#general data protection regulation
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
mostlysignssomeportents · 2 years ago
Link
Go back to the top of this article and reread that transcript of Rep. Buddy Carter grilling TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew. Now, Carter is a dunderhead, but he’s dunderheaded in a way that illuminates just how bad COPPA enforcement is, and has been, for 25 long years.
Carter thinks that TikTok is using biometric features to enforce COPPA. He imagines that TikTok is doing some kind of high-tech phrenology to make sure that every user is over 13 (“I find that [you aren’t capturing facial images] hard to believe. It is our understanding that they’re looking at the eyes. How do you determine what age they are then?”).
Chew corrects the Congressdunderhead from Georgia, explaining that TikTok uses “age-gating”: “when you ask the user what age they are.”
That is the industry-wide practice for enforcing COPPA: every user is presented with a tick-box that says “I am over 13.” If they tick that box, the company claims it has satisfied the requirement not to spy on kids.
But if COPPA were meaningfully enforced, companies would simply have to stop spying on everyone, because there are no efficient ways to verify the age of users at the scale needed for general operation of a website.
-How To Make a Child-Safe TikTok: Have you tried not spying on kids?
458 notes · View notes
quotesfrommyreading · 2 years ago
Text
The researchers' scraper was used to determine whether a consent form met GDPR and eDirective requirements. The rules say consent must be explicit. So, for example, users must click a button rather than just hop straight through to the website; all aspects of consent must be equally easy to reject as to accept; and pre-ticked boxes are not allowed. 
Of the 10,000 websites scraped that used a CMP form, the researchers found that implicit consent is present on a third of websites. 
The researchers also found that CMPs make rejecting all tracking – which includes cookies and other techniques like browser and device fingerprinting that Firefox-maker Mozilla is trying to block by default – "substantially more difficult than accepting it". 
Microsoft and Apple are also trying to tackle third-party tracking in their respective Edge and Safari browsers. 
Just over half of websites in the survey don't even offer a 'reject all' button and only 12.6% of sites have a 'reject all' button that is just as easy to access as the 'accept all' button, for example, by placing both options on the same page.  
"Furthermore, when users went to amend specific consent settings rather than accept everything, they are often faced with pre-ticked boxes of the type specifically forbidden by the GDPR," the researchers wrote. 
On top of all this, the researchers – and users too – have no idea whether toggling on or off a specific category of tracking actually produces the intended result for the user. The median number of third-party trackers that data is shared with on sites is a whopping 315 vendors.   
The end result of hiding the 'reject all' option is that people overwhelmingly choose to 'accept all'. 
"The results of our empirical survey of CMPs today illustrates the extent to which illegal practices prevail, with vendors of CMPs turning a blind eye to – or worse, incentivizing – clearly illegal configurations of their systems," the researchers conclude.
  —  Cookie consent: Most websites break law by making it hard to 'reject all' tracking
2 notes · View notes
bmhasdeu · 5 months ago
Text
Regulamentul general privind protecția datelor GDPR
GDPR – General Data Protection Regulation / Regulamentul general privind protecția datelor protejează persoanele fizice atunci când datele lor sunt prelucrate de sectorul privat și de cea mai mare parte a sectorului public. Impulsul pentru confidențialitatea datelor a explodat în ultimii ani, cu reglementări precum Regulamentul general privind protecția datelor (GDPR) al UE și Legea privind…
0 notes
askgaloredigital · 8 months ago
Text
The Real Estate Industry
The homes we live in, the offices we go to, the schools and colleges, the shopping malls, the movie theatres, the hospitals are all intrinsically real estate industries. This industry encompasses a wide range of activities, sectors and stakeholders that are involved in the development, acquisition, management and transaction of properties which includes buying, selling, leasing, financing, and managing residential, commercial, industrial and land properties.
For more visit: https://askgalore.com/revolutionizing-real-estate-ai-ar-vr-technologies
0 notes
londoncompliancesolutions · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Ensure your business meets all regulatory requirements with our top-rated compliance services in London. Contact us today to improve your company's compliance and success.
