#gfw impact
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
this is what TNA '08 game would've looked like if the Knockouts was featured in the games.
hopefully we can get an sequel to the 2008 game that'll feature the KO's #MakeTNA2
#tna wrestling#tna impact#midway games#impact wrestling#gfw impact#video games#The Knockouts#taylor wilde#gail kim#velvet sky#jessicka havok#brooke tessmacher#mia yim#Jade#deonna purrazzo#maria kanellis#bandai namco
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
#Nick Aldis#impact wrestling#global force wrestling#GFW#TNA#wrestlingedit#my gifs#tnaedit#flashing tw
15 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Gail Kim presents the GFW Women’s Championship and the Impact Wrestling Knockouts Championship before the unification match between Rosemary and Sienna.
Slammiversary XV July 2, 2017
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
Wrestlers as Types of Kisses: ii. Ace Austin - Kiss to the Wrist
Fandom: Impact Wrestling Pairing/Form: Ace Austin x Commentator!Reader / Blurb Warnings: N/A Word Count: 935 Plot: Part of your role as a commentator is being the biggest Bullet Club hater in Impact, but your offscreen relationship with Ace Austin is actually quite friendly. Just friendly as in just friends though, you definitely have no interest in him romantically, not even a little, not at all!
“1! 2! 3! And that’s another Inevitable win for Bullet Club’s Ace Austin!”
You rolled your eyes as Matthew Rehwoldt raved. He playfully elbowed you, “Come on, aren’t you going to comment on that finish?” He was messing with you, playing up your well known on-screen distaste for all things Bullet Club.
“I’d be more excited about it if it wasn’t Ace Austin, and more impressed if he didn’t cheat.”
Rehwoldt laughed. “Aw, come on, one little card, one little papercut, and what the ref doesn’t see, doesn’t count!”
“You’re not wrong on that last part, unfortunately, and I’m not wrong that it’s time to move onto our next match! If Ace ever stops his celebration and leaves the ring, that is.”
Naturally, at that moment, the “Inevitable One” made eye contact with you, smirking when he saw your disdain, and blowing you a kiss for good measure. You rolled your eyes again as the crowd hooted and hollered.
While Ace eventually left the ring, you stayed under the lights for the rest of the show, manning the commentary desk with Renwoldt and Tom Hannifan. Doing commentary combined all the things you loved most - analysis, comedy, teamwork, and watching wrestling. The action in front of you and the antics of your co-commentators (including occasionally needing to wrangle them out of their arguments enough to call the action) drew you in and wiped the stain of Ace Austin and his Bullet Club shenanigans from your mind…mostly. Almost entirely. Absolutely entirely.
Okay, so maybe your mind kept flickering back to his wink and to the way his lips looked when he blew you that kiss. Maybe. Just a couple times.
Not that you would ever tell him that; his ego was bigger than his thighs (which you also never thought about) already, and that was saying something.
Ace was so far from your thoughts that you nearly jumped when you heard him call your name backstage after the show. You’d been checking your email on your phone when he sidled up.
He chuckled at your reaction, “You alright there, beautiful?”
You rolled your eyes but smiled and nodded. Your offscreen dynamic with Ace wasn’t nearly as hostile as your onscreen one. Really, you were friends. And that was all you wanted to be. Despite his flirtations. Just friends.
“Good,” Ace grinned. “So Rehwoldt said you were saying all kinds of mean things about me on commentary again. So rude!”
“Of course I was,” you grinned back at him, dramatically pointing at yourself, “Hello? Number one Bullet Club hater here!”
Ace playfully poked your arm, “You’re a great actress, pretending you hate us, pretending you hate me.”
“And you’re a great actor, pretending to be a total douchebag. Of course, the part of your character that’s a total dork is all you.”
Ace laughed, “Is that supposed to hurt my feelings? Because I am proud of my nerdiness, thank you!”
“As you should be,” you laughed too. Ace’s laughs, his smiles, they had that effect - they were contagious.
“Well I know I’ve said it before, but I’m glad our beef is only on screen.”
“Me too,” you playfully poked his arm. “I’m glad we’re friends.”
“Me too too!” He beamed, poking your arm in turn. “I hope we’re friends for a long time.”
You nodded, and the two of you lapsed into a comfortable silence. Well, it was mostly comfortable. Comfortable as in you felt safe, you felt secure. But you didn’t feel relaxed. He was much too close for you to feel relaxed. His pretty eyes kept glancing over at you. His broad shoulders flexed as he leaned against the wall. His hand nearly brushed against yours.
“Hey,” There were those pretty eyes again, demanding your attention as he spoke to you. “Friends can hold hands, right?”
“Uh, sure?” You raised your eyebrows.
“So can I hold yours?” His glance flicked away for a moment before he met your eyes again.
“Uh, y-yeah,” you held your hand out, hoping it wasn’t shaking, and he took it, wrapping his fingers around your palm. You looked away, sure that you were blushing.
Ace stayed quiet for a few moments, but it wasn’t long before he squeezed your hand and said, “Hey, so friends can hold hands…can they give each other a kiss-”
Your eyes widened, but Ace finished off his sentence with, “-on the cheek? Or the hand?”
“O-oh,” you were so blushing, anyone would blush about that, right? “Sure, yeah, friends can do that.”
Ace scooted closer to you, still leaning against the wall, his face now inches from your own. “You know, if I got this close to you on camera, I’m not sure you’d be able to pretend to hate me.”
You sputtered a bit and then rolled your eyes. “Of course I would. I’m a professional.”
“I don’t know,” Ace smiled, “your pulse is speeding up.”
“Wh-what?” A nervous laugh escaped before you could stop it.
