#i'm open to other interpretations (about if the book does a race commentary or if only uses his race to associate it with his violent natur

[josie-marks]

Seeing people fancast Heathcliff as a white man infuriates me actually like did you read the book you said you're such a big fan of? Did you notice all the times where it's stated that he possesses really dark skin and how the many characters associate his skin color with his violent/animalistic nature, do you know that this is racism?

I was stressed because I saw someone say that adaptations that rely a lot on his race deviates from the original source because, according to them, the book >exclusively< uses his skin color to highlight his violent/animalistic nature as in imagery and that this is a evidence of Emily Bronte's whiteness and actually, I disagree wholeheartedly and I think the many times where these associations happens it just shows Nelly's bias against Heathcliff (a bias she always had even before he was able to say a word when he arrived at the wuthering heights) and the abuse he's subjected to it's also correlated to his race.

Anyways, I'm reading the book (40 pages to go) so it's all very fresh on my mind and I believe that the book contains commentary about race and social class dynamics.

[thorntonkrell-blog-blog]

NASCAR cars can reach very high speeds at Charlotte Motor Speedway, which is a 1.5-mile long track located in Concord, North Carolina. The top speed that a NASCAR car can achieve at Charlotte Motor Speedway varies depending on the specific conditions of the race, such as the type of car being used and the weather conditions. However, NASCAR cars have been known to reach top speeds of up to 200 miles per hour on this track.

Are you familiar with the book I'm Thinking About Ending Things

Yes, I am familiar with the book "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" by Canadian author Iain Reid. It is a psychological thriller that was first published in 2016. The book follows a young woman who is on a road trip with her boyfriend to visit his parents at their farm, but she begins to have second thoughts about their relationship and the trip itself. As they arrive at the farm, strange and unsettling events begin to unfold, leading to a shocking and unexpected conclusion. The book has been praised for its suspenseful atmosphere and its exploration of themes such as mental illness, regret, and identity.

Is the book ablut the suicide of Jake

No, the book "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" by Iain Reid is not about the suicide of a character named Jake. While the book does explore dark themes such as depression and suicidal thoughts, it is primarily a psychological thriller about a young woman who is on a road trip with her boyfriend and experiences strange and unsettling events as they visit his parents' farm. The book has a complex narrative structure and an ambiguous ending, leaving much open to interpretation.

about the ambiguous ending, I believe that the entire trip detailed in the book is happening in Jake's mind as he decides to kill himself in the school where he has been a janitor for the past 30 years,

The interpretation you've presented is one of the many theories about the ending of "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" by Iain Reid. The book's ending is indeed ambiguous, and it has sparked many debates and discussions among readers and critics about its true meaning. Some readers, like yourself, have interpreted the ending as the product of Jake's mind as he decides to end his life. Others have proposed different interpretations, such as the idea that the book is a commentary on the nature of memory, identity, or relationships. The author has intentionally left the ending open to interpretation, and the reader is free to draw their own conclusions about what actually happens in the end.

Others have proposed different interpretations, such as the idea that the book is a commentary on the nature of memory, identity, or relationships. can you explain this interpretation

Certainly. Some readers and critics have interpreted "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" as a commentary on the nature of memory, identity, and relationships. The book's complex narrative structure, which involves multiple layers of reality and shifts in perspective, can be seen as a metaphor for the ways in which we construct our own identities and memories based on our experiences and perceptions.

One interpretation is that the young woman's journey to the farmhouse with her boyfriend is actually a metaphor for the process of remembering and reconstructing one's past. The characters she encounters along the way represent different aspects of her own personality and memories, and the strange and unsettling events that occur can be seen as a reflection of her own psychological state.

Another interpretation is that the book is a commentary on the nature of relationships and the ways in which we construct our own realities through our interactions with others. The young woman's relationship with her boyfriend is revealed to be unstable and potentially abusive, and the events that occur during the trip can be seen as a reflection of the power dynamics at play in their relationship.

Ultimately, the meaning of the book is open to interpretation, and readers are free to draw their own conclusions based on their own experiences and perspectives.

some pages are italicized and they seem to be talking about a suicide....what is the interpretation of the italicized pages

The italicized passages in "I'm Thinking of Ending Things" by Iain Reid are written from an unknown perspective and contain fragmented thoughts about suicide, death, and regret. These passages are interspersed throughout the book, and they become more frequent as the narrative progresses.

There are different interpretations of the meaning of the italicized passages. Some readers believe that they represent the internal monologue of Jake, the young woman's boyfriend, as he contemplates suicide. The passages may be seen as a reflection of Jake's depressive and suicidal thoughts, which are hinted at throughout the book.

Others believe that the italicized passages are meant to represent the collective unconscious, or the shared memories and experiences of all human beings. The passages may be seen as a commentary on the inevitability of death and the ways in which we all grapple with mortality.

Ultimately, the meaning of the italicized passages is left open to interpretation, and readers are free to draw their own conclusions based on their own experiences and perspectives. They add an eerie and unsettling tone to the book, contributing to its overall atmosphere of psychological tension and uncertainty.