0 notes
dont-open-dead-inside-25 · 10 months ago
Text
trying to request the data from my reddit profile so i can delete it. does anyone know which option to select? i am unfamiliar with these and don't currently have the time to research them
Tumblr media
1 note · View note
nikhilahuja45 · 10 months ago
Text
The GDPR aims to increase individuals’ access to personal data. This is aimed at standardizing data protection practices across the European Union or EU. The General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR was in effect in 2018. The main aim is to establish standards for businesses to adhere to.
1 note · View note
siscertglobal · 11 months ago
Text
0 notes
iotavenews · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
aiolegalservices · 1 year ago
Text
Ensuring GDPR and DPA Compliance: How AIO Legal Services Supports UK Companies
With the ever-increasing volume of data and the need for robust data protection measures, compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the UK Data Protection Act (DPA) has become paramount for businesses operating in the UK. Non-compliance can lead to severe penalties and reputational damage. To alleviate the complexities of GDPR and DPA compliance, AIO Legal Services offers…
Tumblr media
View On WordPress
0 notes
mostlysignssomeportents · 2 years ago
Link
In 1998, Congress passed the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), which prohibits online service providers from collecting the data of children under the age of 13 without parental consent.
COPPA is remarkable, first because it is one of the very, very few federal privacy guarantees enacted by Congress, an exclusive club whose founding member is the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988, passed by Members of Congress panicked at the thought of video-store clerks leaking their porn rental histories.
But the other remarkable thing about COPPA is how poorly it is enforced.
In this regard, COPPA is very similar to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the EU’s 2016 landmark privacy law. The GDPR has many more moving parts than COPPA, as befits a general data-protection regulation, but at core, the GDPR seeks to incinerate the absurd fiction at the root of commercial surveillance: namely, that we “consent” to commercial surveillance by clicking “I agree” on long, unreadable terms of service.
Under the GDPR, companies that want to collect, sell or process your data need to explain themselves, clearly: they have to tell you what they’re collecting and how they plan on using it.
-How To Make a Child-Safe TikTok: Have you tried not spying on kids?
31 notes · View notes
techinsightshq · 2 years ago
Text
Tumblr media
What are the current frameworks and policies governing AI, providing a comprehensive overview of AI regulations?
The need for rules and frameworks to direct the development and application of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more and more apparent as the field expands and changes. We will give an overview of some of the current frameworks and laws governing AI in this post. The OECD AI Principles are one of the most well-known AI frameworks. These guidelines, created by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), aim to encourage reliable and responsible AI. They include suggestions like ensuring AI systems are open, understandable, and reliable as well as protecting personal information and human rights.
What is OECD AI Principles
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has created a set of rules called the OECD AI Principles to encourage the ethical and responsible creation and application of artificial intelligence (AI). The guidelines, which were approved in May 2019, are meant to serve as a foundation for nations and organizations to create their own AI policies and plans.
The OECD AI Principles consist of five broad principles:
Inclusive growth, sustainable development, and well-being
AI should be designed and developed in a way that promotes inclusive growth, sustainable development, and human well-being.
Fairness and values centered on people
AI should support fairness while respecting people's rights, values, and individual liberty.
Transparency and explain ability 
In order to help users make wise decisions, AI systems should be visible, explainable, and intelligible.
Robustness, security, and safety
To reduce the risks of unexpected outcomes, AI systems should be robust, secure, and safe throughout their life cycles.
Accountability
Those responsible for the design and implementation of AI systems must take responsibility for their choices and behaviors.
More than 40 nations, including the United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom, as well as a number of international organizations have accepted the OECD AI Principles. They are regarded as a crucial point of reference for formulating AI policies and have been employed by various nations to help shape the creation of their respective national AI programmes and policies. In addition to the OECD AI Principles, numerous nations have created their own laws and rules regarding AI. For instance, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), created by the European Union (EU), regulates how personal data is used in AI systems. Additionally, the EU has created the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, which offer a framework for moral AI research and use.
