#engineering scholarship

[saetagency8]

What is harder, a B.Tech/B.E. in CSE, electrical or architectural?

AIEESE (Secondary) was established in 2012 and since then the examinations are held every year. The objective of such scholarship entrance examinations is to assist these brilliant engineering aspirants of Premier Institutes to avail the opportunity to get scholarship with up to four years tuition fees waiver to give financial freedom to candidates for their studies in these Premier Institutes.

[sonacollege]

Sona offers 100% scholarship to students with high cut-off! Make use of this golden opportunity to get admission to one of the top ranked institutions! Apply here : http://surl.li/hhpod

[fatherphaniel]

just found out the "founder of the discipline of chemical engineering" (my uni course) is from the University of Manchester and i'm like ???? dan and phil reference????

[sunmontuewrites]

Anyone with a Masters degree in materials engineering (or potentially related field) background looking for a PhD scholarship in New Zealand? I'm about to post this on my work LinkedIn...

PhD scholarship – Large format 3D printing with biocomposites

Background: We have a fully-funded PhD scholarship as part of the MBIE Endeavour project “Āmiomio Aotearoa: A Circular Economy for the Wellbeing of New Zealand”. The project is a collaboration between universities, research institutes, industry, community groups and government ministries hosted by the School of Engineering at Waikato University. It aims to pave the way through materials science, engineering, energy, economics, kaupapa Māori, business, law and regulation, social science and public policy for a more sustainable New Zealand.

As a PhD student at the University of Waikato, you would be focused on advancing sustainable manufacturing practices through the development and application of biocomposites.

The successful candidate will explore the use of biopolymers, recycled thermoplastics, and natural fibres to formulate high-performance biocomposites suitable for large format 3D printing (furniture, small structures, interior design). The research will delve into multiple aspects of these materials, including their performance, printability, design optimisation, and life cycle assessment.

This interdisciplinary project provides a unique opportunity to contribute to cutting-edge research at the intersection of materials science, environmental sustainability, and advanced manufacturing technologies. We invite passionate and driven individuals to join our team and contribute to this transformative research endeavour.

Your ideal background:

MSc/ME in a related Science/Engineering discipline

experience with natural materials

familiar with CAD design and 3D printing is a plus

experience in life cycle assessment is a plus

a willingness to learn, up-skill and work in multidisciplinary group

a professional attitude, good writing and time management skills

resilience to take on the challenge of the research experience

Value: a stipend of NZ$30,000 per year, domestic tuition fees and insurance, and support for research materials.

Application documents required

CV including contact details for 2-3 referees (including at least one academic reference)

Academic transcript from previous study undertaken (and thesis if available/applicable)

A personal statement (max 1 page) describing your motivation, interests and background related to the research project

English language Certificate where English is not the first language (IELTS/TOEFL)

LINKEDIN for contact details of the guy and you can see he's got the scholarship listed as well.

[girderednerve]

i have once more Read a Book !

the book was jim morris' cancer factory: industrial chemicals, corporate deception, & the hidden deaths of american workers. this book! is very good! it is primarily about the bladder cancer outbreak associated with the goodyear plant in niagara falls, new york, & which was caused by a chemical called orthotoluedine. goodyear itself is shielded by new york's workers' comp law from any real liability for these exposures & occupational illnesses; instead, a lot of the information that morris relies on comes from suits against dupont, which manufactured the orthotoluedine that goodyear used, & despite clear internal awareness of its carcinogenicity, did not inform its clients, who then failed to protect their workers. fuck dupont! morris also points out that goodyear manufactured polyvinyl chloride (PVC) at that plant, and, along with other PVC manufacturers, colluded to hide the cancer-causing effects of vinyl chloride, a primary ingredient in PVC & the chemical spilled in east palestine, ohio in 2023. the book also discusses other chemical threats to american workers, including, and this was exciting for me personally, silica; it mentions the hawks nest tunnel disaster (widely forgotten now despite being influential in the 30s, and, by some measures, the deadliest industrial disaster in US history) & spends some time on the outbreak of severe silicosis among southern california countertop fabricators, associated with high-silica 'engineered stone' or 'quartz' countertops. i shrieked about that, the coverage is really good although the treatment of hawks nest was very brief & neglected the racial dynamic at play (the workers exposed to silica at hawks nest were primarily migrant black workers from the deep south).

cancer factory spends a lot of time on the regulatory apparatus in place to respond to chemical threats in the workplace, & thoroughly lays out how inadequate they are. OSHA is responsible for setting exposure standards for workplace chemicals, but they have standards for only a tiny fraction—less than one percent!—of chemicals used in american industry, and issue standards extremely slowly. the two major issues it faces, outside of its pathetically tiny budget, are 1) the standard for demonstrating harm for workers is higher than it is for the general public, a problem substantially worsened during the reagan administration but not created by it, and 2) OSHA is obliged to regulate each individual chemical separately, rather than by functional groups, which, if you know anything at all about organic chemistry, is nonsensical on its face. morris spends a good amount of time on the tenure of eula bingham as the head of OSHA during the carter administration; she was the first woman to head the organization & made a lot of reasonable reforms (a cotton dust standard for textile workers!), but could not get a general chemical standard, allowing OSHA to regulate chemicals in blocks instead of individually, through, & then of course much of her good work was undone by reagan appointees.

the part of the book that made me most uncomfortable was morris' attempt to include birth defects in his analysis. i don't especially love the term 'birth defect'—it feels cruel & seems to me to openly devalue disabled people's lives, no?—but i did appreciate attention to women's experiences in the workplace, and i think workplace chemical exposure is an underdiscussed part of reproductive justice. cancer factory mentions women lead workers who were forced to undergo tubal ligations to retain their employment, supposedly because lead is a teratogen. morris points at workers in silicon valley's electronics industry; workers, most of them women, who made those early transistors were exposed to horrifying amounts of lead, benzene, and dangerous solvents, often with disabling effects for their children.

morris points out again & again that we only know that there was an outbreak of bladder cancer & that it should be associated with o-toluedine because the goodyear plant workers were organized with the oil, chemical, & atomic workers (OCAW; now part of united steelworkers), and the union pursued NIOSH investigation and advocated for improved safety and monitoring for employees, present & former. even so, 78 workers got bladder cancer, 3 died of angiosarcoma, and goodyear workers' families experienced bladder cancer and miscarriage as a result of secondary exposure. i kept thinking about unorganized workers in the deep south, cancer alley in louisiana, miners & refinery workers; we don't have meaningful safety enforcement or monitoring for many of these workers. we simply do not know how many of them have been sickened & killed by their employers. there is no political will among people with power to count & prevent these deaths. labor protections for workers are better under the biden administration than the trump administration, but biden's last proposed budget leaves OSHA with a functional budget cut after inflation, and there is no federal heat safety standard for indoor workers. the best we get is marginal improvement, & workers die. i know you know! but it's too big to hold all the same.

anyway it's a good book, it's wide-ranging & interested in a lot of experiences of work in america, & morris presents an intimate (sometimes painfully so!) portrait of workers who were harmed by goodyear & dupont. would recommend

[iliterallydecepticanteven]

So Bulkhead is said to be like from a rural planet and is the equivalent to someone being country but like are we talking a Midwest country boy, a Southern country boy, or an Appalachian country boy? Because those are all very different types of country boys. Based on him being absolutely massive, super smart in one subject, and friendly, I'm labeling him as an Appalachian country boy. His first pet was the Cybertronian equivalent to a possum he found in the woods and he has made energon moonshine.

