a flexible one in reducing tooth movement.

The new poster entitled, “Tooth movement and bite changes for a hard-acrylic sleep appliance; 2-year results using the ProSomnus MicrO2 Sleep Appliance,” used the Little’s Irregularity Index to measure the impact of a hard acrylic appliance on tooth movement over several years. It found no significant tooth movement change over a 2.3-year period using the ProSomnus device without ball clasps or a soft liner (the default build for the MicrO2). What’s more, no statistical significant change was reported in overjet or overbite when the patient’s models were placed in maximum intercuspation.

“What is interesting about these results is that the ProSomnus Sleep Device is able to achieve excellent fit and retention without the use of ball clasps or soft liners and this enables successful control of tooth movement,” says co-investigator Nikola Vranjes, DDS, in a release. “Ball clasps themselves, though retentive, can create interproximal gaps, one of the side effects we are trying to avoid.”

Co-investigator Gene Santucci, DDS, says, “Managing side effects is critical to patient and physician acceptance of oral appliance therapy, this research and the ProSomnus appliances help reduce unwanted tooth movement as a barrier to treatment. Therefore, it was important that at the University of Pacific in SF, we scanned all the models and made all the measurements blinding the patient data and time points to ensure the lowest level of bias.”

David Kuhns, VP of technology for ProSomnus Sleep Technologies, says, “This research validates the goal of the ProSomnus platform to provide a comfortable, efficacious treatment while mitigating key side effects such as unwanted tooth movement.”

from Sleep Review http://www.sleepreviewmag.com/2018/08/rigid-oral-appliances-control-side-effect-unwanted-tooth-movement-finds-prosomnus-supported-study/

from Elly Mackay - Feed https://www.ellymackay.com/2018/08/02/rigid-oral-appliances-control-the-side-effect-of-unwanted-tooth-movement-finds-prosomnus-supported-study/

[derechointernacionalpublico]

Conference: 2017 Cambridge International and European Law Conference

Conference: 2017 Cambridge International and European Law Conference

The Cambridge International Law Journal, in association with the Centre for European Legal Studies and Monckton Chambers, will hold the 2017 Cambridge International and European Law Conference, on March 23-24. The theme is: “Transforming Institutions.” The program is here.

  CONFERENCE PROGRAMME.

Thursday 23rd March 2017 08.30 – 09.30 Registration: Lower Ground Floor, The David Williams Building, Law Faculty, The University of Cambridge. Coffee and other refreshments will be provided. 09.30 – 09.45 Welcome Address by Professor Eyal Benvenisti, Whewell Professor of International Law, The University of Cambridge. 09.45 – 10.30 Keynote Address by Professor Jan Klabbers, Professor of International Law, The University of Helsinki. 10.30 – 11.00 Coffee Break: Coffee, Tea and other refreshments will be provided. 11.00 – 12.15 Panel 1: Transformations in International Criminal Law.

Dr. Annika Jones, Lecturer in International Law, The University of Durham: “A Quiet Transformation: Efficiency Building in the “Fall” of International Criminal Justice”.

Dr. Gabriel M. Lentner, Research and Teaching Fellow, The Danube University Krems & Lecturer in Law, The University of Vienna: “Transforming Institutions: UN Security Council Referrals to the International Criminal Court”.

Dr. John Joseph Heieck, Lecturer in Public International Law and International Diplomatic Law, The University of Kent, Brussels School of International Studies: “The Duty to Prevent War Crimes: Transforming Russia’s Veto Power in the Security Council?”

Panel 2: The Transformation of EU Law-Making.

Emilija Marcinkevciute, PhD Candidate, The University of Cambridge: “Sovereignty of Member States: the Role of Mixity in the European Union”.

Katy Sowery, PhD Candidate, The University of Liverpool: “How far are the formal structures under the Treaty for the amendment of Union primary law affected by the (transforming) role of the Union institutions?”

Dr. Zheni Zhekova, The University of Luxembourg & Catherine Warin, PhD Candidate, The University of Luxembourg: “Non-binding EU external arrangements: Transforming the EU institutional balance? The example of the EU-Afghanistan Joint Way forward on migration issues”.

Dr. Chrysthia Papacleovoulou, Scientific Collaborator in Law, University of Cyprus and Practitioner, Law Chambers Nicos Papacleovoulou, Cyprus: “The Transformative Role of Troika: with focus on the Cyprus bail-in and Greece bail-out”.

