#family law attorneys in Orange County

[ericccl]

Discover essential considerations for creating a thoughtful child custody agreement. Prioritize your child's well-being with expert guidance from Eric Child Custody Law. Read now!

[beardedmrbean]

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (AP) — A woman who pleaded guilty to dressing as a clown and in 1990 murdering the wife of a man she later married was released from prison Saturday, ending a case that has been strange even by Florida standards.

Sheila Keen-Warren, 61, was released 18 months after she pleaded guilty to second-degree murder for the shooting of Marlene Warren, Florida Department of Corrections records show. The plea deal came shortly before her trial would have started.

Keen-Warren, who has maintained her innocence even after her plea, was sentenced to 12 years in prison. But she had been in custody for seven years since her arrest in 2017, and Florida's law in 1990 allowed significant credit for good behavior. It had been expected she would be released in about two years.

“Sheila Keen-Warren will always be an admitted convicted murderer and will wear that stain for every day for the rest of her life," Palm Beach County State Attorney Dave Aronberg said in a statement Saturday.

Greg Rosenfeld, Keen-Warren's attorney, has said she only took the plea deal because she would be released in less than two years and had been facing a life sentence if convicted at trial.

“We are absolutely thrilled that Ms. Keen-Warren has been released from prison and is returning to her family. As we’ve stated from the beginning, she did not commit this crime," he said Saturday in a text message.

Marlene Warren’s son, Joseph Ahrens, and his friends were at home when they said a person dressed as a clown rang the door bell. He said that when his mom answered, the clown handed her some balloons. After she responded, “How nice,” the clown pulled a gun and shot her in the face before fleeing.

Palm Beach County sheriff's investigators had long suspected Keen-Warren in the slaying, but she wasn't arrested until 27 years later when they said improved DNA testing tied her to evidence found in the getaway car. Rosenfeld has called that evidence weak.

At the time of the shooting, Keen-Warren was an employee of Marlene Warren’s husband, Michael, at his used car lot. Since 2002, she has been his wife — they eventually moved to Abingdon, Virginia, where they ran a restaurant just across the Tennessee border.

Witnesses told investigators in 1990 that the then-Sheila Keen and Michael Warren were having an affair, though both denied it.

Over the years, detectives said, costume shop employees identified Sheila Warren as the woman who had bought a clown suit a few days before the killing.

And one of the two balloons — a silver one that read, “You’re the Greatest” — was sold at only one store, a Publix supermarket near Keen-Warren's home. Employees told detectives a woman who looked like Keen-Warren had bought the balloons an hour before the shooting.

The presumed getaway car was found abandoned with orange, hair-like fibers inside. The white Chrysler convertible had been reported stolen from Michael Warren’s car lot a month before the shooting. Keen-Warren and her then-husband repossessed cars for him.

Relatives told The Palm Beach Post in 2000 that Marlene Warren, who was 40 when she died, suspected her husband was having an affair and wanted to leave him. But the car lot and other properties were in her name, and she feared what might happen if she did.

She allegedly told her mother, “If anything happens to me, Mike done it.” He has never been charged and has denied involvement.

But Rosenfeld said last year that the state’s case was falling apart. One DNA sample somehow showed both male and female genes, he said, and the other could have come from one out of every 20 women.

And even if that hair did come from Keen-Warren, it could have been deposited before the car was reported stolen. He said Marlene Warren's son and another witness also told detectives that the car deputies found wasn’t the killer’s, though investigators insisted it was.

Aronberg last year conceded that there were holes in the case, saying they were caused by the three decades it took to get it to trial, including the death of key witnesses.

Michael Warren was convicted in 1994 of grand theft, racketeering and odometer tampering. He served almost four years in prison — a punishment his then-attorneys said was disproportionately long because of suspicions he was involved in his wife’s death.

He did not respond to a phone message left for him Saturday.

[twinxleaf]

LA County deputy faces possible charges in off-duty traffic deaths of two Marines-CHP investigators have recommended that vehicular manslaughter charges be considered against Deputy Michael John Miscione

327 days ago, my entire world changed. My parents drove to my job in Wilmington to inform me that my 20 year old brother and his friend had been killed in a car crash. We were initially told by the police force there that they had 30 days to complete the accident report. Then it became they had 3 months. And then…we found out that a member of law enforcement was the driver. James and his two friends were awaiting a tow truck after their car had become disabled after being side swept. They were waiting in their car in an HOV lane. California Police Officer Michael John Miscione, dob 1/11/1997, fell asleep while accelerating onto the highway, and crashed into the back of their disabled car, at 88 mph. Miscione crashed into them at least 33mph faster than the posted speed limit of 55mph. James and Samantha sustained many fatal injuries, but their COD is listed as blunt force trauma. After the crash, Miscione walked out of his own car and was found by the law enforcement first responding, where he was taken to the hospital. Miscione only listed injuries were “complains of pain to head, left hand, and left quadricep”. He was also not relieved of his policing duties during the 313 days we had been waiting for answers. To my understanding he has been on desk duty, and our families were unable to talk about the accident publicly as it took the department 313 days to complete their officer-involved accident report.

