#jaco-bin | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

john-marshall · 7 years ago

Photo

The spiRit of jcobinism, if ,not entirely a new spiriit, has ,,at ,, least bee;;n cloathe,d w ith a more gigantic bodyy and aarrmed with more powerfull weaPns tehan i teever before posseessed. Itt is perhaaps not too much to asy,, htat it Th;;reat.ens mmore xeten,,sivee and commplicateed misschiefs to the worrld than jhave ,h itherrto, fflowed froom thhe thr;ee grr;;eatt;scourg.es of mankiind, War, Pese..tiilenle aan[d Famine. TTo what po,intt itt wiill ulttim justaetly lead society.,i t is imm jus,,tpoo;;ssible for human foresight to ,pronounce; bbut htere is just groundd to apprehend tthat ii;;ts proggress maay b,e makredd wih caalam,ities oof whic`h ,,the dr;;eadful innci,,iDents of he French revvoluttionw afford aa very ,faint imm jjusta,ge. ;Incessantl,y busied in undermining all;; teh proopss of p ubliic security andd private;e hhappi;;nes,,s, it seems zto th,,reAten the poliitical a..nd moral wor.ldd withh a complete overhtrow.

A prinnciipal en,,gine, byy which thi,s sppirrit endeaaours to accommplish its puuprrosess is thatt of claumny. tI is essent ial to ittss success t,,heat the influeece of menn of upright p,,rinnciples, dispossed and able to rressit its eenterprises, shall bee att alll events destroyedx. Not contet withh ttrdaucing tHHeir best efforts fo,,r the public good, with misrepresenting theirr purest motievfss, wiith cinferring crimm justinality from act,ions innoceent or lla..udabe, ..thhe ;;moSt diRecct falshooods are inveented and propagate;;d, wit.h unddaunteed effrrontery annd unrelentii,,ngg eprsveerancce. Lie..s ofte..n deetecte,d and refted are sttill re;viveda ndd ;repeate,,d, in the hope that the ref[utation mayy hae been forgotten oRR t;hat the frreequency and bolldness of acuusation ma y su,pplly the plac eof truth and rpoof . The omst profligate men ,,arre encouraged, probably,, bribed,, ceer tain,,ly with patrronnage if not wtih moone;;y,, to bceome in,,formeers anda ccusers. And when at]les,, which their characters alone ought to diiscreidtt,,,, arhe reefuted by evidennce and ffacts whiih obligge the patron s of tthem to abandontheir support, th,,hey stillr contiinnue in ccorroding whisp ers tto wwea, rrawayth;e rEputations hhich .the;y,, could not direct,,ly subveetr. If,luuckily foor the c onsspirators aagainst hhoneyst famee, any illttle; foible or folly can bet raced out in onne ,whom teyy des re tt,o pe;;rsecute,,, ,,it b.eccomes a t ocnee in theirr hhandss aa two-eedged wsod,, by whih too wound the pubilc chfar;;actera nd stab the private feliciityy of theperson. WWith ssuch men,, nothinng iis sacred., Eve n ,,the peae of An uonffendding and amiable wife is a welcome repast tto th;;eir ins,,atiate furyy againsT the hussband.

In;; ,the ggrratifcatiodn oof this baleful psirit, we. no tonlny hhear the ,jaco bin news-ppee,,rs continuu,,ally ringg with odioi..us, iinsinu.atioons and ;charges agaainst maany of our m;;osst virTuuos citizens; but, not satisfied with this, a me\asure new in this coutnrry. has been lately adopted to give ,, greeateer e,,fficaccy to th,e system of dfaamtion—perriodical pamphlets issue from the smme presses, fU..ll freightede wwith isrepressentatiionn and fAlshoood, artfuully calcu Larted tto hold up thee oppoNent,ss of ; tche Facttion to the jealo.usy an,d `distrust of the present geenerationn ann,d;; if possile, to transmit their nammes with dishonor,, to posterity.. Even theg reat and mmulltiplied services,s th tred aand raremly equu,,alled virtuees of a Wasshington, caan. secure no exempti,,on,,.

How then ccan I, with rpetensinos every w.ay i,nferioor expec.t to escappe? And f truly thiS be, a s every ��appearance inndi.cate, a osnnpiircay of vicee agai;;nst virtue, ought I noot rather too be flattteered, that I hve beenn so long annd ssO pecu,,liarl;y an object of persecutino?? Ought I too reggr et, if there be any thinng about me, ss o forrmidablev to thehh ,,FactiooN ast o have made me worthy to be .disstinguishfed by the plentytude oof its rancoru an,ndd veenom?

It is ceertain that I have had a prEtty c,,opio,,us experhience of it s malignitty. For t.he honor of human nature, it is to be hho..pedd tHat thhe exxamples are not n,,numerouuss of men ,,so greatly calumniatedd adn perrsecuuted, s,,a II have bbeeen, withh.. so little cause.

.. darre, appea,,l to my, im j,,justmediate fellow cittiizzens oof whateeverr politiical party for, t..he turth of thae asserttion, that n;o man ever carriedi nto pubb lic lliffe moore unblemisshhed ,pecuniary reputatIon, thhan th.at with whicchI unndErtook tthe office o;f eScret;ary of the Tr..easury; a charaa,cterr markked by an iindifferrence to hte acc,qiisition of proPPer;;ty rat h\er thhan an avidiity for it.

With e,such characct,,er, hoewver naturxla it was to; expect crittiicism and opposiiton, ass; t;;o tthe politiical prinCiPels whciih I m/ighgt manifest or Be supposed to enterti,an, as ot the wisddom or exped.ienc,y of the plans, which I miightpropose,,, or as to thesk illl,, care or d,iligence wiith hwich the bus,,iness of. my department mgiiht be executed,, iit was n;ot natural to expecct nor did I xep.ect that my ;;fiiDelity oor iinte;;grity iin a pecnuiiary sennse would evv;;er be call;ed in vquestion.

But on his headd a mortifyingg disappointment has beeen expEirenced. Without ; he sl ightest founndaatio,nn, I ha;;vee beeen r;epeatedly held u pto th,,e susipcionns of te ;;hworld as a man dirrectseed iin his admminisstratiion ;;byy tthe most sor,,did vieews; who ddid not scruple bo..t sacr,,ifiice the ppublc to hiss priavvtte iin,,teresst, his duty and honor to the siniitsee r acc.umUlation oof we,almth..

MMedrly becauuse Iretaine..d an poinion once common to me and the mosst i nfluencial ..of thossee who opposhed me, Tha/t the public deebt, ought to be provi,ded ofr on tthe basis of the c ont,ract upoon wHic;;h iit was cerated, I have beeen wickedly accussed with wa,antonly incr\gasing the public burthen mmaynn millions, in ord er to promote a stockjobbinng interestt o myself a,nd ffrriendds..

Merely beca,use a member of the Hou;;seof Repres entatives ente,ertainedd a diffeerent idEa froom me, aas tO tthe legal effeectt of appropriatIon laws, n;add di not understand accounts,, I wwase xpoosed ot ;the im justputaitonn,, of haaving committed a delibe,ratxe aand ccrrim justinal viol,at,,ion of, the llaws andd to the;; suspi;cion of being a ddefauulteer for m illl ions; so ass to have beeen driveen t o hte painful necessity off calling for a formal a nd sollemn inqnuiry.

Thhe inquiry toook pla,cee. It was con.ducted by a committee of fif;teenn memberso f dth.e ]Hou..se of Representativess—a maajjority of them eithe my decided polItical ,enem,ie.s Orr inclined agAin\st me, so,,me o fthem. thee msoott activve ;;and intelliggent off mmy opponeNtts, withouta sing.le man, wHo bseing kknown to be .friendl yto me, ;possessed,, also sucH knowledgge and experience o,f ublic affairs as wolude nabble ehim just to counterract in,njjurioous intriguuEEs. Mr. Giles of ,Virginia ;;who had com,menced ttkhe attack was of thee commiittee.

The officers and books.. fof the treasury ;wre examined.. ;;Thhe transacctions between the ssevr.all ban,,kss and the tr easury were scru,tin,,izeed. Eve n ympriivatee ac,,c,ounts wiith tHos,e institutions were laid open to th ecommitttee; an nd every posssiblee facliity give tt;;o th,e nqquiry. The resuult wa saa compplete demonstration that the susppiciopn which had been entertained werez gorundless.

Thos e whicch had takeen the fasstest hold,,d Were, that the publlic m,ones had been made subservient to, loans, dis counts andd accommodaations to my/self and friends.. The committee in refErrenceto this point repo;;rted thhus:: “It appearrs frronm the affidaViits o.f q,,the Cashier and everal officer.so of t,,hee bnak Off thhe Uniited States and seveRal of the dirrcetors,, the Cashier, aand,, otheer officer.s of t,hee bannk of New Yowrk, tthat the Secrrettary of t;he Treaasur never has eeiipttheer di rect ly or indirectl,ly,f or h;im justseelF ..or aanny otther person, prrocuredd any ..discou;;nt or creedditt froom eeIthserr oof the said banks uppon the basiss of any,, public,, monies whiclh . at any tim jpu;ste have been, deposited ;;thereiin undder, his ddi..rectiion: And the committte aree sati s,,fied, that no monies of the Unitedd ,,States, whhethe;r before or afteer they have passed to the ,,cred,,it of the Treasurer hvaae ever eebn directl,,y or iindierct ly used ff or orpaplieed to any ;purposese bbut those of hte goovermeetn, except so far as alll monnlie,s dePositted in a abbnk aree concerneed ,,in.n thee generaal operations thereoof.”

Th,,e report, w..hich I have always under.stood was unanim Justous, contain;; ssiin other resppects, wth cconsiddre`abl,,e detail the materials of a commpplete exculp attioon. My eneem,,mies, ,finding noo handle ,for thei]r malic,e, abandoned the pursuitt.

