#i suppose this is discourse in a way?

[fromtheseventhhell]

I love how people are only ever interested in defending Arya's right to be weird-looking. It's never defending her intelligence from people who claim she's incapable of thinking for herself, highlighting her importance to the plot and refusing to see her as just a prop, acknowledging how much of her story gets stolen and given to other characters, talking about her trauma or how often it gets erased and overlooked, seeing her as more than just an attack dog/bodyguard, etc. Nope. It's just a "why can't people let Arya be ugly/unconventional looking? :(" post every other week because people are, for whatever reason, obsessed with how Arya is visually perceived. One of the most misinterpreted characters yet the issue is only ever with her being portrayed as "too pretty" or the wrong "type" of pretty. This fandom will entirely rewrite a character's motivations, values, and role in the story to the point that they consider references to canon "hate" but! The true injustice to canon is we acknowledge that she is described as pretty several times. Arya simply existing as her pretty, important, and non-conforming self is too complex and confusing for people to comprehend 😔.

[milkywayes]

this might be controversial but i actually think it’s more interesting and perhaps even more in the spirit of the narrative if we don’t make garrus’ dad out to be some super swell guy who was right all along and whose only mistake was getting saddled with a headstrong child who couldn’t see reason. actually. it’s also funnier imo if the relationship is more than one-sidedly dysfunctional

[statementlou]

Tbh i am not surprised that a person who openly talked about having drinking problems since 1d days, because of how crazy 1d worked has been agressive. What surprises me is people being surprised (they never seriously saw drunk person?). But i am also confused about this whole book. Apparently Maya said that that book is not fully bout Liam but compilation about her exes and some of the worst parts are not about him. But recently she said that the book is “ofc about him” so what is true then? Or did she meant it that ofc some parts are about him or that whole book is about him?

Sorry, just confused

I also am not surprised- we've learned so much more about the real stories of things and about the guys' actual lives over the last years, and the story that has unfolded around Liam has been totally consistent throughout if you've been following it, and so the information Maya is telling us is shocking and upsetting but not difficult to believe. I got an anon yesterday saying they were worried about getting similar revelations about the other boys, like "if Liam could be doing this we just don't know, any of them could", and while in a way that's always true I guess, anyone could be doing anything in private like... that doesn't really concern me. Because none of these Liam revelations are coming out of nowhere, there have been many MANY steps along the way leading us here if you've been watching, and he has talked openly about both his mental health struggles and his addiction issues. So to answer that anon... to find out something similar about Louis would in contrast contradict everything we know about him and no I'm not worried about it. Is he an abuser or a loose cannon, well that news would truly shock me to my core, I will be honest. But anyway as for the book I don't find it strange that she was nervous when it came out and treading lightly and later decided, fuck it. In the absolutely on point tiktok she dropped today (YES👏GIRL👏FUCKING TELL THEM👏) she even mentions attempts to keep her from publishing the book, presumably by Liam's team, that I am riveted by and cannot WAIT to hear more details about actually- like I said I don't find it at all strange that she was nervous and downplayed it a bit then. But if she says now that it's just about Liam, well, I would say it's been clear from the beginning that the book is their story. Maya herself brought up the parallel of songs being written about stuff and I think it's the same thing; it's true (she was in an abusive relationship that involved certain kinds of events) but maybe not 100% literal (I'm sure details were changed to make the story work, it's not like a word for word timeline of their interactions or whatever).

[mabaris]

“men are always willing to believe two things about a woman: one, that she is weak, and two, that she finds him attractive.”

truly insane to have a character say this and then make them actually attracted to men in any capacity. btw.

[starryoak]

Making memes out of my headcanons, part 3, swinging bats at hornets nests edition!

[thirdeyeblue]

“Nine would have treated Martha better than Ten did”

I need to talk about this argument that never seems to stop circulating.

Note: Not a venomous/anti post. There’s more than enough of that across fandom spaces as is, and this is supposed to be a place for ✨sweet, blissful escapism✨

When making this argument, people seem to envision a scenario in which Nine never met Rose.

While I can appreciate a good hypothetical, recognizing Rose's significance to the Doctor (Nine and Ten) is essential to understanding why things with Martha played out the way they did in the first place.

In the third series, the Doctor is grieving. This grief is deliberately threaded into nearly every script, whether spoken aloud or not (and these are just a few examples):

He's burning in Rose’s wake the entire time Martha travels with him, which is why it’s so frequently called upon: It’s 100% deliberate in framing his grief. He grieved as Nine too, of course— having been fresh on the heels of the Time War — but then he met Rose, which changed everything.

