#madame de tourvel

[lady-arryn]

DANGEROUS LIAISONS costumes appreciation: 12/∞ (costume design by James Acheson)

[perioddramapolls]

Period drama's dresses tournament: White dresses Round 1- Group C: Catherine of Russia, The great (2) (gifset) vs Marie de Tourvel, Dangerous liaisons (gifset)

[meerawrites]

Antagonist

@writeblrgarden

I do not talk about him a lot because the Marquise de Merteuil takes up so much room in the story and narrative and is such a driving force of manipulation and libertineism (affectionate and derogatory) and bisexuality-biromanticism, but, for your viewing pleasure, the Vicomte de Valmont, the notorious bi blackguard being the worst man on earth.

[costumeloverz71]

Madame de Tourvel (Michelle Pfeiffer) Yellow dress.. Dangerous Liasons (1988).. Costume by James Acheson.

[muadweeb]

big brained shit.....

[recycledmoviecostumes]

More Halloween thrills and chills are on the way—make sure to follow us daily for new Halloween-related costume posts all month long! In the beloved 1993 Halloween classic 𝑯𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒔 𝑷𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒔, Vanessa Shaw’s character wore this incredible peach robe à la française to her parents’ Halloween Party. However, this piece did not originate with 𝑯𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒔 𝑷𝒐𝒄𝒖𝒔! It was initially designed by James Acheson for Michelle Pfeiffer as Madame De Tourvel in the 1988 film 𝑫𝒂𝒏𝒈𝒆𝒓𝒐𝒖𝒔 𝑳𝒊𝒂𝒊𝒔𝒐𝒏𝒔. Find out where else this costume has been used at bit.ly/StuGeo069

[riotgrrrlhole]

Dangerous Liasons could work for Lacho and then the ultimate couple is Laloward cause lalo gotta seduce Howard as a bet to Nacho

Okay so I got great expectations = McWexler

Wuthering Heights = Lacho

Fight club = Laloward + Jimmy

The godfather = laloward cause f it Sonny and Tom banged and I know it

Anna Karenina = ????

Dangerous Liasons = ???

Trainspotting =???

The portrait of Dorian Gray =?????

[majestativa]

But your real mistake is to have allowed yourself to enter into correspondence with her. I defy you now to predict where this will lead. Are you by any chance hoping to prove to this woman by logic that she must give herself to you? It seems to me this can only be a sentimental and not a demonstrable truth, and that, in order to make it acceptable, you have to move her, not argue with her. What good would it do you to move her by writing letters, seeing you will not be there to take advantage of it? Even though your fine words may have an intoxicating effect, do you flatter yourself that that state will last long enough not to allow her time for reflection and so prevent her confessing it? Remember how long it takes to write a letter, and the time it takes before you send it. And tell me whether a woman, especially a principled woman like your devotee, can sustain for all that time a desire she is struggling never to entertain? This procedure may work with the young, who, when they write ‘I love you’, do not realize they are saying ‘I am yours’. But Madame de Tourvel, who is so conscious of her virtue, seems to me to know perfectly well what value attaches to these expressions. So, in spite of the advantage that you gained in conversation with her, she defeats you in her letter.

— Pierre Choderlos De Laclos, Dangerous Liaisons, transl by Helen Constantine, (2007)

[msfbgraves]

Thoughts on a Silverusso Regency AU? I'm sorry I just want to see them waltzing in a crowded ballroom in front of jealous hoes 🥺

I've already said that TKK3 is essentially Les Liaisons Dangereuses set in The Valley with Terry as Valmont Kreese as the marquise de Merteuil and Daniel as madame de Tourvel, so you could do that only with Daniel as a single victim. Not regency, though, little earlier and I'm guessing you want omega Daniel? Or indeed not - Daniel, young and happily married to a sweet girl, or at least hoping to propose, getting introduced by Terry to the pleasures of, not gay sex (he's done that) but crossdressing (far more risqué!). Who is this belle on Silver's arm who he refuses to introduce yet flagrantly stands up with all night? The man has no shame!

If you need a Regency abo, Daniel is an impoverished omega after the loss of the estate through the death of his father. Indeed, his young cousin Louie is the heir and although Louie sr. graciously allows him and his mother to live at the estate until Daniel is married, that has more to do with all the money settled on them both having been tied up in the estate. Mr. LaRusso had hoped to save up the cash in the next ten years for a dowry, but he died unexpectedly, and the heir that would have secured Daniel and Lucille's place at home also didn't materialize. It's all very unfortunate since Uncle Louie sr also failed to make arrangements due to simply spending all the income and fuck Daniel's money, amirite, they're lucky to have a roof over their heads. Daniel wouldn't want his home sold now to have such a paltry sum? He'll get it when he gets it (never). So Daniel is sent far away to get married because he won't have his youth forever so chop chop get yourself wed and you and Lucille out of his hair and the county so people will forget he's still owed money.

And Daniel draws the eye of John Lawrence, ward of John Kreese, who are both poorer than they pretend to be. Johnny needs a good match but boy is smitten so Mr. Terry Silver, son of an Irish Earl's daughter who married a Jewish man for money, sans title but now with more money than God and a reputation black as sin is like, on it. I'll convince him to elope, John, send him back utterly ruined and your Johnny won't be able to marry him at all. And he gets very close. Except Johnny warns Daniel and Daniel is like "if I can't honourably marry, I will not marry at all", but nobody says no to Terry Silver, who by now is head over heels. But ah!, Oh no, sir, you would betray my confidence and ruin me and my poor mother! He cannot give in! And Terry is like "I want to marry you by special license in Westminster Abbey do not make me kidnap you!" And Daniel is like "I could not give my heart to a dishonest man!" And Terry is "Pray ask me anything and it's yours!"

