#deferred annuity

[asjinsurance]

Maximizing Retirement Income: Comparing Fixed, Variable, and Indexed Annuities

[nationallawreview]

The Rise of Annuities - A Riddle Wrapped in a Mystery Inside an Enigma? [Podcast]

“A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.” That’s Winston Churchill describing Russia in 1939. The words puzzle and paradox have long been associated with annuities, marking them as one of the most difficult financial products to demystify. Recently, there has been a significant increase in annuity sales, which has added to the enigma. Why are they suddenly becoming so popular? Estate…

[investment-annuities]

Am I Overpaying For My Car Insurance?

Determining whether you're overpaying for car insurance can be a tricky question, but it's crucial to ensure you're getting the best deal possible. Many factors can influence your car insurance rates, from your driving record to the type of vehicle you drive. By understanding these factors and comparing rates, you can figure out if you're spending too much on your car insurance.

Review Your Current Policy

Start by thoroughly reviewing your current car insurance policy. Check what types of coverage you have — including liability, collision and comprehensive — and the limits for each. It's essential to make sure you're not underinsured, but also that you're not paying for more coverage than you need. For example, if you're driving an older car that's decreased significantly in value, full collision coverage may no longer be cost-effective.

Compare Insurance Quotes

The most effective way to determine if you are overpaying is to shop around and compare car insurance. Rates can vary significantly between providers, even for the same coverage. Use online tools to get car insurance quotes from several insurers based on your specific situation. Be sure to input the same details for each quote to make an accurate comparison.

When comparing car insurance, also consider the customer service and claim response times of the insurers. Cheaper doesn't always mean better if it comes at the cost of timely and supportive service in the event of an accident.

In conclusion, to determine if you're overpaying for car insurance, review your current policy details, ensure the coverage levels are appropriate for your needs and regularly compare car insurance quotes from various providers. By taking these steps, you can manage your insurance costs effectively and ensure you're getting the best possible deal.

Read a similar article about personal finance for women here at this page.

[wonder-worker]

why did the wydevilles and richard III hate each other that much during edward iv's reign?

Hi! To get straight to the point – there is no evidence of hostility between the Woodvilles and Richard of Gloucester before 1483. On the contrary, their relationship during Edward IV’s reign seems to have been cordial and mutually cooperative. Elizabeth made Richard steward of some of her estates in 1469, increased his fee in 1473, and seems to have backed him against Clarence over the Warwick inheritance. Both of them clearly benefitted by Clarence’s downfall. Richard supported her sites of patronage, like Queen’s College, and he included her among those to ask prayers for when founding two new colleges at his northern homes, Bernard Castle and Middleham, in 1478 (we shouldn't see this as a mere formality, as his own mother was not included in the list). He also seems to have been on amicable terms with Elizabeth’s family: in 1481 her eldest son and her brother Anthony served under his command in Scotland; he raised Edward Woodville to a banneret; and in late March 1483 (just a few weeks before Edward IV’s death), Anthony had trusted Richard enough to nominate him as an arbiter in one of his disputes. Richard was also close to Katherine Haute, wife of Elizabeth’s cousin James, giving her a generous annuity from his estates. Historians have theorized she was his mistress as she shared the same name as his illegitimate daughter Katherine, but whatever the specifics of their dynamic, it does indicate closeness.  Also, as Rosemary Horrox points out in Richard III: A Study of Service, “the local interests of the duke and the Woodvilles coincided at several points, notably in Wales and East Anglia but also (briefly) in Richmondshire, where the queen’s mother, the dowager duchess of Bedford, held one third of the honour until 1472. Had the two interests been hostile, one would expect some evidence of local friction, but there is none”. Rather, Elizabeth and Richard engaged in independent land transactions with each other – for example, she bought the highly lucrative FitzLewis manors from him.

So while we don't know what they personally felt about each other, we do know that 1) there is no evidence at all of hostility on either side, and 2) the evidence we do have is one of mutual cooperation.

