Tumgik
#footage belongs to getty images
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Vincent Price signing autographs at Tomb of Ligeia movie premiere (1964)
Footage courtesy of Getty images
80 notes · View notes
novumtimes · 8 days
Text
Russian $50M Combat Jet Shot Down Over Black Sea: Ukraine Video
One of Russia’s most advanced aircraft was shot down over the Black Sea, Ukraine’s defense intelligence has said, as it released a video that purports to show the destruction of the fighter jet worth tens of millions of dollars. The Defense Intelligence of Ukraine (DIU) said one of its units used a man-portable air defense system (MANPAD) to target the Sukhoi Su-30SM warplane which has a price tag of around $50 million. The DIU said that the jet had belonged to the 43rd Separate Naval Aviation Regiment of the Russian Air Force, based at Saky airfield in occupied Crimea. It had gone missing from radar around 5 a.m. Tuesday, sparking a search-and-rescue operation involving An-26 aircraft and Mi-8 and Ka-27 helicopters, it said. “The invaders reported to the command about a characteristic slick of aviation fuel found in the sea, 70 kilometers northwest of Cape Tarkhankut, and soon saw the wreckage of the destroyed Su-30SM,” the DIU statement said, according to a translation. This illustrative image shows Russian Sukhoi SU-35S Sukhoi jet fighters aircrafts during the MAKS-2021 International Aviation and Space Salon, on July 20, 2021, in Zhukovskiy, outside of Moscow, Russia. Footage released by Ukrainian defense intelligence… This illustrative image shows Russian Sukhoi SU-35S Sukhoi jet fighters aircrafts during the MAKS-2021 International Aviation and Space Salon, on July 20, 2021, in Zhukovskiy, outside of Moscow, Russia. Footage released by Ukrainian defense intelligence purports to show the destruction of a Sukhoi Su-30SM warplane. More Mikhail Svetlov/Getty Images Aerial footage shows the aircraft flying across the sky and the clip then cuts to an explosion in the sky, prompting a strong reaction from social media users. “Destruction of Su-30SM jet by a MANPADS missile from GUR boat in the Black Sea near Crimea-2 drilling rig,” posted X user C4H10FO2P next to the 53-second video. X user OSINTtechnical wrote on X: “Ukrainian special forces successfully shot down a Russian Naval Aviation Su-30SM multirole fighter while raiding a Black Sea oil platform Tuesday. It appears one Ukrainian MANPADS team scored a hit on the Russian fighter (with a spot from a circling Ukrainian drone).” “Another huge loss for the Russian Air Force as an Su-30SM fighter jet went down near Crimea,” posted X user Rod Francis. “It’s one of Russia’s best aircraft and is a modernized multi-role jet. It’s a financial hit of $50M for Putin. Too bad, so sad.” Russian-language social media channels had earlier reported the disappearance and search for the multi-role fighter aircraft whose NATO reporting name is Flanker-C/G/H). It had fired four Kh-31P anti-radiation missiles toward mainland Ukraine during its mission, according to the Telegram channel Crimean Wind. The Russian Defense Ministry said on Tuesday that its forces had thwarted Ukraine’s attempt to regain control of the Krym-2 drilling rig in the Black Sea but there is no evidence that the events are connected. Newsweek has contacted the Russian defense ministry for comment. It is the latest aviation mishap involving a Russian military aircraft. Last month, an Mi-8 helicopter carrying approximately 20 people went missing. In June, the crew of a Russian Su-34 warplane was killed in a crash east of the Black Sea, during a training flight in Russia’s North Ossetia-Alania, a small Russian republic on the border with Georgia. Source link via The Novum Times
0 notes
f1 · 1 year
Text
Pitt stop: actor Brad takes to Silverstone track as Formula One meets Hollywood
With Formula One hosting Brad Pitt and a full-scale film production at the British Grand Prix this weekend making a movie about the sport with Lewis Hamilton as a producer, the two different worlds have adapted remarkably well to make the project come together at Silverstone. The film about Formula One, as yet unnamed, opened filming this weekend in front of the fans with the British Grand Prix as both set and backdrop. The fictional 11th team, APX, has its own garage and pitwall stand for drivers Sonny Hayes, Pitt’s character, and Joshua Pearce, played by British actor Damson Idris. They are running an F2 car converted to look like an F1 car for filming between the usual sessions and races that make up the weekend. Hamilton has been involved from the off and on Friday the Mercedes team principal, Toto Wolff, explained how the team too had been closely involved in the process. “I spoke to the director a few weeks ago expecting him to say he was in Hollywood,” said Wolff. “He said: ‘I am in my apartment in Brackley’, so it’s not all great being a movie director …” “We were involved pretty early when they had the first discussions. We sent Brad to a driving school in France, going through the formula cars from Formula 4 all the way up and that was important.” The picture is being made by Apple Original Films, directed by Joseph Kosinski, who made Top Gun: Maverick, and is produced by Jerry Bruckheimer, a long-time successful Hollywood producer. There has been a strong commitment to making the film as accurate and believable as possible, as Wolff explained. “We tried to be helpful with the narrative,” he said. “Lewis is a producer and he wanted to make sure that when the movie comes out it is as realistic as possible. It’s a very, very good narrative and then there is the effort they put in. “We helped them to use an F2 car and build the bodywork around it so it looks like an F1 car. The garage and the pitwall, all of that, we tried to be helpful and gave them the design so they could be as realistic as possible. When you go into the garage the whole set-up behind is really unbelievable.” The film has the full support of F1, which sees it as another way to further draw in a new audience that have come to the sport in recent years, especially with the popularity of the Drive To Survive series. The mocked-up garage belonging to Pitt’s character, Sonny Hayes, in Apex. Photograph: Dan Istitene/Formula 1/Getty Images Pitt, who is 59 and who has been advised by Hamilton, will play a veteran driver returning to F1 after some time out of the sport. He will drive the car this weekend and the film crew will also shoot the race itself using 20 cameras, the two separate sets of footage will then be merged putting Pitt and his fictional team apparently in the heart of the action. skip past newsletter promotion after newsletter promotion In the genuine article during F1 practice Max Verstappen was the star of the show again. He led first practice for Red Bull, almost half a second up on his teammate Sergio Pérez. In the afternoon session Verstappen was once more on top. He was in fine form at the old airfield but was far from having it all his own way, pushed very hard by last year’s winner, Ferrari’s Carlos Sainz, who was just two-hundredths of a second behind. Williams’ Alex Albon also enjoyed a productive day, third in both sessions. Mercedes struggled, however, George Russell was 12th and Lewis Hamilton 15th in free practice two. Verstappen goes into the tenth round of the season with a commanding lead in the world championship, 81 points clear of Pérez and looking for his sixth consecutive win in his 150th start for Red Bull. His team remain unbeaten in all nine meetings thus far this season. via Formula One | The Guardian https://www.theguardian.com/sport/formulaone
0 notes
Text
When a creative material’s copyright lapses, it enters the public domain, which means it is no longer subject to trademarks, patents, or intellectual property rights. No individual, company, author, or artist owns it, and it belongs to the public. If this is the case, why is some public domain footage so expensive? This is the question at the core of Richard Misek’s short film “A History of the World According to Getting Images” in which he explores how historically significant footage from newsreels, government agencies, and pioneers of film are “held captive” behind paywalls.
[link to video]
0 notes
coochiequeens · 3 years
Text
The man busted for the hate-fueled attack on an Asian woman in Midtown was out on parole for killing his own mother back in 2002, authorities said Wednesday.
Brandon Elliot, 38, who lives in a nearby hotel that serves as a homeless shelter, was arrested early Wednesday and hit with a number of charges, including assault as a hate crime and attempted assault as a hate crime, police said.
He was caught on video mercilessly punching and kicking the 65-year-old victim in front of an apartment building at 360 West 43rd Street around 11:40 a.m. Monday, yelling “F–k you, you don’t belong here,” according to cops and police sources.
In April 2002, Elliot was charged with murder for using a kitchen knife to stab his mother, Bridget Johnson in the chest three times in their East 224th Street home in the Bronx, according to previous reports.
Johnson, 42, died a couple days later. It’s unclear what led to the fatal attack.
The man busted for the attack on an Asian woman in Midtown was out on parole for killing his own mother back in 2002, authorities said.DCPI
Elliot was convicted of murder and sentenced to 15 years-to-life in prison and was released on parole in November 2019, state corrections records show.
He was previously arrested in 2000 for robbery, cops said.
The broad daylight beatdown on Monday stoked outrage after the surveillance footage showed witnesses — including building workers — doing nothing to intervene.
One of the building employees even appears to shut the door to the building as the attacker flees.
Brandon Elliot mercilessly punched and kicked the 65-year-old victim in front of an apartment building at 360 West 43 Street, cops say.Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
Elliot allegedly kicked the victim to the ground — then stomped on her head several times as she was down on the sidewalk.
Staff members at 360 West 43rd Street were suspended over their apparent inaction.
The victim suffered a broken pelvis and was taken to the hospital. She was later released.
Elliot’s latest bust comes in the wake of a surge of attacks against Asian victims in New York City and elsewhere.
The NYPD has recorded a 1,300-percent increase in hate crimes against Asian Americans since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
He killed his own mother and then attacked another woman that was old enough to be his mother. This time let him rot in jail. Women deserve to be safe from this guy.
1 note · View note
makistar2018 · 6 years
Link
Taylor Swift review - tour shows a star, and reputation, still in ascendance
4 out of 5 stars.    
Optus Stadium, Perth: Snakeskin outfits and hit medleys inspire sold out opening show of the Australian leg of her Reputation tour
Tumblr media
Taylor Swift on stage at Optus stadium, Perth. Photograph: Don Arnold/TAS18/Getty Images 
So many matching outfits. Mothers and daughters, brothers, sisters related and otherwise, converged upon Perth’s still-new Optus Stadium, for a Friday night out that seemed a touch more fabulous than most of them usually are.
If there was any doubt that Taylor Swift inspires her audience, it was laid to rest here at the opening night of the Australian leg of her Reputation tour. Jumpsuits, sequined jackets and snakeskin outfits referenced video clips and song titles. There’s a sophistication about Taylor Swift that can be shared by tots, teens and twentysomethings… and their mums (and dads). It’s perhaps the reason why Swift’s star is still in ascendance, certainly in comparison to her rival, Katy Perry, who on her most recent visit, struggled to fill Perth’s 15,000-seat RAC Arena. On this night, 50,900 flocked to see Swift with the mega-venue proclaimed ‘sold-out’.
Even as Broods and the increasingly-popular CharlieXCX warmed up the audience, it was all about waiting for Tay-Tay. In the minutes leading up to the headliner’s set, the huge fortress-like stage structure projected behind-the-scenes clips of Swift rehearsing, performing, laughing and living, only broken by rounds of trivia questions and advertisements for Swift’s music (and Fuji Film).
That and footage of fans on Skype screens and outside stadiums proclaiming their undying love. It was not bursting the bubble, it was making the bubble bigger. This was a night – and audience – captivated by ultra-fame and the cult of a kind of celebrity that cannot be ignored.
Joan Jett’s Bad Reputation faded as the lights dimmed and the PA and screens poured out talk-show soundbytes (‘all this drama is exhausting!’) about the woman of the moment. Taylor Swift made a striking entrance. No elevation or descent, simply walking out from behind a curtain bathed in brilliant white light, in what was a real ‘now I’m here’ moment, as Freddie Mercury would once have put it. Ready For It was an appropriate and compelling opener, quickly followed by I Did Something Bad, with fireworks making a dynamic presence in the night-sky in what was still only the second song.
A multitude of dancers backed Swift all the way, as multiple video screens deftly captured all action and every angle. Swift’s eye contact with the cameras was spot-on, giving face-time to those seated in the rafters as much as those in the front rows. It was amazingly intimate given the scope of machinery and production.
While Swift threw her hat into the political news-cycle last week with an Instagram post informing her 112 million Instagram followers that she would be voting for two Tennessee Democrats in the US congressional mid-term elections next month, this night was not about proclamations or apologies about Donald Trump (who now it seems, likes her “25% less”). It was about glimpses of her identity (true and public) and empowerment for all, as she thanked her dancers, band, supports acts and crew at length throughout the evening. Swift also noted that she was the first woman to headline at Optus Stadium (her pal Ed Sheeran opened the venue to live music in March and is the only other artist to have so far performed at it).
Interestingly, for a huge mainstream artist, the show was not as much of a hit-fest as some may have been clamouring for, with much of the set focussed on material from Swift’s latest album, Reputation, while other songs were incorporated into medleys (Style/Love Story/You Belong With Me and, later, Bad Blood Should’ve Said No). Swift the viper/vixen stormed the huge stage and took time out to be airlifted to two remote stages in the midst of the audience.
With such a huge production and occasionally processed vocals it seemed heartening and important when Swift was alone with an acoustic guitar (Dancing With Our Hands Tied/I Knew You Were Trouble) or behind a piano (Long Live/New Year’s Day) as these were moments that focussed on the talented artist rather than the showbusiness of it all.
That doesn’t mean, however, that Swift can’t power it up for hits such as Blank Space, Shake It Off and We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together, or have a giant, inflatable cobra and video/lighting effects that made the audience feel like they were inside a pinball machine (with the ball very much in control). The reptilian imagery is testimony to the fall-outs and backlash of her fame, but the gestures are sweeping enough to entertain and inspire tens of thousands of people across the other side of the globe in their favourite new football stadium.
All up it was a joyous showcase of a famous life writ large, with the majority of the audience probably liking Swift ‘25% more’. Sometimes, like this time, you just can’t argue with joy.
