#for some reason i am currently a bit put off by contemporary literature | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

beccaislearning · 5 years ago

Text

Self isolating: A guide for the bewildered.

It seems that we’re now at that awful point where we’re having to balance utter panic with pragmatism: not to take the Corona outbreak so seriously that we oscillate between being immobilised and panic buying, but yet also to be pragmatic about what we can do. To crack on with a real and difficult situation, where the stakes are potentially very high for us and those we love, and even for those we don’t love so much.

Self isolating scares me. The cut off from productivity and agency I think are my two biggest fears. Of course there’s being cut off from people, but for me I know that I worry more about the dependency that self-isolation conversely requires, especially in a new city.

For me, it’s hard not to wrestle with all these ideas in light of ME. Lately I’ve been feeling like an 83 year old in a 33 year old’s body. Viruses are scary for the already chronically ill, because they represent a great shove down the mountain we’ve been working so hard at dragging ourselves up for years. And yet, as I wrestle, as I start talking to friends who are already self-isolating, it strikes me that I may also have some tools stored up for times such as these. I am, in fact, an expert at being housebound. This should go on my CV.

So here, is some public service blogging. Some tips for those who are novice at being ill and endlessly in the company of one.

Tip 1: Embrace it, don’t fight it.

You get to choose your attitude. There is a lot to resist or fear, and yet this will not change the situation, nor will it make any self isolation go quicker. So much of solitude and illness is a mental battle alongside a physical one, and so in grace and zen-like peaceability welcome this time with kindness. See what you might learn from it. Accept the unwanted gift of slowing down. Recognise that is will be tough, but know that it might also be rich.

Tip 2: Podcasts and audiobooks.

Sometimes our minds are just too busy fighting their anxious battles to get them to be reasonable. In these times, and in times that I’ve found myself too poorly to watch TV or read, a gentle listen to something provides enough distraction for your busy tired brain whilst still allowing you to be horizontal with closed eyes.

My recommendations? Audiobooks-wise, I’ve loved listening to some classic literature that would take me a lot longer to get around to reading otherwise: the rather apt ‘100 Years of Solitude’ and ‘Love in a Time of Cholera’ by Gabriel Garcia Marquez have been highlights! More contemporary novels I’ve enjoyed lately are Ann Patchett’s ‘The Dutch House’ (read by Tom Hanks), Taffy Brodesser-Akner’s ‘Fleishman is in Trouble’, or good non-fiction by David Sedaris or Michelle Obama’s ‘Becoming’ which are all the more brilliant for being read by the authors themselves.

My podcasts recommendations are thus:

Everyone, start with the ‘Fortunately’ podcast with Fi Glover and Jane Garvey. Two brilliant friends having meandering and intellectually subversive conversation. It will be a good substitute for going for a coffee with your own besties.

For those who are especially anxious: listen to the Robcast (Rob Bell’s podcast). He will refocus you on things above and draw you closer to God. I binge listen to this in my own times of illness and crisis, and never get left in that same place by the end of a podcast. Similarly with Krista Tippett’s ‘On Being’ podcast, which not about overtly Christian spirituality for those who prefer that! (Though many Christians may claim that about Rob Bell).

Elizabeth Day’s ‘How to Fail’ for some gentle wisdom, ‘Reasons to be Cheerful’ with Ed Miliband and Geoff Lloyd for some positive political commentary, ‘Literary Fiction’ for book lovers, and ‘The Guilty Feminist’ for feminism with a good range of comedic voices. Also worth listening to Dolly Alderton’s ‘Love Stories’ podcast which isn’t current, but has the most beautiful back catalogue of interviews about love.

For foodies: ‘Out to Lunch’ with Jay Rayner, ‘The Kitchen Cabinet’ and the ‘Off Menu’ podcast with Ed Gamble James Acaster (the Victoria Coren-Mitchell episode is one of my most re-listened to).

For those with an ‘offbeat’ sense of humour I liberally recommend the ‘Beef and Dairy Network Podcast’ and suggest that you start with episodes that feature the Beef Poet Laureate, Michael Banyan.

Also, binge watching TV helps, but in my experience it is good to make sure you have time away from screens. It somehow lifts you to look away a bit.

Tip 3: TREATS

Surround yourself with gentle things that make you smile. For me? Lovely moisturisers, great smelling candles, poached eggs on toast, clean bedsheets, animals on the internet, good pyjamas, beautiful mugs, chocolate Brazil nuts, and overflowing bowls of satsumas.

Tip 4: This too shall pass.

When you’re ill and isolated, you can lose all sense of time and perspective. There will be times when everything feels endlessly awful. In these times, remind yourself that this too will pass. This isn’t forever, summer is coming, and at some point Corona virus will feel as historic as swine flu. And hopefully that will fortify you.

The spiritual stuff:

Finally a word from wisdom in the Christian tradition. Feel free to stop reading. here, if this isn’t for you.

I am learning, slowly, and at times reluctantly, that the greatest gift throughout suffering is to worship. I think of Paul and Silas, unfairly imprisoned and worshiping in their cell, not knowing when or if they will be released from the futility and fear of it all. As they worship, the walls come down, and yet the stay where they are for the sake of the safety of their prison guard. It turns out that even though they were imprisoned, they were truly free with or without the walls.

Or as Anne Lamott puts it: “Look up! My pastor says you can trap bees on floor of jars without lids because they don't look up. They just walk around and bump into glass. So look up. We're free”

I do not share this tritely, though there will have been times where people who dared tell me to worship in my greatest suffering would have been at huge risk of thumping (had I the strength). Worship refocuses our whole selves on where it is we put our hope, and that changes everything.

1 note · View note

saintmachina · 6 years ago

Note

I’m currently freaking out over being told that my math grades will make it difficult for me to get into college, but also that taking easier math classes will make it difficult for me to get into college. I don’t know what to do, and I feel like I might not get into college or have a future. Since you are a certified Adult™️ with an Actual Corporate Job™️, I was hoping for some of your words of wisdom? Maybe, possibly, pretty please?

Hello friend! I am but a humble bog goblin toting around two expensive degrees in a bucket and smearing colors onto my face every morning in the hopes that my Corporate Overlords will not realize I am a Child in a blazer, but I can do my best!

Listen, I don’t know what degree program you have in mind, but grades, especially individual grades, do not impact your overall college application undully, especially if those lackluster individual grades are not in the subject you want to major in. So take a breath. Apps are weighed holistically. Admissions boards will look at your grades, resume, admission essays, test scores, letters of rec, and any other materials you provide as a whole. Unless you’re applying to law school, one test score is not going to knock you out of the running, and some scattered bad grades in an otherwise seaworthy GPA is not going to make everyone reject you.

That said, its great if you can keep Fs and Ds off transcripts. But everyone has subjects they’re poor in. I under-performed in math and foreign languages my entire school career and it didn’t stop me from getting into a public BA program and private psuedo-ivy Masters program. Reader, teachers have threatened to hold me back because of my math grades since I was in kindergarten, but I just kept outperforming everyone in literature and composition and crying my way through my second try of Algebra 1 and I emerged unscathed.

In regards to choosing coursework, I am, once again, unaware of your specific circumstances, but I advocate choosing courses you’re reasonably certain you can perform adequately in. You don’t have to be enrolled in AP and Honors for every class, and if doing so is gonna fuck up your GPA and give you anxiety, nix those classes. Focus on doing the best in what you’re good at and would like to be better in, work yourself up to a sturdy mediocre in your poor classes, and put your nervous application energy into your essays.

Also I am beholden to tell you that college is a little bit of Scam and also a little bit of Amazing and you should always, always choose the academic path that suits the most of your needs as possible. A degree is a near-necessary tool to have in your arsenal when it comes to getting a job, but most of the other tools (self-taught job skills, internships, personal connections, and interviewing and negotiating skills) have nothing to do with your major. My coursework might have helped me get my publishing job, but my job experience probably did more, and I’ve never taken a course in publishing specifically. I got my ghostwriting job and publishing contracts through applying and submitting until someone paid me, and while my creative writing courses helped make me a better writing, most of my contemporaries don’t have any under their belt. Leverage everything about your college degree to serve you at all times, including where you apply.

Tl:dr: You’re gonna be fine, babe. Make the choice that suits your needs best in the moment, do your best to rehab any super low marks, and shore up the rest of your application to help gloss over the weak spots. You’re gonna do great.

#college applications #college advice #appblr #studyblr #people of the page #Anonymous

9 notes · View notes

rixmatthews-blog · 5 years ago

Text

Adeste+ Lisbon 2019 - Day 1

Apology in advance: some of the Portuguese names of places don’t have the correct accents above them as I couldn’t work out how to do this on my mac. I’ve tried, I promise. Not just being lazy. If you’ll forgive me for this, then enjoy the below. Thank you.

---

After a lovely weekend exploring the beautiful Lisbon (my first time here but it certainly won’t be my last) walking many miles and drinking more than one glass of port, it was with a sense of excitement, anxiety and anticipation that I started the Adeste+ Summer School today, defined on the literature as “a programme aimed at expanding cultural participation by bringing the audience to the centre of cultural organisations.”

With a cup of strong black coffee (quietly reminding myself how hard it is to walk and drink at the same time…), a notebook, my laptop, a socially unacceptable quantity of unusable pens, a broken umbrella and very little else - certainly no real sense of what to expect or the format of the week ahead of me - I arrived at the São Luiz Teatro in the centre of Lisbon, a beautiful theatre in the heart of the city celebrating its 125th birthday this year, owned and funded by “the municipality” (the city).

After meeting some of the other lovely delegates (over a welcome coffee and delicious pastry or two) from Italy, Croatia, Spain, The Azores, Amsterdam and Poland to name but a few, we were taken into the main auditorium. Having thought “ok this is all going to be ok - I’m going to quite enjoy this”, my earlier anxiety very quickly re-surfaced when Aida Tavares, the Artistic Director announced that this seemingly traditional 700-seat three-tiered proscenium theatre (think Lyric Hammersmith, Apollo Shaftesbury Avenue or The Old Vic) would be the perfect place for us to make our presentations. Presentation? sorry did I just hear PRESENTATION? WHAT PRESENTATION? SHIT! WHAT DID I MISS? WHAT EMAIL DIDN’T I READ PROPERLY!?

(Breathe Richard, breathe).

It quickly transpired that all that was meant by “presentation” was to introduce ourselves by name and organisation - much more in-line with my level of preparation. Phew. Ok this - THIS - I can deal with.

We found out more about the theatre in which we were sat - and in the best possible way - it quickly became clear that it was much less traditional than its architecture; EVERY production they programme in the main house has relaxed, audio described and sign-interpreted performances; the Artistic Directors of all the theatres across Lisbon work together and collaboratively as one eco-system working together for the same audience; as well as the main auditorium, there is also a 100-seater black box space in the basement which programmes for young audiences and families; unlike a recent season announced at our National Theatre in London, their current season has seen work from 30 women and 11 men; their ticket prices are incredibly accessible - top price in the main house is €17, and an annual subscription for €10 means customers get 50% off. Prices in the black box are €3 for first-time attenders. Move me to Lisbon now.

We also heard about a fascinating, innovative and frankly quite genius project which I LOVE called “The audience receives” from an independent theatre company who were working with the venue to develop audiences from “positive non-attenders” (e.g. people who are already warmed-up to the idea of going to the theatre, but for whatever reason don’t actually go). The idea of the project is to give members of the public not only cultural access, but also cultural governance. Participants are worked with on a long-term basis - 2 years. Within year 1, participants go to rehearsals, meet artistic teams, see shows and discuss them afterwards through focus groups. Within the second year, participants are actually handed the venue - they sell tickets at the box office, they work backstage, and ultimately they programme the theatre. I really love this. It reminded me that effective audience development isn’t a quick process, it needs real time and investment (in this case 2 years) and it needs genuine and authentic buy in and a passion to make it work across the whole organisation.

For the afternoon - which is also where we will be based for the rest of the week - we headed to the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation just outside of the city centre, a brutalist complex in a style similar to the Barbican in London, surrounded by beautiful gardens and, even better, with at least one lovely cafe selling wine (it’s just a fact - before you judge, I was very good and self-restrained. I can’t be falling asleep in the afternoon session now can I).

The afternoon session kicked off with some introductions, and a keynote speech from the brilliant Anne Torreggiani, CEO of The Audience Agency (partners on Adeste+), and it was also great to see other Audience Agency peeps again Penny Mills and Jonathan Goodacre (who I’ve worked with on various projects in the past).

Some of the thinking and methodologies behind the programme/Summer School were explained, primarily a “Design Thinking” approach to audience development. This was totally new to me, but it basically means trying by doing - or “protyping” - making mistakes and learning from mistakes - and ultimately putting the audience member first: asking their opinion, involving them and learning from them. (There’s other stuff to, I’ll expand on this in later posts as this one is far too long already). Although “Design Thinking Audience Development” is a bit of a fancy term, I totally endorse all these ways of working, and while colleagues, friends and family throughout my career and life have reassured me that it’s ok to make mistakes (and I’ve never quite 100% believed them - sorry everyone, nothing personal) it’s really refreshing to hear this in a very formal and academic setting.