This is important to keep in mind when talking about the events in 1483. Most modern historians (Charles Ross, AJ Pollard, etc) have blamed Edward IV for his son’s deposition by claiming that he failed to reconcile the Woodvilles and Richard during his life, paving the way for tensions to erupt between their so-called factions after his death. Twisted leap of logic aside, this is ridiculously unfair: Edward cannot be blamed for “failing” to remedy tensions which literally did not exist during his life. He was not a prophet; he could not control events from the grave. There is no need to blame him for Richard’s shocking betrayal that we already know contemporaries were not able to foresee. During his life, Edward would have had every reason to believe that his wife and his brother would work together during his son’s minority. And he had good reason to believe this: while conflict between the Woodvilles and Richard did erupt in 1483, it was not inevitable and should not be viewed as such. Rather, in the aftermath of Edward’s death, Elizabeth Woodville seems to have expected to work with Richard. She took the king’s place in listening to his council, and Croyland reports that Richard was sending her deferring letters “[promising] to come and offer submission, fealty, and all that was due from him to his lord and king, Edward V, the first-born son of his brother the dead king and the queen”. Croyland also writes that the new king, Edward V, sent Anthony Woodville and Richard Gray, to “submit the conduct of everything to the will and discretion of his uncle the Duke of Gloucester”. We know that Edward V was planning on having an immediate coronation thanks to a letter he wrote to the burgesses of King’s Lynn, and according to Mancini, who quotes the young king, “as for the government of the kingdom, he had complete confidence in the peers of the realm and the queen [Elizabeth].” Considering what Croyland wrote above, the “peers of the realm” would have surely included his uncle Richard. Indeed, Anthony and Richard Gray trusted Richard enough to walk blindly into a trap; it’s difficult to understand how this was possible or why they weren’t better prepared if they truly disliked Richard (or, for that matter, if they had tried to exclude him from power). It’s possible - imo, very likely - that the Woodvilles would have been the most influential and dominant after Edward V’s coronation; that does seem to have been the view of contemporaries. But since the coronation never took place, and since Elizabeth and her family clearly wanted and expected to work with the council and peers of the realm – including (arguably especially) Richard – it’s not possible to read them as anything other than cooperative.  At the very least, based on what we know right now.

I don’t want this post to get too speculatory, because it’s not like we have video recordings of 1483 to know exactly what went down, but my basic point is that going by the information we have, it was entirely plausible for Richard and “the Queen’s kin” (which is what "the Woodvilles" were actually known as to contemporaries, both administratively and in chronicles) to work together. They had done so during Edward IV’s life, and the impression I get is that Eizabeth at least seems to have expected it to continue after his death. Presumably, Anthony and Richard Gray did as well.

I think there are two reasons most chroniclers and historians are so willing to believe the Woodvilles and Richard were "rivals":

One is hindsight: their explosive conflict in 1483 is retrospectively read backwards and applied to Edward IV’s reign as a whole despite the abundance of evidence (see: Anthony trusting Richard to arbitrate a dispute mere weeks earlier) that proves otherwise.

Historically speaking, however, the idea of a rivalry primarily stems from Ricardian propaganda that sought to vilify Elizabeth Woodville, reviving and doubling down on Warwick's earlier propaganda against her. She was framed as a disruptive queen and transgressive woman with an “ignoble” social-climbing family who dominated the government and "controlled" the king. His propaganda at that time also aimed to cast "the Woodvilles as the aggressors and [Richard] as the victim of circumstance", as Horrox has pointed out. Hence why you have Mancini claiming that Richard and Elizabeth hated each other and that her "jealousy" kept him out of court, or why Thomas More claimed that “the Queene and the Lordes of her bloode whiche highlye maligned the kynges kinred (as women commonly not of malice but of nature hate them whom their husbands love)’. This, as we should know by now, is nonsense. The conflict between Richard and the Woodvilles (most probably) originated in 1483 because of the existence of an unexpected minority and because of his actions against them, not by non-existent simmering tensions during Edward IV's reign.

Hope this helps!