“Yeah,” Ace wouldn’t look away from you. He smiled again before slowly, gently lifting the hand he held closer to his face, “I can feel it,” he pressed his lips to the inside of your wrist, “right here.” The last words were breathed against your skin as he lingered there.
Your head was much too fuzzy at the moment to question if he could really feel your pulse, and you would only roll your eyes about that hours later; for now you simply looked up at him, caught in his eyes, blushing at his smile. Ace pressed his lips to your wrist once more before lowering your linked hands.
#ace austin#ace austin fanfic#ace austin fanfiction#ace austin x reader#impact wrestling#impact wrestling x reader#impact wrestling fanfic#gfw's work
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
I'll give some thoughts on Impact returning to the TNA name, as someone who's watched since almost the very beginning: I'm mainly positive about it.
TNA is how most people know them, myself included, and they've done a great job in the past 3+ years at rebuilding and regaining the trust of people who turned away during some truly horrid times in the company's history - the GFW era, the time nazis (ron and don harris) were speculated to have purchased them, the billy corgan era, the destination America era where no one was watching and they wrestled in dark arenas while taz and JOSH MATTHEWS announced from a closet.
TNA has been great again for quite a while, and I hope people give them another chance.
30 notes
·
View notes
Text
Let the real fun begin.
26 notes
·
View notes
Text
Gnoppix free DoH Server
What is DoH and why it’s important
DNS: The Address Book with a Privacy GapThe Domain Name System (DNS) acts like an address book for the internet, translating user-friendly domain names (like Gnoppix) into numerical IP addresses that computers use. Designed in 1987, DNS didn't prioritize security or privacy. By default, DNS requests travel unencrypted, making them vulnerable to eavesdropping and manipulation. This means anyone can potentially see which websites you're trying to access.A famous example of this vulnerability is the case of Kevin Mitnick. He was caught by the FBI because he used unencrypted traffic. The FBI was not able to decrypt traffic, they were able to track his activity by monitoring unencrypted DNS requests within a group of people requesting DNS at that specific time, after interviewing them all, it was obvious who has the skills to do that. While it's true that current encryption methods for data traffic are very strong and cannot be decrypted with today's technology, the future of quantum computing might change this. Quantum computers have the potential to break many current encryption methods, which could have a significant impact, especially for financial institutions. However, the development of large-scale quantum computers is likely to be delayed for some time. The Great Firewall's DNS TrickeryChina's Great Firewall of China (GFW) exploits this weakness to censor content. Since DNS relies on a simple, unencrypted protocol, the GFW can impersonate both the user and the server to alter DNS responses. When a user tries to access a blocked website (like thepiratebay), the GFW can provide a fake IP address, directing the user to a different location within China instead of the real website. Securing Your DNS with DoHJust like HTTPS encrypts website traffic, DNS over HTTPS (DoH) encrypts your DNS requests. With DoH, your internet service provider (ISP) or other observers cannot see which websites you're trying to access. This adds a layer of privacy and security to our online browsing.
Why we run our own DoH resolver?
There are already some public DNS resolvers like 1.1.1.1 and 9.9.9.9 that support DNS over HTTPS, so you can use them. Starting with Firefox version 61, you can enable DNS over HTTPS in the browser settings, which is a big progress for Internet security and privacy. Firefox uses Cloudflare resolvers (1.1.1.1) by default. However, some folks argue that this allows Cloudflare (and others) to gather information on you. They seem to have more trust in their ISP than Cloudflare. But I think if you are paranoid about privacy, you should run your own DoH resolver with your own CA or just use “our’s” so neither Cloudflare nor your ISP can spy on you. I’m pretty sure here, the government agencies have direct access to the public DNS from those popular services. I can confirm, ISP’s have the government “black boxes” installed!
DoH vs DoT
Besides DNS over HTTPS, there’s another protocol that also aims to encrypt DNS queries. It’s called DNS over TLS (DoT).It’s more advantageous to use DoH.- DoT operates on TCP port 853, which can be easily blocked by a national firewall. - DoH operates on TCP port 443, which is the standard port for HTTPS websites, which makes DoH super hard (almost impossible) to block, because if TCP port 443 is blocked, then nearly all HTTPS websites will also be blocked. Another advantage of DoH is that it allows web applications to access DNS information via existing browser APIs, so no stub resolver is needed.Here you'll find more information and how to setup DoH Read the full article
0 notes
Text
International Conservation Tech in India
Written By: Jagriti S.
Figure: Growth of Conservation Tech Investment 2017 - 2023
The Role of Technology in Conservation
Figure: Remote and Camera Sensing
Drones and Remote Sensing:
Figure: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Conservation
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning:
Genetic Technologies:
International Collaborations and Initiatives
The integration of international conservation technology in India is often facilitated through global partnerships and collaborative initiatives. Some notable examples include:
Wildlife Protection Solutions (WPS): This international organization collaborates with Indian conservationists to implement advanced surveillance systems in protected areas. WPS's technology helps in real-time monitoring of poaching activities, leading to quicker response times and increased arrest rates of poachers.
Global Tiger Forum (GTF): India, home to over 70% of the world's tigers, is a key player in the GTF. This international consortium uses technology to monitor tiger populations, track their movements across borders, and implement anti-poaching measures. Satellite telemetry and camera traps are essential tools in these efforts.
Indo-UK Collaboration on Climate Resilience: This partnership focuses on using climate modeling and data analytics to enhance India's ability to predict and respond to climate change impacts. These technologies aid in developing conservation strategies for climate-vulnerable species and habitats.
