#narrative lenses
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
crimson-and-clover-1717 · 5 months ago
Text
It’s fascinating how the show plays with narrative lenses and allows the viewers to reassess Stede through Ed.
It’s said Stede should be killed for incompetence in episode one. Badminton calls him pathetic and mocks him mercilessly. We see the disdain of Stede’s father, and how ostracised Stede feels within his marriage. Jackie thinks he’s a loser within minutes. Blackbeard’s interest in Stede is ambiguous. Stede’s own self-loathing is evident. The only kindness we glimpse is Olu, Buttons and the indigenous islanders, none of whom seem to truly know or understand Stede.
Interestingly, Izzy seems to clock something of the power of Stede early and the threat to his status quo. Izzy does as much as he feels able to keep him from his Boss. It’s not quite clear though at this stage as to the reason why.
Finally, Blackbeard arrives on the Revenge, and gives us an entirely different lens in which to evaluate Stede Bonnet even before they’ve properly met: this guy is fucking fascinating.
Tumblr media
The viewer needs to reassess who Stede is from this point on. And it makes us look at ourselves and go, ‘oh…OH!’
81 notes · View notes
devilsainz · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
carcharlando
36 notes · View notes
metanarrates · 2 months ago
Text
ive always had sort of a weird researcher studying a bug fascination with romance fiction. absolutely alien world to me. kind of a scary place. mostly this has manifested in me reading a lot of bodice rippers and m/m fanfiction on the downlow but for about two years now it's resulted in me reading a rather absurd amount of otome isekai. i feel like half the time the popular sentiment online w/ arospecs having this approach to romance fiction is like "well i don't understand this fantasy but it's nice that people are having fun and i like rotating it in my head 🥰" but I'm not like that at all. there's a lot of totally unexamined reproduction & upholding of nasty societal stuff in romantic fantasies and that's why I feel compelled to examine them from the outside. i want to dissect it
25 notes · View notes
cosmic-walkers · 2 months ago
Text
I have so many thoughts about Jane and how her main goal was to be viewed through the eyes of men. She was a product of their consumption.
The silent, one-sided rivalry going on between Thomas and Henry over her is one of the most defining parts of the season. And perhaps, rivalry is not the correct word, but they both want her, they both desire her, Henry wants her because he needs an heir, and a wife, and for all the tears he doesn’t really care about her after her death. On the other end, Thomas wants her because he believes he could’ve been a better husband to her. He proclaims it at her death, and like Henry, he is left crying and shattered.
Between Henry and Thomas, Jane was propped up as a Madonna figure; an innocent doe, a virgin queen, someone who was untouched, and must be protected, and someone who is innocent.
She was very much seen and desired through their eyes, and their eyes alone. Even when she was in the company of other women, those women were drowned out, her relationships with them were not as strong as her relationship with Thomas or Henry.
She existed mainly for the consumption of men, to marry her, to impregnate her, to desire her from afar, to believe they could treat her better, etc. It reminds me of the movie Milena, if you’ve ever seen it or part of it. Where you have this beautiful woman, but her life/person is viewed through the eyes of men, and she is overly desired by them. Even the ‘good’ ones. This isn’t really a good or bad thing in Jane’s case. I just find it interesting how at least to me, she is a character propped up by men, and viewed through the eyes of men. There is hardly a scene with Jane where she is alone, without Thomas or Henry.
18 notes · View notes
mihai-florescu · 4 months ago
Text
Hyperfixated on learning, special interest in being smart
15 notes · View notes
wardensantoineandevka · 9 months ago
Text
I alluded to it in the tags about how I have another Spahr post to percolate on and think about, but I have to write a post about like, arguably, in terms of narrative role, Spahr IS the Trust.
I mean, not in like the people are shaped by institutions and cultures BUT institutions and cultures are composed of people way, though there's a lot to be said about that I'm sure. In that way, the Trust exists in all its agents and adherents, but I'm talking in a narrative iconography sense.
But, in a sense that like Spahr and the Trust sort of share a vitality, and they spiral at the same time, and you can trace the state of the Trust in parallel to Spahr's own narrative footing. In a sense, arguably, Spahr's arc follows that of the Trust. Spahr can be argued to be the highest narrative representation or stand-in or embodiment of the Trust as a social structure and hierarchy for a mechanical parallel, as an incarnation of its health as a structure: it breathes as he does, and it falters as he doubts, and it is lost the moment he walked out with his clarity.
I have to write a post, I have to write a post articulating all this bc this is just abstract high concept rambling that isn't really laying out the logic here.
7 notes · View notes
horsemage · 3 months ago
Text
It’s really no one’s business how many times I’ve listened to this
3 notes · View notes
littlestsnicket · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
eeee!!