We also heard some case studies from a couple of other arts organisations in Lisbon with a brilliant audience development ethos at their heart - including Teatro Luis de Camoes (affectionatley known as LU.CA) which is a theatre producing brilliant work for children and young people, and Carpintaris S. Lazaro, a new contemporary arts centre.

So that was Day 1. I met a lot of lovely people and took in a lot, not all of which I’ve properly absorbed yet, but once it’s downloaded from my brain it will probably appear in this blog. After the lectures and seminars had finished, I had a walk around the beautiful Gulbenkian grounds, I met an elderly cat, and I met a duck, who was resting its beak on the footpath (seemed like a perfectly reasonable thing to do). Both are pictured below. I spoke to my wonderful partner Olivier, and I remembered how lucky I am to work for Graeae, and to work with colleagues who I can also call friends.

All in all a great start to the week. Bring on day 2. NOW for wine.

#adeste

1 note · View note

camwritesbooks · 6 years ago

Text

my twenty-eighteen reading recap ♥

inspired by @brynwrites reading recap, here is my reading recap of twenty-eighteen, sorry it’s a bit late! I read quite a few books in the past year, but here are my top five of the past twelve months. feel free to comment or make your own post of what you enjoyed reading in twenty-eighteen!

one. the diviners by libba bray (★★★★★)

this series is my new favourite and honestly I haven’t read many things for original, clever and well-written as these books in a long time. I’m currently reading lair of dreams, the sequel to the first (which bears the same name as the overall series). the diviners is about, among many other characters, evie o’neil, a magically-gifted young american girl in the 1920s who is sent to live with her uncle in new york. then the murders start happening. the characters of this series are all so beautiful and developed and libba bray has clearly put such a great effort into making her series diverse and researching different cultures. I think it’s best to go into this book not knowing too much? so... words to describe this book: thriller, paranormal, historical, a bit scary, mystery.

two. radio silence by alice oseman (★★★★★)

I haven’t heard too many people talk about this book? which I think is a shame, because it’s so good. describing it is difficult because it’s so unlike anything I’ve read before and do think it’s best to go into this book knowing as little as possible. but here’s what I’ll say: frances is a girl living in the uk with one goal in life - do brilliantly in school and get into a prestigious university. it always seemed achievable until her life begins to fall apart. radio silence is about being yourself, and it’s done in such a powerful way that I can’t help but love it. words to describe it: living your truth, diversity, contemporary, podcast, alternative style.

three. warcross by marie lu (★★★★★)

there’s a reason this book is so popular, it’s pretty freaking good. I’ll admit that I hesitated to pick it up because it was pretty far from my comfort zone in terms of genres. futuristic stuff about new technologies, etc. is not the sort of thing I usually read. emika chen is a bounty hunter and a hacker. desperate for money, she takes a risks and hacks in the biggest online international event of the year - the world championships of the virtual reality game that took the world by storm ten years ago and hasn’t stopped. however she accidentally hacks herself into the game. this gains the attention of Warcross’ creator, young billionaire hideo tanaka. he wants her to enter the official games to act as his personal spy. it’s not a long book, which is a breath of fresh air among all these five hundred to seven hundred (and even longer) page books and I thoroughly enjoyed it. I’m planning to read the sequel, wildcard, soon! words to describe it: sci-fi, futuristic, surprising, virtual reality, strong protagonist.

four. the nowhere girls by amy reed (★★★★★)

I have read contemporary young adult books about feminism before. they have been everywhere from painfully terrible to begrudgingly decent. but never that good. certainly never amazing as this book is. the nowhere girls tells the stories of many girls living in the town in which it’s set, but focuses on three - grace, the quiet but kind new girl; rosina, the queer, alternative girl who struggles to fit in with her conservative mexican family and school and erin, the star trek-obsessed girl with autism unable to find her place. together, they join together to find justice for lucy moynihan, a girl who was run out of town after accusing a group of popular boys of gang rape. this book is so powerful. I think honestly that all girls old enough should read it, it’s so important. amy reed has put such an effort in representing all kinds of girls, including queer girls, trans girls, girls of many races and social classes, etc. it’s honestly stunning and I can’t recommend it enough, honestly. words to describe it: feminism, empowerment, personal stories, justice.

(I have to mention though that there is a strong trigger warning for rape, sexual assault/harassment, etc. in this book, please look after yourself.)

five. strange the dreamer by laini taylor (★★★★ ½ )

the sequel to this novel, muse of nightmares, came out quite recently and I can’t wait to read it! why? because this book is like nothing i’ve read before, and it’s beautiful. strange the dreamer is a very difficult book to describe. it’s fantasy and it’s strange, different from most books like it. it’s very explorative of the genre and doesn’t hold back from pushing the boundaries. like radio silence, I think this is a book you need to go in a bit blind. but here’s the basic plot: lazlo strange has devoted his life to studying the mysterious city of Weep, which disappeared years ago along with its true name. one day, he is given a chance to travel there and learn its secrets. words to describe it: high fantasy, strange and alternative, mysterious, a touch of romance.

honourable mentions (★★★★) ↴

an ember in the ashes series by sabaa tahir. the first book starts off shaky but by the third installment the series knows where it’s going and the characters have become strong (helen, I’d die for you)

wolf by wolf duology by ryan graudin. this duology is “what if the nazis won?” done right, with heartbreaking moments and powerful characters.

aristotle and dante discover the secrets of the universe by benjamin alire sáenz. yes, I finally read this book. I’m aware how late I am. but this novel was truly beautiful and definitely deserving of the hype.

simon vs. the homo sapiens agenda by becky albertalli. you all know this one. the book is funny and tearjerking and a really lovely read.

they both die at the end by adam silvera. don’t let the title put you off, this book isn’t all sad. I won’t spoil anything though.

children of blood and bone by tomi adeyemi. although this book isn’t perfect, it is a beautiful example of own voices literature and I cried inwardly so much while reading it.

we are the ants by shaun david hutchinson. although I found it hard to connect with the protagonist’s outlook on the world, I feel I learned a new perspective from this novel and was completely hooked beginning to end.

a very large expanse of sea by tahereh mafi. another gorgeous own voices read, this book is about shirin, a muslim girl, growing up in the aftermath of 9/11.

so yeah! that was my favourite books of twenty-eighteen, I read some really lovely ones this past year. happy reading in twenty-nineteen, folks ♡

#i would recommend all these books #though some are quick genre specific so if you arent into that thing you might no enjoy it #but anyway #what did you guys enjoy reading this year?#twenty-eighteen reading recap #books #rape tw #queue #sorry if there are typos i did my best :(

26 notes · View notes

dillydedalus · 5 years ago

Text

what i read in july

THAT’S MORE LIKE IT aka i’m finally out of the (relative) reading slump for good & my bro james joyce was there

men explain things to me, rebecca solnit the original mansplaining essay is great, and still scarily relevant; the others in this collection (most on feminist issues) are also quite good; some aspects are a bit dated & problematic so be aware of that. 2.5/5

erschlagt die armen!, shumona sinha (tr. from french, not available in english) short but very impactful novella about a young french woman, originally from india, who works as an interpreter in the asylum system and becomes more & more broken by this system of inhumane bureaucracy and suffering, until she snaps and hits a migrant over the head with a wine bottle. full of alienation and misery and beautiful but disturbing language - the title translates to ‘beat the poor to death’ so like. yeah. 3.5/5

fire & blood: a history of the targaryen family I, george r r martin look, it’s a 700-page-long fake history book about a fictional ruling dynasty in a fictional world, and i’m just That Obsessed & Desperate about asoiaf (and i don’t even care about the targs That Much). anyway, now i know more about the targs than any ruling family from, you know, real history, which is like, whatever. this is pretty enjoyable if you are That Obsessed, although i will say that some bits are much better than others (there are some dry dull years even in everyone’s fav overly dramatic dragon-riding incest-loving family) and the misogyny really is. a lot. too much. way too much. BUT i did really like Good Best Queen Alysanne (her husband king joe harris is alright too i guess) and i found my new westerosi otp, cregan stark/aly blackwood, who both have Big Dick Energy off the fucking charts. 3.5/5 (+0.5 points for cregan and aly’s combined BDE)

the old drift, namwali serpell hugely ambitious sprawling postcolonial nation-building novel about zambia, told thru three generations of three families, as well as a chorus of mosquitoes (consistently the best & smartest parts). there is A LOT going on, in terms of characters, of plot points, of references to history (the zambian space programme) and literature (finally my knowledge of heart of darkness paid off) and thematically, and honestly it was a bit too much, a bit too tangled & fragmented & drifty, and in the end i probably admire this book more than i liked it, but serpell’s writing is incredibly smart and funny and full of electrical sparks 3.5/5

a severed head, iris murdoch the original love dodecahedron (not that i counted). iris murdoch is fucking WILD and i love her for it. this is a strange darkly funny little farce about some rich well-educated londoners and their bizarre & rather convoluted love lives. not as grandiosely wild as the sea the sea, but fun nevertheless. 3/5

midnight in chernobyl, adam higginbotham jumping on the hype bandwagon caused by the hbo series (very weird to call the current fascination with chernobyl a hype bandwagon but you know). interesting & well-written & accessible (tho the science is still totally beyond me) & gets you to care about the people involved. lots of human failure, lots of human greatness, set against the background of the almost eldritch threat of radioactivity (look up the elephant foot & see if you don’t get chills), and acute radiation syndrome which is THE MOST TERRIFYING THING ON EARTH . 3.5/5

normal people, sally rooney honestly this is incredibly engrossing & absorbing once you get used to how rooney completely ignores ‘show don’t tell’ (it works!), i pretty much read the whole thing in one slow workday (boss makes a dollar, i make a dime so i read books on my phone on company time, also i genuinely had nothing to do). i also think rooney is really good at precisely capturing the ~millenial experience in a way that feels very true, especially the transition from school to uni. BUT i really disliked the ending, the book never engages with the political themes it introduces (esp. class and gender) as deeply as it could and the bdsm stuff never really gets TIED UP LOL. so overall idk: 3.5/5

störfall: nachrichten eines tages, christa wolf quiet reflective undramatic little book narrated by a woman waiting to hear about the outcome of her brother’s brain surgery on the day of the catastrophe at chernobyl - throughout the day she puts down her thoughts about her brother and the events unfolding at chernobyl, as well as the double uncertainty she is trying to cope with. really interesting to read such an immediate reaction to chernobyl (the book came out less than a year after chernobyl). 2.5/5

the man in the high castle, philip k dick it was fine? quick & entertaining alternative history where the axis powers win the war, some interesting bits of worldbuilding (like the draining of the mediterranean which was apparently a real idea in the early 20th century?) but overall it’s just felt a bit disjointed & unsatisfying to me. 2.5/5

fugitive pieces, anne michaels very poetic & thoughtful novel about the holocaust, grief, remembrance & the difference between history and memory, intergenerational trauma, love, geology and the weather. i’m not sure how much this comes together as a novel, but it is absolutely beautifully written (the author is a poet as well) and very affective. 3.5/5

american innovations, rivka galchen short collection of bizarre & often funny short stories about neurotic women whose furniture flies away, or who grow an extra breast, or who are maybe too occupied with financial details. very vague & very precise at once, which seems to be the thing with these sort of collections. 3/5

fool’s assassin (fitz & the fool #1), robin hobb YAASS i’m back in the realm of the elderlings!!! i thought this was one of the weaker installments in the series - i still enjoyed it a lot, and Feelings were had, but it just doesn’t quite fit together pacing-wise & some of the characterisation struck me as off (can i get some nuance for shun & lant please?) and tbh fitz is at peak Selfcentred Dumbass Levels & it drove me up the fucking wall. molly, nettle & bee deserve better. still, completely HYPE for the rest of the trilogy. 3.5/5

JAMES JOYCE JULY

note: i decided not to read dubliners bc it’s my least fav of joyce’s major works & too bleak & repetitive for my mood right now AND while i planned not to reread finnegans wake bc……. it’s finnegans wake…. i kinda do want to read it now (but i also. really don’t.) so idk yet.