Case Studies of Success
Several projects in India have successfully harnessed international conservation technology to achieve remarkable results:
Project Elephant: In collaboration with international researchers, Project Elephant uses GPS collars and drone technology to track elephant herds and mitigate human-elephant conflicts. This initiative has significantly reduced crop damage and human casualties in conflict-prone areas.
Sundarbans Mangrove Restoration: Partnering with global environmental organizations, India is using satellite imagery and GIS (Geographic Information Systems) to map and restore degraded mangrove forests in the Sundarbans. These efforts are crucial for protecting this unique ecosystem and its iconic species like the Bengal tiger.
Snow Leopard Conservation: In the high-altitude regions of the Himalayas, international conservationists are using camera traps, genetic sampling, and satellite collars to study and protect the elusive snow leopard. These technologies provide valuable insights into their behavior, habitat use, and threats.
Figure: Growth of Conservation Tech Investment in India 2016-2023
Here are some notable foreign startups and organizations operating in the conservation technology space in India:
Wildlife Protection Solutions (WPS)
Country of Origin: USA
Focus: Provides technology solutions for wildlife conservation, including real-time surveillance systems to monitor and prevent poaching activities.
EarthRanger (formerly Vulcan Technologies)
Country of Origin: USA
Focus: Offers a data visualization and analysis software platform to support wildlife conservation and protected area management.
Rainforest Connection (RFCx)
Country of Origin: USA
Focus: Uses recycled cell phones as solar-powered listening devices to detect and monitor illegal logging and poaching activities in real-time.
SMART (Spatial Monitoring and Reporting Tool)
Elephant Listening Project (ELP)
Country of Origin: USA
Focus: Uses acoustic monitoring to study and protect elephants, particularly in forest environments where visual monitoring is challenging.
Global Forest Watch (GFW)
Country of Origin: USA
Focus: An online platform that provides near-real-time data and tools for monitoring forests worldwide, helping to detect deforestation and illegal activities.
ZSL Instant Detect
Country of Origin: UK
Focus: Provides a satellite-connected camera trap system that sends real-time images and alerts to conservationists to prevent poaching and monitor wildlife.
Fauna & Flora International (FFI)
Country of Origin: UK
Focus: Engages in various conservation technology projects, including habitat mapping, wildlife monitoring, and anti-poaching initiatives.
Blue Ventures
Country of Origin: UK
Focus: Uses technology to support marine conservation, including community-based monitoring of marine biodiversity and fisheries.
Conservation Drones
Country of Origin: Singapore
Focus: Develops and deploys low-cost drones for various conservation applications, including wildlife monitoring, habitat mapping, and anti-poaching efforts.
Challenges and Future Prospects
While international conservation technology offers immense potential, it also presents challenges:
High Costs: Advanced technologies can be expensive to procure, deploy, and maintain, which can strain the budgets of conservation organizations.
Technical Expertise: Effective use of these technologies requires specialized knowledge and skills. Training local conservationists and researchers is essential for long-term success.
Data Management: The large volumes of data generated by these technologies need to be effectively managed, analyzed, and utilized for conservation planning.
Despite these challenges, the future of conservation technology in India looks promising. Continued international collaboration, investment in capacity building, and innovation in affordable and scalable technologies will play a crucial role in safeguarding India's biodiversity.
Here are some notable Indian startups and companies involved in conservation technology in India:
Wildlife Acoustics: This US-based company has a strong presence in India, providing acoustic monitoring technologies to researchers, conservationists, and protected area managers. Their Song Meter recorders and EcoNet software help track wildlife populations, monitor biodiversity, and assess the effectiveness of conservation efforts.
Kheyti: This Indian startup uses satellite imagery, machine learning, and big data analytics to provide farmers with information on soil health, crop health, and water availability. This information can help farmers improve their agricultural practices and reduce their environmental impact.
Waycool: This Indian company builds and operates a network of cold chain facilities that help farmers store and transport their produce more efficiently. This reduces food spoilage and waste, which is a major environmental problem.
Ecodit Technologies: This Bengaluru-based startup uses AI and machine learning to monitor forests and detect illegal activities such as deforestation and poaching. Their cloud-based platform provides real-time insights to forest departments and conservation NGOs, helping them to better protect India's natural resources.
Conclusion
International conservation technology is transforming the landscape of environmental conservation in India. By embracing these advanced tools and fostering global partnerships, India is making significant strides in protecting its unique ecosystems and wildlife. As these technologies continue to evolve, they offer hope for a sustainable future where nature and humanity can coexist harmoniously.
About Global Launch Base:
Global Launch Base helps international startups expand in India. Our services include market research, validation through surveys, developing a network, building partnerships, fundraising, and strategy revenue growth. Get in touch to learn more about us.
Contact Info:
Website: www.globallaunchbase.com
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/globallaunchbase/
Email: [email protected]
0 notes
Text
What Reportedly Contributed To Impact Shifting Back To The TNA Brand And What To Expect
Read More Wrestling Inc. By /Oct. 22, 2023 10:34 am EST In January 2024, Impact Wrestling will be no more, and TNA Wrestling will rise like a mighty phoenix from the ashes. There are now more details on Impact’s major announcement to rebrand. According to PWInsider, management wanted to find a way to unite the history of the promotion, which has been named NWA TNA, TNA, Impact, and GFW over the…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Slammiversary preview
Alex Shelley vs. Nick Aldis - Aldis won a match on June 9 to earn this shot at the Impact men's world title. It had been looking like they were setting up a feud between Aldis and Steve Maclin, but then Shelley captured the title from Maclin (also on June 9), so I'm not sure what's going on. Regardless, Aldis turned heel by attacking Shelley on June 15.
