#ernst kaltenbrunner
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
I was going through my CapCut and found this video I made like a 7 months ago or something like that 🙏🏻😭
#reichblr#heinrich himmler#reinhard heydrich#hermann goering#albert Speer#martin bormann#walter schellenberg#heinrich müller#ernst kaltenbrunner#hermann fegelein#austrian painter#joseph goebbels
76 notes
·
View notes
Text
Wdym yall dont like the austrian gang line⁉️🇦🇹
#reichblr#austrian painter#ernst kaltenbrunner#otto skorzeny#adolf eichmann#alois brunner#wilhelm höttl#august eigruber#amon goeth#walter nowotny#luftwaffe
79 notes
·
View notes
Text
guess who's back?? back again...😾🥛
no, I'm not canceling the horrific nazi ideology and their ideologues. they're disgusting. however, my artworks are just artworks, not more, not less. i'm portraying horror, but that doesn't make me horror itself. if you don't like my artworks, so please block me. be smart, be tolerant. fuck these nazis and check <my tg> pls🙏🏿🕊️
#reichblr#3rd reich#wwii#ww2#milchenkatze#karl doenitz#erich raeder#otto skorzeny#ernst kaltenbrunner#eduard dietl#hermann hoth#walter model
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
sketchbook drawings
if anything I don't support Nazism :3
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
Was it a prerequisite to have der schmiss as a member of the Austrian Nazi Party? Just curious….
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
E. Kaltenbrunner with Heinrich Hiimmler and another friends. NOT PROPAGANDA
37 notes
·
View notes
Text
by god he looks cozy
#reichblr#ernst kaltenbrunner#he’s in a wheelchair because of something or other during his trial period. this guy
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Arthur Scheidler(1911-1957) commented on the mistrust between WS and Kaltenbrunner.
He had been in the SD since 1935, worked as RH and later K's cashier, in charge of the foreign currency holdings of the whole SD.
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
Одна из моих недавних работ
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
✌#Ernst Kaltenbrunner: The Rise and Fall✌
Ernst Kaltenbrunner: A Key Architect of the Holocaust Ernst Kaltenbrunner stands as one of the most notorious figures of the Nazi regime, his name linked to some of the darkest chapters of the 20th century. As a high-ranking SS officer and key player in the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA), Kaltenbrunner had a pivotal role in executing the Third Reich’s policies of mass extermination,…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Photo
Einsatzgruppen
Einsatzgruppen ('deployment groups') were secret Nazi killing units, who systematically sought out and murdered civilians identified as enemies of the Third Reich. Operating without any legal restrictions in territories newly conquered by the regular German armed forces during the Second World War (1939-45), the Einsatzgruppen were responsible for over 2 million deaths.
The victims of the Einsatzgruppen included Jewish people, Romani people, intellectuals, local officials, communists, partisans, and anyone else considered enemies of the German Nazi state. Jewish people were a particular target as part of the Nazis' Final Solution. Victims were rounded up for immediate mass execution or internment in concentration camps. The activities of the Einsatzgruppen became clear during the post-war Nuremberg trials when both survivors and those directly involved in the units gave evidence.
The Final Solution
Reinhard Heydrich (1904-1942) was the first head of the Reich Security Main Office or RSHA (Reichssicherheitshauptamt), which included within it such terror organisations as the Nazi secret police (Gestapo), the criminal police (Kripo), and the military intelligence service of the Nazi Party, the Sicherheitsdienst (Security Section or SD). When Heydrich was assassinated by the Czech Resistance in May 1942, Ernst Kaltenbrunner (1903-1946) took over as the new permanent head of the RSHA. The leader of Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler (1889-1945), gave the RSHA three main roles: policing and repressing enemies of Nazism, gathering intelligence, and eliminating those people identified by the Nazis as being racially inferior. In none of these roles was the RSHA limited by any legal restrictions. Those identified as enemies of the Third Reich need not have been guilty of any specific crime, and they were given no legal representation or means of appeal. In other words, any civilian could be rounded up, imprisoned, and executed without any reason given whatsoever. Those who tried to defend the innocent were very often beaten, imprisoned, or executed themselves.
