#law firm offices | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

edictumlaw · 16 days ago

Text

Expert Commercial Litigation Attorneys at Edictum Law and Co in Delhi

n the fast-paced business environment of Delhi, disputes can emerge as significant hurdles to growth and stability. Edictum Law and Co, with its team of expert commercial litigation attorneys, is dedicated to helping businesses navigate these challenges effectively. Our law firm specializes in resolving complex legal disputes, ensuring that your business can focus on what it does best.

The Role of a Commercial Litigation Attorney

Commercial litigation encompasses a broad spectrum of legal services aimed at resolving business disputes. Our attorneys are skilled in handling cases that include, but are not limited to:

Contract Disputes: We ensure all parties involved adhere to contractual obligations and pursue remedies when breaches occur.

Partnership Disagreements: Our team helps resolve internal conflicts within partnerships and corporations, aiming to preserve the business's integrity and continuity.

Intellectual Property Disputes: We protect your innovative products, services, and brands from infringement, ensuring your intellectual assets are secure.

Why Choose Edictum Law and Co?

Selecting the right commercial litigation attorney can make a significant difference in the outcome of your legal disputes. Here are several reasons why Edictum Law and Co stands out:

Depth of Experience: Our lawyers bring a wealth of knowledge and experience, having successfully represented numerous businesses across various industries in Delhi.

Client-Centric Approach: We tailor our legal strategies to suit the specific needs and objectives of each client, ensuring personalized and effective representation.

Commitment to Results: We focus on achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients, whether through negotiation, arbitration, or court trials.

Comprehensive Commercial Litigation Services

At Edictum Law and Co, we offer a comprehensive range of litigation services designed to protect and advance your business interests:

Pre-litigation Advice: We provide strategic guidance to help prevent disputes before they escalate.

Litigation and Trial Representation: When litigation is unavoidable, our attorneys are formidable advocates in court, equipped to handle complex trials.

Alternative Dispute Resolution: We also support mediation and arbitration as effective means to resolve disputes without the need for extensive litigation.

Connect with Us

If you're facing a business dispute or need expert legal advice on commercial litigation matters, contact Edictum Law and Co. Visit our website at Edictum Law and Co to learn more about our services or to schedule a consultation. Our team is ready to assist you with comprehensive legal support, tailored to your unique business needs.

#commercial litigation attorney #law firm in delhi #editum law and co #law firm in india #law firm offices #edictum law and co #edictum #law #real estate law #real estate lawyer #real estate and property law #commercial litigators

0 notes

yuwuta · 5 months ago

Note

gojo would kill your work husband. but if he were the work husband, that's a different story

REAL!! he’s such a hypocrite because if someone mentioned you had a work husband, his entire world would stop and he wold devise the absolute worst plans to make sure that your co-worker, everyone at your job, and everyone in the next building over knew that he was happily committed to you

but if he is the work husband, he’s very........ dutiful in his role. there’s a loose office/lawyer au in my head where satoru is your secretary, and for all intents and purposes, your personal assistant, and he’s good at his job, but mostly because he considers his job to be pleasing you. he has coffee for you when you arrive, he moves your schedule around without you asking, he has answers to questions before you can even ask them, he has fresh flowers on your desk weekly, pokes into your meetings to pretend to hand you a file that’s really just maybe a single document in a manilla folder with candy on top of it—he’s made himself your business, your partner; he’s made himself irreplaceable, and he loves to remind everybody of that fact.

he’s also extremely loyal. sure, he could day a week’s worth of work done in about a day, but that doesn’t mean he’ll just use his talents for anybody. he’s your secretary, so he’s at your beck and call, and everyone knows it. they know he’s the best, but also that he’s off limits—not because you won’t share him, but because satoru won’t let himself be shared.

he also extends his duties beyond work, of course. when he hands you a print out of your schedule for the day and you’re confused by the three-hour block of time you have in the middle of the day, satoru just helps you shrug your coat of your shoulders and smiles, “that’s for the lunch date you have with me, of course!” hanging up your coat in your closet for you, “i’m paying, see you soon, sweets.” and because you’re great at your job, and satoru helps you be great, nobody really questions when the two of you have time for a 13-course tasting menu at 1pm on a tuesday afternoon. and if they did, all satoru would say that you two had a lovely date

