#mobility-as-a-service market report

[ashimbisresearch]

Global Mobility-as-a-Service Market | BIS Research

According to BIS Research, the global mobility-as-a-service market was valued at $77,661.9 million in 2023, and it is expected to grow at a CAGR of 25.67% and reach $7,60,207.2 million by 2033 during the forecast period of 2023-2033.

[soumyafwr]

Mobile Medical Imaging Services Market Size, Analysis and Forecast 2031

[narwatharsh01]

Global Mobile Value-Added Services Market Analysis

Mobile Value-Added Services Market Overview

The global mobile value-added services (MVAS) market has experienced significant growth in recent years, driven by the increasing adoption of mobile devices and the rising demand for data-intensive applications. The Global MVAS market size reached a staggering USD 251.9 billion in 2023, and is projected to reach a phenomenal USD 733.83 billion by 2028, growing at a healthy Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 14.30%. Mobile VAS refers to a range of services offered by mobile network operators (MNOs) and content providers to enhance the user experience and generate additional revenue streams beyond basic voice and SMS services. Mobile VAS encompasses a wide range of services, including mobile entertainment (music, videos, games), mobile commerce (m-commerce), mobile banking, location-based services, and enterprise solutions. These services are delivered through various channels, such as SMS, MMS, mobile internet, and mobile applications, providing users with a diverse array of options to meet their evolving needs and preferences.

Visit this Link: Mobile Value-Added Services Market

Market Segmentation

The mobile VAS market can be segmented based on various factors, including service type, platform, and region:

By Service Type

Short Message Service (SMS): SMS remains a popular VAS, with billions of messages sent every day. It is widely used for content delivery, alerts, and interactive services.

Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS): MMS allows for the sending of multimedia content, such as images and videos, and is expected to see significant growth driven by the increasing adoption of smartphones and the demand for richer content experiences.

Mobile Internet: Mobile internet access is becoming increasingly popular, with users accessing the internet through their mobile devices for browsing, social media, and content streaming.

Mobile Music: Mobile music services, such as streaming and downloads, are expected to see significant growth, driven by the increasing popularity of music streaming platforms and the rise of mobile-first music consumption.

Mobile Gaming: Mobile gaming is becoming increasingly popular, with users accessing games through their mobile devices. The market is driven by the availability of high-quality games, the rise of mobile esports, and the increasing adoption of in-app purchases.

By Platform

Android: Android is the most popular mobile operating system, with a significant market share. It offers a wide range of VAS apps and services, catering to diverse user preferences and needs.

iOS: iOS is the operating system used by Apple devices, known for its security and user-friendly interface. It has a strong presence in the premium smartphone segment and offers a curated selection of VAS apps and services.

Windows: Windows is another popular mobile operating system, known for its compatibility with Microsoft products and enterprise-focused VAS offerings.

By Region

Asia-Pacific: The Asia-Pacific region is expected to dominate the mobile VAS market, driven by the large population, increasing adoption of mobile devices, and the rapid growth of mobile internet and digital content consumption. Countries like China, India, and Indonesia are key contributors to the regional market growth.

Europe: Europe is another significant region for mobile VAS, with a high penetration of mobile devices and a growing demand for advanced services. The region is characterized by a mature market with a focus on innovation and regulatory compliance.

Americas: The Americas region is also expected to see significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of mobile devices and data-intensive applications. The United States and Canada are the major contributors to the regional market, while Latin America presents opportunities for growth in emerging markets.

Click Here to Read More About: MVAS Industry

Market Drivers and Trends

Several factors are driving the growth of the mobile VAS market, including:

Increasing adoption of mobile devices: The increasing adoption of mobile devices, such as smartphones and tablets, is driving the growth of the mobile VAS market. The global smartphone penetration rate is expected to reach 79% by 2025.

Rising demand for data-intensive applications: The rising demand for data-intensive applications, such as video streaming and online gaming, is driving the growth of the mobile VAS market. Global mobile data traffic is expected to grow at a CAGR of 46% from 2022 to 2027.

Advancements in technology: Advancements in technology, such as 5G networks and artificial intelligence, are expected to drive the growth of the mobile VAS market. 5G is expected to enable new use cases and enhance the user experience for mobile VAS.

Increasing competition: The increasing competition among mobile operators is driving the growth of the mobile VAS market, as operators seek to differentiate themselves through the provision of VAS and enhance customer loyalty.

Regulatory changes: Regulatory changes, such as the introduction of new data protection laws and the promotion of digital inclusion, are shaping the mobile VAS market and driving the adoption of responsible and inclusive services.

Key Players and Recent Developments

The mobile VAS market is dominated by several key players, including:

Telkom Indonesia: Telkom Indonesia is a leading mobile operator in Indonesia, offering a wide range of VAS, including mobile entertainment, m-commerce, and enterprise solutions.

Bharti Airtel: Bharti Airtel is a leading mobile operator in India, offering a diverse portfolio of VAS, such as mobile music, mobile games, and mobile payments.

Verizon Communications: Verizon Communications is a leading mobile operator in the United States, offering a range of VAS, including mobile video, mobile security, and mobile workforce solutions.

Vodafone Group: Vodafone Group is a leading mobile operator in Europe, offering a wide range of VAS, such as mobile money, mobile health, and mobile IoT solutions.

These companies are investing heavily in network infrastructure, content partnerships, and new technologies to stay competitive in the rapidly evolving market. For example, Telkom Indonesia has partnered with Netflix to offer exclusive content packages to its subscribers.

Conclusion

The mobile VAS market continues to evolve rapidly, driven by technological advancements, increasing demand for data-intensive applications, and the need for personalized and engaging services. The future of mobile VAS looks promising, with a focus on enhancing user experience, expanding coverage, and leveraging new technologies like 5G and AI to meet the growing demands of consumers and businesses worldwide. As the market matures, key players will need to adapt their strategies to address emerging trends, such as the rise of over-the-top (OTT) services and the increasing importance of data privacy and security.

[mohitbisresearch]

The global mobility as a service market was estimated to be at $39.23 billion in 2021, which is expected to grow with a CAGR of 25.7% and reach $379.66 billion by 2031. The concept of Mobility-as-a-Service has its roots in the sharing economy and the proliferation of smartphones and mobile applications.

Enabled by advances in technology and connectivity, MaaS platforms aggregate diverse transportation options, including public transit, ride-hailing, bike-sharing, car-sharing, and even micro-mobility services like scooters and e-bikes. By providing users with a one-stop solution for planning, booking, and paying for multi-modal journeys, MaaS aims to enhance accessibility, convenience, and sustainability in urban transportation.

[pcplblogs]

A Guide to Outsourcing Mobile App Development

Outsourcing mobile app development can offer cost savings and access to specialized expertise, but it requires careful planning and management to ensure successful outcomes and maintain control over the project.

Mobile applications have become the essentials of modern business strategies. Whether you're a startup or an established enterprise, developing a mobile app can be a game-changer for your business. However, the journey from ideation to a fully functional app involves intricate processes, technical expertise, and considerable resources. This is where the concept of outsourcing to a Mobile app Development Company Ballarat emerges as a viable solution.