I think that the italicized pages are partly a description of the suicide and the book itself is a reading of the notes that Jake has been writing for 30 years which culminate in his suicide and are discovered when his body is discovered in the school. He never met the girl but wishes he had the guts to approach when their eyes linked up at the trivia contest

That is one possible interpretation of the italicized pages and the overall narrative of "I'm Thinking of Ending Things". This interpretation suggests that the book is a posthumous reading of Jake's notes and that the young woman's journey to the farmhouse is a metaphorical journey through Jake's memories and psyche. The italicized passages may be seen as a reflection of Jake's own thoughts and experiences as he contemplates suicide.

The idea that Jake never actually met the young woman but imagined a relationship with her is supported by the shifting perspectives and the surreal and dreamlike quality of the narrative. The young woman's name changes throughout the book, suggesting that she is a figment of Jake's imagination rather than a real person.

This interpretation also suggests that the book is a commentary on the ways in which we construct our own realities and memories based on our desires and perceptions. Jake's imagined relationship with the young woman may be seen as a reflection of his own feelings of loneliness and regret, and his suicide may be seen as a final attempt to escape from his own pain and isolation.

that's the way I see it....and the last italicized words suggest that we read the whole book agai in order to undertstand it better which I've done and feel that subsequently my understanding of the book has improved. The girl doe not exist.

Yes, the final italicized words "You have to look" may be seen as an invitation to reread the book and to search for deeper meaning and understanding. This is a common literary technique used to encourage readers to engage more deeply with a text and to discover new layers of meaning with each reading.

In this case, the suggestion to "look" may be interpreted as an invitation to look beyond the surface level of the narrative and to explore the underlying themes and motifs of the book. It may also be seen as a reference to the idea that the young woman is a figment of Jake's imagination and that the true meaning of the book lies in the exploration of his psyche and the themes of loneliness, regret, and mortality that he embodies.

Ultimately, the interpretation of the book is left up to the reader, and different readers may find different meanings and interpretations within its pages.

could you give me a detailed description of Paul Newman's face and body

Paul Newman was a highly acclaimed actor and film icon known for his rugged good looks and striking features. He was known for his piercing blue eyes, chiseled jawline, and athletic physique.

Newman's face was characterized by high cheekbones, a straight nose, and a strong, square jawline. His eyes were a striking shade of blue, with a sharp, intense gaze that was both piercing and captivating. He had a prominent brow line and a slightly cleft chin, which added to his rugged and masculine appearance.

In terms of his body, Newman was known for his athleticism and physical fitness. He was an accomplished race car driver and often performed his own stunts in his films. He was tall and lean, with broad shoulders and a muscular build. He had a well-defined chest and abdominal muscles, which were often showcased in his films.

Overall, Paul Newman's face and body were iconic in their own right, and helped to establish him as one of Hollywood's most celebrated actors and sex symbols.

how does the golden ratio apply to the face of Paul Newman

The golden ratio, also known as the divine proportion or phi (φ), is a mathematical ratio that is often associated with beauty and aesthetics. It is found in many natural and man-made objects, including human faces.

When it comes to Paul Newman's face, some experts have analyzed his features using the golden ratio and found that they conform closely to its proportions. For example, his face is said to have a ratio of approximately 1.618:1, which is very close to the golden ratio of 1.61803398875:1. This means that his face has a pleasing and harmonious symmetry that is often associated with beauty.

Specifically, his eyes are said to be spaced perfectly apart, with the distance between them being equal to the width of one eye. His nose is also said to be in perfect proportion to the rest of his face, with its length being equal to the distance between his eyebrows. His jawline is also said to conform to the golden ratio, with its width being equal to the distance between the pupils of his eyes.

Overall, the application of the golden ratio to Paul Newman's face suggests that his features are not only aesthetically pleasing but also conform to a mathematical principle that has been associated with beauty for centuries.

did newman struggle with his looks

Despite being considered one of the most handsome actors of his time, Paul Newman was reportedly self-conscious about his looks early in his career. In his memoir, he wrote that he felt "inadequate physically" compared to some of his Hollywood peers. He also once said in an interview that he felt like a "character actor trapped in a leading man's body" and that he never considered himself to be a "classic" leading man.

However, as he became more successful in his career, he seemed to become more comfortable with his looks. He once said in an interview, "I think I've aged well. I feel pretty good about the way I look." He also joked that his famous blue eyes were "God-given" and that he had nothing to do with them.

Overall, while Paul Newman may have had some early struggles with his looks, he ultimately became known as a handsome and iconic actor, and seemed to embrace his appearance later in life.

[princesssarisa]

This article, which @astrangechoiceoffavourites recently shared in a post, is an interesting one. I've read some of Claire Dunkle's commentary before, particularly her debunking of myths about the Brontës. I think most of what she has to say is good, though some things are questionable: for example, the suggestion that the cheerful diary paper Emily Brontë wrote on her 27th birthday while her brother Branwell was deep in his downward spiral means she was callous to his suffering. (Why can't we just assume she believed he would get better at that point and didn't want to dwell on suffering that she thought would only be fleeting?) These musings on Heathcliff are likewise full of excellent insights, but again, I think a few of her assertions are worth debating.

