#carabello

[retropopcult]

August 16, 1969 - Woodstock, Day 2: Santana takes the stage in the afternoon. When they launch into an extended version of "Soul Sacrifice" the crowd of over 400,000 goes wild.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

Following publication of the final report there have been a number of questions and points for clarification about the findings and recommendations. We have collated those questions, along with our answers, on this page.

-

Did the Review set a higher bar for evidence than would normally be expected?

No, the approach to the assessment of study quality was the same as would be applied to other areas of clinical practice – the bar was not set higher for this Review.

Clarification:

The same level of rigour should be expected when looking at the best treatment approaches for this population as for any other population so as not to perpetuate the disadvantaged position this group have been placed in when looking for information on treatment options.

The systematic reviews undertaken by the University of York as part of the Review’s independent research programme are the largest and most comprehensive to date. They looked at 237 papers from 18 countries, providing information on a total of 113,269 children and adolescents.

All of the University of York’s systematic review research papers were subject to peer review, a cornerstone of academic rigour and integrity to ensure that the methods, findings, and interpretation of the findings met the highest standards of quality, validity and impartiality.

-

Did the Review reject studies that were not double blind randomised control trials in its systematic review of evidence for puberty blockers and masculinising / feminising hormones?

No. There were no randomised control studies identified in the systematic reviews, but other types of studies were included if they were well designed and conducted.

Clarification:

The Review commissioned the University of York to undertake an independent research programme to ensure the work of the Review and its recommendations were informed by the most robust existing evidence. This included a series of systematic reviews which brought together, analysed and evaluated existing evidence on a range of issues relating to the care of gender-questioning children and young people, including epidemiology, treatment approaches and international models of current practice.

Randomised control trials are considered the gold standard in relation to research, but there are many other study designs that can give valuable information. Explanatory Box 1 (pages 49-51 of the final report) discusses in more detail the different kinds of studies that can be used, and how to decide if a study is poorly designed or biased.

Blinding is a separate issue. It means that either the patient or the researcher does not know if the patient is getting an active treatment or a ‘control’ (which might be another treatment or a placebo). Patients cannot be blinded as to whether or not they are receiving puberty blockers or masculinising / feminising hormones, because the effects would rapidly become obvious. Good RCTs can be conducted without blinding.

The University of York’s systematic review search did not identify any RCTs, blinded or otherwise, but many other studies were included. Most of the studies included were called ‘cohort studies’. Well-designed and executed high quality cohort studies are used in other areas of medicine, and the bar was not set higher for this review; even so the quality of the studies was mostly only assessed as moderate.

-

Did the Review reject 98% of papers demonstrating the benefits of affirmative care?

No. Studies were identified for inclusion in the synthesis (conclusions) of the systematic reviews on puberty blockers and masculinising/feminising hormones on the basis of their quality. This was assessed using a standard quality assessment tool appropriate to the types of study identified.  All high quality and moderate quality reviews were included in the synthesis of results. This totalled 58% of the 103 papers.

Clarification:

The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (a standard appraisal tool) was used to compare the studies. This scores items such as participant selection, comparability of groups (how alike they are), the outcomes of the studies and how these were assessed (data provided and whether it is representative of those studied). High quality studies (scoring >75%) would score well on most of these items; moderate quality studies (scoring >50% – 75%) would miss some elements (which could affect outcomes); and low-quality studies would score 50% or less on the items the scale looked at. A major weakness of the studies was that they did not have adequate follow-up – in many cases they did not follow young people for long enough for the long-term outcomes to be understood.

Because the ranking was based on how the studies were undertaken (their quality and execution), low quality research was removed before the results were analysed as the findings could not be completely trusted. Had an RCT been available it would also have been excluded from the systematic review if it was deemed to be of poor quality.

The puberty blocker systematic review included 50 studies. One was high quality, 25 were moderate quality and 24 were low quality. The systematic review of masculinising/feminising hormones included 53 studies. One was high quality, 33 were moderate quality and 19 were low quality.

All high quality and moderate quality reviews were included, however as only two of the studies across these two systematic reviews were identified as being of high quality, this has been misinterpreted by some to mean that only two studies were considered and the rest were discarded. In reality, conclusions were based on the high quality and moderate quality studies (i.e. 58% of the total studies based on the quality assessment). More information about this process in included in Box 2 (pages 54-56 of the final report)

-

Has the Review recommended that no one should transition before the age of 25 and that Gillick competence should be overturned.

No.  The Review has not commented on the use of masculinising/feminising hormones on people over the age of 18. This is outside of the scope of the Review. The Review has not stated that Gillick competence should be overturned.

The Review has recommended that:

“NHS England should ensure that each Regional Centre has a follow through service for 17-25-year-olds; either by extending the range of the regional children and young people’s service or through linked services, to ensure continuity of care and support at a potentially vulnerable stage in their journey. This will also allow clinical, and research follow-up data to be collected.”