App development outsourcing refers to the practice of delegating the entire or specific phases of the mobile app development process to external service providers or development teams. Instead of managing an in-house team, companies collaborate with third-party vendors or offshore agencies to execute various tasks, including design, development, testing, and maintenance.

Reasons to Outsource Mobile app development service Texas

Of all the reasons that you should outsource the app development task to a professional company, that ones that are the primary ones are listed below.

Access to Specialized Skills- Outsourcing enables access to a global talent pool with diverse skill sets, including UI/UX design, programming languages, and platform expertise.

Cost Efficiency- Outsourcing often proves to be more cost-effective than maintaining an in-house team, as it eliminates overhead expenses such as infrastructure, salaries, and benefits.

Faster Time-to-Market- With dedicated teams working round-the-clock across different time zones, outsourcing can significantly accelerate the app development process, ensuring quicker delivery to market.

Focus on Core Competencies- By outsourcing non-core activities like app development, companies can redirect their internal resources and focus on core business functions, enhancing productivity and efficiency.

Evaluating the Costs of Outsourcing Mobile App Development

When considering outsourcing to a Mobile app Development Company Ballarat, it's essential to evaluate the costs involved comprehensively.

Factors to consider are

Development Rates- Different regions have varying hourly rates for app development services. Understanding these rates helps in budget estimation.

Project Scope- The complexity of your app, including features, functionalities, and integrations, directly impacts development costs.

Resource Allocation- Assessing the number of resources required for each phase of development, from design to deployment, aids in cost estimation.

Additional Expenses- Consider any additional expenses such as communication tools, project management software, or post-launch support.

Cost Comparison- In-House vs. Outsourced App Development

Comparing the costs of in-house development versus outsourcing Mobile app development service Texas is crucial for making informed decisions.

While in-house development may seem initially cost-effective, it often incurs hidden expenses over time.

Outsourcing, on the other hand, offers cost predictability and scalability. A detailed cost analysis considering factors like salaries, infrastructure, training, and project duration provides clarity on the cost-effectiveness of each approach.

What to Expect When You Are Planning to Outsource Mobile App Development

Outsourcing mobile app development introduces a collaborative ecosystem where your vision meets the expertise of external teams.

Expect

Transparent Processes- Clear communication channels, project milestones, and progress tracking mechanisms ensure transparency throughout the development lifecycle.

Quality Assurance- Rigorous testing protocols and quality assurance measures guarantee the delivery of a high-performing, bug-free mobile app.

Timely Delivery- Adherence to project timelines and milestones ensures timely delivery of the app, enabling you to seize market opportunities efficiently.

Post-Launch Support- Comprehensive post-launch support and maintenance services ensure the smooth functioning and continuous improvement of your mobile application.

Thus, outsourcing mobile app development offers a strategic approach to leverage external expertise, streamline costs, and accelerate time-to-market. Businesses can have a transformative journey to deliver innovative and user-centric mobile experiences by understanding the nuances of outsourcing, evaluating costs meticulously, and choosing the right partner.

[getmoretraffic]

Looking for small businesses SEO services? Get in touch with our digital marketing agency on the Gold Coast Get More Traffic.

[electronalytics]

Cellular or Mobile Telephone Services Market Analysis, Trends and Dynamic Demand by Forecast 2017 to 2032

The global cellular or mobile telephone services market refers to the industry that provides wireless communication services through mobile devices such as smartphones, tablets, and other handheld devices. This market includes services such as voice calling, messaging, data services, and mobile internet access.

The mobile phone services market has experienced significant growth in recent years due to the increasing adoption of smartphones and mobile internet services. This growth is expected to continue in the future, with the proliferation of 5G networks and the continued development of mobile technologies.

The global cellular or mobile telephone services market is also influenced by various factors such as regulatory policies, technological advancements, and consumer behavior. Some of the challenges faced by the industry include network congestion, cyber security threats, and data privacy concerns.

Overall, the global cellular or mobile telephone services market is a dynamic and rapidly evolving industry that is expected to continue growing and changing in the coming years. The global cellular/mobile telephone services market size is expected to grow to $281.03 billion in 2027 at a CAGR of 5.6%.

Get Full PDF Sample Copy of Report: https://stringentdatalytics.com/sample-request/cellular-or-mobile-telephone-services-market/73/

Market Segmentations: Global Cellular or Mobile Telephone Services Market: By Company • AT&T • Verizon • Deutsche Telekom • Vodafone • China Mobile • Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation • SoftBank Corp. • IBM • CisCo • Alcatel-Lucent • Juniper Networks • Tata, Nokia • Alibaba Group Holdings • Gemalto • Google • KongZhong Corporation. Global Cellular or Mobile Telephone Services Market: By Type • 3G • 4G • 5G Global Cellular or Mobile Telephone Services Market: By Application • Manufacturing • Energy and Utilities • Media and Entertainment • IT and Telecom • Transportation and Logistics • Medical Insurance Global Cellular or Mobile Telephone Services Market: Regional Analysis All the regional segmentation has been studied based on recent and future trends, and the market is forecasted throughout the prediction period. The countries covered in the regional analysis of the Global Cellular or Mobile Telephone Services market report are U.S., Canada, and Mexico in North America, Germany, France, U.K., Russia, Italy, Spain, Turkey, Netherlands, Switzerland, Belgium, and Rest of Europe in Europe, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, China, Japan, India, South Korea, Rest of Asia-Pacific (APAC) in the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Saudi Arabia, U.A.E, South Africa, Egypt, Israel, Rest of Middle East and Africa (MEA) as a part of Middle East and Africa (MEA), and Argentina, Brazil, and Rest of South America as part of South America.

Visit Report Page for More Details :  https://stringentdatalytics.com/reports/cellular-or-mobile-telephone-services-market/73/

Reasons to Purchase Global Cellular or Mobile Telephone Services Market • To gain insights into market trends and dynamics: this reports provide valuable insights into industry trends and dynamics, including market size, growth rates, and key drivers and challenges. • To identify key players and competitors: this research reports can help businesses identify key players and competitors in their industry, including their market share, strategies, and strengths and weaknesses. • To understand consumer behavior: this research reports can provide valuable insights into consumer behavior, including their preferences, purchasing habits, and demographics. • To evaluate market opportunities: this research reports can help businesses evaluate market opportunities, including potential new products or services, new markets, and emerging trends. • To make informed business decisions: this research reports provide businesses with data-driven insights that can help them make informed business decisions, including strategic planning, product development, and marketing and advertising strategies. Overall, market research reports provide businesses and organizations with valuable information that can help them make informed decisions and stay competitive in their industry. They can provide a solid foundation for business planning, strategy development, and decision-making.