#anonymous #he's like donna from suits but worse because he's like if harvey were donna LOL #i have soooooo much to say about him #he doesn't really Have to work he's a nepotism baby supreme #but he met you maybe in undergrad? and he's been obsessed w you since #he knows youre a workaholic so he's dutifully sat by your side all these years through college through grad/professional school #and when you told him you got to hire your own assistant he was the very first applicant #because getting paid to spend his days with you and take care of you? he was already doing that for free might as well make it official #everyone in the office knows satoru loves you except you honestly #he probably has his own masters/JD but elects to be your assistant anyway bc that's so much more fun #what he Really wants to be a househusband but first he's gotta ask you out and propose and all that good stuff (cue him rolling his eyes #and going on about formalities and boring systems and blah blah blah)#also in the office au in my head: nanami (also senior partner) higuruma ofc <3 beloved (managing partner) and TOJI!#WALK WITH ME!#its honestly probably satoru's influence that gets toji into law... as someone who so feverently broke it in the past #idk maybe there's a megumi situation that makes gojo be like yk if ur this good at skirting/breaking the law youd probably be half decent #at enforcing it... or at least helping other people get around it too #and so lawyer toji is born #does he screw around w the rich people who r stupid w their money? absolutely #but you nanami and higuruma just let it be bc he brings in those settlements better than anybody else....#hmmm... i kinda wanna make megumi somebody's associate but also..... yuuta.....#i think i just like sticking yuuta in a tie if im being real #but anyway... satoru is your Work Husband and everyone knows he wants to be your real husband #but they just let it slide bc rumour has it even tho hes just a secretary hes got equity in the firm?? and besides that his heart eyes give #away his hopeless devotion from a mile away #the day you actually start seeing somebody outside of work... oh theyre in for Trouble #satoru x reader #him dragging you out of ur office late at night and u protesting so he just. puts u over his shoulder #and ur telling him to let u down but he's insisting u go home and then nanami pops out of his office #and ur like wait nanami this isnt what it looks like but he's so dead in the eyes when he just sighs

259 notes · View notes

coochiequeens · 1 year ago

Text

Woman’ is not an ambiguous term open to an evolving interpretation.” - the attorneys representing the women who want to keep the sorority house they pay $8,000 for male free.

By Genevieve Gluck December 14, 2023

The female complainants at the center of a lawsuit to have a trans-identified male removed from a sorority at the University of Wyoming have re-filed their appeal, demanding the court clearly define the word “woman.” Artemis Langford, previously known as Dallin, was accepted into Kappa Kappa Gamma (KKG) last September, spurring several women to file a lawsuit to have him removed.

In August, the case of Westenbroek v. Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity was dismissed on the basis that re-defining “woman” to include males was “Kappa Kappa Gamma’s bedrock right.” Despite hearing testimony from the women, some of whom stated Langford had “watched” them undress with an erection, Judge Alan Johnson rejected the women’s request to rescind Langford’s admission into the sorority.

However, on December 4, the young women filed an appeal to have the dismissal reversed, arguing that Langford’s presence in the sorority house “caused emotional distress in a personalized and unique way,” and demanding that the court clearly define the word “woman.”

In the appeal, the women reassert that Langford displayed “strange and sexual behavior” towards them, and caused them a level of discomfort and anxiety amounting to personal injury. It reiterates claims that Langford had been filming and photographing the women without their consent and had displayed a visible erection while in the house.

“Specifically, Langford’s unwanted staring, photographing, and videotaping of the Plaintiffs, as well as his asking questions about sex and displaying a visible erection while in the house, invaded Plaintiffs’ privacy and caused emotional distress in a personalized and unique way. And thus Plaintiffs have pleaded a viable direct claim. This Court should therefore reverse the district court’s dismissal of Plaintiffs’ derivative and direct claims,” the appeal reads.

Some of the allegations are a reiteration of previous claims, which Langford’s attorney, Rachel Berkness, has attempted to portray as both false and discriminatory during court proceedings. In June, Berkness filed a motion to dismiss the sorority women’s claims against Langford as “frivolous and malicious,” stating: “The allegations against Ms. Langford … were borne out of a hypothesis in search of evidence and pieced together using drunken party stories. Ms. Langford is not a victim; she is a target.”

The initial suit, filed at the end of March, had asserted that Langford, who is 6’2″, had been voyeuristically peeping on the women while they were in intimate situations, and, on at least one occasion, had a visible erection while doing so.

“One sorority member walked down the hall to take a shower, wearing only a towel … She felt an unsettling presence, turned, and saw [Langford] watching her silently,” the court document reads.

“[Langford] has, while watching members enter the sorority house, had an erection visible through his leggings,” the suit says. “Other times, he has had a pillow in his lap.”

