#ginger and whinger

[donttempttme-blog]

It really pisses me off that all these talking heads are saying hasnoballs is going to have to pay MILLIONS if he loses his court case against MGN newspaper group. 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ It's already been reported that the TAXPAYER has PAID HIS side of this case thus far.🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️ WTAF ‼️‼️‼️

[solitairemeb-blog]

Disappointing to hear the British court hearing the phone hacking scandal has let scooby doo's [Omid Scobie] perjury go unchecked ATM. I'm hoping the judge has just let it pass for now 🤷‍♀️ . Scooby has stated on oath that he doesn't know hazbeen personally. Yet he has written in the forward to FINDING FREEDOM that the book was written after hundreds of hours of personally consulting with hazbeen and MEgain. So outright fucking lying.

[jake-a-day]

Day 64:

Guess who got to see their boy today!

[celticcrossanon]

Put this under hilarious but pathetic online gossip, Celta. Twitter/x rumors say the reason Ginger & Whinger left the ESPY award show early is because their 6-man security detail gets paid by the hour and the security guards had another engagement to go to and Ginger and Whinger weren't going to pay for a second hour of a large security detail. I think they left because Harry wanted to leave, not that they couldn't afford to pay for security to stay a second hour at a televised award show.

Hi Nonny,

If Harry and Meghan left early because their paid security was going to another job, that is both pathetic and hilarious. However, like you, I think they left because they wanted to leave, i.e. they couldn't see any benefit to themselves in staying and they wanted to make a big splash when they left. This sounds like a pathetic come back to the criticism of them for leaving early. It would be hilarious if it was true though. :)

[saintmeghanmarkle]

One sad little car and one security guard accompanying the Ginger Whinger to hold back the crowds and ensure his safety from the nasty UK at Invictus today... by u/Which-Homework2453

One sad little car and one security guard accompanying the Ginger Whinger to hold back the crowds and ensure his safety from the nasty UK at Invictus today... https://ift.tt/3fJP2d5 post link: https://ift.tt/TnCAK4a author: Which-Homework2453 submitted: May 07, 2024 at 04:30PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[mollydollyuk]

She can call herself what she likes, she'll always be a money grasping grifter. Maybe she should just call herself Princess Meghan Banana-Hammock in tribute to Pheobe in FRIENDS, it has a nice ring to it.

What should have been done as soon as they flounced off to be private people and not royals, was to take them off the Royal family website completely - no 'family section' keep it as working royals only.

Take away all their royal patronages, and have them resign from all their charities - all of them. A statement should have said they have chosen to withdraw and we respect their decision and their privacy. They no longer work to represent the monarchy in any capacity.

It should have been done. Why they insist on pussy footing around the Ginger whinger and his z list mattress actress wife I've no idea. They only have themselves to blame for this mess.

[ingek73]

After Harry’s phone hacking victory, is it last orders for tabloid top brass?

Some commentators now believe that the duke’s crusade against the popular press will finally bring about a reckoning

Inside the ballroom of the Hilton Bankside on Thursday evening, the mood among journalists was high. Prizes were being handed out, celebratory toasts were made and backs were slapped. Officiating at the annual press awards jamboree was a bow-tie-wearing Dominic Ponsford, the editor-in-chief of the industry journal behind the event, who even took a moment to joke about past clashes with Prince Harry, the fabled “ginger whinger”.

Seated at the tables around him were many of those newspaper editors and columnists who have been publicly warring with the King’s errant second child, including Piers Morgan, the former gossip journalist, talent show judge, ex-editor of the Daily Mirror and television presenter. At one point towards the end of the night the group of singers hired to jolly up the lengthy proceedings, burst into the chorus from the song The Final Countdown. Great fun.

But a day later and some in the room are facing their own ominous countdown, or at least a potential final reckoning. Could the landlord at that famous “last chance saloon”, the watering hole at which Home Office minister David Mellor once warned the “gentlemen” of the popular press they were drinking in, really be shouting out “Time, please” once again, twenty years on?

The ruling from Mr Justice Fancourt in the High Court on Friday, one which found the Duke had been subjected to damaging, illegal press activity between 2003 and 2009, has had some immediate effects. The Mirror Group of newspapers, in the frame during the legal proceedings, “apologised unreservedly” for “historical wrong-doing” later that day. But the impact of Fancourt’s 386-page judgement on the reputations of other British newspaper businesses may take a little longer to show.

“Thank goodness for Prince Harry. The police now need to look at this and promptly,” said Brian Cathcart, the media campaigner and Hacked Off founder. “There are many people involved who are still in prominent, opinion-forming positions on newspapers.”