"Simple peace, Sir..."

Cue the most insane and extended courtship the country has ever seen.

[straightplayshowdown]

Intimate Apparel: In 1905 New York, Esther is a lonely, single African-American woman who makes her living sewing beautiful corsets and ladies’ undergarments. There is warm affection between her and the Orthodox Jewish man who sells fabrics to her, but any relationship between them is completely forbidden. Seeking love and romance, Esther eventually embarks on a letter-writing relationship with a mysterious suitor laboring on the Panama Canal. When he moves to New York they embark on an unhappy marriage, leading Esther to realize that only her self-reliance and certainty of her own worth will see her through life’s challenges.

Les liaisons dangereuses: The plot focuses on the Marquise de Merteuil and the Vicomte de Valmont, rivals who use sex as a weapon of humiliation and degradation, all the while enjoying their cruel games. Their targets are the virtuous (and married) Madame de Tourvel and Cécile de Volanges, a young girl who has fallen in love with her music tutor, the Chevalier Danceny. In order to gain their trust, Merteuil and Valmont pretend to help the secret lovers so they can use them later in their own treacherous schemes.

Propaganda under the cut!

Intimate Apparel:

No propaganda submitted

Les liaisons dangereuses:

It was the play the Oscar nominated movie "Dangerous Liaisons" was based on

[laufire]

[Vicomte de Valmont, October 3rd]: My friend, I am tricked, betrayed, lost, I am in despair; Madame de Tourvel has gone. She has gone, and I did not know it! And I was not there to oppose departure, to reproach her with her unworthy treachery! Ah, do not think I would have let her leave; she would have stayed; yes, she would have stayed, if I had had to employ violence! [...] What pleasure I shall take in avenging myself! I shall find her again, this perfidious woman; I shall resume my empire over her. If love sufficed to procure me the means of that, what will it not do when assisted by vengeance? I shall see her again at my knees, trembling and bathed in tears, crying for mercy with her deceitful voice; and I – I shall be pitiless. - [The Marquise de Merteuil, November 24th]: You appear to make a great merit of your last scene with the Présidente; but, pray, what does it prove for your system, or against mine? I certainly never said that you loved this woman well enough not to deceive her, or not to seize every occasion which might seem to you easy or agreeable: I never even doubted but that it would be very much the same to you to satisfy with another, with the first comer, the same desires which she alone could have raised; and I am not surprised that, in the licentiousness of mind which one would be wrong to deny you, you have done once from deliberation what you have done a thousand times from opportunity.

Dangerous Liaisons, by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos.

[lady-arryn]

DANGEROUS LIAISONS costumes appreciation: 10/∞ (costume design by James Acheson)

[perioddramapolls]

Period dramas dresses tournament: White dresses Round 2- Group C: Amalia de los Robles, Bugambilia vs Marie de Tourvel, Dangerous liaisons (gifset)

[meerawrites]

Character intro: Madame de Tourvel

Inspired by: Tourvel in the source material. Michelle Pfeiffer’s Madame de Tourvel.

Character summary: she/her, white-French, discreet bisexual. Valmont’s “object of desire.”

Fun Fact: she is married, but her husband is neglectful but she is the very time period typical image of “virtue,” I feel really bad for her. But also, her and Valmont are disturbing yet fascinating.

As genre commentary: she has far more adjacency in my novella than in the source material, but it’s always nice to know that married women, even if neglected by their spouse, could be pillars of virtue, even in the 18th century.

[cate-eblanchett]

If you could live with a fictional character, who would you choose as your roommate? 🍓

Madame de Tourvel played by Michelle Pfieffer, of course.

[dang3r0usliais0ns-unit3]

When we moved on to unit 3, the first thing we had to do was watch the movie and do as much research about the era, the movie and also around cannon hall farm.

My movie was Dangerous Liaisons and it based around 18th century and was directed by Stephen Frears. The movie was based on a book which was written in 1782 by Pierre Choderlos de Laclos. The book as well as the movie focus on the dreadful and manipulative relationship between both characters Marquise de Merteuil and Vinvont de Valmont and shows how both don’t care for each other and like to play mind games on one another showing the manipulative behaviour of each character. The movie was released in 1988 which is 206 years after the book. The movie includes people like Glenn Close and Uma Therman.

The movie Dangerous Liaisons is about a man who’s called Valmont who gets challenged by Mertueil to try sleep with a young woman in the home who’s called cecil, However, Valmont sees this as too easy and challenges himself to sleep with madame de tourvel who’s also a young woman helping his aunt at his family home. He tries to seduce her but doesn’t have to easiest time.

When i was doing research about both of these things i did also do harvard referencing.

Harvard referencing->

- Pierre Choderlos de Laclos. (1782). Dangerous Liaisons. France: Penguin Classics. p.

- Kyoto Costume Institute. (2002.09.27). Fashion History by Kyoto Costume Institute. japan: Taschen GmbH. p.768.

- Ledgard Jepson. (2021). Historic House and Parklands. [Online]. cannon hall. Available at: https://www.cannon-hall.com/ [Accessed 9 February 2024].