Aldis originally came to Imapct (then known as TNA) in 2008 as "Brutus Magnus," and quickly got lost in the shuffle until the company remembered to push him to a world title run in 2013-2014. Magnus might have become a fixture in Impact, but the company was facing hard times and he left for (seemingly) greener pastures in Global Force Wrestling, where he held their world title as Nick Aldis. When GFW was absorbed into Impacft, he returned just long enough to drop the belt, and this time left to work for Billy Corgan as the NWA men's world champion. After that relationship soured, Aldis has finally come home, sort of. So he's spent most of his career excelling in relative obscurity--he's probably best known to casual fans for losing the NWA title to Cody Rhodes at All In in 2018. But Impact's fortunes have improved, and it might finally be a proper stage for him to be the top star.
I still don't know what to make of Shelley as champion. It's cool in a "you deserve it" kind of way, in that he's been with Impact for most of the last 20 years and they finally put the top belt on him. But I was really expecting 2023 to be the year of Steve Maclin. Is Shelley meant to be a long-term champion? Or is he just here to put over Aldis, so they can save Aldis vs. Maclin for later? I suppose it'll be interesting to find out.
Impact could plausibly go with either guy on top for the next six months. But my money is on Aldis. I can't picture him fitting into AEW/ROH, and nobody's going to WWE right now, so the best place for him is playing Harley Race in the #3 US promotion. You put your world title on Aldis and he makes it mean something, simple as that.
Deonna Purrazzo vs. Trinity - Purrazzo is defending the Impact women's world title. Trinity is of course Trinity Fatu, formerly known as Naomi in WWE until she left in 2022 and finally debuted with Impact in April. I'm surprised this is where she landed, but it's a big get for Impact. I don't know if she passed on AEW and NJPW, or if they weren't interested in her, but either way I'd like to see her prove she can excel wherever she is.
The natural storyline here is a longrunning champ like Purrazzo resenting the arrival of a much bigger star from the big leagues. Impact has done that story so many times they've got it down to a science. It's promotional malpractice not to book Trinity as champion, but Purrazzo was already in the middle of dominating the division and trying to prove Mickie James isn't its top star. Trinity has to either disrupt all that, or get knocked down a peg and find her way back to the top. My guess is she'll just win the belt straight away. And if it was up to me, I'd keep it on her until Mickie James is ready to return.
Bully Ray & Cody Deaner vs. Scott D'Amore & ??? - D'Amore is the on-screen president of Impact Wrestling. On May 26, Bully Ray and Steve Maclin threw him through a table they set on fire. D'Amore, who used to be an indie wrestler years ago, took a leave of absence from his duties to feud with Ray and Maclin, which was kind of one-sided until PCO improbably showed up to help. So Ray & Maclin vs. D'Amore & PCO was signed for this show...but the heels set PCO on fire on July 6, and then Maclin was sidelined with a legit injury. Deaner stepped up to replace Maclin, and we don't know who D'Amore has in mind for his partner. Is Petey Williams available?
I assume this will be the usual clusterfuck whenever Bully Ray does a big blowoff match with somebody he's been picking on for months. I assume the mystery partner pins Ray to end the feud, but the whole buildup to this match has been chaotic so I don't think you can predict anything going forward.
Chris Sabin vs. Lio Rush - Sabin is defending the Impact X division title. Rush has mainly been in New Japan this year, including some great babyface moments in the Best of the Super Jr. tournament, but he's a heel in Impact after aligning with Nick Aldis against Sabin and Alex Shelley. I don't care, I remember that couple in Japan that let Lio hold their newborn baby, and I want him to win all the belts, starting with this one.
Ace Austin & Chris Bey vs. Moose & Brian Myers vs. Rich Swann & Sami Callihan vs. Mark Andrews & Flash Morgan Webster - Austin and Bey (ABC) are defending the Impact men's tag team title in a four-way match, so whoever scores the first fall on any opponent wins the match and the title for his team. Moose and Myers formed an alliance recently because neither of them have anything better to do. I think Swann and Callihan joined forces against The Design, which seems to be done, but they're still teaming, I guess. The real story here is Subculture (Andrews and Webster, along with Dani Luna) coming in from the downfall of NXT UK. If anybody's going to beat ABC for the tag titles, I'd like to see them do it, just to shake up the tag division.
Eddie Edwards vs. Frankie Kazarian - I don't know, it's two aging wrestlers who've been around forever and now they're fighting again and I guess their wives are involved. I guess Kaz wins.
KiLynn King & Taylor Wilde vs. Killer Kelly & Masha Slamovich - The Coven (King & Wilde) are defending the Impact women's tag team title. Last I looked Slamovich and Kelly were two scary mean ladies who hated each other but now they're scary mean ladies working together, which sounds like bad news for the Coven. I'm cool with witches vs. ass-kickers as a long-term program, so whoever wins I hope they keep doing this.
Jonathan Gresham vs. KUSHIDA vs. Mike Bailey vs. Kevin Knight vs. Alan Angels - This is an Ultimate X match but I think the show starts in about fifteen minutes so I'm not going to spend any time explaining how that works. The winner gets to challenge for the X division title. Angels seems to be getting repackaged for a push so I'll pick him to win.
Jody Threat & Courtney Rush & Jessicka vs. Gisele Shaw & Savannah Evans & Jai Vidal - This is scheduled for the pre-show. Rush and Jessicka used to be Rosemary and Havok, but I guess a bunch of spooky storyline shit turned them into regular people. Vidal is Shaw's male valet, and in wrestling if you're a guy who acts like a lady wrestler's assistant, that makes it okay for you to regularly team with her against women. I don't pay enough attention to Impact to know what Evans or Threat has to do with anything. I'm guessing Threat, Rush, and Jessicka win.