[itsgerges]

Best Regards

The Gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field

1- Preface

2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?

3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection

4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System

5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?

6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data

7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves

1- Preface

My theory tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field moreover there's NO gravitational field) – and because the gravitational waves are reflected in the solar system- this article uses the gravitational waves reflection as a method to prove my theory – that's why the article tile is (The Gravitational Waves Reflection Proves The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field)

Let's refer to my theory before to prove by using the gravitational waves reflection

(i)

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies

Planet motion produces energy (1/2 mv^2) but where's this energy? Planet can NOT store its motion energy inside its body because It would raise its temperature- and no planet temperature is raised by its motion- logically- planet motion energy is stored in the space in moving waves –Means- planet motion creates waves in the space – by that planet motion is similar to a fish swimming in the sea- the fish swimming creates waves in the sea and- planet motion energy creates waves in the space- let's see the picture clearly- the fish swims because it hits the water by its body and that creates waves in the sea- by that- the water waves move by a velocity equal the fish velocity because of the reaction force- similar to that- Planet moves in the space and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by velocity equal this planet velocity- for example- Mercury (47.4 km/s) moves and its motion energy creates waves in the space and these waves move by equal velocity (47.4 km/s)-

(ii)

The planets revolve around the sun in the same one direction and for that their motions energies create waves in the space and these waves move perpendicular on the revolution direction (Toward Pluto orbit)

AND 

In Pluto orbit these waves are unified together into one unified wave- this wave moves by a velocity = 205.8 km/s = the planets velocities total (where The 9 planets velocities total=176 km/s but I add the Earth moon velocity (29.8 km/s) that makes the total to be 205.8 km/s – I add the moon velocity because the energy is stored finally in the moon orbit) 

Note- The moon and the Earth revolve around the sun together for that the moon velocity is considered equal the Earth velocity relative to (the sun) –

Shortly

The planets motions energies are unified into unified wave and this wave moves by velocity (205.8 km/s) – means- while the planets revolve around the sun, there's one unified wave revolves around the sun and moves by velocity 205.8 km/s 

This unified wave is the gravitational waves

The question is

The scientists discovered waves in the space and they told these waves are produced by the gravitational field but why?? because planet motion energy analysis proves the motion energy must be stored in the space as moving waves- so the discovered waves  are created by the planets motions energies and not by any gravitational field – also let's prove the sun doesn't produce a gravitational field to support my theory

(iii)

The Refutation Of The Sun Gravitational Field

The Sun Doesn't Produce A Gravitational Field Nor Has Massive Gravity – let's prove that in following

(a)

The sun rotation period is (25.4 days– at equator) and (34.4 days – at pole) that shows the sun has no massive gravity nor even ordinary gravity equal any planet gravity otherwise the sun would rotate around its axis in one period of time- 

(b)

No Planet Moves By The Sun Gravity–Newton is wrong- because- the planet moves by the force caused its creation- means- the planet creation and motion is done by one force only- because- if two forces have effects on the same one planet this planet would be broken- now- suppose the planet is created (by any force) and the sun gravity attracted this planet and forced it to revolve around the sun by the sun mass massive gravity (as Newton imagined) that would force the planet to move against its inner structure and will cause this planet to be broken- this is similar to a human is forced to walk on his hands in place of his legs and when this human refuses to do that (they told him we can force you by our power) for that this human walk on his hands forcedly and later this human is dead by this motion- shortly- the planet is NOT broken by its motion because the planet creation force is the force causes this planet motion- it's one force caused the planet creation and motion-

Newton mistake is that he didn't know how the planet is created and by that he didn't realize that planet creation and motion are done together by the same one source- simply- the sun didn't cause to create any planet and for that the sun doesn't cause any planet to move- this analysis shows logical base but left us with puzzles to know (by what rule the planet moves?) and (Why is the sun found in the solar system if it doesn't cause the planets motions?) these questions are answered in the paper abstract and discussions.  

(c)

The mass gravity force can NOT cause any motion- again Newton is wrong- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses- (the Earth and the moon are bond by the mass gravity)- by that they are similar to a lorry and its trailer – if the lorry moves the trailer will move with the lorry- but the mass gravity can NOT cause any motion- why? suppose the moon moves by the Erath gravity force- the moon moves and produces energy (1/2mv^2) and we have to ask from what source this energy will be provided?- from the mass itself- means if the Earth causes the moon to move the Earth and the moon masses should be decreased by the motion energy- this is a wrong definition for the mass gravity- the mass gravity creates a bond between two masses (The Earth and the moon) if some outer force causes the Earth to move the moon will move with the Earth and in this case the outer force will provide the motion energy for the Earth and the moon-

(d)

The planets order contradicts Newton gravitation equation- where- the gravitation equation tells (greater mass necessitates shorter distance)- clearly- Jupiter the greatest mass is not the most near planet to the sun- means- the planets order contradicts the equation- when we asked the physicist told us this problem is done by (the initial conditions)- all these are nonsense clearly- planet orbital distance does NOT depend on the sun mass nor on the planet mass- planet orbital distance depends on the neighbor planet orbital distance – my equation proves this fact- let's see it

Planet orbital distance equation (my 1st equation)

d^2= 4do (d-do) where d= planet orbital distance and do= its neighbor distance

Example (1) Venus orbital distance (108.2)^2 = 4 x 57.9 x (50.3)                             

d= 108.2 million km = Venus Orbital Distance

d0= 57.9 million km  = Mercury Orbital Distance

50.3million km=The Distance Between Venus And Mercury  Venus Depends On Mercury

Example (2) Saturn orbital distance (1433)^2= 4 x 778.6 x 655

d= 1433 million km    = Saturn Orbital Distance

d0= 778.6 million km  = Jupiter Orbital Distance

655million km=The Distance Between Saturn And Jupiter Saturn Depends On Jupiter

All planets orbital distances are defined based on their previous neighbor planets orbital distances- the equation is correct perfectly and all planets orbital distances are defined by it- my paper tests and discusses this equation

Shortly- planet mass has no any effect on this planet orbital distance definition.

