#icons dolores

[tfemcanto]

Happy birthday, Dolores!

[yellowcry]

Dolores says Trans Rights

[toon-tales]

Encanto girlies iconsssss!

[jacarandaaaas]

dolores in this doll outfit!! 🎀

credits to @midcanto who said this outfit was dolores coded! I completely agree so drew her in it with bonus mini dolores in the second outfit! this was super fun to do and I wanna draw more madrigals in outfits so that’s coming up!! dolores ily!!🎀💘

[elvisbooty76]

[chose-de-noir]

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ - ʙᴇᴇᴛʟᴇᴊᴜɪᴄᴇ

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ - ᴡʜᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ғᴜᴄᴋ

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

[toaverse]

Emoji Dolores!

No need to credit for use.

[bungone]

Actually no im not done because I know it gets talked about a lot but Lolita is such an interesting piece of media; not just the book itself but people's attitudes towards it.

like, first off, there's the actual author (nabokov) who goes out of his way to talk about how childish, mokeyish, immature and whatnot Dolores is in the most unnappealing possible ways, and then specifically said that he didnt want the kind of cover that every single fucking published edition of Lolita has?? With girls who are either being sexualized or very obviously having "a good time" which is absolutely not what Dolores was doing in the book?? I really, really, don't think anyone who designs these covers has even opened the first page because what. the. fuck.

It's so obvious that my man Humbert Humbert is an unreliable narrator, but gee, I guess we learned to take everything we read at face value, and also everything that comes from a protagonist's mouth as the "correct" way of viewing things, both in the book and in real life?

And even then, maybe, just MAYBE I can excuse the people who talk about how the book is fucked up because it's "glorifying pedophillia".

Maybe they had a really shitty english teacher. At the very least, they're reading it and understanding that the actions of Humbert Humbert aren't okay? They got to the halfway point. Maybe their education sytem failed them.

Maybe they had a really shitty high school english teacher that never taught them the skills necessary to understand this kind of writing. Maybe they're just dense, that's who they are as a person, and it would take someone going out of their way to point it out for them to consider the possibility.

But then there's the fucking apologists?? Like, putting aside the whole Dolores being 12 (which, yeah, is akin to putting aside the whole book, but bear with me for a second), Humbert Humbert not only kidnaps her (illegal), lies to her for a long time about her mother (not illegal but generally shitty), but is implied to have committed murder (illegal, not sure if implied is the right word here because it absolutely happened and everyone knows it), and sexually abuses Dolores (very illegal). These are crimes. He is a criminal. Say what you want about the justice system these are crimes that absolutely should be crimes.

He's clearly not an upstanding citizen, and I fail to understand how some people look at all his behavior and go "oh yes, the the man who killed a woman and kidnapped a 12 year old girl is just misunderstood, and he did those things for true love" like fuck no.

I like Lolita. It's an objectively good book. The quality of writing (high quality, I mean, I normally hate first-person writing but I actually liked Lolita), it's a great psychological horror piece that doesn't rely on things like shock value and overused tropes. The characters are all multi-dimensional and frankly, act realistically. But that's all it is. A psychological HORROR piece. It's not romantic. If anything, it's meant to make you sympathize with Humbert, and then you're supposed to take a step back and be like, "Wait. Why am I sympathizing with him? I'm not a pedophile." Because yeah, he's a complex character but that only goes to make him realistic in terms of the kind of pedos that exist in real life.

Pedophiles are people too. Mentally ill people, really, really shitty people who need serious help, but reducing them to "not human" only makes them an "other", which makes you forget that on the outside, they look like normal people. That have friends and family and go to school or have jobs and order coffe and read in libraries and yeah, maybe you sat next to one of them an entire year in organic chemistry. They're not weird stalkers that hang out in bushes in parks. Some of them, maybe, but not all. Nowhere near all.

man that derailed fast.

[baby-doll-tears]

[antigonenikk]

none of you understand chrissy cunningham the way i understand her. im making myself the arbiter on all things chrissy. i will decide from now on whether your headcanons are correct.

[motherlove]

Mother Caretaker Dolores Mcdoodle．

Requested by : @warriorsyuri．

Like & Reblog if used．

No Kin ／ ID ／ Me or F／O tags unless requester．

[homosexualslug]

to my many yellowjackets followers who I know support morally dubious women committing cannibalism crimes, please watch The Horrors of Dolores Roach. it's basically modern day Sweeney Todd in Washington Heights with empandas instead of pies.

[toon-tales]

Encanto grandkids!

Idk i just love this style

[arrchhive]

like or reblog. enjoy babies.

[llycaons]

also the reason I'm sticking to dolores is because hh says from the very beginning that lolita is the name he calls her by when he's abusing her and clearly he sees it as the most sexual of her nicknames so I feel very uncomfortable using it even tho it's literally the title. like she has plenty of nicknames (lo, dolly, lolo) so idk why anyone would insist on using that one

[jacarandaaaas]

Ohhh I love magazine spreads for AUs! So cool. I am a 90s kid, and those magazines were everywhere when I was a teenager! Teens read them in class, shared articles, etc all to get the latest about their favorite stars.

ahhh thank you anon!!! 2000s kid here and completely agree🙏 those quizzes they had saying which member are you or who your style icon would be😭 magazines were so iconic! and I think designing a cover would be so fun so ahhhhh!!!