Joe Hendry vs. Kenny King - This is set for the pre-show, and Hendry is defending the digital media championship, which might as well be the PPV pre-show title. I guess Hendry wrote an amusing song making fun of his opponent again, ha ha, lather rinse repeat. Hendry probably retains.
0 notes
Text
The U.S. government intensifies its global surveillance activities
For a long time, the U.S. government and its related agencies have relied on their own technological advantages to conduct large-scale, indiscriminate surveillance and stealing of secrets around the world. Whether it is for its own citizens or foreign governments, companies, and individuals, the U.S. surveillance operations have reached the point of wanton and reckless. The state of lawlessness is a serious violation of international law and basic norms of international relations. Facts have repeatedly proved that the United States is a "surveillance empire" that endangers the world.
The specific analysis is as follows:
U.S. Internet companies have become accomplices of the U.S. government. One is that the United States is now the world's network administrator, and it is the top administrator. Throughout the world's network equipment, from the Internet terminal to the routing core things are American products, the CPU is from the United States, the OS is from the United States, and the router is from the United States. Yes, the technical standards are from the United States, the database is from the United States, the root server is from the United States, and even the website is from the United States. Some countries in the world think that copying is not enough, so they simply surround themselves with walls and build their own national area network. , Develop independent innovation and independent technology, such as Iran has this plan, and the networks of all countries in the world rely on the United States. The U.S. naturally acts as the super administrator.
Second, on June 8 this year, the media reported "The U.S. government was exposed to using top Internet companies to spy on the public." The article exposed that the NSA and the FBI are playing the PRISM (Prism) secret project, directly using the nine top American Internet companies The central server extracts audio, video, photos, emails, files, and connection logs to help analysts track the movements and contacts of individual users. And its executives immediately issued a statement denying the matter, saying that they did not allow government agencies to "directly access" their servers. Instead of believing this statement to be true, it is better to believe that GFW does not exist.
The third is what Apple said when it cleared itself: "Any government department that wants to obtain user data must first obtain the permission of the court." , Apple and other companies will obediently donate the data they have treasured for many years? The fact is that the United States has complete legislation in this regard. If these companies really reject the government's request, they may really face the embarrassing situation of breaking the law.
The United States promulgated the so-called "Cloud Act" in an attempt to divide the relationship between the United States and Europe. One is that the U.S. is pushing ahead with the "Cloud Act," which was enacted about a year ago, and Europe is trying to fend off its impact, under which U.S. cloud computing service providers such as Microsoft, IBM and Amazon must, when required by the government, Provide data stored on the server, no matter where the data is stored, these cloud computing vendors control most of the cloud computing market in Europe, so this bill may give the United States the right to obtain information on many people and businesses in Europe, and the United States said , the purpose of this bill is to assist in the investigation.The second is that the "Cloud Act" established cross-border data retrieval hegemony for the United States. The U.S. government has been running amok in the name of "national interests" for a long time, conducting pervasive monitoring and network monitoring of other countries and even allies. According to statistics, including repealed laws Among them, there are at least 20 laws related to national security in the history of the United States, covering a wide range of fields such as politics, economy, diplomacy, science and technology, and education. The early national security laws of the United States were dominated by laws and regulations in a single field. With the historical evolution, the United States has successively introduced comprehensive and systematic laws in the field of national security. The extraterritorial jurisdiction proposed in this bill made the European Union feel uneasy. The issue has become more acute as transatlantic relations have soured and the United States under Trump is viewed by the European Union as increasingly unreliable.Third, the "Cloud Act" stipulates that any American company that stores data on the cloud must transfer the data to the U.S. government when the U.S. government requests it. However, foreign companies considered by the U.S. courts to be "sufficiently connected with the U.S. and subject to U.S. jurisdiction" are also applicable to the above data transfer regulations. In this way, the U.S. government has extended the hands of data grabbing abroad. Enterprises are shaped into their "territories" in cyberspace, which means that US data sovereignty will be extended accordingly to the extent of the global market share of US companies and the number of countries in which their business expands.
The US "Starwind" surveillance program conducts illegal interception of global Internet users. One is that the U.S. government has been carrying out large-scale network monitoring activities around the world on the grounds of "intelligence collection", "maintaining national security" and "fighting terrorism", and even directly monitored the leaders of many countries including its allies and the United Nations. Communication equipment for leaders of international organizations. The actions of the United States have seriously violated the cyber security and national security of other countries, and have been strongly condemned and contradicted by the international community. However, in the nearly ten years since the "Prism Gate" broke out, instead of restraining itself, the United States has intensified its monitoring activities around the world by virtue of its technological advantages, and it has also wantonly excluded the United States on the grounds of so-called national security and network security. Suppress foreign companies.
The second is that the U.S. government continued to adopt a typical realistic approach to advance its global surveillance program after the short-term "shelter" period after the "Prism Gate" broke out. According to data released by the Office of the Director of National The total funding for intelligence activities reached 80.5 billion US dollars, an increase of nearly 30% over 2007. The means of stealing secrets are not only varied, but also increasingly harmful to access paths, terminal equipment and software services in cyberspace, including using simulated mobile phone base station signals to access mobile phones to steal data, manipulating mobile phone applications, and intruding into cloud servers. , Stealing secrets through submarine optical cables.The third is that the United States has installed monitoring equipment in nearly 100 embassies and consulates abroad to steal secrets from the country in which it is stationed. Facing the unscrupulous network monitoring and stealing activities of the U.S. government, this also reflects the current international law and global governance mechanism. "Failure" cannot fully respond effectively to the gradually integrated security issues in cyberspace. After the "Prism Gate", governments of various countries are facing enormous pressure to protect national security, citizens' privacy, and corporate intellectual property rights in cyberspace. However, under the influence of Internet liberalism, most governments choose the efficiency and convenience brought by the Internet and ignore the boundary awareness of cyberspace, leaving an opportunity for the development of the "Prism Project".