What is the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
In May 2018, the European Union (EU) adopted the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a law governing data privacy. The GDPR intends to improve and harmonise data protection regulations throughout the EU and give people more control over their personal data. Regardless of where the organisation is situated, the GDPR applies to all organisations that gather, handle, or retain personal data of EU citizens. Names, addresses, email addresses, social security numbers, and online identifiers are just a few examples of the many types of personal information it includes. Individuals have the right to access their personal data, ask for its rectification or deletion, and object to its processing under the GDPR. The GDPR also imposes obligations on businesses that handle personal data, such as the need to get individuals' consent before processing their data, put in place the proper organizational and technological safeguards to secure data, and notify the competent authorities of any data breaches within 72 hours. If an organization violates the GDPR, they may be subject to fines of up to €20 million or 4% of its annual global turnover, whichever is higher. The GDPR, which is regarded as a milestone rule for data privacy, has raised attention on data protection and privacy around the globe. Similar restrictions have either been implemented or are being considered by other nations. Regulations concerning AI have also been created in the US. A framework for AI has been created by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which offers instructions for creating reliable and open AI systems. Guidelines for the use of AI in consumer protection have also been released by the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Other nations have also created their own frameworks and rules for AI, like China and Canada. The New Generation Artificial Intelligence Development Plan, which describes China's objectives for the development of AI, was created. The Canadian AI Ethics Framework was created in Canada and offers guidelines for the creation and application of ethical AI. While the necessity for rules and frameworks for AI is becoming more widely acknowledged, so are the difficulties in creating them. Regulations and frameworks must be adaptable enough to take into account new advances because AI is a topic that is developing quickly. Additionally, there are difficulties in international coordination and collaboration since different nations may have different laws and frameworks. In conclusion, frameworks and rules for AI are crucial to ensuring that it is created and applied in a trustworthy and responsible manner. Although there are several frameworks and laws in place right now, the area of artificial intelligence is continuously developing, thus there is a need for ongoing debate and collaboration to make sure that laws and frameworks are still effective.
Learn More about machine learning
1 note · View note
long80llc · 2 years ago
Photo
Tumblr media
The cybersecurity landscape is constantly changing, with new threats and vulnerabilities emerging daily. These changes have created a need for a new type of access management. Adaptive Authentication (AA) is the answer to this need. It provides the security & compliance needed to protect against these evolving threats by adapting to changing conditions in real time.
1 note · View note
frank-olivier · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
The Future of Justice: Navigating the Intersection of AI, Judges, and Human Oversight
One of the main benefits of AI in the justice system is its ability to analyze vast amounts of data and identify patterns that human judges may not notice. For example, the use of AI in the U.S. justice system has led to a significant reduction in the number of misjudgments, as AI-powered tools were able to identify potential biases in the data and make more accurate recommendations.
However, the use of AI in the justice system also raises significant concerns about the role of human judges and the need for oversight. As AI takes on an increasingly important role in decision-making, judges must find the balance between trusting AI and exercising their own judgement. This requires a deep understanding of the technology and its limitations, as well as the ability to critically evaluate the recommendations provided by AI.
The European Union's approach to AI in justice provides a valuable framework for other countries to follow. The EU's framework emphasizes the need for human oversight and accountability and recognizes that AI is a tool that should support judges, not replace them. This approach is reflected in the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which requires AI systems to be transparent, explainable and accountable.
The use of AI in the justice system also comes with its pitfalls. One of the biggest concerns is the possibility of bias in AI-generated recommendations. When AI is trained with skewed data, it can perpetuate and even reinforce existing biases, leading to unfair outcomes. For example, a study by the American Civil Liberties Union found that AI-powered facial recognition systems are more likely to misidentify people of color than white people.
To address these concerns, it is essential to develop and implement robust oversight mechanisms to ensure that AI systems are transparent, explainable and accountable. This includes conducting regular audits and testing of AI systems and providing clear guidelines and regulations for the use of AI in the justice system.