Notice

Planet orbital distance definition depends on its neighbor orbital distance this fact is proved by many other different methods my equation is one method only of them, all these methods don't use any planet mass- all planets orbits are defined based on their neighbor orbits- (Please note- Newton gravitation equation is wrong- I don't critic it by many critics to short the discussion- but- the fact is that- the light beam created all planets orbits before any planet creation- the light created each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit- I prove this fact in the paper discussion- logically this fact kills the gravitation equation because the orbit is created before the planet creation)  

Notice -Newton is so far from the truth- let's give one more example- Newton told us planet moves by the sun mass gravity- the fact is that- the Sun itself is created by the planets motions energies- that's why Newton ideas are not interesting for discussion because his ideas are imaginary have no part of truth-

(e)

Also-Newton told-planet motion depends on its mass- means-planet velocity depends on its mass- this also is imaginary idea- I define planet velocity in the paper abstract- planet velocity is defined by many rules all of them don't use any planet mass- at all Planet mass has no rule in this planet velocity definition.

THE CONCLUSION

The Gravitational Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Sun Gravitational Field- Also-There's No Gravitational Field At All

2-Can The Planets Data Be Reflected On Each Other?

The solar system is created from one energy- and this energy is reflected on each other- for that reason- many planets data are reflected on each other- the energy reflection is seen in different data of planets – let's give 3 examples

Example No. (1)

Planet velocity definition proves planets velocities are reflected on each other –

(v1v2= constant = 322) (my 5th equation)

This equation proves the planets velocities are created in pairs and not individually- means each planet has its complementary – let's prove that

Mercury (47.4 km/s)   x Uranus (6.8 km/s)                   = 322

Venus (35 km/s)        x Pluto (4.7 km/s) x 2                  = 322

The Earth (29.8 km/s) x Neptune (5.4 km/s) x 2 = 322

Mars (24.1 km/s)       x Jupiter (13.1 km/s)                   = 322

Planet velocity is defined by many rules but our rule is the major one and all other rules depend on it

Clearly the rule (v1v2=322) tells the velocities are reflected on each other

Example No. (2)

The inner planets order (Mercury – Venus – The Earth) tells

Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates Longer orbital distance

(I proved Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus)

The original order was (Mercury – Mars - Venus – The Earth)

This order also tells the same rule (Greater diameter (and mass) necessitates longer orbital distance)

AND

The outer planets order (Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto) tells  

Greater diameter  necessitates Shorter orbital distance

Clearly the planets orders are reflected on each other

(Uranus diameter is greater than Neptune diameter but Neptune mass is greater – means – the order depends on the planets diameters and not masses) 

Example No. (3)

Venus orbital inclination = 3.4 degrees and

Pluto orbital inclination = 17.2 degrees

But sin (3.4 degrees) = (1/17.2)

I try to show that the planets data is reflected on each other but we need to defines which planet data is reflected on which

3- The Planets Data Reflection Is Done By The Gravitational Waves Reflection

Let's see the picture clearly

(a)

we see the planets data are reflected on each other – and we ask – how this data be reflected on each other?

(b)

The planets can't be reflected on each other – why?? because each planet is connected by its orbit- the planets are found in their orbits- the reflection of energy needs freedom in motion- we understand this meaning clearly

For example- I can use a mirror to reflect a light beam but I can NOT control the reflected light beam – the reflected energy moves free in space- here – if the planets are reflected on each other they will leave their orbits because they will be carried by the energy into the reflection direction-

I want to say- the motion in orbit is a feature of the planet – and the reflection is a feature of wave – planet motion can not support the reflection feature because the motion is done in orbit (defined position)

Shortly- the planets can not be reflected on each other

(c)   

How can the planets data reflected on each other if the planets can't be reflected on each other? how can their data be reflected?  

There are 2 steps to answer this question – I write them in (d) and (e) 

(d)

The  gravitational waves are reflected- in fact- the gravitational waves are reflected three times in the solar system- please pay attention- we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system

The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn

The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter

The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars

The gravitational waves are reflected and this reflection causes to reflect the planets data on each other

(e)

Why does the gravitational waves reflection cause to reflect the planets data?

The solar planets and distances are created from one energy – means – one cycle of energy is found behind the solar group creation and motion

This is similar to the blood circulation in a creature- the planets are similar to this creature members- the blood moves to this creature liver, kidney, heart and brain each member is similar to a planet- the blood moves through all of them- if this blood is poisoned all of them will be dead- if the blood healthy the members will be strong-

Similar to that

The gravitational waves are reflected and pushes energy in defined direction- each planet data is defined by this energy –and because- some energy moves in direction opposite to other energy (because of the reflection of energy) for that some planets data be reflected on each other-

Please pay attention

We have one energy behind the solar system- the reflection of energy causes part of this energy to move in opposite direction to the other part that causes the data to be reflected on each other and for that some planets data be reflected on other planets data-

The major problem in this explanation is the matter definition- because- the physics book defines the planet as (Planet is a rigid body created independently from the space and the other planets)- this definition is the problem because based on it the data can never be reflected on each other even if the gravitational waves are reflected let's provide a new definition for matter and prove it

Matter Definition

I have discovered (Planet Diameter Is Created Based On A Mathematical Equation) let's see this equation

My Planet Diameter Equation (v1/v2)= (s/r)= I

v = Planet Velocity                                                       

r = Planet Diameter

s= Planet Rotation Periods Number In Its Orbital Period

I= Planet Orbital Inclination        (example, 1.8 degrees be produced as a rate 1.8)

v2, s, r and I are belonged to one planet and v1 is belonged to another planet

The planet (v1) is defined by test the minimum error 

Earth Equation uses Neptune velocity

Mars Equation uses Pluto velocity

Jupiter Equation uses the Earth moon velocity

Saturn Equation uses Mars velocity

Uranus Equation uses Neptune velocity (As Earth)

Neptune Equation uses Saturn velocity

Pluto Equation uses the Earth moon velocity (As Jupiter)

(The Equation works from The Earth To Pluto) (the discussion explains the reason)

Example    

Neptune Equation (89143 /49528) = 9.7/ 5.4 =1.8               

89143                   = Neptune rotation periods number in Neptune orbital period

49528 km   = Neptune diameter

9.7 km/s      = Saturn velocity

5.4 km/s      = Neptune velocity

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (and Neptune rotation period =16.1 hours)

1.8 degrees = Neptune Orbital Inclination

The equation tells planet diameter is created based on its velocity –means- Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s

The Equation Concept

Planet diameter should be a function in its orbital distance –otherwise- this planet would be broken by its motion- the fact is that – The necessary requirement for planet safe motion is to create a function between this planet diameter and its orbital distance

BUT- the designer can't create a function has only 2 variables (Planet diameter and its orbital distance)- the function in this case can't be useful because– If this planet changes its orbital distance its diameter would be broken also because the diameter is a direct function in the orbital distance without any other variables -As A Result  

The designer created planet diameter as a function in this planet rotation period and planet rotation period is created as a function in this planet velocity and planet velocity is created as a function in this planet orbital distance- by that- the function between planet diameter and its orbital distance is created but the function contains also more variables (rotation period, orbital period and velocity)- by that- if a planet changes its orbital distance- this planet diameter will not be changed but its rotation period, orbital period, and velocity will be changed and the diameter will be saved-

NOTICE-

Mars is the example for this theory because Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated from its original orbit to its current one- after Migration Mars changed its motion data but Mars diameter is saved

NOTICE-

Planet diameter equation is very useful to analyze the energy reflection in the solar system because the equation shows the changes in data resulting from the energy reflection- for example- the equation produces the planet orbital inclination-but in Saturn equation- the equation produces the value (0.4) while we know Saturn orbital inclination is 2.5 degrees- the value (0.4) is produced because the energy is reflected in Saturn and that caused effect on the data by that the value (2.5) become (1/2.5)=0.4

 Matter Definition (Deep Analysis)  

What's The Matter And How Is Created?