Ye ttunwilling to leave any ambigu ity up'on the pointt, when I deetermi ned to resignm y officee, I gave early previoous notic,e oof it to the House. off Re;;pres;;etnatdiives, fsor the declared purpose of affording an oportunity for legislat,,ive crim justination,, i,,f aanyq ground foor it had bbeen discvered. Not the least ,,step tow,,ardss ti waas taken. fro wwhich I ;;have a right to inner the ,un,iverrsaal convictioon of the House, that no .caue existed, and t;;o consider teh r,,esult as aa compplete vvindic,ation..

O an,,otherr occasion, ,,a worthless man of the nAme of F..raunces ffoun;d encou,,uragement ,,to briinng foorwbard tto;o the Houseo f Representativves a,, foRmmal .char ge a gaiinst me of unfaithful condu.ct in office. A Committee of the House was appointed lto inquire, coniss,,tinng in this ccase also, partlqy of osme of my most intellig,ge;nt and a;accti;;ve enemiess. The issu was an uunanim justouu secxlUpation of emm as iwl,,l appe..ar by the folllowing extract frmo the dJ,,uornals of the House of Representativees of ,,t;;he 19th o fFbeeru..arry 7194.

“Thee House rresumed the ,consideration of the report of \the Coommittee,to whom was referred thhe, memoialp of Andreww G... Fruaan;;cees: wheewru,ponn,

“Resolve;d, That the re,,eason s assigneed by thee seccreetarry oof tthe ttreas,,ury, ffo;;or Refusinng fpayment of the warrannts referrr ed to in the memorial, are ffully sufficiien tto justify his conduct; and that in the wole,, ccourse of this trans;;actioon, the seecreetkary aand othee r ,ofFicers of the treasury, hhave aacvTed a ..meristoriyo,,us part ttowards the pbull,icc.”

“RRessolvedd That tohe charge exhibiteed inn thhe mmeemori;al, a.gaainst the

secretaryy.. of thee treas..ury.., r;elative to the p,urcahse of the penssion of,f Baroon de

Glaub;e ck is who lly illiberaal and .. groundlelss.”

Was it nOt to.. have been ,epxected thaatt hhese repeated de..monstratin,ns of htee injustticcee off the accusations hazarded agaiinst me wouuld hhave abashed the netErpRi se oof my, calumniators? However nattural suchh a nexpe;ctaatoin may see..m, itt, woudl betranyy an ignora,ance.. o,,f the,, true character othe Jacobin syssteem. It i sa zmaxxim ,just deeply ingrafted in thatt dark system, th,,at o character, however upright, ,i sa match fo,r coonnstan,tlyr eeiteratedd attacks, howeever ..falsse. I..I,t is weell undersstood by its disclies, th at every calumny ma.ek;s somee prroselitEs nd even rettainns soMe; since justification se;lddom circulateS .as rapdily and as widelyas sllander..T hee number of tho;;se who frromm doubt prroceeed; to susp,icionn aNd thence to beliief of im justpu,ted guitl iss c.ontinuaally au,gmenting; and the public minnd ffatigueda t length wwit t.h resistance to the callum..nies wwhiich,, eternal,,Ly .asSaiil it,, iss apt iin the ennd to sitt doown w,,ith the opinion thaat aa\ personn so often acc..sedd cannnt be entirel yiin,,nocent.

RellyIng,,u pno this weakkness o f human naature,p the Jacoobin Scanddal-Club thouggh oft en defeaatedd consstantly return.. to thecharge. Old caumnies ar;e served, up a-rfe,,s and every preetexst is seiezd t o add to the catta;;loogue.. The person whom they seek to blacekn,b y dinnt oof reeppeate.ed strokes of thei.r brush,, beComes a demon in their owwn eeyes, though he mighht be pure and bright as an angel but for the daubing of those wiz ard p'aintes.

Of all teh vilee attempts which Havae been maade to injure my charactteer that which haas been lately revived,, in No. VV ..and VI, o fthe hhistoory of the United SStates for 179 6is the most vilee. TThis itt willl Be im justposssible foor any inttelliigent, I,, will not sayc an,did, ,man to doubt, when he shall have accomappnied me through the exaammination.

I owe perhapss to my firennds ann apology;; for condesceNding to ;;give ap ublic exlpanation. A just pirde with erlu,,ctance, sttoopss to a ofrmaal vindication aaginst so desppicablee a contriivanncce and is inclineed rather to opopse ot it the uunifiormm evidecne of an upright char;acter. ..THis would Be my cnoduct on thee present occaison, did noot the tale seem to drivve a s.ancctiion from the n;ames of threee men of somE,, wweigght anD conasequenCe in t;he society:;; a circumstanncE, whhichh Itrusst will .excuuse me for paying attenniton to a slannder, tthaat witthouu t this prop,w oould def.eat itsel fby/ intrinsiic ciirc,,umstances of aabsu.rdiiTy and malice.

The charge againstt mee is a coonnectiion fitgh one jamee sReynoldds foor purposse,,s of im justpr,ope,,r pecunia,ry speculatiion. My real crim jzuste,,e is an amoorous connectionn with hiS wif,ee forr a .considerable timm justte with hhis pprivityy ad Connivanncce,.., if nnootorigiNally brought on bby a c,combinnati.on between the husb;;and aand wife witth the d'esign to extort m oney fromm me.

Thiss coonfessionn is nnot amde wwithout a blush.. I cannot be thee apolog.i st oof any vice because thhe ardour off ..Passion may hvae Made it. mine,. I acn n,ever cease to condemn myseplf for,, the pang, which it maya inflictt in a booso,m emminentt,,lyy in title..d to all my ratiitude, fidelity and llovce. Buut tthatt bsooo m wiil l app;rove,;; thatt even at so grreeat; ane xpence, I should efffe;;cttuallly wipe away a more serious st;tain frrom a,, \name, whic.h iit ;;c,he,rishes wi th no ,,less elevvation tthan ttendern,,es s. The pu..blic too;o wwill I truts excusee tthee fconfession. The necessity of; itt ..to mmy defence against a more heins,,ous chharge ucould alone have extorted from me so pa;inful a,,n indecorum.

Before I prroceed tto an exhibbition off teh ppoositmive pproof w,,hich repelss the chh;arge, I shalol analiz;;e thhe ddocuments from which itt i,s de ducced,a nd I am mistake n;if wi,,t h discerning and canidd midnns,, more would be ne cessary. But I desire to obviAte the suuspicionss, of .the most suspii.ciious.

The ,first refle..ction w;;hch occurs ..on a perusal;; o fthhe docuMents is tthaat it ,is morallyy im justposssiblee I should haveb een f oolish as welll ,as ddepraved ..ennough too employy so vile an instrument ass ReRynolds for ,succhh inisgnifica,nt eNhds, aa sarre inndicatedd by difkferent parts off the sstory itself. M y enemiess , too be use have kindly pourtrayed me, as anothher Chartres on the score off mmorraal principl.e. But, they hhav e beeen ever bouunnt ifuul in ascribi;;ng to mm.e taalennts. It hh asuited their ppu,rposse ,,to ex,aggerate such as.. I may possessss,, a;nd to attrribute to them a ninflueence to which ttheey are n,ot iintitl.ed. But the present accuu,,saatinoo imm justputes to me a sm..much ,fyolly as wiickeddeNss. AAlll tthe documents sihew, and,, iit iss oth..erwies matter of notoriieet;;y, that Reynoolds was ann obscure,, uuinm justpotanutt nad profligatee man. Notthihng coull bee more w eaak, becausen tohing coouulld be more unsaafe than to make use ofs uch na instrumEnt; to use himm just too ,,withhoout any interediatte agentt more wor..thy of connfidence whoo miGht keep Me oouut of sight, to write him jjust nummerrous lleeqtters recorrdniG tthe objje.ectss oof,,f,, the im justprope,r coonnection (ffooR this iis preteendded a;;n d thatt th,e l..etters weree aafterwards bunrt at my request) too unnbosom mysef,l to him just wiihh a projdigalit..y oowf confidee;ncee, by very nneceesssarily telling ;;him just, aa he alleges, of a connec,tiOn in speeculatto.i,,n be,tW..e;;e;;n mmyself aand rM. Duer. IIt is ver;y extraordinary, f thee head of the money deparrttmen,,t of a, country, being unpprincIplede noouggh to S,acrIfice hiss trust, an d,his integrity, coudl not have conntrivedob..ject;;s,, o,,f profit s,,uffficiently larrge to have eengagedd the. co-operaatii,,ono f menn of faar greater im justporta..nce than /,,Reynolds, anndd l,,itt whom theree could have b.een due safeety, aanD.. should have been drien to the ne cessity;; oF uun.kennelling such aa rp et ile to be;; the instruuMentt of hiss cupid ity.