*Thomas Gray Marquis of Dorset's alleged boast that "we are so important that even without the king's uncle we can make and enforce these decisions", as quoted by Mancini, is often taken as proof that the Woodvilles wanted ultimate dominance during Edward V's minority. However, there are ... a great many problems with this interpretation. One, we don't know if Dorset actually said something like this: after all, Croyland never claims any such thing in his own chronicle. Additionally, while it was (and is) popularly assumed that Elizabeth and Dorset wished to exclude Richard because they started the council without him, this makes no sense in context: Anthony Woodville, Richard Gray and the young King himself were also not present at that time. Does it make any sense at all to assume that the council was insulting these three figures (again, including the actual King) by convening before they arrived in London? Then why is it automatically assumed that it was meant to be an insult to Richard? Why are more pragmatic reasons never considered? After all, there was a 20+ day gap between Edward IV's death and Richard's arrival in London - governance of the entire country couldn't exactly be put on pause until then. Long story short, it's possible Mancini could misunderstood Dorset's statement/intent or - more likely - that he was unknowingly reflecting Ricardian propaganda specifically aimed to present Dorset in a bad light (as an aggressor who tried to exclude Richard, with Richard merely claiming his "rightful" place). And either way, even if he did say something along those lines, Dorset was not the senior or most influential member of the family: that was Elizabeth Woodville and his uncle Anthony. So Dorset's words - if he actually said something like that - can hardly be taken as evidence that his entire family felt the same, especially since Anthony & Dorset's own brother Richard Gray clearly went to dine with Richard in peace. Especially since we know Thomas obeyed his mother: he went with her into sanctuary, and he apparently tried to return to England from exile as she asked him to after she made a deal with Richard.

**The Woodvilles and Hastings do seem to have been at odds. This didn't stop them from working together during Edward's reign (we have plenty examples of them cooperating, there is no evidence of a divide between them in Edward IV's charters as there was for the Woodvilles & Nevilles in the 1460s, Hastings praised Elizabeth in 1480 and clearly recognized her superior influence with Edward IV, etc), but - unlike the case with Richard - there is genuine evidence of hostility between them. We don't know if this would have mattered as much if Edward V was an adult, or if he'd already been present at London at the time of Edward IV's death. But either way, we shouldn't exaggerate this or act as though it meant Edward V was doomed. It was very normal for different parties/families to have conflicts during minorities; it had happened to pretty much all minor kings prior to 1483, it had never stopped them from working together before, and it sure as hell had never led to usurpation. Moreover, if the Woodvilles and Richard had been able to work together, animosity between the Woodvilles and Hastings would not have mattered. There are indications that cooperation between them was entirely possible: Horrox has observed that the commissions agreed upon by the first council after Edward's death tried to balance out their interests. Lastly, we ... probably shouldn't overexaggerate Hastings' position after Edward IV's death, imo. He was very important and influential, yes, but he was also not a member of the immediate royal family; it's a pretty massive stretch to automatically assume he would have been as relevant as Elizabeth, the Woodvilles, or Richard during Edward V's minority. This can be supported by evidence: after Edward IV's death, his council gathered around Elizabeth, not Hastings; Richard sent messages promising to arrive and swear fealty to her, not Hastings; the final authority when it came to the young king rested with her, not Hastings. Moreover, once Richard and Buckingham came to power, Croyland explicitly states that Hastings wanted to "serve" them and "earn their favor". In other words, he was not leading the council himself. His reaction to Richard & Buckingham and Elizabeth & the Woodvilles may have been the opposite, but either way, the impression I get of Hastings' position in both scenarios seems to have been exactly the same: he was important and influential, but he was not the one in charge. Of course, this is just my personal interpretation - my main point is simply that while the Woodvilles and Hastings may have had problems, at the very least, there is no reason at all to assume this would have affected Edward V's position as King. His deposition was entirely unexpected, and very much the result of Richard's own unprecedented decisions.