As evidenced by his Tinder profile, Langford is “sexually interested in women.” It was further stated in that Langford took photographs of the women while at a sorority slumber party, where he also is said to have made inappropriate comments.

“At a slumber party, Langford ‘repeatedly questioned the women about what vaginas look like, [and] breast cup size,’ and stared as one Plaintiff changed her clothes,” reads the appeal. “Langford also talked about his virginity and discussed at what age it would be appropriate for someone to have sex… And he stated that he would not leave one of the sorority’s sleepovers until after everyone fell asleep.”

Langford was also said to have taken pictures of female members “without their knowledge or consent.” Some of the women noted that they had “observed Langford writing detailed notes about [the students] and their statements and behavior.”

In May, a judge twice prohibited the women from suing anonymously, while stipulating that Langford’s identity should remain protected. Langford was referred to by the pseudonym “Terry Smith” and male pronouns in the legal documents. Six of the women then refiled the lawsuit under their own names, and are requesting that the court void Langford’s membership in KKG.

“It is really uncomfortable. Some of the girls have been sexually assaulted or sexually harassed. Some girls live in constant fear in our home,” one of the sisters, Hannah, told Megyn Kelly during an interview on her podcast.

Rather than addressing the privacy and safety concerns of the women in KKG, who had each paid $8,000 to live in the sorority house, “Kappa officials recommended that … they should quit Kappa Kappa Gamma entirely.”

In June, the sorority filed a motion to dismiss the suit, calling it a “frivolous” attempt to eject Langford for “their own political purposes.” According to the motion, the women suing were flinging “dehumanizing mud” in order to “bully Ms. Langford on the national stage.” The sorority invited the women to resign their membership “if a position of inclusion is too offensive for their personal values.”

In the motion, lawyers for Kappa Kappa Gamma attempted to depict the suit as an attempt by “a vocal minority” to impose their views on Langford and the rest of the sorority members.

“Perhaps the greatest wrongs in this case are not the ones Plaintiffs and their supporters imagine they have suffered, but the ones that they have inflicted through their conduct since filing the Complaint,” they wrote. “Regardless of personal views on the rights of transgender people, the cruelty that Plaintiffs and their supporters have shown towards Langford and anyone in Kappa who supports Langford is disturbing.”

The recent appeal against the suit’s dismissal, filed on behalf of the young women by Sylvia May Mailman of the Independent Women’s Law Center, the Law Office of John G. Knepper, Schaerr Jaffe LLP, and Cassie Craven of Longhorn Law firm, details several alleged violations of the sorority sisters’ rights, as well as KKG’s own policies.

“The question at the heart of this case is the definition of ‘woman,’ a term that Kappa has used since 1870 to prescribe membership, in Kappa’s governing documents,” the appeal states. “Using any conceivable tool of contractual interpretation, the term refers to biological females. And yet, the district court avoided this inevitable conclusion by applying the wrong law and ignoring the factual assertions in the complaint.”

It goes on to note that from 1870 to 2018, KKG defined “woman” to exclude “transgender women” and that any new definition may not be enacted without a KKG bylaw amendment.

Numerous examples are given of rules put forward by the sorority which use the term “woman,” with the attorneys maintaining that “‘woman’ is not an ambiguous term open to an evolving interpretation.”

KKG leaders who approved Langford’s membership have “subverted Kappa’s mission and governing documents by changing the definition of ‘woman’ without following the required processes.” Kappa President Mary Pat Rooney’s legal team has argued that Langford’s admission into the sorority was based on a 2015 position statement which asserts that KKG “is a single-gender organization comprised of women and individuals who identify as women.”

However, the women’s legal appeal points out that KKG can only change its membership criteria by amending its Bylaws, a process which requires a two-thirds majority approval vote by a Convention of board members. As a Convention to amend Bylaws to reflect the position statement was never held, the appeal states, Langford’s acceptance into KKG is a violation of accepted policies.

KKG leadership is also accused of using “coercive” tactics during the process of voting Langford into the organization in September 2022. After an initial anonymous vote conducted via Google poll failed to result in Langford’s acceptance into the sorority, Chapter leaders developed a second, non-anonymous voting system in which multiple sisters changed their votes because of “fear of reprisal.”

In addition to denying women anonymity, Wyoming chapter officials, after consultation with Kappa’s leadership, had told members that voting against Langford’s admission was evidence of “bigotry” that “is a basis for suspension or expulsion from the Sorority.”

Curiously, prior court documents also reveal that Langford was admitted to KKG despite not even meeting their basic academic eligibility requirements.