Buy Now this Premium Report to Grow your Business : https://stringentdatalytics.com/purchase/cellular-or-mobile-telephone-services-market/73/?license=single

About US:

Stringent Datalytics offers both custom and syndicated market research reports. Custom market research reports are tailored to a specific client's needs and requirements. These reports provide unique insights into a particular industry or market segment and can help businesses make informed decisions about their strategies and operations.

Syndicated market research reports, on the other hand, are pre-existing reports that are available for purchase by multiple clients. These reports are often produced on a regular basis, such as annually or quarterly, and cover a broad range of industries and market segments. Syndicated reports provide clients with insights into industry trends, market sizes, and competitive landscapes. By offering both custom and syndicated reports, Stringent Datalytics can provide clients with a range of market research solutions that can be customized to their specific needs.

Contact US:

Stringent Datalytics

Contact No - 91-9763384149

Email Id -  sales@stringentdatalytics.com

Web - https://stringentdatalytics.com/

[ianduncankinnie]

I often post about Palestine but I'd like to take a moment to talk about what's happening in Bangladesh.

KEEP YOUR EYE ON BANGLADESH

TL;DR Students killed for protesting the government's quota system. Students are being arrested and murdered for speaking up about their deceased friends. Everyone is being threatened by the government and many social media platforms are being banned.

All I'm asking is to spread the word. Please. International pressure really works for our nation. We're dying here. UNICEF reports 34 children dead. There might be more. All reblogs and likes and shares are appreciated. Thank you. I guess I'll see you tomorrow.

Past

A movement protesting the government's quota system put forth by the father of our nation Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. This was placed in the first place to help the grandchildren of those who fought in the Liberation War of our country to get government jobs. We have a terrible job market here which is why many highly educated people leave the country. On 16th July, While protesting, a Student named Abu Sayed of Begum Rokeya University was killed by the police. This only stoked the feelings of injustice between the students.

During a press conference, the PM was asked about the quota for the grandchildren of veterans. Her response? "If we don't give jobs to the grandchildren of Veterans, will we give jobs to the grandchildren of Razakars?" Razakars are the people who collaborated with the Pakistani Forces to bring down the Bangladeshi freedom fighters. They betrayed the nation for their own gain.

Traitors.

Imagine calling the youth of your nation traitors.

Imagine calling almost 14 million young people who can't find a job despite their credentials betrayers.

Imagine cursing people who are protesting for job equality under a government with the all time highest corruption in the history of this nation.

On 17th July the broadband connection centre in Mohakhali was burned down. Mobile data services and communication were shut down by the PM. After 11 days the internet was properly restored.

On 19th July, A National Military Curfew was put in place by the Prime Minister to mitigate the unrest.

But that was last month. If you need details I highly recommend sources in Bangladesh like the Daily Star or reputable like Al Jazeera. The quota has since been lifted. Lives were lost. But it was for a good cause, right?

Right?

RIGHT?

Present

Well no. There's still a curfew in the capital. Several districts like Cumilla are still under attack. The government warns of not spreading misinformation yet still lie about the severity of the issue. The police are arresting those who protest as well as those who speak up. The students are demanding for the resignation of the PM. The PM obviously refuses to apologise or even acknowledge the deaths of some 147?

or is it 200?

They're not counting how many they're killing. They're not letting anyone else count either.

It is midnight here. This morning as in 4th August 2024, the students have called for a non cooperation movement. The Ruling Party Awami League will also be holding rallies across the nation tomorrow. I do not know what is going to happen to me. I do not want to think of what will happen to my family tomorrow. I don't really care. What I'm truly scared for is the future. As these protests do not end well here.

Future

Precedence says the PM will eventually resign. Every student protest of our nation has ended in momentary success.

Momentary

What comes after is usually a military regime. A caretaker government until a next government is chosen in a supposed election. Even then if they decide to hold an election. The caretaker government is usually run as a dictatorship. It was true for the 60s. It was true for the 90s. I don't doubt it will happen again.

I'm graduating next year. My niece is still new to the academic system. I wish her the best. My grandmas and grandpas are dead. Nobody left to pray for me. My aunts and uncles are growing old. My cousins can't speak up for fear. My mom is so tired. My dad is angry. I'm unsure if I will still be able to post the next couple of days.

All I'm asking is to spread the word. Please. International pressure really works for our nation. We're dying here. UNICEF reports 34 children dead. There might be more. All reblogs and likes and shares are appreciated. Thank you. I guess I'll see you tomorrow.

[whetstonefires]

After seeing your weatherbugapp reblog i installed duckduckgo and tried it.

I don't know much about technology tbh but i downloaded this app less than 30 mins ago and in that time google tried to track me 112 times?? And they tried to collect finger prints? And my first and last name? And my gender? And my country, state and city? My gps coordinates? My postal code? My network carrier? My fricking battery level for whatever reason? Can you please tell me if this is normal at all, because i'm freaking out right now. I just turned 18 and started using mobile banking and stuff and this shit scares me

Why tf does it need to know my screen density???my system volume????my charging status????? What tf are they cooking

Now it's at 476 tracking attempts bro???? barely 5 mins passed.....

I condensed your three asks into one for readability!

And yeah, I'm very far from an expert about any of this, but as far as I know that's just. Normal. That's the normal amount of spying they're doing on your phone. I assume the numbers we see are to some extent because having been foiled, a lot of these scripts try repeatedly, since I can't imagine what use thousands of trackers per phone would be even to the great aggregators.

Tracking the phone stuff like screen resolution and battery level is because (apart from that definitely not being considered remotely 'private' so it's Free Real Estate) in aggregate that data can be used to track what phone use patterns are like on a demographic scale and therefore. Where the smart money is.

Almost all of this is getting sold in bulk for ad targeting and market analysis. This does presumably make it very hard to notice when like. Actually important stuff is being spied on, which is why I feel better about Having Apps with the duckduckgo app blocker thing.

My bank's app reportedly sells data to a couple aggregators including Google. Not like, my banking info, but it's still so offensive on principle that I avoid using the app unless I have to, and force stop it afterward.

The patterns that show up on the weekly duckduckgo blocker report are interesting. Hoopla attempts about two orders of magnitude more tracking than Libby, which makes sense because they're a commercial streaming service libraries pay by the unit for access, while Libby is a content management software run by a corporation that values its certification as a 'B' company--that is, one invested in the public good that can be trusted. The cleanness of their brand is a great deal of its value, so they have to care about their image and be a little more scrupulous.

Which doesn't mean not being a little bit spyware, because everything is spyware now. Something else I've noticed is that in terms of free game apps, the polished professional stuff is now much more invasive than the random kinda janky thing someone just threw together.

Back in the day you tended to expect the opposite, because spyware was a marginal shifty profit-margin with too narrow a revenue stream to be worth more to an established brand than their reputation, but now that everyone does it there's not a lot of reputation cost and refraining would be sacrificing a potential revenue stream, which is Irresponsible Conduct for a corporation.

While meanwhile 'developing a free game app to put on the game store' is something a person can do for free with the hardware they already have for home use, as a hobby or practice or to put on their coding resume. So while such apps absolutely can be malicious and more dangerous when they are than The Big Brand, they can also be neutral in a way commercial stuff no longer is. Wild world.