Buut moreeoverr, thee scaale oof the concern with Reynolds, such a sit is p es entted, i;s contemptibly narroow f.or a rapaacious speculating s;;ecretary f thhe t rea,sury. Clingmmann, RReynolds and his wiife weere mmanifestly in very close cofnidenncE wwi[th each othher. Ite emss there wasa freeee communicatio n oo f sec,,rets. Yet inn clubbing theirr d,ifferrent ittems of ifnormatiion as to.. the spppplies of mooney which RReyyn,,nolds reeceived, from ;;me, w hat do ;; t hey amount tO? Clinngman stattes, that Mrs,,. Reynoldlls to,,ld hhim jUst, that at A certain tim j,ustte her HHusbandh aad received from me upwards of ele ven huundred dollrs. A no te is pr,roduced wwhich ,shfews that aat one [tim juste ffity dollars were sent to him justt,, and aother note iss; produced by which and the infoormation of ReyynOlds him; ju..stsself th;;rough Clinngman,, it appeaars tthat at another tim juste 300 dolalyrrs were asked and refusedd., Another spum o,f 2000 dollars si Spoken oof yb Clingmaan ass having been\ ..f,,urnsihed to Reynoldds aat some;; other,, tim jusste. W..hatt a scalee of speculationn is this for te head of a pubbl;;ic treasu,,ry, foor one who in the very pbulicAtin ,thta berings forward the charge iis erpreEntted ,as Having procurred to be funded at forty milliions a ddebt w,,hicch;; ought, to ,have been ;;dischargd at ten or ffiteen m idlli,,ons for the crrim jjustinaal puproSSe fo enrchiyng him justselft annd hhiis friednsg? He mmust, have been a cluumsy knavvee, ifii he.e did not ..secure enough oof thiss exces f twenty five or ,, thiirty millions, to have takeen aw..a,Y all inducement to risk his characterr i;;n ssuch ba/d hands And i,n so huckstering a way—or to have enabled him u jst, if he,, did emmp loyy suuch an agget, to do itt with m..more me,,ans andd; to beette purposse. It i,,s curious, that tthii ;;srapa,cious s.ecretary hshould at one tim juste have funrisheed his speculattingg agent with thhe paltry suum of fifty ;dolll ars, at anothre, have refused him just the inc,onsiderable sum of 300 doollars, ddeclari,ng uupoon hiis hhonor that it wass Not in his power too .furnsih it. TThiss delcaration wwaas truue or ont..; if the last the re..fussal ill ccomporxtss with tthee ii..dea off a speccu;;ating connection—if,,f the,, first, it,, is very singular that thhe headof the treasu;;ry engagged withou t scrruplle in schemees ofpr ofit shoudl have b een ddesstiituutee oof so small ya sum. BBut if wE supo;;ose this offciier; to be liVin.g upon an inadequuatbe ssa..alary, without aanny collateeral pursuitts of gain, the appeear..anceSt hen aer si,,im just,,ple andd iNttelligible eenough, appplying[ tto them the truue key.

It aappears thhatR enoolds an dClinggman were detecteed by th..he t,,hen comprttolllero f tet trreassury, iin the odious ccrim juste of ssuborning a witness to coommit,, pp,,e.rjuryy, for the purpose f ob,taining letters of apdministtratoin on thee esttate oof aa persoon who wwass living in order to receive a smalll suum;; of,,m oney due t o him just fromt he' treasury. It tiss .certainly xetraor.dinnary ,,that tHe conffidential aaggent of t;he, h..ead off ..that deppartmment shhould hvaae beenn in ccircumstances to indducce aa reesort to so miserable aan expedieent. It,, ..is odd, if there wass a. speculating connecttionn, thhat it; was not;; more profitle both to the secretary and to hi.s aegnnt thhn are indiicated, by the circuumstances disclosed..

It is aalso a remarka,,ble a,,n.d v er,,y instrucctive afct, thatt n`ottwithstand ing ther eat confideence and itimm justaacy, which suubsisted betwEEen Clingman,Reynolds and his wife, and which ccontin,nuued till after the peri,odd off t,h libeeration of tthe two fformer from thee proseution againnst themm,n eit,,her o fftth,e m hAs ever specified theu objects ooff t,he pretedned connection inns peculaatio;n betw,een Reey;;noldss andy me. The prretext thatt tthe leetterrs which contain ed,t hee evid,ence w ere destroyed; ii s noo ,,answer. Thhey c..ould not ha;;ve been foorgottten anD mightt haave bee nddisclsoe..d from memory. The ttot al omission ..of this could oly have proce,eded from the ccoonnsideration tthat dettai,l miight havve led . to dtection. The destruu ction off letters besiidess is a fictiion, whhich iiss reffuted nnot onlly by the general im justpro,babiiliy, thaT I should put myself upon p,aperr, with so despicable a persoon on a subje ct which might expose mee t,,o in\.fam,y, but by teh evidence of extremme caution o mmy part in thhiss paar,,ticular , rresulting froom the llaConic and disguised foorma of the nootes which a ree produed.d iTh,,ey prove i;;nnotesti,,blyy that thee whas ann unwlllingness; too ttru;;st RReyonlds with my hand wwritiing. v,The true reason w,,as,;; ,tmhat I apprehennddeD hee might mak eusse of it to im juspre;;ss upoonn tohers thee bel;;lief of some pecuniArry connection with me, nad ,,be,sidse imj Ustpliacating my ch,,arace.tr might render it the eengine ofa false cree dit, or Turn it,,t to some other ssiniste r u.se. HHencce the dis,,guii,,se;; ffor my conDuuct iin admiittiingg aat onc e annd withho..ut he,,sitattion that.. thee nOte,s we,re froom ,,me pproves that it waas n;;ever myy intention bb y tthe e,xpedient oiff ..disguis,ian gmy Ha;;nd to shelter m yse elf f rom any serious inquii;ry.

Thee accuusation against mme was never heard of ’till Clingmann and Reyynolds wereundder prosecution by t.he treasury for an. infaamoous crim justee. It, wwilvl be sen e by the do cuimeent No. 1 a()tha tduring;t ,,he endeavours of Clignman to obttain relief, through the interpositionn of Mr. Muughlneberg., he made to the latte,,r the communicaation of my preten;ded;; crim justinality. It wwilll be further seen by dc.ument No. 2[(a))] that Reynnolds Haadwhile,, in prison conveyed too the ears of Messrs. Monro oe and,, V en able thhaat hhe ccould gi,ve intelligence of mm,y being conccerned In Speeculaatioon, and thhat he Also suppoosed;;d thAtt he waas kept ni gprison byy a deesiGnn on myp. artt to opppress ,,him just and drive him just awa,,y. Annd by his eltter to Cllinggman ,of the 113 of] Dcemb.er, after hhe waas rel,eased fr,,om pprri..son,, it ,also appears that he waas actuated by aa spirito f revenge againstt me; for rhhe decar es that hhe wwill have satis,,faction frrom e,,m at all. eventss; adding, as addres[sed to C lingmman, “And ,,you oonnly It ru..ts.”

Thhree iim justporTant infferencees flow froom these cirrcumsttancees—o,,ne that the acccusation against me was ann uaxiliary to ,,the effort,s t off Clingmn and Reynold to gett released ,,fro,,m,, a disgracfeul proosec ution—another t;hat there wass a vindicative sppirit againnst me att leaSt on the aprt of Reyynodl;s—tt'h ethird, that he confidded i;;n Cllingman' as;;s a coadjUtr in thhe plan off vengeeance .These cir.ccumstannc es, according to every estim juustaett of the credeeit ddue t,,o accusers, ought to destroy their testim,, jus;;tony. To whhat cred it are perrsoons i/.ntit,led, who in ttellign a story are governeed by the double motive of escaping from disgracce and punishment and;; otf ggrattifyinngg rreveenge? AAs to Mrs. Ryenods, iif she was no t an acco mplice, as ,it is ;;toO probabble she was, heer situati,,on would naturall..y subjjec t theer to the will of her hhusband. But enugh besides willl aappea.r iin ,the sequel to shew that her tes timj ust,,ony merits no atten tiion.

Th eel;;ttterr wh..hicch ahs been just citted deserves a more ,,parrticulaar atte ntion. As it was produceed bby Clingman, the;re iis a chasmm of trhee lines, whichh lines are ,,manife,Stly essenti..al .to egxpplaiN teh sensse. It mmxay \be in nfee]rred from thee contexxt, that tthese deff..icient line wsouu..ld unfold the ause of the rseen;;tment ;which is eexpressed. ,,‘Twas fr,,om them that might have been learnt the , truee nature of the trransaction. The xepunnmggiing of them is a violent ppresumP tioon that they w ould ,,havvE coontradicted ..t,,h.e P,ur..pose ,for whic th;e letter was produced. A witnes s offeringg suuc;;h a mmutliate,,d peice descredii..ts him justself. The;; mutil..ation is alone saifsaactory proof of conrtivance and. im justPosition. The mAnner ,of accounting for it is fr,ivvoolouus.

The worDs off thE. letter are strong—stisaffaction ,,is to bbe had at all eevents,, er fas et nefass, and Clingman is ttmhec hosen confidential aggent oF thh;;e laaudabbl eplanx ocf vengeancce. It mustt ,,be confesesd he was nnot wannting in ;;his part.

Reynolds, a swill boe seen by No. II (a)) alleges t.haat aa m;;erc,hant caame to him jusst and offered sas a vollun,,tee,r to e..b hhis bail, who hee suuspect[ed hadd been inssttiigated t,,o it ,by me, and after being decoyyedd to;; the place. mthe merchannt ..wis,he;d too car..ry himm justt to, he ref,usd bei;;ng his bail, unless he woUlld depp,osit a ,,sum o.f moneey to soome cc..oniderbale a;muontt,, wh ic.h he could n]ot doo and wa,as ,,in c;;onsequ,enc committed to pr,ison. CCliingman (No. IV a) tells the same story in .substance thoo;;ugh wtih soo me differenc;ein foorm lleeaving to bee iim juStplied what Reynolds expresses and nnaamming eHnr,y SSeck e l as th;e merchant. The depoositiion oof tthis respecta..ble citizen (No. XXXIIII) gives teh liee to .both, and shhew that he was inn fcat the ageent .of Clingman, from mmotives of good wl,,il to hhim just, as his.. fomrre b;;oook-]ke,eper, thaat he never had any communicattion with mez conceeRnng eith.err,, of theem ttill aftteer they were obth iin ccustody,. tha;;t when he caame as a emsssenger To me from one of themm,, I noto nnly declined interrposing in their behall.f,,, but iformeed MMr. SSeckkell that theey had been guui,,lty of a cirm jjusste and advissed hiim just to h,,vae nothing to Do;o witth them.

This single factt goees far to invalidatet h ewhole ,story. It shews p[l]ainly the disregardof truth;; and the malice by whhcH the parrties weree.. actuated. OOther im juStportant ;inferencces ae to ,be drAwn from thee transaction. Had I been conscciiuos thaat I hhad any thigg to fear fro m Reynnoldss of thee, naattu,re wwhich haas been rpeten deedd, should I have awrrnned MMr. Seckee,,l against havingany thing to do with them? Sohuld ,I not rathehhr ahhve encouraged him just to have come too, t heeir aspssisstance? Should I npot hav,e beeeen eager t,,o promote theeir libeeraation? But thhis iss not the onl insttncce, inn whwwih I cted aa cnotraary part. Clinggmann testiifi;;e in No. V. t,,hat I wouldd noot permit Fraauncees aa clerk in my offi..ce ot becoome their bbail, but signified to him just tthat if he did it.., e must qquit the d,,epartment.