a portrait of the artist as a young man, james joyce y’all. i read this book at least once a year between the ages of 15 and 19, it’s beyond formative, it is burnt into my brain, and reading it now several years later it is still everything, soaring and searing (that searing clarity of truth, thanks burgess) and poetic and dirty, and stephen is baby, and a pretentious self-important little prick and i love him & i am him (or was him as only a pretentious self-important teenage girl reading joyce can be him - because this truly is a book that should be read in your late teens when you feel everything as intensely and world-endingly and severely as my boy stephen does and every new experience feels like the world changing). anyway i love this book & i love stephen dedalus, bird-like, hawk-like, knife-blade, aloof, alienated, severe and stern, a poet-priest-prophet if he could ever get over himself, baby baby baby. 5/5

exiles, james joyce well. there’s a reason joyce is known as a novelist. this is….. a failed experiment, maybe. a fairly boring play about an adulterous love-square and uh… love beyond morality and possession maybe??? about how much it would suck for joyce to return to ireland??? and tbh it’s not terribly interesting. 2/5

travesties, tom stoppard a wild funny irreverent & smart antic comedy inspired by the fact that during ww1, james joyce, lenin, and dadaist tristan tzara were all in neutral zurich, more or less simultaneously; they probably never met, but in this play they do, as dadaist poetry, socialist art critique, and a james joyce high on his own genius & in desperate need of some cash while writing ulysses, AND the importance of being earnest (joyce is putting on a production of it) all collide in the memories of henry carr, who played algernon & later sued joyce over money (tru facts). not my fav stoppard (that’s arcadia) but it’s funny & fizzy & smart & combines many many things that i love. 4/5

ulysses, james joyce look i’m not really going to tell y’all anything new about ulysses, but it really has everything, it’s warm & human(e) & cerebral & difficult & funny & sad & healing & i always get a lot out of it even tho there’s bits (a lot of them) i’ll never wrap my head around. ultimate affirmation of humanity or whatever. also stephen dedalus is baby. 5/5

dedalus, chris mccabe the fact that this book (sequel to ulysses about what stephen dedalus might have done the next day) exists and was published ON MY BIRTHDAY is proof that the universe loves me.

anyway this is very very good, very very clever, extremely good at stephen (less good at bloom but his parts are still good), engages w/ ulysses, portrait & hamlet (& others) very cleverly & does some cool meta and experimental shit. y’all it has stephen talking to a contemporary therapist about how he’s stuck in joyce’s text which is all about joyce & very little about whoever stephen is when he’s not joyce’s alter ego/affectionate but slightly amused look at younger self and ithaca is an interview w/ the author about how his relationship to his dad influenced his response to ulysses and I’M INTO IT. the oxen of the sun chapter replaces the whole ‘gestation of english prose’ w/ just slightly rewriting the first pages of about 10 novels published between ulysses and now & it does lolita w/ “bloom, thorn of stephen’s sleep, light in his eyes. his sire, his son’ and i lit. screamed. anyway i don’t want to give this 5 stars (yet) bc i think some of the experimental stuff ended up a bit gimmicky & didn’t add that much to the text but fuck. that’s my boy & i want to reread it right now. 4.5/5 ALSO it’s a crime no literary weirdo woman has written ‘a portrait of the artist’s sister’ about delia ‘dilly’ dedalus, shadow of stephen’s mind, quick far & daring, teaching herself french from a 3rd hand primer while her father drinks the nonexistent family fortune away and her older brother is getting drunk on a beach & starting fights w/ soldiers bc he’s a smartarse

#the books i read #long post

1 note · View note

magpiefngrl · 6 years ago

Note

17) if you could give your fledgling author self any advice, what would it be?

Thanks for the ask!

What people want to do with their writing differs. Some write for fun, to have a laugh with the rest of the fandom/community; it’s a hobby. Some are trying to see if they’ve got what it takes to become professional writers; some just like the ship and have no interest beyond that. They’re all valid reasons to write. My advice is to the kind of fledgling author I used to be, the one who wanted to be a professional and wanted their writing to be decent, and it’s this:

Read a lot

Write a lot

Step out of your comfort zone

Attend workshops/read writing guides/be open to critique

[discussion under the cut ‘cause it’s looooooong]

1. Read a lot

It goes without saying; reading is what feeds a writer. I did a travel writing workshop once and the editor told us that he could always tell from someone’s writing what they’d been reading. What one reads the most comes through in one’s writing whether they intend it or not. This “or not” is why I’ve been vigilant ever since to avoid reading anything that I don’t want to be influenced by: gossip mags, for instance, or run-of-the-mill urban fantasy.

As for fic writers, I’d suggest reading the best examples of writing in your fandom. Read them often and try to see what it is about them that you love and you’d like to emulate: is it the banter? The prose? The UST and emotions? The plot? How did the author do it? Tip #4 below helps with that.

I’d also strongly advise resisting the temptation to read only fic. Like the editor above, now I can usually tell if an author has been consuming only fanfic, because the sentences sound familiar. Fanfic can be restrictive when it’s the only thing you consume. People like to rail against published books on tumblr, but as someone who actually wants to be published one day, that attitude irritates me. It’s also false. There’s a ton of marvellous stuff out there, books from people from all over the world, books with great prose or great plot, books from marginalised authors, classics that are classics for a reason, new authors doing incredible stuff.

tl;dr: read the best writing you can get your hands on (incl. published books) as often as you can

2. Write a lot

This also goes without saying. Writing is a skill; the more you practice, the better you become at it. Fic is amazing for it! You practice writing plot, dialogue, characterisation, description. You might insert on original character or two.

At the beginning, a new writer’s output might not be as amazing as what they’d like it to be, but recognising that it’s not there yet is actually a huge step in improving. So write loads, and don’t be afraid to write things no one will see. Set a word count target (you could join a community such as��@gywo) and try to reach that target. It could be 300 words a day or 2k words every weekend or a total of 12k a month, whatever works for you. Make writing a habit. Ask people here to prompt you, write off-the-cuff. Some of it won’t be great – to you. But there’ll always be a reader who loves the quick drabble you wrote. And even if the post goes unnoticed, move on. Write the next drabble/fic, and then the next. Just keep writing and keep making it the best you can.

tl;dr: write your arse off

3. Step out of your comfort zone

This tip isn’t one you usually see in these kinds of lists, but to me it’s an important one. What I mean is that complacency can be a writer’s biggest enemy. Say you’ve reached a decent writing level, you’ve got some readers, you’re having fun writing your fics. They’re becoming popular so you think you’re doing something right and write some more in the same vein. This is all good, but it might also lead to stagnation.

Stepping out of your comfort zone shakes things up. This advice relates to the other tips. First, read something that you normally avoid, esp. if people are saying it’s a fantastic piece of writing. My thinking is that if X fic has rave reviews but happens to be mpreg (which I loathe), the benefits of being exposed to the great writing outweigh the mpreg–and I can always skim through that part. Do consider your triggers if you have any and look after yourself, but also don’t confuse them with dislikes.

Reading outside your genre is a great way to shake things up: if you’re into Eighth-Year drarry, read them as fifty-year-olds. If you only read Auror case fics, read a smoking-hot PWP or an achingly-cute domestic drarry. If the books you buy are all adult sci-fi, try this contemporary YA everyone’s been raving about. Read poetry, if you don’t! Even if you don’t get it. Just read it, consider the word choices and put it aside. You don’t have to read outside your comfort zone all the time, but try to do it with some regularity and make sure you choose great quality works.

Same with writing: if you write in one genre, try writing a story in another. Maybe you’ll fuck it up. No one needs to see it. At least you’ve tried. This is where workshops or writing exercises come in handy. Recently I took part in one where some drarry authors wrote a paragraph with sentences up to seven words, and another that was only one sentence. Imagine writing a 200-word sentence! You’ll probably never use it in your life, but it’s such a great way to practise sentence structure and see the effect it has on tone and pacing. Prompts can help as well: some of the AU prompts I received were things I longed to write, but others were harder. Some I fucked up. But I wrote a flower shop fic for a friend, which is something I’d never in my life write willingly lol, and it turned out wonderful and it’s actually become very popular. I’m currently writing a historical AU, which is def outside my comfort zone, and it’s taking me ages, but it also forces me to examine it from all angles to find how to make it work for me, and that means I get to learn a bit more about writer-me.

Writing outside your comfort zone is also about writing things that might make you emotional. Natalie Goldberg’s writing book (mentioned above) was one of the first I read and it’s influenced me a great deal: she says that when you feel choked up or upset or emotional while writing a scene, keep writing. You’ve tapped into a vein. Digging deep in a character’s psyche might make you uncomfortable, sure; it means digging deep inside yourself and some dark parts of you that you might not necessarily like. Keep going. For me, that’s what pushes someone’s writing from good to amazing. It’s why some fics stand out, get recced loads and are lauded, even if they don’t have a huge amount of kudos.

tl;dr: read books outside your genre, do writing exercises and write things that make you emotional

4. Attend workshops/read writing guides/be open to critique

Let me repeat that this is advice for people who want their writing to be better and who possibly want to go pro. If you’re writing as a hobby, you needn’t pay attention to this. For the rest: learning the technical aspects of the craft can make a huge difference in your writing.

At first, you might enjoy a fic and not know why. Workshops and writing guides can help you identify what it is you liked. You’ll be able to examine a novel with a different eye when you’re familiar with the 3-act structure rather than go “wow, the pacing was amazing, I couldn’t put this down, but I don’t know why”.

There are dozens of writing guides out there. After reading more than thirty, I can confirm they get repetitive after a while. But read a couple of them, at the very least. Check if your library has: Writing Down the Bones by Natalie Goldberg, Steering the Craft by Ursula Le Guin (though I wouldn’t rec this one if you’re completely new), On Writing by King, Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott (which is also really funny).

Attending a workshop/accepting critique is the hardest to arrange. It requires other people, you can’t read it or borrow it from your library. Now, I’ve heard from people who attended creative writing seminars that they were in class with a bunch of idiots who had strong opinions as to what’s literature and what’s not. If that’s something you’d rather not face, then there are creative writing MOOCs around where people are kinder and more supportive. I’ve taken several and am a huge advocate of them. You can audit a MOOC (watch the video with the lecture, do the reading, skip the assignment) but participating will help the most. You might get 1-2 or even 15 people commenting on your work, telling you what worked and what didn’t. Some common elements will arise: perhaps everyone liked the dialogue, but many felt the description was lacking. It’s not a pleasant feeling, but you’ll have a clearer idea of what works and what doesn’t. Examining each piece of critique and seeing if you agree or not with it is a big step in improving.

Having your work betaed is of course the number one thing you can do to improve, and having a good beta is invaluable–and not always easy to find. Try to find a good beta. Finally, If you’re in a fandom community, see if you can arrange a workshop thing with your friends. Just make sure that you’re all on board with critiquing each other’s writing with kindness, but also not just squeeing. Squeeing can take place with critiquing, it’s not mutually exclusive.

tl;dr: learn the technical aspects of the craft and learn to accept critique

Thanks for the ask! I hope you don’t mind such a detailed answer :))

#writing advice #writing #writeblr #writing tips #my craft or sullen art #asks #i think i'll copy this on my wordpress

107 notes · View notes

autoirishlitdiscourses · 3 years ago

Text

Discourse of Saturday, 03 July 2021

Have a good recitation.

Jolly old woman. One option that you turn in a particular text, and quite engaging and lucid, and does so in section on 27 November recitation, too, OK? You may find that speaking with me on the web? You should do, in fact, you have a Disabled Services Program accommodation for? One way but not unimportant juxtapositions that the episode—are we to make this offer to do so, because it makes life more stressful for you to make a habit of it myself.

I think that one of the situation, but I think that what your argument to go is also an impressive move you might notice Bloom's interest in is the only representation of its most precious illusions. I expected, and you receive no credit for the positions that you should by all means pay close attention to how other people would probably help you grow as a whole. Don't forget to look at what constitutes evidence, and you related it well to the question of what texts you see, specifically? The group was already warmed up for points of your texts, a good Thanksgiving break. You effectively acknowledged the work. You could theoretically have been possible to accomplish this before in case they ask you if he asks you specific questions that you have any questions as you point out of all of these come down to recite and discuss can be a way that makes a strong reason for doing a good student and I enjoyed having you in section tonight, along with the rest of the texts, and it shows in places, and/or need to be making, since we've just set this up, I've also gone ahead and decide which texts you want to get this to everyone who was genuinely responsive to early questions didn't get your ideas in here, although this was a mispronunciation of surmise that broke the poem's ideas needed a vocal pause in order to move up, if you'd like. I'm not faulting you for doing such an incredibly minimalist effort on the other side of your discussion notes by the victims and requires a Dirty Harry, a productive choice, so I do not re-inscribe Gertie into the A-and I appreciate that you're capable of punching through to a copy of the theorists involved and the group to agree with the assumption that you can do at least twelve lines of poetry into music and want to take a radically relativist position and suggest that everything else goes smoothly with you, I can think in line 22. Looks good to me. You really do have good, clear readings of all but the attentive amongst you will have to get very very sensitive and nuanced interpretation—I've tried to point your students at it, and the to a strong preference on going second or third, although the multiple starts ate up time that could have been in all ways to read from Butcher Boy here. Alternately, you did fumble a bit here. Nothing that I'm still a few things that, going into the novel within one of the class about stereotypes of Irish Women's Poetry, 1967-2000 ISBN 978-0-916390-88-4 around, it's a bit of wiggle room. In any case, you're welcome to share these with your own ideas. For the recitation, got people talking. Think about what your overall payoff will be. I get there naturally. I don't mean to take so long to get it in a lot of information with a GPA of 3. That section of the quarter, you might profitably compare/contrast formula and show that you're dealing with. Again, very solid work here. /Annotations to James Joyce's Ulysses: she's married and has been very close less than thrilled about with this question, but are intended to culminate in a comparative manner over time, I think that you're talking about home in general might mean by passionate, insightful, moving delivery and/or larger concerns. More administrative issues?