This recommendation only relates to people referred into the children and young people’s service before the age of 17 to enable their care to be continued within the follow-through service up to the age of 25.

Clarification:

Currently, young people are discharged from the young people’s service at the age of 17, often to an adult gender clinic. Some of these young people have been receiving direct care from the NHS gender service (GIDS as was) and others have not yet reached the top of the waiting list and have “aged out” of the young people’s service before being seen.

The Review understands that this is a particularly vulnerable time for young people. A follow-through service continuing up to age 25, would remove the need for transition (that is, transfer) to adult services and support continuity of care and continued access to a broader multi-disciplinary team. This would be consistent with other service areas supporting young people that are selectively moving to a ‘0-25 years’ service to improve continuity of care.

The follow-through service would also benefit those seeking support from adult gender services, as these young people would not be added to the waiting list for adult services and, in the longer-term, as more gender services are established, capacity of adult provision across the country would be increased.

People aged 18 and over, who had not been referred to the NHS children and young people’s gender service, would still be referred directly to adult clinics.

-

Is the Review recommending that puberty blockers should be banned?

No. Puberty blocker medications are used to address a number of different conditions. The Review has considered the evidence in relation to safety and efficacy (clinical benefit) of the medications for use in young people with gender incongruence/gender dysphoria.

The Review found that not enough is known about the longer-term impacts of puberty blockers for children and young people with gender incongruence to know whether they are safe or not, nor which children might benefit from their use.

Ahead of publication of the final report NHS England took the decision to stop the routine use of puberty blockers for gender incongruence / gender dysphoria in children.  NHS England and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) are establishing a clinical trial to ensure the effects of puberty blockers can be safely monitored. Within this trial, puberty blockers will be available for children with gender incongruence/ dysphoria where there is clinical agreement that the individual may benefit from taking them.

Clarification:

Puberty blockers have been used to suppress puberty in children and young people who start puberty much too early (precocious puberty). They have undergone extensive testing for use in precocious puberty (a very different indication from use in gender dysphoria) and have met strict safety requirements to be approved for this condition. This is because the puberty blockers are suppressing hormone levels that are abnormally high for the age of the child.

This is different to stopping the normal surge of hormones that occur in puberty. Pubertal hormones are needed for psychological, psychosexual and brain development, and there is not yet enough information on the risks of stopping the influence of pubertal hormones at this critical life stage.

When deciding if certain treatments should be routinely available through the NHS it is not enough to demonstrate that a medication doesn’t cause harm, it needs to be demonstrated that it will deliver clinical benefit in a defined group of patients.

Over the past few years, the most common age that young people have been receiving puberty blockers in England has been 15 when most young people are already well advanced in their puberty. The new services will be looking at the best approaches to support young people through this period when they are still making decisions about longer-term options.

-

Has the Review recommended that social transition should only be undertaken under medical guidance?

The Review has advised that a more cautious approach around social transition needs to be taken for pre-pubertal children than for adolescents and has recommended that:

“When families/carers are making decisions about social transition of pre-pubertal children, services should ensure that they can be seen as early as possible by a clinical professional with relevant experience.”

Parents are encouraged to seek clinical help and advice in deciding how to support a child with gender incongruence and should be prioritised on the waiting list for early consultation on this issue. This should include discussion of the risks and benefits and the voice of the child should be heard. It will be important that flexibility is maintained, and options remain open.

Clarification:

Although the University of York’s systematic review found that there is no clear evidence that social transition in childhood has positive or negative mental health outcomes, there are studies demonstrating that for a majority of young children presenting with gender incongruence, this resolves through puberty. There is also evidence from studies of young people with differences of sex development (DSD) that sex of rearing seems to have some influence on eventual gender outcome, and it is possible that social transition in childhood may change the trajectory of gender identity development for children with early gender incongruence. Living in stealth from early childhood may also lead to stress, particularly as puberty approaches.

There is relatively weak evidence for any effect of social transition in adolescence. The Review recognises that for adolescents, exploration is a normal process, and rigid binary gender stereotypes can be unhelpful. Many adolescents will go through a period of gender non-conformity in terms of outward expressions (e.g. hairstyle, make-up, clothing and behaviours). They also have greater agency in how they present themselves and in their decision-making.

Young people and young adults have spoken positively about how social transition helped to reduce their gender dysphoria and feel more comfortable in themselves. They identified that space to talk about socially transitioning and how to handle conversations with parents/carers and others would be helpful. The Review has therefore advised that it is important to try and ensure that those already actively involved in the young person’s welfare provide support in decision making and that plans are in place to ensure that the young person is protected from bullying and has a trusted source of support.

Further detail can be found in Chapter 12 of the Final Report.

-

Did the Review speak to any gender-questioning and trans people when developing its recommendations?