We know for a fact that the Orange County District Attorney Todd Spitzer has the accident report. We still need your help in encouraging them to make the right decision in prosecuting Deputy Miscione for vehicular manslaughter. Charges have been recommended, but we all know that can mean delay/delay/delay/coverup coverup/coverup when said charges are recommended against law enforcement. They need to know that the Pattons might be 2,600 miles away, but there is a zero percent chance their burying this report and transferring Miscione to a new department. They can be reached at this link - https://orangecountyda.org/contact/

I'm glad the article mentions that California Highway Patrol listed Deputy Michael John Miscione address and phone number as the one of the Century Sheriff Station - about 50 miles away from the crash site. The accident report also stated that Miscione did not have car insurance, which is its own legal issue. (However, he does have car insurance. They just wanted identifying the driver to be harder on the victim's families.) I wish the Orange County Register article had included that their vehicle got immobilized after being side-swiped against a wall by another vehicle that did not stop. I just don't want there to be any room for any speculations of victim blaming. It's clear all of this is part of a nearly year long coverup to protect Deputy Michael John Miscione from the consequences of taking two lives. Why is his future more important than the futures he ended due to his OWN gross negligence. My life has been in complete turmoil during the past year. I have been in so much emotional pain and anguish over the death of my brother, James Robert Patton. My older brother is struggling deeply with this tragedy. Samantha Berrios has three younger siblings who are also going through hell. We all saw our sibling's coffin being shut, and we've been waiting almost a year for California Highway Patrol to offer some sort of explanation. All of our futures need to be considered when deciding to prosecute Deputy Miscione for the crash on 11/05/22. How are the five of us supposed to go on believing in the legitimacy of any of our criminal justice systems if Miscione does not go to prison for taking the lives of our siblings?

[queermarzipan]

anyway entire article copy-pasted under the cut for those who don't want to look at ads

Fontana pays nearly $900,000 for ‘psychological torture’ inflicted by police to get false confession

‘In my 40 years of suing the police I have never seen that level of deliberate cruelty,’ says an attorney for Thomas Perez Jr.

Thomas Perez Jr. rips his shirt off during a police interrogation in the suspected killing of his father, who had been reported missing but was later found alive. (Screen grab from Fontana police video)

By TONY SAAVEDRA | tsaavedra@scng.com | Orange County Register

PUBLISHED: May 23, 2024 at 2:01 p.m. | UPDATED: May 24, 2024 at 3:13 p.m.

Within hours after Thomas Perez Jr. called police to report his father missing, he found himself in a tiny interrogation room confronted by Fontana detectives determined to extract a confession that he killed his dad.

Perez had told police that his father, 71-year-old Thomas Perez Sr., went out for a walk with the family dog at about 10 p.m. on Aug. 7, 2018. The dog returned within minutes without Perez’s father. Investigators didn’t believe his story, and over the next 17 hours they grilled him to try to get to the “truth.”

According to court records, detectives told Perez that his father was dead, that they had recovered his body and it now “wore a toe tag at the morgue.” They said they had evidence that Perez killed his father and that he should just admit it, records show.

Perez insisted he didn’t remember killing anyone, but detectives allegedly told him that the human mind often tries to suppress troubling memories.

At one point during the interrogation, the investigators even threatened to have his pet Labrador Retriever, Margosha, euthanized as a stray, and brought the dog into the room so he could say goodbye. “OK? Your dog’s now gone, forget about it,” said an investigator.

Thomas Perez Jr. curls up in the fetal position with his dog after being grilled by police to confess to killing his father — who had been reported missing but was later found alive. (Screen grab from Fontana police video)

“How can you sit there, how can you sit there and say you don’t know what happened, and your dog is sitting there looking at you, knowing that you killed your dad?” a detective said. “Look at your dog. She knows, because she was walking through all the blood.”

Finally, after curling up with the dog on the floor, Perez broke down and confessed. He said he had stabbed his father multiple times with a pair of scissors during an altercation in which his father hit Perez over the head with a beer bottle.

Suicide attempt

He was so distraught that he even tried to hang himself with the drawstring from his shorts after being left alone in the interrogation room. Perez was arrested, handcuffed and transported to a mental hospital for 72-hour observation.

But later that day, the truth derailed the detectives’ theory and their prized confession.

Perez’s father wasn’t dead — or even missing. Thomas Sr. was at Los Angeles International Airport waiting for a flight to see his daughter in Northern California. But police didn’t immediately tell Perez.

“Mentally torturing a false confession out of Tom Perez, concealing from him that his father was alive and well, and confining him in the psych ward because they made him suicidal, in my 40 years of suing the police I have never seen that level of deliberate cruelty by the police,” said Jerry Steering, Perez’s attorney in Newport Beach.

$900,000 settlement

Steering filed a civil rights lawsuit in federal court against the city of Fontana, alleging that police psychologically tortured Perez and coerced a false confession without first determining that the father had actually been slain. The suit was recently settled for nearly $900,000.