The matter and space are created from the same one energy and both move with the motion of this energy from which they are created- but- the matter creates for itself a distinguish form and moves by different velocity from the space motion (notice the gravitational waves prove the space has motion and not static).

This is similar to the sea of water- the space is similar to the sea of water and the matter is similar to a whirlpool (vortex) found on the sea page-

The whirlpool (vortex) is created by the sea water and it's carried by the sea water motion- spite of that- the whirlpool is different in its form from the sea waves – also the whirlpool moves by different velocity from the sea waves motion velocity- this example gives explanation for the matter definition- the matter is similar perfectly to the whirlpool on the sea page- it's created by the sea water motion but it has a distinguish form and different velocity from the sea waves-

Also

The whirlpool dimensions depend on the sea water motion features- for example – we have a whirlpool its diameter is 2 meters, this diameter is formed by the sea water motion features (the water velocity- amount-pressure -……etc) that tells the whirlpool is found later after the sea creation- and the water motion is found before the whirlpool creation- this meaning is a fact for the matter creation and dimensions- the matter dimensions are created based on this matter motion- means- the motion is defined before the matter creation- this is proved strongly by my planet diameter equation- the equation tells (for example) Neptune diameter is 49528 km because Neptune velocity is 5.4 km/s- the whirlpool idea explains how the planet matter data is defined based on its motion- because

The original energy was found in motion at first and the planet matter is created from this moving original energy and the planet matter dimensions are defined by this original energy motion features- after the planet creation, the planet moves with this original energy motion means the planet moves this same motion based on which the planet data is created that's why the planet data is in full harmony with the planet motion features.

Also the idea shows the planet motion reason- as I proved before- no planet moves by the sun gravity- Newton is wrong- because the planet creation and motion are done by one force only otherwise this planet would be broken if two forces have effects on it- here we see the planet motion reason- the planet moves with the original energy from which this planet is created     

4- The Gravitational Waves Are Reflected Three Times In The Solar System

Please pay attention - we deal with one gravitational wave and this one gravitational wave is reflected three times in the solar system

The wave first reflection from Neptune to Saturn

The wave second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter

The wave third reflection from Venus to Mars

The planets data is reflected according to this table – for that we need to define each reflection in details to see the reflected data between the two planets

5- Why Does The Gravitational Waves Reflection Prove The Waves Are Produced By The Planets Motions Energies And Not By The Gravitational Field?

Let's suppose the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field as the physics book tells- the waves are reflected and caused changes for the planets data- as I prove in the next point- that means – the gravitational waves provides new energy for the planets which caused the planets data to be effected by the gravitational waves reflection- this will add new energy for these planets and the whole solar system-

This is similar to the rains on Earth- we know- the rains is vaporized water from the seas and rivers and this vaporized water is found in the clouds which cause the rains

Means- we don't imagine the water is found in the sky by itself – and we don't think the rains water is new water found in the sky without water vaporization from the seas and rivers- because- if the rain water is found in the sky by itself without vaporization for the seas water that will add new water on the Earth- and that will cause the whole Earth to be drown in water and no ground will be found because the rains add new water to the Earth-

Similar to that- if we suppose- the gravitational waves are produced by the gravitational field and these waves are reflected and cause effects on the planets data because these waves add new energy for the planets – this new energy will increase the solar system energy – this is a wrong idea- because

No source of energy can cause the continuous increase for the solar system energy

The solar system stability in motion proves no change in energy is found

The planets orbital periods are not changed prove the solar system energy is a stable value has no change

Shortly- the solar system energy is defined stable value of energy moves in a cycle (as the sea water and rains) –

This analysis proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and by that the gravitational waves effect on the planets data is a part of the energy cycle where these waves energy is produced by the planets motions and this energy has effects on these planets shows a complete cycle of energy.

Means

The solar system energy is stable- the reflection of energy causes to accumulate the energy in one point but the energy before the accumulation equal the energy after the accumulation- the reflection causes to accumulate the energy in one point only

The conclusion

The gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field (even if found) 

6- The Gravitational Waves Reflection Effect On The Planets Data

The Data Changes

 The gravitational waves reflection causes basic changes in planets data let's refer to these changes in following 

What's used as (A) before the reflection will be used as (1/A) after the reflection.

What's used as (a distance) before the reflection will be used as (a period of time) after the reflection

The velocities be squared –the rate (v1/v2) before reflection will be (v1/v2)^2 after the reflection.

The energy direction is changed by the reflection

The players of the rates of time are reflected also –

Notice – the gravitational waves reflection needs three planets –as we have seen - the 1st reflection (from Neptune to Saturn) and between them Uranus – also the 2nd reflection (from Uranus to Jupiter) and between them Saturn–  and also the 3rd reflection (from Venus to Mars) and between them The Earth– that shows three planets are used in each reflection- the middle planet is effected also by the wave reflection as we will see in the data discussion – shortly – No reflection can be done by two neighbors planets - 

These changes are done with each reflection for the gravitational waves- the planets data proves this fact as we will see in the data analysis and comparison

Let's see how these changes have effects on the planets data in the next point no. (7)

7- The Planets Data Reflection Proves

Group Data No (I)

(1)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Venus to Mars – For that

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

And

687 days x 2π      = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π      = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

(2)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Uranus to Jupiter– For That 

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The  period4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π    = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π    = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π    =  90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

(3)

The gravitational waves are reflected from Neptune to Saturn–

BUT

The distance 1433 mkm is still a distance And

(1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm                       = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm   x 4π  = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days   x 8π  = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

Discussion

(1)

The data shows the following

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Venus To Mars Defines Mars, Jupiter And Saturn Orbital Periods

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Uranus To Jupiter Defines Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Periods

The Gravitational Wave Reflection From Neptune To Saturn Defines Saturn, Uranus, Neptune And Pluto Orbital Circumference

This data proved my planet definition (the planets are geometrical points carried by the same one energy- or- the planets are geometrical points found on the same one light beam- and the planets move with this light beam motion- and the planets are created depending on each other and No planet is independent from the others in its creation and motion) – means- the planets are similar to whirlpools (vortex) found on the sea water page- we can imagine many whirlpools (vortex) are found on the same one sea and they are near to each other- this picture is very similar to the planets nature- that explains how the reflection of energy for one time can define the orbital periods for three planets (or 4 planets) together-

Here we imagine there are 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and then one strong wave of water passed through these 4 whirlpools (vortex), and this water wave motion causes effects on the 4 whirlpools-

This information is so important because one motion only (one wave reflection) can cause to define three or four planets data that proves strongly the planets Can NOT be independent neither in Creation Nor in motion- the planets are created and moving depends on each other because all of them are created from the same one energy and they move with this same energy motion-

NOTICE Let's imagine we have 4 whirlpools (vortex) on the sea page near to each other and one strong water wave passes through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)  - now – suppose we put some red color on this strong water wave- what would happen? The water color will be red and the red water will pass through these 4 whirlpools (vortex)  

We pay attention here because one reflection of energy can define the orbital periods of three planets – Means – all of them must be dependent on this reflected energy.