While KKG requires applicants to have a 2.7 Grade Point Average (GPA), Langford only had a 1.9 at the time he submitted his membership request, and was not on a grade probation. The legal complaint notes that this indicates Langford’s application was “evaluated using a different standard.”

In November, two longstanding alumni members of KKG revealed they had been expelled in an apparent retaliation for advocating that membership be restricted to females only. Patsy Levang and Cheryl Tuck-Smith had been members of the sorority for over 50 years, and had contributed to fundraising efforts for the organization.

Despite their long history of supporting KKG, Levang and Tuck-Smith were voted out by the sorority’s national leadership on November 9. Levang had been the past Kappa Kappa Gamma National Foundation President, while Tuck-Smith was an active contributor and organizer.

The women’s removal came after they had been vocally opposed to the admission of Langford to the KKG chapter at the University of Wyoming, and had supported a lawsuit launched by members of that sorority to have him removed.

Since news of the lawsuit first became widely circulated, Langford has received ample sympathetic coverage in mainstream media, with one MSNBC host labeling him “brave and unique.” In a recent profile by the Washington Post, Langford was given a platform to accuse the sorority sisters involved in the suit of lying while being compared to women who had historically been denied the right to a basic education.

#usa #university of wyoming #What is a woman?#Artemis Langford is Dallin #What is with TIMs choosing the names of goddesses?#Kappa Kappa Gamma (KKG)#The case of Westenbroek v. Kappa Kappa Gamma Fraternity #Get Judge Alan Johnson of the bench #Transbian #The court system was offering to protect the creeps identity but not the women involved #The women each paid $8000 to live in the sororiety house #Independent Women’s Law Center #the Law Office of John G. Knepper #Schaerr Jaffe LLP #and Cassie Craven of Longhorn Law firm #from 1870 to 2018 #From 1870 to 2018 KKG defined “woman” to exclude “transgender women”#any new definition may not be enacted without a KKG bylaw amendment #woman is not an ambiguous term open to an evolving interpretation #Convention to amend Bylaws to reflect the position statement was never held #Langford’s acceptance into KKG is a violation of accepted policies.#After an initial anonymous vote conducted via Google poll failed to result in Langford’s acceptance into the sorority #Chapter leaders held a second non-anonymous voting system in which multiple sisters changed their votes because of “fear of reprisal.”#While KKG requires applicants to have a 2.7 Grade Point Average (GPA)#Langford only had a 1.9 at the time he submitted his membership request #and was not on a grade probation. The legal complaint notes that this indicates Langford’s application was “evaluated using a different sta #TIMs claim to be victims but get a lot of perks #Kappa Kappa Gamma (KKG) would rather kick out two women who were active supports of the organization for decades than admit they were wrong

115 notes · View notes

wataksampingan · 2 years ago

Text

THIS IS THE ONLY WAY WE'RE CELEBRATING APRIL FOOL'S FROM NOW ON OH MY GOD MY HEART

#my in laws are obsessed with me #my in-laws are obsessed with me #MILAOWM #OMG #I CAN'T #the modern office romcom au I never expected and now desperately want #it's an architectural firm right #tell me he's a stressed out overworked head architect #out on assignment with his new junior #and she cajoles him into a purikura machine #and he indulges her coz he caught feelings #ugh this otp #THEY'RE SO CUTE I CAN'T

261 notes · View notes

gwensy · 1 month ago

Text

& so dont think about george bringing a like 7yr old gwen around with him for work related issues don't think about her sitting in d.a nelson's office and messing with things on his desk

#theres stuff happening inside my head that i cant tell u about #gwext #+ her having glanced at murdock entering foggy's office as a kid #he's dressed like a fire hydrant. its hard to miss and law firms are boring #george and foggy already Know Each Other in the comics via occupation and they talk one on one i think its Fun. and it hurts more #eye dee kay. fond of the foggy gwen dynamic

11 notes · View notes

opossumbyknight · 2 months ago

Text

my stupid fucking job is literally making me miss retail like I'm filing depositions for attorneys and my brain is screaming I JUST WANNA STOCK SHELVES. ORGANIZE A STOCK ROOM. FUCK.