The Guardian
5 notes · View notes
classyfoxdestiny · 3 years
Text
Horror at Kabul’s gate to freedom #ٹاپسٹوریز
New Post has been published on https://mediaboxup.com/horror-at-kabuls-gate-to-freedom/
Horror at Kabul’s gate to freedom
Tumblr media
| Special report
Inside the final deadly moments of the US’ longest-running war
By Nick Paton Walsh, Sandi Sidhu, Julia Hollingsworth, Masoud Popalzai, Sitara Zamani, Abdul Basir Bina, Katie Polglase and Gianluca Mezzofiore
February 8, 2022
On August 26, 2021, a blast ripped through a crowd outside Kabul airport. More than 180 people were confirmed dead, including 13 American troops.
The Pentagon says all were killed by an ISIS-K bomb.
A CNN investigation raises questions over whether some may have been shot.
Thursday, August 26, 2021 17:36:52 p.m.
The blast ripped through the desperate mass of people outside Kabul airport, turning the sewage canal they’d been standing in red with body parts and blood.
Shogofa Hamidi opened her eyes to find the air thick with smoke, she said. Bodies had fallen on top of each other, and human flesh had splattered onto her face and into her mouth. The travel documents she had been holding had turned to ash.
Around her, people were screaming and wailing. Within minutes, according to Shogofa, the shooting started.
What happened next is part of the untold — and still disputed — story of the attack on Abbey Gate.
Tumblr media
Clothes and blood stains in the sewage canal following the blast. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
Tumblr media
Backpacks and belongings of Afghans who were waiting to be evacuated. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
The Pentagon said Friday all 170 Afghans and 13 United States service members who died that day were killed in the blast. A three-and-a-half-month US military investigation involving interviews with 139 people concluded that while US Marines opened fire twice after the blast, none of the bullets hit anyone, according to a detailed media briefing by the investigating team on February 4.
The British military say their troops fired into the air to clear a pressing crowd, but nobody was hit. ISIS-K claimed responsibility for the bombing, which caused the highest US death toll from a single incident in Afghanistan in more than a decade.
But a four-month CNN investigation raises hard questions over what really happened that day — and how so many people died.
CNN spoke to more than 70 witnesses and families of the dead, reviewed medical records and analyzed video, photos and audio of the scene. Medical staff and administrators at five hospitals that received victims from the attack noted the presence of bullet wounds, and one doctor described removing bullets himself. Hospital statements and patients’ medical records reference bullet wounds. Survivors and families of some of the dead insisted some of the dead and wounded were shot.
Two forensic blast analysts said it was unlikely that so many people could have died in a single person-borne explosion, though other experts told CNN it was possible.
But there are limits to what can be learned. Autopsies are not common in Afghanistan, leaving the medical assessments inconclusive. Video from social media and the military is spotty, and there are gaps in the timeline of events where no footage seems to exist. There are limits to the US military investigation as well. Investigators did not speak to any staff at Afghanistan hospitals or medical staff outside of the US military. Nor did they interview any Afghan civilians.
Still, the information obtained by CNN raises the possibility that gunfire could have played a role in injuries and deaths on that terrible day, despite American and British military denials. This reporting prompts questions about whether the full story has been told about military conduct in the aftermath of the blast.
How it happened
In the days leading up to the blast, Afghans thronged around the perimeter of Kabul airport, clamoring for a flight out of the city.
The Taliban had taken the capital on August 15, plunging the country back into the hands of a repressive regime the US and its allies had fought for almost 20 years to repel.
By August 26, the desperation outside the airport’s walls was at its peak.
Tumblr media
A US Marine at Hamid Karzai International Airport on August 26, 2021. Credit: Staff Sgt. Victor Mancilla/US Marine Corps/Reuters
Tumblr media
People gather near an evacuation control checkpoint on the perimeter of Kabul airport on August 26, 2021. Credit: Wali Sabawoon/AP
Tumblr media
Afghans attempting to flee the country try to reach foreign forces outside Kabul airport on August 26, 2021. Credit: Akhter Gulfam/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
The US soldiers were just five days away from their deadline to leave and the risks were increasing of an ISIS-K attack. The US Embassy in Kabul warned people to stay away from the airport, unless specifically invited by a US representative.
But the crowds came anyway. Some Afghans arrived at the airport clutching visas or passports for other countries. Others held only hope that they would somehow be ushered through the airport gates.
After the capital fell, thousands of Afghans gathered daily at Hamid Karzai International Airport.
It was the main US evacuation route out of the country and the last place in the capital still under US control.
But getting into the airport — and out of the country — wasn’t easy.
Afghans needed to get through one of the airport gates — and for many, that meant going through Abbey Gate.
Some evacuees stood in a sewage canal that runs along the perimeter of the airport, waving their documents.
Then evacuees needed to get past the allied forces manning the entrance.
This satellite photo shows crowds gathering at the Abbey Gate checkpoint on August 25 — the day before the blast.
The following day, a suspected suicide bomber would detonate an explosive near Abbey Gate.
In the hours before the August 26 blast, video shows people massing near the razor-wire fence guarded by allied troops that separated them from the airport.
Watch what it was like on the ground
Shogofa and her sister Morsal were among the crowd of people standing in the filthy sewage stream, hoping to show their travel documents to French soldiers. Morsal, then 17, had been accepted to a French university and her sister and parents had been told they could evacuate with her.
Nearby, Ahmad, who does not wish to use his real name for safety reasons, was standing with more than a dozen of his family members, including women and children. Some clutched bags stuffed with clothes and belongings for the journey.
Unlike thousands of others, they had valid travel documents: One was a US citizen, some had green cards, and another obtained a visa after working for the Americans.
Shortly before the blast, most of Ahmad’s family had crossed the sewage canal to the area near where US troops were checking documents. The men were passing up the last of their luggage behind them.
Then the bomb detonated…
“The sky turned red with dust.”
“The canal was filled with blood.”
“There was a mountain of dead bodies.”
“(I saw) pieces of human limbs and clothes flying in the air.”
Some Afghans were killed instantaneously. Others were thrown to the ground. On the airport side of the canal, foreign troops lay dead or injured, according to witnesses. Others were still blocking the gate to the airport as dazed Afghans struggled to their feet.
As Shogofa lay in a pile of bodies, she said she saw soldiers in American uniforms rush to pull their injured comrades to safety. Then Shogofa says she saw troops firing on injured Afghans.
“I saw people who were injured in the explosion trying to get up, but they fired on them,” she said.
Shogofa felt someone pulling on her head. It was her sister Morsal, who was bleeding and moving her mouth as if to call her sister’s name, but was unable to speak.
“There was so much blood coming out of her face, like a faucet running full of blood,” Shogofa said.
“There was no shooting in the air. They were targeting people. It was intentional”
Nazir, an eyewitness
Morsal had been hit by shrapnel in the shoulder in the blast but was still able to stand. Shortly after the blast, she said she also saw soldiers firing on those who were standing. Then a bullet struck her jaw and came out the right side of her neck, she said. A medical report from the Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center in Kabul, seen by CNN, confirmed she had been hit by a bullet.
Nineteen witnesses said they either saw people being hit by gunfire or were hit by gunfire themselves. While CNN has not been able to verify each witness account of seeing gunfire, it adds to the pressing questions the US military faces over the incident.
When he came to after the explosion, Ahmad leapt into the canal, where he found his cousin, Mohammad, injured but conscious. He pulled him to the side of the putrid water. As Ahmad tried to help his other relatives, he saw a bullet strike Mohammad’s forehead, killing him instantly.
Tumblr media
This medical report from the Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center in Kabul diagnoses Morsal with a “B.I.” — or bullet injury — to the left side of her face. Credit: Supplied
Tumblr media
This death certificate notes that Mohammad died from “shot injury and blast injuries.” Credit: Supplied
Nazir, 16, who was at the airport with his brother, his brother’s wife and their children, said the shooting seemed to start straight after the explosion.
“There was no shooting in the air. They were targeting people. It was intentional,” he said. “In front of me, people were getting shot at and falling down.”
Another survivor, Noorullah Zakhel, was also standing in the canal when the blast went off. He said he turned to his cousin, Suhail, who appeared uninjured by the blast. “Run,” he said.
Noorullah said he heard shooting as he clambered up the canal wall, so he dropped to the ground and hid among dead bodies. Noorullah noted that the bullets seemed to hit those who tried to flee, so he turned to a family lying next to him and said: “Please don’t run, they will shoot you.”
He recalled soldiers standing in front of him. “They said nothing — they just shooted people.” The next day, Noorullah’s family told him that Suhail had died after being hit by what appeared to be a bullet.
Who fired shots
The US military confirmed only American and British troops were in the area at the time — but they say witnesses who claim to have seen people being shot were mistaken.
“The testimony you describe is not inconsistent with the recollections of people with jumbled memories from a concussive event who witnessed trauma and are doing their best to piece together what their brain is unlikely to remember clearly,��� said Captain Bill Urban, the spokesman for US Central Command (CENTCOM), the part of the US military overseeing Afghanistan, among other countries. “The testimony of people being shot is not, however, supported by any of the other facts as we know them.”
One of the US investigators, Colonel CJ Douglas, told reporters Friday that US Marines and troops from the United Kingdom did fire after the blast over the canal at two “military-aged males,” but he added that none of the bullets hit their target or any Afghans.
In one incident, Marines “fired four warning shots over the head of an individual who displayed concerning behavior and appeared to be observing the casualty site,” Douglas said. “This individual of interest ultimately fled unharmed,” he added.
That day, US or UK troops were in control of all major compounds around the blast site.
Airport security was run by the US military, although they were joined at the gates in the days ahead of the blast by other allied nations.
The other side of the canal was also largely controlled by UK forces.
The Zohak — which has a helipad — was used by the British and US intermittently, according to two people familiar with the situation.
Nearby Baron Hotel was used by the British to process visa applications.
At about the same time, UK troops fired a small number of warning shots into the air from a tower inside a nearby compound called the Zohak Village in the hopes of preventing a “crowd surge,” according to a UK defense spokesperson. These also hit no one, according to the spokesperson. Another US investigator, Brig. Gen. Lance G. Curtis, said Friday the British fired 25 to 35 rounds over the crowd.
In another incident, a unit of Marines just inside the airport’s outer walls opened fire on a man seen holding an AK-47, CENTCOM spokesman Urban said in a separate statement to CNN. It was not clear how many rounds were fired, but it was likely less than a magazine — 30 rounds — as it did not require a magazine change, he said. “They did not see if the rounds struck the male, but they did not see him again either,” Urban added.
But a senior military official familiar with the investigation denied anyone was hit by gunfire. “Nothing in the investigation — we interviewed all these Marines — led us to conclude that any of that fire struck civilians in any way,” said the official. “All the civilian casualties were attributed to the blast itself.”
“Nothing in the investigation…led us to conclude that any of that fire struck civilians in any way”
senior US military official
“There were warning shots fired by both Brits and others that were misconstrued as a complex attack,” the official said, using a term that refers to an attack with more than one weapon type or attacker. He added that if there were civilian casualties from gunfire, US military ethics would mean personnel on the scene would have reported them.
“I don’t find it credible,” he said. “Not a single Marine in all our interviews was (saying) ‘Listen, I need to talk to you individually. I saw a war crime.’”
Inside the hospitals
Survivors’ claims that they saw people shot are supported by medical documents and interviews with doctors. In 14 cases, medical reports or statements indicate the patient or victim was hit by gunfire.
Three survivors provided medical reports that confirmed bullet wounds, including one from the US military’s Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Maryland. That report was provided by a survivor who was evacuated to the US and spoke on condition of anonymity. The report says the person sustained a gunshot wound to the chest, as well as blast injuries. Morsal Hamidi’s report from the Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center in Kabul says she was shot in the face. Another man provided a report that confirmed a bullet injury in his arm.
Tumblr media
This medical report states that the patient had a gunshot injury to their right arm. Credit: Supplied
Tumblr media
A medical document from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center describing a gunshot wound. Credit: Supplied
CNN also obtained medical documents and a hospital statement confirming that 11 of the dead had been hit by bullets. Ahmad, who lost three relatives in the blast, showed CNN two separate reports from the Daoud Khan Military Hospital stating that his brother and cousin died “due to gunshot injury and blast injuries” from the airport attack.
The Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center also said in a statement they received nine bodies with gunshot wounds in the hour after the explosion. Seven had apparent gunshot injuries to the head, and two had injures to the chest, a spokesperson said, adding the diagnosis was based on the “appearance of the wounds” and not an X-ray or autopsy.
CNN spoke to medical staff at five Kabul hospitals where patients were treated that night who said some had been hit by bullets, suggesting the total hit by gunfire could be much higher. It was not possible for CNN to access the bodies or assess the methodology of the doctors and hospital staff, and autopsies are rare in Afghanistan. While inconclusive, the pattern of testimony from staff across these separate institutions generates further doubt as to whether more than 180 people were killed by one bomb, as the Pentagon insists.
Tumblr media
Wounded women arrive at a hospital for treatment. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
Tumblr media
Volunteers and medical staff help an injured man. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
Tumblr media
A wounded man arrives at a hospital in Kabul after the blast. Credit: Victor J. Blue/The New York Times/Redux
One hospital, Wazir Akbar Khan, received approximately 60 injured people and 145 dead bodies, according to a doctor from the emergency ward who asked not to be named over safety concerns.
The doctor said he had examined the bodies both at night to search for anyone who might be alive among the dead and in the morning to look at the nature of the injuries.
“There was two kinds of injuries,” he said. “People burned from the blast with lots of holes in their bodies. But with the gunshot you can see just one or two holes — in the mouth, in the head, in the eye, in the chest.
