#kirsty wark

[thequietabsolute]

Sob & sniff 😢🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[nonesuchrecords]

Jeremy Denk was on BBC Radio 4's Front Row to talk with presenter Kirsty Wark about Charles Ives, ahead of Denk's celebration of the composer's 150th birthday in concert at the Lammermuir Festival in Scotland this weekend and on his upcoming album Ives Denk, due October 18 on Nonesuch. You can hear their conversation here at 17:30 minutes in.

[homocausticus]

Obrigado Kirsty

Na última sexta-feira. A âncora Kirsty Wark apresentou o Newsnight, da BBC Two, pela última vez. Agora, ela se dedicará ao Front Row, o programa de cultura da BBC Radio Four. Ela é um dos últimos integrantes da segunda fase do Newsnight que tinha Jeremy Paxman com suas perguntas certeiras no fim dos anos 1980. Nos anos 1990, a BBC tinha o Newsnight como um programa de jornalismo noturno com senso…

[humbledragon669]

S1E4 – Saturday Morning Funtime Write Up P1 - Saturday (The last day of the World) up to The Fields of Megiddo

Please forgive the slight skipping ahead to get the banner for the time period, I’m a sucker for consistency and I like to start this write ups with a pretty picture so all the text doesn’t look so daunting. There’s a lot of narrative to get through in this episode, which is borne out in quick scene changes, so apologies if this write up comes across as a bit scattered. Housekeeping aside, I have something intriguing to point out in the opening scene. Captain Vincent (who in the script is described as William Shatner but seems to me more like a Liam Neesom type) records in the ship’s log that the ship is on course to Havana. Looking at the location of Atlantis on Crowley’s globe from later in the episode, I think they may have been blown somewhat off course:

But then, what would you expect from a cruise ship whose name is the medical term for an infectious disease (measles)? I do rather like the insinuation that cruise guests are so stupid as to believe the ship’s crew capable of raising an entire continent from the deep, complete with its citizens, purely for their entertainment though. Light-hearted as this scene is, it serves as a neat little bridge from the previous episode, where the last thing we saw was the consequences of Adam coming into his power, albeit in unexpected ways. It sounds like the voices are getting stronger and clearer for him now too, seeing as we’re able to make out words and full sentences this time around. And if we were at all unclear as to what exactly Adam’s powers consist of, he spells it out for us, his earnest words underpinned by come creepy child choir soundtrack to really hammer home their meaning:

What I say I true.

Just in case there was any doubt about the intelligence levels of the cruise guests, we have another little dig here in the form of a Facebook post by one of them.

The long-lost continent of Atlantis has suddenly appeared out of nowhere, which means the ship can’t go anywhere, but don’t worry – the Captain has sent a bottle of Champagne to make up for it. Cretin.

For those amongst you who aren’t native to the UK (or don’t watch the news, and honestly who would blame you), the newsreader in this scene is an actual newsreader (rather than an actress playing one) called Kirsty Wark. I think little things like this are really important to contributing to the charm and appeal of the series – it blurs the lines between the story and reality, but also really assists with the show’s relatability.

So, elephant in room question. Questions actually I think.

Why is Gabriel on Earth?

Why is Gabriel jogging on Earth?

Why is Gabriel jogging on Earth where Aziraphale is?

Why is Gabriel jogging on Earth where Aziraphale is, which also happens to be the place where Aziraphale and Crowley had their break-up the night before?