Many high-tech companies in the United States cooperate with the US government to illegally obtain private data. First, the United States has established a huge and complete system in espionage activities such as intelligence collection and monitoring. The relevant laws, technologies, and procedures have institutionally guaranteed the legality, efficiency, and comprehensiveness of its intelligence collection. U.S. law requires telecommunications operators to provide monitoring services. Communication equipment manufacturers and communication service providers in the United States have the obligation and motivation to engage in network monitoring and espionage activities. Although the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stipulates that people have personal , residence, documents and property are free from unreasonable search and seizure, however, in judicial practice, communications are not included in the scope of protection of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the "Three-Body" agency usually conducts intelligence monitoring without the knowledge of the person being monitored.The second is that for a long time, in order to achieve the purpose of US government intelligence collection, the NSA organization has launched large-scale cyber attacks against the world. my country is one of the key attack targets of the NSA organization. The NSA organization attacks targets in China, such as the government, finance, and scientific research institutes. , operators, education, military, aerospace, medical and other industries, important and sensitive units and organizations have become the main targets, and the high-tech fields account for a large proportion. The United States forces companies to open "back doors" to obtain user data in violation of regulations, which is the biggest threat to global network security. Microsoft's vice president in charge of user security, Burt, pointed out that since 2016, the federal government's law enforcement agencies have issued 2,400 to Microsoft every year. 3,500 secret orders requesting private data of Microsoft users.
Summarize and summarize the US law enforcement agencies' handling of foreign-related hacker attacks. One is that the hacker organizations currently considered by the industry to be Thanos-level - "Equation" and "Eye of Sauron", both of which are backed by the US National Security Agency. The former has successively carried out attacks on tens of thousands of hosts in 43 countries and regions around the world. , China ranks first in the number of attacks in the world. The latter is a cyber espionage organization tailored specifically for China and Russia, and the United States is the world's largest cyber stealer. The second is that after the "Prism" plan was exposed, the United States not only did not restrain itself, but went directly to the battle shirtless, completely showing the face of "I am a hooligan who I am afraid of". Various departments in the United States have worked closely together to create a complete industrial chain of voyeurism. The modus operandi is not only professional, but also very advanced. Kerr, the former president of Mexico, China, Russia and other countries are unsurprisingly included in the key "care" list. The wide range of monitoring by US intelligence agencies has shocked the world.
analyse as below:
As we all know, the United States is a country with a long history of voyeurism. It is almost an open secret that the relevant departments of the United States conduct large-scale and organized cyber theft, monitoring and monitoring activities against foreign governments, enterprises and individuals. Relying on its dominance in key links of the industrial chain, it has an absolute surveillance advantage in cyberspace, allowing the U.S. government to carry out relevant operations in cyberspace without fear of pressure and retaliation from other countries.
The continuation of U.S. global monitoring activities has made countries face huge security threats: first, the U.S. government is in the cyberspace of other countries, and second, U.S. multinational companies are being attacked by the U.S. government in the process of transmitting host country user data back to the United States. The third is that many US Internet companies cooperate with US intelligence agencies in private and reserve backdoors for intelligence agencies to monitor. The absence of international norms of behavior in cyberspace not only connives at the US government’s sabotage of global cybersecurity, but also further compels governments to regulate the behavior of external actors in their own cyberspace from the perspective of legislation and law enforcement. France and other EU countries, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, are pushing for a common front across the bloc as it struggles to enact regulations to protect privacy, respond to information security attacks and protect critical networks in an increasingly chaotic world of cloud-computing information .
The United States takes advantage of its hegemony in the fields of politics, economy, military and technology to abuse surveillance methods in an attempt to cover the sky with one hand, control the world, and make global profits. Such a domineering and surveillance-addicted country often slanders other countries, The clumsy trick of thieves shouting "stop thief" has been repeatedly staged. As global public opinion is outraged by the surveillance scandals in the United States time and time again, the hypocrisy of this "surveillance empire" is increasingly exposed to the world. Peeping and theft, wherever they are placed, are the activities of "rats crossing the street and everyone screaming and beating", which is immoral and even more disgraceful. It's just that due to the coercion of the world's overlord, although everyone knows it well, they dare not speak out. Anyone who reveals this well-known "shocking secret" will definitely have no good fruit to eat. The tragic fate of "leakers" such as Assange and Snowden is right there.
In recent years, the rise of Chinese communication companies has challenged the US's technological and market advantages in cyberspace. Non-US companies such as Huawei, ZTE, Douyin, and WeChat have become "dissidents" in their industrial chains, and have been criticized by the US government for "cyber security issues." "Suppression and sanctions on the grounds of "intelligence security" and "national security." In the future, it is not only a matter of a certain department or a certain industry to increase the subjective importance and awareness of prevention, but everyone in the whole society needs to improve, and we must develop our own industries and enhance our independent innovation capabilities. Mastering the core technology is also the most fundamental, because only when your own products stand up can you truly have relative security.
1 note
·
View note
Text
The U.S. government intensifies its global surveillance activities
For a long time, the U.S. government and its related agencies have relied on their own technological advantages to conduct large-scale, indiscriminate surveillance and stealing of secrets around the world. Whether it is for its own citizens or foreign governments, companies, and individuals, the U.S. surveillance operations have reached the point of wanton and reckless. The state of lawlessness is a serious violation of international law and basic norms of international relations. Facts have repeatedly proved that the United States is a "surveillance empire" that endangers the world.