#im a simple man i dont wanna be an Office Services Manager at a Law Firm #i just wanna pick things up and put them down #also if i went back to my old workplace in a supervisor role it'd pay MORE than this ''better'' job lol. lmao even

8 notes · View notes

mournfulminds · 9 months ago

Text

𝐖𝐇𝐎: So-hee / 「 @cigvrettedvet 」

𝐖𝐇𝐄𝐍: Spring / 2024

𝐖𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄: Bus station

Planted in front of the law office was a bus station that people rarely utilised considering the public transportation was unspeakable in this town, not only because of the crime that ran rampant at night but also the certain smell that persisted on the bus following the yellow route. Theresa had seen it day in and day out, always three stops a day, usually an elderly person in tow, and always from what little safety the front desk and a sheet of glass provided.

Seeing it up close and personal for the first time made her stomach churn, a reaction caused, also in part by her car dying right after she got off her shift, leaving her stranded. It was getting darker now, and she could not call for a taxi, or ask a coworker, so instead, she went with the next best thing. This led to the internal words about whether someone she had met in the bathroom of a club and later took home was the best thing? Perhaps not, but as a car rolled down the street, Téa stood up from the bench and ducked her head out of the bus shelter as she waved for it to come to a stop. "Thank you for not having me rely on the kindness of strangers, I did not feel like ending up on Dateline tonight, though I'm hoping it would be a semi-curious episode. If you don't have plans, do you want to grab a a drink, or something to eat? On me, as a thank you? Or... I have this," Grabbing the bag from her shoulder, the older woman beamed as she pulled out a joint.

#cigvrettedvet #thread: theresa & sohee (001)#character: mao / theresa #drugs tw #téa works as an office worker @ a law firm in her civilian life & hates every hour of it

9 notes · View notes

aces-and-angels · 10 months ago

Text

park & davis- divide et impera

click for better quality

agnes/jina's picrew; enid's picrew; zahir's picrew; will's picrew

#playchoices #choices #laws of attraction #enid mendoza #meet the rest of the rival firm yall #agnes park #jina davis #zahir saidi #will thomson #gonna gush about the two i havent talked about yet #zahir (he/him)- the office disaster who somehow still has a job; knows what to do as long as no one yells at him #will (they/them)- long-time employee and office gossip; nosy as hell- ie knows who is sleeping w who/new potential clients etc etc #keeps an eye out for zahir- makes sure he doesnt totally shut down throughout the day + helps when he can #ALSO #agnes and jina- power lesbians #their relationship under lock and key from members of the firm (for now- rn im just into the idea for the drama lol)#park & davis #pls ask me stuff about them lmaoo #into the windverse

8 notes · View notes

oldmanmotif · 4 months ago

Text

I BE READING ON THE JOB BECAUSE MY FATHER HRIED ME 🔥🔥🔥🔥🇺🇸👍🤑

#Yes I work at a law firm no they did not give me a good office because I AM a MINOR #reading #coca cola #😇

4 notes · View notes

daboyau · 2 months ago

Note

What kind of work do you do for a living, and do you like it?

I process orders for a software company! There’s a lot more that goes into it, but that’s the gist. I do enjoy it, mostly because I work fully remotely so I can work in my pj’s all day lol. If I wasn’t working from home I think I probably would have quit by now, though.

It’s one of those jobs that isn’t really exciting or super fulfilling, but it gives me some money and flexible enough time to go do the things that leave me feeling more fulfilled. :) I do really miss other jobs I’ve done in the past bc they were more interesting, but none of those jobs paid the bills so I just hold them as fond memories now. ✌️

#If money wasn’t a consideration I’d probably go back to working at an aquarium #I was interviewing to join the animal husbandry team from an educator position which was a dream of mine but it only paid $12 an hour so no #I would NOT go back to working at a personal injury law firm #I WOULD go back to being staff at the group home but probably not night shift again #I’d probably work at walmart again but only as a shelf stocker. I didn’t like the deli much.#I would work at a 24 hour bakery again #I would be open to an auto parts shop again but it wouldn’t be my first choice #I would not work as a sonic carhop again #I can’t remember what other jobs i’ve done at the moment lol #But that’s the list that no one asked for #My current job ranks high bc i have a lot of freedom with it but if I was still working in the office I’d be long gone by now #Asks #anon ask #i’m excited we’re still playing the question game hehe #Thank you for the ask!!

5 notes · View notes

edictumlaw · 2 months ago

Text

Navigating Complex Financial Waters: Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law at Edictum Law and Co

Financial distress can be a challenging phase for any business or individual. At Edictum Law and Co, our team of adept bankruptcy and insolvency lawyers in Delhi specializes in guiding clients through the intricate legal landscapes governed by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI).