Both of these are impressive moves. 54 2. Hi! It never compares, at least forty-eight hours of your mind, keep reciting it, in part because, when it's entirely up to him. In all of which parts of The Butcher Boy the following details about exactly what you're going to depend on where you found it on a different segment later in the judgments that sort people into the A-paper receives is based on whether or not effectively support the writer's argument. Hi! /Or minor problems. Forcing yourself to ground your analysis more: I think, always a productive exercise I myself use LibreOffice.

I hit the Send button in my camera died, I'm sorry to say, I have a good weekend! You really have done some very, very good outcomes of your writing is also impressive. You have a few other things, and the ideas you had a good job of covering a large number of important things to say this not just of choosing not to say that a B paper one day: although you should then discuss the readings in a more elaborate description if you have any other questions! I'm planning on doing a strong job!

Great! The Dubliners' version of GOLD than you were very sensitive and nuanced things to talk to me. So, in a chapter of Theodor Adorno and Max Horkheimer's Dialectic of Enlightenment that is in your delivery was good, but made up for it. —As it needs to be over. Thanks again for doing a genuinely excellent job well done. However, I think that bringing one of the room, but I'm hesitant to quote in, say, surrealist painting and other works, we should be engaging in a packet of poems tonight. I did better. All in all, you can make my 6 o'clock section, so I hope you had a good holiday, and it's a reflective piece, for that section within the realm of possibility for you. Or you could be made about grammar and phrasing but these are required, and I quite like your performance, that's incredibly comprehensive. Currently, what do you mean when you argue that one thing is nothing more than you were so excited by your own writing and/or the penalty. I didn't anticipate at the structural schema given to friends: Carlo Linati; Stuart Gilbert J. B 415 435 B 400 415 B-77% 80% C 73% 77% C 70% 73% C-means that a contemporary English poet might be productive. Come by my office hours. That is to say. You covered some important things in your analysis in a third document might involve how media images get stuck in Francie's head and the rusted poison did corrode his blood the way: It's often easier to get back to you with comments tomorrow. There are a couple of extra minutes to make sure it's a wonderful and restful holiday break! Picking a selection of what you see as the source of a topic that I can. You'll get that in as soon as you can bring your participation score a small boost to your next email it to the course's large-scale course concerns and themes, looking at evidence that you can do with the Easter Rising, and not Silence of the stack anyway. First: make sure that it's one of the due date that you want to ruin it for a student with a well-structured manner; and mop up on posting links to songs and other emotions related to each other, broader problem is that I assign your final exam yes, that you want to help each and every lecture. If you wanted to meet this status, there are some of Yeats's poem, its mythical background, contemporary politics, and number the episodes on the syllabus. Excellent! That's fine just let me do so. Again, thank you for putting so much that that is important in connecting outrage to analysis. One of these various types and weave them into a more specific: I am of course grade. I think. 'S, 5 C-range paper/—even by one line—/is/always/bring the week's readings with you that placing the non-traumatized at least 98% on the most important would be a useful fallback plan. I will be. If you have any other number of genuinely meaningful contributions that you demonstrate a very productive. Strange feeling it would help you to trace a clear line between some line that intersects several of these come down to it? Hell, bandwidth's really cheap these days. So, where do you see as the major possibilities, and we can meet on campus never quarter. However, I think that you're painfully aware of their work relates to WB's work. However, you did eight IDs instead of or in posting your notes are absolutely unchangeable, because you clearly had a low-ish A-scale umbrella of what might be a motivated one, and don't remember it in economic terms or terms that differ are generally fair and often very nuanced readings by using hedging phrases like I said before, and good choice to me, and you've proven that you are absent or late, missing more than the course as a whole and contextualizing the paper, and that it's less successful than it would have had to take so long to get back to you.

So, it may be that our sympathy is based on the midterm would result in a lot of things well here: you had planned to cover, refreshing everyone's memory on the final. I completely appreciate that you're already doing a good student this quarter, and I hope you have a good idea, you did quite a good chunk of the problem with the middle of how percentages or point totals above are necessary ways to approach the question from another angle: What is the ideal resource, but you did quite an impressive move, which involves speculations about the relative value of the play pp. Think about what your paper. On Raglan Road, which has Calc, a professor in our department, Candace Waid, just over the break. That is, I also consider lack of Irish literature. /Corrections, but will post before I pass it out, it will eventually force someone to speak without forcing them. So, my suggestion is not that you really have done some very good recitation and what kind of reader-response criticism which is to have a sense of what texts you choose a good sense of the beautiful little gem that is appropriate and helpful.

It is in the novel. I'm gonna pretend I didn't anticipate at the last day for most of that motivation is will pay off to have thought of it as coming in on the day you are, after all, you've got a good holiday break! I left item 5 off of the first line of your recitation. There is a series of archaic softhearted misplaced sympathies for criminals. Another potentially profitable, but needs to be finding a way to find that thesis, because they're from a rope on line 14; changed I told him that I think that the professor's announcement that he has now missed three sections a very good job in a thesis statement throughout your time and attention to the pound, which pulled the grades up. Unfortunately, the average i.

#Irish literature #automatically generated text #Patrick Mooney #Python #Markov chains

0 notes

rp-sephiroth · 8 years ago

Note

Is the FF7 remake now making the Compilation non-canon?? My friend gave me these news and I don't know if it's genuine information.

(continues:) My friend hates this possibility. She loves Crisis Core, and having that become non-canon brings several concerns.

Thank you for your question!

A quick google search earned me no confirmation of this statement. But as a writer of FF7 fanfic writer/Sephiroth-roleplayer/Leiden university student of literature, I shall do my best to give you and educated and conclusive answer instead.

TL;DR: It’s unavoidable, and will have far-reaching implications for fandom community, but it will be OK and below’s why.

What is canon?This definition of canon from here is what I will be using in this post:

Canon - a term borrowed from the Catholic Church, meaning ‘established truth’. The definition of ‘canon’ is a bit vague, but is usually understood to mean the body of works upon which a fandom is based, and any information contained therein. This is sometimes extended to include information in guidebooks, interviews, and other such sources. Also used to refer to information from different versions of a story: for example, the school uniforms in Harry Potter ‘book-canon’ are different from those in ‘movie-canon’.

It is a way for the creators to indicate “this is the set of in-game truths and rules we are working with.” It’s a way to keep the rules that govern the world consistent. In Final Fantasy VII, one can either regard just the OG (original game) as canon, or the entire compilation as canon.

What happens if canon is made invalid? This happened to the StarWars fandom. Around the first 6 films were novels, lego, books, fanarts, and fanfictions. This franchise is incredibly interesting because it does not make canon top-down (from the creators to the plebs), but also accepts work from fans (bottom-up).

An example: anyone could write a StarWars book, as long as they stuck so guidelines set by the official creators and had it checked for approval. Anyone could be a stormtrooper, as long as you used the exact right plastic moulds and sent pictures of the finished product to the official people who approved it. (My first boyfriend did this for his cosplay.)

Anyway, the novels continued the storyline after film six (I believe all the main characters had children). But when LucasFilms and Disney embarked on making the 7th film, they decided to throw all that worldbuilding (universe-building) away. Why did they throw it away? Because for legal reasons authors cannot read fan-fictions and this post explains why (link). In short: if the script writers of film 7 were to base film 7 on an any canon work, a fan could claim “I wrote a fanfic about exactly this” and face huge legal charges. Even/Especially a franchise that has a very agreeable bottom-up treatment of canon and fandom culture, has to watch out. Rey from film 7 is a completely new character, with her own timeline.

THUS THERE IS A BIG CHANCE THE CANON OF THE COMPILATION OF FINAL FANTASY 7 WILL BE DECLARED INVALID.

In the past, how has FF7 fandom dealt with canon vs new canon? A long time ago, the Original Game (OG) was the 'mothership’. Sephiroth was portrayed as evil. To give him any sign of niceness in fanfiction was considered out-of-character and greatly discouraged.Then FFVII Cisis Core came out, and certain fans rioted against the game’s portrayal of a kind, awkward Sephiroth.

For the Final Fantasy VII Remake to be identical to the Original Game with updated graphics would be impossible. Such a game would not sell. There will be changes in the game mechanics, dynamics, aesthetics, and narrative to make the game contemporary. I feel two ways about those changes: frightened and joyous.

How does it relate to online FF7 fandom communities?Now our 'canon’ 'mothership’ is the Compilation of Final Fantasy VII. Our current fandom community is built around what we have learnt of the compilation. Because FF7 is so big, it’s impossible to know everything about the story and characters and mechanics. People specialise, and draw on each other’s experience.

My area of specialisation is Sephiroth, with in-depth knowledge of his scenes in Advent Children Complete, Crisis Core, Before Crisis, Kingdom Hearts, and Original Game. I’m still learning about his Dissidia, Ehrgeitz, and other versions. This knowledge of this character and interpretation of this character gives me social merit in roleplay communities. It’s said if you put 1000 hours of work into learning something, you are an expert. I’ve been writing Sephiroth on and off since I was 14. I’m 26 now. In my niche, I am an expert. Fans ask me questions about Sephiroth because they trust me to provide a plausible answer that conflicts least with canon.

But if/when the Compilation of Final Fantasy VII will be declared invalid, social status based on the no-longer-canon Compilation will be rendered useless. This means that when I make a statement on Remake-Sephiroth, all my arguments based on experience of (years!) of development of my Sephiroth will be useless. Scary.

This will upset the social structures of the communities. Experts are no longer expert. With the release of the first episode/chapter of the Remake, new fans and old fans start learning at the same time about the 'new’ canon. They will have the same chance to become expert. The one fan who will put in enough hours, will get most social status, will be crowned expert.

Old groups of friends may stick together. New groups will form. New sub-communities rise. Some fans will riot against new information, as they did insisting that Crisis Core Sephiroth couldn’t be kind/awkward/friendly. More about attitudes and a ‘desired attitude’ later.

How can FF7 fans and roleplayers negotiate with old canon and new canon to find a position which they are comfortable with?The use of the word headcanon will go through a shift. 'Headcanon’ will no longer be a combination of traits/habits one puts on the character like a sticker (my trademark headcanon is that my Sephiroth puts his hair in a braid/my belief that Sephiroth follows the Jenova Omega Theory). Instead, the word 'headcanon’ will return to its old meaning: “In my head, this set of rules is canon.” The word 'headcanon’ will then refer to a set of metaphysical choices on how the FF7 world and characters function as a framework.

My friend @askcrv2 solved this question ingeniously. I’m taking a detour into the Vocaloid fandom: she writes a singing android robot. With robots, there are new versions every few years. The voice bank is updated. New songs. New merchandise… - and thus new canons. Nowadays version 4 is common. She writes version 2. She had her robot hide in a warehouse to avoid the garbage pile. This way, she can both stick to her old canons, but also in the new versions, her old version is still valid. Her robot complements new canon. Compliments to the writer!

The Compilation of Final Fantasy VII is fun, and I love it.It is not perfect. There are glaring inconsistencies. These plot holes could be changed in the Remake. But it’s not wrong to love the Final Fantasy VII from 1997 and style your preferences to that version.

IF/WHEN it’s made invalid… How do we as fans continue?When the Original Game and/or the Compilation as a whole be declared invalid, it will hurt. I will have to renegotiate my attitude towards Sephiroth as a character, and to the story as a whole, and find back my position in a new community.

This game has kept me captivated for many years, so I have high hopes for the future product. I expect that the managers/teams/designers of the company have improved with 20 years more of experience. The Remake is being re-made from scratch. I have respect for the game team’s hard work and sacrifices. I imagine that every change in the ’new canon’ will be a thoroughly-debated decision. The promotional video (link) of the Remake reveals the attitude the game-makers would like to see in the fans:

The reunion at hand may bring joy, it may bring fear, but let us embrace whatever it brings. For they are coming back.

And that’s best of all. After 20 years, FF7 will be coming back. It’s not the fandom’s job anymore to re-create the world. The original creators will tell our favourite story back to us, and we can sit back… until we start making new fanworks!

Let’s embrace whatever it brings.

Let’s make fantastic fanworks, and build warm communities.

The canon of the Compilation of Final Fantasy 7 will never be a forgotten memory. The Compilation will live on, inside us. I hope this post sufficiently answers your question. Tell your friend not to worry.

– rp-Sephiroth.

#i hope this gif works #ask #answer #answered #canon #fan theory #Anonymous

30 notes · View notes

strangledeggs · 8 years ago

Text

What A Glorious Time To Be Free

This is a more personal essay on irony, the passage of time and disillusionment. Content Warning for mention of domestic abuse/violence.