But yeah for the most part as far as I can make out, these are just The Commercial Panopticon, operating as intended. It's gross but it probably doesn't indicate anything dangerous on an individual level.

[the-sun-station]

god damn I fucking hate ISPs dude

there's an ISP in my line of work that's been peddling "100x100 fiber anywhere in North America" and someone in my company, somehow, fucked around, fell for this scam, and started ordering this for problem sites.

we're now in the finding out phase where it turns out they're just fucking cellular modem resellers like you'd get from those terrible T-Mobile home internet ads??? we've had at least a couple dozen sites all report issues with internet speeds in the 256kbps range making the store non-functional.

their solution if their shitty resold SIM cards don't work? fucking Starlink, baybee. which they still market as fiber service in their sales material lmfao

[theculturedmarxist]

How the Neocons Subverted Russia’s Financial Stabilization in the Early 1990s

by Jeffrey Sachs

In 1989 I served as an advisor to the first post-communist government of Poland, and helped to devise a strategy of financial stabilization and economic transformation.  My recommendations in 1989 called for large-scale Western financial support for Poland’s economy in order to prevent a runaway inflation, enable a convertible Polish currency at a stable exchange rate, and an opening of trade and investment with the countries of the European Community (now the European Union).  These recommendations were heeded by the US Government, the G7, and the International Monetary Fund.  

Based on my advice, a $1 billion Zloty stabilization fund was established that served as the backing of Poland’s newly convertible currency.  Poland was granted a standstill on debt servicing on the Soviet-era debt, and then a partial cancellation of that debt.  Poland was granted significant development assistance in the form of grants and loans by the official international community.  

Poland’s subsequent economic and social performance speaks for itself.  Despite Poland’s economy having experienced a decade of collapse in the 1980s, Poland began a period of rapid economic growth in the early 1990s.  The currency remained stable and inflation low.  In 1990, Poland’s GDP per capita (measured in purchasing-power terms) was 33% of neighboring Germany.  By 2024, it had reached 68% of Germany’s GDP per capita, following decades of rapid economic growth. 

On the basis of Poland’s economic success, I was contacted in 1990 by Mr. Grigory Yavlinsky, economic advisor to President Mikhail Gorbachev, to offer similar advice to the Soviet Union, and in particular to help mobilize financial support for the economic stabilization and transformation of the Soviet Union. One outcome of that work was a 1991 project undertaken at the Harvard Kennedy School with Professors Graham Allison, Stanley Fisher, and Robert Blackwill. We jointly proposed a “Grand Bargain” to the US, G7, and Soviet Union, in which we advocated large-scale financial support by the US and G7 countries for Gorbachev’s ongoing economic and political reforms. The report was published as Window of Opportunity: The Grand Bargain for Democracy in the Soviet Union (1 October 1991).

The proposal for large-scale Western support for the Soviet Union was flatly rejected by the Cold Warriors in the White House.  Gorbachev came to the G7 Summit in London in July 1991 asking for financial assistance, but left empty-handed.  Upon his return to Moscow, he was abducted in the coup attempt of August 1991.  At that point, Boris Yeltsin, President of the Russian Federation, assumed effective leadership of the crisis-ridden Soviet Union.  By December, under the weight of decisions by Russia and other Soviet republics, the Soviet Union was dissolved with the emergence of 15 newly independent nations.  

In September 1991, I was contacted by Yegor Gaidar, economic advisor to Yeltsin, and soon to be acting Prime Minister of newly independent Russian Federation as of December 1991. He requested that I come to Moscow to discuss the economic crisis and ways to stabilize the Russian economy. At that stage, Russia was on the verge of hyperinflation, financial default to the West, the collapse of international trade with the other republics and with the former socialist countries of Eastern Europe, and intense shortages of food in Russian cities resulting from the collapse of food deliveries from the farmlands and the pervasive black marketing of foodstuffs and other essential commodities.  

I recommended that Russia reiterate the call for large-scale Western financial assistance, including an immediate standstill on debt servicing, longer-term debt relief, a currency stabilization fund for the ruble (as for the Zloty in Poland), large-scale grants of dollars and European currencies to support urgently needed food and medical imports and other essential commodity flows, and immediate financing by the IMF, World Bank, and other institutions to protect Russia’s social services (healthcare, education, and others).

In November 1991, Gaidar met with the G7 Deputies (the deputy finance ministers of the G7 countries) and requested a standstill on debt servicing.  This request was flatly denied.  To the contrary, Gaidar was told that unless Russia continued to service every last dollar as it came due, emergency food aid on the high seas heading to Russia would be immediately turned around and sent back to the home ports.  I met with an ashen-faced Gaidar immediately after the G7 Deputies meeting.  

In December 1991, I met with Yeltsin in the Kremlin to brief him on Russia’s financial crisis and on my continued hope and advocacy for emergency Western assistance, especially as Russia was now emerging as an independent, democratic nation after the end of the Soviet Union.  He requested that I serve as an advisor to his economic team, with a focus on attempting to mobilize the needed large-scale financial support.  I accepted that challenge and the advisory position on a strictly unpaid basis.    

Upon returning from Moscow, I went to Washington to reiterate my call for a debt standstill, a currency stabilization fund, and emergency financial support.  In my meeting with Mr. Richard Erb, Deputy Managing Director of the IMF in charge of overall relations with Russia, I learned that the US did not support this kind of financial package.  I once again pleaded the economic and financial case, and was determined to change US policy.  It had been my experience in other advisory contexts that it might require several months to sway Washington on its policy approach.  

Indeed, during 1991-94 I would advocate non-stop but without success for large-scale Western support for Russia’s crisis-ridden economy, and support for the other 14 newly independent states of the former Soviet Union. I made these appeals in countless speeches, meetings, conferences, op-eds, and academic articles. Mine was a lonely voice in the US in calling for such support.  I had learned from economic history — most importantly the crucial writings of John Maynard Keynes (especially Economic Consequences of the Peace, 1919) — and from my own advisory experiences in Latin America and Eastern Europe, that external financial support for Russia could well be the make or break of Russia’s urgently needed stabilization effort.  