“I removed bullets from four or five injured (people),” he said.
Another doctor at the same hospital’s emergency ward said he searched for his own relatives and any survivors among the bodies. He asked not to be identified for his own safety and said he saw many gunshot wounds.
“I can easily recognize gunshot wounds since we have long dealt with them in the hospital,” the doctor said.
Two other hospitals received a total of seven dead bodies with what doctors assessed as bullet wounds, according to medical sources.
“According to my 15 years of surgery in Afghanistan, bomb and bullet injuries are very different”
doctor at Wazir Akbar Khan hospital
CENTCOM spokesman Urban told CNN the medical staff had assessed the injuries incorrectly. US military medical examiners found there was no definitive way to determine objectively and scientifically the cause of death as being from a ball bearing or similar size bullet without a careful study of the internal wounds and finding the projectile that caused it, he said.
“(That was) unlikely to have occurred for a deceased mass casualty victim that arrived (at) a hospital during an ongoing massive trauma event,” Urban said. Investigators asserted there was “a lack of point of injury care, triage, and effective casualty evacuation” for Afghans in Kabul after the blast, he added.
The doctor who removed bullets from patients at Wazir Akbar Khan hospital disagreed and said he was able to determine the different injuries. “According to my 15 years of surgery in Afghanistan, bomb and bullet injuries are very different,” he said. “When a ball bearing enters the body it makes a big hole — different from a sharp bullet. When a bullet enters, it makes a small hole with a specific border and when it leaves it makes a big hole.”
US investigators accepted Friday they had obtained testimony solely from US and coalition personnel. “During the course of our investigation, we did not have an opportunity to speak with Afghans on the ground,” said one of the investigators, Army Brig. Gen. Curtis.
What the video evidence shows
Despite a large number of security cameras around Kabul airport and many Afghans posting videos on social media from the scene, there is limited footage of gunfire in the aftermath of the August 26 blast.
But some video appears to contrast with the US account.
This 33-second video was filmed at 5:40 p.m., about three minutes after the explosion.
It shows survivors of the blast frantically fleeing the scene. Gunshots can be heard.
The video also corroborates some witness testimony, as it shows what appear to be US troops on the airport wall and UK troops on the nearby tower.
The senior military official familiar with the investigation said any rounds were likely fired in the first three minutes after the blast, because no gunfire was apparent on a five-minute video shot by a drone, which started recording three minutes after the blast detonated. “At no point in time throughout this video can you see gunfire,” said the official.
CENTCOM’s Urban added of the drone video: “While this video is not definitive proof that no one was shot during periods of time when the scene was not observed by overhead cameras, they did conclusively demonstrate that the scene of the explosion was not the site of a mass shooting.
“Such an incident would have caused panicked fleeing that continued long after the shooting ended and the likes of which were never observed by any video,” he said.
On Friday, the Pentagon released that drone footage, which the senior military official said was never timestamped. The footage does not provide a stable, constant shot of the bomb’s aftermath, and it does not conclusively support the US assertion that there was no gunfire.
None of the footage obtained by CNN, or the Pentagon, shows US troops firing at civilians. The US official said investigators had not obtained surveillance video of the incident or aftermath.
What the experts say
The senior US military official familiar with the investigation told CNN during a three-and-a-half-hour briefing at the Pentagon in January that everyone who died in the August 26 attack was killed in the blast.
A number of bodies are visible at the start of the US drone footage, though the US official said they had not counted them.
The US official said their experts estimated the size of the bomb to be around 20 pounds (9 kilograms). However, the official noted that their explosives experts had only been able to access the scene 13 hours after the blast. “Their ability to do some forensic collection got really disrupted,” he said. “They did pick up some backpack pieces, things they thought might be part of a vest. None of it came back with any conclusive evidence.” Experts estimated the size of the bomb by comparing it to previous explosions done in tests, he said.
CENTCOM spokesman Urban said in addition to the 13 service members killed, 45 were injured, despite wearing body armor. “The device would have caused catastrophic injuries to the majority of Afghan civilians in the canal,” he said.
Tumblr media
Possible blood stains on the wall of the sewage canal. Credit: CNN
The number of casualties attributed to the blast “and the analysis of our experts demonstrated that such a device could reasonably be expected to have killed all of the 160 to 170 Afghan civilians,” he said.
But experts CNN spoke to were divided as to whether the death toll was unusually high for a 20-pound device.
Pete Norton, an experienced bomb scene investigator and former British Army ammunition technical officer with 30 years’ experience, said it was possible that a 20-pound bomb could have caused over 180 deaths near in the Abbey Gate setting, given the conditions at the time.
Other experts say the damage to the walls around Abbey Gate indicate the bomb may not have been that powerful.
Tumblr media
Possible ball bearings found in a pole near the Abbey Gate entrance. Credit: CNN
Tumblr media
Possible shrapnel marks from the blast. Credit: CNN
Tumblr media
The scene of the blast when CNN visited in November. Credit: CNN
When CNN visited the site in November, the stone walls were marked by what appeared to be pockmarks and blood stains. But there was an absence of significant damage to the walls and infrastructure, suggesting the device may have been smaller than 20 pounds, according to Chris Cobb-Smith, a war crimes investigator and ballistic and blast forensic analyst with 38 years’ military experience. Cobb-Smith, also a former United Nations weapons inspector, was hired by CNN and flown to Kabul to conduct a site survey.
“The number of casualties both dead and wounded is unprecedented for the alleged size of the device utilized in this incident,” he wrote in a statement.
Rachel Lance, an assistant consulting professor at Duke University, who specializes in injury biomechanics and the trauma patterns from blasts, also said the death toll of 180 didn’t align with the size of the bomb. She said the toll was much higher than any other explosion she was aware of from an improvised, person-carried bomb that hadn’t also involved a plane crash or building collapse.
“This death toll is wildly inconsistent compared to all known historical case reports for a bomb that was carried by a single person in an outdoor setting,” said Lance, who based her analysis on images provided by CNN from the scene.
The Pentagon account
The witness accounts, medical reports and expert evidence all raise doubts over the US version of events, which has changed in the months after the blast.
In a press conference on August 27, Maj. Gen. Hank Taylor, deputy director of the joint staff for regional operations, said one suicide bomber was backed by gunmen.
“What we know, there was shooters,” he told reporters. “(We) don’t know the exact number, but one with the suicide vest.”
He did not specify where they were located, only saying that the shooters were in an “enemy position” that was “just north of that gate area.”
In an interview published on September 15, the ground commander of the Abbey Gate unit, US Marine Major Ben Sutphen, told CBS News he had been standing 15 feet (4.5 meters) from the blast and witnessed a fellow American Marine get shot in the shoulder. The soldier managed to retrieve his weapon and “puts the opposing gunman down,” Sutphen said.
Following its investigation, the US military concluded that only UK and US troops fired their weapons near Abbey Gate that day, according to the senior military official. The Taliban did not fire at the scene during the aftermath of the blast, and there were no other gunmen present, the official said.
The Pentagon has since assessed that Sutphen’s statements were in error and based on what he had been told by fellow Marines, rather than what he saw, according to the official.
The US official said this, and “a small number of inconsistencies” in other sworn testimony from US personnel, were common in the aftermath of a devastating blast and did not alter their confidence in the narrative provided to investigators by US personnel.
“In general, the investigation did not believe that anyone who testified about an unsupported event was intentionally lying to investigators and attributed the most likely cause of the inconsistency to the concussive blast effect on the individual’s memory,��� CENTCOM spokesman Urban added.
Families left behind
For relatives of those killed and wounded, the evidence poses questions that need answers.
On August 26, they hoped to flee the repressive Taliban regime.
Now, months later, many are stranded, in a worse situation than before the takeover.
Some families are still grieving loved ones who were killed. Others are separated by continents.
Ahmad went to the airport to help his family members leave the country. Now his family is torn apart. Some of his relatives who reached the area where the US was processing visas before the blast escaped on flights and received treatment in the US for their injuries. But three of his relatives who tried to flee Afghanistan died in the attempt.
Tumblr media
Morsal had been accepted to a French university and was trying to leave Afghanistan. Credit: CNN
Tumblr media
Noorullah says his cousin was hit by a bullet. Credit: CNN
Before the attack, Noorullah wanted to be in the US with his cousin Suhail, working towards a new life. After the blast, he visited Suhail’s grave each day, where he mourned both his cousin and lost dreams. Now he is in Pakistan, where he is being treated for the shrapnel stuck in his head, according to his uncle.
Morsal, who was hit in the jaw, is still recovering from her injuries. She and her family have since managed to escape to France, but the horror of the attack is still with her.
“Every night is like a nightmare for me. I cannot sleep. I just try to remember all my hopes, all my wishes to just live.”
Source link
0 notes
mr-michael-kyle · 3 years
Link
The Taliban has declared August 31, the day after U.S. forces left Afghanistan, “Freedom Day.” Images by AFP via Getty Images (L) and courtesy of Twitter/Zhman TV (R)
August 31 has been declared “Freedom Day” in Afghanistan by members of the Taliban, who celebrated the final departure of the US by parading through the streets with coffins draped in American and NATO flags. Other coffins at the mock funeral, which occurred in the eastern city of Khost on Tuesday, had been cloaked in the flags of France and the UK – all countries which have now totally withdrawn from Afghanistan following a humiliating and ignominious defeat by local militant forces.
The white flag of the Taliban was waved on high by members of the procession.
“August 31 is our formal Freedom Day,” Taliban official Qari Saeed Khosti informed local tv station Zhman TV throughout its coverage of the event. “On this day, American occupying forces and NATO forces fled the country.”
The final U.S. evacuation flights lifted off from Kabul’s Hamid Karzai International airport at 11:59 p.m. local time on Monday, marking the official end of the longest war in American history and the complete surrender of Afghanistan to the Taliban, after almost 20 years of occupation. It additionally marked the end of a chaotic and at times disastrous evacuation mission that flew more than 120,000 U.S. citizens, allies and Afghans out of the country over the course of some 17 days following the fall of Kabul. Tens of thousands have been left behind.
Elsewhere around Afghanistan members of the Taliban celebrated by lofting rifles over their heads and firing into the air. Taliban militants roamed the capital and the airport clad in U.S. fatigues, brandishing American-made rifles and sporting state-of-the-art tactical gear as they inspected helicopters and planes left behind by Western forces. It is understood that the aircraft can’t be flown, having been disabled by Western troops prior to their departure. As one former special forces soldier who fought in Afghanistan told VICE World News: “If anything captured at Kabul ever flies again I’d be really shocked.”
Nonetheless, the footage coming out of Afghanistan following the departure of U.S. forces reaffirms the extreme new reality on the ground: that the country belongs to the Taliban now. And for those left behind in what has recently been renamed the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, the future is uncertain.
Less than a day after the U.S. left, reports suggested that the Taliban have been cementing the composition of their government. Citing Taliban sources, some reports stated the new appointments included Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, the group’s co-founder, as foreign minister; Mullah Yaqub Akhund, the son of the group’s former leader Mullah Mohammad Omar, as defense minister; and Sirajuddin Haqqani, leader of the notorious Haqqani Network and one of the world’s most wanted terrorists, as interior minister. VICE World News haven’t been capable of verifying the positions independently.
Other members of the Haqqani Network have been previously spotted roaming freely through the streets of Kabul, stoking fears that the Taliban can be no less brutal in their governance of the country than when they had been last in power, between 1996 and 2001. During that time, the Taliban ruled a reign of terror with rife human rights abuses, as a result of their strict interpretation of Sharia law.
Additionally on Tuesday, al Qaeda released a statement on the Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan, congratulating the leaders of the Islamic emirate and the Islamic community at large for what they described as “a symbol of resilience and resistance against invading imperialist powers.”
“We praise the Almighty, the Omnipotent, who humiliated and defeated America, the head of disbelief,” reads the impassioned statement. “We praise Him for breaking America’s back, tarnishing its global reputation and expelling it, disgraced and humiliated, from the Islamic land of Afghanistan.”
“Afghanistan is undoubtedly a graveyard of empires and an impregnable fortress of Islam,” it continues. “Regardless of how well-equipped, numerically superior, hegemonic and brutal the enemy could be, it shall never have the ability to stand the test of time in the face of a nation that strongly holds onto the Book of Allah.”
Al Qaeda concluded by calling on the nation of Afghanistan to unite around the new leadership, and to “abide by the decisions and Shariah-based policies of the blessed Islamic Emirate.” The extremist group also advised that America’s defeat in Afghanistan set a precedent for Islamic groups all over the world, including in Europe and East Asia, to rise up in opposition to the West.
Speaking from the White House on August 31, President Joe Biden defended his decision. He also stated that “for those who remain, we will make arrangements to get them out if they so choose.”
“We’ll continue to work to assist more people leave the country who’re at risk. We’re far from done,” Biden stated, noting that “the Taliban has made public commitments, broadcast on tv and radio throughout Afghanistan on safe passage for anybody wanting to leave, including those that worked alongside Americans.”
The Taliban has reportedly agreed to permit foreign nationals and Afghans with relevant travel paperwork to depart the country safely after the international rescue mission ends. Whether or not they are going to honor their word remains to be seen – however Biden stated the U.S. “have leverage” to ensure these commitments are met.
“We’ll continue to support the Afghan folks through diplomacy, international influence and humanitarian aid,” he added. “We’ll continue to push for regional diplomacy engagement to prevent violence and instability. We’ll continue to speak out for the basic rights of Afghan folks, especially women and girls … Human rights will be the centre of our foreign policy. However the way to do this isn’t through endless military deployments, but through diplomacy, economic tools and rallying the rest of the world for support.”