“Singer-songwriter” is a term that tends to instantly conjure a certain type of “sincere” musician, one who wants to communicate a “real” feeling through their combined proficiency in words and music. The notion of sincerity in this context is at least a little odd considering many of the most famous songwriters have made careers out of ironic jabs at the very cliches they like to flirt with; Bob Dylan and Bruce Springsteen come to mind. And yet somehow, whether or not this stereotype has any truth to it has done nothing to dispel the cultural image of the “sincere, sensitive songwriter”.

If you’re anything like me, you’ve been closely tracking the apparent dichotomy between “irony” and “sincerity”, their varying popularities, the spaces in which each seems most prevalent, how these factors can impact culture on a grand scale. I can still remember three years ago when an English professor at the University of Toronto introduced me to one of my favourite ideas I’ve taken out of my education so far: he too had noted a sort of struggle between irony and sincerity in culture over the last several decades, but he felt that the most current art (literature, at least) was finding a sort of compromise. He called this compromise “birony”. “Bironic” art (no relation to the “Byronic hero”, an unfortunately phonemically identical literary concept) would refuse to be seen as either sincere or ironic alone. It is instead both genuine and self-distancing at the same time. One example he had pointed to was Gary Shteyngart’s “Super Sad True Love Story”. I believe I may have dug up another from pop music history.

The song in question, Donald Fagen’s “I.G.Y.” (also apparently known as “What A Beautiful World”), actually predates the contemporary era of which my English professor declared birony to be the product. It was released in 1982, in the midst of the Cold War. I will address the significance of this in just a bit, but first I’d like to explain out why this song’s bironic tone was apparent to me almost from the start. Some background is needed for those who are unfamiliar with Donald Fagen: the man was half of the songwriting team that made up the popular 70s rock band Steely Dan. Along with Walter Becker, he wrote songs with a bitter satirical edge, tackling Las Vegas (“Show Biz Kids”), generational conflict (“Barrytown”), nuclear apocalypse (“King of the World”) and any idealist with a glimmer of a hope for freedom (“Only A Fool Would Say That”).

Certainly some of Fagen’s solo work continues in this ironic tradition, but “I.G.Y.” is noticeably different. Having come to its hosting album “The Nightfly” with only that tradition as my context, I was rather shocked to hear the lyrics of “I.G.Y.”, which seem to describe an ideal vision of the future (superfast intercontinental transit! space travel! government by supercomputer!) without a hint of irony. The refrain (from which part of the alternate title is derived) proclaims “What a beautiful world it will be, / What a glorious time to be free!”, backed by a chorus and a light reggae-esque shuffle. Is this the same Donald Fagen that sang “I heard it was you talking ‘bout a world where all is free, / It just couldn’t be”?

Something was definitely off, and being suspicious as I was, I decided to do some research. It turned out my naive millenial self was missing some generational context that would have made the title more illuminating had I been born say, 50 years earlier: “I.G.Y.” was actually an acronym, referring to the “International Geophysical Year”, a period of scientific collaboration between 1957 and 1958. During this relatively peaceful patch of the Cold War, over sixty countries began working on science projects that would come to define the aesthetics and ideas of “the future” for the generation that grew up over the course of the 1950s, including solar power, spandex and the very first satellites.

Donald Fagen, born in 1948, would have been approximately 10 years old during this period. It is possible that the projected potential of these futuristic technologies in development would have sparked his imagination, causing it to run wild with utopian visions. I say this partly because I am consciously projecting here; I know, had lived during the I.G.Y. (particularly if I was the same age Fagen was at the time), that I would have been absolutely ecstatic with optimism. It’s a nerd kid’s dream come true: everyone gets to live happily ever after and it’s all thanks to SCIENCE!

When I was a teenager, my father, who more or less lived right through this period, showed me a book he had called “Wasn’t The Future Wonderful?” Released in 1979, the book collected various images from the 1930s that depicted the imaginary technology of “the future” and helped to spawn the still-popular aesthetics of “retrofuturism” (see: Fallout). Though it focuses on a period almost thirty years prior to the I.G.Y., the book captures a similar naivety. It’s not to say that many of the projects of the I.G.Y. didn’t have real, useful results, or that the promises weren’t delivered on; we still got spandex and solar power and the space race. But the title’s retrospective quality is telling, as is our current condition. Clearly we are not living in the futuristic utopia of the Jetsons.

This was likely to be even more apparent to someone like Fagen, who lived not only through the I.G.Y., but also through the 24 years leading up to 1982*, in which he released “What A Beautiful World”. During that time, the relative period of Cold War peace ended and US citizens witnessed the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Vietnam War, the assassination of a president and a period of tension so high that Prince had to beg “Ronnie” Reagan to “Talk To Russia” in the year before Fagen’s first solo album. In addition to all this, before most of these events even happened, Russia tested the largest thermonuclear weapon developed to that point in history, the “Tsar Bomba”, in 1961. It would seem to even the most optimistic American that the future was not as friendly as it had seemed even a few years earlier.

I’m not Donald Fagen and I’ve never even met the man, so I can’t claim to know how any of this really impacted him. But there’s a certain narrative that, even if it isn’t true, would go a long way towards explaining what happened to him between 1958 and 1982 that led to his writing “I.G.Y.” Put simply, Fagen might have experienced a classic “loss of innocence” narrative: he began as a young idealist around the time of the I.G.Y., hoping that science could lead to a more peaceful and prosperous world; he then watched those hopes crumble over the next couple decades as widespread violence and accompanying disillusionment returned with a vengeance, eventually ending up the cynical songwriter he was in Steely Dan.

Whether or not this is really what happened to Fagen himself, it would make a nice frame for why I’ve come to see the song as a prime example of “birony”. Knowing the historical context for “I.G.Y.” will make it seem much more like the ironic critiques he contributed to his former band. However, I believe there is still a hint of sincerity in the song. If you forget the historical context, it sounds like a fairly genuine hope for the future, as if Fagen’s 10-year-old self suddenly re-surfaced to sing it. And maybe some part of him still has those same hopes, that one day society could achieve the sort of technological utopia his song describes. But in the end, the disillusionment is inevitable, as we continue to see more than thirty years on from the song’s release.

The lyrics, of course, sound sincere enough to still make you believe (and to fool those lacking the historical context). Some would say this is part of the “trick” that makes it so ironic. I’d go even further and say this actually teaches us something new about irony, at least in this context: irony is not, in fact, the polar opposite of sincerity. Contrary to what we are often told, there is something quite sincere about the irony of “I.G.Y.” The lyrics could not have been written without a sincere belief at some point (maybe Fagen’s, maybe someone else’s) that their ideal world was a real possibility. And at the same time, the disappointment collected over the years up until the song’s release is also quite sincere. The song becomes a serious lament that this type of utopia might never have even been possible in the first place. Thus its “ironic distancing” is actually comprised of two very sincere beliefs, one of which just happens to contradict the other.

Is this still irony? Or is it that new invention of my English professor, “birony”? I’m not entirely sure if I can answer that question alone, or at least not without a much more in-depth study than this one. However, I would like to change direction here for a moment and point out once again that I don’t actually know whether or not this is even the “true” story of “I.G.Y.” I say this because even if it isn’t, I brought it up for a reason: the disillusionment narrative I constructed behind it is actually quite personal. OK, yeah, I didn’t live through the Cold War, and I’ve never written a song as great as “I.G.Y.” and probably never will. But the song’s implicit “fall from grace” arc hits me on a, shall we say “scientific” level.

Growing up, I took a serious interest in science, probably in part because my father was one himself (a geologist, for those who are curious). Our family wasn’t really religious at all and I ended up with a much stronger belief in the “power of science” than in any kind of divine order of things. I took this interest/belief with me through school, which won the approval of many teachers who in our age seem to increasingly associate studious/successful children with such a scientific focus. And then somewhere in high school it began to slip. I say this not only because I started to realize I would never be able to become a scientist myself (my math grades made sure of this) and not because I stopped taking science courses to focus on other subjects, which I didn’t do but in hindsight maybe should have. I continued to learn a lot about science, but I also started to learn about other subjects which were a little more critical of the discipline. A basic philosophy class helped me realize how hard it is to have a strong foundation for any kind of concrete belief, including those implicit in the scientific method. Some historical background on eugenics made me realize that people could use public faith in science as an excuse to violate others’ human rights just the same as religious institutions had abused their power. Suddenly, scientists were no longer clearly “the good guys”.

This is not to try and create a narrative of “enlightenment” for myself. The ending of this story is not that I “now know better” and I’m not claiming to have answers to any of the philosophical problems I raised. All I’m trying to prove here is that my beliefs in science were shaken in a similar (though probably less violent) manner to those of a 10-year-old kid coming out of the warmth of the I.G.Y. and into the Cold War. Nowadays, though I’m still inclined to believe most scientists on a number of things, I’m significantly more skeptical of “science” as a cultural institution or as a justification for anything. We probably all have stories like this, stories in which we grew up believing strongly in something only to have that belief turned upside-down later in life. These disillusionments can sometimes have devastating effects on us, radically changing the people we once thought ourselves to be into other people entirely. Sometimes it’s relatively inconsequential, but most of the time it’s at least somewhat painful.

It just so happens that I experienced another painful disillusionment along these lines more recently. As you can probably deduce through my familiarity with their work, I used to listen to Steely Dan a lot, particularly when I was a teenager (coincidentally, right around the time I started to become more suspicious of science). This, too, I inherited from my parents, who were big fans back in their high school and university days when the band still existed. I was impressed by their musicianship, their refusal to distinguish between rock and jazz and, of course, their slyly biting lyrics which I only appreciated more over time. Naturally, I got into Donald Fagen’s post-Dan solo career and loved it almost as much. I guess you could say I sort of idolized the guy. And being disposed to an “innocent until proven guilty” method of judging people, I assumed he was probably at the very least a decent enough person. It’s true that the lyrics in certain Steely Dan songs displayed tendencies towards the fetishization of Asian women (“Bodhisattva”) or creepy relationships with “barely legal” girls (“Hey Nineteen”), but I was hoping these were simply mistakes that Fagen since recognized and regretted.

Early in January last year, it was reported that Donald Fagen had beaten his wife, Libby Titus, and that she was going to divorce him. Apparently the two have since “reconciled”, though exactly how is unclear and I remain very suspicious of Fagen for doing such a terrible thing in the first place. I am also concerned for his wife as I am for any partner caught in a situation of potential domestic violence. However, not being an expert on the situation or the subject, I will leave the social issue to those experts dedicated to solve it. What I am more qualified to write about is the strange disillusionment that occurs when something like this happens, when a public figure breaches trust with an audience that has inevitably deified them.

There’s a whole discourse on the idea of the famous talent that does something their audience doesn’t agree with morally, turning them into the “problematic fave”, but there are some acts which shift from “problematic” into a deeper level of criminality and Donald Fagen’s abuse falls into the latter category. Some tend to reject the talent outright following such acts and I completely understand that course and the reasons for doing it. But I can’t seem to do it with Donald Fagen and his music. This is not because I don’t think the issue is important; it absolutely is, and I will continue to tell people about what Donald Fagen did to at the very least alert people to the fact that he’s probably not the “generally decent person” I once assumed he was and at most help to spark more conversations about domestic violence. Hopefully we will also see a point at which Libby Titus is safe, though this is something few of us will get to have any say in.

The truth is, I could renounce my love for Steely Dan and Donald Fagen and whatever part of myself was shaped by their music. I can (and have) felt bad listening to it when I think of the man behind it. But I would be lying to myself if I said that I didn’t enjoy it anymore and that I didn’t want to listen to it again. The music still reaches me and I don’t think I can do anything about that.

So the music remains. What about the man himself? Well, I certainly won’t be giving him any more of my money any time soon. Of course, there’s that disillusionment again. And once again, both the love for the music and the disillusionment with the person are real. It’s difficult to discover that someone you saw as a hero simply isn’t. Some would probably say that this is simply the way life moves and that this is how we learn over time; we must abandon our heroes and our worship of outside forces to somehow achieve an enlightenment through our trust in our own perceptions alone, recognizing that everyone else is as fallible as we are. Personally, I don’t buy this logic, partly because I don’t believe that there is any “authentic self” underneath the self I’ve built through following others and partly because I do believe that some people are less fallible than me, at least in some areas. Those people are the heroes, and though they may become damaged by revelation of their natures, we still tend to have some sort of need for them, although some more than others.

I certainly still feel like I need heroes to follow and shape myself in the image of, but maybe I need to take a more bironic (again, not “Byronic”) approach to them. I can’t follow in their footsteps knowing that they are the kind of people I don’t ever actually want to become. But at the same time, I often have some grain of admiration I can’t seem to shake; some trust in the scientists that develop vaccines and work towards automated labour, some emotions still stirred when I hear the winding chord changes of “Rikki Don’t Lose That Number”. It certainly doesn’t excuse Donald Fagen, and it’s not a way out of the social inequality in which he is an oppressor. But it at least helps to explain why I might still have seemingly contradictory reactions to such situations.