Perez agreed to the settlement rather than take the case to trial out of concern that a jury award could be overturned on appeal on grounds of qualified immunity for police. Generally, qualified immunity protects law enforcement officers unless they violate clearly established law arising from a case with nearly identical facts, according to the Legal Defense Fund.

Fontana police did not return an email seeking comment. Three of the involved officers remain employed with the department. One other officer has retired.

Why police were suspicious

So how could this happen?

In court documents and depositions, police say they had reason to believe Perez was lying.

First, they noted he seemed “distracted” and “unconcerned” during the 911 call, according to court records. Officers responding to the call noted the father’s cellphone and wallet were still at the home, which was in disarray. Police saw the mess as a sign of a struggle, but Steering said Perez was renovating the house and had argued with his father about it.

Additionally, a police dog sniffed out the scent of a corpse in the father’s bedroom. And there were small blood stains in the house. Steering later would say the blood stains were caused by the father’s finger-prick diabetes tests.

Perez’s lawsuit claims detectives also refused for several hours to retrieve his medication for high blood pressure, asthma, depression and stress.

Thomas Perez Jr. is interviewed by police in the killing of his father — who had been reported missing but was later found alive. (Screen grab from police video)

Emotional distress

Perez became so distraught that he began pulling out his hair, hitting himself, making anguished noises and tearing off his shirt while police encouraged him to confess, according to a summary of the case written by U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee.

“He was sleep deprived, mentally ill and significantly undergoing symptoms of withdrawal from his psychiatric medications,” Gee wrote.

At one point during the interrogation, investigators drove Perez to get coffee and then to some housing tracts where he had been looking to buy. Detectives berated Perez, insisting he did not need his medication and that they knew he killed his father, according to the case summary.

“When can you take us to show us where Daddy is?” asked one of the investigators.

Later, during their interview, the detectives told Perez his father’s body actually had been found already.

Asked in a deposition about his line of questioning, one of the detectives said: “I believed at the time if we told him that we had located the body, then maybe he would give us more information about what had occurred.”

Police, in court records, insisted Perez was voluntarily undergoing questioning and was free to go at any time. However, in her case summary, Gee wrote that the “circumstances suggested to Perez that he was not free to leave.”

She also noted that there was “no legitimate government interest that would justify treating Perez in this manner while he was in medical distress.”

Father turns up alive

Perez’s nightmare ended shortly after police got a phone call from his sister, who said their father was alive and well. He had actually walked to the train station in Fontana and rode the line to Los Angeles County to visit a relative and then took a bus to visit a female friend, Steering said. Perez Sr. later went to the airport to await a flight to Oakland to visit his daughter.

Police picked up the father at the airport and brought him to the Fontana station.

But the investigation didn’t stop there. Detectives obtained a warrant to again search Perez’s house for evidence that he had assaulted an “unknown victim,” according to Gee’s summary.

It appears none was found.

Perez was not released until after the end of the three-day psychological observation period. He then retrieved his dog from Riverside County Animal Services, tracking her down through an implanted chip, Steering said.

While Gee concluded Fontana detectives had sufficient reason to believe an offense had been committed, she criticized officers for their interrogation tactics.

“A reasonable juror could conclude that the detectives inflicted unconstitutional psychological torture on Perez,” Gee wrote in her summary judgment. “Their tactics indisputably led to Perez’s subjective confusion and disorientation, to the point he falsely confessed to killing his father, and tried to take his own life.”

Copyright © 2024 MediaNews Group

Kid reported his father missing

Police torture him into making him confess to killing his father

Father is alive and well

[socialfirms-news]

SoCal Firms Accused|of Selling Fetal Tissue

In a civil complaint that's already sparked political fireworks, the Orange County district attorney says two medical products companies and the family that owns them made huge, illegal profits by selling fetal tissue to researchers from samples donated by Planned Parenthood. Entering the politically charged area of embryonic stem cells and abortion, District Attorney Tony Rackauckas seeks civil penalties of $3 million or more from, DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences, and their owner-operators Andres Isaias, Estefano Isaias Sr. and Estefano Isaias Jr.

Planned Parenthood is not a party to the lawsuit, nor is it accused of wrongdoing. Rackauckas said at a news conference that Planned Parenthood did nothing wrong and did not receive any money from the defendants. Donations of stem cells and tissues from aborted fetuses are legal, but "the sale of fetal tissue and cells for 'valuable consideration' is illegal under both California and federal law," Rackauckas says in the Oct. 11 complaint in Orange County Court.

He says the companies, which operate out of the same address in Yorba Linda and are jointly owned and managed by the Isaias family, "obtained aborted fetus donations from Planned Parenthood and turned those donations into a profit-driven business."