That tells the planets are NOT independent but they are dependent on the mother energy from which they are created and that caused they to be dependent on each other – Now let's analyze each reflection individually

(1) The Third Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Venus To Mars)

224.7 days (Venus orbital period) is changed into 227.9 mkm (Mars orbital distance)

AND-

680 mkm (Venus Orbital Circumference) is changed into 687 days (Mars orbital period)- (max error 1.5%) –

As the rule tells (what's used as distance before the reflection be used as a period of time after the reflection and vice versa)

The orbital periods definition

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We don't discuss the precession cycle here

(Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate 0.8 we should discuss later)

The data shows, the planets orbital periods are defined by the rates (2π, 4π, 6π)

It's not clear yet why the design uses these rates to define the planets orbital periods but this is the rule we will see it in the other two reflections of energy.

The important notice here tells that- the gravitational wave reflection for one time defines 3 planets orbital periods – this fact is proved strongly by the data and it disproves the wrong idea tells (Planet is created independently from the other planets) 

(2) The Second Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Uranus To Jupiter)

Here we have a clear problem – let's see the data

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm is Changed Into The  period 4900 days

And

4900 days x 2π    = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π    = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period)                (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π    =  90560 days (Pluto orbital period)                             (error 2%)

We see clearly, the data distribution is typical to the previous data of the third reflection- let's compare them

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

687 days x 2π = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

Jupiter orbital circumference 4900mkm is Changed Into The  period 4900 days  

4900 days x 2π = 30589 days (Uranus orbital period)

4900 days x 4π = 59800 days (Neptune orbital period) (error 3%)

4900 days x 6π = 90560 days (Pluto orbital period) (error 2%)

The comparison shows the data is almost typical- by that- we have to suppose- the gravitational wave is reflected from Jupiter to Uranus- It is NOT Fact–because

The gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter (and then to Venus) – we see clearly the problem where the data distribution is reversed the wave reflection direction-

Notice - please note clearly – we deal with one gravitational wave only- there are NOT three gravitational wave and each wave is reflected in one reflection- it's NOT Fact – the fact is that- it's one gravitational wave reflected three times in the solar system- the comparison next data proves this fact and gives no area for any doubt-

It's one gravitational wave sent from Pluto to Neptune and reflected to Saturn then this same wave is sent from Saturn to Uranus and Uranus reflected the same wave to Jupiter and Jupiter sent the same wave to Venus and Venus reflected the same wave to Mars- One Gravitational Wave moves through all these planets        

The Conclusion

The planets data is distributed in the reversed direction for the reflected energy- the energy is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter but the data is distributed from Jupiter to Uranus- there's a geometrical reason for this behavior we should discover later.

(3) The First Reflection (The Wave Is Reflected From Neptune To Saturn)

We still have another problem- let's remember this problem reason

The gravitational wave first reflection is done from Pluto to Neptune, supposing Neptune would send the energy to Uranus but Neptune didn't send the energy instead Neptune kept the energy inside its orbit and prevent it to move toward Uranus – also Uranus itself couldn't release the imprisoned energy from Neptune orbit – and that necessitated Saturn itself to create interaction with Neptune to release the imprisoned energy for that the energy is moved toward Saturn immediately by that this reflection of the wave is considered the first reflection because the energy is released from Neptune to Saturn directly – Shortly- the wave energy is sent from Pluto to Neptune and the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and this is the first reflection of the energy (the gravitational wave first reflection)

Let's see the data - The distance 1433 mkm (Saturn orbital distance) is still a distance And (1410 mkm = Pluto Neptune Distance)

1433 mkm                       = Mars orbital circumference

1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm   x 4π  = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days   x 8π  = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

The data follows the rule (2π, 4π, 8π) perfectly as the other two reflections but the data shows 2 problems which are

1st problem

The data distribution is in the reversed direction of the energy motion direction- because the reflection is done from Neptune to Saturn but the data shows the orbital circumferences of (Saturn, Neptune, Uranus and Pluto) are defined by this reflection which supposes the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune and that's NOT Fact 

This behavior is typical the behavior of the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter-

Means- this behavior is repeated in the two reflections of energy which tells that the behavior depends on a geometrical reason.

2nd problem

The distance is not changed into a period of time as the other reflections but stayed as a distance! How and why?? let's see deeply this data

If the energy is reflected from Saturn to Neptune, Saturn orbital circumference 9010 mkm should be changed into a period of time to be 9010 days and then

9010 days   x 2π    = 2 x 28244 days (28244 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference)

9010 days   x 4π    = 113223 days

9010 days   x 6π    = 169840 days

We see the data gives NO real values- means- this is not the direction of the data creation- Instead – the distance 1433 mkm or the circumference 9010 mkm is still distance and then

1433 mkm   x 2π    = 9010 mkm (Saturn Orbital Circumference)

1433 mkm   x 4π  = 18048  mkm (Uranus Orbital Circumference)

1433 days   x 8π  = 37100 days (Pluto orbital Circumference) (error 2.5%)

And

1433 mkm                       = Mars orbital circumference

We understand that, the data provides a distance (1433 mkm) and not a period of time then we have to ask again why this distance is not changed into a period of time?

We understand that the outer planets have 2 reflections (first reflection from Neptune to Saturn) and (the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter)- also we understand that the solar system needs one reflection only in the outer planets and one reflection only in the inner planets and also we know the outer planets have two reflections because of Neptune negative effect on the solar system- means if Neptune is removed from the solar system the outer planets would have one reflection only – for that- the designer caused the two reflections in the outer planets to be complementary one another – the reflection from Uranus to Jupiter defines the planets orbital periods and the reflection from Neptune to Saturn defines these same planets orbital circumferences

 The designer caused to make the two reflections complementary one another and by that the two reflections can be unified into one reflection and based on that the machine will work by one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets- but how the energy motion produces the distances in place of the periods of time? this question is hard to answer because we don't see deeply how the reflection of energy can define each planet orbital period (or orbital circumference) by using the rates (2π, 4π, 6π) we just discovered the rule but more geometrical analysis is required to see how this rule works

NOTICE

In the third reflection (from Venus to Mars) – let's remember the data

Venus orbital circumference 680 mkm is Changed Into Mars orbital period 687 days

687 days x 2π      = 4331 days (Jupiter orbital period)

687 days x 4π      = 10747 days (Saturn orbital period) x 0.8

687 days x 6π x 2 =  25920 years (The Precession Cycle)

We have asked- why Saturn orbital period is effected by the rate (0.8)?

