#lotta feelings about being queer and religious
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
lesbianjudasiscariot · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
I Have a Secret Self
Hot & Heavy - Lucy Dacus / Darkness on the Edge of Town - Bruce Springsteen / Runaway - Aurora / The Dream Thieves - Maggie Stiefvater
273 notes · View notes
celestial-scrapyard · 2 years ago
Text
“I thought he was a [cis]girl because he looks like a gi” no nuh uh. Nope. You should reevaluate your binary perception of gender, aight. I don’t care how young you are, start thinkin about it now ok. Men don’t have to be masculine, women don’t have to be feminine, non-binary people don’t have to be androgynous.
2 notes · View notes
larsissobadd · 26 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Hi hi💕💫
18+ only (Ageless blogs will be blocked)
You can call me Lars/Star
Ftm, he/they, sub, 19yrs old, plus size & queer
I like being owned and controlled 🩵
If u misgender me or cross my boundaries I’ll block you no warning
Asks are open so if you’re confused on anything feel free to ask anything✌️or send threats :3
I always read message but its no guarantee I’ll reply. Don’t bother asking for pics if ur gunna be disappointed with the answer 🙄
& read the kink/hard limits first it might answer ur question or make u rethink asking lol
I like messaging when drunk but please note that I get sloppy with spelling and writing so if I make no sense or repeat myself I’m sorry (give me a punishment to make up for it)
Experimenting
This is a horny spam account i post a lotta stuff all at once oops ✌️🤭 u can tell me what to post too
Cis people are welcome to this blog but I am mainly attracted to trans people and mainly post about trans people💕
kinks below ⬇️
Please please:
Praise kink💗💗
Public humiliation 💗💗💗
Voice kink💗
Gags💗💗💗
Cnc💗💗💗
Breeding💗💗
Fantasy roleplay💗💗
Religious corruption💗💗
Stalking💗
Knife play💗💗
Nipple play💗💗💗
Intox💗💗
Bondage💗💗💗
Kidnapping💗💗
Pet play💗💗💗
Overstim💗
Orgasm denial/control💗💗💗
Height difference (I’m tall)💗
Hards NO! (dni):
Age play💀💀💀
Zoophilia💀💀💀
Pedo shit💀💀💀
Daddy kink💀💀
Highschool student x teacher💀💀
middle-school student x teacher💀💀
Preschool student x teacher💀💀💀
50+ yr olds💀💀
Detrans or misgender kink💀💀💀
Self harm (cutting, burning) kink💀💀💀
ED (starving, over eating) kink💀💀💀
Fat kink💀💀
Feeding kink💀💀
Piss/scat/throw up kink💀💀💀
Sissy💀
Disability kink💀💀
Race play💀💀💀
Terf/terf breaker💀💀
Incest/faucest💀💀💀
3 notes · View notes
tau1tvec · 2 years ago
Note
do you like living in the pacific northwest? It looks so beautiful and dreamy in that area, but idk if there are also any downsides?
I've moved around a lot growing up, and lived in a lotta places, and I've just accepted there's a downside to every place so long as humans are around, lmao.
So unless you've got the money and the means to live out in the woods, and fend for yourself, there will always be some nonsense you gotta contend with, bc everyone's got their opinion or whatever, but I definitely like it a lot more than where I used to live ( in a mostly religious town about 40 mins outta Houston, TX ), especially with everything that's going on in that state right now, being a biracial queer, raising a multi-racial queer child, I certainly feel like she's flourishing a lot more in a place that I also benefitted from at her age, in a town that makes her feel welcome, and puts her education first.
Plus the scenery is just stunning in my opinion, there's all kinds of amazing places to hike, kayak and admire its splendor, and as a writer and photographer that loves architecture and the outdoors, I couldn't ask for more.
16 notes · View notes
thewitchfarhan · 1 year ago
Note
Hey! So this is coming from a place of genuine friendliness. I saw your post about not needing to respect others beliefs and that believing in x religion means you need to follow every rule and belief they have to a T.
This post was followed by another that advocated against policing other’s spiritual boundaries - I hope you can see the irony.
