#fuck you broadcom

[reckless-rider]

If I have to put my address in for free software I'm not doing it

[imperiumallaboveall]

Watch "Full Documentary: Dark Web" on YouTube

Wireless it has to be Singapore setup they don't go to broadcom for no reason do you understand? Fuck the relays photonics get what the fucking program yo

[goldmemesachs]

"If Spotify demonstrates that all of the IPO apparatus is unnecessary, then it's a lot easier for future companies to pick and choose what parts of the IPO apparatus they want."

If you are confronted with workers in a rail yard who saw tourists in suits and concluded from that that they should buy call options on their parent company's stock, it is hard not to admire them a little. That's clever! I would be inclined to attribute their profits mostly to cleverness, and only secondarily to inside information. You could imagine a spectrum of insider trading, where if your boss just tells you "we are being acquired" and you trade, then that is cheating and illegal, while if you pick up only subtle clues about an acquisition and use bold leaps of deductive logic to decide to trade, then that is just good old capitalism and perfectly legal.

After Broadcom Ltd.'s bid to acquire Qualcomm Inc. was blocked because the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. concluded that the acquisition by Singapore-incorporated Broadcom would take Qualcomm in a "'private-equity'-style direction" and undermine U.S. national security by reducing investment in wireless technology, the former chairman of Qualcomm, Paul Jacobs, is planning a ... private equity buyout ... backed by a foreign company?

It's fucking Soft Bank, of course.

Banks are constantly experimenting with AI in compliance, in part because they have tons of raw data to sift through to look for compliance problems, and in part because it is easier to convince regulators that you are serious about compliance if there is some actual algorithm that you can point to that is monitoring your behavior. The AI, if it is smart enough, will come up with all sorts of creative ways to spot misbehavior that the average compliance officer, and even the average cheating banker, would never come up with. But if it's even smarter, maybe it will find new ways to cheat.

[itoldyousoucnow]

We Are Building A Dystopia Just to Make People Click On Ads via @tedtalks

You can watch this video and then read this article it will help you put things in perspective on the Industry as whole views you and me.   When I read this article: The End of Net Neutrality Could be Good for Marketers -- And Bad for Almost Everyone Else By   Shelly Palmer. Published on November 22, 2017 via @adage, I could not help myself but to think WHAT A FUCKING CUNT!!!!

http://adage.com/article/opinion/end-net-neutrality-good-advertisers/311399/?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&u

As I am contemplating the idea of starting my own business, which will required me to get an investment from either an Angel Investor or a Venture Capitalist and the way I am planning to structure my business model revenue is based on sponsors and advertisers, this article tone just made me so angry.  To think that I will have to compromise my ethos, principals and values to kiss company’s ass just to have a business while they fuck everyone else over is a none starter for me. I guess I am going to have to have to reconsider my business model, I am not going to kiss any company’s ass for money. I am only willing to work with companies and celebrate what they do only when they prove their commitment to Social Good and real efforts to help those to whom they serve: their customers.  I am not going to be blogging wonderful things about a company who’s glossy beautiful ads promise one thing who behind the curtain is just is destroying everything I have been advocating for.  I am sure not everyone in the industry thinks like fucking Shelly Palmer, but man I will love to see a hashtag #HasShellyPalmerLandedYet. 

This is the summary and the main reasons why I started a blog.  This is why people have been making my life a living fucking hell, because they did not want the truth to come and in an article simply written like this one:   

The End of Net Neutrality Could be Good for Marketers -- And Bad for Almost Everyone Else By   Shelly Palmer. Published on November 22, 2017 via @adage

Yesterday the Federal Communications Commission released its final draft the exceptionally misleadingly titled "Restoring Internet Freedom" order. The FCC announced a December 14 vote on the order, which would do the opposite of restoring anything resembling freedom. The federal agency wants to vote to repeal the current net neutrality rules which were enacted to ensure that Americans would have equal access to the internet.

If you're reading this, chances are you're already interested in the topic. Still, some quick background:

Renamed "Open Internet" a while back, net neutrality provided a regulatory framework that specifically prohibited:

Blocking: Broadband providers may not block access to lawful content, applications, services or non-harmful devices.

Throttling: Broadband providers may not deliberately target some lawful internet traffic to be delivered to users more slowly than other traffic.

Paid prioritization: Broadband providers may not favor some internet traffic in exchange for consideration of any kind. Internet service providers are also banned from prioritizing content and services of their affiliates.

In its place the FCC is proposing to "Restore Internet Freedom" as follows:

Reinstate the "information service" classification of broadband internet access service first established on a bipartisan basis during the Clinton Administration.

Restore the determination that mobile broadband is not a "commercial mobile service" subject to heavy-handed regulation.

Restore the authority of the nation's most experienced cop on the privacy beat – the Federal Trade Commission – to police the privacy practices of ISPs.

What it means for agencies, advertisers and marketers We'll get to the winners and losers below -- and there will be plenty of each -- but as something of a silver lining, this regulatory shift would open up a wide-range of opportunities for agencies, advertisers and marketers. This could be a perfect opportunity to pair programmatic creative with programmatic media buying. There will be hundreds of different rate plans targeted at specific cohorts. There will also be opportunities to create new consumer and brand experiences that include "unlimited" bandwidth or "free" bandwidth offers.