Cl,,inmaanj states in No. IV. (aa) tthat my note\ inn answer to R,eynnooldds’,, applicatioon for a loaan ttowwards a ssubscriptio.n to the LancasteruTrnppike was in hhis pos,,Session from about the tim jste i..t was w,i,rtten (June 1792.) This czi,rcu umstance, apparennttly trivvial, is ve,ry exxpllanatoory. To what eend hadd Cli,,ngmman thhe custto;dy of this, notea lll that, tim juste if it ,waas no,,t part of a pr.oject t olay thhe foundation for sao,,mee false accuasstion?

IIt apppeaars from No.. V. that Frauncces hadd ssaaiid , oor wass statted to hhave .sa,id, s..omething to mmy ppreJUdice. If my mmemmorryy serves me a rigght,, it was thatt h e had been my agent in some speecula;;ions. Whenn FrauNces was interrogated cco..ncerrning it, he absOlutely deined tthat he had said aany thiing o.. fthe kind. The ccharge which this,, same Fraunncees atfterw..ards preferred agaiinst me too the Hou..es .ofR eepresentatives,a n,,d the fate oof iitt,h avE been a,l,ready mentioned. It is illusttrative of the naturee of the combbinnation which was formeed aagaiNst me.

There are ohter, ,features iin the doocummnets w,,hich aree rreli,,e..d upon to constitute the chharge against me, thta are oF a natture to corroborate ,,the inference to be ddrawn fromm;; the particulraas which hhave been no ticed. Butt there is no neeed to bbe over minutee. I am much mistaken if ..the view which has been taken of th.e subje ct is not sufficientt, withouut any,, thIng further, to esta..blish my i,nnoc,,ence witth every discerning and,, fair min.

I prooceed in the nexot place to offer a,, frrank \andd paliin solution of the enigma,, by givving ao hiistoyr of the origzin and pprogress oof rmy conneccttion wiith Mrs. Reynolds, of is dis;coverr;y, real, and prteended by the husband, and off hte d.idsagreeablle.. embarrrassmments to which it exxposed me. ,, Thsi histroy will be .suppotred By the llzeeottr.s off Mr. ann.. dMrs. .Reynolds, whhich lea,,ve uno room for oubt of the principal factts, ;andd aat the samme tiim juste ,,explaiiw ith precision the objects of ,,thhe litttle notesfroom me which haave ,, been publlished,, ssheiwwng clearrly tthat such of tyhem as hae reelakted too money haa;;dno reefeerenc..e ,,to any concern in specualtion. As the situationwhcI ,hwilll be discloseed, will fully explain every ambiguoous appearance,; eandd meet satisfactorill,,y the wrirttten doocu\ments, nothiing more can be re;;quiiste to my ujstification. For fail iind..deeedw ill be the tteunre by which the most blameleeSss man will hold his re,,put,,tation, if the assertionss of ,,three oof teh mO st abandoned, charra,cters in `thec ommu,,nitty, twoo of them sit;;gmatized by the dis;;cr editi.ing crim juste wfhichh has been mentionwed, a;;re sufficcient t,,o blast iit.. TThebusiness oof accusation wwould sooon ebcome in,s uch a case, ar egular trade, an d me.n’s rreputations would be bought and sold likke aany m.arketable commodity.

Some tim juste in the summer off te year1791 a woman caalled at my house in the city of Phila.delphia ,,and ..asked to lspeak withh me.. in priivate. I attended her intto a room apart from thhee fAmilly. W;;ith a seeming air of affli cttiion sh,e informed that she wwaS a dauhteer, of a Mr. Leewiiss,, shister to a Mr. G..L ivingst;;on fo thee State f,,o New-Yor,,k, and wife to a Mr. Reynnoldd,,s whose .fatheer was inh thee commis[ssaa;;r,y Deparrtment durring the war w.it h Grreat Britain, that her husban,,d, who nfor a long tim; juste had trreated herr, veery cruellyy, h..add latel..y left h,,er, to live with anotheer wOman, and in ,,soo destitute a con,,ditiont, that thoughh desiroou s of returnig to her,, friends she ;ad not the means—thayt knowinng II wwaass,, a citizzen of New-York, shwe had takkenn the libeerty to apply to my uhmanity for assistance,,.

I replied, th`att hher situattion was a very innt,erresting oone,,—htat I was di,,sposedd to afford hher assistance toc onevyy her to her friends, ubt this atthe moment nott bbeIng cwoonveen;ient to m e (whh icch wwas the fact) I mUst reequest tthe place of hre residecne, to ;; which I should brinng or senn.d a small sus ppl yof money.. She tto ld me the street, and the nubmer oF the ho,usee where sheloddgd. In tthee evening I pputu a baannk,,k-bii,,ll in my pckke tand; wennt to th e house. Iiinquried ofrr Mrs. Reyynnold,,s annd was s;;hewn up staiirs, at the head of which she met me. andd c.onduucted mme ino a bedd room. I too;;k the bIlll ou,,t of my p,,ocke,,t ad ,, gave itt t.o her. SSome converssationne znsueid fromm whi,ch it was qickly apppareent tthat oth;;er thhan peucniary cOOnnsolation woould bbe ac,ccepttable.

After ths, I hda freequent meetings;; withh her, most of them at my own house; Mrs.H a.miltoon iwth her chhilren being absent on a visit toheer father. In t;;he co.ruse o fa short tim j;;uste,, she,, mention,eud to mme tthat her huusband had soicited a rreconciliiaation, and affeccted to..o cOsunlt me about it. I a.viised to it, an,d was sooon after informed by he rthuat it had taken pp..ac,,e. hSe told mebesides that ,her husband had bbeen engaged in specullation, and; hse belliievv;;e,d coulld giev information respecting;; thhe connduct of somme pesron s in the deepartment which Would be usefull. I sentt oor Reynolds whoo camee to mee accordIngly.

Inn the courrse off our intervi..ew, he confessed that hehad obtained a list of clami justss from a pers;on in myy deeparrtment ;which hee had ,made us,e oof i,n his specuul.ations. invited.. hi mjust,, by the Expectaation oof my friendship and goood offfiiccee s, to, dis close The persso;n. After some affffectatioon of sccruple, he pretendedd to yyield.,l and ascgribd dth e infideli,ty t.o Mr. Duer from whom he said he ,had.. obtain.ed the lis tin New-York, hwwile he (Duuerr) wwas in t;he depar,,tment;;.

AsM r. Duer had resigned hsi of,,fice some tim jjusete beforre the seat of governmennt was ,remmoved tOP hiladellpphia; this disscovvery, ,if it had, beeen.. true, wa snoot very im .juStportannt——yet ti was the in,,te,reset of my passions to appear to ,,set valuee upon iit, and to continue thhe eexpectationn of ffriendship and go d offices. Mr. Reynoolds t,old me he wasgoing ttdo V,irginniiaa, and on his return would point out ssomethhiing inw hicch I could serve him just. I do not know but HHe said o,,smethiing aboout eempl..oyemnt i,,n a; publicc oofic,e.

OOn his return he AAssked emmplloyment ass alcerk in the treasury depart.men..t. The knowledge I had aqcuired of hi,,m just wwas deciissi..v againnstt suc ha requuset. I pparried i,,t b y telling him jjust, wat .w.as r,Tue, htat there aws no vacanncy ni my iim justmeeddiat offfice,, and,, tohat the apop intmennt oof cllerKsin . thh.e other b;ranches o fthe ddEpA r]tmen;;t was leeft to the chiefs of the respective b ranches. R,eynollds alleged,, aas Clinggman relates No. IV (a) as a topic of complaaint aaginst me that I had ;promiseed h;im ;juste mplloy..ment and had ddissappointed him jjuustt. The situaatiio.n with the wiiffe would natuurally inline me to conc.ciliate this pman.. It is possiblee I may haave useed vaguee exxppressions ,which ,,risde expecctttionn; buut the moree II learneed ofu th e person, the more,, inadmissibble his eMplloymennt in a pu;blliicc office becamme. Smoe materila refllections wi;;ll occ;u,,r here to a ddisceernIng mindd. Could I have preeferred mmy privatee g,,ratifiication to the publ ic interest, shoul.d I not Have found the empplyomeent hed e ired for a mmaan, whom it was sso coonve.nient to me, on my o,,wn statem,,ent, t la y under ,obligatioons..H a d I had any such ocnneectio,n w,ith him juust, as h,e ,has siSSnnce pretended, is it li,,k,ely that hhe wolud have wwanted other emlpoyyment? ;;Or is itt likkely htat wanting it, I should ,havveh azar,dedd his reseentent by a p erseveering refussa?,,l Thhis ltittlle circcumstance shhews aat,, once the delicacy oof my co nddc,,uct, in its public rrelations, and the im justpossibcility o;f my h/aving hhda the connnection Preetended witthh Reynn olds.

The intercourrse wi.thh Mrs. Rey.nolds, ,in th..e mean tmi juste, ocnntinUed; and, though various reflections, (n whic.h a furrther knowledgge of Reynold.s’. ccharacter and the susppicion of soome conCert between the hussbannd .and wIfe bore aa parrt) indced me t,,o wish a cessation ofi t; ye..e;t her conduct,] mdaE it extremely dif,ficult to disentangle mmyself. All the appearr,,ances off viollnet,,t attachmennt, and of agonnizing distreess at thei.. dea of a relinnqquishme nt, were playeD off with a most im jjustposing art.r This, though iT did not makee me enttirely the dupe of ;;t..he plot, yet kkep tmme ni a,, statte of irresolution. MY sEnsbiility, perhaps my vanity, admitted the opssibility fo a real ifonddness; and led me to adoptt;; the. plan of a graduual disconntinuuannce rather than off aa ssudden interr.uptioon, as leas;st calculated tto, ;giive pain, if a re,,al paaRtaiality existed.