They sold vials of fetal tissue for as much as $700 — a 2,700 percent markup from the $26 it cost to produce, Rackauckas says. "Defendants' conduct was knowing and intentional and in complete disregard of the law," the complaint states. "Indeed, rather than attempt to limit their income on sales to allowable amounts, defendants ignored their legal obligations entirely and affirmatively set forth, at the direction of the Isaias defendants, a business objective and plan to profit on their sales efforts." An attorney for the defendants, Michael Tein, said in a statement that Rackauckas's office has the numbers all wrong — that they "do not reflect the full costs of developing each bio-sample."

Tein, with Lewis Tein in Coconut Grove, Fla., said his clients never turned a profit. "This is a civil lawsuit over cost-accounting issues," Tein said. "We look forward to explaining the full story to the court." The district attorney's lawsuit began from an anonymous, confidential complaint from a member of the public, according to Kelly Ernby, the deputy district attorney in charge of the case. She said the case is about enforcing the law, not politics. "This case is not about whether it should be lawful to sell fetal parts or whether fetal tissue research is ethical or legal," Rackauckas said in a statement. While there is a "right to conduct stem cell research" in the California Constitution, the defendants were "treating human parts as commodities instead of giving it the respect the law intended," Rackauckas said. "This lawsuit is aimed at taking the profit out of selling body parts."

Anti-abortion groups quickly trumpeted the lawsuit to bolster their accusations against the nationwide women's healthcare provider. "This suit vindicates the brave whistleblowers of the Center for Medical Progress and every pro-life American who demanded the nation's largest abortion business, Planned Parenthood, and their partners in the harvest and sale of baby body parts be held accountable," Susan B. Anthony List president Marjorie Dannenfelser said in a statement. The Center for Medical Progress is the Irvine-based organization that secretly filmed Planned Parenthood representatives two years ago, allegedly discussing the sale of fetal parts. The videos the group released were heavily edited. A federal appellate panel heard arguments Tuesday about preventing the group from releasing additional secret videos.

The center's founder, David Daleiden, posted a statement on the company blog last week also calling for Planned Parenthood to be "held accountable." DaVinci Biosciences began in 2008 as a biotechnology research laboratory. In 2009, its founders launched DV Biologics as "a revenue-driven unit" to sell "products derived from the cells and tissues they were already collecting," according to the lawsuit. They realized that using small samples, such as fetal tissue donated by Planned Parenthood, they could grow many more cells and sell them to other researchers for almost any price, according to the complaint. Using one fetus donation, plus "just a few hours of time, and very little cost … DV scientists created hundreds of vials of fetal stem cells, which they packaged separately for sale on a per vial basis," the complaint states. As the company grew, it added marketing and sales staff and sold products across the globe, to Australia and China, Germany and Spain. From 2012 through 2015, DV Biologics made many hundreds of sales, bringing in more than $1.5 million in revenue, according to the complaint, and turning a profit in every year but the first. At one point, DV had a combined inventory of "pre-natal" and "post-natal" cell products worth $4.4 million, the complaint states, citing company documents.

Prices were set high to allow profits while leaving room for negotiations and discounting. The lawsuit lists costs and prices for several of the company's top-selling products, such as one derived from fetal heart cells. Vials cost less than $26 to produce and sold for $350 to $700, depending on discount. The California Health and Safety Code section that prohibits selling fetal tissue for more than cost "is a very specific statute right on point" in this case, Ernby said. That constitutes unfair competition, the district attorney says. He seeks a court order preventing further violations and fines of up to $2,500 apiece for 503 illegal sales made since 2012. The two companies also apparently have run afoul of California's income tax agency, the Franchise Tax Board. Rackauckas says the board forfeited DaVinci's "powers, rights and privileges" in 2014 and DV's last year. He seeks civil penalties of $2,500 for every day the companies operated in California since the forfeitures. Andres Isaias is president of both companies. He is the brother of Estefano Isaias Jr. All three are founders and managers of the companies, according to the complaint.

Prices were set high to allow profits while leaving room for negotiations and discounting. The lawsuit lists costs and prices for several of the company's top-selling products, such as one derived from fetal heart cells. Vials cost less than $26 to produce and sold for $350 to $700, depending on discount. The California Health and Safety Code section that prohibits selling fetal tissue for more than cost "is a very specific statute right on point" in this case, Ernby said. That constitutes unfair competition, the district attorney says. He seeks a court order preventing further violations and fines of up to $2,500 apiece for 503 illegal sales made since 2012. The two companies also apparently have run afoul of California's income tax agency, the Franchise Tax Board. Rackauckas says the board forfeited DaVinci's "powers, rights and privileges" in 2014 and DV's last year. He seeks civil penalties of $2,500 for every day the companies operated in California since the forfeitures. Andres Isaias is president of both companies. He is the brother of Estefano Isaias Jr. All three are founders and managers of the companies, according to the complaint.

[lenaperez]

The Role of a Spousal Support Attorney in Orange County in Achieving a Fair Financial Outcome

California law provides specific guidelines for spousal support in divorce cases. The court considers several factors when determining the amount and duration of support, including the length of the marriage, the standard of living during the marriage, the recipient's financial needs, and the paying spouse's ability to pay. However, navigating these laws on your own can be overwhelming. A spousal support attorney in Orange County understands the complexities of California's family law system and can ensure that your case is handled correctly, protecting your financial future.