[nothingunrealistic]

KINGS COUNTY SUPREME COURT

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF AUTOMATIC ORDERS (D.R.L. 236) Rev. 8/19 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THESE ORDERS MAY BE DEEMED A CONTEMPT OF COURT

PURSUANT TO the Uniform Rules of the Trial Courts, and DOMESTIC RELATIONS LAW § 236, Part B, Section 2, both you and your spouse (the parties) are bound by the following AUTOMATIC ORDERS, which have been entered against you and your spouse in your divorce action pursuant to 22 NYCRR §202.16(a), and which shall remain in full force and effect during the pendency of the action unless terminated, modified or amended by further order of the court or upon written agreement between the parties:

(1) ORDERED: Neither party shall transfer, encumber, assign, remove, withdraw or in any way dispose of, without the consent of the other party in writing, or by order of the court, any property (including, but not limited to, real estate, personal property, cash accounts, stocks, mutual funds, bank accounts, cars and boats) individually or jointly held by the parties, except in the usual course of business, for customary and usual household expenses or for reasonable attorney’s fees in connection with this action.

(2) ORDERED: Neither party shall transfer, encumber, assign, remove, withdraw or in any way dispose of any tax deferred funds, stocks or other assets held in any individual retirement accounts, 401K accounts, profit sharing plans, Keogh accounts, or any other pension or retirement account, and the parties shall further refrain from applying for or requesting the payment of retirement benefits [or] annuity payments of any kind, without the consent of the other party […] of the court; except that any party who […] thereunder […]

[dietplanssite]

Best Annuity Companies of 2024 • Benzinga

Looking for the best annuities? Get started with Leverage Planning to compare quotes from top annuity providers. Annuities play a crucial role in retirement planning because they can provide a consistent and guaranteed income stream. They also offer potential tax advantages, as the funds within the annuity can grow tax-deferred until withdrawal, allowing for more efficient growth over time. When…

[ebelal56-blog]

Are You Making a Costly Mistake with Your Retirement Savings?

Learn about the costly mistake you may be making with your retirement savings. Find out how financial education, charitable planning, donor advised funds, dividend investing, and annuity reviews can help secure your future. So, let’s dive into a topic that can feel a little murky at first but is really important for anyone thinking about their financial future: variable annuities. Now, I know what you might be thinking. “What even is a variable annuity?” It sounds complicated, right? But stick with me, because by the end of this, you’ll have a solid understanding of what it is and if it could be a good fit for you. At its core, a variable annuity is an insurance contract that allows you to invest your money in a variety of options, usually mutual funds. This means you have the chance to grow your investment, but here’s the catch: the value of your annuity can go up or down based on how those investments perform. Unlike fixed annuities, where you get a guaranteed return, variable annuities are all about the market. So, if the market booms, your annuity could grow significantly. But if it tanks, you could see your investment shrink. It’s like a roller coaster ride—thrilling, but also a little scary! Now, let’s break it down into two main phases. First, there’s the accumulation phase. This is where you’re putting money into the annuity, and your investment grows tax-deferred. That means you don’t pay taxes on those gains until you withdraw the money. This can be a huge advantage, especially if you’re looking to maximize your investment over time. Think of it as a way to let your money work harder for you without the taxman breathing down your neck. Then, we move into the payout phase. This is when you start receiving regular payments from your annuity. You can set it up to receive payments for a specific period or even for the rest of your life. Imagine knowing you have a guaranteed income stream in retirement, regardless of what happens in the market. That’s a comforting thought, isn’t it? So, who should consider investing in a variable annuity? Well, if you’re a long-term investor, someone who’s planning for retirement and can afford to keep your money invested for a while, this could be a good option for you. It’s also great for tax-conscious investors looking for growth beyond traditional retirement accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs. And if you want that peace of mind of having a guaranteed income in retirement, variable annuities can offer that through optional riders.

[smarterfeds1]

Navigating Your Federal Law Enforcement Career: A Guide to Financial Security | Smarter Feds

As a dedicated federal law enforcement officer, you've committed yourself to serving and protecting our nation. While your primary focus is on public safety, it's equally important to secure your own financial future. This guide will help you understand key financial considerations, including retirement planning, healthcare benefits, and legal protections.