These are all questions I had from the very first watch of the show, and it’s never addressed. I just can’t get my head around any of it, perhaps because I get hung up on wondering if Aziraphale came back to the park or whether he’s still there from the night before. Maybe waiting to see if Crowley will come back. After that I’m not capable of thinking of much else in a logical way because that is just too angsty. What we do know is that Aziraphale is still nervous – he’s wringing his hands. Not nervous enough to not look intrigued by the human interpretation of an angel’s appearance though. Almost so intrigued he misses Gabriel. I can’t quite work out whether his expression says he’s surprised to see the archangel or whether he’s just spurred into action. If it’s the former, then I think we really are in the “Aziraphale has been hanging around the park all night pining” territory. If it’s the latter (which, I’m inclined to think it is, the directions in the script state that he’s looking for someone at this point), I’d really like to know how he knew Gabriel was going to be there in the first place. Either way, I really love the way that Aziraphale starts this conversation in the exact same way that his phone conversations with Crowley usually start (“It’s me.”) – it’s such a casual way to start a conversation, mostly reserved for situations where there is a level of familiarity between the participants that betrays how comfortable they are with one another. It’s also a very human interaction, one which Gabriel does not appear able to understand the nuances of – after all, it is a pretty obvious thing to say isn’t it?

I have to call attention to the level of detail that has gone into the production of this series here, and this time the credit goes to the costume department. They could have had Gabriel running in a very plain set of running clothes, but no – they had to go and add a little hint to his true nature, embroidered right there on his sweater:

So subtle, but it just goes to show how much thought went into every single aspect of this show. It might not be an intricately detailed suit, or a deliberately distressed demon outfit, but this tiny detail is still capable of reminding us of the true nature of the characters we’re watching.

I’m fairly sure that Gabriel’s assertion that the purpose of war is so that they can win it is probably the main reason why most wars are fought. Which is, quite honestly, batshit crazy. Gabriel doesn’t think so though – he can’t understand what Aziraphale’s problem is with this ridiculous catch-22 situation, oblivious to our angel’s very obvious distress:

I find the use of the word “soft” here interesting. I think the meaning of the word in Aziraphale’s mind is very complicated – he’s not really talking about his lack of physical prowess (not my opinion, just reiterating what Gabriel so hurtfully said previously) but his attachment to Earth as a whole, which would no doubt be perceived by Heaven as having gone “soft”. The irony is that his “softness”, perceived at this point by him and others as weak, is exactly what draws us to him as a character, forming an essential part of his make-up as a hero character.

Moving on, it looks like Lesley (the International Express delivery man) is quite the foreshadower of his own fate.

Ours is not to reason why. Ours is to deliver packages.

I’m sure most people will know that the way the second part of this line should end is nothing to do with delivering packages, but should instead be “to do and die”. It’s a very well-known quote, even if it is slightly altered from the original, from Tennyson’s Charge of the Light Brigade, underlining the fact that soldiers should not question the purpose of their service, only to perform their duties and give their life when necessary. Which is exactly what Lesley is about to do with his deliveries, even if he is ignorant of the fact that he’s been drafted as the harbinger of Armageddon.

Quick note: I love that view from Heaven! It’s another one of those little things that you only see for a moment, and if you’re not concentrating, you might think it’s just any old cityscape but let’s take a quick inventory, shall we?

From left to right:

The Eiffel Tower.

Big Ben.

Mountains.

Empire State Building.

The London Eye.

The Shard.

Pyramids.

There are maybe some others (in a later shot you can also see what looks like St Paul’s cathedral), but you get the idea – there’s no way that all of those things could be in one view - some of them are in different continents to each other. It’s a pretty cool view though, I wonder if you can Airbnb up there?

We now have the first firm indication that things are getting tricky for our hero pair. “Earth observation files” you say? That sounds decidedly problematic. I do love how Gabriel genuinely seems to think there would be an innocent explanation for an angel and demon to have met multiple times, though in his defence none of the photos he is presented with show the pair with anything other than neutral expressions. What this exchange does inform us of is that the suspicions surrounding Aziraphale have only been incited owing to his recent comments – he really has been fooling them completely for the last 6000 years, and even when they do catch on Michael’s first thought is that he’s a double agent. Not a bad record if you ask me. I think it’s pretty spiteful of Michael to turn Crowley in to Hell at this point – they must know that he’s not working for Heaven, and would be aware that Hell are probably going to take an even harsher stance towards any descent in the ranks they suspect.

Here we go, another (side) note of appreciation (it’s easy to rack these up when the emotional angst isn’t so high). I don’t know whether the chameleon on Ligur’s head is an animatronic prop or CGI, but the fact that it moves, seemingly independently, is yet another beautiful detail that is easy to miss.

