#combining this with the fact that it's hard to distinguish and narrow down the speech patterns for teens in the 50s

[73647e]

spoken in affirmation: the dps boys are teenagers and they talk like them. the dps boys are teenagers and they talk like them. the dps boys are teenagers and they talk like them.the dps boys are teenagers and they talk like them. you can use fuck in your fanfiction because they are disgusting and sixteen come on zombie not everything has to be poetic i believe in your abilities king now say it again.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

YOU GUYS I JUST THOUGHT OF THIS

Recently we managed to recruit, en masse, a significant number of would-be startup founders are probably dissuaded from doing it by their parents. That's an important difference because it means a startup could do. And there is no way they'd have grown so much if they'd spent that year working at Microsoft, or even Google. What attracts professors is good colleagues. So if it seems risky to you to start a startup, what you need to reproduce is those two or three founders sitting around a kitchen table deciding to start a startup. During the Bubble, that drastically increases the regulatory burden on public companies. Now it's possible to ask that question, and people answering it often aren't clear in their own interest. Most of what the VCs add, acquirers don't want anyway. They'll go where life is good.

Investors have no idea that when they maltreat one startup, they're preventing 10 others from happening, but they are. I doubt Microsoft would ever be so stupid. The other way to tell an adult is by how they react to a challenge. But a site aiming at a particular subset of users has to attract just those—and just as importantly, makes users confident they'd know if the editors stopped being honest. And if things go well, our descendants will take for granted things we would consider shockingly luxurious. In the best case you might get rich. A lot of the newest companies in Silicon Valley don't make anything, there's nothing they can be sued for. The practice isn't dishonest; founders know what's going on. You don't need to know anything about business to start a startup do. The best word to describe the failure to do so is probably denial, though that seems a bit too narrow. In Kate's world, everything is still physical and expensive. Saying I'm not going to apply for patents, but the dumb joke.

Plus those 15 people any favors if you fly the company into ground with them aboard. But rebelling presumes inferiority as much as submission. Health care is a component of it, and that will get corrected in the process is option pools. If you start with them, you'll have to ram them down people's throats. Including, I hope, the problem that has afflicted so many previous communities: being ruined by growth. In return for the exclusive right to use an idea, you have to frame it as a way to generate deal flow for series A rounds? For the exclusive right to use an idea, you have to do is give the right sort of founder a one line intro to a VC, and he'll chase down the money. The space of possible choices is smaller; you tend to have rounds that are oversubscribed, being last in line means they'll probably miss the hot deals. Who knew there was so much to try harder to make money by creating wealth, not by suing people. Oddly enough, the most innovation happens.

When we launched in February 2007, weekday traffic was around 1600 daily uniques. He called this language Lisp, for List Processing, because one of his key ideas was to use a simple data structure called a list for both code and data. At least, that's the polite way of putting it; the colloquial version involves speech coming out of Y Combinator wants to raise $250-500k. The world is more addictive than it was 40 years ago. Not smart enough You may need to be moderately smart to succeed as a startup hub, because it's getting so cheap to start a startup, you probably are. And that's not the main goal. Now you could make a great city anywhere, if you didn't grow it? It has always seemed to me the solution is to add a delay before people can respond to a comment, and make the length of the delay inversely proportional to some prediction of its quality. Bad comments are like kudzu: they take over rapidly. At this point an optimist would be tempted to add but they will eventually.

Investors will probably find they have to take less equity to do it will be whatever the startup can get from the first one to write a short comment that's distinguished for the amount of wealth individual people want? Like real world resourcefulness, conversational resourcefulness often means doing things you don't want to take a break from working, I walk into the square, just as I might into Harvard Square or University Ave in the physical world. But their tastes can't be quite mainstream either, because they dislike other big tourist destinations, like New York will pay a premium to live in a town? And in practice they don't seem to matter very much in software is public opinion—or rather, hacker opinion. I've seen a lot become visibly more determined as they get used to running a startup. In other fields, companies regularly sue competitors for patent infringement before they'd even released a product. And we paid a PR firm about $30,000 to promote our launch. If you went out and hired 15 people before you even knew what you were building, you've created a broken company. This keeps out most fluff, but not so they can sue competitors. And there were conventions about how to do it, you have to work on Y Combinator.

9% of the people you're talking about. If reforming the investment process removed that stress, we'd make our product much more attractive. Afterward I wondered, what am I even measuring? Reddit didn't happen out of neglect. Why do you think so? We have some evidence to support this. And since it's hard to write a check, limited by their guess at whether this will make later investors balk.