The restoration of this version of "internet freedom" will change the media distribution landscape dramatically. It will be the perfect place for new creative ad units and offers. Think about how your brand can be positioned as a trusted, needed, content companion. It's an unintended consequence, but the FCC is about to give a lot of smart marketers an opportunity to shine.

About those winners and losers, though: this is where the silver lining begins to tarnish.

Winners Big internet service providers and wireless carriers such as Comcast, Verizon, AT&T, etc., come out on top. The bigger you are, the happier this makes you. These organizations will be able to craft any kind of data packages that the market will bear. They will be able to throttle bandwidth, lie about unlimited plans, favor big payer or affiliate partner traffic over competitive traffic. (Imagine Comcast favoring Xfinity over Netflix or throttling down your bandwidth if you were watching Star Trek: Discovery on CBS All Access.) Pricing will not be market driven; most ISPs are de facto monopolies in their specific territories.

Alcatel-Lucent, Broadcom, Cisco, Corning, Ericsson, IBM, Intel, Nokia Solutions and Networks, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Qualcomm and 50-plus other tech companies who signed the original letter against Title II (which the FCC is planning to repeal as well) also come out on top. As do lawyers, especially attorneys for… well, just about everybody involved.

Losers Netflix and every other content provider. The goal of net neutrality was to ensure that Comcast did not favor delivery of its own content over competitive content such as Netflix. Or Amazon. Or Hulu. Content providers who do not own their own distribution are now at serious risk.

The list of losers is long: Dropbox, Ebay, Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Vonage Holdings Corp., Yahoo! Inc. and about 150 other companies that signed this letter in favor of net neutrality are among them. Less friction for consumers means better business for big tech. Although, it will be interesting to see whether or not big tech likes this particular recipe for restoring internet freedom. They may.

Small businesses and start-ups. If you can't afford high-speed bandwidth, too bad. If your start-up uses lots of data, or its new augmented reality app requires consumers to have access to enough bandwidth to use it, too bad. If fill-in-the-blank needs equal access to the internet, too bad. If your online service competes with an online service that the big telecoms or ISPs favor, too bad.

You. If you're a normal person and you want access to the internet, get ready for all kinds of airline industry-style charges. You'll either accept a slower connection or pay extra for going over a threshold on your unlimited data plan. In practice, you're likely to get amazing speed and service for video content you don't care about and terrible service while trying to use the things you really want. The solution … pay more.

A few closing thoughts I am not advocating for any specific type of government involvement with the internet. I think government has proven that it has no business being in any business. But I believe we should govern America for the best possible GDP (as opposed to governing to enrich a big few big corporations). Al Gore may not have invented the internet, but his metaphor about it being an information super-highway was pretty good. Imagine an America where a private company could close the left-lane of I-95 between NY and Hartford because they didn't have the money to maintain it, or worse, wanted to use it for themselves and their friends. How would that affect commerce on the I-95 corridor?

Our world is digital – all digital. To make the most of it, my delivery truck and your delivery truck should have equal access to the same highway system and connecting roads. Just like we do in the physical world. Lastly, this is a huge topic that will impact every person in the United States. It's worth some of your time to go a bit deeper and to decide for yourself how the "Restoring Internet Freedom" act is going to change your life – because it absolutely will.

[rvarchivo]

Shit keeps coming...

Nvidia sucks and I'm sick of it

Published 2017-10-26 on Drew DeVault's blog https://drewdevault.com/2017/10/26/Fuck-you-nvidia.html

> (...) When people complain to me about the lack of Nvidia support in Sway, I get really pissed off. It is not my fucking problem to support Nvidia, it’s Nvidia’s fucking problem to support me. Even Broadcom, fucking Broadcom, supports the appropriate kernel APIs. And proprietary driver users have the gall to reward Nvidia for their behavior by giving them hundreds of dollars for their GPUs, then come to me and ask me to deal with their bullshit for free. Well, fuck you, too. Nvidia users are shitty consumers and I don’t even want them in my userbase. Choose hardware that supports your software, not the other way around. (...)

#Nvidia #NvidiaFuckYou #NvidiaSucks #Proprietary #drivers #Nouveau #GeForce #GPU #DGP #Video #FreeSoftware #support #Sway #API #EGLStreams #Wayland

original post

[imperiumallaboveall]

Hey let's go rock climbing cut their fucking ropes as a movie backpacking inside tent outside tent when they Leak with outside person if it's a female just take care of their Partners there needs to be a person monitoring these motherfuckers and allowing them and you feel as this is acceptable over 10 billion years you know it's not immediately cut the seat

Watch "전국 시청률 1위 '동백꽃필무렵'ㅣ드라마 몰아보기" on YouTube

You're getting excited for me so Trace back to you Megyn Kelly and out that poorly Fox News and up to Tucker Carlson getting whacked no he's going to be protected if he does so come back to exactly the same point at any time you chooses I can make a decision and having weight little bit until this blows over here VFX primary