For More Information, Please Visit spousal support attorney Orange County

[luisacarr]

What Makes a Great Custody Lawyer in Orange County?

Not all attorneys practice family law, so it's essential to find a lawyer who specializes in child custody and other family law matters. A custody lawyers Orange County with experience in handling complex custody cases will have a deeper understanding of the state's laws, court procedures, and the specific challenges that arise in custody disputes. When researching potential attorneys, check their areas of expertise.

[moradisaslawcalifornia]

Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach | Newport Beach (415) 306–8651 | How OC Divorce Attorneys Can Simplify Your Divorce Process

Divorce can be one of the most challenging experiences a person can go through. It’s not just an emotional upheaval; it often involves navigating complex legal waters. If you’re in Orange County (OC), California, finding the right divorce attorney can make all the difference. OC divorce attorneys specialize in family law and can help simplify your divorce process, providing you with the support you need during this difficult time.

In this blog, we’ll explore how hiring an OC divorce attorney can ease your stress, streamline the legal process, and help you achieve a favorable outcome.

Understanding the Role of OC Divorce Attorneys

OC divorce attorneys are legal professionals dedicated to guiding clients through the divorce process. They handle a variety of issues, including asset division, child custody, spousal support, and more. Their main goal is to ensure that your rights are protected and that the divorce proceedings move as smoothly as possible.

Key Responsibilities of a Divorce Attorney:

Legal Advice: Divorce attorneys provide expert advice based on your unique situation. They help you understand your rights, obligations, and the potential outcomes of your case.

Document Preparation: They assist in preparing and filing necessary legal documents, ensuring everything is completed accurately and on time.

Negotiation: Divorce often involves negotiations regarding property division and child custody. An experienced attorney can advocate for your interests and negotiate on your behalf.

Court Representation: If your divorce case goes to court, your attorney will represent you, presenting your case and defending your interests in front of a judge.

Emotional Support: While they are not therapists, divorce attorneys can provide emotional support by guiding you through the legal aspects of your separation, allowing you to focus on healing.

The Benefits of Hiring an OC Divorce Attorney

1. Expertise in California Law

California has specific laws governing divorce that can be complex. An OC divorce attorney understands the nuances of California family law, including community property rules, child support guidelines, and custody arrangements. They stay updated on any changes in legislation, ensuring that you receive accurate and relevant legal advice.

2. Efficient Case Management

Divorce involves a significant amount of paperwork, and deadlines can be strict. An OC divorce attorney manages these details efficiently, ensuring that all documents are filed correctly and on time. This reduces the likelihood of delays in your case, allowing you to move forward more quickly.

3. Objective Perspective

Divorce can cloud judgment, making it difficult to make rational decisions. An OC divorce attorney provides an objective perspective on your situation, helping you make informed choices. They can analyze your case without the emotional weight you may carry, guiding you toward solutions that are in your best interest.

4. Personalized Strategy

Every divorce is unique, and there’s no one-size-fits-all approach. An experienced OC divorce attorney will take the time to understand your specific circumstances, including your goals, concerns, and priorities. They can develop a personalized strategy that aligns with your needs, whether that involves negotiating a settlement or pursuing litigation.

5. Strong Negotiation Skills

One of the most significant aspects of divorce is negotiating the terms of your settlement. OC divorce attorneys are skilled negotiators who can advocate effectively on your behalf. They know how to approach discussions with the other party and their legal representation, striving to reach an agreement that is favorable to you.

6. Navigating Complex Issues

Divorce can bring various complications, especially when children are involved or when significant assets need to be divided. An OC divorce attorney has the knowledge and experience to navigate these complexities. They can handle issues such as:

Child Custody: Ensuring that your parental rights are protected while advocating for the best interests of your children.

Property Division: Helping you understand how assets and debts will be divided under California law, which generally follows community property principles.

Spousal Support: Guiding you through the process of determining spousal support or alimony, considering factors such as the length of the marriage and the financial situation of both parties.

7. Reduced Stress

The divorce process can be emotionally and mentally taxing. By hiring an OC divorce attorney, you can alleviate some of this stress. They will handle the legal complexities, allowing you to focus on healing and adjusting to your new reality. Having a professional by your side can provide peace of mind, knowing that someone is advocating for your interests.

8. Representation in Court

If your divorce case goes to court, having an OC divorce attorney is essential. They are familiar with the court system and can present your case effectively to a judge. This representation is crucial, especially if disputes arise regarding custody, support, or asset division. Your attorney will work diligently to present compelling arguments on your behalf.

Choosing the Right OC Divorce Attorney

Finding the right OC divorce attorney can feel overwhelming, but it’s essential to take your time and choose someone who fits your needs. Here are some tips for selecting the right attorney:

1. Research and Referrals

Start by researching potential attorneys in your area. Look for reviews and testimonials from former clients. Personal referrals from friends or family who have gone through a similar process can also provide valuable insights.