Understanding Your Retirement Benefits

The Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) is a comprehensive retirement plan designed specifically for federal employees. It offers a three-pronged approach to retirement savings:

Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) Offset: A traditional pension plan that provides a monthly annuity upon retirement.

Federal Employees' Retirement System (FERS) Pension: A modern defined benefit plan with features like Social Security integration and cost-of-living adjustments.

Thrift Savings Plan (TSP): A tax-deferred savings plan similar to a 401(k) that allows you to invest in various funds.

Healthcare Benefits After Retirement

The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB) offers a wide range of health insurance plans to federal employees and retirees. To ensure continued coverage after retirement, you'll need to carefully consider your options and understand the associated costs, especially FEHB premiums after retirement.

Legal Protections for Federal Law Enforcement Officers

The Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association (FLEOA) is a powerful advocate for federal law enforcement officers. They work to protect your rights and benefits, including:

Collective Bargaining: Negotiating for better pay, benefits, and working conditions.

Legal Representation: Providing legal assistance and representation in disciplinary actions and other legal matters.

Lobbying Efforts: Advocating for legislation that supports law enforcement officers.

Financial Planning Tips for Federal Law Enforcement Officers

Consult with a Financial Advisor: A qualified financial advisor can help you create a personalized financial plan tailored to your specific needs and goals.

Maximize Your Retirement Contributions: Contribute as much as possible to your TSP to maximize your retirement savings.

Understand Your FEHB Options: Research your FEHB options and choose a plan that best suits your needs and budget.

Protect Your Income: Consider disability insurance to protect your income in case of injury or illness.

Plan for Your Future: Set long-term financial goals and create a strategy to achieve them.

By  Smarter Feds taking proactive steps to plan for your financial future, you can enjoy a secure and comfortable retirement. Remember, your dedication to public service deserves to be rewarded with financial security.

[insuradvisor]

Why Choose an Annuity Plan for Your Future?

Post-Retirement Stability: For individuals stepping into retirement, an annuity plan guarantees a regular income, mitigating financial worries during the later stages of life.

Diverse Options: With immediate and deferred annuity options, individuals can tailor their plans to suit their financial goals and timelines.

Support for Dependents: Many annuity plans come with provisions to ensure that dependents receive financial support, offering peace of mind to policyholders.

Tax Benefits: Certain annuity plans offer tax-saving benefits, making them a smart financial choice for individuals looking to optimize their savings.

How SMC Insurance Simplifies "Annuity Plan" Choices

SMC Insurance’s expert guidance on "annuity plan" options helps individuals make informed decisions tailored to their unique needs. From explaining the intricacies of different annuity types to providing insights into the best investment strategies, SMC ensures a smooth journey toward financial security.

With SMC’s resources, you can take charge of your retirement planning and secure a future free from financial stress.

[ashok-kumars-world]

Plan your retirement early with LIC's New Jeevan Shanti which offers you deferred annuity upto 05 years. For more information, contact us @ 09459219212

एलआईसी की न्यू जीवन शांति के साथ अपनी सेवानिवृत्ति की योजना जल्दी बनाएं जो आपको 05 साल तक की विलंबित वार्षिकी प्रदान करती है। अधिक जानकारी के लिए, संपर्क करें ! 08219658835

[investment-annuities]

Are Single Premium Deferred Annuities a Good Investment?

Annuities are contracts that allow you to receive payments in exchange for premium payments. Many individuals use annuities to supplement other retirement plans and create another source of income. There are many types of annuities available.

One example is a single premium deferred annuity (SPDA). As the name suggests, these annuities require a single lump-sum premium. The premium amount will experience tax-deferred growth during the accumulation phase. Then, at the date specified when purchasing the annuity, the total premium and interest will become regular payments.

It's not hard to see how traditional multi-premium annuities are beneficial. But are SPDAs a good investment?

Reasons to Purchase an SPDA

There are many reasons why one might consider investing in an SPDA. Beyond standard retirement planning, many people with large sums of money they want to protect will get an SPDA. Single premium deferred annuity rates are typically higher than your average high-yield savings account.

Therefore, you can put your money to better use than having it sit in a savings account. You'll earn more tax-deferred interest.