“The war in Afghanistan is now over,” Biden declared. “[It] should have ended long ago.”
0 notes
xtruss · 3 years
Text
Tumblr media
A woman filmed a video screen showing President Xi Jinping commemorating the 100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing on Thursday. Andy Wong/Associated Press
Xi Jinping Warns China Won’t Be Bullied as Communist Party Marks 100 Years
Celebrations help leader showcase achievements as he confronts a sluggish domestic economy and frosty ties with the U.S. and other Western powers. In fiery speech, president appeared to hit back at critics of the country's policies, human rights record
— By Chun Han Wong and Keith Zhai | July 1, 2021 | The Wall Street Journal
With a martial message of triumph, Chinese leader Xi Jinping marked his ruling Communist Party’s 100th birthday with calls to rouse patriotic passions, repel foreign coercion and entrench one-party rule, signaling defiance against U.S.-led efforts to pressure Beijing.
Addressing more than 70,000 people gathered Thursday at Beijing’s Tiananmen Square, Mr. Xi struck strident tones in recounting the party’s successes in surmounting challenges at home and abroad—from eliminating rural poverty to resisting imperialist aggression. He insisted that China has irreversibly emerged from past humiliation by foreign powers into an era of pride and prosperity.
The Chinese people “will never allow any foreign force to bully, oppress, or enslave us,” Mr. Xi said, dressed in a gray Mao suit atop the Gate of Heavenly Peace. “Anyone who tries to do so shall be battered and bloodied from colliding with a great wall of steel forged by more than 1.4 billion Chinese people using flesh and blood,” he said, drawing cheers and applause.
Tumblr media
Chinese President Xi Jinping, centre, waves next to former president Hu Jintao, right, during a ceremony to mark the 100th anniversary of the founding of the ruling Chinese Communist Party at Tiananmen Gate in Beijing on Thursday. (Ng Han Guan/The Associated Press)
The centennial celebrations help Mr. Xi showcase his achievements as he confronts a sluggish domestic economy, frosty ties with the U.S. and other Western powers, and China’s souring international image. Officials have also used the grandiose festivities to underscore Mr. Xi’s clout as he prepares for a twice-a-decade party congress next year where he is expected to claim a third term as party chief and pick new lieutenants.
State media have echoed Mr. Xi’s messaging while saturating airwaves and newsprint with pro-party publicity. In a Thursday editorial, the party’s official mouthpiece, People’s Daily, called on the party’s 95 million members and the Chinese people to unite more closely around Mr. Xi’s leadership in striving to make China a rich, advanced and truly global power by 2049, the 100th anniversary of Communist rule.
In his speech, Mr. Xi offered little in the way of new policies and mainly restated his priorities, such as fighting corruption, strengthening the military and seeking unification with the democratically self-ruled island of Taiwan. He also offered assurances that China wants to be a peaceful and positive contributor to the global order, countering criticism of what Western governments have called Beijing’s abrasive diplomacy.
While Mr. Xi made no mention of U.S. efforts to assemble an international coalition against China’s industrial policies and suppression of civil liberties in Hong Kong and Xinjiang, he underlined Beijing’s defiance by invoking patriotic language from past speeches. He insisted that China alone would decide its path and brook no foreign meddling in its affairs.
The Communist Party and the Chinese people “welcome all helpful suggestions and constructive criticism,” Mr. Xi said. “But we won’t accept sanctimonious lectures from self-styled preachers.”
In the months before July 1, the party’s designated anniversary date, Mr. Xi directed a nationwide campaign to promote the party’s past glories. Patriotic slogans and floral arrangements have sprung up around Beijing and other cities, and authorities are releasing new movies and television series that dramatize the party’s revolutionary history.
The celebrations culminated in Thursday’s ceremony, where honor guards, military musicians, youthful choristers and thousands of flag-waving guests provided pomp and circumstance for the occasion.
The proceedings, which stretched close to two hours, kicked off with choral renditions of patriotic songs such as “Without the Communist Party, There Would be No New China” and featured a flyover by military helicopters and jets, including China’s J-20 stealth fighter. A phalanx of 56 artillery guns, a nod to China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups, fired a 100-shot salute to the party.
Former leader Hu Jintao and other retired party elders attended the ceremony, though 94-year-old Jiang Zemin, who was the party’s general secretary from 1989 to 2002, was absent. Mr. Jiang’s health has long been the subject of speculation in China.
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Left: Members of a band representing the People’s Liberation Army played at the CCP’s 100th anniversary ceremony in Beijing on Thursday. Photo: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images. Right: A crowd listening to Xi Jinping speak in Beijing on Thursday. Photo: Kevin Frayer/Getty Images.
The festivities spilled onto Chinese social media, where only one of the top 50 trending topics on the Twitter-like Weibo platform on Thursday morning wasn’t related to the party centenary. On the video-streaming site Douyin, a video showing a girl who used red chile peppers to form a party flag drew nearly seven million views.
Leading Chinese entrepreneurs also took the opportunity to showcase their loyalty to the party amid government efforts to rein in some of the countries’ largest tech companies. Wang Xing, the chief executive of delivery giant Meituan, who sparked a social-media furor in May by posting an ancient poem that some readers interpreted as criticism of Mr. Xi, appeared in state-media footage showing the crowd on Tiananmen Square. China launched an antitrust investigation into Meituan in April.
Tumblr media
Attendees wave Chinese flags during the ceremony at Tiananmen Square. (Ng Han Guan/The Associated Press)
On Thursday, meanwhile, Hong Kong marked the anniversary of its handover to China from the U.K. in a starkly different way from years past. A year after Beijing imposed a national security law on the city to stifle dissent, the boisterous and large pro-democracy march that took place annually on July 1 was replaced by a heavy police presence and proud displays of the Chinese flag.
Police officers put Hong Kong’s Victoria Park, where large crowds of protesters traditionally gather—as well as its surrounding areas—on lockdown. Tension in the streets rose as officers searched and detained pedestrians, at times laying out their belongings on the ground. Some who made pro-protest hand gestures or held up signs were also led away by the police.
Late Thursday, in the heavily patrolled Causeway Bay district, a man stabbed a police officer before reportedly stabbing himself to death. Police said in a statement on Facebook that the man attacked an officer with a knife, seriously injuring his back. The man then stabbed himself in the chest, according to local media outlets. A local hospital spokesman confirmed late Thursday that the man had died. It wasn’t immediately clear if the incident was related to the political anniversary.
— Elaine Yu in Hong Kong contributed to this article.
0 notes
novumtimes · 3 months
Text
Missing mother found dead inside 16-foot-long python after it swallowed her whole in Indonesia
A woman has been found dead inside the belly of a snake after it swallowed her whole in central Indonesia, a local official said Saturday, marking at least the fifth person to be devoured by a python in the country since 2017. The husband of 45-year-old Farida and residents of Kalempang village in South Sulawesi province discovered her on Friday inside the reticulated python, which measured around five meters (16 feet). The mother-of-four had gone missing Thursday night and failed to return home, forcing a search effort, village head Suardi Rosi told AFP. Her husband “found her belongings… which made him suspicious. The villagers then searched the area. They soon spotted a python with a large belly,” said Suardi. “They agreed to cut open the python’s stomach. As soon as they did, Farida’s head was immediately visible.” Farida was found fully clothed inside the snake. Graphic video published by TMZ appeared to show the snake being cut open in a wooded area while more footage posted by the Daily Mail appeared showed the woman’s body being carried in a blanket past distressed villagers. Other similar incidents in recent years Reticulated pythons grab onto their prey with dozens of sharp curved teeth and then squeeze it to death before swallowing it whole. They are widespread in Indonesia and other parts of Southeast Asia, and are known to eat monkeys, pigs and other mammals. A reticulated python (Malayopython reticulatus) wriggles over a tree trunk at Hagenbeck Zoo in December 2021. Axel Heimken/picture alliance via Getty Images Reports of humans being killed by pythons are extremely rare but several people have died in Indonesia in recent years after being swallowed whole by pythons. Last year, residents in Southeast Sulawesi’s Tinanggea district killed an eight-meter python, which was found strangling and eating one of the farmers in a village. In 2022, a woman in Indonesia’s Jambi province was killed and swallowed whole by a python, the BBC reported, citing local media. In 2018, a woman was found dead inside a seven-meter python in Southeast Sulawesi’s Muna town. Officials said the victim, 54-year-old Wa Tiba, went missing while checking her vegetable garden near her village.    In 2017, a farmer in West Sulawesi went missing before being found eaten alive by a four-meter python at a palm oil plantation. A six-minute video obtained by CBS News showed villagers slicing open the python’s carcass to reveal the legs and torso of the dead victim, named Akbar. Villagers said the victim was likely ambushed from behind. “Reputation for being aggressive” The reticulated python is the longest snake in the world, according to London’s Natural History Museum. They are native to Southern Asia and can grow to be more than 20 feet long. The longest reticulated python ever found in the wild was discovered in 1912, according to the museum, and was measured to be nearly 33 feet long – “more than half the length of a bowling lane and makes this snake longer than a giraffe is tall.”  Zoo Atlanta, which houses reticulated pythons, says the snakes “have a reputation for being aggressive.” The snakes are occasionally kept as pets in the U.S. Last year, a 14-foot-long reticulated python was found dead on side of the road on Long Island, prompting a search for its owner. In 2022, a 16-foot albino reticulated python that slithered through a Texas neighborhood for months was finally rescued and returned to its owner. More from CBS News Source link via The Novum Times
0 notes
dailynewswebsite · 4 years
Text
Repatriating the archives: Lumbee scholars find their people and bring them home
Jeanette W. Jones holds the September 1957 situation of Ebony journal, which options the article 'Thriller Folks of Baltimore: Neither crimson, nor black, nor white. Unusual ‘Indian’ tribe lives in world of its personal.' She is pictured at heart, together with her hand on her hip. Photograph Sean Scheidt; writer supplied, Writer supplied
Following World Warfare II, hundreds of Lumbee Indians migrated from their tribal homeland in rural North Carolina to industrialized cities, together with Baltimore and Philadelphia.
In search of work and a greater high quality of life, they shaped distinct Lumbee communities. They introduced their meals – cornbread, collards, pastry. They introduced their singing and powerful work ethic. They turned enterprise house owners. They based church buildings and concrete Indian Facilities.
Their lives and contributions turned a part of the historic document and cultural landscapes of those locations, however over time, a posh set of things have resulted within the motion and displacement of the individuals themselves.
We’re Lumbee students Ashley Minner from Baltimore and Jessica Locklear from Philadelphia. We now have mined native archives looking for our forebears. We’ve discovered information articles, images, maps and even video footage documenting kinfolk and buddies who usually don’t know they’re represented in collections.
As safeguarders of historical past, institutional archives essentially have guidelines in place to control entry to their collections. Most of the supplies are additionally topic to copyright, and the rights are owned by the creators of the supplies or their employers. In different phrases, a photographer or the corporate the photographer was working for would personal the rights to a particular {photograph}.
Confronted with restrictions as to how the recollections we discovered will be accessed and shared, we ask: Who has the best to the archives? What are our obligations each as tribal residents and public-facing researchers after we discover “our individuals” in them?
Ashley Minner, Baltimore
When Lumbee Indians moved to Baltimore, they settled in an space on the east aspect of city bridging the neighborhoods of Washington Hill and Higher Fells Level. The blocks of brick row homes with marble steps appeared nothing like the agricultural house they left behind, however as different ethnic communities had carried out earlier than them, they made this place their very own.
In 2018, I hit the archives in earnest, anxious to corroborate tales shared by my elders about “the reservation” they’d shaped there of their youth.
They described a panorama intimately acquainted to me, the place locations I grew up – the Baltimore American Indian Heart and South Broadway Baptist Church – are nonetheless open and working. However their tales had been stuffed with names of companies and other people I didn’t know as a result of this space has been regularly reworked since then.
Tumblr media
View of South Broadway from the Baltimore American Indian Heart. Photograph by Colby Ware for OSI Baltimore, 2014
One of many first and richest sources of documentation I discovered was the Baltimore Information American newspaper photograph archive. There have been forgotten photos of neighborhood leaders, legends and even kinfolk.
My instant impulse was to share the images by way of social media so our individuals might get pleasure from them as effectively. To share them legally, I wanted permission from the Hearst Company, which owns the copyright, which I finally acquired, months later.
Within the meantime, I bumped into Hannah Locklear, one other Lumbee lady from Baltimore. She cried glad tears once I confirmed her one of many archival photos I had saved on my telephone. There was her great-grandma, Margie Chavis, younger, standing on the stoop of the Baltimore American Indian Heart. Together with our recollections, photos from archives like these are typically all that stay.
A fellow researcher alerted me to a September 1957 Ebony journal article – “Thriller Folks of Baltimore: Neither crimson, nor black, nor white. Unusual ‘Indian’ tribe lives in world of its personal.”
A grainy print copy is on the market at Baltimore’s Enoch Pratt Free Library. I observed immediately that one of many featured images – taken at a youth social dance and captioned “Typical Indian lady” – was my Aunt Jeanette. Simply 14 years outdated, she was neither interviewed nor informed how her photograph can be used.
With nice celebration, the Ebony and Jet Journal photograph archives had been lately donated to the Nationwide Museum of African American Historical past and Tradition and the Getty Analysis Institute so they might be “broadly accessible to researchers, students and the general public.” However these archives aren’t publicly out there but.
Extremely, a duplicate of the journal itself was listed within the collections of a London prop store. I purchased it and introduced it house to Aunt Jeanette.
She rigorously opened the yellowed, outsized journal and delightedly discovered a teenage model of herself inside, together with images of different Lumbee younger individuals, new on the Baltimore scene, enjoying at youth facilities, sitting on stoops, lounging in Patterson Park.