2. Experience and Specialization

Look for attorneys who specialize in family law and have significant experience handling divorce cases. An attorney who understands the nuances of divorce in California will be better equipped to guide you.

3. Initial Consultations

Many OC divorce attorneys offer free initial consultations. Take advantage of these meetings to ask questions, discuss your situation, and gauge whether you feel comfortable with the attorney. Pay attention to how well they listen and address your concerns.

4. Communication Style

Effective communication is key in any attorney-client relationship. Choose an attorney who communicates clearly and promptly. You should feel comfortable discussing your case with them and confident that they will keep you informed throughout the process.

5. Fees and Payment Structure

Discuss the attorney’s fees and payment structure upfront. Understand how they bill for their services and what additional costs you might incur. Finding an attorney whose fees align with your budget is crucial for managing the financial aspects of your divorce.

The Bottom Line

Going through a divorce is rarely easy, but having an experienced attorney from California Family Law Group by your side can significantly simplify the process. Their legal expertise allows them to manage the complexities of divorce while advocating for your interests, helping you achieve a resolution that meets your needs. By choosing California Family Law Group, you can concentrate on healing and moving forward with your life, secure in the knowledge that your legal matters are in capable hands.

In a time filled with uncertainty and emotional upheaval, having a knowledgeable guide from California Family Law Group can make all the difference in navigating the waters of divorce. Whether you are facing a contested divorce or seeking an amicable separation, their team is here to help simplify your journey and advocate for your best interests.

Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach 620 Newport Center Dr # 1100, Newport Beach, CA 92660, United States (415) 306–8651

Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach Moradi Saslaw | California Family Law Group | Newport Beach

[stevenkbloom]

Juvenile Dependency Attorney Orange County

Juvenile Dependency Law is highly specialized and different from any other type of law. A Juvenile Dependency Attorney in Orange County is essential in navigating these complex cases. Juvenile Dependency cases are, simplistically, when the Department of Child and Family Services, aka CPS or DCFS, files a case under the Welfare and Institutions Code Section 300 when a child is deemed at risk due to abuse, neglect, or other specific conditions outlined in this code. While the removal of a child from their home can occur, it is not always immediate or guaranteed; the court must find that the child’s removal is necessary for their protection. A Social Worker can justify doing this by stating allegations of neglect or abuse.

[familyfirstfirm]

Elder Law Attorney

At the Family First Firm - Medicaid & Elder Law Attorneys, we’ll help support you and your loved ones with Medicaid, wills, trusts, advanced directives, Veteran’s benefits, probate, and more. Whether you’re rejoicing in the birth of a child, planning for the future, or celebrating the life of a loved one, we’ll be here — by your side. Welcome To Family First Firm — Your Elder Law Experts™! Our team is your family's ally. With a focus on elder law, we provide compassionate support and expert guidance for your legal needs. Our experienced team understands the importance of planning for your future and protecting your loved ones. We approach each client with empathy and respect, treating you as a member of our own family. From the moment you walk through our doors, you can trust that we'll be by your side every step of the way.

Who Are We? We are an Elder Law Firm here in Central Florida. What we stand for says a lot about who we are, so let’s start with our core values. Our core values are the foundation of who we are and guide every decision we make, from who we hire to how we ensure our team stays aligned. Our Purpose Statement Our purpose statement explains why we do what we do. It's about taking care of our team, managing our clients' resources well, doing the right thing, and being part of our community. In short, it all boils down to one thing:

At Family First Firm, our dedicated team is the cornerstone of our practice. We understand the importance of having the right individuals in key roles to provide exceptional service to our clients. Our team includes skilled professionals such as Elder Law Attorneys, Legal Assistants, Client Advocates, and Administrative Staff, all committed to serving the elder community in Orange County.

Since 2009, we've been proud to serve families in Orange County, offering compassionate legal guidance and support. With deep roots in the community, we've assisted numerous families in navigating complex legal matters related to elder care and estate planning. Our commitment extends beyond legal services – we actively engage with local organizations and initiatives aimed at enhancing the lives of seniors in our community. What We Do And How We Do It While Family First Firm comprises a team of elder law experts, it's essential to remember that we are individuals too. Just like you, we have families and values that shape who we are. In an industry often characterized by apathy and legalese,, we take pride in offering a personal touch and empathy to each client we serve.

Every family deserves peace of mind, and it's time you find yours. That's where Family First Firm comes in. We understand that every family is unique, and we're here to support you every step of the way. Always by your side, we provide personalized legal guidance tailored to your specific needs.

Before embarking on any legal journey, we initiate a "Discovery Discussion" to ensure alignment between our services and your goals. We believe in understanding your objectives thoroughly before determining the best course of action, and we're committed to doing everything we can to help you achieve them. Our Services At Family First Firm, we understand the unique needs and challenges that come with planning for the future and ensuring the well-being of your family. With our comprehensive range of elder law services, we provide expert guidance and support to help you navigate complex legal matters with confidence and peace of mind.