Back with Crowley, we find out that he’s still intending on running. It’s here that we find out that he had a hand in creating some of the component parts of the universe, and we have the first mention of Alpha Centauri as being a favoured destination. It feels like an obvious statement to make that the choice of this particular constellation was owing to it being made of two words starting with “A” and “C” but Neil has been asked this question before and stated that its use was purely circumstantial. I’m not sure I fully believe that but maybe that’s just me. My heart goes out to Crowley in this scene – he looks truly defeated. So defeated that he actually tries to reason with God in a tone that could be described as pleading. And in contrast to Gabriel’s description of the reason for Crowley’s fall (that he was one of the rebelling forces against Heaven), we see here that Crowley’s take on the situation is quite different.

Four episodes in and we’re still being introduced to new characters – hello, Pollution. We are given some backstory about why this Horseman isn’t the traditionally-known Pestilence, and I think I read somewhere that this was a conscious substitution made by Neil and Terry to make it feel more relevant/current but I can’t find that source now. Interestingly, the name for the recipient of the crown is given on the delivery form as “Mr. White”, but Lesley refers to them as “Chalky”, a continuation of the theme that there are many names for each of the Horsemen, all of which allude to the same thing.

I find white to be an interesting colour association to make with Pollution – many of us would associate it with cleanliness and purity, the complete opposite of what this Horseman stands for.

Lesley’s final delivery instructions are communicated in a handwritten note:

He is clearly aware of the connotations of this delivery, leaving a note for his beloved Maud. Quite why he doesn’t just “fuck this shit” at this point is a mystery to me – I certainly would have done. Perhaps it’s a callback to his Tennyson quote from earlier. I do find myself wondering if he might have avoided Armageddon himself if he had just done the sensible thing though – after all, he has been (unknowingly) tasked with summoning the Horsemen of the Apocalypse, without which there can be no Armageddon. What if he had just refused to make the last of his deliveries? Regardless, the sequence representing his death shows firstly the colour starting to bleed out of the footage before he dissolves into starlight – a recurring theme in Neil’s work.

On to lighter things now – here’s Anathema doing that creepy thing of offering virtually unknown children food again. I love how Bryan’s initial concern about the chocolate is that he thinks it’s coming from a witch. Never mind “stranger danger”, what you really have to watch out for is those witches. Sounds like he’s well suited for a position in the Witchfinder Army.

It’s not unexpected that Shadwell has Jerusalem playing in his (gross) apartment, I think he probably plays that recording on a loop so as to continue feeding his delusions that his insanity is driven by a deep love for his country. The particular line of the song playing here (“in England’s dark Satanic mills”) is pretty well-timed though, seeing as it won’t be long until everything in England has a distinctly devilish tone to it. There’s also an irony to Shadwell’s farewell:

May the armies of glory march beside ye.

I don’t really think that’s a good idea, seeing as how they’re perfectly comfortable with wiping out the entire human race for the sole purpose of winning an argument…

There’s another throwback to Adam’s imagination becoming real in the next scene, with the UFO that Newton witnesses having the same design as the one we saw hanging from Adam’s bookcase earlier in the episode:

And I love the use of the theremin in the soundtrack – nothing screams an old school UFO and aliens more than the sound of a theremin!

Side note: the mention of a “neuter” gender by the alien is in the original book, written in 1996. I hope I’m not being offensive by crediting Neil and Terry with being massively ahead of their time in their support of the LGBTQ+ community there, and applaud them for being beacons of what we should all aspire to be.

Secondary side note: anybody else get Douglas Adams vibes from this alien conversation? For me it really conjures memories of a different universe where an alien race showed up to destroy Earth to make way for a new hyperspace bypass…

We’re back with The Them, with Wensleydale kindly reminding us that whales have big brains, for the third time in this series. I think it’s fair to say that we should be aware each of the children have their own distinct personalities, given the scripting and acting that we have seen up to this point. If we were in any doubt though, it’s really underlined by the fact that they each have a different type of ice lolly.