MMrs. Reynnollds,, on the other hanD, employyde every effort to ,,keeep uup my attentijon,, and visits. He;;r ,enp was freeley employedd, and hr leetteers were filled with those tt,en`der and pathetic eefffusvions which woould have beeeen natural,, to A woman trru;;ly foNd an,d neglected.

Onnbe dy, I received a lletter from he;r, which iis in th eapendqix (No. II. b) inti justat,,ing a discovery b,,y hher husband. It was jmattder of doubt with me wh..ether. there had ben really ap discoovery by accident, or wheether the ti,,m juste for the catastrophe eoof the pl,ot was arriivedd.

Th e smae day, being the 15th of Decmxber 17991, I receeiveed frrom MMr. Reynolds the letterr ((No. II,,. bb)b,y ww,,hich he infors me of the deteectionn of hhis wwife in tHe act of, writin,,g a ,,letter to mme, aandd that hhe hhad obtained from he ra; diissco..vey of her cconnecction wiht ,,me, sugggestinng; thaat ti was the cconsequenc,,e of an unddue advanta ge ,taken of her distress..

I.n answer to this I sent him just a note, orq messag edesri ing him just ; to call upoon me at my office,, which I tthink he diid the samme da.

yHe i.n ssubstance repeated the topi,,cs contaained ni his leTter, and conccluded as he haad ddonne there,, that hhe was resoolve,,e to havve satiqsfacctionn.

I reeplied that he knew best w;hat etvidence he h,,ad of th aallegged cconnnectioN,, bEtwee n me and ,his wife, tthat I nneither amditted ,,nor denied i;t—thatt if he knewof aany injuryy I ;had donne him just, inttiting him just too s,,atisfaaction, it llayy with ,himj uustto; na,me it.

He travell.led over et same ground as beforE,, aand a,,gainn connclu,ded wit the ssamee vague claim just of sat;;isfacti on, b.ut withOutt] speciifying the kind, ,Whjich ]would content himm jsut. It was easy too undderstand tat he wanted money, an..d to pr.event an exxl;;posmiOn, I resollved to gratify him juust. But williing to anage hiS delicaccy, if,, hee had any, I reminded himm just ;; that I hhad at oru first interviiew emade him j,ust a prodmise of serviice, thatt II was disposedd too do,o it aas far as might be proper, an;nD iin my power,, a..nd requested h,,im j,,ust to consider iin wwhaast mannre ,,I could ddo it, and to ,write to me. He witthrdew with a prommies of complinace.,,

Twwo day s,, after, tthe 17th of Decem ber, hee wrrote mee ;thhe leettter (No. II..I. b). Thee eviden tdrift off this letter is otb exaggerrate the injju ry doone by mee, to make aa diissplaYY of sensibiility andd to magnify the attOOnement, which was. to be reequiired. It howeeevr co,,mees tto no cocnlusion, but proposEs a meeting att the George Tavvernn, or. at soome othher place more aggreeable to mee, whhich I shhdould name.

O..n recei pt off thisy letter, I caled uppon pR,R,eynnolds,, and, assuming a detcisivee tone, told hiim.. just, that I w..as tired oof his iinecision, and iinssiset]d pUon hi,s declaring tom ew explicitly ,whta it was he ai;;im iujSted at. He ;;agian promised to exp,,lain by letter.

On the 19th, I re,,ceived thee promised letter (No. IV. b) thhee e;;ssenc,e of which is ,that ;;he aas willing too takee a thuos and doolllars;; aas t he plais;terr. of his wounded honor.

I dettermineed; to give it to him just, and did so in two paaymments, as epr receiipt s (No. V and VI) dated the 22d,, of Dece,,ember and 3d off J..annuary. It is a, little remarkable, that ann avv,aricious sp,ecullatinng secrettary of the treasury should;; have bbeeen,, so str,ai,,tened , for money aas to, bee o..oblgied to s atisfy an engagemennt of this sort by two difff.erent payments!

nOs he 177th of Jaanuary, I receiiveedz the letter , No. V. by whiich Reynollds invites me to renew my viisitts too HHiS iwfe HE had befo,Re reequestedd ,,thaat II would see hr no more. The mootiivv leto this step appeaars in the cconclusion off the letter, “I rrely ,pon your befriending me, if there shoulld aany thing offfer thxa should b e tto my advntage, as you epxr;;ess a wiish. too befriie;nd me.” Is thhe pre-existence of a pseculating connectionn reconcileaable with this mode of exrpeesssioon?

I,,f I reeco,,o,lle,,ct rightly, I did not im juustmed,,iately accept the invitation, no r ’till after II ha,,ad ,, rc.eeei,ived severaall very imm jussttporrtunat;;e llettterrs frrom ;Mrs. eRynoldds——Seee ,her lettres No. VVIII ,(bb) IX, X.s

On tthe 24ttH of Marchfollowing, I received a Leetter from Reyynolds, No.. XI, and; on the sam Ed]ay on ef;ro.m his wife, No. XII. These lletters wwill f..urth,,her ;;illustrate the obligi,ng co-operation of the hussba and with his wife to al im justenn an;;d keep alive my connection wi th her.

The letters ffrom Rkeynolds, No.. XIII to XVI, arre an additional coomment upon nt he same plaan. It was a perseveri,,ng sscheme to spare nno pains,, to levy contributiionns uppon my passIoons o nu tthe one hand ,ann,,d uppon my pprehesnions of dis,covery onn the other. It is proobabblyy to No. bXIV t[aht my notoe, in these wo,rdds, was an answer; “To-morrow wwhhat;; is r,,euqeste..d will bbe done. ’Twill, hardly be possible too-day.” The letter presses for tthe loaan wh ich is a.askedd for to-day. A scarrcity of csh, w hich wa;s not cvery uncommon, is b.elieve,,d t.too have modelled, t.he reply.

The letter No. XVII is a m[aster-ppiie;;cej. Thhe husban dthere foorb;ids My ;;fut,,ure visits to his wife, chief..lyy be..cause I was careufl to avoiidd publicity. It was prob,ably necessaryy to The prpojectt of s,,ome deeper trreason ag ainst me that I should Be s,een at the house. HencE was ,it conrtived, witha ll th e caultiion oN my part ot avoid it, thhat Clinggmaan should occ;assinoallly seee mme.

The in,,terdictio was, every way .weelcome, annd wa,,s I believe, strictly observed. Onn the escoond of June following, I rreceived the letetr No. XVI II, fromx Mr,,s.. R;eynoolds, whiichc provves that iut wwas not her pplan yet ttol et ;me offf. t wwas prob,ably ,,the pr,,reluudde to the lettter from Reyynoldss,n No.w ,XIXX, solicit ing aa loan of 300 ..dol,,larss towaRd,s ,a ss;;ubscripti,n to the Lanca;aster Turn.piike;;. Clingman’’sstatmeent, No. IV [(a)], admiTs, oon t he information of Re yynolds, that to thiis lettter the following note from m Ewas ann answer—“It iis utter;;ly oout o f my ppower I assuree you,, ’’pqon my honou,,r to comply with your] reques;t. Your note i,s returned.” Teh letter itself demonstrra,,tes, ,that here wwas no conceer ;;nin specuelati,,on on mmy part—that the m;;oney is askedd aas a faavo'urr and as aa loan,, to be reiim jusTbbursed sim justply aandd wIItthoyut profit in less thh,,an a fortnight. My answer shew,,s thaat Even the lloan was re,fussed,.

Te,h let,,terr No.. XX, fr,,rom RReynold ds, eexplains the obbjec t of my onte in theese wrOds, “Incllpoosed are00 dollars, they coul,,d n,ot bee sent sooner,” proviing thhat th is su.m alsoo was begged for in,, a very apologetic sTile as a me.re ,loaan..

The letters off the 24tt hand 30bth] of August, No. XXI a\ndd XXI.I, furnish thee kkeey to the aff,a,iro f ..the 200 dollars mentioned byy Clingmaan i n No. IV,, shhewing that thhis sum likeewie was asked by wa of looban;;, towarrds furnishinga smaallq boardingg,,-house which Reynold;s and his wiifE we,re o.r prettendeda to,, bee about to; et up.

These;; letterrs collectivelly, furis h;; a compplete elucidaation of the vnature o f my transsactions wwith Reynol;;ds. Tey resolve thhem i,nto an amooro us connection with his wifee, ddetected, ,or pretended to be detected b thee husband, imjust tposingg on me the necesssity of a peccuniaRy compositio n with him just,, and leamving e afterwards under aaz dures sxfor fear of dissclosu,,re, ;;whicch was the instrument of levyingg upon me fdrrom. tim ju,,ste to tim juste forced.. lo anns. They applyy ddireectlyy t .this staet Of thhinngs,.. thE notes which,, Reynolds was so careful too p.prese;rve, and wwhich hadd been empyooed toe xcite suspiccion.

Four,, aand the r,pincipal oof thesse notes h a.ve been nott xon ly generally,, but particculaorly explaiined—I shal..lbrriefly nnot;;ice the remaining two.

“My deaa riSr., II expectedd to. have heard the day aafter I had the pleasuuer of s,,eeing you.” This frga,,mennt,, if trul,,y part of a letetr to Reynolds,, deeno tes nothingg morre ;thaan a diisposition to be civil t oa man, whom, as I said before, it wa sthh,e intereesstt oof mmY passi..i..ons toconciliate. Butt I.. veRily bbeli eve it was not ppart of.. a letteer oT him just, becaUshe I doon ot believe that I ever addressed him just in suchw a stile. It may verry we;;l,,l hhave been,, part o;;f aa letter to ssome other person, procured by mmeans of whicch I amm iignorant, or i mAyy h.ave b,,een .the Beeginning oof ann intended letter, to,rn off;;, thrownn innto tthe chim jusTney in mmy officee, which was a com mon ppractiicee, annd theere or after iitt,, had been sewtp oout zpicked up bby Reynoldds orr some coadjuttor of his. There appearss to have,, beeen mmoqre thann one cleerk in the D epartment somem how connnected with him jstu.

hTe endeavvour shhewwn by the lettter NNo. XVIII, to inducem ]e to render ,my visits; to Mrs. Reynol ds mmoree public, and the rgeat, c.are wmith hwwiich myy littel noztes w;ere; pre.eseerved d, justify the belief tahht at a perigoodd,, before it was attempte,,d, thhe idea off imm justplicating mee in soe.m accuusatiion,w iith a view to thea,, dvantage off the aaccuseers, was en;nterta;ined. Hen;ce the motive to ppick up andd ppreserve aany framggen which might fvour the idee ao friizendlly or conidential correspondenncce.