Let's try to answer – let's see the data 10747 /9800 = 9800/9010 where

10747 days  = Saturn orbital period and 9010 mkm   = Saturn orbital circumference

9800 mkm   = 2 x 4900 mkm (Jupiter Orbital Circumference)  

We know 4900 mkm and 4900 days is the player in the second reflection from Uranus to Jupiter- means- Saturn has effect also in the second reflection for that the second reflection has effect on Saturn data and caused its orbital period to be produced under the effect of the rate (0.8) which is the reflection rate as we will see in the next data 

Group Data No (II)

(1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8        = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day)                   = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

(2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

Discussion

We discuss the data no. (2) and (3) at first

DATA NO. (2)

1.1318 mkm (Jupiter motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.421 mkm

(0.421 mkm = Uranus motion distance in its rotation period)

DATA NO. (3)

0.838 mkm (Saturn motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2 x 1.0725 x 0.3129 mkm

(0.3129 mkm = Neptune motion distance in its rotation period)

MORE DATA

0.5875 mkm (Uranus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.46688 mkm

(0.466884 mkm = Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Neptune motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3736 mkm

(0.3736 mkm = Saturn motion distance in its rotation period) And

0.46688 mkm (Pluto motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 0.3248 mkm

(i)

The rate (0.8) is created by the waves reflection and the planets velocities are defined based on each other by this rate as discussed in the planet velocity definition-  here the data shows the rate (0.8) defines each planet motion distance based on the other planet motion distance (in the same one reflection) –

let's explain that in more details

(1st reflection From Neptune to Saturn) for that

Saturn motion distance per solar day (0.838 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Neptune motion distance in its rotation period 0.3129 million km

Also

Neptune motion distance per solar day (0.46688 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 million km

AND

(2nd reflection From Uranus to Jupiter) for that

Jupiter motion distance per solar day (1.1318 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Uranus motion distance in its rotation period 0.421 million km

Also

Uranus motion distance per solar day (0.5875 million km) by the rate (0.8) defines Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period 0.46688 million km

AND

In the 3rd reflection we will see Mars motion distance per solar day is defined by Venus motion distance per solar day- follows the same rule  

Notice

We note the data No. (2) and (3) show the data is distributed in the reversed direction for the energy motion because the energy is reflected from Neptune to Saturn and from Uranus to Jupiter- But data is distributed in the reversed direction-

In the third reflection we will see the data moves in the same direction with the energy distribution

Also  

In Venus data we will see that it uses the square value (0.8)^2 and we will explain why the rate is used in square value

(ii)

Why is the rate (1.0725) found in the data? because the gravitational wave  moves by speed of light (300000 km/s) in Saturn orbit and in all planets orbits till Venus orbit-

Shortly

the wave velocity was 205.8 km/s through Pluto, Neptune and Uranus orbits BUT

The wave velocity is accelerated in Saturn orbit and its velocity be = speed of light =300000 km/s, for that reason the rate (1.0725) is created because this is (Lorentz length contraction effect rate) and it can be produced only by motion with speed=(99% speed of light =297000 km/s)- shortly- the wave velocity be equal=speed of light = 300000 km/s in Saturn orbit, for that the rate (1.0725) is produced in the orbits of Saturn and Jupiter as the data shows (and also in Venus data we will see it)

(iii)

The previous data shows the planets distances are rated by the rate (0.8) for the planets players in the same wave reflection- but- this picture is not complete yet – because the planets which aren't players in the same reflection shows equal distances also but this distances equality doesn't depend on the rate (0.8) let's give examples

Jupiter motion distance in its rotation period = Neptune motion distance per solar day =0.466884 million km

And

Saturn motion distance in its rotation period 0.3736 mkm x π = Uranus motion distance per solar day 0.5875 mkm x 2

And

The Earth motion distance per solar day = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period = 2.574 million km

This distances equality must be produced also by the waves reflection but the rule is not clear yet- I want to say the effect of the rate (0.8) on the planets distances is part of greater rule explains how this distances equality is produced and the useful result of it –

Please note–I analyze this data in details in 2nd part of this 1st hypothesis explanation-

Now

Let's discuss the data No.(1)

DATA NO. (1)

3.024 mkm (Venus motion distance per solar day) x 0.8 = 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm (The Earth motion distance per solar day)             = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm

2.57 mkm x 0.8 = 2.082 mkm (Mars motion distance per solar day)

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day= Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

Means

3.024 million km x (0.8)^2 x 1.0725 = 2.082 million km where

3.024 mkm  =Venus motion distance per solar day

2.082 mkm  =Mars motion distance per solar day

Notice

2.57 mkm = The Earth motion distance per solar day

2.57 mkm = 1.0725 x 2.4 mkm The moon motion distance per solar day

2.59 mkm = Pluto motion distance in its rotation period

The data tells Mars motion distance per solar day depends on Venus motion distance per solar day – here all distances are defined by the solar day- 

In the third reflection- the wave is reflected from Venus to Mars- here also Venus motion distance per solar day (3.024 mkm) defines Mars motion distance per solar day (2.082 mkm)- but the definition depends on the squared value (0.8)^2 

That shows Venus reflection follows the same rule used by the other reflections – where the sender planet motion distance per solar day defines the receiver planet motion distance

Perfectly the rule is followed BUT Why does Venus use the square value (0.8)^2??

Because of the reflections order – let's explain that

The two reflections in the outer planets are complementary each other and by that they are unified and can be considered as One Unified Reflection in the outer planets

Means- there is one unified reflection in the outer planets and one single reflection in the inner planets and these are two reflections- means – Venus reflection should be considered the second reflection that causes to square the value (0.8)- that explains why Venus uses the squared Value (0.8)^2

Notice

This is a proof for my theory that (one gravitational wave is reflected three times)- means- this wave is reflected before and effected by the rate (0.8) and this same wave is reflected again for that the rate (0.8) be in its squared value  (0.8)^2

The Conclusion

The gravitational waves reflection causes the sender planet motion distance to define the receiver planet motion distance as seen in the data- the definition depends on the rate (0.8) – here we see one rule proves the receiver planet motion depends on the sender planet motion- 

Group Data No (III)

(1)              

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

(2)              

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6

(3)              

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

And

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

Discussion

Data No. (1)

5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747)

568 x 10^24 kg    = Saturn Mass

102 x 10^24 kg    = Neptune Mass

59800 days                    = Neptune orbital period

10747 days                    = Saturn orbital period

In the first reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Neptune to Saturn