Again I say the level of attention to detail in this show is truly astounding. We’ll see more of it in the next scene where we see Ligur’s chameleon not only moving independently but that its skin actually cycles though a range a colours. That said, I do have a question about the information available to Anathema in the next scene:

The full prophecy on the card shows us a lot more information than is narrated in the show (like how she knew he was a Witchfinder, and that his descendant was responsible for the death of her own). What it doesn’t say is how she knows exactly the date and time of his arrival. That information isn’t even in any of the scribbled notes on the card. I guess we’ll never know how she comes to find this out.

And on that quandry, I’m going to wrap it up for this part of the episode write up. I realise it’s a slightly odd place in the episode to call it a day, but if I finish here I can use the Fields of Megiddo signpost to head the next part (told you I was a sucker for consistency). So as always, questions, comments, discussion – always welcome.

[mortaljortlebortles]

Douglas is cancelled

I loved this show but the very end the hotel room her interview-it didn't give me what I wanted.

I mean obviously Madiline f-ed up with a few things- she shouldn't have been tactile when trying to find out the truth- nor used that to manipulate him- he was uncomfortable so she should have stopped.

I get it is revenge and like I get it but i kinda wished she had found another way.

Also in the final piece of hotel scene before the hay festival, I wish that taking a photo of Toby hadn't been presented as the best option she had. I respect her choice - in terms of she didn't know what else to do but I do think it feeds into the narrative that a strong woman would have found a way to escape and that blackmailint some with leaking nudes is a tactic that is safe or the best option - she could also be convicted ( she shouldn't be but she could be)

Also it seemed to shame people who would be afraid or desperate for the job enough to sleep with him- sleeping with a superior for something if you aren't scared is morally neuteral(for you) I would reckon- so long as you are single. I don't judge. I judge the boss though it is horrible.

If she was scared for her future career anywhere- and how Toby could manipulate her and so stayed and he had pressured her into s-x that is s/a no two ways about it.

if she had stayed and not done anything with him he would still be a horrible man who sexually harassed her and an absolute arsehole.

And that is why I am posting so that if anybody out there saw this and thought Douglas was right when he said "phone the police- your regretting your choice then phone your mum or your best friend"

He very much isn't Madaline knows that, Stephen Moffat knows that .don't beat your self up, okay.

and then the whole it is a win for me not for women thing is fair if that is the way you feel(being proud of yourself and not wanting to think your achievement is only impressive because you are a woman prehaps.

It also may not be a problem she won for her and it doesn't stop anything involving toby - she is afraid, you might be afriad, not everybody has the ability and stabilty and safety net to stand up to such things. That doesn't mean she is horrible

I don't like however the fact she is naive enough to not see women are a group of people who are mistreated(because we are women) and our sucess does mean something for others as does our losses( when a woman is hurt it makes women afraid). I do wish Moffat would have made it more just violence does happen to women because they are women for five sesonds- Mad's opinions being the closest to right just means somepeople I reckon will twist it so that they can victim blame women for being too soft or weak or say bad things only happen to women who aren't strong enough or that women need to deal with these things themselves rather than joining together. I mean it is obvious violence and mistreatment of women from men is a problem but I have met so many men who don't believe these things happen often or at all and I am borded of educating men ages 18 to 30 at the age of 19 because subtlty and nuance goes over my guy Luke's head.

it is very complex and cool- obviously doesn't represent the young or activists or people with anxiety/autism very well and that sucks but it is great tv - very dramatic and well filmed, with great acting and lots of layers or good and bad and sad in all of the characters. I mean one just calm nice unbullied person would have been great but i suppose Kirsty Wark is a nice person so her 2 minute appearance might count.

I loved the script and it is very worth a watch and it isn't trying to be so problematic for me, or you potentially, it's just Madalyn is a total Talitha at points and some people see only in black and white.

So all the we should all aim for human rights stuff though true lacks a framework to hang on that doesn't result in a mixed message possibly.

[jac-is-procrastinating-again]

Good Omens S1 Ep4

Kirsty Wark!