Tumblr media
‘Thriller Folks of Baltimore’ unfold, Ebony, 1957. Photograph by Sean Scheidt
Regardless of the hurtful context of the article, Ebony managed to seize a particular time for our neighborhood. These are among the solely photos we’ve of “the reservation” in its heyday.
Sadly, they’re out there solely to those that can wait an indeterminate time frame till they’re made publicly out there, after which navigate the paperwork of the establishment the place they’re housed.
Jessica Locklear, Philadelphia
In contrast to Baltimore, there was no “reservation” in Philadelphia. Right here, Lumbees settled in pockets throughout the town, but discovered methods to forge a way of neighborhood. Once I began my analysis, I doubted there can be proof of Philadelphia’s Lumbee neighborhood in any archives. I used to be mistaken.
Whereas looking the archives of the Philadelphia Inquirer newspaper, I discovered a narrative a couple of Lumbee man named Thessely Campbell who was set to star in a 1984 PBS documentary. Campbell moved from Fairmont, North Carolina, to Philadelphia in 1952 and located employment as a welder on the Budd Firm.
Acquiring a duplicate of this documentary was a prolonged course of. The closest out there copy was at a college library over 320 miles away. “The Work I’ve Achieved” focuses on Campbell’s retirement, but in addition paperwork Philadelphia’s Lumbee neighborhood, together with footage shot contained in the Native American Freewill Baptist Church, the place Campbell was a minister.
Tumblr media
Screenshot exhibiting the Native American Freewill Baptist Church, the place Campbell was a minister. ‘The Work I’ve Achieved.’ Blue Ridge Mountain Movies, Directed by Kenneth Fink, 1984.
In 2019, I carried out an oral historical past interview with Campbell’s spouse, Helen. She wished a DVD copy of the movie to maintain and share with household. It was at this second I requested: What’s my obligation to go alongside materials that’s out there to me, as a scholar, to those that could not have the ability to entry it in any other case?
I felt strongly a duplicate of this movie belonged within the arms of the household represented in it. Asserting a declare of truthful use, I made Ms. Helen a duplicate, and I’m glad I did – she handed away just a few months later.
Extra lately, I stumbled upon a digital copy of the documentary made out there by the Web Archive, a nonprofit devoted to common entry of archival supplies. Nonetheless, “accessible” doesn’t at all times imply findable.
In sifting by means of numerous archival data, I often discover images of acquainted faces, which I attempt to share with these people or households. Most individuals are tickled to seek out they’re within the archives, and most get pleasure from having the ability to view and share photos they might not have discovered themselves.
Tumblr media
Rev. Thessely Campbell and Helen Campbell. Photograph courtesy of Maria Luisa Rios.
Accountability in two instructions
The famend Lumbee scholar Malinda Maynor Lowery writes of being “certain by two units of ethics that overlap closely: A Lumbee’s obligation calls for accountability to the individuals who have lived historical past, and a historian’s accountability calls for accountability to the widest doable sources.”
As tribal residents and students doing public-facing work, we contemplate ourselves equally certain. We seek for “our individuals” far and huge. Once we discover them in archives, we really feel obligated to deliver them house to their households.
Understanding our individuals is not going to entry archives as we do, by means of libraries, universities and museum collections, we meet them the place they’re – of their houses, out on the earth, and on social media.
[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversation’s newsletter.]
Repatriating the archives isn’t at all times about eradicating supplies from institutional care. It’s ensuring the individuals whose lives and cultures are represented in collections know they’re there, and guaranteeing they’ve the flexibility to view and share these supplies as they see match. When supplies are returned to their communities of origin, they turn out to be reactivated.
If we’ve the flexibility to present a lady – or an entire neighborhood – the chance to disarm a hurtful encounter of their youth, and to permit public affirmation of their magnificence and true historical past, we are going to. If we will return a strolling, speaking, preaching, singing father, husband and minister to his individuals, we are going to.
We’re devoted to sharing the wealthy histories of former Lumbee neighborhoods with current generations. Bringing archival supplies on to our individuals presents alternatives to work together with our shared previous – and that informs our future.
Tumblr media
Ashley Minner has acquired funding for her analysis from the College of Maryland School Park, the Dresher Heart for the Humanities at UMBC, the American Folklore Society, and Alternate ROOTS. Ashley is an enrolled member of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina.
Jessica Locklear works as a Area Scholar for the Southern Oral Historical past Program (SOHP). Jessica is a latest graduate from Temple College's Heart for Public Historical past. She acquired funding for her analysis from the Leeway Basis and Oral Historical past within the Mid-Atlantic Area (OHMAR). Jessica is an enrolled member of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina.
from Growth News https://growthnews.in/repatriating-the-archives-lumbee-scholars-find-their-people-and-bring-them-home/ via https://growthnews.in
1 note · View note
mhsn033 · 4 years
Text
US Supreme Court rules half of Oklahoma is Native American land
Image copyright Getty Footage
Image caption The 5 Tribes of Oklahoma – Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw and Seminole and Muscogee Nation – proudly uphold their traditions
The US Supreme Court docket has dominated about half of Oklahoma belongs to Native Americans, in a landmark case that also quashed a baby rape conviction.
The justices determined 5-4 that an eastern chunk of the affirm, along side its 2nd-largest metropolis, Tulsa, could nonetheless be recognised as fragment of a reservation.
Jimcy McGirt, who became once convicted in 1997 of raping a woman, introduced the case.
He cited the historical claim of the Muscogee (Creek) Nation to the land where the assault came about.
What does the ruling mean?
Thursday’s resolution in McGirt v Oklahoma is considered as with out a doubt one of many most far-reaching conditions for Native Americans sooner than the very ideal US court docket in decades.
The ruling plan some tribe individuals chanced on guilty in affirm courts for offences dedicated on the land at suppose can now danger their convictions.
Tumblr media
Media playback is unsupported to your instrument
Media captionA characterize album that took 25 years to assemble
Handiest federal prosecutors will keep in mind the skill to criminally prosecute Native Americans accused of crimes in the dwelling.
Tribe individuals who dwell within the boundaries could additionally be exempt from affirm taxes, in step with Reuters news agency.
Some 1.8 million other folks – of whom about 15% are Native American – dwell on the land, which spans three million acres.
What did the justices train?
Justice Neil Gorsuch, a conservative appointed by US President Donald Trump, sided with the court docket’s four liberals and likewise wrote the belief.
He referred to the Path of Tears, the forcible 19th Century relocation of Native Americans, along side the Creek Nation, to Oklahoma.
The US government mentioned on the time that the new land would belong to the tribes in perpetuity.
Justice Gorsuch wrote: “This present day we are requested whether or not the land these treaties promised remains an Indian reservation for applications of federal criminal guidelines.
“Because Congress has not mentioned in every other case, we preserve the federal government to its discover.”
What about the rape case?
The ruling overturned McGirt’s penal advanced sentence. He could nonetheless, nonetheless, be tried in federal court docket.
McGirt, now 71, became once convicted in 1997 in Wagoner County of raping a four-year-gentle lady.
Tumblr media
Media playback is unsupported to your instrument
Media captionWhat took region to Olivia Lone Ranking?
He did not dispute his guilt sooner than the Supreme Court docket, nonetheless argued that finest federal authorities could nonetheless were entitled to prosecute him.
McGirt is a member of the Seminole Nation.
His attorney, Ian Heath Gershengorn, instructed CNBC: “The Supreme Court docket reaffirmed this day that after the US makes guarantees, the courts will withhold those guarantees.”
How could Oklahoma’s criminal justice machine be affected?
In a dissenting belief, Chief Justice John Roberts mentioned the resolution would destabilise the affirm’s courts.
He wrote: “The Whisper’s skill to prosecute serious crimes shall be hobbled and decades of past convictions could effectively be thrown out.
“The resolution this day creates major uncertainty for the Whisper’s continuing authority over any home that touches Indian affairs, ranging from zoning and taxation to family and environmental guidelines.”
An diagnosis by The Atlantic magazine of Oklahoma Division of Corrections files chanced on that 1,887 Native Americans had been in penal advanced as of the stop of closing year for offences dedicated within the boundaries of the tribal territory.
Nonetheless fewer than one in 10 of those conditions would qualify for a brand new federal trial, in step with the evaluation.
Tumblr media
Media playback is unsupported to your instrument
Media captionCan indigenous wellness lend a hand heal historical trauma?
Jonodev Chaudhuri, a gentle chief justice of the Muscogee Nation’s Supreme Court docket, dismissed talk of lawful mayhem.
He instructed the Tulsa World newspaper: “The whole sky-is-falling narratives had been dubious at easiest.
“This could finest apply to a cramped subset of Native Americans committing crimes within the boundaries.”
How did loads of tribal leaders react?
In a joint assertion, the 5 Tribes of Oklahoma – Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw and Seminole and Muscogee Nation – welcomed the ruling.
They pledged to work with federal and affirm authorities to agree shared jurisdiction over the land.
“The International locations and the affirm are dedicated to enforcing a framework of shared jurisdiction that will preserve sovereign interests and rights to self-government whereas placing forward jurisdictional understandings, procedures, guidelines and guidelines that enhance public safety, our economy and private property rights,” the assertion mentioned.
from WordPress https://ift.tt/3iXBIoa via IFTTT
0 notes
classyfoxdestiny · 3 years
Text
Inside the Kabul airport massacre #ٹاپسٹوریز
New Post has been published on https://mediaboxup.com/inside-the-kabul-airport-massacre-2/
Inside the Kabul airport massacre
Tumblr media
| Special report
Inside the final deadly moments of the US’ longest-running war
By Nick Paton Walsh, Sandi Sidhu, Julia Hollingsworth, Masoud Popalzai, Sitara Zamani, Abdul Basir Bina, Katie Polglase and Gianluca Mezzofiore
February 8, 2022
On August 26, 2021, a blast ripped through a crowd outside Kabul airport. More than 180 people were confirmed dead, including 13 American troops.
The Pentagon says all were killed by an ISIS-K bomb.
A CNN investigation raises questions over whether some may have been shot.
Thursday, August 26, 2021 17:36:52 p.m.
The blast ripped through the desperate mass of people outside Kabul airport, turning the sewage canal they’d been standing in red with body parts and blood.
Shogofa Hamidi opened her eyes to find the air thick with smoke, she said. Bodies had fallen on top of each other, and human flesh had splattered onto her face and into her mouth. The travel documents she had been holding had turned to ash.
Around her, people were screaming and wailing. Within minutes, according to Shogofa, the shooting started.
What happened next is part of the untold — and still disputed — story of the attack on Abbey Gate.
Tumblr media
Clothes and blood stains in the sewage canal following the blast. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
Tumblr media
Backpacks and belongings of Afghans who were waiting to be evacuated. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
The Pentagon said Friday all 170 Afghans and 13 United States service members who died that day were killed in the blast. A three-and-a-half-month US military investigation involving interviews with 139 people concluded that while US Marines opened fire twice after the blast, none of the bullets hit anyone, according to a detailed media briefing by the investigating team on February 4.
The British military say their troops fired into the air to clear a pressing crowd, but nobody was hit. ISIS-K claimed responsibility for the bombing, which caused the highest US death toll from a single incident in Afghanistan in more than a decade.
But a four-month CNN investigation raises hard questions over what really happened that day — and how so many people died.
CNN spoke to more than 70 witnesses and families of the dead, reviewed medical records and analyzed video, photos and audio of the scene. Medical staff and administrators at five hospitals that received victims from the attack noted the presence of bullet wounds, and one doctor described removing bullets himself. Hospital statements and patients’ medical records reference bullet wounds. Survivors and families of some of the dead insisted some of the dead and wounded were shot.
Two forensic blast analysts said it was unlikely that so many people could have died in a single person-borne explosion, though other experts told CNN it was possible.
But there are limits to what can be learned. Autopsies are not common in Afghanistan, leaving the medical assessments inconclusive. Video from social media and the military is spotty, and there are gaps in the timeline of events where no footage seems to exist. There are limits to the US military investigation as well. Investigators did not speak to any staff at Afghanistan hospitals or medical staff outside of the US military. Nor did they interview any Afghan civilians.
Still, the information obtained by CNN raises the possibility that gunfire could have played a role in injuries and deaths on that terrible day, despite American and British military denials. This reporting prompts questions about whether the full story has been told about military conduct in the aftermath of the blast.
How it happened
In the days leading up to the blast, Afghans thronged around the perimeter of Kabul airport, clamoring for a flight out of the city.
The Taliban had taken the capital on August 15, plunging the country back into the hands of a repressive regime the US and its allies had fought for almost 20 years to repel.
By August 26, the desperation outside the airport’s walls was at its peak.
Tumblr media
A US Marine at Hamid Karzai International Airport on August 26, 2021. Credit: Staff Sgt. Victor Mancilla/US Marine Corps/Reuters
Tumblr media
People gather near an evacuation control checkpoint on the perimeter of Kabul airport on August 26, 2021. Credit: Wali Sabawoon/AP
Tumblr media
Afghans attempting to flee the country try to reach foreign forces outside Kabul airport on August 26, 2021. Credit: Akhter Gulfam/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
The US soldiers were just five days away from their deadline to leave and the risks were increasing of an ISIS-K attack. The US Embassy in Kabul warned people to stay away from the airport, unless specifically invited by a US representative.
But the crowds came anyway. Some Afghans arrived at the airport clutching visas or passports for other countries. Others held only hope that they would somehow be ushered through the airport gates.
After the capital fell, thousands of Afghans gathered daily at Hamid Karzai International Airport.