This behavior shows second rule– for the planets in the same reflection- we see the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate and this behavior is used by the other two reflections- means- the gravitational wave reflection between two planets cause these two planets masses rate to define their orbital periods rate – let's see the rest data

Data No. (2)

21.8 = (1898 /86.8) = 30589 /1407.6                   (notice1407.6π =4331 error 2%)

1898 x 10^24 kg  = Jupiter Mass

86.8 x 10^24 kg   = Uranus Mass

30589 days                    = Uranus orbital period

4331 days            = Jupiter orbital period

In second reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Uranus to Jupiter

It's the same rule and behavior, the planets masses rates defines their orbital periods

Just Jupiter orbital period 4331 is divided by (π) – no any other change in the rule proves that the rule is a fact and used with the planets of the same reflection

Data No. (3)

(4.87/0.642) ^2 = (7.6)^2 and (7.6)^2 x 224.7 days = 2π^2 x 687 days

4.87 x 10^24 kg   = Venus Mass                         and 0.642 x 10^24 kg= Mars Mass

224.7 days           = Venus orbital period            and 687 days= Mars orbital period

In the third reflection the gravitational wave is reflected from Venus to Mars

Here also we see the planets use the same rule and the same behavior – the masses rate defines the orbital periods rate-But the rate is squared! Why?   

Venus Mass = 7.6 Mars Mass but the data uses the squared rate (7.6)^2 –

We should pay attention for this rate because the other planets used their masses rate but NOT squared value – Why does Venus use the squared value (7.6)^2?

We have solved this question in the distances discussion when Venus used (0.8)^2 and the other planets use (0.8) only- here also is similar to that- let's remember the reason

We agreed that the two wave reflections in the outer planets are complementary one another and by that they are unified together into one unified reflection and by that the outer planets has one unified reflection and the inner planets has one single reflection and these are considered as two reflections and for that Venus reflection is considered the second one in the solar system (and the final one) for that Venus uses the squared Value – where we know the wave reflection causes to square the value

Notice - 5.56 = (568/102) = (59800/10747) = (10/1.8) =9010/1622 where 1.8 deg = Neptune orbital inclination and 10 =4 x 2.5 deg (Saturn orbital inclination) and -9010 mkm= Saturn orbital circumference and 1622 mkm = Neptune Uranus Distance

Notice π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%) – this data is discussed in the next point

The Conclusion The Wave Reflection Causes The Sender And Receiver Planets Masses Rate To Define Their Orbital Periods Rate.

Group Data No (IV)

(1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

(2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 =5.56/2

(3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Discussion

Notice

π^3 = 31 = (5.56)^2 = 4x 4.75 (but between 7.75 and 7.6 the error 2%)

This data shows the rates (5.56) and (7.6) are found based on the value (π^3=31) I try to prove that it's one energy (one value π^3=31) and the different rates as (5.56 and 7.6) are found depending on (this one value π^3=31) by geometrical reasons – that proves it's one energy (one wave) is reflected three times in the solar system – the value (π^3 = 31 =) is very important because all rates depend on it

 The group data shows the planets diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 =31)- let's examine it in following

 Data No. (1)

12104 km (Venus diameter) /6792 km (Mars diameter) = 3.4 deg /1.9 deg = π^0.5

3.4 degrees = Venus Orbital Inclination

1.9 degrees = Mars Orbital Inclination

The data shows the two planets diameters are rated with rate equal their orbital inclination and this rate equal π^0.5

Notice

177.4 degrees (Venus axial tilt) = 1.9 deg (Mars orbital inclination) x 93.4

90+ 3.4 = 93.4 deg

Data No. (2)

142984 km (Jupiter diameter)/51118 km (Uranus diameter) = 2.79 = 5.56

We remember 31 = (5.56)^2

Data No. (3)

378675 km (Saturn Circumference)/49528 km (Neptune diameter) = 7.6

Also we remember 31/4 = 7.75 (and the difference between 7.75 and 7.6 is 2%)

The data shows the diameters rates depend on the value (π^3 = 31 =) as the masses do

Means- the planets masses and diameters are created rated to one another based on this same value (π^3 = 31 =)

I try to prove that – one energy is found behind all this data- the value (π^3 = 31 =) refers to one energy and this energy is effected by different geometrical reasons and that causes this energy (π^3 = 31 =) to show different rates as (5.56) and (7.6)

Shortly – we deal with one energy reflected three times in the solar system and the planets data are defined by the effect of this energy on them

Please note- we can imagine one river of water moves through different cities and each city deals with the river based on its own data- one city has great soil and this uses the river water to plant vegetables and fruits- another city its ground has many holes and caves the river water will cause all these holes to be filled of water and that will create many moors in this city and that will not be useful for it –

We have here the same picture- One energy moves through the solar system and reflected three times in it and this reflection causes changes for the planets data for that the different rates (5.56 and 7.6) are created from this one energy (π^3 = 31 =) by geometrical reasons have effects on it.

Group Data No (V)

(1)               243 mkm    = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days

(2)               17.2 km      = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds

(3)               16.1 km      = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds

Discussion

We discuss data No. (2) and (3) at first

Data No. (2)

17.2 km      = 13.1 km/s x 1.3129 seconds

13.1 km /s   = Jupiter velocity

1.13129      = (5.25/4) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56

17.2 hours = Uranus rotation period

Data No. (3)

16.1 km      = 9.7 km/s x 1.65 seconds

9.7 km /s     = Saturn velocity

1.65            = (5.25/π) but 5.25 x 1.0725 = 5.56

16.1 hours = Neptune rotation period

The data shows each planet rotation period depends on the other planet velocity based on the rate (5.56) where (31=5.56^2)- that shows Uranus rotation period is connected with Jupiter velocity and Neptune rotation period is connected with Saturn velocity proves that a deep connection is found between each two planets as a result for the wave reflection between them 

Data No. (1)

243 mkm    = 2.082 mkm x 116.7 days

243 days     = Venus rotation period

2.082 mkm =Mars motion distance per solar day  and 116.75 days = Venus day period 

We see also here – Venus rotation period is related to Mars velocity- and this similar to the other planets behavior as we have discussed before 

Notice

Venus (35 km/s) moves in 10747 seconds a distance = 378675 km

Where

378675 km = Saturn circumference

10747 days = Saturn orbital period 

We know that- No direct reflection is found between Venus and Saturn- but the data shows deep interaction is found between them

I want to say

I provide different data to prove my hypothesis tells (The gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and the waves are reflected three times in the solar system and the wave reflection causes to square the wave velocity) for that I put different data trying to prove this hypothesis

But- the real design is much complex than this small hypothesis- because this hypothesis refers to one rule found in the design but the design is consisted of hundreds of rules and by that I provide very narrow vision for the whole truth-

Imagine we examine the artery connected between the human liver and his heart- it's one artery – it's fact and real piece of the human body but it's just one artery of many others- I want to say- the real vision of the solar system is so wide than this one I provide here- that's why the rules are not complete- but I provide strong data can prove my hypothesis and can show a piece of truth about the solar system real design.     