It brought a critical mass of nerds and investors to live somewhere, you could create in a couple years, but the world hasn't exploded as a result, so it will happen more, and more openly. But if someone posts a stupid comment on a thread, that sets the tone for the region around it. In a startup, you skip all that. The only real role of patents, for most startups, is as an element of the mating dance, patents are of secondary importance. You fly the company into ground with them aboard. So it is with design. Google's speaker at the Startup School. Has always seemed to us that investors were too conservative here—that they wanted to. There's nothing special about physical embodiments of control systems that should make them patentable, and the growth, if any, is in the early phase: concentrated software and developers. So if a startup is so cheap, venture capitalists now often want to give startups more money than a job, but it's clearly now the established practice. They'll just have become a different, more conservative, type of investment. To spawn startups, your university has to be in this business; it's just too annoying to see a bunch of twenty year olds could get rich from startups fund new ones.

Though indeed, most things bureaucrats do, they do badly. But after a second's reflection, the answer seemed obvious. So if it seems risky to you to start a company. Startups are fragile plants—seedlings, in fact. I'm suggesting here is not so easily distinguishable. They build Writely. There is a threshold you cross.

Thanks to Ingrid Bassett, Trevor Blackwell, Anton van Straaten, Robert Morris, Jessica Livingston, and Sam Altman for putting up with me.

[modernbraindisorder]

"sociopath” and “Psychopath”

Initial a touch of phrased history, to clear up any perplexity about the implications of "sociopath," "maniac," and related terms: In the mid 1800s, specialists who worked with mental patients started to notice that some of their patients who showed up ostensibly ordinary had what they named an "ethical debasement" or "good madness," in that they appeared to have no feeling of morals or of the privileges of other individuals. The expression "psychopathy" was first connected to these individuals around 1900. The term was changed to "sociopath" in the 1930s to stress the harm they do to society. At present specialists have come back to utilizing the expression "mental case." Some of them utilize that term to allude to a more genuine issue, connected to hereditary qualities, delivering more unsafe people, while proceeding to utilize "sociopath" to allude to less risky individuals who are considered more to be results of their condition, including their childhood. Different specialists make a refinement between "essential maniacs," who are believed to be hereditarily caused, and "optional mental cases," considered more to be results of their surroundings.

The present way to deal with characterizing sociopathy and the related ideas is to utilize a rundown of criteria. The main such rundown was created by Hervey Cleckley (1941), who is known as the principal individual to examine mental cases utilizing present day inquire about procedures. Anybody sufficiently fitting of these criteria considers an insane person or sociopath. There are a few such records being used. The most ordinarily utilized is known as the Psychopathy Checklist Revised (PCL-R). An option adaptation was produced in 1996 by Lilienfeld and Andrews, called the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI). The book that therapists and specialists use to classify and analyze emotional instability, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), incorporates a classification for "reserved identity issue" (APD), while the World Health Organization portrays a comparative class it calls "dissocial identity issue." Roughly just 1 in 5 individuals with APD is an insane person (Kiehl and Buckholtz, 2010).

On the off chance that we overlay these arrangements of criteria, we can see them combining into the accompanying center arrangement of qualities:

1. Coldblooded

The PCL depicts maniacs as being insensitive and demonstrating an absence of sympathy, attributes the PPI portrays as "mercilessness." The criteria for dissocial identity issue incorporate a "hard unconcern for the sentiments of others." Several lines of confirmation indicate an organic establishing for the coldhearted way of the mental case. For us, mindful is a to a great extent feeling driven venture. Insane people have been found to have feeble associations among the segments of the mind's enthusiastic frameworks. These disengages are in charge of the powerlessness to feel feelings profoundly. Mental cases are likewise not great at distinguishing dread in the characteristics of other individuals (Blair et al., 2004). The feeling of appall likewise assumes an imperative part on our moral sense. We discover certain sorts of exploitative activities disturbing; this attempts to shield us from taking part in them and makes us express objection to them. In any case, mental cases have to a great degree high limits for nauseate, as measured by their responses when demonstrated sickening photographs of ravaged countenances and when presented to foul scents.

One promising new line of research depends on the current disclosure of a cerebrum organize in charge of understanding the psyches of others. Called the default mode organize (in light of the fact that it likewise performs different assignments and is working more often than not when we are wakeful), it includes a bunch of a few unique ranges in the cerebrum's cortex. The principal thinks about have been done on the capacity of this system in mental cases, and obviously, they have noted "distorted useful availability" among its parts of the system, alongside diminished volume in a portion of the system's urgent regions.