In addition to oversight mechanisms, it is also important to develop and implement education and training programs for judges and other justice professionals. This will enable them to understand the capabilities and limitations of AI, as well as the potential risks and challenges associated with its use. By providing judges with the necessary skills and knowledge, we can ensure that AI is used in a way that supports judges and enhances the fairness and accountability of the justice system.
Human Centric AI - Ethics, Regulation. and Safety (Vilnius University Faculty of Law, October 2024)
youtube
Friday, November 1, 2024
6 notes · View notes
londoncompliancesolutions · 10 months ago
Text
Top 5 Nonprofit Compliance Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
In the quickly changing nonprofit sector, compliance is essential to upholding legality, openness, and confidence. However it can be difficult to navigate the complex web of regulations, and many NGOs unintentionally commit compliance errors that could have detrimental effects. This essay focuses on important keywords like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), financial crime compliance, and the cryptocurrency industry while illuminating the top five nonprofit compliance errors and offering advice on how to prevent them.
Tumblr media
Neglecting GDPR Compliance in Donor Data Handling: One prevalent mistake nonprofits make is overlooking the importance of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) compliance, especially concerning donor data. Nonprofits often collect and store vast amounts of sensitive information, and failure to adhere to GDPR guidelines can result in severe penalties. To avoid this, nonprofits should implement robust data protection policies, secure data storage systems, and seek explicit consent from donors regarding data usage.
Insufficient Financial Crime Compliance Measures: Financial crime compliance is another critical aspect often underestimated by nonprofits. With the rise of online transactions and the use of digital currencies in the crypto market, nonprofits become potential targets for financial crimes. To mitigate this risk, nonprofits should establish thorough financial crime prevention measures, including regular audits, due diligence on financial transactions, and employee training programs. Staying informed about emerging trends in the crypto market is essential to adapt compliance measures accordingly.
Lack of Transparency in Fund Allocation: Transparency is the cornerstone of nonprofit organizations, and a common mistake is the lack of clarity in fund allocation. Donors want to know how their contributions are being utilized, and regulators scrutinize nonprofits for financial transparency. To avoid this mistake, nonprofits should maintain detailed financial records, regularly update stakeholders on fund allocation through transparent reports, and adhere to accounting standards. Clear communication builds trust and helps organizations stay in compliance with regulatory standards.
Inadequate Board Governance and Oversight: Nonprofits often falter when it comes to board governance and oversight. An effective board is crucial for making strategic decisions and ensuring compliance with regulations. Neglecting the establishment of a strong board, or not providing adequate training to board members on compliance matters, can lead to serious mistakes. Nonprofits should invest in board development, conduct regular training sessions on compliance issues, and foster an environment that encourages open communication and accountability.
Ignoring Evolving Compliance Landscape, Especially in the Crypto Market: The crypto market has become a significant player in the financial landscape, and nonprofits engaging in cryptocurrency transactions must stay abreast of the evolving compliance requirements. Ignoring the unique challenges posed by the crypto market can lead to inadvertent non-compliance. Nonprofits should actively monitor regulatory developments, seek legal advice on crypto transactions, and update their compliance protocols to align with the dynamic nature of the digital currency landscape.
To protect their purpose, position in the community, and legal standing, nonprofits need to take the initiative to handle compliance issues. NGO's can reduce risks and improve their efficacy in accomplishing charitable objectives by steering clear of these top five compliance errors and taking proactive steps. In a constantly evolving regulatory landscape, regular training, remaining up to date on modifications to regulations, and cultivating a compliance culture are essential to the success of nonprofit organizations.
0 notes
gdprlaw · 11 days ago
Text
Ensure GDPR Compliance with Gdpr-Law.eu – Your Trusted Data Protection Partner
Stay compliant with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and safeguard your business from legal risks. At Gdpr-Law.eu, we provide expert guidance to simplify GDPR compliance, ensuring data privacy and security for your organization. Trust our proven solutions to stay secure and compliant. Visit Gdpr-Law.eu today!
0 notes