More importantly, it's a way to protect your money from yourself and others. When you purchase an annuity, you're locking the money away. While not FDIC-insured, your contract to buy an annuity is usually with an insurance company. Therefore, your money is safe.

It's a fantastic way to set money aside for retirement and ensure you don't spend it. You'll often see people who come into large sums of cash using SPDAs to grow their wealth while safeguarding it long-term.

Next to taking advantage of better single premium deferred annuity rates, another notable benefit is getting guaranteed payments later. Furthermore, the interest earned is tax-deferred.

If you're worried about risks, you can invest in an indexed SPDA. They come with downside protection, providing growth without considerable risks.

Are SPDAs good investments? If you have money you want to protect and put aside for retirement, they're a fine investment. They offer a fantastic way to park your assets and plan for the future.

Read a similar article about best annuity investments here at this page.

[nationallawreview]

IRS Announces 2025 Retirement Plan Limits

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has announced the following dollar limits applicable to tax-qualified plans for 2025: The limit on the maximum amount of elective contributions that a person may make to a 401(k) plan, a 403(b) tax-sheltered annuity, or a 457(b) eligible deferred compensation plan increased from $23,000 to $23,500. The limit on “catch-up contributions” to a 401(k) plan, a…

[ebelal56-blog]

বাং��াদেশ নিয়ে উচ্ছ্বাস প্রকাশ করে যা বললেন বিদেশি তরুণী | Foreign Women ...

Learn about the costly mistake you may be making with your retirement savings. Find out how financial education, charitable planning, donor advised funds, dividend investing, and annuity reviews can help secure your future. So, let’s dive into a topic that can feel a little murky at first but is really important for anyone thinking about their financial future: variable annuities. Now, I know what you might be thinking. “What even is a variable annuity?” It sounds complicated, right? But stick with me, because by the end of this, you’ll have a solid understanding of what it is and if it could be a good fit for you. At its core, a variable annuity is an insurance contract that allows you to invest your money in a variety of options, usually mutual funds. This means you have the chance to grow your investment, but here’s the catch: the value of your annuity can go up or down based on how those investments perform. Unlike fixed annuities, where you get a guaranteed return, variable annuities are all about the market. So, if the market booms, your annuity could grow significantly. But if it tanks, you could see your investment shrink. It’s like a roller coaster ride—thrilling, but also a little scary! Now, let’s break it down into two main phases. First, there’s the accumulation phase. This is where you’re putting money into the annuity, and your investment grows tax-deferred. That means you don’t pay taxes on those gains until you withdraw the money. This can be a huge advantage, especially if you’re looking to maximize your investment over time. Think of it as a way to let your money work harder for you without the taxman breathing down your neck. Then, we move into the payout phase. This is when you start receiving regular payments from your annuity. You can set it up to receive payments for a specific period or even for the rest of your life. Imagine knowing you have a guaranteed income stream in retirement, regardless of what happens in the market. That’s a comforting thought, isn’t it? So, who should consider investing in a variable annuity? Well, if you’re a long-term investor, someone who’s planning for retirement and can afford to keep your money invested for a while, this could be a good option for you. It’s also great for tax-conscious investors looking for growth beyond traditional retirement accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs. And if you want that peace of mind of having a guaranteed income in retirement, variable annuities can offer that through optional riders. But let’s not sugarcoat it—there are some things to consider before jumping in. Variable annuities often come with high fees. We’re talking management fees, mortality and expense charges, and fees for those optional riders. It can get a bit pricey, so you’ll want to do your homework. Plus, these products can be complex. It’s essential to read the fine print and understand what you’re getting into. And here’s another thing: if you decide to withdraw your money early, you might face surrender charges. So, it’s crucial to think about your liquidity needs before committing. Remember, the value of your investment hinges on market performance, so there’s a risk involved—you could end up losing money. In the end, variable annuities can be a great fit for individuals who have maxed out contributions to other retirement accounts, are looking for additional tax-advantaged growth, and want a mix of market-based returns with some guaranteed income. But, and this is a big but, it’s vital to consult with a financial advisor to see if this aligns with your overall financial plan. So, there you have it! Variable annuities in a nutshell. They can be a powerful tool in your financial toolbox, but like any investment, they come with their own set of risks and rewards. Take your time, do your research, and make informed decisions. Your future self will thank you!