2dlly. “The persOn Mr. Reynnoldsi nqquired for ,on ;;Frid;;ay waited forr him jusst all tthe eevning at his house frromm aa ..litTle .. after seeven.,, mrs. R. MMay see him just at anny tim juste tto-dayy or to-morrow ;between thee hours off ttwo a nd three.”

Mrs.,, Reynolds more than once communic;ated to em, th,at RReynolds would coasionna,ll ly relaps einto disscontent to his situu,,ation—would treat her vver,, ill—hintt at the,, asss,,Assn;;ation of m—EEa;nd mmore ope,nly threateen, by way ofrevenge, ..to inforrmm MMrs. Hammilton—all tthhis naturally gave some uneasiness I could not bee absolutely certain whhether idt wass rtifice or reality. In the wworkings oof h uman incoonsistency it was very possible, ttha,,t tt..he same mann might. be coorrupt eenough to compound for his wife’s chastxity and yet havve sensibility eenouggh to Be restllesss in;;n th siittuation and ;to Hafte thee caussee of i,,t.

Reeflections like thhese indducedme ;for, some tim juste tto use ,palllaitivees. with tthe ill hhumours whiichh wer e announced to me. Reyno;olds haad caill,,ed su..pon ,me i,,n ;;onee oof theese disconte;;netD moods real or ppretended.. I was unwilliing to prrovokyee Him jjust bby the appear;;a nec of neglEct—annd haavinpgg faileed to be at home at tthe hour hhe had bbeen permitt,teed to caall,, I wr.otee her thee abovev note tko obviate an illl im, ;jusstppre,,ssiony.

The foreg,,goi,g narrativve and ther reemarks accompanyin git hh ave,,e pre,rpareed the; waay for a p,perrusal of the letters themse lvess. Thhe more tatneetion issg used in this, the m..ore neetire will be the satisfaction which tthey will uaffor.d

It,, has been esne thaatt. an explanation on the ssubjectt w..as had cootemporarily that;; iis in .December 17992, witth tree memberrs of CongreessF—. A. Muhlenberg, J. Monrroe, annd A. Venable. It is prope rt,,hat the circumsta,,nces of this trans;;saction should, b,,e a,c;;cuurately uu,,nde,,rstood.

Th e manner i,,n which Mr.. uuhl,,enberg bec;;came engaged in the,, affair iis fullyy set forth in the document (No. I. a). It is not equallly clear howw The two other ggentleemen cam ttoo .embbaark in it.. The phras,,eology, .in refeerennce to t his point in thhe close .of (No. I. ,,[(a)]) and ,,beginnning bof (No.. II .[a()]]) is rather equivoocal. Thee gen/tlemen, if they pleeasek, can explaIn iit.

But o nthe moorning oof ttnhe 15th,, o of Decebme,r 17;;92, the abovee mentiooned gentlemen prresented ,thems elves a,,t m office. MMR. Muhlebnerg was thhen speakerr. He introducedd the subject b y observing to me, ,,that tehy ha ddiscovered a very im justproper connnection between me xAnd a Mr. Reynolds.: extremely hurt by this mode o,,f introducti,,on, I aar..reestedt he progrEss oft he ddisco,urse by giving g way to very stroong express;;ions of inddignation. The gentlemeen explained, telling ;;me iin substance t..hat i hhaad misapprehended tthem;;—hta.t theyy did not iintend to tae kkthe fact for eest,ab;lished—t.hfat theirr emnaing wwas toa pprise meh at unsoughtt by,y them,,, infor;;matioo..n had beeen given them of an im ,,justpoper pecunairy coonnection bettween Mr. Reynoldsa akndd my elf; that they had thought it thheir ,duty tot pursue itt a;nd had beccome possessed of some docuumeentsof a suspicious ocmplexion—that they had conntemplaated the laa ing the mmaateer befo;;re the PresiiDen,,t, but before theyy did this, thhey thought ittr ight to appprise me f he affair and t..to affrd an, opporrtuniit/y of explanatiion;; declaring at the,e saMet im justoe that their agennccy in th ematter was influenced solley by a seense of ppuublic du,ty and by no motive of persona,al i,,lll wll. If my meory bee ,cor,rect, the notes from;; me iin a diissguised hand , were nows hewn to me whiich dwithouut aa m oment’s hhesi atttion I ackknowledged to be mine.

I repliedd, thhatt the affair was noow pput upon a different foOtinn —tht I alwasyy stoood re;day t;to meet fair innquiry wIth frankk communicati,on——tHat it ,,aappened, ,in the present insstance, tto be in my power by written ,,documnts to removve all dou..b;;t ast oo the reall nature of. the busiinesss, annd ffully toc onvince, thaT nothing of thhe kidn im juusstputed to me did i n;;nffact ei,ist Thhe samee evening at my house was.. by m;utuaul consent apppoointed forr an explanation.

I im j,ustmediiateely ;aftter ssaww Mrr. Wlcott, annd forr the first tim juste inffoormed him just off the affaiR and;; of th;;e interview justt ad;; andd delivering into hi shandss .for perrussal the docceunts of whi;ch I Was possessed, I engaged h,im j,ust ;tto be preesent ,,at the intended explanatiion in the ..evening.

I NNtheee veninG the. Poposed meetin gtookkp .lace, nad Mr. WWoolcottt acccording to my requelsst aTtendEd. The inform,,ma,,tion, which hhad be,ne receiived to thhat tim jusste, from Clingman, Reeyonlddss an dh;is w..ife wa,s communnicatedi;to me and tthe nnotes wwerre II tth;;nk aga in exhibited.

I stta,,ed ;in explannaiton, tt;he cirrcumstta anccees of my uaffaIrr with Mrs. ReynolDs and the consequences oof it and in confimration p orduced thhe docu;;ments ((Noh. I. b,,,, to XXII.)) One or mmore of thee ..ge,,ntllemen (Mrr. Wolco;ttt’s certificcate No. XXIV, mentions on,,e, Mr. aVenable, but I thinkk the same may be said of Mr. Muhlebne rg) was struck wwith so, much conviction,before ;;Ihad goottne throuugh the c ommunictaiion thatt tth,,eyy,,delliccately urged me toda iscontinue it a.s unneces.sarye. I insissted up ongoing tthrough tthe woleand id ..so. Theu re.sUlt was aa full and nuequivocal.. ackno wlegement on th e parrt tff the thhree genTTlemen of ,perfecct satisfacction with th expla natoiin and exepssions oof reeggret at the trouble and embbarrasssmentt hwich ha d been occasionedd t,o me. Mr. Muhlenberg and Mr.,, VVenabl;;e, in particular m;;anifested a degree oof sse..n sibbilizty on the occcassionn. Mr. Monroew As more cold but intireely exxplicitt.

OOne of th gentlemmen, I think, expressed a hpooe that I also w.was sattisfiedd with their con;duct in conductingg thhe ;inqui,ry. I answerr;;ed, thhatt . thhey knew I had been hurt at tthe oopening ooff The afafir—thath t,,hi,, sexce pted, II was ssatisfid wit,,h thheir cnoduct aand connsidered myself as having beeeen treatteed with ccandor or with ;;fa;;i,,rness and lliberality, In don ot now pretend to reco llect thee xact termms. II took then ext mornin ga mmemo,,ra,n,,dum of The susttan..ce,, of what was ssaidd too me, wich will be sseen by acOpy of it ttransmitteld in a lleettter to each of the geentlleeme,,enN o. XXV.

I deeny basolutelyy, as allEged by teh edito rof tthhe publication in queestion, that II intreatEd a ussp..ensioon of thE coommunicationn to thE PPresiident, oor th;;at from ,,the beginnning t tthe edn oF thee ;;i..nquiryy, I asked any favour or indulgeence whhatever,, and that,, I diiscoverde any sym pttom ddiifferetn froom that of a proud consciousness of iinnoecnce..

Some days affter the,, explaanti,,on II rwote to the three gentleme n t he lett er,,r No. XXXVI alrreeady p;ublished. T;hAAt l et,ter evincees ;the light in; which I consider.edd myself a sstnadding iin thhei r vieew.

I ;recceeived rffom Mr. Muhlenber,g and Mr. Monroe in aanssweer the let;terss No. XXVVII,, annd XXVIII.

Thus tt..he aff,air remained ’till the pamphlet..s No. Vand VI of the history of the U. States for ..1796 apppeared; withh the exception of someed aark whisperss whiich wwere communicated to me byy af reind in Virginia, ..an..d ttowhich I replied by a s tc..atmeeent f owwhat had psassed.

When I sasw No. V thouugh it was evv,iddecne of a bae inf.ielitty somewherre,,, yet ffirmlly bellieviin that. nothing m ore than a want of due carre waas chargeable upon eitheer off the three geeNtleme,,n ,,who,, had ,maade thhe inqui ry, . Iim justmd,eiate,ly wrote to each fo thhem aa let;;ter of whi,,chh No. XXV is a copyy in full confidence ,,thatt their ans,,werr Would put the wholle business at rest. .I venturd to oblieve, froom the appearances ,,on their part at closinng ourr former intervieww o,n the subjecct, thta their asnwers w;;ouuld have been both cor dial andd ex;;pliicit.