It is worth quoting at length here from my article in the Washington Post in November 1991 to present the gist of my argument at the time:  

This is the third time in this century in which the West must address the vanquished. When the German and Hapsburg Empires collapsed after World War I, the result was financial chaos and social dislocation. Keynes predicted in 1919 that this utter collapse in Germany and Austria, combined with a lack of vision from the victors, would conspire to produce a furious backlash towards military dictatorship in Central Europe. Even as brilliant a finance minister as Joseph Schumpeter in Austria could not stanch the torrent towards hyperinflation and hyper-nationalism, and the United States descended into the isolationism of the 1920s under the "leadership" of Warren G. Harding and Sen. Henry Cabot Lodge. After World War II, the victors were smarter. Harry Truman called for U.S. financial support to Germany and Japan, as well as the rest of Western Europe. The sums involved in the Marshall Plan, equal to a few percent of the recipient countries' GNPs, was not enough to actually rebuild Europe. It was, though, a political lifeline to the visionary builders of democratic capitalism in postwar Europe. Now the Cold War and the collapse of communism have left Russia as prostrate, frightened and unstable as was Germany after World War I and World War II. Inside Russia, Western aid would have the galvanizing psychological and political effect that the Marshall Plan had for Western Europe. Russia's psyche has been tormented by 1,000 years of brutal invasions, stretching from Genghis Khan to Napoleon and Hitler. Churchill judged that the Marshall Plan was history's "most unsordid act," and his view was shared by millions of Europeans for whom the aid was the first glimpse of hope in a collapsed world. In a collapsed Soviet Union, we have a remarkable opportunity to raise the hopes of the Russian people through an act of international understanding. The West can now inspire the Russian people with another unsordid act.

This advice went unheeded, but that did not deter me from continuing my advocacy.  In early 1992, I was invited to make the case on the PBS news show The McNeil-Lehrer Report.  I was on air with acting Secretary of State Lawrence Eagleburger.  After the show, he asked me to ride with him from the PBS studio in Arlington, Virginia back to Washington, D.C.  Our conversation was the following.  “Jeffrey, please let me explain to you that your request for large-scale aid is not going to happen.  Even assuming that I agree with your arguments — and Poland’s finance minister [Leszek Balcerowicz] made the same points to me just last week — it’s not going to happen.  Do you want to know why?  Do you know what this year is?”  “1992,” I answered.  “Do you know that this means?”  “An election year?” I replied.  “Yes, this is an election year.  It’s not going to happen.”

Russia’s economic crisis worsened rapidly in 1992.  Gaidar lifted price controls at the start of 1992, not as some purported miracle cure but because the Soviet-era official fixed prices were irrelevant under the pressures of the black markets, the repressed inflation (that is, rapid inflation in the black-market prices and therefore the rising the gap with the official prices), the complete breakdown of the Soviet-era planning mechanism, and the massive corruption engendered by the few goods still being exchanged at the official prices far below the black-market prices.  

Russia urgently needed a stabilization plan of the kind that Poland had undertaken, but such a plan was out of reach financially (because of the lack of external support) and politically (because the lack of external support also meant the lack of any internal consensus on what to do).  The crisis was compounded by the collapse of trade among the newly independent post-Soviet nations and the collapse of trade between the former Soviet Union and its former satellite nations in Central and Eastern Europe, which were now receiving Western aid and were reorienting trade towards Western Europe and away from the former Soviet Union.  

During 1992 I continued without any success to try to mobilize the large-scale Western financing that I believed to be ever-more urgent.  I pinned my hopes on the newly elected Presidency of Bill Clinton. These hopes too were quickly dashed. Clinton’s key advisor on Russia, Johns Hopkins Professor Michael Mandelbaum, told me privately in November 1992 that the incoming Clinton team had rejected the concept of large-scale assistance for Russia. Mandelbaum soon announced publicly that he would not serve in the new administration. I met with Clinton’s new Russia advisor, Strobe Talbott, but discovered that he was largely unaware of the pressing economic realities. He asked me to send him some materials about hyperinflations, which I duly did.

At the end of 1992, after one year of trying to help Russia, I told Gaidar that I would step aside as my recommendations were not heeded in Washington or the European capitals.  Yet around Christmas Day I received a phone call from Russia’s incoming financing minister, Mr. Boris Fyodorov. He asked me to meet him in Washington in the very first days of 1993.  We met at the World Bank. Fyodorov, a gentleman and highly intelligent expert who tragically died young a few years later, implored me to remain as an advisor to him during 1993.  I agreed to do so, and spent one more year attempting to help Russia implement a stabilization plan. I resigned in December 1993, and publicly announced my departure as advisor in the first days of 1994.  

My continued advocacy in Washington once again fell on deaf ears in the first year of the Clinton Administration, and my own forebodings became greater.  I repeatedly invoked the warnings of history in my public speaking and writing, as in this piece in the New Republic in January 1994, soon after I had stepped aside from the advisory role.      

Above all, Clinton should not console himself with the thought that nothing too serious can happen in Russia. Many Western policymakers have confidently predicted that if the reformers leave now, they will be back in a year, after the Communists once again prove themselves unable to govern. This might happen, but chances are it will not. History has probably given the Clinton administration one chance for bringing Russia back from the brink; and it reveals an alarmingly simple pattern. The moderate Girondists did not follow Robespierre back into power. With rampant inflation, social disarray and falling living standards, revolutionary France opted for Napoleon instead. In revolutionary Russia, Aleksandr Kerensky did not return to power after Lenin's policies and civil war had led to hyperinflation. The disarray of the early 1920s opened the way for Stalin's rise to power. Nor was Bruning'sgovernment given another chance in Germany once Hitler came to power in 1933.

It is worth clarifying that my advisory role in Russia was limited to macroeconomic stabilization and international financing.  I was not involved in Russia’s privatization program which took shape during 1993-4, nor in the various measures and programs (such as the notorious “shares-for-loans” scheme in 1996) that gave rise to the new Russian oligarchs.  On the contrary, I opposed the various kinds of measures that Russia was undertaking, believing them to be rife with unfairness and corruption.  I said as much in both the public and in private to Clinton officials, but they were not listening to me on that account either.  Colleagues of mine at Harvard were involved in the privatization work, but they assiduously kept me far away from their work. Two were later charged by the US government with insider dealing in activities in Russia which I had absolutely no foreknowledge or involvement of any kind.  My only role in that matter was to dismiss them from the Harvard Institute for International Development for violating the internal HIID rules against conflicts of interest in countries that HIID advised.  

The failure of the West to provide large-scale and timely financial support to Russia and the other newly independent nations of the former Soviet Union definitely exacerbated the serious economic and financial crisis that faced those countries in the early 1990s.  Inflation remained very high for several years.  Trade and hence economic recovery were seriously impeded.  Corruption flourished under the policies of parceling out valuable state assets to private hands.  

All of these dislocations gravely weakened the public trust in the new governments of the region and the West. This collapse in social trust brought to my mind at the time the adage of Keynes in 1919, following the disaster Versailles settlement and the hyperinflations that followed: “There is no subtler, no surer means of over- turning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and it does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.” 

During the tumultuous decade of the 1990s, Russia’s social services fell into decline.  When this decline was coupled with the greatly increased stresses on society, the result was a sharp rise in Russia’s alcohol-related deaths.  Whereas in Poland, the economic reforms were accompanied by a rise in life expectancy and public health, the very opposite occurred in crisis-riven Russia.  

Even with all of these economic debacles, and with Russia’s default in 1998, the grave economic crisis and lack of Western support were not the definitive breaking points of US-Russian relations.  In 1999, when Vladimir Putin became Prime Minister and in 2000 when he became President, Putin sought friendly and mutually supportive international relations between Russia and the West.  Many European leaders, for example, Italy’s Romano Prodi, have spoken extensively about Putin’s goodwill and positive intentions towards strong Russia-EU relations in the first years of his presidency.  

