#dailyshow

[pennsyltuckyheathen]

Ma’am, we will turn this plane right around! #dailyshow #MTG

Margarine Tater-Greens pitches a hissy on a flight because of comments and insults from fellow passengers.

Here's a solution. Strap her to one of the wings...😜 Lol

[antidrumpfs]

The Marjorie Taylor Greene Insults You Didn't Hear on 60 Minutes | The Daily Show

Desi Lydic crashed MTG's 60 Minutes interview to share some more insults from people around the world. 

[whenweallvote]

After seven incredible seasons as the host of The Daily Show, Trevor Noah signed off for the final time last night — Thursday, December 8. Thank you for using your voice to build longer tables, exposing the world to voices that you knew we needed to hear, and — of course — thank you for lifting up our work at When We All Vote, Trevor. 𝘞𝘦'𝘭𝘭 𝘮𝘪��𝘴 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘰𝘯 𝘛𝘩𝘶𝘳𝘴𝘥𝘢𝘺 𝘯𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘴.

[1critfailnews]

FBI Sacramento as DHU Tony Blair gets punked for promoting Britney Spears.

( Nobody dated Britney Spears )

[djducats]

Trevor noah Busta Rhymes at the Grammy 🖤🖤

[stevensaus]

Going Down Some Rabbit Holes With Natural Experiments, Mind Viruses, And Simulated Universes.

Everything is awful, so let's go down the philosophical rabbit hole and take another look at philosophical zombies, mind viruses, testable hypotheses, and how that relates to the idea that the universe is a simulation. (You really kind of want to read this one on the blog for the links, embedded videos, and such.) https://ideatrash.net/2023/03/going-down-some-rabbit-holes-with-natural-experiments-mind-viruses-and-simulated-universes.html Featured Image by Yassay from Pixabay Read the full article

[biancarogers]

Jon Stewart Deconstructs Trump’s "Victimless" $450 Million Fraud | The Daily Show 🤔📺👀 https://applevideos.co.uk/mac-studio/jon-stewart-deconstructs-trumps-victimless-450-million-fraud-the-daily-show

[historystickstoyourfeet]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Daily Show (@thedailyshow)

Wear the right fucking coat... actually the right fucking brown shirt

[ichwillnichtmehrichkannnichtmehr]

All the hype around Jon Stewart returning to the daily show is another hype about returning to the good ol 90s when political discourse was about the economy and not the question if youre too woke or woke enough so lets invite the editor in chief of the economist fir an interview and lets talk about how great the thatcher and reagan years were and how big statism and protectionism is 'in' and people in the comments are blurting out praise after praise for jon stewart and how they feel like everything is FINALLY coming back to NORMAL.

I want to scream.

The horrible interview for reference:

[day0one]

Where was Obama during 9/11?!?!?

[swingleftnewsjunkie]

I'm Taking Over The Daily Show... for a week

[thejaymo]

In the Nineties, the American mind was drenched in carefully constructed corporate messaging conveyed by a never-ending torrent of ephemeral media — countless TV channels, newspapers, magazines, and radio shows. Catchphrases, brand logos, product placement, and celebrity gossip were the psychic detritus. We were all swimming in it, and it was about nothing, nothing except itself.

How Stewart Made Tucker | The New Atlantis

A world of authentic, post-spin journalism: The dream Jon Stewart spent a decade making real is now America’s waking nightmare. What did he get so wrong?

[miasknife]

My wife hasn't killed anyone today Now she has a streak if she ruins the streak im gonna give her daily showers

[thinkingnot]

bidding farewell to Trevor Noah Host of the DailyShow, love all the funny bits I can’t believe I have been watching news headlines for entertainment but he made them so witty and funny.

can’t wait for the stand ups he’d be doing more after this and good luck on all his future plans

also the farewell’s from all the correspondents are so funny XD with the touch of their customized roasting sessions

[mifhortunach]

"I definitely wasn’t interested in any pretence of critical objectivity — in fact, as I got into the rhythms of writing the film diary, I found I was more interested in reflecting on the personal associations that a film might have provoked in me, in thinking about the contexts and situations in which I’d seen any particular film before, than I was in offering a judgment or evaluation of the film itself. I certainly didn’t want to offer numerical ratings. Instead, I wrote about the context in which I watched the film — what my day had been like before I sat down to it. I always find myself frustrated when I read film criticism in which the critic writes as though they were a disembodied eye with no personal investment in the film, and I wanted to write in a way which reflected the fact that it was me writing about the film, not anybody else, and that I was always watching whatever film was in a particular place and time. "

"The setting in which a viewing takes place can have a major impact on a spectator’s response to a film — I know this from my own experience, but also from talking to anyone who has ever watched a film. For me, there is a perfect setting for watching a film: I am in a spacious but not enormous cinema screen, which is quiet but not completely empty, on a Sunday afternoon; I’m either on my own or with my partner; I’ve just drunk a glass of red wine and an espresso. It’s extremely rare that I get to watch films in this situation: more often than not (especially so during the height of the pandemic) I watch them on a TV in my living room, or on my laptop while wearing headphones. If I watch Mission: Impossible — Fallout with my friends, and we’re drinking some wine while we watch it, and everyone is making jokes and yelling throughout, that’s a very different experience to watching it on a small screen on the back of a chair on an intercontinental flight. If I watch Jeanne Dielman at home after a day at work, I’ll likely spend a lot of the film resisting — or failing to resist — the urge to look at my phone and stop paying attention to the film; if I watch it in a cinema, at a weekend matinee screening, just after drinking a coffee, then I’m more likely be fully engrossed and absorbed in it.

I was writing a diary, and I was interested in the role that diaries can play in the critique of everyday life, providing as they do a space for reflection, for non-productive venting, for digression, rumination, distraction, without the need to make the links between thoughts explicit. The writing that resulted was a strange mixture of public and private, open and closed — I felt comfortable offering my readers a glimpse of my life, but always felt a need to keep something back. [...] Some people told me they read the diary to get recommendations of what films to watch, but more people told me they read it for the slightly grubby feeling of reading someone else’s journal — for the insight into the mundanity and frustration of my everyday life."