[ericccl]

Explore the invaluable ways a family law attorney can support you. From navigating complex child custody cases to ensuring a smooth divorce process, our blog sheds light on the vital roles these experts play in your legal journey.

[beardedmrbean]

The U.S. Justice Department on Thursday released a withering report into the hundreds of Texas law enforcement officers’ fumbled response to the 2022 Robb Elementary School shooting, finding “cascading failures of leadership, decision-making, tactics, policy and training.”

The long-anticipated 575-page report detailed the many failures of the May 24, 2022 response, but concluded the most significant was that officers should have immediately recognized that it was an active shooter situation and confronted the gunman, who was with victims in two adjoining classrooms.

It noted that since the 1999 Columbine High School shooting, American law enforcement officers have been trained to prioritize stopping the shooter while everything else, including officer safety, is secondary.

“These efforts must be undertaken regardless of the equipment and personnel available,” the report found.

Instead, officers wrongly treated the situation as a barricaded suspect, even as children and teachers pleaded for help with 911 operators. It took 77 minutes for officers to confront the shooter. Nineteen students and two teachers died that day and 17 others were injured in one of the country’s worst school shootings.

The federal review by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services was announced just five days after the shooting. It was led by Orange County Sheriff John Mina, the incident commander during the 2016 Pulse Nightclub massacre in Orlando. In that incident, officers waited three hours to take down the shooter who had barricaded himself with victims in a bathroom.

A Justice Department and National Policing Institute review of that Florida law enforcement response was far less critical than the Uvalde report. It found that Florida officers mostly followed best practices, although it stated the law enforcement agencies in Orlando should update their training and policies.

In the Uvalde review, the federal team reviewed more than 14,100 pieces of data and documentation, including policies, training logs, body camera footage, audio recordings, interview transcripts and photographs.

The team visited Uvalde nine times, spending 54 days there, and conducted more than 260 interviews with people from more than 30 organizations and agencies, including law enforcement officers, school staff, medical personnel, survivors and victims’ families.

The Uvalde report’s release comes two months after ProPublica, the Texas Tribune and PBS’ Frontline published an investigation into the response after gaining access to a trove of investigative materials, including more than 150 interviews with officers and dozens of body cameras.

The material showed that the children at Robb Elementary followed active shooter protocols, while many of the officers did not. It detailed how officers treated the situation as a barricaded suspect rather than an active threat even as evidence mounted quickly that children and teachers were injured and with the shooter.

ProPublica and the Tribune have also revealed that some officers were afraid to confront the gunman because he had a deadly AR-15 rifle. With the Washington Post, the news organizations found that the medical response also was flawed and that two children and a teacher were still alive when they were rescued more than an hour later, but then died.

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is expected to discuss the federal report at an 11 a.m. press conference.

[orangecountylemonlaws]

Navigating Lemon Law in Orange County: Why You Need an Expert Orange County Lemon Law Lawyer

Buying a modern car can be an energizing encounter, but what happens when your unused vehicle turns out to be a lemon? In Orange Province, California, shoppers are secured by vigorous lemon laws outlined to guarantee they get remuneration or a substitution vehicle in case their car more than once comes up short to meet quality and execution guidelines. In any case, understanding and exploring these laws can be complex without the help of a learned Orange Province lemon law attorney.

What is the Lemon Law?

The California Lemon Law applies to unused and utilized vehicles that are beneath guarantee, acquired or rented essentially for individual, family, or family utilize. In case a vehicle includes a significant deformity that's not repaired after a sensible number of endeavours by the producer or authorized merchant, the customer may be entitled to a discount or substitution.

Why You Wish an Orange Province Lemon Law Attorney

Skill in Lemon Law:

An Orange county lemon law lawyer specializes in understanding the complexities of California's Lemon Law. They can evaluate your case to decide in case your vehicle qualifies as a lemon and prompt you on the finest course of activity.

Exploring Complex Methods:

Lemon law cases frequently include nitty gritty documentation, timelines, and arrangements with producers. An orange county lemon law lawyer is experienced in lemon law cases can handle these complexities productively, guaranteeing that all essential steps are taken to secure your rights.

Maximizing Recompense:

Producers may attempt to offer negligible remuneration or deny your claim inside and out. A gifted attorney knows how to arrange with producers to maximize your remuneration, whether through a discount, substitution vehicle, or financial harms.

Court Representation:

In a few cases, producers may debate the lemon law claim. An Orange Province lemon law attorney can speak to you in court in the event that case gets to be necessary, advocating for your rights and guaranteeing you've got the leading chance of a favourable result.

Sparing Time and Stress:

Managing with a lemon vehicle can be stressful and time-consuming. Enlisting a attorney permits you to centre on your everyday life whereas they handle the lawful perspectives of your case, giving peace of mind all through the method.

Choosing the Proper Legal counsellor

When selecting an Orange District lemon law attorney, explore for somebody with a demonstrated track record of victory in taking care of lemon law cases. They ought to have broad information of California lemon law statutes, involvement arranging with producers, and a commitment to accomplishing the finest conceivable result for their clients.