Heydrich and his chief lieutenant Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962) were assigned by Hitler many diabolical projects, which included the Final Solution, that is the extermination of all Jewish people (the Holocaust). Other 'undesirables' and, therefore, targets of the RSHA, included Romani people, freemasons, communists, those with physical or mental disabilities, and anyone who might resist the Third Reich, such as priests and intellectuals (including doctors, civil servants, and teachers). As the German army advanced into new territories, particularly on the Eastern Front, more and more "enemies of the state" had to be dealt with. Additional "enemies" now included prisoners of war, partisans, former members of local government, and anyone associated with the authority of the previous regime. To eliminate these "enemies", the RSHA was given the task of organising highly secret mobile killing squads, which operated behind the advancing regular German army and very often with its cooperation. These squads were the Einsatzgruppen.
Reinhard Heydrich
Bundesarchiv, Bild 146-1969-054-16 / Hoffmann, Heinrich (CC BY-SA)
Continue reading...
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
By: Michael Shermer
Published: Oct 13, 2023
As the horror of violence, rape, and murder of Jews in Israel by Hamas terrorists unfolded this past week I was astonished—and sickened—to hear the “whataboutism” and “bothsideism” response of many commentators and activists on the political Left that sounded eerily similar to the moral equivalency arguments I encountered when researching my book Denying History, on “who says the Holocaust never happened and why do they say it?” (co-authored with Alex Grobman). To be fair, some commentators on the political Right have used their platforms to blame Joe Biden for enabling or emboldening Iran to back Hamas terrorism—as Ted Cruz did on Megyn Kelly’s show—but at least the Right has the moral clarity to distinguish between genocide and complex political issues such as instituting a Two-State solution to the the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
By contrast, the progressive Left (a term I use to distinguish them from more mainstream center-left liberals and classical liberals) seems hopelessly adrift at sea without a moral compass. As I posted on X, what’s the difference between White supremacists at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia chanting "Jews will not replace us" and “You will not replace us” and Palestinian Supremacists at a rally in Sydney, Australia celebrating the Hamas murder of Jews chanting "Gas the Jews" and “Fuck the Jews”? If you go far enough to the Left you end up on the far end of the Right. (This is called the horseshoe theory, in which the far Left and the far Right are actually close in ideology at the two ends of the bent political spectrum.)
In another post on X I declared that it is not fair to compare Hamas to Nazis (which some on the Right are doing)—not fair to the Nazis I meant! Why? Because at least the Nazis knew that the orchestrated extermination of European Jewry was wrong and would be condemned by other nations. That’s why the Nazis murdered most of the Jews (and others) in secret, mostly in isolated death camps in Eastern Europe and Poland, such as Auschwitz, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor, Chelmno, and Belzec. That’s why the paramilitary Schutzstaffel (SS) Einsatzgruppen death squads responsible for mass murder, primarily by shooting, was conducted far from the prying eyes of German citizens in Nazi occupied territories to the East. That’s why the Wannsee Protocol, like that of most Nazi documents in dealing with the “Jewish question,” is obfuscated by innocuous-sounding jargon, such as:
action, special action, large-scale action, reprisal action, pacification action, radical action, cleaning-up or cleansing action, cleared or cleared of Jews, freeing the area of Jews, Jewish problem solved, handled appropriately, handled according to orders, liquidated, over-hauling, rendered harmless, ruthless collection measures, severe measures, special treatment or special measures, executive tasks, elimination, evacuation, eradication, relocation, and, of course, Final Solution (Endlösung).
That’s why this letter from Heinrich Himmler to Ernst Kaltenbrunner, who succeeded Reinhard Heydrich as chief of security police and SD after Heydrich’s assassination, is declared to be “Top Secret!”:
Reichsfuhrer-SS Field HQ April 9, 1943 Top Secret! To the Chief of the Security Police and SD Berlin: I have received the Inspector of Statistics’ report on the Final Solution of the Jewish Question. I consider this report well executed for purposes of camouflage and potentially useful for later times. For the moment, it can neither be published nor can anyone be allowed sight of it. The most important for me remains that whatever remains of Jews is shipped East. All I want to be told as of now by the Security Police, very briefly, is what has been shipped and what, at any points, is still left of Jews. Hh
That’s why at war's end the Nazis covered over their crimes, burned documents, destroyed the crematoria and gas chambers, and denied any wrong doing after. And that’s why throughout the 1930s the Nazis went to great lengths to change German law to later justify their actions as legal, under the pretense that if they lost the war they could argue—which they did at the Nuremberg war-crime trials—that national sovereignty precludes one nation judging the actions of members of another nation whose laws differed at the time. That defense didn’t fly and the murderers were brought to justice.
