#i really like the implication classic ate angel island
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
thefakehedgehogaroundhere · 3 months ago
Text
i don't like amy's rewritten lines in sxshg and i'm not even a sonamy fan. it's because generations is an existing game, and removing the crush on sonic is a step backwards for her character development. in the future im fine with her toning down the crush! i'd encourage it, i'd be happy for her to have made that realization.
but in removing it from a past game, we're led to believe she either never had the crush OR that she'd had that development offscreen already. and neither of these are things you should do with your character development. if they want amy to move on, do it in the comics! do it in a future game! fucking show it!!! don't just lie to us and say she'd already grown past it by generations which she very much did not, and don't try to say she'd never had it, which again, she very much did not!!
because robbing amy of a major part of her character at the time just feels so. wrong. you know how a story can't progress without conflict? something has to happen to make change. and saying amy never had a crush, or removing scenes showing them, is erasing what had to happen in order for her to grow as a character.
idk. like i said it's fine if they want her to grow, but you can't do that during a game from 11 years ago and try to keep it in the same point in the canon timeline. because has she even grown if she didn't have anything to grow from?
46 notes · View notes
cursed-sonic-opinions · 3 months ago
Text
i want to put this here since we've discussed amy a bit on this blog. i don't think it's "censorship" and again i don't think it's a bad thing to change. but how can she grow if there wasn't any "problem?"
i don't like amy's rewritten lines in sxshg and i'm not even a sonamy fan. it's because generations is an existing game, and removing the crush on sonic is a step backwards for her character development. in the future im fine with her toning down the crush! i'd encourage it, i'd be happy for her to have made that realization.
but in removing it from a past game, we're led to believe she either never had the crush OR that she'd had that development offscreen already. and neither of these are things you should do with your character development. if they want amy to move on, do it in the comics! do it in a future game! fucking show it!!! don't just lie to us and say she'd already grown past it by generations which she very much did not, and don't try to say she'd never had it, which again, she very much did not!!
because robbing amy of a major part of her character at the time just feels so. wrong. you know how a story can't progress without conflict? something has to happen to make change. and saying amy never had a crush, or removing scenes showing them, is erasing what had to happen in order for her to grow as a character.
idk. like i said it's fine if they want her to grow, but you can't do that during a game from 11 years ago and try to keep it in the same point in the canon timeline. because has she even grown if she didn't have anything to grow from?
46 notes · View notes