[thenewpathfinder2024-2034]

let's look at the retirement expenses

Housing

Real Estate Taxes

Electric

Garbage

Water

Natural Gas

Internet

Cell Phone

Security System

Home Improvements

Furniture

Yard Maintenance

Loans & Liabilities

House Mortgage

Auto Loan

Boat Loan

Credit Card

RV / Camping Trailer

Food & Personal Care

Groceries

Restaurants

Spending Cash

Haircuts 

Dry Cleaning

Gym Membership

Clothes and Shoes

Chiropractor

Insurance & Medical

Auto Insurance

Home Owners Insurance

Health Insurance

Dental Insurance

Life Insurance

Long Term Care Insurance

Medicare Supplemental Insurance

Vision & Eyecare

Medications

Vehicles & Transportation

Annual Tuneup

Fuel

Oil Change

Maintenance

Tires

Repairs

Memberships

License Renewal

Public Transportation

Travel & Entertainment

Vacations

Birthdays

Christmas

Amazon Prime

Hobbies & Lessons

Magazines and Newspapers

Software Subscriptions

Netflix

Movies 

Giving & Miscellaneous

Tithes & Offerings

Missions

Charitable donations

Financial Adviser

Tax Preparation

Remember To Include Taxes include both state and federal taxes in your retirement spending planning.

There are a few ways to reduce the amount of taxes you'll owe in retirement. One is to consider doing ROTH contributions and conversions as you prepare for retirement. Another is to carefully plan your withdrawals from those accounts so that you don't end up in a higher than necessary tax bracket.

Essential vs Discretionary 

-Essential expenses are those that you need to live, such as food, shelter, and clothing.

-Discretionary expenses are those that you can live without, such as entertainment and vacations.

The Goal Of Retirement

The goal of retirement is cash flow. It's all about making sure you have enough income to cover your expenses. You can start to project how much income you'll have in retirement and then compare your guaranteed income to your costs. Some of the most common sources of income in retirement are social security benefits , pensions, annuities, or rental income.

The Gap

Normally, your income sources will not cover all of your expenses in retirement. This is where your retirement savings come into play. You will likely need to supplement your income with withdrawals from a 401k, IRA, or other retirement accounts.

After entering all of your income and expenses into the calculator let's say you discover that you will have $50,000 dollars of income every year But your expenses are $90,000 per year. The gap in this scenario is $40,000. It is the difference between how much income you have compared to how much you plan to spend.

Have You Saved Enough To Cover The Gap?

The general rule of thumb is that you will take the gap number and multiply it by 25. This is based on the 4% rule that says you can safely withdraw up to four percent of your retirement savings each year without depleting your account. In the example above, you would need one million dollars saved to cover the forty thousand dollar gap.

Asset Allocation

If you are going to use the 4% rule you will want to make sure you have the correct asset allocation of your investments. The goal is to have a mix of stocks and bonds that will give you the best chance to not only cover your expenses but also keep up with inflation.

The research on the 4% rule found that a 60/40 mix of stocks and bonds is the sweet spot for most investors. This means that if you have a one million dollar portfolio, $600,000 would be in stocks and $400,000 would be in bonds.

Even though this combination has been shown to work, it does not factor in your risk tolerance and it's vital to note that past success is no indicator of future performance.

Withdrawal Order

How you choose to take money out of your different accounts could play a role in how long your money will last in retirement. The conventional wisdom is to withdraw from taxable accounts first and then move to tax-deferred accounts like a 401k or traditional IRA and save your tax-free accounts to last.

However, this is not always the best strategy because how much taxable income you have can impact other things such as how much you will pay for health insurance in the years leading up to age 65 or how much of your social security will be taxable.

 Experiment with different withdrawal strategies to figure out what would be the best approach for you.