From what I understand, Abrahamic religions have not been nice you, presumably because you’re queer. I get that, trust me I do. I watched my mother become more and more Pentecostal and accept me less and less as she did so. There is no denying Abrahamic religions cause harm to queer people.
But there’s no denying my gay catholic friend either. Or my Muslim queer mentor. Or my Jewish trans masc hiking buddy. All of these people have fought with themselves to find the balance between their spiritual and queer identities.
When you cast blanket statements and put people into boxes (“I’m not going to give any respect to those who align themselves with modern religions or religious traditions that have discrimination imbedded into their doctrine. “) you are borrowing rhetoric from the same people that hurt me and you. People exist in a whole lotta gray area and tossing out anyone who’s a follower of Abrahamic religions discounts way more queer and disabled and POC and just genuinely good people than you might think.
You do not get to dictate someone else’s faith because you were hurt. We as a community (queer) need to allow each other to explore and practice faith in whatever way works for the individual. We’ve all been hurt enough - let us heal through the divine however we see fit.
Hi Anon, thank you for your ask. I can respect that this is your point of view, but it is not mine and I disagree with you strongly.
You don’t have to follow a every religion to a T to be a part of that religion, I can agree with that. However, as I said before, words have meaning and words have power.
I cannot speak on Judaism or Islam because those are not faiths I have any direct experience with, and I would never presume to speak on those faiths (hence why I didn’t include them in my post. I also never used the term Abrahamic in my original post, and this is because I have a great respect for Judaism - and also have been told/heard from many Jewish people that they do not like being grouped in with Christians and do not like the term.)
However, I was raised Catholic - and I was devoutly Catholic for many years. So when I speak about the Catholic Church it comes from a *very* informed place.
To call yourself a Catholic means something VERY specific. It is not a vague label, it is not up for interpretation, it is not up for redefinition.
Calling yourself a Christian? That can be vague and can be interpreted in an unlimited number of ways. But to call yourself a Catholic is to say that you are part of the Catholic Church - and if anyone is even peripherally familiar with The Catechism then they know how strict those beliefs are. By definition if you don’t agree with the catechism then you are not actively Catholic.
That isn’t my opinion, that is quite literally a foundational belief in Catholicism. I didn’t make that rule, they did.
I will not apologize or change my mind in stating that I’m not going to respect religions that have discrimination imbedded in their doctrine - and I don’t respect anyone who aligns themselves with such faiths. Why on earth would you want to align yourself with discrimination? What makes that any different then people aligning themselves with the Republican Party in the United States?
I’m not telling anyone *what* to believe, but I am saying how I feel about it and what my thoughts are.
Once again, I respect people’s right to believe what they want - but that doesn’t mean I respect the belief.
1 note · View note
iwanttowriteitall · 6 years ago
Text
So this whole thing about Ruby Rose being cast as Batwoman has got me thinking. In an unexpected way it's connected to a thought process I've been holding onto about Tan France from queer eye for a while now.
A lot of people are upset because they didn't cast a jewish lesbian to play a jewish lesbian. Very valid. I agree. And ever since I listened to Tan's podcast on Getting Curious where he talks about what it was like growing up in a strict Muslim home and the struggle to find himself inside that world, I've been thinking. He uses his new platform through queer eye to talk about what that was like for him. Whenever he talks about it I always feel a connection there regarding finding yourself in a deeply religious community.
So I said to myself, imagine if we had someone like that who could represent the jewish community. Someone who earned the love of the public and then used that platform to talk about that life inside the religious community.
Imagine if we had a real life jewish lesbian who could talk about her jewish identity. Think of all the youth she could reach out to. Imagine seeing your underrepresented self on a screen. Or even the adults. The one who left so they could stop hiding, or the ones who still struggle every day to live inside the religious community, hiding a part of themselves and hurting.
This show that they're making, this show about a jewish lesbian is the perfect opportunity to let some jewish queerness rise to the top. I don't know if the woman they should've cast instead of Ruby would be the one to share her story in the way I imagine, but I know that they should have taken this opportunity to create a platform that could potentially be life-changing for a whole lotta queer jews.