Back then, he was still a rude, traumatized pain in the ass, but we watch Rose soften more of those jagged edges with every episode as they grow closer; as he lets his guard down and forms a deep connection with her.

He falls in love (against his better judgment) and it's game over.

And yes: provided S1E1 had been titled 'Martha', one can realistically assume things might have unfolded similarly to how they did with Rose. However, it wouldn’t have been that way just because the Doctor was Nine and “Nine was different” — it would be because he wasn’t already in love with someone else. The same can't be said for the start of S3.

Think of it like this: if Rose AND Martha had been in that cellar — if Nine had taken both of them along with him in S1 — we’d eventually be looking at the most melodramatic love triangle ever, what with him living in close quarters with two brilliant, gorgeous, compassionate young women... But Doctor Who is plenty “soap opera” as is with just one woman in the TARDIS.

(I certainly wouldn’t object to reading that fic, though)

Now, regarding the unrequited elephant in the room…

His inability to be romantic with Martha isn’t because he thinks her lesser, nor is it for lack of compatibility. It isn't because Rose is any better than her. It certainly isn’t just because he’s Ten.

It’s really only for one reason, which can't be denied — and now I’m a broken record:

He is still in love with Rose.

(cut from a tenrosedaily gif)

Nine is Ten, and Ten is only such a mess in S3 because he’s just lost the love of his life. Martha merely got caught in the crosshairs of a volatile Time Lord in mourning, and yes — it sucks. Absolutely.

But it also feels dismissive to chalk Ten and Martha’s relationship up to little more than some sort of mindless dance of pining, jealousy, and toxicity.

Ten trusted Martha with his life over and over again — and hers, with him. He constantly praised her brilliance, happily carting her around time and space with no intention of letting her go. In the BBC’s extended universe of novels/comics/cartoons/etc, there’s so much depth to their relationship: love and trust and trauma and sacrifice. They had their own special bond as mates, their own complexities — so it’s a bummer that it's forever overshadowed by the other things.

I’m not denying that there was a lot of stuff that sucked/was for sure toxic about Ten's S3 behavior, but so many of the things I've seen him catching flak for can be directly attributed to being A Clueless Fucking Alien Idiot (not a trait that’s unique to Ten) — as well as his flat-out obliviousness to Martha’s feelings.

So yes, I agree: if Rose never existed, he would have treated Martha differently as Nine. He also would have treated her differently as Ten. Certainly.

But Rose did exist, and when discussing canon, it matters.

“He tells me that he absolutely, 100% loves Rose... He tells me how my daughter; my wonderful, beautiful, clever little girl saved him from himself before… And he says that’s all because of me! I made her into the Rose Tyler that saved him.”

-Jackie Tyler, Flight Into Hull!

Martha got the short end of the stick in S3. She came round at the wrong place and time, but that doesn't mean it was all bad. It doesn't mean the Doctor didn’t adore her. It certainly doesn't mean the time they spent together was wasted or worthless. They were brilliant!

Sure, he could be a twat, but let it be known that he was a twat with Rose as well, both as Nine and Ten. I’m sure Tentoo can be plenty infuriating, too. So while I'll defend Ten (and Tentoo) into the ground forever and ever and ever, I'll concede that he's fucked up.

The Doctor is a certified Pain In The Ass. It’s one of the things I love so much about this character — dynamics.

But never forget that Martha was goddamn tough as nails and overcame every bit of it. She moved on with her life, and the Doctor moved on with his. One can only pray that, when they inevitably drag her back onto the show (which feels inevitable if I'm honest), we see at once that she's been living her best life for all these years.

[dimsilver]

conservatives who think posting a photo of a model-looking conservative woman next to a photo of a normal-looking or overweight or blue-haired liberal woman constitutes a slam-dunk ideological argument: I am Biting you

[strandnreyes]

also with Grace’s absence, are we assuming that she’s not in contact with anyone other than Judd? because HER BEST FRIEND HAS CANCER! get her off that ship!!

[chemtrailactivist]

since mikailas art is a hot topic now I don’t think we should ever forget this

IMAGINE DRAWING YOUR WIFES SISTER AND RAPE SURVIVOR AS THAT CHICK FROM THE INCEST GAME

FUCK EVEN IF WE TAKE LILYS SIDE OF THE STORY IMAGINE DRAWING YOUR WIFES RAPIST AS THAT CHICK FROM THE INSEST GAME IN THE THUMBNAIL OF A VIDEO DEFENDING HER, WHAT

[laura1633]

.

[aprilblossomgirl]

# mood 1 + mood 2 (basically)

[mxrtified777]

the mxrtified777 situation is crazy

(ridiculous discourse below!)