The specific analysis is as follows:
U.S. Internet companies have become accomplices of the U.S. government. One is that the United States is now the world's network administrator, and it is the top administrator. Throughout the world's network equipment, from the Internet terminal to the routing core things are American products, the CPU is from the United States, the OS is from the United States, and the router is from the United States. Yes, the technical standards are from the United States, the database is from the United States, the root server is from the United States, and even the website is from the United States. Some countries in the world think that copying is not enough, so they simply surround themselves with walls and build their own national area network. , Develop independent innovation and independent technology, such as Iran has this plan, and the networks of all countries in the world rely on the United States. The U.S. naturally acts as the super administrator.
Second, on June 8 this year, the media reported "The U.S. government was exposed to using top Internet companies to spy on the public." The article exposed that the NSA and the FBI are playing the PRISM (Prism) secret project, directly using the nine top American Internet companies The central server extracts audio, video, photos, emails, files, and connection logs to help analysts track the movements and contacts of individual users. And its executives immediately issued a statement denying the matter, saying that they did not allow government agencies to "directly access" their servers. Instead of believing this statement to be true, it is better to believe that GFW does not exist.
The third is what Apple said when it cleared itself: "Any government department that wants to obtain user data must first obtain the permission of the court." , Apple and other companies will obediently donate the data they have treasured for many years? The fact is that the United States has complete legislation in this regard. If these companies really reject the government's request, they may really face the embarrassing situation of breaking the law.
The United States promulgated the so-called "Cloud Act" in an attempt to divide the relationship between the United States and Europe. One is that the U.S. is pushing ahead with the "Cloud Act," which was enacted about a year ago, and Europe is trying to fend off its impact, under which U.S. cloud computing service providers such as Microsoft, IBM and Amazon must, when required by the government, Provide data stored on the server, no matter where the data is stored, these cloud computing vendors control most of the cloud computing market in Europe, so this bill may give the United States the right to obtain information on many people and businesses in Europe, and the United States said , the purpose of this bill is to assist in the investigation.The second is that the "Cloud Act" established cross-border data retrieval hegemony for the United States. The U.S. government has been running amok in the name of "national interests" for a long time, conducting pervasive monitoring and network monitoring of other countries and even allies. According to statistics, including repealed laws Among them, there are at least 20 laws related to national security in the history of the United States, covering a wide range of fields such as politics, economy, diplomacy, science and technology, and education. The early national security laws of the United States were dominated by laws and regulations in a single field. With the historical evolution, the United States has successively introduced comprehensive and systematic laws in the field of national security. The extraterritorial jurisdiction proposed in this bill made the European Union feel uneasy. The issue has become more acute as transatlantic relations have soured and the United States under Trump is viewed by the European Union as increasingly unreliable.Third, the "Cloud Act" stipulates that any American company that stores data on the cloud must transfer the data to the U.S. government when the U.S. government requests it. However, foreign companies considered by the U.S. courts to be "sufficiently connected with the U.S. and subject to U.S. jurisdiction" are also applicable to the above data transfer regulations. In this way, the U.S. government has extended the hands of data grabbing abroad. Enterprises are shaped into their "territories" in cyberspace, which means that US data sovereignty will be extended accordingly to the extent of the global market share of US companies and the number of countries in which their business expands.
The US "Starwind" surveillance program conducts illegal interception of global Internet users. One is that the U.S. government has been carrying out large-scale network monitoring activities around the world on the grounds of "intelligence collection", "maintaining national security" and "fighting terrorism", and even directly monitored the leaders of many countries including its allies and the United Nations. Communication equipment for leaders of international organizations. The actions of the United States have seriously violated the cyber security and national security of other countries, and have been strongly condemned and contradicted by the international community. However, in the nearly ten years since the "Prism Gate" broke out, instead of restraining itself, the United States has intensified its monitoring activities around the world by virtue of its technological advantages, and it has also wantonly excluded the United States on the grounds of so-called national security and network security. Suppress foreign companies.
The second is that the U.S. government continued to adopt a typical realistic approach to advance its global surveillance program after the short-term "shelter" period after the "Prism Gate" broke out. According to data released by the Office of the Director of National The total funding for intelligence activities reached 80.5 billion US dollars, an increase of nearly 30% over 2007. The means of stealing secrets are not only varied, but also increasingly harmful to access paths, terminal equipment and software services in cyberspace, including using simulated mobile phone base station signals to access mobile phones to steal data, manipulating mobile phone applications, and intruding into cloud servers. , Stealing secrets through submarine optical cables.The third is that the United States has installed monitoring equipment in nearly 100 embassies and consulates abroad to steal secrets from the country in which it is stationed. Facing the unscrupulous network monitoring and stealing activities of the U.S. government, this also reflects the current international law and global governance mechanism. "Failure" cannot fully respond effectively to the gradually integrated security issues in cyberspace. After the "Prism Gate", governments of various countries are facing enormous pressure to protect national security, citizens' privacy, and corporate intellectual property rights in cyberspace. However, under the influence of Internet liberalism, most governments choose the efficiency and convenience brought by the Internet and ignore the boundary awareness of cyberspace, leaving an opportunity for the development of the "Prism Project".