2K notes · View notes
gettin-bi-bi-bi · 7 years ago
Note
Hey, I'm just very tired of being non-cis and non-straight and I've been thinking about trying to 'cure' myself (even tho I know that, being me is not a choice.) I've heard stories about people in the older generation suppressing themselves and living their lives as straight people with families like, (nuclear family™esque) but, like without being my true self in secret like, just straight™ 24/7, any advice because I feel like that's my only option (I'm also going to force myself to be sexual)
Nope! Do not do that! Conversion therapy and any sort of “cure” for queerness do not work and actually literally kill people or at the very least make your mental health situation a whole lotta worse.
The stories you heard about people who “successfully suppressed” their queerness are false and have likely been made up by queerphobes - and yes, that includes queer people with a whole shit of internalised queerphobias. Someone who says “I was gay but now I’ve been cured” has either never actually been gay in the first place but is just a big old homophobe making this up or they are gay but have been brainwashed by conservative, religious, homophobic people. If it’s the latter I feel very sorry for them but also angry because evil people use them as “good examples” of how conversion therapy apparently #works. It doesn‘t. It’s brainwashing and torture. I can’t stress this enough. It does not work. It harms people.
If you struggle with accepting your sexuality and/or gender then you can try to work on your internalised queerphobia yourself (I have a post about internalised biphobia that can be used for other forms of queerphobia as well) or find a counsellor or theapist that has experience with queer patients and is explicitly queer-affirming! Again: conversion therapy is bad, won’t help you and will likely make things much worse. Queerness is not an illnessthat has to be cured.
Maddie
7 notes · View notes
kennethmullins · 7 years ago
Text
Randazza: Masterpiece Cakeshop – A Whole Lotta Nothing
By Marc J. Randazza
Masterpiece Cakeshop was supposed to be one of the decisive battles in the war for "religious freedom," or "gay rights" or "free speech," or whatever you wanted it to be. And, yesterday, the Supreme Court issued its opinion. The syllabus to the case might as well have said "we really hope y'all didn't shave your balls for this, because it ain't gonna be that kind of date."
By now, everyone knows the case, right? Two guys go to a bakery and ask him to make a cake for their big fat gay wedding. Bakery owner says "I'm not doing that, because I am a Christian, and my Christian beliefs require me to be a douche to queers." I paraphrase, but that's essentially what it was.
But, operatively, he did say that they could have anything else they wanted, so he would serve gays, just not a gay wedding cake – because again, his interpretation of Christianity didn't jibe with two guys either being really happy together or making the same stupid decision that straight people have made for generations.
The baker claimed that "using his artistic skills to make an expressive statement, a wedding endorsement in his own voice and of his own creation, has a significant First Amendment speech component and implicates his deep and sincere religious beliefs." But, when he was brought up on charges before the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the members of the commission "showed elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs motivating his objection."
The outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts, all in the context of recognizing that these disputes must be re- solved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an open market.
Ultimately, in this case, nobody really "won." The baker "wins" because technically he "won." But, all he "won" was the right to have the charges brought against him without the administrative panel making snarky comments about his religious beliefs.
The cause of gay rights was not advanced at all. And, the real issue here — the First Amendment issue, is not being addressed at all — except in a pretty damn good concurrence by Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Gorsuch. (Starts on Page 38 of 59) His concurrence is, of course, foreshadowing either the majority or the minority when this case finally comes to a head. Thomas (I believe correctly) says that designing a wedding cake is no mere act of throwing eggs and flour into a bowl – but is full of artistic creativity. Harnessing (or enslaving) an artist to create that which he does not wish to create is a travesty against the First Amendment.
In any event, this is a pretty short post on a pretty long opinion – because that's all this opinion needs. Those celebrating a "victory" and those bemoaning a "defeat" are both wrong. This case is a punt of epic proportions, leaving nothing resolved. So, if you're a Gay Rights fan, to the extent you would sacrifice the First Amendment at the altar of "equality," then you should not feel defeated. If you're a First Amendment advocate, you really shouldn't feel too smug – except in knowing that you have a guaranteed two votes when this comes up again. However, you should also understand that you definitely don't have Ginsburg or Sotomayor on your side either (they wrote the dissent).
So, once this case finally gets back to the Supreme Court, it is a 2-2 tie at the outset.
Copyright 2017 by the named Popehat author.
0 notes