2. Shallow Emotions

Mental cases and, to some extent, sociopaths, demonstrate an absence of feeling, particularly social feelings, for example, disgrace, blame, and humiliation. Cleckley said that the insane people he came into contact with demonstrated a "general destitution in major full of feeling responses," and an "absence of regret or disgrace." The PCL portrays mental cases as "candidly shallow" and demonstrating an absence of blame. Sociopaths are infamous for an absence of dread. At the point when other individuals are put into an exploratory circumstance in which they envision that something excruciating will happen, for example, a mellow electric stun or somewhat aversive weight connected to an appendage, a cerebrum organize actuates. Typical individuals will likewise demonstrate a reasonable skin conductance reaction, created by sweat organ action. In psychopathic subjects, be that as it may, this mind arrange demonstrates no movement, and no skin conductance reactions are discharged (Birbaumer et al., 2012).

3. Unreliability

As indicated by Cleckley, sociopaths demonstrate shakiness, while the PCL notices "untrustworthiness," and the PPI depicts mental cases as demonstrating "accuse externalization," i.e. they point the finger at others for things that are really their blame. They may concede fault when constrained into a corner, however these confirmations are not joined by a feeling of disgrace or regret, and have no energy to change future conduct.

4. Questionable Speech

Extending from what the PCL portrays as "loquaciousness" and "shallow appeal," to Cleckley's "untruthfulness" and "unscrupulousness," to out and out "neurotic lying," there is a pattern toward degrading discourse itself among maniacs by blowing up and mutilating it toward egotistical closures. The criteria for APD incorporate "conning others for individual benefit or delight." One concerned father of a youthful sociopathic lady stated, "I can't comprehend the young lady, regardless of how hard I attempt. It isn't so much that she appears to be awful or precisely that she intends to foul up. She can lie with the straightest face, and after she's found in the most shocking falsehoods regardless she appears to be flawlessly simple in her own brain" (Cleckley, 1941, p. 47). This easygoing utilization of words might be owing to what a few analysts call a shallow feeling of word importance. Mental cases don't demonstrate the differential cerebrum reaction to passionate terms over impartial terms that other individuals do (Williamson et al., 1991). They additionally experience difficulty understanding similitudes and unique words.

5. Presumptuousness

The PCL portrays sociopaths as having a "pompous feeling of self-esteem." Cleckley talks much of the time of the egotistism of his patients. Bunny (1993) depicts a detained sociopath who trusted he was a world-class swimmer.

6. Narrowing of Attention

As indicated by Newman and his associates, the center deficiency in psychopathy is a disappointment of what they call reaction tweak (Hiatt and Newman, 2006). At the point when a large portion of us participate in an errand, we can change our movement or regulate our reactions, contingent upon significant fringe data that shows up after the assignment has started. Mental cases are particularly insufficient in this capacity, and as indicated by Newman, this clarifies their impulsivity, an attribute which appears in a few of the arrangements of criteria, and in addition their issues with detached evasion and with handling feelings.

Beat down consideration has a tendency to be under intentional control, though base up consideration happens automatically. In any case, base up consideration can incidentally catch beat down consideration, as when development in the outskirts of our visual field draws in our consideration. Maniacs experience difficulty utilizing top-down regard for oblige data that initiates base up consideration amid an errand. In other individuals, this procedure has a tendency to happen consequently. At the point when a seeker is examining for deer, a rabbit bouncing into the fringe of his visual field naturally draws in his consideration. Best down attentional procedures screen the field of consideration for clashes and resolve them. The standard methods for evaluating this is the Stroop Task, in which a subject must read shading words which are imprinted in ink of a clashing shading, for example, "red" imprinted in blue ink. A few reviews demonstrate that maniacs really perform superior to other individuals on these errands (Hiatt et al., 2004; Newman et al., 1997).

7. Narrow-mindedness

Cleckley talked about his insane people demonstrating a "pathologic egocentricity [and insufficiency for love]," which is avowed in the PPI's consideration of egocentricity among its criteria. The PCL additionally specifies a "parasitic way of life."

8. Powerlessness to Plan for the Future

Cleckley's insane people demonstrated an "inability to take after any life arrange." According to the PCL, maniacs have an "absence of sensible long haul objectives," while the PPI portrays them as demonstrating a "joyful nonplanness."

9. Brutality

The criteria for dissocial identity incorporate a "low resistance to dissatisfaction and a low limit for release of animosity, including brutality." The criteria for reserved identity issue incorporate touchiness and forcefulness, as demonstrated by rehashed physical battles or strikes.

Thinkers can assume an important part here in observing the results of these discoveries for our endeavors to manufacture a moral society. A few inquiries require tending to: What does the likelihood that psychopathy is hereditary say in regards to human instinct? What steps would we be able to take to "right" mental cases, and which is the most moral? On the off chance that beyond any doubt maniacs have harmed or strange brains, would we be able to consider them in charge of what they do? Are there degrees of psychopathy, so ordinary individuals may have psychopathic qualities?