Understanding Bankruptcy and Insolvency

Bankruptcy and insolvency proceedings are critical tools for restructuring financial obligations when businesses or individuals cannot meet their debt obligations. Here’s how our experts at Edictum Law and Co can help:

Strategic Assessment: We evaluate your financial situation to provide tailored advice, whether it involves reorganizing your business or liquidating assets to pay creditors.

Navigating IBBI Regulations: Our attorneys have in-depth knowledge of the IBBI guidelines and work tirelessly to ensure compliance while seeking the most favorable outcomes.

Representation in Proceedings: From filing the case to representing clients in negotiations and court proceedings, our lawyers are dedicated to your side every step of the way.

Expertise in Insolvency and Bankruptcy Law

Our legal team is experienced in handling a wide array of cases under the insolvency and bankruptcy framework, including:

Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP): We assist corporations in navigating the CIRP, ensuring efficient dealings with creditors and maximizing the chances to revive the business.

Personal Bankruptcy: For individuals facing insurmountable debt, we provide compassionate and competent legal representation to explore all available options for relief.

Cross-Border Insolvency: The complexities of cross-border insolvency require sophisticated legal strategies, which our seasoned attorneys are well-equipped to handle.

Why Choose Edictum Law and Co?

Selecting the right legal partner in bankruptcy and insolvency matters is crucial. Here are a few reasons why clients choose Edictum Law and Co:

Proven Expertise: Our attorneys are well-versed in the latest developments and case laws related to bankruptcy and insolvency.

Personalized Attention: We understand the stress involved in financial distress and offer personalized services to ease our clients through the process.

Result-Oriented Strategies: Our track record of successful resolutions attests to our commitment to achieving the best possible outcomes for our clients.

Get Expert Legal Help Today

If you’re facing financial challenges or need advice on insolvency and bankruptcy matters, don’t hesitate to reach out to Edictum Law and Co. For more information or to schedule a consultation, visit our website at Edictum Law and Co or contact us directly. Let our experts help you navigate through these challenging times with confidence and legal excellence.

#bankruptcy and insolvency lawyers #bankruptcy and insolvency #bankruptcy lawyers #edictum #edictum law and co #law #law firm offices #law firm in india

0 notes

pilawturkey · 5 months ago

Text

Law Firm in Turkey

When it comes to navigating the intricate legal landscape of Turkey, having a reliable and knowledgeable law firm by your side is essential. Pi Legal Consultancy stands out as a premier law firm in Turkey, offering comprehensive legal services to both domestic and international clients. With a team of highly skilled lawyers, Pi Legal Consultancy is dedicated to providing exceptional legal counsel and representation.

About Pi Legal Consultancy

Pi Legal Consultancy is a distinguished law firm Turkey, renowned for its commitment to excellence and client satisfaction. Established with the vision of delivering top-tier legal services, our firm has built a reputation for integrity, professionalism, and expertise. Our team comprises experienced lawyers in Turkey who specialize in various fields of law, ensuring that we can meet the diverse needs of our clients.

Comprehensive Legal Services

As a leading law firm in Turkey, Pi Legal Consultancy offers a wide range of legal services tailored to the unique requirements of our clients. Whether you are an individual seeking legal advice or a corporation in need of comprehensive legal support, our lawyers are equipped to handle your case with the utmost care and professionalism.

Corporate and Commercial Law

Our expertise in corporate and commercial law is unparalleled. We assist businesses of all sizes in navigating the complexities of Turkish business law. From company formation and mergers to contract negotiations and dispute resolution, our corporate lawyers in Turkey provide strategic legal advice to help your business thrive.

Real Estate and Property Law

Pi Legal Consultancy is also recognized for its proficiency in real estate and property law. Whether you are buying, selling, or leasing property, our law firm Turkey offers expert legal guidance to ensure that your transactions are smooth and compliant with all legal requirements.

Immigration and Citizenship Law

For clients seeking to move to Turkey or obtain Turkish citizenship, our immigration lawyers offer comprehensive support throughout the process. We understand the intricacies of immigration law and work diligently to help our clients achieve their goals.

Family Law

Our family law practice covers a broad spectrum of issues, including divorce, child custody, and inheritance disputes. We approach each case with sensitivity and professionalism, striving to achieve the best possible outcomes for our clients. For this reason, we serve as divorce lawyer in Turkey with our expert staff.

Why Choose Pi Legal Consultancy?

Choosing the right law firm in Turkey is crucial to the success of your legal matters. Pi Legal Consultancy distinguishes itself through a combination of expertise, dedication, and personalized service. Here are a few reasons why we are the preferred choice for clients seeking a lawyer in Turkey:

Experienced Team: Our lawyers possess extensive experience in their respective fields, providing you with the assurance that your case is in capable hands.