It was the main US evacuation route out of the country and the last place in the capital still under US control.
But getting into the airport — and out of the country — wasn’t easy.
Afghans needed to get through one of the airport gates — and for many, that meant going through Abbey Gate.
Some evacuees stood in a sewage canal that runs along the perimeter of the airport, waving their documents.
Then evacuees needed to get past the allied forces manning the entrance.
This satellite photo shows crowds gathering at the Abbey Gate checkpoint on August 25 — the day before the blast.
The following day, a suspected suicide bomber would detonate an explosive near Abbey Gate.
In the hours before the August 26 blast, video shows people massing near the razor-wire fence guarded by allied troops that separated them from the airport.
Watch what it was like on the ground
Shogofa and her sister Morsal were among the crowd of people standing in the filthy sewage stream, hoping to show their travel documents to French soldiers. Morsal, then 17, had been accepted to a French university and her sister and parents had been told they could evacuate with her.
Nearby, Ahmad, who does not wish to use his real name for safety reasons, was standing with more than a dozen of his family members, including women and children. Some clutched bags stuffed with clothes and belongings for the journey.
Unlike thousands of others, they had valid travel documents: One was a US citizen, some had green cards, and another obtained a visa after working for the Americans.
Shortly before the blast, most of Ahmad’s family had crossed the sewage canal to the area near where US troops were checking documents. The men were passing up the last of their luggage behind them.
Then the bomb detonated…
“The sky turned red with dust.”
“The canal was filled with blood.”
“There was a mountain of dead bodies.”
“(I saw) pieces of human limbs and clothes flying in the air.”
Some Afghans were killed instantaneously. Others were thrown to the ground. On the airport side of the canal, foreign troops lay dead or injured, according to witnesses. Others were still blocking the gate to the airport as dazed Afghans struggled to their feet.
As Shogofa lay in a pile of bodies, she said she saw soldiers in American uniforms rush to pull their injured comrades to safety. Then Shogofa says she saw troops firing on injured Afghans.
“I saw people who were injured in the explosion trying to get up, but they fired on them,” she said.
Shogofa felt someone pulling on her head. It was her sister Morsal, who was bleeding and moving her mouth as if to call her sister’s name, but was unable to speak.
“There was so much blood coming out of her face, like a faucet running full of blood,” Shogofa said.
“There was no shooting in the air. They were targeting people. It was intentional”
Nazir, an eyewitness
Morsal had been hit by shrapnel in the shoulder in the blast but was still able to stand. Shortly after the blast, she said she also saw soldiers firing on those who were standing. Then a bullet struck her jaw and came out the right side of her neck, she said. A medical report from the Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center in Kabul, seen by CNN, confirmed she had been hit by a bullet.
Nineteen witnesses said they either saw people being hit by gunfire or were hit by gunfire themselves. While CNN has not been able to verify each witness account of seeing gunfire, it adds to the pressing questions the US military faces over the incident.
When he came to after the explosion, Ahmad leapt into the canal, where he found his cousin, Mohammad, injured but conscious. He pulled him to the side of the putrid water. As Ahmad tried to help his other relatives, he saw a bullet strike Mohammad’s forehead, killing him instantly.
Tumblr media
This medical report from the Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center in Kabul diagnoses Morsal with a “B.I.” — or bullet injury — to the left side of her face. Credit: Supplied
Tumblr media
This death certificate notes that Mohammad died from “shot injury and blast injuries.” Credit: Supplied
Nazir, 16, who was at the airport with his brother, his brother’s wife and their children, said the shooting seemed to start straight after the explosion.
“There was no shooting in the air. They were targeting people. It was intentional,” he said. “In front of me, people were getting shot at and falling down.”
Another survivor, Noorullah Zakhel, was also standing in the canal when the blast went off. He said he turned to his cousin, Suhail, who appeared uninjured by the blast. “Run,” he said.
Noorullah said he heard shooting as he clambered up the canal wall, so he dropped to the ground and hid among dead bodies. Noorullah noted that the bullets seemed to hit those who tried to flee, so he turned to a family lying next to him and said: “Please don’t run, they will shoot you.”
He recalled soldiers standing in front of him. “They said nothing — they just shooted people.” The next day, Noorullah’s family told him that Suhail had died after being hit by what appeared to be a bullet.
Who fired shots
The US military confirmed only American and British troops were in the area at the time — but they say witnesses who claim to have seen people being shot were mistaken.
“The testimony you describe is not inconsistent with the recollections of people with jumbled memories from a concussive event who witnessed trauma and are doing their best to piece together what their brain is unlikely to remember clearly,” said Captain Bill Urban, the spokesman for US Central Command (CENTCOM), the part of the US military overseeing Afghanistan, among other countries. “The testimony of people being shot is not, however, supported by any of the other facts as we know them.”
One of the US investigators, Colonel CJ Douglas, told reporters Friday that US Marines and troops from the United Kingdom did fire after the blast over the canal at two “military-aged males,” but he added that none of the bullets hit their target or any Afghans.
In one incident, Marines “fired four warning shots over the head of an individual who displayed concerning behavior and appeared to be observing the casualty site,” Douglas said. “This individual of interest ultimately fled unharmed,” he added.
That day, US or UK troops were in control of all major compounds around the blast site.
Airport security was run by the US military, although they were joined at the gates in the days ahead of the blast by other allied nations.
The other side of the canal was also largely controlled by UK forces.
The Zohak — which has a helipad — was used by the British and US intermittently, according to two people familiar with the situation.
Nearby Baron Hotel was used by the British to process visa applications.
At about the same time, UK troops fired a small number of warning shots into the air from a tower inside a nearby compound called the Zohak Village in the hopes of preventing a “crowd surge,” according to a UK defense spokesperson. These also hit no one, according to the spokesperson. Another US investigator, Brig. Gen. Lance G. Curtis, said Friday the British fired 25 to 35 rounds over the crowd.
In another incident, a unit of Marines just inside the airport’s outer walls opened fire on a man seen holding an AK-47, CENTCOM spokesman Urban said in a separate statement to CNN. It was not clear how many rounds were fired, but it was likely less than a magazine — 30 rounds — as it did not require a magazine change, he said. “They did not see if the rounds struck the male, but they did not see him again either,” Urban added.
But a senior military official familiar with the investigation denied anyone was hit by gunfire. “Nothing in the investigation — we interviewed all these Marines — led us to conclude that any of that fire struck civilians in any way,” said the official. “All the civilian casualties were attributed to the blast itself.”
“Nothing in the investigation…led us to conclude that any of that fire struck civilians in any way”
senior US military official
“There were warning shots fired by both Brits and others that were misconstrued as a complex attack,” the official said, using a term that refers to an attack with more than one weapon type or attacker. He added that if there were civilian casualties from gunfire, US military ethics would mean personnel on the scene would have reported them.
“I don’t find it credible,” he said. “Not a single Marine in all our interviews was (saying) ‘Listen, I need to talk to you individually. I saw a war crime.’”
Inside the hospitals
Survivors’ claims that they saw people shot are supported by medical documents and interviews with doctors. In 14 cases, medical reports or statements indicate the patient or victim was hit by gunfire.
Three survivors provided medical reports that confirmed bullet wounds, including one from the US military’s Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Maryland. That report was provided by a survivor who was evacuated to the US and spoke on condition of anonymity. The report says the person sustained a gunshot wound to the chest, as well as blast injuries. Morsal Hamidi’s report from the Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center in Kabul says she was shot in the face. Another man provided a report that confirmed a bullet injury in his arm.
Tumblr media
This medical report states that the patient had a gunshot injury to their right arm. Credit: Supplied
Tumblr media
A medical document from Walter Reed National Military Medical Center describing a gunshot wound. Credit: Supplied
CNN also obtained medical documents and a hospital statement confirming that 11 of the dead had been hit by bullets. Ahmad, who lost three relatives in the blast, showed CNN two separate reports from the Daoud Khan Military Hospital stating that his brother and cousin died “due to gunshot injury and blast injuries” from the airport attack.
The Italian-run Emergency Surgical Center also said in a statement they received nine bodies with gunshot wounds in the hour after the explosion. Seven had apparent gunshot injuries to the head, and two had injures to the chest, a spokesperson said, adding the diagnosis was based on the “appearance of the wounds” and not an X-ray or autopsy.
CNN spoke to medical staff at five Kabul hospitals where patients were treated that night who said some had been hit by bullets, suggesting the total hit by gunfire could be much higher. It was not possible for CNN to access the bodies or assess the methodology of the doctors and hospital staff, and autopsies are rare in Afghanistan. While inconclusive, the pattern of testimony from staff across these separate institutions generates further doubt as to whether more than 180 people were killed by one bomb, as the Pentagon insists.
Tumblr media
Wounded women arrive at a hospital for treatment. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
Tumblr media
Volunteers and medical staff help an injured man. Credit: Wakil Kohsar/AFP/Getty Images
Tumblr media
A wounded man arrives at a hospital in Kabul after the blast. Credit: Victor J. Blue/The New York Times/Redux
One hospital, Wazir Akbar Khan, received approximately 60 injured people and 145 dead bodies, according to a doctor from the emergency ward who asked not to be named over safety concerns.
The doctor said he had examined the bodies both at night to search for anyone who might be alive among the dead and in the morning to look at the nature of the injuries.
“There was two kinds of injuries,” he said. “People burned from the blast with lots of holes in their bodies. But with the gunshot you can see just one or two holes — in the mouth, in the head, in the eye, in the chest.
“I removed bullets from four or five injured (people),” he said.
Another doctor at the same hospital’s emergency ward said he searched for his own relatives and any survivors among the bodies. He asked not to be identified for his own safety and said he saw many gunshot wounds.
“I can easily recognize gunshot wounds since we have long dealt with them in the hospital,” the doctor said.
Two other hospitals received a total of seven dead bodies with what doctors assessed as bullet wounds, according to medical sources.
“According to my 15 years of surgery in Afghanistan, bomb and bullet injuries are very different”
doctor at Wazir Akbar Khan hospital
CENTCOM spokesman Urban told CNN the medical staff had assessed the injuries incorrectly. US military medical examiners found there was no definitive way to determine objectively and scientifically the cause of death as being from a ball bearing or similar size bullet without a careful study of the internal wounds and finding the projectile that caused it, he said.
“(That was) unlikely to have occurred for a deceased mass casualty victim that arrived (at) a hospital during an ongoing massive trauma event,” Urban said. Investigators asserted there was “a lack of point of injury care, triage, and effective casualty evacuation” for Afghans in Kabul after the blast, he added.
The doctor who removed bullets from patients at Wazir Akbar Khan hospital disagreed and said he was able to determine the different injuries. “According to my 15 years of surgery in Afghanistan, bomb and bullet injuries are very different,” he said. “When a ball bearing enters the body it makes a big hole — different from a sharp bullet. When a bullet enters, it makes a small hole with a specific border and when it leaves it makes a big hole.”
US investigators accepted Friday they had obtained testimony solely from US and coalition personnel. “During the course of our investigation, we did not have an opportunity to speak with Afghans on the ground,” said one of the investigators, Army Brig. Gen. Curtis.
What the video evidence shows
Despite a large number of security cameras around Kabul airport and many Afghans posting videos on social media from the scene, there is limited footage of gunfire in the aftermath of the August 26 blast.
But some video appears to contrast with the US account.
This 33-second video was filmed at 5:40 p.m., about three minutes after the explosion.
It shows survivors of the blast frantically fleeing the scene. Gunshots can be heard.
The video also corroborates some witness testimony, as it shows what appear to be US troops on the airport wall and UK troops on the nearby tower.
The senior military official familiar with the investigation said any rounds were likely fired in the first three minutes after the blast, because no gunfire was apparent on a five-minute video shot by a drone, which started recording three minutes after the blast detonated. “At no point in time throughout this video can you see gunfire,” said the official.
CENTCOM’s Urban added of the drone video: “While this video is not definitive proof that no one was shot during periods of time when the scene was not observed by overhead cameras, they did conclusively demonstrate that the scene of the explosion was not the site of a mass shooting.
“Such an incident would have caused panicked fleeing that continued long after the shooting ended and the likes of which were never observed by any video,” he said.
On Friday, the Pentagon released that drone footage, which the senior military official said was never timestamped. The footage does not provide a stable, constant shot of the bomb’s aftermath, and it does not conclusively support the US assertion that there was no gunfire.
None of the footage obtained by CNN, or the Pentagon, shows US troops firing at civilians. The US official said investigators had not obtained surveillance video of the incident or aftermath.
What the experts say
The senior US military official familiar with the investigation told CNN during a three-and-a-half-hour briefing at the Pentagon in January that everyone who died in the August 26 attack was killed in the blast.
A number of bodies are visible at the start of the US drone footage, though the US official said they had not counted them.
The US official said their experts estimated the size of the bomb to be around 20 pounds (9 kilograms). However, the official noted that their explosives experts had only been able to access the scene 13 hours after the blast. “Their ability to do some forensic collection got really disrupted,” he said. “They did pick up some backpack pieces, things they thought might be part of a vest. None of it came back with any conclusive evidence.” Experts estimated the size of the bomb by comparing it to previous explosions done in tests, he said.
CENTCOM spokesman Urban said in addition to the 13 service members killed, 45 were injured, despite wearing body armor. “The device would have caused catastrophic injuries to the majority of Afghan civilians in the canal,” he said.
Tumblr media
Possible blood stains on the wall of the sewage canal. Credit: CNN
The number of casualties attributed to the blast “and the analysis of our experts demonstrated that such a device could reasonably be expected to have killed all of the 160 to 170 Afghan civilians,” he said.