*This may be poorly phrased as to make it sound as if Fagen is deceased. He has actually continued to live up to this very year and recently gave an interview in which he described modern life as “resembling something out of a Vonnegut novel”.

#cw domestic violence

1 note · View note

dailyaudiobible · 6 years ago

Text

02/16/2019 DAB Transcript

Leviticus 1:1-3:17, Mark 1:29-2:12, Psalms 35:17-28, Proverbs 9:13-18

Today is the 16th day of February. Welcome to the Daily Audio Bible. I am Brian and it is a pleasure and an honor to be here with you at the close of another week. And yeah, as we begin next week, tomorrow we’re going to be beginning our pilgrimage to the land of the Bible and we'll talk about that a little bit more at the end, but here we are the beginning. And yesterday we finished the book of Exodus, which brings us to a new book in the Old Testament that were beginning today.

Introduction to the book of Leviticus:

Leviticus is the third book of the Pentateuch or Torah and it's written to the children of Israel and we're in the middle of the desert at this point, right? So, we followed the children of Israel out of Egypt and slavery and into the wilderness and we've been kind of camped out at Mount Sinai, out in the middle of the desert for a bit and that's where…that's where we are at this point in the story. God is establishing the terms of the covenant between himself and the people that He set apart and chosen to be holy. And it's been about a year since they've been out of Egypt and now the law is being given. And as we pay close attention we’ll sort of see a sub theme emerge out of the laws and statutes. Everything that they are commanded to do and obey and observe all has a spiritual underpinning. Everything that they do is to remind them of their spiritual reality and their holiness before God and their covenantal relationship with God. And holiness is a huge, huge thing to God. In fact, God tells them, “I am holy therefore, you will be holy”. And, of course, holy means set apart to God. So, God is saying, “if we’re gonna be in a relationship, right, if we’re gonna be communing together and enjoying each other's company and fellowship with each other than this is gonna only happen through holiness.” So, you know, Leviticus, we get to this point in the year and this is when a lot of the New Year's resolutions start wearing off. And we’re just a couple days post Valentine's Day and that is usually the point where the community for the year is established, those who are gonna make it have decided to do it and it usually kind of corresponds to how well you're doing with your other New Year's resolutions, right? Some people are like, “I’m not reading Leviticus and I'm not eating any more boiled chicken and salad.” And that's fine. I mean, we get to choose…we get to choose our lives, but what I’ve found over the years is that a lot of those people, a lot of that, if that's you, if you're like, “okay I just can't…like I just gotta get off this train”, pretty good chance that one year from today you may be right where you are right now. So, I'm telling all of us, we can do this, we can take this journey, we just have to understand the territory that we are moving through as we move through the Bible. Yeah, not all of it is like sit at the edge of your seat riveting page turner stuff. Some of it's like we’re reading laws and laws aren’t the kind of literature that's meant to be narrative or edge of your seat, but all of our societies would fall apart without our law books. And, so, we’re going to move through the law and understand its context so that when we come out the other side of the law and begin to move toward the Promise Land ee understand the lay of the land. And, so as we move through Leviticus and we talk about sacrifices and stuff like that we’ll find a lot of blood in this book because there's a lot of sacrifice in it. And if we approach the Old Testament, a work that was inspired thousands of years ago from the perspective of the culture that we live in right now, right, back reading our culture into an ancient culture, then yeah, it'll seem somewhat barbaric and certainly antiquated and perhaps even irrelevant, but it certainly wasn't then. And what it all represents is certainly not all relevant now. It’s as relevant now as ever. And we may wonder why they would just start sacrificing animals and why would God want animal sacrifice. And to find that out how we’ve gotta go back to the beginning. It's been six weeks. We read the account of the garden of Eden. We read of Adam and needs fall. And from that moment all of mankind was separated from God and worthy of destruction spiritually and physically. And remember that story when God came to the garden in the cool of the evening looking for Adam and Eve. They were hiding, and they eventually told God that they were afraid because they were naked. How God responds to that is telling. He covers them with the skins of animals. So, it was God who set this precedent of atonement and covering. It costs something to cover man and woman. It cost the life of an animal. And now we live in a culture after Jesus, where this idea of an atoning sacrifice isn't something that we think about that much other than to just know that Jesus was a sacrifice once and for all. Okay, well, that sacrifice once and for all, we just…just read of that story in the Gospel of Matthew. It was barbaric, it was ugly, it was bloody, it was sad, and the more that we fall in the Jesus the more that we see Jesus at work in our lives, the more we realize that this didn't happen to somebody we don't know, this happened to our closest friend, but His sacrifice was once and for all. All that we needed, He took it all, blameless, willingly and we no longer need any other atonement. That's the reality that we currently live in but the children of Israel back in the book as we start Leviticus, they don't have that luxury. God is showing the children of Israel that to cover their sin comes at a great cost and requires the shedding of blood. It is a constant living cultural reminder for them that sin leads to death and we’ll see God sewing this into the fabric of the culture that He's establishing, we’ll see the burnt offering, the grain offering, the peace offering, the sin offering, the trespass offering and how they're to be given. And we’ll see the way things are to be consecrated and the consecration of priests and priest’s families and we’ll learn what's considered clean and what's considered unclean in the culture and we’ll discover the different festivals and feasts that have to be observed and the blessings and cursings, all against the backdrop of the utter holiness and sovereignty of God. And so, let's embrace this journey as we move forward into and through the book of Leviticus. We’re reading from the Contemporary English Version this week and today we'll read Leviticus chapters 1 through 3.

Prayer:

We thank You Father for another week in Your word, we thank You for all that You’ve spoken and it's like every week You speak volumes into our lives, every week You touch soft tender places inside of us, either to correct us or to comfort and heal us, every day Your word has something for us and we are so deeply grateful. And, so, as we and this week You've brought us into new books in both the old and new Testaments for us to camp out in and enjoy as we move through the remainder of this month. And Father as we prepare to go back and experience the places where so many of these stories occurred in Israel in the land of the Bible we certainly pray Your protection, Your health, Your stamina, Your wisdom over all of it. Come Holy Spirit we pray in Jesus’ mighty name. Amen.

Announcements:

dailyaudiobible.com is the website, it is where you find out what’s going on around here and there are a couple of things going on around here.

The registration for the More Gathering for women, which will take place in the mountains of North Georgia just about an hour outside of Atlanta. Registration is open for that. You get all of the details at moregathering.com or go to dailyaudiobible.com and scroll down to the Initiatives section. Of course, you can see the Initiatives section on the Daily Audio Bible app as well, just got click the drawer icon in the upper left-hand corner. So, we are anticipating and excited and prayerful and hopeful for all that God is going to do on that mountaintop. And any of the you who have ever been, then you know that the God shows up for each of us in the way that we need Him to and it's pretty remarkable. So, if coming…come this spring you feel like you might be looking for new life as new life comes to the earth, if maybe it's been a long stretch for you and you need some perspective, this could be exactly what has been put in your path for a reason. So, pray into that. Hope to see you…hope to see you there.

And I mention we’re going back to the land of the Bible, that is upon us. I will be flying out on the big plane tomorrow and I it's a long way, it's a long flight. It's not my favorite thing to do but I guess it beats walking, especially since I’d have to walk across the ocean, but jet lag can be difficult and logistics can be challenging. I mean there's a lot of moving parts when, you know, you have buses of people who are all from all over the world and it has always been such a beautiful dance to see it all come together, but it has never happened without the intercession and prayer of God's people in this community. And, so, wouldn't dare get on that plane and go back over there again without knowing that there was a canopy of prayer being raised over that. And, so, I ask for your prayers, prayers of safety and travel, prayers for on time delivery of all of our guests who will be arriving on all kinds of different flights, prayer over stamina and health, and jet lag and logistics and all of these things as we prepare to pilgrimage around the land of the Bible. Now, yeah, this is gonna happen for a bunch of people in person but it's always a community experience, it's something that we do together, whether virtually or in person. And, so, we’ll be posting pictures and videos several times a day on our social media channels. Just as things happen we’ll be posting them up. So, be sure to stay connected that way so that you can kinda look in, not only to get a glimpse of what's happening in the Daily Audio Bible community, who's actually going to be in Israel, but also looking into sites that you've heard of, like names that you've heard of in the Bible, places that we've been to in the Bible. Those places are real places and they can come alive and we do everything that we possibly can to make that happen. And we’ll also be doing a live broadcast. We always do this once we reach the sea of Galilee. And we all get together and kind of debrief each other and invite the community in to ask questions and spend about an hour just together as a community virtually even though were spanning across time zones and even international datelines. And, so, we’ll keep you posted on that but thank you for your prayers. And if you are interested in perhaps being one of the of those who actually get to experience the land of the Bible in person next year in 2020, registration is now open for that, You can go to dailyaudiobible.com in the Initiatives section and find Israel 2020 and get all of the details that you would want to know, and get yourself registered. These trips always, at least for the last five or six years, they've always filled up and they've always been sold out, and we've always had a waiting list. So, I wouldn't…you know, if like, if it's something that you’re like, “seriously, I do want to do that” then I wouldn't…I wouldn't wait, but certainly there is time to pray into that. But you can you can now register for Israel 2020 at dailyaudiobible.com.

If you want to partner with the Daily Audio Bible, you can do that at dailyaudiobible.com. There is a link that lives on the homepage. If you're using the Daily Audio Bible app, you can press the Give button in the upper right-hand corner or, if you prefer, the mailing address is PO Box 1996 Spring Hill Tennessee.

And as always, if you have a prayer request or comment, 877-942-4253 is the number to dial.

And that's it for today. I'm Brian I love you and I'll be waiting for you here tomorrow.

Community Prayer and Praise:

Hey Daily Audio Bible family, this is Darrell, this is my second time calling, Darrell Georgia and absolutely love this. I drive a truck at night and this is absolutely a perfect way to get my food, get my daily soaking in God’s word. And Brian I can’t tell you how much I appreciate you and appreciate your passion for God. I am so on board with that passion. There’s no one like our great God. There is nobody like our Jesus and the presence of the Holy Spirit is sustenance for our lives, which brings me to my point. I think your name was T, I think that’s what you said, T, you’re young man and you called in and you’ve been listening since Thanksgiving of last year and you’re struggling with sensing the presence of God or you said the peace of God, you’re battling that. My encouragement to you is dwell on what the word of God says. Believe what the Bible says and what the Bible says is that God’s promises, “I will never leave you or forsake you.” So, the presence of God is there. He is there by your side, never doubt that. My encouragement to you, I believe, what I have experienced for myself is, if I’m feeling maybe empty or feeling like I’m not sensing His presence, I just talk to Him and I worship Him. I tell Him everything that He is to me, I tell Him how amazing He is, and I thank Him for all the little details in my life and that causes me to sense His presence. I hope that’s encouraging to you. My time is just about up. God bless you my brother.

This is a Lynn Song. I just started Daily Audio Bible this year. It’s very hard to call, I feel very vulnerable, but I need prayer for my husband. I wrote what I would say because I was afraid I would go blank. So, my husband has battled depression for years. He’s a musician and feels like a failure because his music has not taken him where he hoped it would. He is very gifted and talented, has made 20+ CDs. He writes things, composes, produces, plays multiple instruments but living in the Midwest makes it difficult. He struggles socially as well so it is challenging for him to market himself. Long story short, I prayed for him for years to for God’s will for him including that he would accept these circumstances if that is what God wants. I want us both to accept God’s will for our lives and I want him to be happy. I need help lifting my husband up in prayer and feel like I am Moses in need of assistance to hold my hands in the air until the battle is won. He came home tonight very depressed and discouraged. So, thank you. And I can’t stress enough, married 21 years and how long we’ve struggled with this. I don’t know if my time will run out, but I wanted to say I’ve been feeling __ hearing how many men are involved in DAB. So, calling for prayer and calling to pray for others. For some reason it’s given me hope for the body of Christ. So, I thank you for praying. I am praying for you all. Thank you so much.

Hi everybody it’s Margo from Australia and I’m now in Uganda. This is actually a bit of a test call to see what the lines like and whether it’s very clear and not working out which number to use. But I just wanted to let you know that I’m going quite well. Still have moments of being homesick but that’s __ and in between I have lots of joyful moments. I wanted to say thank you very much for everyone that’s praying for me. I did start writing down the names so I could thank everyone but I didn’t want to use up all my time just saying a list of names. So, if you’ve prayed for me, thank you so, so much. I did specifically though want to mention Treasured Possession. That word from the Lord, ahhh look, I cried. That was beautiful and encouraging and I’m so __. So, I’ve got a bit of a cold but other than that I’m doing well. I’m down…Uganda is an amazing place. There’s a couple of people who I did want to say that I’m praying for. Carl from Canada, you called, the quadriplegic __ it sounds like you’re having an awful time. I’m praying. Teresa in Texas with the alopecia, I really feel for you sister and I’m praying for you. And Karen from Pennsylvania, it sounds as though you’re having a very rough time and I’m praying for everyone and these couple of things are things that really made me…really touched my heart. I had a moment the other day where I was feeling a bit overwhelmed. I was standing in the supermarket and I just couldn’t work out where everything was and what to buy and everything was so different, and I didn’t understand the money. And I got so overwhelmed I cried out to Jesus in my heart. I had this beautiful image of Him standing beside me with His arm around my saying, “it’s okay Margo, we’ve got this” and I nearly cried right there. It was beautiful. And I wanted to share that because that is what your prayers are doing, allowing me to feel his peace. Okay. Love you all heaps. Bye.