Gabriel jogging on earth?? (he has pink wings on his tracksuit).

Awwww... Az is supposed to be a lean mean fighting machine according to Gabriel who tells him to lose the gut. Az looks all despondent and says he's soft. Gabriel asks where the flaming sword is. Argh!!

Michael has sussed Az and C. Gabriel gives her permission to chase them up. Michael grasses them up to Hell who were sure they can trust him.

C's big book of stars - he doesn't read books. Also, in S2, "beautiful nebula, look at that." wonder who might have given him a book about something he made himself? C's crisis moment hanging off his chair.

"Angels don't dance. It's one of the defining characteristics of an angel. " Apart from Az who does a mean gavotte. Demons do, not what you could call good dancing though.

Being humans means choices. Az doesn't want to takes sides, so they punch him in the stomach. his reaction; "You mustn't, why would you, we're the good guys!" "You - you - you BAD angels!"

[news2024news]

Tributes pour in for Kirsty Wark after she presents BBC Newsnight for the last time http://dlvr.it/T9Xs3L

[angiefsutton]

The Passion of Port Talbot

If you're a fan of Michael Sheen or theatre (or both), this audio documentary is a must listen.

[tracksterman]

Good episode. The 2015 movie Everest is also currently free on Prime.

[drowndrawn]

Because they are too busy removing the corpses of their children of the rubble after yet another Israeli bomb (because they have already dropped the equivalent of a quarter of an atomic bomb there).

Do you think they have time to march the streets when they entire families have been wiped out?

The Palestine ambassador lost 7 members of his family, including 2 children, and the interviewer just keeps asking him to condone Hamas. She's not even able to give her condolences in her blindness.

It's easy for you to think to go out in the street in protest, to leave your comfortable home with your belly full to express "what you think it's right", but they barely have water, their homes aren't safe, they don't have food (all of it because Israel bombed them and cut off their access to the things most basic for a human to survive, Hamas didn't do it, it was Israel who decided to take revenge on all Palestinians in Gaza).

How come they would protest if they don't even have time to give?

Another thing to note is that, different than protests of white people in the safe heavens of west, Palestinians are severly repressed by the Palestinian Authority themselves. The last time a 12 year old girl was killed by them.

You're also drawing the wrong parallels with Nazi Germany (don't forget that ethnic cleansing is an euphemism for genocide).

Beyond that, to think they should protest to "remove" or "hand out" Hamas, their so to speak resistance goes as the argument below.

We are told that most Palestinians do not support Hamas.

Very well.

Where then are the large scale Palestinian protests demanding Hamas release the abducted hostages - children, toddlers, grandparents, civilians - immediately and unconditionally?

Where then is the sole Palestinian protester standing in Times or Trafalgar Square with a sign that says “Not in My Name”?

Where is the one Palestinian intellectual who will write an op-ed expressing deep shame that acts of the greatest cruelty in human history were carried out in the name of “Free Palestine” and “From the River to the Sea”?

If the PLO, Fatah and Palestinian Authority represent moderate Palestinians, where is the outcry? The horror? The heartfelt denunciations? Why must international pressure be fruitlessly brought to bear to try to elicit even a pale shadow of them?

If Hamas is not supported in Gaza, where then is the Palestinian in Gaza who will come forth with information about the hostages?

Even in Nazi Germany, when some Germans understood that Hitler was bringing disaster on their country, there were those who attempted to assassinate him. Where are the Palestinians in Gaza who will take action against Hamas?

And why is it that the instinctive response of so many to these questions is to make excuses as to why not even one of these things should be expected of any Palestinian anywhere? 

We finally have courageous Arab and Muslim inspirational voices expressing those feelings and ideas. Why then is so little expected of Palestinians?

[nonesuchrecords]

Natalie Merchant was live on BBC Radio 4’s Start the Week this morning to talk with presenter Kirsty Wark and fellow guests Jeffrey Boakye and Michel Faber about her new album, Keep Your Courage, and more. You can hear their conversation here. Merchant begins her European tour in Berlin tomorrow, followed by two nights at London Palladium.