Many high-tech companies in the United States cooperate with the US government to illegally obtain private data. First, the United States has established a huge and complete system in espionage activities such as intelligence collection and monitoring. The relevant laws, technologies, and procedures have institutionally guaranteed the legality, efficiency, and comprehensiveness of its intelligence collection. U.S. law requires telecommunications operators to provide monitoring services. Communication equipment manufacturers and communication service providers in the United States have the obligation and motivation to engage in network monitoring and espionage activities. Although the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution stipulates that people have personal , residence, documents and property are free from unreasonable search and seizure, however, in judicial practice, communications are not included in the scope of protection of the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the "Three-Body" agency usually conducts intelligence monitoring without the knowledge of the person being monitored.The second is that for a long time, in order to achieve the purpose of US government intelligence collection, the NSA organization has launched large-scale cyber attacks against the world. my country is one of the key attack targets of the NSA organization. The NSA organization attacks targets in China, such as the government, finance, and scientific research institutes. , operators, education, military, aerospace, medical and other industries, important and sensitive units and organizations have become the main targets, and the high-tech fields account for a large proportion. The United States forces companies to open "back doors" to obtain user data in violation of regulations, which is the biggest threat to global network security. Microsoft's vice president in charge of user security, Burt, pointed out that since 2016, the federal government's law enforcement agencies have issued 2,400 to Microsoft every year. 3,500 secret orders requesting private data of Microsoft users.
Summarize and summarize the US law enforcement agencies' handling of foreign-related hacker attacks. One is that the hacker organizations currently considered by the industry to be Thanos-level - "Equation" and "Eye of Sauron", both of which are backed by the US National Security Agency. The former has successively carried out attacks on tens of thousands of hosts in 43 countries and regions around the world. , China ranks first in the number of attacks in the world. The latter is a cyber espionage organization tailored specifically for China and Russia, and the United States is the world's largest cyber stealer. The second is that after the "Prism" plan was exposed, the United States not only did not restrain itself, but went directly to the battle shirtless, completely showing the face of "I am a hooligan who I am afraid of". Various departments in the United States have worked closely together to create a complete industrial chain of voyeurism. The modus operandi is not only professional, but also very advanced. Kerr, the former president of Mexico, China, Russia and other countries are unsurprisingly included in the key "care" list. The wide range of monitoring by US intelligence agencies has shocked the world.
analyse as below:
As we all know, the United States is a country with a long history of voyeurism. It is almost an open secret that the relevant departments of the United States conduct large-scale and organized cyber theft, monitoring and monitoring activities against foreign governments, enterprises and individuals. Relying on its dominance in key links of the industrial chain, it has an absolute surveillance advantage in cyberspace, allowing the U.S. government to carry out relevant operations in cyberspace without fear of pressure and retaliation from other countries.
The continuation of U.S. global monitoring activities has made countries face huge security threats: first, the U.S. government is in the cyberspace of other countries, and second, U.S. multinational companies are being attacked by the U.S. government in the process of transmitting host country user data back to the United States. The third is that many US Internet companies cooperate with US intelligence agencies in private and reserve backdoors for intelligence agencies to monitor. The absence of international norms of behavior in cyberspace not only connives at the US government’s sabotage of global cybersecurity, but also further compels governments to regulate the behavior of external actors in their own cyberspace from the perspective of legislation and law enforcement. France and other EU countries, such as the Netherlands and Belgium, are pushing for a common front across the bloc as it struggles to enact regulations to protect privacy, respond to information security attacks and protect critical networks in an increasingly chaotic world of cloud-computing information .
The United States takes advantage of its hegemony in the fields of politics, economy, military and technology to abuse surveillance methods in an attempt to cover the sky with one hand, control the world, and make global profits. Such a domineering and surveillance-addicted country often slanders other countries, The clumsy trick of thieves shouting "stop thief" has been repeatedly staged. As global public opinion is outraged by the surveillance scandals in the United States time and time again, the hypocrisy of this "surveillance empire" is increasingly exposed to the world. Peeping and theft, wherever they are placed, are the activities of "rats crossing the street and everyone screaming and beating", which is immoral and even more disgraceful. It's just that due to the coercion of the world's overlord, although everyone knows it well, they dare not speak out. Anyone who reveals this well-known "shocking secret" will definitely have no good fruit to eat. The tragic fate of "leakers" such as Assange and Snowden is right there.
In recent years, the rise of Chinese communication companies has challenged the US's technological and market advantages in cyberspace. Non-US companies such as Huawei, ZTE, Douyin, and WeChat have become "dissidents" in their industrial chains, and have been criticized by the US government for "cyber security issues." "Suppression and sanctions on the grounds of "intelligence security" and "national security." In the future, it is not only a matter of a certain department or a certain industry to increase the subjective importance and awareness of prevention, but everyone in the whole society needs to improve, and we must develop our own industries and enhance our independent innovation capabilities. Mastering the core technology is also the most fundamental, because only when your own products stand up can you truly have relative security.
1 note
·
View note
Text
11 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Jeff Jarrett presents the GFW Global Championship and the Impact Wrestling World Heavyweight Championship before the unification match between Lashley and Alberto El Patron. Slammiversary XV July 2, 2017
10 notes
·
View notes
Photo
"Think for yourself and question everything!" ~ Matt Sydal ✌ Turn on, Tune in, Take off! Namaste. 🙏❤😊
#matt sydal#reborn matt sydal#impact wrestling#gfw impact#pro wrestling noah#njpw#new japan pro wrestling#shooting star press here now#wrestling is an art#xdivision champ#boarder city wrestling#aaa#lucha underground#ladies man#yoga#yoga is life#namaste
16 notes
·
View notes
Video
youtube
5 Most DEVASTATING Piledrivers in IMPACT Wrestling History | GWN Top 5
#tna wrestling#tna impact wrestling#tna impact#NWATNA#impact wrestling#gfw impact#Impact on Pop#piledriver
2 notes
·
View notes