Hey DAB family this is Byron out in Florida. I need you guys to pray for my son, Caleb who’s 12 years old. We’ve discovered that he’s picked up some fairly disturbing habits concerning his sexuality and we’re really concerned and worried about him. God is good because he felt bad enough about these things to confess them to us but still there’s a lot of work to be done for him to understand why these things are wrong and what he needs to do to walk the right path. We put a really tight rein on what our kids watch, what they read, and who they hang out with, but somewhere and there there’s a leak in the system for him to be doing some of the things that we’ve heard about. And he hasn’t really come forward with us about where he might’ve gotten some of these ideas from and that’s a concern. But I just need the warriors to come out and pray because the devil’s trying to take my boy. He knows the Lord, loves Him, and he’s just trying to separate him from his family and separate him from his God and separate him from himself and I can’t stand for that and I need my family pray. A lot of other stuff going on too but just if you could focus your prayers on that I’d really appreciate it. Love you all. Bye.

0 notes

connieshall · 7 years ago

Text

Lit and Phil-tacular

I recently read the Graham Greene novel Stamboul Train for the first time. The first time I read a Graham Greene novel was for a modern British literature course as an undergrad in Canada. The novel was The Power and The Glory, and I did enjoy reading it, but that isn’t the point of studying literature, is it? As this was my first Graham Greene in 20 years and outside of an academic institution, I wanted to see if I would enjoy his work a second time, in completely relaxed and voluntary circumstances. Why this book? I decided that I needed to challenge my brain a bit more and get back into proper literature - not just read Guardian reviews of proper literature.

This book - Stamboul Train - was on the end of a book shelf and had been a 50p bargain as it is a library discard. I don’t know about anyone else, but I prefer to drag a 50p discard around in my tote bag rather than a nice, shiny new Waterstones book. I don’t know how much new store-bought books actually cost now as I tend to use ebay or Oxfam for my book fixes.

This book is a Virago Classic, which means that it has a very “worthy” cover and the obligatory introduction by a contemporary author in the same field of writing as the classic novelist that you are about to read. Does anyone read these introductions? I certainly don’t, and although I like to pretend that it is because one of my undergrad professors told us never to read the introduction before the novel, the reason is that I can’t be bothered - I just want to get down to the story itself.

And, the introductions that I have read ruin the story for you. They are rather like when you are watching a crime show on the Alibi channel, and the voiceover person tells you exactly what is going to happen before the episode begins. I avoid those Alibi intros by recording the shows and zipping through to the exact moment that the episode starts. So that the intro doesn’t spoil the book for you, I would advise readers of books with introductions to read the intro after the book, rather than before.

Did I enjoy Stamboul Train? Well, it was - not surprisingly - extremely well written, but in my mellowed old (okay, middle) age, I didn’t really like any of the characters, and I really tried to. Definitely less enjoyable than my first GG foray.

As you may have gathered, the events of the novel occur as a result of characters being on a train. One of these was a novelist called Mr Savory. He takes great pride in being very popular and vetted by society hostesses that he once served as a clerk in a shop. In spite of these less-than-illustrious beginnings, Mr Savory makes a rather brilliant - in my opinion - observation about writing. The observation is about his writing, but it made me think a great deal about my own life, and what I am currently doing with it, in a professional sense, and what makes me happy. Savory says that with his literary accomplishments, he wrote “a hundred thousand words; a clerk wrote as many in an office ledger, and yet the words which he... wrote had a result that the hardest work on an office stool could not attain...”

I was immediately reminded of my own work in my local council, which I am quite proud of. However, I do write a lot of emails hassling people to get things done, or more likely, asking if I can just do the work for them as they still haven’t got around to it in three weeks of my asking them. Are my words the same as the clerk in the office ledger? I had a flash of understanding and realised that they were.

So, why don’t I do something about it and write for pleasure instead of just in a mundane office-y way? If you can dance like nobody’s watching, maybe I can write like nobody’s reading. But if people want to, that cool, too. I have, unfortunately, forgotten how to do this pleasure-writing.

To ease myself back into it, I’ve decided to write a weekly blog about the book that I am reading from the Lit and Phil. What is the Lit and Phil, you may ask? It is a private library in Newcastle upon Tyne that is still a proper library, and has been around since 1825. By “proper library” I mean a library that has a desk and stamps your books and has enough staff to actually deal with a query. Due to council cuts, local libraries are becoming rarities, which is a terrible shame, but it is not the purpose or intent of this blog to criticise the government’s policies of cuts to local councils - as there aren’t enough words to describe how crap these policies are.

The Lit and Phil is a gorgeous building that features my two favourite smells - coffee and old books. It also has over 150000 books as well as a substantial music collection. The building is also stunning - please see the website address that I will put into this blog with my limited 1999-level technology skills. Anyone can read in the library, so members of the public are more than welcome. You just have to be a member to borrow anything.

So, I’m going to write about whatever book I’m reading that week that I borrowed from the Lit and Phil. That is the only rule that I have given myself. As I also have children (and love children’s books) I will also be including the occasional - or frequent, probably - children’s book. The children’s section at the Lit and Phil is also like a dream of what a library should be. There are new books on a regular basis, with Gund animals of the Winnie the Pooh characters, a Gruffalo, and Peter Pan to name a few. They also have a plush hippogriff of Harry Potter fame, which is seriously cool. The colouring pencils and crayons available to children to colour with are excellent quality, and there is money to replace them when they need to be replaced. These elements of the children’s library are in contrast to the children’s areas in many public libraries, where cuts to funding have left their mark. I have over 17 years of public library working experience, so I am very well-acquainted with these funding issues.

I’ll post on a Friday, to start off the weekend of reading excitement properly. And just for fun - because shouldn’t everything have some fun in it? - I’m going to include a note about the best film lines ever. This week’s is from Ghostbusters (the original 1984 film of course!) - “Listen, do you smell something?”

LIt and Phil website - www.litandphil.org.uk

0 notes

autoirishlitdiscourses · 4 years ago

Text

Discourse of Sunday, 24 January 2021

As to what their artificial social relationship monogamous Christian marriage according to post-Victorian ideals demands that they can take this into account when grading your paper. I am happy to give a paper with persistent, non-trivial citation problem; incorrectly sized margins or font; use of an analysis, and is entirely understandable, but the usage in literature in English department mail room South Hall 3421 and/or, if any, are engaging in an earlier part of Ulysses in particular, I absolutely realize that students have done a good job of reading and grading papers. They've been getting quieter and quieter in section don't really know. Milly.

5%, which is to provide one. Being specific about your health should come to an oversight: there is section tonight like you received the professor's English 150 TA, is not enough points on this you connected it effectively to themes that have been a pleasure having you in section if it occurs.

If you have any questions, OK? Hello, I can post a slightly edited version of Patrick Kavanagh's I Had a Future McCabe p. You did a very good recitation and what I expect that you'll hurt my feelings by asking questions that will be helpful, and, Godot 58-59, Godot TBD, McCabe TBD McCabe TBD McCabe TBD, please let me know what you would benefit from your recitation during a week when we're discussing the selection you want to recite as soon as I can help you to do anything differently on your life, and politely introducing yourself wouldn't be a clue. All of these would have also pointed out that it is, well done!

I should say at this point would be to sit down and sketching out a lot of reasons for missing a scheduled recitation: Family death. Think about how you would need to protect yourself by managing your time and attention on what texts you see? Or, to put together an argument based on the midterm to send your lecture slideshow on Waiting for Godot/seen in the manner of an inappropriate choice. My own preference would be to have a chance to have happen is for you. Well done on this one. All of these is that each absence hurts your ability to appreciate other points of confusion regarding the penalty, so if you get by turning them into a complex historical situation. I cut this in paper comments, go further into material that you need to develop an even deeper examination of your material effectively and provided a good student this quarter, including those that best supports your main point something that warrants an F on the distrust of the quality the paper as you're capable of doing better on future writing—you've done some very good job of setting this up, you gave a thoughtful, engaged delivery, and I will not incur any penalties e. In these circumstances, you did a good job digging in to work for you? This means that, I think that one of three people reciting from Godot or from investigate or do a perfect score on the same degree of care that you tell him you want to make a final grade is not quite successful—it was my choice, and I'll accommodate you if I recall correctly, what I would like to see how much of the effacement of the play. Not the least insightful essays of anyone whose test I graded the other hand, and it looks like it's going to wind up living out amongst it.

Talking about the family relationship in The Plough and the bees are building in an assignment due via email by 12 November. I think you are perfectly capable of giving your attendance/participation score reflects this. How, exactly, are they representative of how ideology is thought to be more explicit, I think that, and gave a very good textual accuracy; impassioned sense of a text that you will put in a lot of payoff for the quarter started?

I left them in detail, but spending some interpretive effort on is talking about the relationship between the poem, its mythical background, contemporary politics, religion, nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or a drunken buffoon to have been doing. I said verbally, any number of people the characters who question whether the walkers should be killed except as a whole, and on a form at this point, thematically, to be crying about?

But I will do when you're going to be successful in doing an excellent job of putting them next to each other in a way that you might, if I recall correctly: once during the night. Question will be posted on the final itself to me to interpret them. I'll give away add codes as quickly as I just heard back from doing even better on future papers. That is to make an explicit statement about this, you must email me a copy of an analysis whose relevance is questionable, or play too much difficulty; there are a lot of ways. But you're quite bright and articulate prose that was simply people getting more than it currently looks like people have done some very intriguing suggestions, but just that there is a good job of covering a large number of points for section participation. That's OK. I appreciate your thoughtful and impassioned delivery. 4:30 you are planning on having students declare in advance from the famous Kilmainham Gaol Pike p. So you can instantiate a logical reasoning process for the quarter also discussed in more detail. And then give an impassioned delivery, and let me know if you want any changes made that are not obligated to look at the time. I count the entire thing; perusing the index might pay off, not to castigate you, because that will be you can make it completely impossible to complete an English author. 57. I'm downtown not far from lower State, but Seamus Heaney: discussion of the text you will receive a non-attenders to make it up. If you happen to have a sense of the play. Academic practices, which I think that your paper is that I'm perfectly convinced that you have a final selection for what is Mary likely to be a comparatively easy revision process. Prestigious Academic Senate awards for distinguished professors and TAs are open for you, with absolutely everything in the text. But if you're willing to meet. Of course, in part because it will help you here even though you still think it prevented you from the rest as backups in case you don't schedule immediately, you have any other questions, though. I'm not just because you're not capable, because I will let the class, and this is probably too late to pick them up today, and I'll print it out in section is your job to make sure that I'll be awake for a grad seminar several years ago that discusses several critical approaches to this question would help to get back to you because, well done! I suspect that one way to the video on the time, and you met them at their level of familiarity with the professor in our department, Candace Waid, just sending me a rough outline of your ideas. Take another look through the tabs. Believe it or not.

I don't grade you can be found here on my section website after your recitation on Tuesday, October 11, which is not just a bit more so that it's impossible to say, Google Scholar when you were my student again for a reason that I notice that the option of knowing what you would have needed to be available to, you want to go to the rhythm of the text that you're OK, too, that it didn't keep me waiting on you in section, got people talking about, say, I think that the probability that she's just feeling overwhelmed by finals. Either choice is a good choice for a four-thirds of a conversation with about his rather anguished disappointment with the difference that you haven't yet written it, in turn, based on your main topic, but you're the boss says. But you really want to recite from McCabe this week to read. The point totals for either exam. History, section III, The Second Sin 2. 292, p.

#Irish literature #automatically generated text #Patrick Mooney #Python #Markov chains

0 notes

autoirishlitdiscourses · 8 years ago

Text

Discourse of Monday, 10 April 2017

I'll see whether you think it's inherently inappropriate to use to construct an overall grade for the quarter, you fail automatically policy/, a quite high A-for the term, and I am so sorry to take a shot at getting people to speak with me or with the section website: Pre-1971 British and Irish literature. Just a reminder email I sent you:/Ulysses/alas, recording is of course, as always, silence will force someone to speak if no one else has already signed up for a long time, I think that that's what you'd like. Lust: A characteristic of the title page and copyright pages because there's a larger-scale details and building your very rare moments of suboptimal phrasing, etc. Also, one of the poem by noon this Wednesday. You've been very punctual this quarter I have to wait longer after asking a question that you could get a passing grade, you really have shown that you intend to accept an F was a difficult text. Then structure your presentation tomorrow! It may very well-chosen pieces of virtually any kind Henry V's famous St. Finally, for the positions we take in the romance meta-narrative path through your texts; it is constructed in the literal sense of having them fresh in everyone's mind, if you go back over a draft is the general reading of the above course assignments must be killed except as a fully capable member of a discussion leader for the midterm to avoid being forced to displace your recitation from Ulysses in front of a small observation: I think, too, for instance.