Dr Evan Harris, a former director of Hacked Off who has spent the last few years carrying out legal analysis for the claimants in the hacking litigation, also believes the torch of justice has just been relit by the duke. “Since the contentious decision by the Crown Prosecution Service in 2015 that there was insufficient evidence to prosecute any Mirror journalist or executive for phone hacking, tens of thousands of documents have been disclosed in this litigation, and as they were deployed in open court, many key documents are available to the police to see.”

There are also dozens of new witnesses and extensive judicial findings, Harris added. “The claimants stand ready to assist the police and CPS with identifying such material relevant to the original criminal conduct and to the new questions of perjury and perverting the course of justice,” he said.

Writing in Prospect magazine, its editor, Alan Rusbridger, who edited the Guardian when it broke the hacking story in 2009, argues that Fancourt’s words have cut through years of deceit. “We know that newspaper managements at two of our biggest media companies have consistently concealed and denied the truth about what went on,” he wrote. “They have issued dishonest statements and have lied to parliament, the stock exchange, to other journalists, to regulators and even the Leveson inquiry, set up to establish the truth. And now some have been caught telling porkies in court.”

Nick Davies, who first broke the hacking scandal while at the Guardian, was quick to express his more limited hopes for change on social media. “If the UK were just and democratic, Murdoch’s Talk TV would now have to consider suspending Piers Morgan and Richard Wallace, and the Met police would have to scope an investigation into Mirror Group crime. If,” he wrote.

More than a billion pounds has already been paid out in costs and damages, Rusbridger emphasised, without any admissions of guilt implicating senior editors or owners. And key emails have been deleted and documents lost. Speaking to the Observer this weekend, he added: “The press managed to sidestep the second part of the Leveson inquiry, which was supposed to deal with past wrongdoing. So it’s now been left to individual litigants to drag the truth out into daylight. It’s not very satisfactory, and probably can’t be fully achieved until everyone involved in past misdeeds has moved on – or been moved on.”

One of the stories produced in evidence during the recent MGN phone hacking trial. Photograph: PA

The focus is now likely to switch to the Daily Mail, against which the Duke of Sussex still has many outstanding allegations. It could even be the beginning of what critics of British “tabloid culture” are heralding as an era of serious redress that, for them, would make up for the dropping of the planned second part of the Leveson inquiry, a decision taken against the judge’s wishes by former Tory culture secretary, Matt Hancock. Murdoch’s newspaper group, owner of the Sun, does look vulnerable. Many of those implicated in the judge’s ruling are working there. Former editor of the rightwing popular titles the Sun and the defunct News of the World, Rebekah Brooks, who once avoided disgrace, is now CEO of News UK. This weekend her rehabilitation looks wobbly.

Morgan, now a presenter on Murdoch’s Talk TV, gave an angry doorstep statement on Friday and still appears to be banking on dodging bullets. His carefully worded defence did not deny knowledge of the practice of phone hacking and so did not contradict the judgement, as the performer and campaigner Steve Coogan, who settled a claim in 2017 for a six-figure sum, wryly noted on Saturday morning. More optimistically, Coogan added that there now seems a chance that the protective “omertà” guarding the guilty editors has begun to weaken.

He told the Observer yesterday: “We now have a high court judge making clear that a judge-led public inquiry was misled by multiple witnesses , namely Sly Bailey, Paul Vickers, Lloyd Embley, Piers Morgan, Tina Weaver, Neil Wallis and Richard Wallace, and of course that public inquiry was cancelled halfway through, against the wishes of Sir Brian Leveson, by Matt Hancock at the behest of the newspapers – including Mirror Group – who were being investigated.”

Prince Harry has described his chief virtue as patience, but Coogan now calls him “brave” for breaking the “Faustian pact” he claims some royals have had with the press, drawn up for reasons of self-preservation.

Prince Harry’s attitude diverged from the family path well before the birth of his sonArchie in 2019, but he became much bolder after that. Later that year his wife, Meghan Markle, announced that she was suing the Mail on Sunday for printing parts of her letter to her estranged father and the duke also revealed he was taking action over alleged phone hacking.

Two years ago, the Prince won an apology from the Mail on Sunday over an article claiming he had turned his back on the military and the high court in London ruled that the same paper had breached Meghan’s privacy by publishing extracts from her letter. A year ago Harry started a libel claim against the Mail on Sunday over an article claiming he had tried to keep official protection for his family and then, in October last year, he joined the singer Elton John and others in suing the publisher of the Daily Mail, alleging phone tapping and other breaches of privacy.

The Duke’s unexpected, even historic, appearance at the high court at the beginning of his lawsuit against the Daily Mail’s publisher took place in March, and then, in early June, he arrived to give evidence at the Mirror Group phone hacking trial, arguing that about 140 articles published from 1996 to 2010 contained information obtained via unlawful methods.