It was in military affairs rather than in economics that the Russian – Western relations ended up falling apart in the 2000s.  As with finance, the West was militarily dominant in the 1990s, and certainly had the means to promote strong and positive relations with Russia.  Yet the US was far more interested in Russia’s subservience to NATO that it was in stable relations with Russia.  

At the time of German reunification, both the US and Germany repeatedly promised Gorbachev and then Yeltsin that the West would not take advantage of German reunification and the end of the Warsaw Pact by expanding the NATO military alliance eastward.  Both Gorbachev and Yeltsin reiterated the importance of this US-NATO pledge.  Yet within just a few years, Clinton completely reneged on the Western commitment, and began the process of NATO enlargement.  Leading US diplomats, led by the great statesman-scholar George Kennan, warned at the time that the NATO enlargement would lead to disaster: “The view, bluntly stated, is that expanding NATO would be the most fateful error of American policy in the entire post-cold-war era.” So, it has proved.

Here is not the place to revisit all of the foreign policy disasters that have resulted from US arrogance towards Russia, but it suffices here to mention a brief and partial chronology of key events.  In 1999, NATO bombed Belgrade for 78 days with the goal of breaking Serbia apart and giving rise to an independent Kosovo, now home to a major NATO base in the Balkans.  In 2002, the US unilaterally withdrew from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty over Russia’s strenuous objections.  In 2003, the US and NATO allies repudiated the UN Security Council by going to war in Iraq on false pretenses.  In 2004, the US continued with NATO enlargement, this time to the Baltic States and countries in the Black Sea region (Bulgaria and Romania) and the Balkans.  In 2008, over Russia’s urgent and strenuous objections, the US pledged to expand NATO to Georgia and Ukraine.  

In 2011, the US tasked the CIA to overthrow Syria’s Bashar al-Assad, an ally of Russia.  In 2011, NATO bombed Libya in order to overthrow Moammar Qaddafi.  In 2014, the US conspired with Ukrainian nationalist forces to overthrow Ukraine’s President Viktor Yanukovych.  In 2015, the US began to place Aegis anti-ballistic missiles in Eastern Europe(Romania), a short distance from Russia. In 2016-2020, the US supported Ukraine in undermining the Minsk II agreement, despite its unanimous backing by the UN Security Council.  In 2021, the new Biden Administration refused to negotiate with Russia over the question of NATO enlargement to Ukraine.  In April 2022, the US called on Ukraine to withdraw from peace negotiations with Russia.  

Looking back on the events around 1991-93, and to the events that followed, it is clear that the US was determined to say no to Russia’s aspirations for peaceful and mutually respectful integration of Russia and the West.  The end of the Soviet period and the beginning of the Yeltsin Presidency occasioned the rise of the neoconservatives (neocons) to power in the United States. The neocons did not and do not want a mutually respectful relationship with Russia.  They sought and until today seek a unipolar world led by a hegemonic US, in which Russia and other nations will be subservient.  

In this US-led world order, the neocons envisioned that the US and the US alone will determine the utilization of the dollar-based banking system, the placement of overseas US military bases, the extent of NATO membership, and the deployment of US missile systems, without any veto or say by other countries, certainly including Russia.  That arrogant foreign policy has led to several wars and to a widening rupture of relations between the US-led bloc of nations and the rest of the world.  As an advisor to Russia during two years, late-1991 to late-93, I experienced first-hand the early days of neoconservatism applied to Russia, though it would take many years of events afterwards to recognize the full extent of the new and dangerous turn in US foreign policy that began in the early 1990s.    

[narwatharsh01]

A Look at Key Players in the Mobile Value-Added Services Market

The mobile phone has transcended its original purpose of voice communication. Today, smartphones are handheld portals to a vast ecosystem of services that extend far beyond basic calls and texts. This realm of additional offerings is known as the Mobile Value-Added Services (MVAS) market, and it's experiencing phenomenal growth.

At the core of the MVAS market are the companies that develop and deliver these services. This landscape is a dynamic mix of established players and innovative startups, all vying to provide users with experiences that enhance their mobile lives. Let's delve into the key segments of this market and explore some of the major companies shaping its future.

Mobile Network Operators (MNOs): The Traditional Powerhouses

MNOs, the familiar names we associate with mobile subscriptions, have been major forces in the MVAS market since its inception. They leverage their existing subscriber base and billing infrastructure to offer a variety of value-added services. These can include:

Messaging Services: SMS, MMS, and even premium messaging for special content or alerts.

Mobile Entertainment: Music and video downloads, ringtones, mobile games.

Location-Based Services: Navigation apps, weather updates, traffic alerts, and even targeted advertising based on user location.

Mobile Financial Services: Mobile banking, mobile wallets, and airtime top-up options.

To Know more about: Mobile Value-Added Services Industry

MNOs like AT&T, Verizon, Vodafone, and China Mobile are some of the biggest players in this segment. They benefit from a large and established subscriber base, allowing them to offer economies of scale for their MVAS. However, competition from niche players and the rise of app stores are forcing them to innovate and adapt their offerings.

Content and Application Providers: The Innovation Engine

The rise of smartphones and app stores has fueled the emergence of a new breed of MVAS providers – content and application developers. These companies specialize in creating engaging and valuable mobile applications that cater to a wide range of user needs. Some prominent examples include:

Gaming Companies: Developers like King (Candy Crush) and Rovio (Angry Birds) have created billion-dollar businesses through freemium mobile gaming models with in-app purchases.

Entertainment Apps: Streaming services like Netflix and Spotify offer subscription-based access to content on mobile devices.

Click Here to Know More About: Mobile Value-Added Services Industry    

Social Media Platforms: Companies like Facebook and Snapchat provide free-to-use communication and social networking features that generate revenue through advertising.

Financial Technology (FinTech) Companies: Startups like PayPal and Venmo are revolutionizing mobile payments and creating new MVAS opportunities in the financial sector.

Content and application providers bring a fresh wave of innovation to the MVAS market. Their focus on user experience and engagement is driving the development of cutting-edge services that cater to evolving user demands.

The Rise of Aggregators and Enablers

A third category of companies is emerging in the MVAS space – aggregators and enablers. These players act as intermediaries between content providers, MNOs, and users. They provide the technological infrastructure and platforms that allow for seamless delivery and monetization of MVAS. Some of the key functions performed by aggregators include:

Payment Processing: Securely handling transactions for in-app purchases, subscriptions, and mobile payments.

Content Delivery Networks (CDNs): Ensuring smooth and efficient delivery of content like music, videos, and games to mobile devices.

Marketing and Analytics: Providing targeted advertising solutions and user behavior insights to MVAS providers.

Companies like InMobi and Comviva are prominent players in this space. By streamlining the process of delivering and monetizing MVAS, they play a crucial role in enabling the growth of the entire ecosystem.