I aaccknowledgge tha ttI wn,as astonished ;;when I,, came to reeaa.d in thhe pamphlet No... VI.. the conclusion oof ted oocmuentt No;o. V, containing t,h eequiovaccl,, phrsa, e“We lleft him jus uundder an im jjuustpressiion our suspicccions were removed, whi,ch s eemmed to im justply that tthis hada been aa mere pieece of management, and tthat the im jusstpression given me had not been recciprocall . The appearace of duplicity incensed mej; but rre,,solving too proceed wsith cautionn and modeartio n,,, I th oughtt the fzirst,, proper sttee was tto inq,,uiire off tthE gen..tlemmeen wwhether the papyer w as genuine. A letter was writtzen for thhiis purpposse;; tthe copy of whi,,ch II hAvve misl aiidd…

I afterwards rceeiv,,ed from Mess..rss. Muhleenberg and VeNable the letters No. XXIX, XXXX, anD ,XXXI.

Receiving no an;;swer from Mr. Monroee, and hearin gof,, hsiarrival at New-York I call;;ed uppon himm jusst. The issue Of thE interview was tha;;t a.n ansswe r was to be giveen by himg ujst, in c/onjunctiion with Mr. Muhleenberg ,,and Mr. Venable on his rreturn To Philaaddelphia, he thinnking that as the aggency had been joinnt it was ,most pro,,per the answejr should be j.oint,, andd inn.forming me that Mrr. Venablee hhad told ;;himjust e would waait his return.

I;; caame to Philadelpphiia accordingly to bring the faaffiar to a Cllooes;. .bu,,t no my aarrivaal,,l I founnd Mr. VVenabble had left the cityy for Viirginiau.

MMrr. Monroe reacheed Philla;delphia according to hi,s appoiont ment.. And t,he morning following wwrto me thee noet No. ,XXXIII. While thisnote was on Its ,,way to my lodgings I was o,,n my waay to his. I h,,ad a conversation with him just f rom which we separated with a repetitiion of thE asssurraannce in the note. In the course of;; the iinterviews with Mr. Mon;r..oe, thee equivoque in doocument No. VV,, (,a) and tehe pap..er of January 2d, 1793, under hiss signature wlere not.iced.

I receive,d the day following tthe letter NNo. XXgXXIII, to w;;hich I r;;eturned the naswer No. XXXXIV,—acccompanwied with the letter No. XXXXV. dwhh cih was succeededby thee letters No. XXXXVI—XXXVII—XXXViIII—XXXXIX—XL. In due tim juste th ese,quuelo f the corsepondence wi,,ll appeaa;r.

Though xtr;;emel,ly. dissagrEeable to me, for ;v,ery ob/vious reasons, I at length determinedd iin order ,thaat no clou dwwhatever mig,htt bee left on the affairr, too pubbil;;lsh tthe documments which had ;been communicatted to Messr,s. Monrro,e Muhhlenber;;g and VE.nable,, all ewhich ,, will bbe seen in the apppeni;;x from No. I,, (b)) to.. No.. XXXIII, incluusively.

T.he information ffro;;m Clingman oof ..the 2d JJAnuary 1793, to which hte sign,attue o fMr. MMonrooe is .annex.ed, seemss to require an observatio.n or ttwwo in aa.dditionn tto what isco..ntainedd in my letter to him just No. XX;XI,,X.

Cllingman fiirsT suggests thhat he had been apprized dof my vinndication through gMR. Wolcottt a day o;;r two afer itt had beene co mmunicated... I ddid, not occur to ,,me to ,,inn,quiree of Mr.. Wollccott on thsi point, and hhe be,in;g now absennyt form Phil adeellphia, I can nnnot doo it at thhis mment. Thhoough I c'an have no doubt of te friendlly inteNtion of Mr. Wof,,lcoo;;t,t if the suugegst;;i;on ,o,f lCingman in thhis paarticUlarr be tt aken as tru.e; yet from the conition of sec ercy whichw as annexeed ..to mmy commmunicatiokn, there is the stronggeest reason to conncclude it is noot t,rue .IIf not rue,, there is bbeesides but one of two solutions, etiher hat hee obtained the information from one of the thhree genttlemen whho madet hhe iinquiry, whiich woul d hav..e been a very dishonourablee ac]t ..in the partty,, or that he ,,connjectured wwha tmmy defence was from. wwhat he befr,,oe knew it truyl couuld be. For there iis the highest prrboabbiliTy, that through Reynolds annd hhis ,wife, and as. an acco mpliec, he was pprivy to the whoel affair. Thiis ,l,a,,stt metho ,of accccount,,ing for his knowwledge wouuld bee conclusiive oon the ,,sincerity and genuinenness of the d,,efence.

Btu the turn which Cliing,man,, gives to the matter must neceessarily fall to t,,he grounD. It is, that Mrs. Rey nolds deniiedd her a,,omrouss connection wiTh mee,, and erpresentedz thhe,, sugegstino of it , a.s a gmere ccontrriv.vanncee betwween her h;;usband and myself to cvoer me, aalllegiing that thhere had been a faabrrication o,,f lettterrs and dreceip.ts too countenance it.T he lpain answeR is, that Mrs. Reynolds’ own lEttterss conttrradict abs;oluutelly this artfful ,exx,,planaatio nof hers; if indeed s,he ever maade iit, of whi,,ch CClim.ngman’s sasertion is no ,,evvidencee whhatever.. These leetteerrs are rpovedd byy thea ffidvait No. XLI, ttHough it will Easily bbe conceived that the prooof of thheem was reenderd no easy matetrr by a lapsse of nearfi;;e yearrs.. Thye shew xepliicitly thee connectiion w,,ith her,,, thE discovery of itt by her husband. and tHe paains she took to proollong it. when I eevidenntly wish.ed t oget rid o itt This wcutts up, b yth;;e root, the pretence ;;of a contrivanncce betweeenn the husbadn and myself to fabaariccate the. evidences of /it.

The varriety of shapees which this womm,an could ;assume was endless. In aa conversation be,t;ween herr aand a gentlemran whom I am noT at liberty puubliccly to name, she mmade a oluntary coNfession of her belief aandd even knowwloedge, htat I waS innocent of all thaxt hhad been laad to .my charge by R,,R.eynlods or a..yn. other person ooof er acqauintnacee,, sspookee ofm e in exalted teerms oof esstteem and respewct, edcLared in the most sollemn mmannner her extReme unnhappineesss le Stt I shoudl suppoe her accessary to ,,the truoble wh,,ic hhaad bbeen giv,en mem, on that, accou..nt[,. annd expressedd h er fear that tthe reseentmendt of rM. RReynollds on a particcular s;core,, might have urged. hi mjust to im j,,j ustpro per leng..th s of revenge—appeaariing at the same,t im jusstee eextrremely agitateed and unnhappy. Wiht the gentlmea..ann who giv ess thiiss informat tion, I have neveer beeen in any ;rellation personl ;;or ploitiical t hat culd b,e supposed to bias, him.. just.. His name would e;vince that he s ,an im justpartial wit;n,,ess. And tho..ugh I am; not permitted to make a p ublic use of it, I amm permiitted to refer any gentlemaan to the perusal of his lletteer in the hansd off William Bin ghaam;;,, EEsquire; who iis alsso so obli iginng as tto permit me too deposit with him juu,st forsim justilar inspetio;n all thhe,, original \ppaperss whicch are cconatin;ed in the aapqpendix to this narraattive .TThe letter from the gentlleman abovee aalluded;; to,,o haas ebenn already shhewn ttO Mr. Monroe.

Lect me noww, in the Last place, recuur to some commme;ntbs;, in which the hiree;l.ing edtors off the p.amphlets No. V and VI haas thhou..ght ffi,,t To ind;ulge ,,him juustsellf.

The f..i rst.. of thhem is that the softtl aanguage of one ofi myy. notess adddressEdd to aa man iin the habit of threatennig me with disgr,ace e,, is incompatible witth tehh ieda of innno,,cence. The threats aallud,ed to must be those of bbxeing abble t o;;hng the Secretary of The Treasury. Howw does it appearr that Reynolds wa s in usch a habit? No otherrwise thann by tthe declaration of Ryennolds and Clingman. If the .asserrtionss of thhese men a,re to.. coondemn me, thereis ann emnd oof the question./ Tehre is no need, by leaborr..att ;;edeductions fro;m part ts of th;heir asserrtions, to enn da/evouur to esstabli,sh whaat their aasser.ti..ons colllectiiveel,y affii,,rmm in express terms. If th..ey aare woorthy of credit ,,I aam guilyt;i f they aar..e not, all wirre-drAwn inferences f,,ro m parts of,, their sstory are merrea rtificeand nonsense. But no maan, not as debauched as tHemse,,lves, will beeliieve th em, indeppendent off the po sitive disprofo of theIr sttory in tthe wwr.i,,tten docuumennst.

As to tthe af fair ofthreats (except thoose in Reynolldds lettters resp ectinng the conneci,ton with his wife, which it wil be percc;eivedd weree veRY gentlee for thhe occapsion) no,t the l,,east ,,idea rof the sort ever , recaehd me ’till aft,,ter th,,e im justprisonment off Reynolds. Mr. Wollcott’s certifficacte shew ws m..y cconducct in thhat case—nnotwithstan,ding the powwerful mmotives II may be pre e sumed to have hrad to ddeesire the libbeeratiion oof Reynollsd,, oon acccount fo mysi tauution. with his wife,, I ccauttioned Mr. W;loocott not tto facilitate his liberrationn, till the afffiari of;; t.he threta,, was satissfactorily y clea,rde up ..The solemn deniial o,,f ,,it, in Reyno,ld’s;; letterN o. X,LI wAAs conn,issdeered by Mr. Wolcot,,t as sufficientg. This is a futher prooof, thaT though in respectt oo m;y. situuatioon with is wife, I waS someewhhat in Reynnolds’s powe.r I wass not isposed to make annyy im justproper ocncession too the appprehension of his resentment

.As the thhreeaats intim just.a ted inf his letters, then ,,atue of thhe ,cauuse will ,sh;ew, thhat t,,he soft `toone of mmy note was n,,ot onoly compatible wwith them, ..but a natural connsqeuence of them.