Client-Centric Approach: We prioritize our clients' needs and work closely with them to develop tailored legal strategies that meet their specific objectives.

Global Perspective: As an international law firm, we understand the complexities of cross-border legal issues and offer solutions that align with global best practices.

Proven Track Record: Our firm has a history of successfully handling complex legal cases, earning us a reputation for excellence in the legal community.

If you are in need of legal assistance in Turkey, Pi Legal Consultancy is here to help. Our team of dedicated lawyers is ready to provide you with the expert legal counsel and representation you deserve. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and learn more about how we can assist you.

#turkey #law office #citizenship by investment #international trade #international law #lawyer #law firm #attorney #legal #legaladvice #legal services

3 notes · View notes

coochiequeens · 1 year ago

Text

A fully intact male walked into a shower with girls and then exposed himself. But that never happens.

The Department of Education (DOE) has opened an investigation into an incident at a Wisconsin school involving a transgender woman student in a locker room with female students.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative law firm, announced this week that it received a letter from the DOE saying that the department's Office of Civil Rights (OCR) was opening an investigation into a complaint it filed earlier this year involving a transgender student who undressed in front of female students in the Sun Prairie Area School District (SPASD). Newsweek reached out to the DOE via email for comment.

"Following the school's failure to sufficiently address the incident, disregard for parents' concerns, and their stonewalling of an open records request, WILL worked alongside parents of the school district to seek an investigation and remedies from the Department of Education under the Biden Administration," the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty [WILL] said in a press release on Thursday. "The federal government notified WILL that in response to our complaint they are opening an investigation of SPASD."

WILL Deputy Counsel Daniel Lennington told Newsweek on Thursday: "This opening of a formal civil rights investigation is tremendously significant, not only for this case, but as a warning to other schools nationwide that embrace new and untested transgender policies without considering the impact on female students."

According to the WILL, in June, it filed a complaint with the DOE after learning that an 18-year-old transgender woman student undressed in front of four female high school students in a locker room.

"As the girls began to shower, the male student approached them, entered the shower area, announced 'I'm trans, by the way,' and then fully undressed and showered next to the girls," the complaint said. "He was initially turned towards the wall but turned and fully exposed his body to the four girls. He had not transitioned medically and had the physiological appearance of an adult male. Understandably, the girls closed their eyes and tried to hurry up and leave the showers."

Conservatives have continued to slam the LGBTQ+ and transgender community this year after Bud Light partnered with transgender influencer and activist Dylan Mulvaney, with many calling for boycotts and an end to the inclusion of transgender women in female sports.

Many Democrats have shown support for the transgender community, with President Joe Biden recently calling for an end to discrimination against trans individuals and saying: "My Administration ended the ban on transgender Americans serving our country and I signed historic executive action to strengthen civil rights protections for all LGBTQI+ Americans."

In the complaint to the DOE, WILL said that the locker room incident is a violation of Title IX law involving the prohibition of discrimination based on sex.

"Under this law, sex discrimination encompasses sexual harassment, which includes unwelcome conduct so severe that it effectively denies a person equal access to the education program, like the incident that occurred at SPASD," it said.

"WILL claims in this complaint that SPASD discriminated against four freshman girls on the basis of sex. Not only did the district fail to comply with requirements under Title IX, but its policies fail to protect all female students in the district."

The law firm said it previously listened to complaints from parents following the incident, and that the female students initially informed an assistant principal, who was required to notify the Title IX coordinator but failed to do so.

"Over a month after the incident, a principal emailed our client and apologized 'for the incident that occurred' and attached a copy of a 'Restroom and Locker Room Accessibility Guidance' document [Ex. A], which by all accounts was never adopted by the school board," the complaint said. "No one at SPASD contacted the girls to offer supportive measures or an opportunity to file a formal complaint of sexual harassment until after WILL became involved."

A spokesperson for the school district confirmed to WMSN-TV in Wisconsin receipt of the letter from the DOE but didn't comment further.

The letter announcing the investigation by the DOE said the department will remain "neutral," and "will collect and analyze the evidence it needs in order to make a decision."

"We applaud the Department of Education Office of Civil Rights for investigating the allegations made in our complaint, but we all need to wait and see if they take this as seriously as they should," WILL Associate Counsel Cory Brewer said. "We hope this results in answers for parents and families at the Sun Prairie Area School District, but we won't know until we see the results of the investigation."