By contrast, far from denying their crimes, for the past week Hamas has been bragging about murdering Jews, posting videos on social media and declaring "Allahu Akbar" (God is Great). Worse, many on the progressive Left in the United States have been condemning…Israel! At The Free Press Bari Weiss has compiled a list of examples that reveal, in her words, “the rot inside our universities”:
Over 30 student groups at Harvard said of the 1,200 Israelis who have been slaughtered that “The apartheid regime is the only one to blame.”
A joint statement from Columbia University’s Palestine Solidarity groups wrote “we remind Columbia students that the Palestinian struggle for freedom is rooted in international law, under which occupied peoples have the right to resist the occupation of their land.”
Northwestern University’s Middle Eastern and North African Student Association “grieves for the martyrs and the civilians lost in this time.”
A student group at California State University in Long Beach advertised its “Day of Resistance: Protest for Palestine” event on Tuesday with a poster that showed a crowd waving the Palestinian flag and a Hamas paraglider—a symbol of mass murder—in the top corner.
At Stanford, hand-painted signs appeared on buildings declaring: “The Israeli occupation is NOTHING BUT AN ILLUSION OF DUST.” (In The Stanford Review, Free Press intern Julia Steinberg wrote that, on Instagram, “my classmates posted infographics declaring that, ‘from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.’ ”)
Students for Justice in Palestine at the University of Virginia declared on Sunday that “The events that took place yesterday are a step towards a free Palestine.”
To be blunt, these people are genocide deniers, almost indistinguishable from the Holocaust deniers I encountered and debunked over twenty years ago. Here is what we wrote in Denying History about the moral equivalency argument and why it is not just wrong but morally obscene:
Ironically, after denying that the Nazis intended to exterminate the Jews, deniers argue that what the Nazis did to the Jews is really no different from what other nations do to their perceived enemies. David Irving, for example, points out that the U.S. government obliterated two Japanese cities and their civilian populations with atomic weapons—the only government in history to do so. Furthermore, Mark Weber notes, Americans concentrated Japanese Americans in camps, much as Germans did to their perceived internal enemy—the Jews. These examples and others, such as Irving’s citation of the mass bombing of Dresden, have a not-so-hidden agenda: to implicate America and Britain as equally guilty, along with Germany, in the mass destruction of the Second World War.
But what is missing in this comparison? First, there is a big difference between two nations fighting one another, both using trained soldiers, and the systematic, state-organized killing of unarmed, unsuspecting people—not in self-defense, not to gain territory or wealth (although these may accrue as a beneficial by-product), but because of anti-Semitism. Scholars and the general public debate the morality of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the internment of Japanese Americans in concentration camps, and the mass bombing of Dresden. But historians do not try to equate these actions with the Holocaust. If we take the mass bombing of Dresden, for instance—although it was admittedly one of the worst acts against the Axis powers by the Allies, it resulted in about 35,000 deaths, not the 250,000 first claimed by the Germans (Goebbles exaggerated the number for propaganda purposes), and nowhere near the 6 million of the Holocaust.
At his trial in Jerusalem Adolf Eichmann, SS-Obersturmbannfuhrer of the Reich Security Main Office and one of the chief planners and organizers of the Final solution, tried to make the moral equivalency argument. The judge, however, did not accept his rationalizations, as this sequence from the trial transcript shows (and let this serve as a refutation of today’s claim for the moral equivalency of Hamas and Israel):
Judge Benjamin Halevi to Eichmann: You have often compared the extermination of the Jews with the bombing raids on German cities and you compared the murder of Jewish women and children with the death of German women in aerial bombardments. Surely it must be clear to you that there is a basic distinction between these two things. On the one hand the bombing is used as an instrument of forcing the enemy to surrender. Just as the Germans tried to force the British to surrender by their bombing. In that case it is a war objective to bring an armed enemy to his knees. On the other hand, when you take unarmed Jewish men, women, and children from their homes, hand then over to the Gestapo, and then send the to Auschwitz for extermination it is an entirely different thing, is it not?