In the event that you discover yourself managing with a lemon vehicle in Orange Province, California, do not falter to look for the direction of an experienced Orange county lemon law lawyer. They can explore the complexities of the lemon law process, advocate for your rights, and assist you get the emolument or substitution vehicle you merit. Do not let a lemon vehicle acrid your experience – take action today with the assistance of a gifted lemon law lawyer.

[insideoutvietnam]

California’s Leading Personal Injury Law Firm Reaffirms Commitment to Client-First Policy with Launch of New Website

Newport Beach, June 20, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Newport Beach, California – Johnson Attorneys Group has earned a reputation as a law firm dedicated to protecting the rights of its clients and their families, ensuring the best possible outcomes for every case. Renowned for its client-focused approach and commitment to excellence, leading Orange County personal injury law firm Johnson Attorneys…

[trendingnewsmania]

ESTEFANO ISAIAS SR. AND JR. AND THEIR FETAL TISSUE COMPANIES SUFFER LEGAL SETBACKS

A father, son and their two Yorba Linda companies suffered some recent setbacks in Orange County Superior Court, where they are fighting charges of illegally selling hundreds of fetal tissue products for profit and treating human parts as commodities.

A judge on Friday overruled an attempt by defendants Estefano Isaías Sr. and Estefano Isaías Jr. to be dismissed from the case filed against them by the Orange County District Attorney’s office.

The OCDA in October filed a complaint that alleges DaVinci Biosciences and DV Biologics have engaged in unfair, unlawful and fraudulent business practices. The action seeks to stop the Isaías’ companies from selling fetal tissue and cells, make them pay restitution to those harmed (to be determined at trial) and to pay any other civil penalties a court imposes, District Attorney Tony Rackauckas previously announced at a press conference.

The DA insisted at the time that the case is not about abortion but businesses and their owners allegedly breaking the law.

The judge ruled against a demurrer or written response to the OCDA complaint that claimed the allegations against the Isaíases were ambiguous and too unspecific to substantiate legal action against them as individuals.

The complaint alleges the California Franchise Tax Board forfeited DV Biologics and DaVinci Biosciences’ powers, rights, and privileges in November 2014 and July 2015, respectively, due to failure to pay the required taxes and fees to transact business in the state.

David Daleiden, founder of the Irvine-based anti-abortion group Center of Medical Progress, created controversial undercover videos that connected DaVinci Biosciences, DV Biologics and Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties in March 2016. At the press conference that following October, Rackauckas said there was no evidence to support Daleiden’s claim that the companies exchanged money with Planned Parenthood or that Planned Parenthood did anything unlawful.

State and federal law prevents selling or profiting off of bodily tissues, but in 2009 DaVinci Biosciences started selling products derived from the cells and tissues they were collecting, processing, storing and using for research purposes, and DV Biologics began marketing the revenue-generating services, according to the DA’s complaint.

The two companies advertised prices: as low as $40 a vial for the “total RNA” [ribonucleic acid] cells from several fetal tissue sources to as high as $1,100 a vial for specific cells derived from fetal brain tissue; from $300 to $375 a vial for fetal lung derived products; $300-$450 a vial for fetal kidney derived products; $500-$700 a vial for fetal heart derived products; and $250-$700 a vial for fetal liver derived products, the OCDA alleges.

Between 2009 and 2011, the companies nearly tripled sales revenues and by the end of 2011 they unlawfully sold fetal-derived tissues and cells harvested in the U.S. to Japan, China, Singapore, Korea, Germany, Switzerland, Spain, Australia, Netherlands, Canada and the United Kingdom, according to the complaint, which adds that by 2012, they had more than 500 products in their inventory that they valued at more than $4.4 million.

The Orange County case against the two companies became a presidential campaign issue when political conservatives and anti-abortion activists connected the Isaías family to Hillary Clinton, who is, of course, a staunch supporter of a woman’s right to choose. Various members of the family—which is based mostly in Miami, Florida, but originally hails from Ecuador—have lavished Clinton with hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions.

Before the Democrat’s stunning defeat in November, the Clinton foes pointed to a 2014 New York Times story that reported while she was Secretary of State, her State Department requested lifting a ban on Luis Isaías’ sister Estefanía entering the country. She had been barred from coming to the U.S. after being caught fraudulently obtaining visas for her maids.

Roberto Isaías, Luis and Estefania’s father, and their uncle William are fugitives from justice in their home country, whose government blames them for the collapse of their bank Filanbanco, which had for many years been the country’s leading banking institution. It collapsed after it was nationalized in 2001, something the government blames on the Isaíases and vice versa.

While in the U.S., the family has diversified into real estate, bioscience and telecommunications. Having owned television networks in Ecuador (that the government also eventually took over), Isaíases now own Miami-based Wreal LLC, which counts among its companies Fyre TV. In 2009, then-CEO Estefano Isaías Jr. envisioned Fyre TV would become “the Netflix of porn.” Can a title about being screwed by a prosecutor be far behind?