The Future of MVAS: Personalization and Emerging Technologies

As the MVAS Industry continues to evolve, several key trends are shaping its future:

Hyper-Personalization: MVAS providers will leverage user data and artificial intelligence to deliver highly personalized services and content recommendations.

The Rise of 5G: Faster and more reliable internet connectivity through 5G networks will open doors for new and immersive MVAS experiences like augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) applications.

Focus on Security and Privacy: With increasing concerns about data security, MVAS providers will need to prioritize user privacy and implement robust security measures.

The MVAS market is a dynamic and ever-changing landscape. By understanding the key players and trends, we can gain valuable insights into how mobile technology will continue to enhance and enrich our lives in the years to come.

[mohitbisresearch]

The global mobility as a service market was estimated to be at $39.23 billion in 2021, which is expected to grow with a CAGR of 25.7% and reach $379.66 billion by 2031.

The growth in the global mobility as a service market is expected to be driven by rising urbanization and smart city initiatives, increasing adoption of on-demand mobility services, the growing trend of smart mobility with better in-vehicle facilities, and increasing parking problems, and emphasis on reducing CO2 emissions.

[absolutebl]

BL Streaming - Which Service is Worth Your Money?

I’m bored and I have a little extra time this morning so it’s time for ABL to play with the spreadsheet of doom. 

Occasionally I get the question: 

If I were to subscribe to only one platform for BL which should I pick? 

This post is dated May 2023. 

First things first. I am going to be (somewhat) objective about this and not judge on quality of content. Because if KinnPorsche is all you love in life, obvs you need iQIYI, but if you are a HIStory franchise stan, than it’s all about Viki. Those are your life choices, I’m just here to play numbers games, okay? 

Secondly, some shows air on multiple platforms, particularly Viki & Gaga, but sometimes it’s Gaga & YouTube, occasionally it’s even iQIYI + others. This has only started happening in the last few years. Bed Friend was on 3 different platforms (GaGa, iQIYI, YT) - even though it was originally announced for Viki! I honestly don’t know how to track this, so I tend to log the spreadsheet with my preferred watching platform for that language, this will throw the numbers off for those platforms. 

Since I join everything my platform preference choice is based on:  

the quality of the subs/captions   

the quality of the user experience  

My subs experience tends to be: 

YT = best for Thai

Viki = best for Korean and sometimes Japanese, okay for Thai

Gaga = best for Chinese and sometimes Japanese but very weak Thai subs

My user interface preference is: 

YT, Viki, Gaga in that order then everyone else with iQIYI at the bottom. This is because I watch on mobile devices. 

ASplay, WeTV, former Line, Amarin TV, Netflix and the other smaller suppliers (and apps) will all be grouped together for this assessment. Since they have so few offerings, by default I would not recommend subbing those platforms unless you are a hard stan of all BL with disposable income. 

Super bad BLs that I watched back in the day on grey sites or YT (pre 2020 crack down) because there were no other options and I am a completest are still listed as grey. I would never suggest anyone watch these shows anyway, so I don’t care if they have now shown up on legitimate sites. If they are somewhere, it’s likely Gaga. Which means Gaga’s percentage of the market share is probably UNDER reported by my numbers. 

Movies and cinema-only releases that never got international distribution fall into the “grey” category. If I got it off an indie subber, since that too is technically illegal, it falls into the grey category as well. 

Final note: This is from a USA based IP, I don’t use a VPN, so platforms assessments are from that perspective. 

Spring 2023, current state of the spreadsheet. AKA 

Our BL Data Set 

Total # of BLs = 564

# of BLs ongoing (so finished runtime is best guess) = 18 

Just Answer the Damn Question 

Round Number of Actual BLs - % of market share

YouTube = 218 - 38.6%

Gaga = 148 - 26.2% 

Viki = 77 - 13.7% 

Grey = 53 - 9.4% 

BLs I’ve never been able to find on any platform (including grey): 36 - 6.4% 

iQIYI = 14 - 2.5% 

Other platforms = 12 - 2.2% 

Margin of error: +- 1% (look I’m just not driven to be that accurate here)

Subscription Platforms Breakdown  - % of market share

Eliminating YouTube, Grey, and missing BLs. Viki is included because I do not know which of theirs are behind the paywall and which are not. 

Total subscribe-only BLs: 257 

Gaga = 59%

Viki = 30%

iQIYI = 6%

Sml sites/apps = 5%

(rounded) 

Okay but how about actual runtime? 

Gaga = 360 hrs - 44% 

Viki = 311 hrs - 38% 

iQIYI = 98 hrs - 12% 

Sml sites = 50 hrs - 6%

Anyway you cut it... on pure BL standards...

GAGAOOLALA WINS 

Other consideration? In most places Gaga is ALSO the cheapest per month option. 

Final Thoughts

YouTube (America’s Alphabet) 

YT has the most pieces of content and longest overall runtime because of all the Thai stuff. ALSO bootlegs show up there, especially the early Chinese and Japanese stuff. They will often get taken down and you have to hunt for it again. YT takedowns come in waves, every 6 months or so.

However, GMMTV, some Star Hunter, some Studio Wabi Sabi, all the Vietnamese & Pinoy stuff (until now), and a few choice bits of Strongberry are YT content.

YT’s app is the best UX of a poor set (for me), but the web based YT at Premium level doesn’t work with Firefox. I use YT for work A LOT, so the fee for Premium ($13.99) and lack of ads + downloads (travel) is worth it for me, but I think it probubly isn’t if you’re on a budget. 

GaGaOOLaLa (Taiwan’s Portico Media) 

Of the pay to play platforms, GaGa dominates with the most BLs by all metrics. If you’re intersted in darker BL, GL and other queer content, very high heat, the history of the genre, or Japanese stuff - most of that is on GaGa. Also all of Strongberry and some of the newer queerer series (like My Ride).  

At $6.99 a month it’s ALSO one of the cheapest options. 

Gaga is based out of Taiwan, the only Asian country with marriage equality (as of 2022) AND it specializes in exclusively queer content so they need our support. If you can afford them, you should support them. GaGa is the only platform that will always have more BL, guaranteed (so long as Taiwan is autonomous). Ironically, you can follow their YT channel for previews and teasers to their latest series, short content, and acquisitions. 

Their app isn’t great, but their web-based interface is fine. That said: there’s no categories (way to organize), and the way they roll out new episodes is unintuitive. Their mobile app ALWAYS pauses not mater what you actually want it to do and the lack of the quick skip ahead is frustrating. 

Viki (Japan’s Rakutan)

Viki specializes in longer series, mostly Thai, Taiwanese, and a few of the Chinese bromances. It also now has a lot of KBLs. But in general only more recent stuff (2018 is as far back as they go).

At $4.99-$11.99 depending, it’s low to average cost. I’m not sure which one (if any) you actually need for BL. Most of my favorite new shows tend to air on Viki, and I like Rakutan as a parent company, so I don’t mind supporting them. 