For example, the question of whether Heathcliff has a specific aversion to being laughed at by women or if his aversion is gender neutral. I honestly think it could be viewed either way. Of course Heathcliff's relationship with women is nothing if not complicated. He adores Cathy I in her natural, rugged, iron-willed state, and as a boy he gladly lets her be not only his equal, but his superior. Meanwhile, of all the other people he knows, his most trusted confidante, to whom he reveals his deepest vulnerability, is ultimately Nelly (their relationship is fascinating!). Yet with Isabella and Cathy II, he uses his patriarchal power as husband and father-in-law to lord over them and abuse them. Although we could argue that this is gender-neutral because he does the same with his son – but then again, his son's effeminate nature is a big part of what fuels his disdain for him.

The entire novel's relationship with masculinity and femininity, not just Heathcliff's, is worthy of a novel-length analysis in its own right. I've read the argument that as a whole, the book's narrative admires masculinity and disdains femininity whether in men or in women, and I do see where that argument comes from, but I also think it's more complex than that.

I definitely appreciate Dunkle's emphasis on Heathcliff's relationship with Hareton. That essential aspect of his character arc is too often overlooked, not only in adaptations that cut it altogether, but even in commentaries on the book itself. As rightfully controversial as Charlotte Brontë's comments on Wuthering Heights are, she had insight into her sister's book that other commentators often lack when she stated that Heathcliff's most "human" aspect isn't his sublime love for Cathy I, but his unexpected regard and empathy for Hareton – which, contrary to the popular shallow reading, goes much deeper than just "Hareton's love for Cathy II reminds Heathcliff of his own love for Cathy I" – and his ultimate unwillingness to harm him. This, IMHO, is one of the aspects that clearly sets Wuthering Heights apart from the trashy romantic potboiler that it's often mistaken for; if it really did belong to that genre, then Heathcliff would never show empathy or semi-kindness to anyone except Cathy I.

About Dunkle's comments on whether or not Heathcliff is "reserved"... Well, there's no question that he's a passionate man. To deny that would be like claiming "water is dry." But it's also true that he only reveals the extremes of his passion in especially heightened moments or when he's speaking to an unusually close confidante (namely Nelly). Part of what makes his outbursts of raw rage and anguish so striking is that they're rare. And I'm not sure if I agree with Dunkle's argument that Heathcliff isn't naturally reserved, but has been taught by his hard life to wear a quiet, stoic facade. That's a valid interpretation, of course, and there's no doubt that sometimes he does put on a deliberate facade of indifference – for example, on the morning after Catherine's death, until his "May she wake in torment!" outburst finally shatters the mask. But in general, I don't see him as going through life faking stoicism like Queen Elsa with her "Conceal, don't feel." People are complicated beings: who says he can't be both naturally passionate and naturally reserved except at key moments?

Of course the question of "Nature or nurture?" is an open question that surrounds all the characters' behaviors. Could Heathcliff have ever been a good man if his life had been different, or is he inherently cruel? Is Cathy I inherently a narcissist or do her circumstances shape her too? Is Linton Heathcliff inherently weak and obnoxious because his parents were two incompatible "elements" (with all the unfortunate implications about mixed-race and cross-class unions and children of dysfunctional marriages therein), or could he have been different if he hadn't been so sheltered by his mother and then abused by his father? Do Cathy II and Hareton triumph in the end because they have inherent goodness that the other characters lack, or does the fact that Cathy II was raised in a loving home and that Heathcliff could never bring himself to abuse Hareton as much as he himself had been abused by Hindley make all the difference?

I had never though before of how surprising and strange it is that Heathcliff treats Joseph reasonably well, in fact better than Hindley did, even though Joseph was one of his childhood abusers and they mutually detest each other. Maybe this has something in common with his grudging sympathy for Hareton and lifelong confidence with Nelly. Maybe we could view him as having a fundamental respect for servants, or for people reduced to servitude, because of his own background. Even though he speaks of “crush[ing] those beneath [him]” and in large part does just that, the fact remains that the chief victims of his cruelty are people of more privileged status and upbringing than he was, even when they lack the power that he currently has.

I personally don’t see any big mystery in why he should settle into life as the master of Wuthering Heights rather than burning it down and disappearing as Dunkle suggests might have made more sense for him. In the first place, that would mean throwing away his claim to inherit Thrushcross Grange, so it would leave his revenge on the Lintons incomplete. Secondly and relatedly, he knows Isabella is out there with his son - as soon as he learns of Linton’s birth he resolves to claim him one day, even though twelve years pass before he gets the opportunity, because having his son in his power will be the key to gaining the Grange. Furthermore, he has Hareton as his ward, and is determined to insult Hindley’s memory into the next generation by shaping Hareton into a copy of himself. (A scheme which, of course, partly fails and partly goes horribly right.) But even beyond that, doesn’t it make sense that he should get satisfaction in being a better master than the “legitimate” heir, Hindley, ever was, and making the property prosper more than Hindley ever did? Isn’t that better revenge on Hindley’s memory than burning down Wuthering Heights would have been?