[qudachuk]

Wark presented BBC’s flagship news programme for 30 years

[kurtlukiraz]

Ancak görünen o ki Moffat, dün geceki (25 Eylül Pazartesi) Haber Gecesi'ndeki sorudan kaçınarak, bu olasılık etrafında tantana yapmayı açıkça reddediyor.Bilgilerinizi girerek şunları kabul etmiş olursunuz: Şartlar ve koşullar Ve Gizlilik Politikası. Aboneliğinizi istediğiniz zaman iptal edebilirsiniz.Newsnight sunucusu Kirsty Wark hiç vakit kaybetmeden Moffat'ı dizi hakkında sorguladı ve ona "bir şekilde Doctor Who'ya" geri dönüp dönmeyeceğini sordu."Ne? Yarın Cardiff'te mi uyanacağım?" Moffat gülerek şunu sordu: "Newsnight'ta bana bunun sorulduğuna inanamıyorum."Şöyle devam etti: "Doctor Who'yu bırakmam gerçekten çok yeni... Bakın, seviyorum, Doctor Who'ya kesinlikle bayılıyorum, bu en muhteşem dizi. Ama Russell ile çok emin ellerde. [T Davies]"Wark, Moffat'ın sözünü keserek sorusuna yanıt vermediğini iddia etti ve "bir şekilde" geri dönüp dönmeyeceğini tekrarladı. Moffat yanıt verdi: "Ben bir politikacı mıyım? Sorularınıza cevap vermek zorunda mıyım?"Wark soruyu başka bir şekilde ifade etti ve bunun yerine Moffat'ın serinin "çekiciliğini" hissedip hissetmediğini sordu ve şu cevabı verdi: "Ah, evet, her zaman Russell'la iletişim halinde kalıyorum ve ona ne yaptığını soruyorum vesaire, tabii ki Yapmak."Bu, yarın trenle Cardiff'e doğru yola çıkacağım anlamına gelmiyor; tabii eğer öyle değilsem..."Açık uçlu son cevap, hayranların Moffat'ın sadece söylentilere mi oynadığı yoksa gerçekten yaklaşan Doctor Who yapımlarının bir parçası mı olabileceği konusunda merak etmesine neden oldu.Devamını oku: Geçtiğimiz Ağustos gibi yakın bir tarihte, yapım notları Doctor Who Dergisi'nde yayınlandıktan sonra hayranlar, Moffat'ın Ncuti Gatwa'nın ilk sezonunda yer alıp almadığını sorgulamaya başladı.Bir elenme vakasıyla hayranlar, "şu anda gezegenin diğer tarafında" olarak tanımlanan yazarın Moffat olabileceğini, Instagram gönderilerinin gizemli bir yerde bir yatta tatil yaptığını ortaya çıkardıktan sonra hemen fark etti.Davies, beklenen yeni sezonda dizi sorumlusu olarak geri dönse de, Moffat'ın programdaki geleceği bir sır olarak kalmaya devam ediyor ve daha önce RadioTimes.com'a şunları söylemişti: "Benim standartlarıma göre bile, genç bir oyuncu olarak geri dönmek kariyer çılgınlığı olurdu. Eskiden yürüttüğüm bir gösteri" dedi. "Bunu yapmam için deli olmam gerekir..."Doctor Who, BBC iPlayer'da yayınlanmaya hazır. Klasik dizinin bölümleri yayınlanabilecek BritBox'ta - 7 günlük ücretsiz denemeye buradan kaydolabilirsiniz.Daha fazla Bilim Kurgu kapsamımıza göz atın veya neler olduğunu öğrenmek için TV Rehberimizi ve Yayın Rehberimizi ziyaret edin.Radio Times dergisini bugün deneyin ve yalnızca 10 £ karşılığında 10 sayıya sahip olun, AYRICA evinize teslim edilen 10 £ John Lewis and Partners kuponu da alın - hemen abone olun. TV'nin en büyük yıldızlarından daha fazlası için The Radio Times Podcast'ini dinleyin.