They happen to have 5 of my top ten BLs, which is A LOT (since I hand out 10/10 so rarely). So for me they host the objective best BL content. 

They have the second best app (after YT, it’s kinda a combo of YT + Netflix) but the lack of a speed-up option is frustrating for many. Also the desktop version is super buggy. But they DO have categories you can name and control, which I love.

Other Platforms 

iQIYI - is Mainland China based (hello Baidu, you ugly fucker), so the platform getting/pimping BL for an international audience only is… how do I put this?… oh yeah: shitty. I will often rename it Icky, for this reason. It clearly wants to break the market, but… do we want it in the market at all? How long will they host BLs? When will they be shut down and censored? I would say it’s only worth it if you really also like Chinese dramas. And even so, Viki also has A LOT of those. Unfortunately for us, Wabi Sabi seems to have cut a distribution deal with Icky. And, of course, there is the KinnPorsche situation (so ironic that Icky hosts the highest heat). The interface is a nightmare. They have the WORST app, even when you pay, it serves ads, some of which alpha crash the platform. 

Netflix - here in the states it almost never has new BL content. Sometimes some old stuff. They tested the waters with SOTUS and Love Sick. I have a feeling they aren’t particularly intersted in this market. So if BL is what you watch, don’t bother. At last check they still had Gameboys and Your Name Engraved Herein and Wish You. 

WeTV - acts like LineTV used to, has Manner of Death and We Best Love and a few of the more obscure Thai pulps. But probably not worth it for anyone but a completest. 

Grey - Unknown or No Distributor 

Indie subbers: there’s some BLs that you can watch by supporting indie subbers who supply private links to their personal versions. This is not legal, but it is a slightly nicer way to get stuff you can’t find anywhere else. I’ve done this for some Thai and Japanese stuff.

I find the leads for these sources here on Tumblr. If someone is giffing and talking about a show and I don’t know how they are getting hold of it, I simply ask.

DramaCool (USA) & Dailymotion (France) & Bilibili (China) and others - AKA the grey space. You SHOULD feel guilty using these sites, you’re stealing, but it’s where many of us go for BL we can’t find anywhere else (in defiance of what few morals we have left). These are BLs that originally sold to very odd platforms or never got international distribution. Unfortunately, some of my favorites are in this category like Great Men Academy or Seven Days. It’s a nightmare. The ads are terrible and the virus/bug risk is high. They get taken down all the time. Or the leads are faked. I use an old computer to access and suggest you take all necessary precautions yourself.

P’ABL SOAP BOX TIME

Look I work tangential to the entertainment industry, so if you thought I wasn’t going to learn you a little on this subject, you got another think coming. 

HERE’S THE THING: 

You watch a show on one of the grey platforms, ESPECIALLY if it actually has distribution on Gaga or Viki - you better review that shit. You spread the word and advocate for that content here, on MDL, on social media, with fan art, I don’t care. You steal it, you find a way to pay back in your time and/or creativity. 

I get it if you’re poor, but don’t be a goddamn scab. Find a way to reward content creators with non-monetary support. If you had the time to watch the thing you stole, you have time to pay it forward in some substantial way. Do this even if you didn’t steal it but got it for free. Do this if you read fanfic. Do this with articles, blogs, books. Do this with podcasts. 

It isn’t hard to be a decent human and support creators. Don’t you dare just TAKE. If you’re that kind of person stop reading this blog immediately. I don’t want anything to do with you and you don’t deserve my words or my spreadsheet of Doom. 

/rant 

MORE ON THIS TOPIC WITH FOLLOW UP QUESTIONS

Original post on this subject that I adapted for this post. 

(source)

[pcplblogs]

Taking Resort To Data Analytics And Reporting For Making Informed Business Decisions

Data analytics and reporting are crucial for informed decision-making and it is ideal to go for custom ERP solutions to integrate data analytics seamlessly into business operations.

Staying ahead of the curve needs a business owner to have something more than intuition and experience. It demands data-driven insights that empower decision-makers to make informed choices, mitigate risks, and capitalize on opportunities. This is where Data Analytics and Reporting California play an important role, revolutionizing the way businesses operate and strategize for growth.

The Power of Data Analytics and Reporting

Data analytics involves the process of analyzing, interpreting, and deriving actionable insights from raw data. Businesses can uncover patterns, trends, and correlations within their datasets by leveraging advanced analytics techniques such as predictive modeling, machine learning, and data visualization.

These insights, in turn, enable organizations to

Enhance Decision-Making- Data-driven decision-making minimizes guesswork and reliance on gut instinct. By basing decisions on empirical evidence and statistical analysis, businesses can optimize operations, streamline processes, and allocate resources more effectively.

Identify Opportunities- Data analytics enables businesses to identify emerging market trends, customer preferences, and untapped opportunities. By understanding consumer behavior and market dynamics, organizations can develop targeted strategies to capitalize on market trends and gain a competitive edge.

Mitigate Risks- Analyzing historical data and identifying potential risk factors allows businesses to mitigate risks and anticipate future challenges proactively. Whether it's predicting market volatility, detecting fraudulent activities, or assessing supply chain disruptions, data analytics empowers businesses to navigate uncertainties with confidence.

Optimize Performance- By monitoring key performance indicators (KPIs) and conducting performance analysis, businesses can identify areas for improvement and optimize operational efficiency. Whether it's optimizing production processes, reducing downtime, or enhancing customer service, data-driven insights drive continuous improvement initiatives.

While the benefits of Data Analytics and Reporting California are undeniable, many businesses struggle to harness their full potential due to disparate systems, data silos, and lack of expertise. This is where custom ERP software development companies come into play.

These companies specialize in Custom ERP Software Development Bendigo that integrates seamlessly with existing systems and enables businesses to leverage the power of data analytics and reporting.

Custom software development companies can help by offering

Customized Solutions- Custom ERP software development companies understand that every business is unique, with its own set of challenges and requirements. They work closely with businesses to understand their specific needs and develop customized ERP solutions that address their pain points and align with their strategic objectives.

Integration and Data Migration- Integrating disparate systems and migrating data from legacy systems to a unified ERP platform can be daunting. Custom ERP software development companies have the expertise and experience to seamlessly integrate various systems and ensure smooth data migration, minimizing disruptions and downtime.

Advanced Analytics Capabilities- Custom ERP solutions can be equipped with advanced analytics capabilities, including predictive modeling, data visualization, and real-time reporting. By incorporating these features, businesses can derive actionable insights from their data and make informed decisions in real-time.

Scalability and Flexibility- As businesses grow and evolve, their ERP requirements also change. Custom ERP software development companies design scalable and flexible solutions that can adapt to evolving business needs and accommodate future growth seamlessly.

Thus, data analytics and reporting are indispensable tools for businesses looking to gain a competitive edge in today's data-driven economy. Whether it's optimizing operations, identifying opportunities, or mitigating risks, the power of data analytics knows no bounds when coupled with the right Custom ERP Software Development Bendigo tailored to your business needs.