But experts CNN spoke to were divided as to whether the death toll was unusually high for a 20-pound device.
Pete Norton, an experienced bomb scene investigator and former British Army ammunition technical officer with 30 years’ experience, said it was possible that a 20-pound bomb could have caused over 180 deaths near in the Abbey Gate setting, given the conditions at the time.
Other experts say the damage to the walls around Abbey Gate indicate the bomb may not have been that powerful.
Tumblr media
Possible ball bearings found in a pole near the Abbey Gate entrance. Credit: CNN
Tumblr media
Possible shrapnel marks from the blast. Credit: CNN
Tumblr media
The scene of the blast when CNN visited in November. Credit: CNN
When CNN visited the site in November, the stone walls were marked by what appeared to be pockmarks and blood stains. But there was an absence of significant damage to the walls and infrastructure, suggesting the device may have been smaller than 20 pounds, according to Chris Cobb-Smith, a war crimes investigator and ballistic and blast forensic analyst with 38 years’ military experience. Cobb-Smith, also a former United Nations weapons inspector, was hired by CNN and flown to Kabul to conduct a site survey.
“The number of casualties both dead and wounded is unprecedented for the alleged size of the device utilized in this incident,” he wrote in a statement.
Rachel Lance, an assistant consulting professor at Duke University, who specializes in injury biomechanics and the trauma patterns from blasts, also said the death toll of 180 didn’t align with the size of the bomb. She said the toll was much higher than any other explosion she was aware of from an improvised, person-carried bomb that hadn’t also involved a plane crash or building collapse.
“This death toll is wildly inconsistent compared to all known historical case reports for a bomb that was carried by a single person in an outdoor setting,” said Lance, who based her analysis on images provided by CNN from the scene.
The Pentagon account
The witness accounts, medical reports and expert evidence all raise doubts over the US version of events, which has changed in the months after the blast.
In a press conference on August 27, Maj. Gen. Hank Taylor, deputy director of the joint staff for regional operations, said one suicide bomber was backed by gunmen.
“What we know, there was shooters,” he told reporters. “(We) don’t know the exact number, but one with the suicide vest.”
He did not specify where they were located, only saying that the shooters were in an “enemy position” that was “just north of that gate area.”
In an interview published on September 15, the ground commander of the Abbey Gate unit, US Marine Major Ben Sutphen, told CBS News he had been standing 15 feet (4.5 meters) from the blast and witnessed a fellow American Marine get shot in the shoulder. The soldier managed to retrieve his weapon and “puts the opposing gunman down,” Sutphen said.
Following its investigation, the US military concluded that only UK and US troops fired their weapons near Abbey Gate that day, according to the senior military official. The Taliban did not fire at the scene during the aftermath of the blast, and there were no other gunmen present, the official said.
The Pentagon has since assessed that Sutphen’s statements were in error and based on what he had been told by fellow Marines, rather than what he saw, according to the official.
The US official said this, and “a small number of inconsistencies” in other sworn testimony from US personnel, were common in the aftermath of a devastating blast and did not alter their confidence in the narrative provided to investigators by US personnel.
“In general, the investigation did not believe that anyone who testified about an unsupported event was intentionally lying to investigators and attributed the most likely cause of the inconsistency to the concussive blast effect on the individual’s memory,” CENTCOM spokesman Urban added.
Families left behind
For relatives of those killed and wounded, the evidence poses questions that need answers.
On August 26, they hoped to flee the repressive Taliban regime.
Now, months later, many are stranded, in a worse situation than before the takeover.
Some families are still grieving loved ones who were killed. Others are separated by continents.
Ahmad went to the airport to help his family members leave the country. Now his family is torn apart. Some of his relatives who reached the area where the US was processing visas before the blast escaped on flights and received treatment in the US for their injuries. But three of his relatives who tried to flee Afghanistan died in the attempt.
Tumblr media
Morsal had been accepted to a French university and was trying to leave Afghanistan. Credit: CNN
Tumblr media
Noorullah says his cousin was hit by a bullet. Credit: CNN
Before the attack, Noorullah wanted to be in the US with his cousin Suhail, working towards a new life. After the blast, he visited Suhail’s grave each day, where he mourned both his cousin and lost dreams. Now he is in Pakistan, where he is being treated for the shrapnel stuck in his head, according to his uncle.
Morsal, who was hit in the jaw, is still recovering from her injuries. She and her family have since managed to escape to France, but the horror of the attack is still with her.
“Every night is like a nightmare for me. I cannot sleep. I just try to remember all my hopes, all my wishes to just live.”
Source link
0 notes
asfeedin · 4 years
Text
Ayrton Senna’s F1 cars through the years
On the 26th anniversary of his death at the 1994 San Marino Grand Prix, we look back at the cars Ayrton Senna drove throughout his illustrious Formula One career.
Tumblr media
Senna is widely regarded as one of the greatest drivers in racing history and he raced in some of the most iconic cars ever seen in F1. We start, of course, at the very beginning…
Tumblr media
American driver Juan Manuel Correa on the F2 crash that left him with life-altering leg injuries and claimed the life of Anthoine Hubert; his recovery; and his hopes of a comeback. Listen to the latest episode
1984
Toleman TG183B
A young Senna got his break with the little Toleman team, but the first model he raced was the car which had contested the previous season.
Senna would record a pair of sixth-place finishes in South Africa and Belgium, but the TG183B’s final race would be one for the history books — the 1984 San Marino Grand Prix was the only F1 event Senna ever failed to qualify for.
Ayrton Senna made his debut at the 1984 Brazilian Grand Prix with the car Toleman had used for the previous season. Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
The upgraded TG184 was introduced for following event in France, the fifth of the season. Its most famous performance would come with Senna at the wheel one race later.
Toleman TG184
A rookie Ayrton Senna rose to prominence with Toleman in 1984 after finishing second at the Monaco Grand Prix. Mike Powell/Getty Images
The rookie Senna announced himself to the racing world at the 1984 Monaco Grand Prix. The team’s new car was a step forward and Senna would be given an immediate chance to show his talent. Starting 13th with the rain pouring at the Monaco Grand Prix, Senna carved through the field.
The Brazilian caught and passed race leader rival Alain Prost just before the red flag was waved on lap 32. Senna initially celebrated a win, but the rules stated that positions must revert back to the lap prior to a race being called off. Senna had to settle for second position rather than first, but he had underlined his superstar potential.
Senna would visit the podium twice more, finishing third in Great Britain and Portugal, earning the attention of Lotus.
Mike Powell/Getty Images
1985
Lotus 97T
The iconic John Player Special livery and Ayrton Senna’s famous helmet colours were paired together in 1985. Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
Senna’s meteoric rise continued with the beautiful Lotus 97T, decked out in the iconic black and gold of John Player Special, in his sophomore year. Lotus was not the team it had been in the late 1970s and was still hurting from the death of team boss Colin Chapman in 1982, but Senna’s first season saw something of a resurgence.
The Renault-powered 97T would be competitive. Senna, who had replaced Williams-bound Nigel Mansell, would win his second race with the team, mastering heavy rain to win by over a minute at the Portuguese Grand Prix. Another victory followed at Belgium’s Spa-Francorchams circuit later in the year.
Seven pole positions across the year helped forge Senna’s reputation as a fearsome qualifier, which would remain one of his most revered traits throughout his career.
1986
Lotus 98T
Ayrton Senna joined Lotus in 1985 after his breakout rookie season with Toleman. Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
With his status as a future superstar now unquestionable, Senna threw his weight around ahead of the 1986 season. With ’85 teammate Angelo de Angelis leaving for Brabham, Senna vetoed the signing of British driver Derek Warwick. Little-known Scot Johnny Dumfries took over the role of No.2 driver instead.
In the season often considered the peak of the turbo era, there was pressure on Lotus and Renault to build Senna a championship contender. Renault’s EF15B engine would be one of the most powerful to ever run in a Formula One car.
Despite Senna recording eight pole positions across the season, Lotus was unable to convert that raw power into a title challenge. The Brazilian would have to settle for victories in Spain and Detroit. He finished on the podium on six other occasions but car reliability issues ultimately left him to settle for another fourth-place finish in the championship.
This would be the last Lotus to carry the John Player Special livery and its last with Renault, which withdrew from F1 at the end of the season.
1987
Lotus 99T
Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
Another famous colour scheme replaced Lotus’ John Player Special look, with the blue and yellow livery of Camal being introduced for 1987. Honda, who would become a key part of Senna’s career, joined as engine supplier.
The bulky 99T was fitted with active suspension which helped Senna to bumpy street circuit victories in Monaco and Detroit (Lotus’ last win in F1), although the system contributed to a car which was ultimately tricky to set up on a lot of that year’s courses. Senna would claim just one pole position throughout this season, but despite the 99T’s flaws he was competitive enough on Sundays to finish a career-best third in the championship.
Greater things awaited Senna, however, and his three-year stint at Lotus had caught the attention of Ron Dennis and McLaren.
1988
McLaren MP4/4
Ayrton Senna’s McLaren tenure started with arguably the greatest F1 car ever made, the MP4/4. Pierre-Yves Muel/TempSport/Corbis via Getty Images
Senna’s rise continued with a move to McLaren for the 1988 season and he was gifted the best car of his career. Some consider the Honda-powered MP4/4, designed by Steve Nichols, the greatest F1 car ever built and it remains one of the most dominant of all time.
MP4/4: Why McLaren’s ’88 car achieved legendary status
In this car Senna had one of his most legendary performances, at the Monaco Grand Prix. Senna out-qualified Prost by 1.427 seconds and would later liken the lap to an outer body experience.
“I was kind of driving it by instinct,” Senna later said. “I was in a different dimension. I was like, in a tunnel well beyond my conscious understanding.”
“That was the maximum for me; no room for anything more. I never really reached that feeling again.”
In his determination to humiliate Prost, Senna ignored calls during the race to slow down and crashed while leading comfortably on the Sunday.
Footage of that moment featured prominently in the 2010 documentary about Senna’s career.
youtube
The DNF did not matter in the grand scheme of the season, where the MP4/4 won all but one of the 16 races. Seven of them belonged to Senna and were enough for his first championship.
In a quirk in the rules, Prost actually out-scored Senna across the season 105 points to 94. However, only a driver’s 11 best results were counted towards the championship – in those stakes, Senna scored 90 to Prost’s 87.
1989
McLaren MP4/5
Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
McLaren’s dominant ’88 season had allowed it to put a lot of effort into developing the MP4/5. Turbcharged engines were banned and naturally-aaspirated engines made compulsory, meaning this was fitted with a 3.5 V10 Honda engine.
It was less dominant than its predecessor, winning 10 of the 16 races.
The MP4/5 is the subject of one of the most famous moments in F1 history, a major flashpoint in the legendary Senna-Prost rivalry.
While the teammates vied for position at the penultimate round, the Japanese Grand Prix, they made contact and came to a stop at the final chicane on lap 46. Prost retired from the race on the spot but Senna’s car was pushed back to the race track, pitted for repairs and won the race. However Senna was disqualified from the race result for his push-start, which handed the title to Prost.
Senna was outraged and vowed to never forget the perceived injustice of the decision.
Ayrton Senna signals for marshals to give him a push-start after colliding with Alain Prost during the 1989 Japanese Grand Prix. TOSHIFUMI KITAMURA/AFP via Getty Images
In something of a reversal of the previous year, Senna enjoyed the better season on paper, winning six races to Prost’s four. The relationship had reached breaking point and Prost moved to Ferrari for 1990.
1990
McLaren MP4/5B
Same colours, new teammate – Ayrton Senna was joined by Gerhard Berger in 1990, with rival Alain Prost switching to Ferrari. Sutton/Getty Images
With Prost gone, Senna set his sights on a second world championship, with the affable Gerhard Berger taking Prost’s seat. Prost had taken designer Nichols with him to Ferrari and McLaren entered the year with a modified version of the MP4/5, named the MP4/5B.
Once again it enjoyed a pace advantage in qualifying, which suited Senna perfectly, but it was well-matched by that year’s Ferrari. Senna again won six races and arrived back at the penultimate round in Japan with a chance to win the title, still seething from what had happened a year earlier.
Another infamous moment followed in the race. Senna had a slow start from pole position and Prost took the lead on the run down to Turn 1. Their cars wouldn’t make it any further than that, as Senna ploughed into Prost as the Frenchman moved across to take the right-hander. Both drivers retired from the race, meaning Senna was champion.
Allsport UK /Allsport
1991
McLaren MP4/6
Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
Powered by a Honda V12, the McLaren was the benchmark for the rest of the F1 field again in 1991. It remains the last F1 car to win a world championship with a fully manual transmission or a V12 engine.
Prost failed to win a race all year and was sacked before the final race following a dispute with Ferrari, helping pave the wave for Senna to become a triple world champion. The Brazilian won the opening four races and three more in the second half of the campaign as he finished comfortably clear of Nigel Mansell.
Senna’s most memorable win of the campaign was his first and only victory on home tarmac, the Brazilian Grand Prix. He lost third and fifth gear in the closing stages and was so exhausted from the effort of keeping it in the race he had to be dragged out of his car after finishing.
The MP4/6 would be Senna’s final championship-winning car, as McLaren’s period of domination came to an end — it would not win a title again until 1998. He would race a modified version of the car in the opening two races of the following season.
1992
McLaren MP4/7A
Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
This car was originally slated for introduction at the fourth race of the year, but a new rising power prompted a change of tact. The Renault-powered, Adrian Newey-designed Williams FW14 was a marvel. After seeing Williams win the opening two rounds, McLaren boss Ron Dennis brought forward the launch of the MP4/7A by a month.