12.15 – 13.15 Lunch Break: A buffet lunch and refreshments will be provided on the lower ground floor of the David Williams Building in the Law Faculty.

13.15 – 14.30 Panel 3: Transformations in The European Court on Human Rights.

Gail Lythgoe, PhD Candidate, The University of Glasgow: “The Territorial Configuration of International Institutions”.

Edith Wagner, Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, Luxembourg & PhD candidate, The University of Heidelberg: “Attack of the clones at the European Court of Human Rights – How clone cases challenge and advance the Strasbourg System”.

Juha Tuovinen, PhD Candidate, European University Institute: “A Transformation in the Reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights?”

Panel 4: Institutional Transformations and the Court of Justice of the European

Union.

Zane Rasnaca, PhD candidate, European University Institute: “How important is the CJEU really?”

Ana Koprivica, Research Fellow, Max Planck Institute for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, Luxembourg & PhD candidate, The University of Luxembourg: “What Happens in Luxembourg (Still) Stays in Luxembourg?

Transforming the Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union through Extending Public Access to Oral Hearings”.

Dr Tamas Molnar, Adjunct Professor, Institute of International Studies, Corvinus University of Budapest: “The Court of Justice of the EU, autonomy of EU law and the relationship with other European courts.”

14.30 – 15.45 Panel 5: International Arbitration in Times of Transition.

Ridhi Kabra, PhD Candidate, The University of Cambridge: “Mass Investment Claims’ -transforming investment arbitration into a mass claims process?”

Jagdish John Menezes, Associate at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, London: “Unfit to Profit: Transforming the Shops in the Investment Disputes Marketplace”.

Georgios Andriotis, Associate at Shearman & Sterling LLP, Paris: “Rule of Law’s Transformative Effect on International Investment and Arbitration”.

Panel 6: Transforming Financial Institutions and the Market.

Dr. Thomas Papadopoulos, Lecturer in Law, The University of Cyprus: “Transforming the role of Member States in privatised companies: Justifications of golden shares in the CJEU’s case law”.

Ivona Skultetyova, Lecturer/Researcher in Law, Tilburg University: “From Law-making to Investing: Is European Commission’s Intervention in Venture Capital Industry One Step Too Far?”

Dr. Charikleia Vlachou, Lecturer in Law, Universite d’Orleans: “Between markets and hierarchies: institutional transformation in the European administration”.

Dr. Eytan Tepper, DCL Candidate, McGill University: “Polycentrism and Institutional Transformation from Without: China’s AIIB and NDB and the Co-existence of International Financial Institutions”.

1545-1615 Coffee Break: Coffee, Tea and other refreshments will be provided. 1615 – 1730 Panel 7: The EU Legal landscape: A Transforming Topography?

Professor Dr. Henri de Waele, Professor of International and European Law, Radboud University Nijmegen & The University of Antwerp: “Belonging to a Club that Accepts You as One of its Members’ – The Transformation of the Selection and Appointment Process at the Court of Justice of the European Union”.

Professor Rob van Gestel, Professor of Law, Tilburg University & Professor Jurgen de Poorter, Professor of Law, Tilburg University: “Communication between the European Court of Justice and national highest administrative courts: Judicial dialogue or living apart together?”

Professor Giulio Peroni, Adjunct Professor and Senior Researcher of International Law, State University of Milan: “The financial and economic systemic risk an opportunity to reshape the institutional architecture of European Union”.

1845 Drinks Reception followed by Conference Dinner at 19.30 in Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge.

Friday 24th March 2017 09.00 – 09.30 Arrival at David Williams Building, Law Faculty, University of Cambridge. Coffee, Tea and other refreshments will be provided. 09.30 – 10.15 Keynote Address by Professor Kenneth Armstrong, Professor of European Law & Director of Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS), The University of Cambridge. 10.15 – 11.30 Panel 8: The Transformation of EU Institutional Balance.

Emily Hancox, PhD Candidate, The University of Edinburgh: “Institutional balance in the EU following the increasing codification of EU fundamental rights”.

Benjamin Bodson, Research Assistant & PhD Candidate, Catholic University of Louvain: “What Legal Regime for Trilogues? State of Play and Perspectives”.