[gundemburadadedim]

Ancak görünen o ki Moffat, dün geceki (25 Eylül Pazartesi) Haber Gecesi'ndeki sorudan kaçınarak, bu olasılık etrafında tantana yapmayı açıkça reddediyor.Bilgilerinizi girerek şunları kabul etmiş olursunuz: Şartlar ve koşullar Ve Gizlilik Politikası. Aboneliğinizi istediğiniz zaman iptal edebilirsiniz.Newsnight sunucusu Kirsty Wark hiç vakit kaybetmeden Moffat'ı dizi hakkında sorguladı ve ona "bir şekilde Doctor Who'ya" geri dönüp dönmeyeceğini sordu."Ne? Yarın Cardiff'te mi uyanacağım?" Moffat gülerek şunu sordu: "Newsnight'ta bana bunun sorulduğuna inanamıyorum."Şöyle devam etti: "Doctor Who'yu bırakmam gerçekten çok yeni... Bakın, seviyorum, Doctor Who'ya kesinlikle bayılıyorum, bu en muhteşem dizi. Ama Russell ile çok emin ellerde. [T Davies]"Wark, Moffat'ın sözünü keserek sorusuna yanıt vermediğini iddia etti ve "bir şekilde" geri dönüp dönmeyeceğini tekrarladı. Moffat yanıt verdi: "Ben bir politikacı mıyım? Sorularınıza cevap vermek zorunda mıyım?"Wark soruyu başka bir şekilde ifade etti ve bunun yerine Moffat'ın serinin "çekiciliğini" hissedip hissetmediğini sordu ve şu cevabı verdi: "Ah, evet, her zaman Russell'la iletişim halinde kalıyorum ve ona ne yaptığını soruyorum vesaire, tabii ki Yapmak."Bu, yarın trenle Cardiff'e doğru yola çıkacağım anlamına gelmiyor; tabii eğer öyle değilsem..."Açık uçlu son cevap, hayranların Moffat'ın sadece söylentilere mi oynadığı yoksa gerçekten yaklaşan Doctor Who yapımlarının bir parçası mı olabileceği konusunda merak etmesine neden oldu.Devamını oku: Geçtiğimiz Ağustos gibi yakın bir tarihte, yapım notları Doctor Who Dergisi'nde yayınlandıktan sonra hayranlar, Moffat'ın Ncuti Gatwa'nın ilk sezonunda yer alıp almadığını sorgulamaya başladı.Bir elenme vakasıyla hayranlar, "şu anda gezegenin diğer tarafında" olarak tanımlanan yazarın Moffat olabileceğini, Instagram gönderilerinin gizemli bir yerde bir yatta tatil yaptığını ortaya çıkardıktan sonra hemen fark etti.Davies, beklenen yeni sezonda dizi sorumlusu olarak geri dönse de, Moffat'ın programdaki geleceği bir sır olarak kalmaya devam ediyor ve daha önce RadioTimes.com'a şunları söylemişti: "Benim standartlarıma göre bile, genç bir oyuncu olarak geri dönmek kariyer çılgınlığı olurdu. Eskiden yürüttüğüm bir gösteri" dedi. "Bunu yapmam için deli olmam gerekir..."Doctor Who, BBC iPlayer'da yayınlanmaya hazır. Klasik dizinin bölümleri yayınlanabilecek BritBox'ta - 7 günlük ücretsiz denemeye buradan kaydolabilirsiniz.Daha fazla Bilim Kurgu kapsamımıza göz atın veya neler olduğunu öğrenmek için TV Rehberimizi ve Yayın Rehberimizi ziyaret edin.Radio Times dergisini bugün deneyin ve yalnızca 10 £ karşılığında 10 sayıya sahip olun, AYRICA evinize teslim edilen 10 £ John Lewis and Partners kuponu da alın - hemen abone olun. TV'nin en büyük yıldızlarından daha fazlası için The Radio Times Podcast'ini dinleyin.

[dutty-lingo]

💥✊🏾💥The Reunion