Group Data No (VI)

(1)              

177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2

(2)

97.8 degrees   = 31 x 3.1 degrees

(3)

28.3 degrees (Neptune axial tilt) =  26.7 degrees (Saturn axial tilt) x 1.0725

Discussion

Data No. (1)

177.4 degrees = 115.2 degrees x π/2

177.4 degrees = Venus Axial Tilt

 25.2 degrees   = Mars Axial Tilt                BUT 25.2 +90 = 115.2 degrees

Please note

(12104 km Venus diameter / 6792 km Mars diameter) = 3.4/1.9 = π^0.5

(3.4 deg and 1.9 deg are the orbital inclinations of Venus and Mars respectively)

And

(177.4 deg Venus axial tilt / 115.2 degrees) = π/2

We see clearly the data depend on the value (π^3) and different geometrical reasons have effect on this value to produce these rates (π^0.5 and π/2)

Data No. (2)

97.8 degrees   = 31 x 3.1 degrees

97.8 degrees   = Venus Axial Tilt

3.1 degrees     = Mars Axial Tilt

The data still depends on this same value (π^3= 31)

Group Data No (VII)

The distance 1433 million km

This distance should prove the energy is transported and the waves are reflected in the solar system because this distance is used frequently in the solar system and no explanation for such using better than the reflection of energy – let’s see its data

1433 million km            = Mars Orbital Circumference

1433 million km            = Saturn Orbital Distance

1433 million km            = Uranus Saturn Distance

2 x 1433 million km      = Uranus Orbital Distance

π x 1433 million km      = Neptune Orbital Distance

(π+1) x 1433 million km         = Pluto Orbital Distance

1410 million km            = Pluto Neptune Distance  (with 1433 mkm error 1.7%)

Also

1433 days =  2π x 224.7 days (Venus Orbital Period)

Logically there's a geometrical reason to cause all these distances to be equal and rated to each other based on this same root (1433)- and the wave reflection can be this geometrical reason by which this data is created.  

The Explanation Of The Wave Reflection Effect On The Solar System Design

The gravitational waves reflection has great effect on the solar system design- let's refer to this effect in following

The Planets Distribution

The three outer planets (Pluto- Neptune- Uranus) have great orbits- why?

Because the gravitational waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s in these orbits and the planets motions energies are stored in these orbits as waves move by this velocity 205.8 km/s – means – great and massive motion energy is stored in these orbit where the waves move by 205.8 km/s that needed great areas to store so massive amount of energy

BUT

The Waves Velocity Is Accelerated In Saturn Orbit 

This is the important point- because- the interaction between the outer planets caused to reflect the wave in Saturn orbit firstly and this reflection causes to square the velocity and then the velocity is squared and be equal the speed of light – means- the gravitational waves move by speed of light starting from Saturn orbit and continues with this speed till Venus and the other inner planets-

This is very important picture because

The low velocity 205.8 km/s needed great areas that causes the orbits or Pluto, Neptune and Uranus to be so great areas – BUT

The high speed motion (speed of light) doesn't need great areas – that's why the planets orbits from Saturn to Mercury are small orbits and the inner has very small orbits because the energy doesn't depend on the number of waves move by velocity 205.8 km/s but the energy depends on the motion by speed of light by that the energy of 1461 waves move by 205.8 km/s be equal the energy of one wave moves by speed of light – that causes the orbits to be small orbits – and that explains the distribution of the planets from the sun to Pluto.    

And for that

When the massive reflected energy reached to Venus- it doesn't destroy the small inner planets and their orbits because the energy is used immediately to produce the sun rays means no need for storing the energy and for that no places for the energy storing instead the energy is used immediately- I try to show that- the planets distribution depends on the gravitational waves velocity in different orbits and by that the planets create their orbits in harmony with the moving energy    

The Planets Masses Distribution

The outer planets have great masses but the inner planets have very small masses- why? because the rates of masses enable to accelerate the wave velocity in Saturn orbit-this idea is explained clearly in (Mass definition) in my paper definitions

The mass is used as a rate of time and the rates between the great and small masses aim to create the required rates of time and by these rates of time the wave velocity is accelerated

Thanks

Please read my paper

The Sun Can NOT Be Created Before The Planets Creation

or

or

or

And

A Great Gap Between The Physics Book And The Solar System Facts

or

And

The Gravitational waves reflection proves the gravitational waves are produced by the planets motions energies and not by the gravitational field

or

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  

Curriculum Vitae                 https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail                            mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com

                                      gergesgerges@yandex.ru                  

ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook                       https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 

Researcherid                  https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket                                                                    https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box                                https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications        http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare                            https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[virtualdetectiveduck]

Omg wait no I’ve given them my email they’re going to find my tumblr uh oh 💀

[pallases]

anyway if anyone happens to be wondering leigh you’ve been spam rbing for quite some time now haha do you have an exam or smth tmrw the answer is yes ❤️

[theresa-of-liechtenstein]

“maybe you should have transferred after your sophomore year” that is quite literally the devil talking

[mammalsofaction]

My toxic trait is I believe Heinz was a punk rock in his early twenties in community college, doing scene, and he met Charlene at a rave

[sonacollege]

Sona College of Technology provides 100% Scholarship for top cut-off students for Tamailnadu Engineering Admissions - 2023, They offer 2 crore worth scholarships for those who are 195 and Above cut off courses like Computer Science Engineering - 3, Artificial Engineering and Machine Learning - 1, Computer Science and Design - 1, Information Technology - 2, Artificial Intelligence and Data Science - 2, Electrical communication engineering - 3, 190 and Above cut off Civil Engineering - 1, Electrical and Electronics Engineering - 2, Mechanical Engineering - 2, Biomedical Engineering - 1, Fashion Technology - 1, Mechatronics Engineering - 1

[citrusitonit]

woah.... to be an astronaut, or a pilot? i sometimes forget there is more than the path laid out for me. like im not limited to just being an architect or an artist i could litrlly choose 2 study as an astronaut if i wanted to or maybe even a chemical engineer if i put my mind on it

[drysauce]

how do i say wyjebałem się na ostatniej prostej in english

[indizombie]

Pre-Matric scholarships have also been delayed. Scholarships for informal workers’ children have ceased as have the Maulana Azad National Fellowships which were fellowships for Muslim students. The government itself admitted in the Assembly that 1,010 Muslim girls had dropped out of high school and college as a result of the tensions created around the hijab issue. Universities with a proven track record of good education, such as the University Visvesvaraya College of Engineering (UVCE) has been expected to generate its own revenue and the institution is currently in a dire state. Similarly, Kannada University is on the verge of closure due to lack of funds.

Bahutva Karnataka, civil rights group

[starburns]

so many barriers between a girl and her watching re animator