There are accusations of vendettas on both sides, of course. It is a term the duke used on Friday when speaking of the vitriol he had detected, ever since he was first exposed by the tabloids as a teenager for smoking cannabis and then for rowing with his brother about whether or not to meet up with Paul Burrell.

Both of these gobbets of information reached the public through illicit means, according to the Fancourt verdict. Yet a former executive at Reach, the national news group that owns the Mirror, suspects the duke and his fellow campaigners are being disingenuous. He may not have gone as far as Morgan, who called the “California-tanned” Duke “greedy” yesterday, but he does believe the celebrity campaigners are out for revenge. “They are settling scores. We all know that, whatever they say in public about their motivation,” the former editor said.

Other more measured defenders of the press, such as Sir Alan Moses, a former chairman of the Independent Press Standards Association, are concerned about attempts to set up a phoney “licensed press” that would operate only within government restrictions. Speaking on the Today programme on BBC Radio 4 this weekend, he said the press should ideally be “unruly”, although subject to the law. There was, Moses argued, an exceptional case to be made for the industry to protect freedom of expression.

For the experienced Guardian journalist Polly Toynbee, the prize of a reformed press can now at least be glimpsed, although a fatal wound inflicted to an ailing newspaper title would not be a good thing: “I am delighted to see press standards called to account and I hope that the people behind this do now get called to account,” she said. “IPSO and press regulation are a disgrace for not investigating this themselves years ago. But it would be a tragedy if we lost the Mirror as a result, an all too rare non-Tory newspaper.”

[anonymoushouseplantfan]

Australian anon here. Haz is deluded if he thinks we will accept the Ginger and Whinger in any Commonwealth capacity. The perception of them (as well as the concept of monarchy itself) here ranges from apathetic at best to outright hatred at worst. I'm yet to meet anyone who actually supports them and I have a wide network across work and family that I'm basing this on.

From what I’ve seen the media reaction in Australia has been generally negative. Ditto New Zealand. Canada is bit more neutral but still not positive. I don’t see how they are an asset with regards to the Commonwealth.

[merrymac48]

This is obviously the post of someone with no sense of decorum :Meghan Markle is a

Pygmy compared to the glowing beautiful star that is the Princess of Wales. She is so obviously beautiful outside and inside and cared for the Queen and Prince Philip when they needed her she was there. She’s not a fake she’s not a phony she’s a kind and lovely girl. I am just so grateful to Megan Markle for leaving Britain so that Prince and Princess of Wales Do not have to see her or the ginger whinger on a daily basis. Catherine Middleton from girlhood from childhood has been known to be a caring sweet kind and terrific individual. We are so lucky to have her and if you see how she interacts with the Queen the Queen was all smiles when she was around herShe is a fantastic motherHandsome a good solid affectionate caring family

[donttempttme-blog]

The more I hear about hazbeen, the more I'm thinking he hasn't been corrupted by MEgain. The English girls were just clever enough not to marry into the RF [though that is part of it]. But he is just a total piece of shit and the others realised this and ran for the hills. They had the grace, manners, etc, to shut up about their experiences with the man child and once again, his secrets were safe. The mattress actress turned up and they brought out the absolute worst in each other and put it on display for the entire world to view. He's actually as bad or worse than she is. I used to feel bad for him. Not any more.

[solitairemeb-blog]

Archificial's birthday party was so important. But she managed to make sure she got in a papp stroll in designer clothes. What a wanker. "Real news. Honest views". That's an oxymoron. She's even more stupid than dicktrump and I did not think that was possible 🤔 How does she manage to walk AND breathe? Oh that's right. Breathing is automatic.

[jake-a-day]

Day 78:

Had a surprise visit today and Jake had accidentally been trapped in the new temporary building when we went to go to a meeting about my wedding! We found him maybe a couple of hours later the poor thing. It’s not too bad but my dad said he’d be careful trying not to trap him in future. It makes sense he was vocal afterwards.

[celticcrossanon]

CC, British journalist Jan Moir asked Gayle King if she thought the Royal Family was racist and GK said no and that Ginger & Whinger didn't think the Royal Family was racist either. Then Jan Moir wrote this article: "I wanted to watch Harry and Meghan's terrible betrayal up close to see if there was even a flicker of remorse. I saw nothing but exultation." Harry is enjoying this. It's sickening to watch.