Eichmann: The difference is enormous. But at that time these crimes had been legalized by the state and the responsibility, therefore, belongs to those who issued the orders.
Judge Halevi: But you must know surely that there are internationally recognized Laws and Customs of War whereby the civilian population is protected from actions which are not essential for the prosecution of the war itself.
Eichmann: Yes, I am aware of that.
Judge Halevi: Did you never feel a conflict of loyalties between your duty and your conscience?
Eichmann: I suppose one could call it an internal split. It was a personal dilemma when one swayed from one extreme to the other.
Judge Halevi: One had to overlook and forget one’s conscience.
Eichmann: Yes, one could put it that way.
In assessing the initial response to the rape, torture, and murder of Jews in Israel by Hamas this week I can only conclude that the progressive Left denouncing Israel and celebrating Hamas have had to overlook and forget their moral conscience.
#Michael Shermer#Israel#palestine#hamas#moral equivalence#morality#moral confusion#antisemitism#ideology#decolonization#ethnic cleansing#religion is a mental illness#The Holocaust#Holocaust
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
This pic of kaltenbrunner…😮💨
37 notes
·
View notes
Text
intro
jazzband der preussischen geheimpolizei | leitung ernst mosch | trompete matt | fluegelhorn klaus barbie | floete jens becker | klarinette mucki schaetzl | piano peter wicke | geige john cipollina | percussion ernst kaltenbrunner | drums hannes gappmayr | slide guitar der fuehrer | bass rudi hoess | hintergrundgesang reinhard fendrich und susi nicoletti
mei alte is der chef im haus
gesang elvis | gitarre john cipollina | ziehharmonika der fuehrer | trompete matt der bolschewik | fluegelhorn und beigesang klaus barbie | bassgeige eric clapton
rauschende birken
die egerlaender | gesang ernst mosch und matt mayr | mundharmonika der fuehrer | soloklarinette mucki schaetzl
servus pfueat gott und auf wiederschaun
gesang karl moik | die kapelle der preussischen geheimpolizei
ENDE
0 notes
Text
youtube
PREPARING THE POLICE (ORPO) FOR WAR - Roots of German Militarism № 3
Premiered Jan 3, 2025
There were two main Police forces of Nazi Germany under the Reichsführer-SS, Heinrich Himmler from 1936:
Ordnungspolizei (Orpo; order police) consisting of the regular uniformed police Gemeindepolizei (GemPo; municipal protection police) Schutzpolizei (SchuPo; state protection police)
Sicherheitspolizei (SiPo; security police) consisting of two sub-departments, the Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo; secret state police) and Kriminalpolizei (Kripo; criminal police)
In September 1939, the SiPo and the Sicherheitsdienst (SD) were folded into the Reichssicherheitshauptamt (RSHA; Reich Security Main Office) where they were made separate departments.
LEADERSHIP
The leadership of the German police was formally vested in the Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick from January 1933, who along with Hermann Göring exercised executive power over Germany's police organs; this was an important part of Adolf Hitler's effort to increase his administrative grip over the nation.
On 17 June 1936, Hitler appointed Himmler chief of the German police, which resulted in a "unified concentration of the entire police apparatus…and the administrative concentration of the police forces of the entire Reich."[2] This action effectively merged the police into the SS and removed it from Frick's control.[3] As Germany's most senior policeman, Himmler had two goals; first the official goal of centralization and Gleichschaltung: reforming the German police forces after Nazi Party ideals; secondly, the unofficial goal of making the German police an adjunct of the SS, thereby increasing his power base and improving his standing among Hitler's vassals.[4]
By August 1936, the Gestapo was standardized across the Reich, wherein all political police—of which there were seventeen different organs—were merged. Command and control of the Ordnungspolizei (Orpo) was exerted through Hauptamt Ordnungspolizei, founded in 1936, under the successive leadership of Kurt Daluege (1936–1943), who was later replaced by Alfred Wünnenberg (1943–1945).[6] Command and control of the Gestapo and the Kripo were since 1936 exerted through Hauptamt Sicherheitspolizei, and from 1939 through the Reichssicherheitshauptamt (RSHA). These organization along with the Sicherheitsdienst (SD), became departments of the RSHA—initially under Heydrich (1936–1942) and then Ernst Kaltenbrunner (1943–1945) until World War II's end.