Desmond Johnson, Lecturer in Comparative Public Law, The Hague University of Applied Sciences: “Institutional Balance as an Agent of Transformation in the EU Constitutional Order”.

Panel 9: International Courts and Tribunals in Transformation.

Yuan Yi Zhu, DPhil Candidate, The University of Oxford: “China and International Courts in the Aftermath of Philippines v. China”.

Peter Tzeng, Postgraduate Fellow, Yale Law School: “First Decisions: The Arrogation of Jurisdiction by International Judicial Bodies”.

Johannes Fahner, PhD Candidate, The University of Luxembourg: “International Courts in Transformation: Alternating between Activism and Restraint”.

Gloria Okemuo, PhD Candidate, The University of Birmingham: “The Court of Justice of the African Economic Community (AEC) as a potential transformative agent in moving the African integration agenda forward: challenges and prospects”.

11.30 – 11.45 Coffee Break: Coffee, Tea and other refreshments will be provided.

11.45 – 13.00 Panel 10: The Domestic Effect of ECHR Law.

Pieter Van Cleynenbreugel, Associate Professor of European Union law, Universite de Liege,: “The implicit transformation of national administrative authorities in the service of supranational ‘fair trial’ rights”.

Dominik Rennert, PhD candidate, Humboldt University Berlin: “The Transformative Margin of Appreciation: Conceptualizing a Transnational Constitutional Court”.

Leonie Huijbers, PhD Candidate, Utrecht University: “The European Court of Human Rights in a Changing Fundamental Rights Landscape: A Procedural Reply?”

Dr. Maria Smirnova, Research Associate, The University of Manchester: “Injection of Justice: The Role of International Law in Transforming Institutions in Russia”.

Panel 11: Brexit.

Dr. Davide Paris, Post-Doc Research Fellow, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg: “Avoiding other Brexits”.

Patrick Fitzgerald, Clerk to the Irish Supreme Court: “The status of British law in independent Ireland: a model for post-Brexit Britain?”

Heinrich Nemeczek, Research Fellow, The University of Mannheim: “The application and surveillance of EEA Law by British domestic courts and authorities after Brexit”.

13.00 – 14.00 Lunch Break: A buffet lunch and refreshments will be provided on the lower ground floor of the David Williams Building in the Law Faculty. 14.00 – 15.15 Panel 12: European Courts as Agents of Change.

Auke Willems, PhD Candidate, Vrije Universiteit Brussels: “The Transformation of the Principle of Mutual Trust in EU Criminal Law by the Court of Justice of the European Union”.

Dominik Dusterhaus, Legal secretary, Court of Justice of the European Union: “Private International Law and the ECJ: Constitutionalization of Private International Law v Private Internationalization of EU Law Adjudication”.

Maris Moks, PhD Candidate and Research Associate, Hertie School of Governance, Berlin: “The Role of European Constitutional Courts in the Aftermath of the Euro Crisis”.

Panel 13: Institutional Responses to Contemporary European Crises.

David Fernandez Rojo, PhD Candidate and Researcher, University of Deusto: “From Frontex to the European Border and Coast Guard: Towards an Increasing Role of the Agency in the Enforcement of the External Border Control?”

Dr. Anastasia Karatzia, Assistant Professor in EU Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam & Menelaos Markakis, Researcher in Law, Erasmus University Rotterdam: “What Role for the Commission and the European Central Bank in the European Stability Mechanism?”

Akiva Weiss, Researcher in Law, The University of Hamburg and The University of Rotterdam: “The EU & OIC: A market-based solution to the European Union’s refugee crisis?”

15.15-15.30 Coffee Break: Coffee, Tea and other refreshments will be provided. 15.30 – 16.45 Panel 14: The UN Institutions and Transformation.

Sarah Shirazyan, PhD Candidate, Stanford Law School: “Combating Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Law, Politics, and Institutional Design of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540”.

Dr. Christopher Michaelsen, Associate Professor of Law, The University of New South Wales: “Transforming the Security Council: the Role and Leverage of Non-Permanent Members”.

16.45 – 17.00 Closing Remarks by Professor Kenneth Armstrong, Professor of European Law & Director of Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS), The University of Cambridge.

[via International Law Reporter]

http://www.dipublico.org/105443/conference-2017-cambridge-international-and-european-law-conference/

[cykamfotki]

[cykamfotki]