Hi Nonny,

It is sickening to watch. Both of them are enjoying this to the utmost. The energy turns my stomach and makes me feel sick. They honestly think they can tear the family to shreds, make as much money as they can off the BRF, and then turn up for the coronation as if nothing had happened. I am feeling ill from the energy around the Harkle reality show at the moment, and that is just from reading about it online. I'd throw up if I tried to watch it or saw clips from it.

I am hoping that this is a case of pride (or gloating over the pain you have caused others) going before a very big fall.

[saintmeghanmarkle]

Does any sinner know more about Tom Quinn? by u/Nervous-Spinach2046

Does any sinner know more about Tom Quinn? Tom Quinn is the new Scooobie, that much we know. But what makes a 68-year-old published author so desperate for money that he would willingly blow up his reputation and shill for TOW and the ginger whinger? Is he a sugar all along?I’ve never heard of him before. After a bit of googling, and here’s what I’ve found:He’s published six books on the BRF, and one is in the pipeline:Backstairs Billy (2015) – about the Queen Mum’s most trusted pageMrs Keppel (2016) – about King Edward VII’s mistress Alice Keppel, who is also Queen Camilla’s great grandmotherThe Reluctant Billionaire (2018) - about Gerald Grosvenor, Sixth Duke of Westminster (father of the current duke, Hugh)Kensington Palace: An Intimate Memoir from Queen Mary to Meghan Markle (2020)Scandals of the Royal Palaces: An Intimate Memoir of Royals Behaving Badly (2021)Gilded Youth: An Intimate History of Growing Up in the Royal Family (2023)Upcoming: Yes Ma'am: Upstairs Downstairs in the British Royal Family (August 2024)He is very prolific, and writes a lot about behind-the-scenes of the RF. I must say, if he weren’t such a sugar now, I would very much like to read some of his books, especially 1, 6, 7.From a bio I found on him on publisher Hachette’s website, he has spent 20 years talking to people in domestic service to learn about their lives. He’s also written a few bios of people who worked as servants. This is very interesting to me.Before he started writing about the RF, he’s written about a wide range of topics:fishing, eccentrics, long walks, railways, early aviation and the First World War, as well as the children’s author and illustrator Denys Watkins-Pitchford (better known as BB).(Source) He was the author of the “Strangest” series of books, and the editor of two magazines: The Countryman and Country Landowner’s Magazine. He also regularly appeared on British TV to talk about eccentrics, London history, and the RF.He had a blog, which only has three entries, all from 2021. From one of the entries we can see he has at least one son, who was studying to become a lawyer.What gives an inkling of his Markle sympathies is the cover of the Kensington Palace book: the most famous inhabitant of KP in the 20th century was undoubtedly Diana, Princess of Wales; the most famous in the century before that, was Queen Victoria before she came to the throne. Her mother has even named the set of rules governing Victoria’s upbringing The Kensington System. For the 21st century, I would say it would be William and Catherine, the current PPOW. But Quinn had this on the cover of his KP book:https://ift.tt/Slhq8y1 lived in Nott Cott in the KP grounds for, what, 5 minutes? Complaining the whole time, about the size, low ceiling, the name etc, of a piece of prime real estate in Central London? For free? (I assume H’s rent was paid by Charles). Not at all representative of such an illustrious palace.And then his last book, Gilded Youth, has this cover:https://ift.tt/VBAfq7J? Why not use either of these?Getty ImagesGetty ImagesI think it must be his solid background that made him a prime choice for the new UK PR “guru” to hire as the new Scooobie. Seemed less biased. But the shilling is so transparent. It’s rather sad to see him become a mouthpiece for the Harkles, although the bias was already there.Does anyone know more about him? post link: https://ift.tt/ZEbRmid author: Nervous-Spinach2046 submitted: May 30, 2024 at 12:38PM via SaintMeghanMarkle on Reddit disclaimer: all views + opinions expressed by the author of this post, as well as any comments and reblogs, are solely the author's own; they do not necessarily reflect the views of the administrator of this Tumblr blog. For entertainment only.

[world-of-wales]

Heck harry being hotter than Carl philip, who so ever wrote this article needs eyes and a frontal lobotomy

Atleast Baldy (then Rapunzel) is on the number one spot😋. Love seeing the ginger whinger play a second fiddle to him in random articles as well 😌

THATS THE FIRST THING I SAW TOO!!! I opened it for the other guy but the first thing I did was 'Where's my prince of wales?'

Ikr? It's just some sort of petty sadistic pleasure I get whenever I see him somewhere below Wills. Idk what it is with me but it's an instant serotonin blast to me. This is u and I whenever we see the spare -

[zee-man-chatter]

Mark Dolan: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry seem hellbent on DESTROYING the monarchy . There’s no going back now for Yoko Moano and the Ginger Whinger according to Mark. Can’t agree more, off with their titles!