With the new car Senna claimed three victories — in Monaco, Hungary and Italy — in what was his least competitive season since leaving Lotus. The first of those wins saw him hold off a charging Mansell around the streets of Monte Carlo in what has gone down as a classic F1 battle.
Mansell and Williams claimed the title that year and the era of dominance officially came to a close as McLaren’s Honda partnership finished. McLaren and Honda would re-form its partnership in 2015 for an ill-fated three-year partnership.
1993
McLaren MP4/8
Ayrton Senna’s final year at McLaren was with an uncompetitive Ford engine. Paul-Henri Cahier/Getty Images
With Honda gone, McLaren’s 1993 car was powered by Ford. Although Prost and Williams ultimately won the season comfortably Senna achieved some remarkable results early in the year, winning three of the opening six races and leading the championship until the seventh.
However, the car gradually dropped off the pace, while the Williams got stronger. Senna went eight straight races without visiting the podium in the MP4/8, which was the longest such spell of his entire career.
One of his three wins is arguably his most renowned, the 1993 European Grand Prix at British circuit Donington Park. In soaking conditions Senna passed Michael Schumacher, Karl Wendlinger, Damon Hill and Prost on the opening lap.
He would cap his McLaren tenure with wins at the final two rounds, Japan and Australia, his last before switching to the Williams team which was now the dominant force in F1.
1994
Williams FW16
Ayrton Senna would start just three races with the Williams FW16. Hewitt/Allsport
Senna’s switch to Williams promised so much but ultimately ended in tragedy.
The Newey-designed car was an evolution of the 1993 Williams Prost had claimed a comfortable title with, but without a key ingredient. The active suspension system Williams had pioneered in the previous two years had been banned and preseason soon revealed shortcomings with the FW16.
Newey would later say: “The 1994 car was not a good car at all at the start of the year. It was very difficult to drive. We developed the aerodynamics using active suspension and we developed them [to work] in a very small [set-up] window.
“Having had active suspension for two years, when we then lost it we had more trouble re-adapting to passive suspension than other people who hadn’t been on it for very long.”
Senna retired from the first two races, won by Benetton’s Michael Schumacher. Senna’s frustration at the start of the year was heightened by a suspicion Benetton was running illegal traction control software on its car, an allegation never proven.
Changes were made to the FW16 for the third race, the San Marino Grand Prix at Imola, but the world never got to see if they could have rebooted Senna’s title campaign. After claiming pole and leading away at the start, Senna crashed and was killed at the Tamburello corner at the beginning of the sixth lap.
Senna’s teammate, Damon Hill, was narrowly beaten to the title by Schumacher at the final race of the season.
Source link
Tags: AutoRacing, Ayrton, cars, F1, Formula 1, McLaren, news - au f1, news - in f1, news - uk f1, Sennas, Williams, years
from WordPress https://ift.tt/3aTDS2W via IFTTT
1 note · View note
xtruss · 3 years
Text
Biden's $735 Million Arms Sale to “an Illegal Regime of Zionist Cunts: Isra-hell” to Include Missile Type That Hit Gaza Tower
— By Tom O'Connor | Newsweek | May 17, 2021
$735 million arms sale to Israel approved last month by President Joe Biden would include the same kind of precision-guided weapons that the Israel Defense Forces use to target hundreds of sites across the Gaza Strip, including a tower housing international media outlets.
Congressional committee chairs were notified on May 5 of the weapons sale, first reported Monday by The Washington Post and confirmed to Newsweek by two congressional staffers. The notice came just days before the rising tensions between Israelis and Palestinians erupted into a deadly campaign involving rocket fire by Palestinian groups led by Hamas on one side and IDF airstrikes and artillery fire on the other.
The proposed U.S. package includes Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAMs) that convert missiles into so-called "smart bombs" with lethal accuracy and destructive effect. The sale is subject to a 15-day review that is set to end on Thursday, amid a sharp spike in the decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The deepening violence on both sides of what has already become the worst conflict between Israel and Palestinian factions in years has garnered international concern. It was one reportedly bloodless attack that has particularly captured global attention.
On Saturday, the IDF bombed Gaza's Al-Jalaa Tower, which housed the offices of top media outlets including The Associated Press and Al Jazeera, whose employees rushed out of the building after being given a warning of the impending attack by Israeli authorities shortly before the strike.
The dramatic destruction of the site, which the IDF argued was a legitimate target because it "contained military assets belonging to Hamas military intelligence," was captured in photo and film. The footage of the attack also reveals the munitions used, one that comes from the very same family of JDAMs included in Biden's proposed weapons sale to Israel.
Asked by reporters Monday about the planned arms sale, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki deferred to the State Department, which she said did not believe had announced "any future sales or weapons sales." She did, however, note the robust continued ties maintained between the two allies.
"We do have an ongoing and abiding strategic security relationship and partnership with Israel," Psaki said.
A State Department spokesperson told Newsweek that U.S. officials "are restricted under Federal law and regulation from publicly commenting on or confirming details of licensing activity related to direct commercial sales of export-controlled defense articles or services."
But given the ongoing violence in the region, the spokesperson added a call for de-escalation as the Biden administration works with regional countries in an effort to resolve the crisis.
"We remain deeply concerned about the current violence and are working towards achieving a sustainable calm," the spokesperson said.
Tumblr media
Smoke billows as a Joint Direct Attack Munition dropped on Al-Jalaa Tower during an Israeli airstrike in Gaza, a city controlled by the Palestinian Hamas movement, on May 15. The U.S. considers Israel a key security ally and contributes billions of dollars a year in military assistance, but President Joe Biden has expressed concern over the IDF strike that destroyed a building housing international media outlets who were told to evacuate. MAHMUD HAMS/AFP/GETTY IMAGES
The targeting and destruction of Al-Jalaa Tower have been condemned by a number of local and foreign media groups, including two of its occupants, The Associated Press and Al Jazeera, which launched its own investigation identifying the weapon that wrecked its offices as a GBU-31, one of several JDAM variants known to have been exported by the U.S. to Israel in past years.
As Israel faced pressing questions regarding the decision to take out the building, IDF spokesperson Lieutenant Colonel Jonathan Conricus offered a three-part rationale for the strike. He said the structure was "not a media tower, and it's not a media center," but rather a militant headquarters used by Hamas for three main purposes.
The first entailed "officers of the military intelligence, basically collection and analysis of military intelligence, obviously used for military purposes, against us."
The second was "research and development, where the best subject matter experts were operating from inside that building, using the hardware, computers and other facilities inside the building to develop weapons, military weapons against us as well."
And the third involved "highly advanced technological tools that are in or on the building."
Conricus declined to go into specifics, citing security concerns, on the final point, but said such tools were used by Hamas "in fighting against us in order to hamper or limit the activity of the IDF inside Israel and on civilian activity along with the Gaza envelope." He reiterated the extent to which the IDF has identified how groups like Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad embedded their military infrastructure "within civilian facilities."
He also emphasized the degree to which the IDF went out of its way to ensure non-combatants had left the building beforehand, even if this the forewarning "was also used by Hamas and Islamic Jihad, to salvage a lot of very important equipment. That, he said, "is a military loss that we are willing to 'suffer' in order to minimize and to make sure that there are no civilian casualties in the strike on the building."
Later that same day, President Joe Biden phoned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The U.S. leader expressed his support for Israel's right to defend itself, condemned Hamas' rocket launches and mourned the loss of life both sides. He also "raised concerns about the safety and security of journalists and reinforced the need to ensure their protection."
Netanyahu defended the operation in an interview aired Sunday by CBS News, in which he described Al-Jalaa as "an intelligence office for the Palestinian terrorist organization housed in that building that plots and organizes the terror attacks against Israeli civilians," making it "a perfectly legitimate target." He said it was thanks to the IDF that the building's inhabitants escaped in time.
"You weren't lucky to get out. It wasn't luck," Netanyahu said. "It's because we took special pains to call people in those buildings to make sure that the premises were vacated, and that's why we brought down that building."
The Israeli leader also suggested that he had shared with the U.S. evidence backing up the Israeli claims of Hamas' involvement at Al-Jalaa Tower, saying "we share with our American friends all that intelligence." Specifically, he said such matters are communicated "through the intelligence services."
Secretary of State Antony Blinken, for his part, told reporters Monday that he had "not seen any information provided" regarding the airstrike, "to the extent that it is based on intelligence, that would have been shared with other colleagues and I'll leave that to them to assess."
Following Blinken's consultations with regional officials, including Israelis, Palestinians, Egyptians, Jordanians and Qataris, Biden held Friday his third call with Netanyahu since the latest conflict began and for the first time "expressed his support for a ceasefire."
Tumblr media
U.S. Air Force senior airman and 33rd Aircraft Maintenance Squadron weapons load crew member runs checks on an inert GBU-31 V3 bomb during a weapons load competition April 16 at Eglin Air Force Base, Florida. The U.S. exports such Joint Direct Attack Munitions to around 30 countries around the world. AIRMAN COLLEEN COULTHARD/33RD FIGHTER WING PUBLIC AFFAIRS/U.S. AIR FORCE
Hamas has denied that it had a presence in the building, one of a growing number of Gaza high-rises reduced to rubble over the past week.
"The targeting of Al-Jalaa Tower is part of a series of war crimes and crimes against humanity that are being committed against civilians," Hamas spokesperson Fawzi Barhoum said Monday in a statement obtained by Newsweek, "in addition to the targeting of homes, residential neighborhoods and civilian institutions."
Abu Obeida, spokesperson for Hamas' Al-Qassam Brigades, threatened on Monday to unleash a new round of rockets against Tel Aviv if the IDF did not cease bombing what he called "civilian homes and apartments." The IDF on Monday stepped up its bombing of what it said were "houses served as a part of Hamas' terror infrastructure."
Hamas and affiliated organizations such as Palestinian Islamic Jihad have fired what the IDF estimates to be 3,350 rockets toward Israel over the past week, hundreds of which were said to have fallen short of Israeli territory and hundreds more of which were intercepted by the advanced Iron Dome defense system. Israeli operations from land, air and sea, meanwhile, have targeted hundreds, if not thousands of sites across the densely-populated Palestinian enclave.
The conflict's death toll is estimated have reached well over 200, with the Gaza-based Ministry of Health placing the Palestinian toll at 212, most from Israeli bombings but also including nearly two dozen killed by Israeli police in the West Bank, and the IDF counting 10 Israelis dead due to rocket fire.
0 notes
biofunmy · 5 years
Text
Hoaxes Are Spreading In State Media And Online About The Protests In Hong Kong
Carl Court / Getty Images
People hold up cellphone lights and posters during a “mums protest” against alleged police brutality and the proposed extradition treaty near the Legislative Council building June 14 in Hong Kong.
Protests erupted in Hong Kong this week, with organizers estimating over 1 million people attended a June 9 rally in opposition to a proposed extradition bill. Critics of the bill fear political opponents will be targeted and worry there aren’t enough safeguards to protect legal and human rights for defendants once extradited to the mainland. China’s previous behavior toward Hong Kong, such as abducting booksellers in 2016, has only fueled tensions.
As police and protesters clashed on the street, different types of disinformation began spreading online. Here’s a look at the hoaxes and falsehoods.
1. Chinese state media outlet China Daily falsely said the protests were in support of the extradition bill.
This article from Chinese state media is blatantly untrue and footage from that day unequivocally proves it was an anti-extradition rally.
Access to information is severely restricted in mainland China, and this shows how the government can use propaganda to mislead people and paint a false narrative.
2. A photoshopped image was used to falsely suggest a female activist was arrested for being “indecent.”
Ka Yau Ho is an activist and a member of the pro-democracy party Demosisto. That’s the same party Hong Kong’s best-known activist, Joshua Wong, belongs to.
A pro-police Facebook page, Salute to HK Police, shared a photo of Ho with nipples photoshopped on her shirt. This led people to speculate she was arrested for being “indecent.” But it’s an obvious fake and has since been deleted.
In a response on Facebook, Ho posted a real photo of herself from that night and said:
“The comments were basically comprised of people calling me a prostitute, saying that the police were cleaning out sex workers, and people saying that they were ashamed for my parents. The easiest way to attack a woman is through sexual insults. Ignore her will, ignore her vision, and focus on her appearance and way of dress, and then shame her from there.”
3. A viral video said to show Chinese troops stationed near the Hong Kong border is fake.
A video said to show a convoy of Chinese military tanks near the Hong Kong border went viral on Twitter. But the footage was not taken near the border, it was filmed at Longyan station in Fujian Province, over 320 miles from the border. A sign for Longyan station is clearly visible in the footage.
China’s foreign ministry also confirmed it is not sending troops to Hong Kong.
4. In a viral claim, people suspected that a police officer was actually a Chinese agent in disguise.
People used an outdated database to check the badge number of a Hong Kong police officer. When the database showed his badge number belonged to a woman officer, people speculated the officer was a Chinese agent in disguise. But the database used is 13 years old and not official. It only collects data on awards given to officers for long-term service and is therefore not a reliable source for current information.
5. China did launch a cyberattack against Telegram, the primary messaging app used by protesters.
Tumblr media
@DefTechPat @telegram IP addresses coming mostly from China. Historically, all state actor-sized DDoS (200-400 Gb/s of junk) we experienced coincided in time with protests in Hong Kong (coordinated on @telegram). This case was not an exception.
10:54 PM – 12 Jun 2019
During the protest, a DDoS attack targeted Telegram, the primary app protesters used to organize and communicate with each other. Telegram CEO Pavel Durov confirmed on Twitter that the cyberattack came from Chinese IP addresses.
Sahred From Source link World News
from WordPress http://bit.ly/31yYj1o via IFTTT
0 notes