#usa #Wisconsin #The Department of Education (DOE)#The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty #Office of Civil Rights (OCR)#Sun Prairie Area School District (SPASD)#Keep men out of women’s spaces #Restroom and Locker Room Accessibility Guidance' document #I hate that a conservative law firm is taking up the case on behalf of those girls #But liberal law firms are too busy protecting men

16 notes · View notes

mattersuite · 7 months ago

Text

Summer Special: 25% Off CaseFox Legal Billing Software! ☀️

Unlock your law firm's potential with CaseFox legal software's summer discount! Streamline your practice, simplify billing, and manage cases effortlessly. Don't miss out on this exclusive offer - claim your discount now! #SummerSavings #LegalTech #EfficiencyBoost 💼

#Summer Savings #summer deal #summer offer #summer discount #legal software #law software #lawyers #attorneys #solicitor #legal professionals #law firm #law office #legal office #legal billing software #legal management software #law firm billing #law firm billing software

3 notes · View notes

snarp · 2 years ago

Text

I wrote this "How To Pick Out A Cheap Laptop In Early 2023" tutorial for my parents' law office; there's some task-specific stuff in there, but it may be useful for other people.

DON'T SPEND MORE THAN $500 - You can generally meet all of the guidelines below for under $400.

YOU NEED WINDOWS 10, NOT WINDOWS 11 - Avoid buying Windows 11 PCs or upgrading existing PCs to Windows 11. If a PC uses Windows 11, turn it off whenever it is not in use. As of right now (early 2023), Windows 11 is still only really intended for use in places with 100%-consistent high-speed internet access. The office's internet connection (like most places in Appalachia) can't handle this, so Windows 11 computers are likely to slow the whole network to a crawl. (There are a few things you can do to make this less of a problem, but they're not practical for the office (time-consuming, have to be re-done regularly, will stress everyone out).)

YOU NEED AN ETHERNET PORT - Since spotty wifi is a problem in a lot of places, buying a laptop with no ethernet port is a bad idea. (Also, laptops WITHOUT ethernet adapters aren't generally designed for heavy daily use - they can break easily.)

YOU NEED BOTH AN HDMI PORT AND AN SVGA PORT - The vast majority of TVs/projectors use either HDMI or SVGA ports; some recent laptops are missing one or both. This makes it very hard to, for example, give PowerPoint presentations in old courthouses.

YOU NEED A (SMALL) SSD DRIVE - Computers with SSDs (solid-state drives) can turn on and open files MUCH faster than those with HDDs (hard disc drives). SSDs have less storage space than HDDs, but that doesn't matter for the office's purposes - 256 GB is more than enough.

YOU NEED AT LEAST 8GB OF RAM - Preferably 16GB.

YOU DON'T WANT A "BUILT-IN BATTERY" - This just means "battery that can't be replaced." Laptops like this are designed to be disposable, so they always have a lot of other problems.

YOU NEED AT LEAST TWO USB-3 PORTS - Some recent laptops only have USB-C ports (the tiny ones), not the normal, rectangular ones (USB-3 and -2). USB-C-only laptops are intended as fashion accessories - they're not meant to be used for daily work, and (as above) always have a lot of other problems.

YOU WANT AN INTEL CORE i5-EQUIVALENT-OR-BETTER PROCESSOR - This isn't as big a deal as the RAM or SSD, but i3 processors slow down a lot of stuff.

YOU PROBABLY NEED A CD DRIVE - Many recent laptops don't have CD drives, but there are going to be times when you need them. (If necessary, you can buy a USB CD drive.)

BLUETOOTH ISN'T ACTUALLY VERY IMPORTANT - You can get a USB plugin if you need it, but you probably won't.

YOU DO NOT WANT A MACBOOK OR ANY OTHER APPLE PRODUCT - For too many reasons to list.

YOU DO NOT WANT A CHROMEBOOK - Even worse than MacBooks.

LINUX LAPTOPS ARE USUALLY FINE BUT YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO USE THEM - You'll end up needing to install Windows 10.

#(note: part of the problem with windows 11 is that it's not compatible with a lot of the stuff we use at the office #it is potentially not as big a problem if you are not a low-budget law firm with a creaky lan)#(same with linux obviously #if you want to learn to use linux and are not my parents then i encourage you to do so - it in many ways is in fact easier than windows/ios #i just don't personally want to handle linux tech support for weird ancient legal tech)#(but DON'T get an apple device or chromebook)#(just don't fucking do it)

13 notes · View notes