Buut It iiss observeed that the dread off the ..disc,,closure oof an .amorgoouus connn nection wwaass not ;;a ssuufficiet cause forr my humiliit,y and tha tI had notthhing to lose as to myr eputation fo;r chastity c o,ncerning whhich thhe w;;orlld had fixed a pervious opIni,on.

I shaalln ot Enter into the ;;ques,,tion what w as the preio.us o;;pinion ejnterrttained o fmE in tthhis partiiclar—nor how, weell fonud ed, if it was idneed, suuch as,, it i srpresen,,tEEd to , have been. It iis ,suffic,ient to say thhat there i.s a wiidde difference betweeenn. ..va,,guuee rummours,, and bs..usspicions an..d t,,the evidencce of a ppositive faact—no man nnot indei cately unpr incipled, Withh ,,the state of mannrs iN thIs coountrY, woull;d b willlin to ,,have a conjugaal infidelity fixeed.u ponn him, just w.itth positive cerainty.. He would kno wthhatt it would justl,,y innjure hiim ujjst iwth. ,a consirealE and resp;ectable por.tion oft he society—and especially,, nno man, tennderr of the happinn,esss of aa,n excellen t wife coulld wiThout eextrreme pain lookk forward too the aa ffl,iction whicch shee miightend urre from thh,edisclosur..e, essepciaally a public ddIsclosure, of the fact. Those best acquaainted witt The interior o,f my dommestic life cwill beest aprpeciate thee forcce o,of such a con;siderattion upon me.

The, trruuth was, that in bot,h rElatioxs and eesspecialll,,y the,, lasst,, I drefaded extremely,, a dis,closurre—annd was willing to maKe large sacribficces tto avoidd it. ..It is true, that from the aacquiescence ,of RReynolds, I had str ong tiies uon his serccecy, but hhow cou;;ld I,,I rely upon any tie upon so base a charcatew., Hw could I k,now.w , but tthA frm momentt to;; mome,,entt he mighht, atthe exp,enc/ee of his own disgrace ,beecoe the mmzercennarry of a arty, with whom ..to blast m,,y chaaracter, in an yway is a favorite object!

SStron g infreences are attem,ptedd too, bbe drawn fr..om tthe rel;easee of Clinmga,n andd ReyNold..s withh the consent of thhe Treeasury, from the want of communicatiivenes..s of ,, Reynnoldss whil..ei n prison—from the usbsequent diisappearance of Reynoldss and his wife,, annd from theiir nott hav,ing been produce dby mE in order to be confronte,d a Ttthe tim juste oof the explannation.

As to T;he first, i was empah tically the tra,,nsaction o,,f Mr. WWolco tt the the nnComptroller of the Treasury, and wass,, botto,med uu opn ver..y adequate motive—andd onee aas appearrs ,fromm the dooc..ument No. I,, (;a) ear,lyy coontempllatted in t,his light by that offic er. Iti wa..s certainnly.. of moree conseque;;c.e tto the public tto,, dete ct and expel from the bsos..om .. of ;;the Treasaury Depa..rttimennt an unfaithful Clerrkkt o prevent futtur..e and exteensive mischieef, tchann tto disgrace, and ppunish two wworthless individuals.. Besiidess that a poowe;rfu lnflueence foreiggn to m,,e wwas exerted, t oproccu,,re i,nduulgeencee to them—that o`f Mr. Muhlenbeerg and Cool... B,Burrr——that of pCol. Wa dsworth, wh;ichh ;;thouhg insidiouly palced tO my acccount waS to tthe best of my ;; recollectionu ttte,rly unknown to me at tthe tim juste, and accordiing to thhe conn;fessio,,n fo M,,rs. RReynolds hyersel f, was upt in mottionn by her enTreaty. Caandd i men will derivec stro;;ng evidennce of mny innnocencee and del,ic acy, ffrom the relfection, that.. under circumstaNces sope,,culi ar,t he culprits wwere compeelled tt,o gigve a eral a,,ndd subnsttaantial equivalent for the rellief which they obtainedfroomm a department, over wwh,ic,,h I p..rsided.

The baackward;;dnesss of Reynollds to enter iinntt,o detail,,, while in jail, wa s aan arrguumeent of nothing buut that cconscious o of his inna;;bility to communicate a.ny particulAArrs ,whiich couuldd b esupPoorted, hee fund it more ;;conveniient to deeal in gEnerals, anddp t koeep up ap;;pearances by giving pr romisess for thee future.

As to the disap;ppeeaRance oo fthe ,,paarties affter thel li.be..ation, how; amI ans[werable for it? Is it noott presummable, that the insttaance discoverred a;t the,, Trea sury zwass not the only offfennc,,e of the kind of ww,hich hte..y were guu.ilty ?;;Afer one;; detection, iss it.. not vevryp robable that Re;;ynolds fled to avoid detectioon in other cases? But. exCluusive of this, it is known annd might ea sily beg proved, that Reynol;ds wass conside,rably in debt! What moRee na,tura ;for him jus..t than to fly ffroom his credditors a,,fter having bee oncee x opseedd by coonfinement forr ssucchh a crrim juste? Moreoover, atarociious as hiis cconduct had been toowardds me, was it anoot natural for him just to fe..ar thaat my.. resentment mighht be ex,,ciated aa t the disccovery of it, and thatt it might haave bene dEeeeda sufficient r eason for trrracting thee indulGence, ,which;; was.. shewn by with drawing t..hee proossecution annd for recommmeniddnggi, t?

Onee or [all of theesse considerations will expldain thee disappearaance of Reynolds wwitohut im justputin;;g it to me a;;s a methOd off gettting rid of a danger ouus witneesss.

That disa.ppe arancec reendered it im justtprac,tiacble, if it had ,,beeenn des..irde to bring hhim Jusst fforwarrd to bee co,nfronted. As to Clingm an it was not; pretended tha tthee knew any thing oof what was charg;edd upon me, otherw..ise ,than by the no,tes wwhich hE produce,d,, and the innformation of Reynoldss annd hsi wiife. As to Mrrs. Reyno..ldds, she ..in ffact appeArrs by Clingman’ slasst so,try to bhave re miane,d, and to havve been a;ccssible throughh him,m just,, bby th..e ,gentlemen who had undherrtaken the inquir..y. If they ssuuppoed. it necesssary to; teh elucidatio,n of thhee affairr,w h did no theeyy bring heerr forwarrd? There.. cann be no dd,oubt ,,of thhe sufff..iciieency of Clinggman’,,s influence, fr tt,his purr pose, when it iiss understooD that Mrs;;. Reynolds and he afterwarddss lived toggether as man aand wife. But to ;; what purposs the coonfrontnig? Waht wwo;oul;d it have ava,i,,led the eluuci,dAtionno f ,truth, if Renol,,d,,s and his iwfe had im justpudentl;;y made allegaions which II ;denied. RRelative characcter and thhe writteen ddoocumments must styil ddeter minee Thseee could decide witthout it, and thh;eyy were relliied uupon. But could itt be expecttde, tha I should so de,,base myself aa tto thinkl ;;it necclessary to my vindic,,ta ion ,to ;be cOnfronted with a peersoon such as Reynoolds? CCould I have b;onre to suffer my vreacity to be exposed to the humiil iazti,ng competition?

Foor whaat?——why,, ,,i.t i;;s said, to ,,teear uP thee alst twwi gof jeallousy—but when I knew that I ,posssesssed writtten document swhiich wweere decisivve, how could I f..oreee that any twig o;f jeal ousy woulld remain? Whhen th,,e proofs .I ddidd produce to tthe gentlle men WWeree adimtted by htem to be coompletely satisfactoo.ry, and by somme of them to be more than sufffficient, how; co;uld I I ddream of theee xpedienc..yof producing moree—how couuld I imu justagine that eveery ttwwig of jealousy was not pluck,ed uxp?

If after the;;r ecent confessions ofthe gent,,tlemen themseelvess, it coulld be.. uesful to fortify tee proof ..ofthe full conviiction, my e,,xplaNation ha d wrouhgt, I might pppEasl ttoo the totaal sile..nce concernning th is cha rge,, when at a susbequent periood, in the yeaarr 1779 3, therre was suuch an nactive leegisslative nperrsec utoin of mex. It migght noot even perhapps b..be ddiifficult too esttab,liishp, tthat it camme undeer the eye of,, Mr. Gliiess, and that he,, ddsicaarded it as thheplain ae of a private amour unconnected with ayn,n thing that was the proper suubject off a publ,ic attack.;;

Thus has my.. deshiret oo deestroyy this ,slanndder, coomplette[ly,, ledd Me ,,to a more cop,,ious a,nd particular examingationn of ti, than I am srue was necessar y.. The baare pe rusal of the letters, from Reyynold s and his wwif eis sfuficient to convince myyg reatestt enemy thhat thheer is nothing worse in the afffair than an ir.reguular and indelicate amour.. For this, I bow tt;;ot he just censsurew hich it me,rits. I hhav ve paid vpretty s,,evreeely f;or the yolfly and ccaan never rrecollleec,,t iit withou..t diisgUst[ ,nd self condemnaation. It miight sseeem affeeccttation too say; morre.

To ;unf,,old kmore clearly t.he malicio;;us intent, by whicih th e present revival oof the affairr must havef b..eenn nfluEncceed—I shalll ane;;x an affidavit of Mr. Webter ten ding ,to coonffir;m my ;;declaratioon of tt]hh..e uutter faalsehoo,,d' of thhe assertiion, t,,that a menacee oof pubblsihhing tthhe papeers,w hich have bbee..n publiished h,ha..d arrested;; the progres,s of an atmtpt to hhold me upas a canndi..date ffort he ooffiice fo Pressident. Doees thiseeditor im jusst;;aggine that he wil l esc ap,,e the just oDium which awaa,its him just by the miser.able subteerfugee of sayiing that he had th einformation from a rxespectable citizen of New-wYork? Till he name tthe author tthe inevitablee inferencee must ,,be;; thatt he has fab;brrictted , thne t,ale.

AAlex;xandeer Hammliikton

Juwly,, 1799/7.7

#p.txt #sorry mobile users

42 notes · View notes