#mayo blogs#i only have 50 pages left of iwtv#but i really don’t like reading pdfs on my ipad so i think i will switch over to the book anyway#i want to post a like step by step tracing of armand’s motivation around the trial in the show#but it kind of seems like work so i may not#it would be more fun to express narratively in armand/santiago fic but that is going to take me such a long time to write#and also like armand being armand you can only articulate so much of his thought process from his own pov#idk we’ll see what i do#but armand is so… he wants to be seen as a master manipulator but he’s just a bunch of trauma responses trying to reverse engineer#his own motivation after the fact when he’s under any kind of pressure#i’m really intrigued by the idea that armand ends up in the position he does after the trial because santiago accuses him of conspiring#with lestat to save louis and like that’s not what happened#but armand had to know what lestat was doing and could have stopped him if he wanted to and didn’t#so it’s true enough that armand can’t defend himself against the accusation#was thinking about the clip we get of them rehearsing the play after the reveal#where lestat is being a brat and santiago is looking at armand like ‘do something’ and armand is like kinda shrugs ‘you own this mess’#i want to poke that dynamic with a stick#i just… the show goes out of it’s way to show armand actively avoiding lying and being really bad at it the times he does#he’s a master at manipulating narrative but flat out lying is barely in his skill set#and i want to interpret the show through that lense with bits and pieces of book canon stuck in only when appropriate and supporting that#(tag essay on my own post… guess i could have put that in te post body but it’s too late now)
4 notes · View notes
maekarlargenaturals · 2 months ago
Text
Not to be a touchy ndn or anything but some of y’all non natives do earn a side eye from me when you clamor to be cheered for representation in art and writing irt the stark’s and northmen/wildlings when you make them vaguely northern indigenous. Mish mashing 5 different tribes and concepts together without understanding what they mean or why the regalia is like that is like… not good representation. It’s Really Bad Actually.
4 notes · View notes
wreckedhoney · 3 months ago
Text
cant fuck with fandom takes that defuck extremist characters. blorbo set fire to multiple buildings killed dozens and will do so again. every incident is accompanied by a rant about some warped issue or pathetic self perspective and a lot of bared teeth. then enough people who watched the same thing i watched will just.. not register that this is an angry personality. objectively bad and toxic. among other things. like suddenly seeing takes about this genuine asswipe being a normal chill person. where did u see this. what happened. where is my genuinely unwell off-putting blorbo. who the fuck is this
#many such cases. no disrespect to AU stuff and hc's and the like etc but this isn't about that#specifically now i saw a poor jinx take that's just the latest thing to act like a last straw for me with this stuff lol#she is not a foil in any way to silco fellas. her freak matches his freak. they make each other worse. theyre not normal.#the dynamic is so far from sanitized and this is one of the things that fictional literalism & the moral panic that accompanies it f'ed up#it didnt use to be such an issue that characters like jinx are just Like That bc jinx is a character from a show to be played with#we dont HAVE to justify her actions through lenses that adhere very strictly to reality bc it ISN'T real#it's a narrative that in bulk conveys “hey wana see something fucked up”#but from the trajectory of purity culture we canNOT be that loose or playful bc we HAVE to look thru lenses dictating that she's Real#or real-adjacent; ie. she reflects a real person in some creeping literal sense#so now if we LIKE her then she has to in some way be more palatable in the scope of rl acceptability. its so infuriating how this snowballs#let them be Fucked Up! fuck your narratives Up!! storytelling is PLAY not virtue signaling or a morality contest ESPECIALLY in fandoms#also YES they were meant to be portrayed as romantic originally and then they toned it down but the tones are still there. LET IT BE#IT'S! NOT! MEANT! TO! BE! NORMAL! OR ADHERENT TO A SCOPE OF REALISM. NONE OF THIS IS REAL HELLO H E L L O !!#SORRY i'm tired of pretending that the perspective towards storytelling getting a massive hit from purity culture isn't rly off-putting#or outright WORRYING. and fandoms are so weak compared to how it was before radfem language inserted itself into our spaces#SORRY to anyone who wasnt around enough before to know the difference. FFN & LJ used to fuck so hard and so did tmblr#it's harder to have as much fun i think as someone who was So around for that and seen in real time how it's changed now#fandom discourse
2 notes · View notes
zigzagspam · 7 months ago
Text
“Chihiro is trans fem” “Chihiro is trans masc” NO Chihiro is a cis guy and Mondo is a stealth trans man.
5 notes · View notes
sleepygaymerdisease · 8 months ago
Text
something ive noticed a lot in fantasy media is that the religions are either obviously evil/hyperbolized/meant to be mocked/etc or the gods are like Actually Real. which is honestly odd to me. especially the second one. like idk, as interesting as the concept can be i dont think that any religious figure needs to prove their existence (or that their existence has to be proven false) for the audience to take their impact on the characters or society seriously. like idk the way that religion is written to have a "correct" answer is really telling i guess
4 notes · View notes
dogwhizzer · 2 years ago
Text
i am GOING to write an essay on the transgender narrative of whizzer brown and i am going to publish it so help me god
28 notes · View notes
little-fandom-dump · 1 year ago
Text
can we. use our media literacy skills for five seconds and realize that it’s okay for different people to feel different ways about the season’s end. can you do that for me please.
16 notes · View notes
blueiight · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Coming slowly to know his evil, or being catapulted into it ... was all the same. I wanted none of it finally. And, deserving nothing better, I closed up like a spider in the flame of a match. And even Armand who was my constant companion, and my only companion, existed at a great distance from me, beyond that veil which separated me from all living things, a veil which was a form of shroud. (IWTV, 1976)
26 notes · View notes
ludinusdaleth · 9 months ago
Text
i try my absolute best to be nonbiased and withdrawn when discussing meta but sometimes you have to admit to biases you fight and orym is fascinating because he really is, even without any of his dark progression in story, the kind of guy i would end up getting into a fight with. i process grief faster than i should by just accepting shit happens (this is not a brag, im sure it's Bad, but ive experienced no ill effects so far), ive had my chance for justice (revenge) and know it fucking sucks and isnt worth it, i see big picture and find small picture problems tedious, and i hate people who try to be a bastion of explicitly Normal status quo morality. also he's clean shaven and an excercise nut. hes a great character but i would actually probably strangle him in real life
4 notes · View notes