0 notes
Text
So Bill Clinton had no problem going after leaders around the world like the leader of Serbia and having him tried for war crimes. He had no problem in going after and doing a manhunt for the warlord leaders in Somalia.
History.com
https://www.history.com › milosev...
Former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic goes on trial ...
Nov 24, 2009 — Former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic goes on trial for war crimes in Bosnia, Croatia and Kosovo
Miller Center
millercenter.org
Presidential transition: Somalia
Dec 8, 2016 — Once Clinton was in office, the operation became a man-hunt for Somalian warlord, General Mohammed Aidid. In
Roh committed suicide on 23 May 2009 when he jumped from a mountain cliff behind his home, after saying that "there are too many people suffering because of me" on a suicide note on his computer. About 4 million people visited Roh's hometown Bongha Village in the week following his death.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › R...
Roh Moo-hyun - Wikipedia
The Constitutional Court upheld the impeachment by a unanimous 8–0 ruling on 10 March 2017, thereby removing Park from office, making her the first Korean president to be so removed. On 6 April 2018, South Korean courts sentenced her to 24 years in prison (later increased to 25 years) for corruption and abuse of power.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › P...
Park Geun-hye - Wikipedia
On 2 June 2012, an Egyptian court sentenced Mubarak to life imprisonment. After sentencing, he was reported to have suffered a series of health crises. On 13 January 2013, Egypt's Court of Cassation (the nation's high court of appeal) overturned Mubarak's sentence and ordered a retrial.
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › K...
Killing of Muammar Gaddafi
References edit · ^ "Air strike hit 11 vehicles in Gaddafi convoy -NATO". · ^ Martin Chulov (20 October 2012). · ^ Beaumont, Peter; Stephen, Chris
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › E...
Execution of Saddam Hussein
Saddam was sentenced to death by hanging, after being convicted of crimes against humanity by the Iraqi Special Tribunal for the Dujail massacre—the killing of ...
List of Executions
Hermann Göring.
Joachim von Robbentrop.
Wilhelm Keitel.
Ernst Kaltenbrunner.
Alfred Rosenberg.
Hans Frank.
Wilhelm Frick.
Julius Streicher.
More items...
https://www.nationalww2museum.org › ...
The Nuremberg Trials | New Orleans
It's funny leaders in this country. They do crimes.They get off of the crimes and then they're given a golden parachute.
Other leaders around the World are killed.
I believe we need the death penalty for the President of the United States for all members of Congress for all government officials.
We have no problem in killing leaders of other countries of the World or calling for them to be put to death.
So i'm fine with former bill clinton president put the death....
So I don't understand how we can hold other countries leadership to this level and kill them and we don't hold our leadership to the same sword....
The primary purpose of the invasion was to depose the de facto ruler of Panama, General Manuel Noriega, who was wanted by U.S. authorities for racketeering and drug trafficking. The operation, codenamed Operation Just Cause, concluded in late January 1990 with the surrender of Noriega.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › U...
United States invasion of Panama - Wikipedia
In 2011 France extradited him to Panama, where he was incarcerated for crimes committed during his rule, for which he had been tried and convicted in absentia in the 1990s. Diagnosed with a brain tumor in March 2017, Noriega suffered complications during surgery, and died two months later.
https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki
Manuel Noriega - Wikipedia
So the United States has the most powerful military in the world.It can't be invaded and It's the richest country in the world and the u s dollar is the reserve currency of the world and countries around the world hold 46 trillion dollars in treasuries. I think that's around that much.In every year we sell 27 trillion dollars in treasuries and growing.....
But some reason are leaders.They can get away with literally murder and they get a golden parachute.... Where other leaders around the world we call further execution.....
So I believe we need the implement. The same thing here for our politicians.... For too long, we've been killing leadership around the world and we have been killing them and we've been letting our politicians get away with it.. It needs to end and they need to have the death penalty on the table....
0 notes