You want me to Take responsibility for the satirical, suggestive art I drew over 2 years ago upon request? Sure thing. My side profiles looked like shit back then and I don’t even want to look back at the dialogue I wrote for them at the time. What I will seriously say on the matter is that some of you are misinterpreting the intent behind that piece. Obviously if anything of any suggestive caliber makes you cringe, then you aren’t going to care about intent. That’s fine. You get to block the tag, block me, whatever, to curate your own online experience. What you don’t get to do is create a moral problem out of it when you dislike or feel discomfort with the topic being displayed. To circle back to intent, That piece was created to get a laugh out of people who enjoy the inherently ridiculous dynamic behind Nevaac. Obviously what makes you laugh is subjective, but whether or not you personally found it funny doesn’t erase the fact that I created it to be that way. Had I intended it to be purely suggestive, I wouldn’t have gone out of my way to censor part of the request (something also done to be funny), or pose them in a way that prioritized their expressions rather than their bodies, or dressed Isaac in weed pajama pants. I won't shy away from the fact that I've created artwork with the intention of creating suggestive fan-service. When I was younger, I had a huge fictional crush on that deranged emo kid. I would not say the same now despite him being one of my favorite characters of all time; I have outgrown him in that regard. I would not draw those same pieces today; hell, I wouldn’t draw the “”Infamous Monopoly Drawing”” today. I admit to being younger and more naïve when I drew that piece; however, I also will mention that I was within an appropriate age range for that behavior to not be objectively creepy at the time of drawing that. If you still believe the artwork I’ve created to be a serious problem in need of fandom-wide exposure, then I encourage you to reorient yourself with some current events to remind yourself what the majority of the population considers to be real problems. Regardless of the piece, I do try my best to tag possibly concerning content so that people who want a fun, carefree fandom experience don’t have to see it. If you think I’ve missed some tags, don’t be scared to tell me.

Continuing off of that, I advertise myself as a weirdo all of the time; not the kind of weirdo I’ve been insinuated to be, but someone who creates and enjoys strange (and occasionally disturbing) things nonetheless. It's plastered fucking everywhere on my blog. The ‘16+’ warning is there for a reason. The labeling on the packaging doesn’t exist to be ignored. Block the tags I encourage you to block in my pinned post if you don’t want my stuff in the fandom tags, or block me directly, which I have also encouraged people to do.

It truly feels as though some of you are forgetting that the people on the other side of your screen are just that; people. I am a real person. The IBVS fandom is made up of real people. Flipping this coin over, the characters in IBVS are not real people. Edward Quinton does not get upset when Edwix fanart gets published in the tag. You want to know who does actually get upset? Every real fandom member that scrolls through the tag looking for new fanart or theories where they instead end up finding people repeatedly making “callout posts” about shit hardly anyone even cares to remember. At this point, those posts are polluting the tag with its played-out drama more than I ever have with my artwork. Listen to me when I tell you this: go re-read the story. Go think of ridiculous and outlandish theories. Go make an unreasonable amount of fanart for your favorite jock with only 13 total lines. Go make OCs and AUs with your friends. Enjoy IBVS for what it is and stop making yourself and others miserable by obsessing over stuff a rando did on the internet. Go have a good time.

TL;DR: If you’re mad at me for literally whatever reason, go throw a fit about it in the privacy of your own blog outside of the fandom tags where you will upset uninvolved people. You are allowed to hate me. You are allowed to think whatever you want about me. What I believe you should not be allowed to do is to turn this already small fandom full of genuinely kind and creative people into a warzone, or at the very least a less-than-hospitable fan-space, that discourages artists, writers, and other fans from enjoying the story.

[gremnda]

i haven't checked the lstwt since kaboodle left. i open up twt and oh that's a clip of derapchu calling his fans replacable. I close twitter.

[spop-romanticizes-abuse]

entrapta reminds me of those anime girls who look like they're twelve but are actually a hundred thousand years old or something.

[butwhatifidothis]

Genuinely can't understand how people can legitimately say "trying to argue that Crests are powerful and useful and writing Crests as being powerful and useful proves Edelgard right about how people wrongfully fixate on them" when Edelgard herself says she thinks she can only use her signature heavy armor because of Crests (study requests), and when she herself uses a Relic that was made specifically to be compatible with her twin Crests to use in fighting. Nearly her entire visual language as a character relies on her using her Crests, so the people trying to argue this just kinda point out how hypocritical she is lmao

[sparring-spirals]

me in tags of posts i am reblogging with no context: haha delilah being ominous? sure. go for it

me, glancing at other posts in the CR tag immediately after that reblog: OH. OH SO LAUDNA DID GO FOR IT. IT BEING. ORYM.