What do you want to ruin it for a job well done. The short version is that if you'd like. If you choose a good weekend, as I am not currently checked out, but this is so very quickly.

You can use as discussion questions are some provocative hints but need to take so long as fifteen minutes if you want me to. Here's a breakdown on your feet when people disagreed with you and the overall purpose of the reasons that I feel bad about that. Again, I'm sorry to take a look at some point of analysis is will depend on where you found it yet or hadn't, when it was fun having you in section on 27 November will have definite ideas about what you want to recite. Good luck with grading or depressed about grad school with my seminar papers. I think that several things would, I think that there is a useful tool to help you to draw the full recording. Your writing is clear and engaging and often used the more interesting way to set next to each other in achieving that goal. You picked a good student this quarter. Doing a very solid manner to fully demonstrate solid payoffs for those who are advocates of reform as a psychiatrist but his personal experience it can be. In that series, which I scribble notes about the family relationship in The Butcher Boy I accidentally siphoned it off with a worn pick, OK? I'll be looking forward to your paper as effective as it is—and you've also shown that you could do a very solid and reasonable offer. Of course, let me know if you have very good work for you this quarter, to put everything you turn in your phrasing here will help you if you can't adhere to anything in particular texts side by side? Any time is OK with me. You had a B. I need a middle A. I will pass out a reminder that I provide an estimate based on the day grading so that people run up against was that I would never write that on the final, a free Excel clone. In other words, you've got a lot of ways to do so by staying in the topic—but rather attempts to gloss over anything, she was born, running to knock up Mrs Thorton in Denzille street. Be excellent. So, what kinds of things that are difficult to find that action of little importance Though never indifferent. It was a much stronger delivery than the Yank versions. I'll see you next week. This includes your midterm and final exams, and what it means for this paper pay off here. There are two potential problems that are important aspects of your narrative strands together effectively, demonstrated a strong manner here. You picked an important passage and you should spend at least that passage I take to be on that level. I will post your recitation needs to happen for your approval, then by tomorrow, but where I think make sure that you will incur a penalty for backing out at the Recitation Assignment Guidelines handout. In a lot of similarities to yours, and I think reasons. I think that incorporating not just providing an analysis of a text that will help your grade in the course website, because unless you indicate clearly that that's what you're actually using, and b includes the recitation assignment write-up midterm after I qualified the who's done the reading. Have a good student and absolutely everything calculated except for the course, you should go if you kept your attention more closely at one section, writing an analysis, would benefit from and to be substantial deviations from the section as a whole. Have a wonderful poem and its background. I think that you have either. I really enjoyed having you in section to discuss the general reading of the group as a way that shows you paid close attention to the specifics of the entire class. Like I said on my shelf at home or on campus Friday afternoon your notes? —I've marked ask if you're treating the text itself will, of course perfectly happy to hear it and so forth. Your initial explication was thoughtful showed that you'd have to drop back into lecture mode instead of concrete ones. I won't assess participation until the very end will be on the final! I will announce it in contractual terms to the very first paragraph in the play as a scholar with the critical discourses surrounding the texts that you want to do, because I think it is—but being clear and effective and productive, though, I think that articulating a solid job here, and though this may wind up being able to exhibit rational control over those emotions; and, again, this is definitely a strong job!

60 minutes to make them pay off to the research resources on the sheet handed out today to be careful about with this one time if you want any changes made that are not, let me know. That is, again, this is of course materials can be hard to draw deeper into issues raised in orphanages, or you otherwise want me to hold two people who are friends of mine and whom I suspect you over the line. /always/perfectly OK to ask people to examine nuances, and that tonight was not assigned in class that you do well on both outlines, and Ocean's Bad Religion was a mispronunciation of surmise that broke the poem's rhythm and how much of the Catholic doctrines on temptation, which I scribble notes about the very first paragraph in the manner of A-paper gets not 90% the low end.

It's not necessary to read this term, and these are important aspects to it, and/or capability. You Are Old Yeats, The Song of the entire class, then let me do so, or we can meet on Sunday or Monday if you're going to select.

Lust generally involves invoking one or more appropriate lens to tell us about the ways in which you want to make up your paper's structure, and different societies mean very different. I think including at least apparently reaction to it, and what does it really mean to say and interacted with the benefit of disputing with a web browser that supports a disputable claim, because it's a passionate selection that shows you paid close attention to how other people. I feel that it's difficult to treat each other effectively while in the writing process is also a Ulysses recitation tomorrow. As another example, three people reciting from Godot tomorrow. Are Old. 3 in Opened Ground. Whatever's best for you, let me know if you need suggestions about where you're going nor do I necessarily believe these things, you should consider not because I think, to be more specific on several web sites that matches several pages from it into Google turned up a productive choice for you. Thank you again for being such a strong job. I'll give you a grade by Friday afternoon your notes and underlining, should you desire one; this means that he has decided to postpone releasing the midterm would result in further disciplinary action even if it works with your paper and revise, your grade: A shovel. I have been implicit more often would help to get you one tomorrow if they cover ground which you want to go, though. So, what I would like to put them together, then let me know if you don't know that I've made some real doozies I just got an interesting contemporary poet, as outlined in my office hours due to nervousness and/or make interpretation difficult in this regard, because there are any problems with these definitions if, gods forbid, I think it will eventually force someone to speak with me in person instead of assuming that the stereotypes of Irish culture in favor of asking questions that go straight for it to larger-scale judgments about the offer. You've been very punctual this quarter, so if you've scheduled a recitation of Stephen and Haines's it seems to me this long to get 5/5 of the other TA notices you're there during attendance, I think that practicing a bit of wiggle room. I think that there are things that are not major, it's not as useful that way, I think that a close relationship to each other and how they pay off as much as it could spread your focus out; if you're stressed or would you characterize O'Casey's portrayal of the poem, and I will give you does not merely adequate, but whether that's meant to signify I don't know whether they'll actually wind up with answers to your presentation. Thanks for letting me know if you do well. I take my pedagogical responsibilities seriously, and an. Again, you should definitely both be there on time. So, the Riverside is a recurrent element in your current grade is calculated. 46: A jail. The study of 'Ulysses' is, and maybe ten or twelve have managed to respond to it to be time management you've only got ten to fifteen minutes. On the paper as a parody of military recruitment videos in an American work, you should be set next to each other in a complex one, I made some real contributions in a late paper/must/attend or reschedule, and then mercilessly edited your paper and turning it in the directions you want to have thought it; b it's OK with me at least five discussion sections must be restrained in order to pass them out, but being flexible may be that this has not yet done the reading yet, and you related it well in several ideas about it more will also choose any poem at all times.

However, this is a broad home.

And what kind of interesting. There are two common practices that students have a thesis yet or didn't hear this: the twelfth episode, Cyclops, in relation to Punishment and of the term. I'll bring for you. But you really have done a lot of ways.

2 notes · View notes

autoirishlitdiscourses · 8 years ago

Text

Discourse of Wednesday, 22 February 2017

Here's the email that says that you made concessions to the larger-scale, but you did quite a solid job, and I've gone ahead and send me no later than Sunday afternoon, we could meet on campus on Monday. I am myself less than absolutely perfectly optimal. In practice, a productive direction to take advantage of this, I had the answers to these rules: people who attended last night's optional review session.

What is his point? I've ever worked with. I think that this novel really wraps up the section website that illustrates correct formatting according to the novel. If you have any questions, or a course TA during tests; please ensure that he must resist lest he succumb and forego his identity look at Walter essay Theses on the final, or otherwise need to have practiced a bit nervous, but that you won't have time to get graded first this Wednesday the original authors whose texts you're working with? Not feeling well. I think. I said in the delivery itself that is experienced in attaining those results. /after/the first people to dig in to the central claim that you're making. And how does the novel. There were several ways that you write eight full pages—even if you get behind. One example of the poem itself, you should be the same way and space another, but also identifying the sources that disagree with you about the text that throws some aspect of the paper as a whole talking. 6 p. Does this help? What this means, essentially, is holding a midterm review sheet for his opinion directly in section this week in which hawthorn bushes often mark a boundary between this world and the standard essay format has to be changed than send a new document. I'd rather you did well here, though this is not a demand, because the writing process.

It was a smart, articulate, sophisticated paper here is demonstrating that the formula above is actually the more recent versions at all, you've got an email saying that you had thought about it from being in class, and went above and beyond the final, or deviates only rarely, and overall you did quite a while for discussion with the dates that would have been done even more insightful work on future assignments—you've demonstrated this quite clearly and manage to pick for you to push your argument, but do contain major announcements and the next, Keats's Ode to Psyche, the paper to problematize the issues involved in farming note the spelling of her grad seminars; approaching her with specific lines and each piece of worthless land. What you've outlined a good job of setting up an opportunity to demonstrate what a bright student you are also welcome to send me a copy of your analysis on its own take on religion requires that a contemporary English poet might be exactly, I suspect will be, and though it would have helped you to 97%. 64; and, if you re-read. You picked an important part of the starling but I think that it turned out to me that your discussion could have been missing section generally did pretty poorly. I hope you had an A paper; and any other questions, OK? Let me know and we'll find a relationship that he was in use and the context of the handout yourself, then do come to a donkey. Hear his voice in the discussion keep going past ten minutes as part of the text, though, you've been working over the course website; if you're trying to get me an email letting me know your final grade at the time that you'll get other people in section don't really know. You have really perceptive set of arguments about a more natural rhythm. There are probably good ways to read your selected bibliography into sections indicating status Works Cited and Works Consulted would be central to some of the reasons why the IRA's treatment of his lecture pace rather than treating them as a whole. On a related note, you should come to a woman's affections and body by developing a feeling of gratitude for doing such a good holiday break! I think that your score was 46%. Sent home with no explanation of the discussion and got the class more, though, there's no overlap in terms of participation. Let me know what works best. This is one of the paper is one of my observations are based on Yeats's poetry may tie into developments in Irish: English translation: The jack o' lantern: a they were sick. Explains how I am much less true for more sections that just yours, and went above and beyond the length requirements. November 27th, excluding 13 November is good and your writing is so good, thoughtful, well done! You could theoretically also file a petition. Works for me if you want to reschedule, and your thought so sophisticated that they don't immediately jump to where you'd like. You reacted gracefully to questions from less abstraction to more specific in the manner of an excerpt from a B-paper gets not 90% the low end. Section Guidelines handout. Awesome!

You can take some reasonable guesses. You might profitably compare/contrast with other students in the middle of the two elements, that there are currently at a mutually agreeable time for someone who is the overall result of a pound into 240 pence 240 d or informally 240 p. All in all, are there not other places in my paper-grading rubric composed entirely of Samuel Beckett: The Soldier's Song Irish national anthem in Irish literature. Shift p. You allowed the group is not the discussions following them. That being said, looking closely at the review session, Pre-1971 British and Irish currency on the professor's reading is the distinction between individual Irishmen and-women. 608-613; p.

Her Lover are very very lucid and compelling, and fixing these problems, but will push you up out of it individually. The Music Box/1932: There is section this week. All of these is that it's actually not that you and think about how you're using the texts, rather than moving around on the topic has been fun to have sympathy for Francie, and you keep an eye on your new topic if you have a fair argument overall, but I re-reading skills on at the absolute best documents that should be careful about with this phrase in the way, would pay off as a scholar with the rest of the work that you've thought carefully about the novel reward? I really liked it. Get better. It is your job to do everything required for all that you will have to say, and not the number that you look at exceptions to these rules: people who attend section Thanksgiving week, though, so I do not grade you can see that, as documented in the back of my students, followed by all readers/viewers of the poem by noon this Wednesday.

You've put it another way to find that the exceptions are more interesting way to add one potential reading of the paper to you having the bottom of a romance relationship by among other things you may find it helpful to take the final, attended every section including the fact that the option of reciting from McCabe during 27 November. Participatory-ness, I haven't yet or hadn't, when it comes time to meet. Hi! 5 p. You with comments before the other Godot group for several hours tonight. New document on course website let me know what that is bitter and mysterious. Well done on this. I didn't have to get back to you. The Butcher Boy would give you an updated grade by Friday it's my other section's turn to get me at least once in my mailbox South Hall 2635 which is not inherently bad tools for writing, though, you did quite an excellent job here is to simply remind the class, so you should continue to attend those classes and do a wonderful poem and connect them to the group without driving them, in another format, nor that it would be to have substantial overlap with yours, though never seriously enough to have a/genuinely extraordinary circumstances.

0 notes