Yes, the Review has been underpinned by an extensive programme of proactive engagement, which is described in Chapter 1 of the report. The Review has met with over 1000 individuals and organisations across the breadth of opinion on this subject but prioritised two categories of stakeholders:

People with relevant lived experience (direct or as a parent/carer) and organisations working with LGBTQ+ children and young people generally.

Clinicians and other relevant professionals with experience of and/ or responsibility for providing care and support to children and young people within specialist gender services and beyond.

A mixed-methods approach was taken, which included weekly listening sessions with people with lived experience, 6-weekly meetings with support and advocacy groups throughout the course of the Review, and focus groups with young people and young adults.

Reports from the focus groups with young people with lived experience are published on the Review’s website and the learning from these sessions and the listening sessions are represented in the final report.

The Review also commissioned qualitative research from the University of York, who conducted interviews with young people, young adults, parents and clinicians. A summary of the findings from this research is included as appendix 3 of the final report.

-

What is the Review’s position on conversion therapy?

Whilst the Review’s terms of reference do not include consideration of the proposed legislation to ban conversion practices, it believes that no LGBTQ+ group should be subjected to conversion practice. It also maintains the position that children and young people with gender dysphoria may have a range of complex psychosocial challenges and/or mental health problems impacting on their gender-related distress. Exploration of these issues is essential to provide diagnosis, clinical support and appropriate intervention.

The intent of psychological intervention is not to change the person’s perception of who they are but to work with them to explore their concerns and experiences and help alleviate their distress, regardless of whether they pursue a medical pathway or not. It is harmful to equate this approach to conversion therapy as it may prevent young people from getting the emotional support they deserve and make clinicians fearful of providing this group of children and young people the same care as is afforded to other children and young people.

No formal science-based training in psychotherapy, psychology or psychiatry teaches or advocates conversion therapy. If an individual were to carry out such practices they would be acting outside of professional guidance, and this would be a matter for the relevant regulator.

==

Like any religious fanatics, pathological liars like "Erin" Reed and "Alejandra" Carballo still won't stop lying, since it's all they have. But their disciples should really be noticing how they've been directly refuted.

[nocurnalday]

Canon Jason and an alt Jason design

A while back I realized he looks like he's from my mom's side on the family, so I thought about what he would look like if I made him look like he was from my dad's side instead, with an alt surname included haha

[longliverockback]

Santana [Legacy Edition] 2004 Columbia ————————————————— Tracks CD One: 01. Waiting 02. Evil Ways 03. Shades of Time 04. Savor 05. Jingo 06. Persuasión 07. Treat 08. You Just Don’t Care 09. Soul Sacrifice 10. Savor [alternate take #2] 11. Soul Sacrifice [alternate Take #4]

Tracks CD Two: Original Album Sessions 01. Fried Neckbones 02. Soul Sacrifice 03. Persuasion 04. Treat 05. Shades of Time 06. Jingo Live at the Woodstock Music & Arts Festival, August 1969 07. Waiting 08. You Just Don’t Care 09. Savor 10. Jingo 11. Persuasion 12. Soul Sacrifice 13. Fried Neckbones —————————————————

José Áreas “Chepito”

David Brown

Mike Carabello

Gregg Rolie

Carlos Santana

Michael Shrieve

* Long Live Rock Archive

[elsotemo]

[mitjalovse]

Carlos Santana's career could be understood as a study in great surprises. I mean, very few could've reconciled some of his early works with his jazz fusion collaborations or his post-Supernatural big budget wannabe sonic blockbusters in search of their platinum certifications. Check the early platters of his and notice how they tend to be rooted in the late 60's psychedelic rock, yet observe he added his own Latin influences into the mix. Moreover, his band grooved like crazy as you can hear on the link. The tune from their debut I posted introduced an intriguing notion of rock not many played, when he debuted on the scene. However, they didn't stop there, they went further in their development than many could've anticipated.

[carsonjonesfiance]

Ideologically I dislike Alejandra Carabello (@esqueer on Twitter) for having the kind of radiqueer politics that I find deeply counterproductive (e.g. calling for a federal protection of same sex civil unions to “die” because the language didn’t include marriage) BUT getting her account suspended for doxxing neonazi webcomic artist stonetoss, telling X Support that Antifa framed her so it got reinstated, then immediately getting suspended again after changing her Twitter name to “Hans Kristian Graebner is Stonetoss”…… kinda based.

[doctorzosfavoritemusic]

Santana is an American rock band formed in San Francisco in 1966 by Mexican-born guitarist Carlos Santana. The band has undergone multiple recording and performing line-ups in its history, with Santana the only consistent member. After signing with Columbia Records, the band's appearance at the Woodstock Festival in 1969 increased their profile and went on to record the commercially successful and critically-acclaimed albums Santana (1969), Abraxas (1970), and Santana III (1971). These were recorded by the group's "classic" line-up, featuring Gregg Rolie, Michael Carabello, Michael Shrieve, David Brown, and José "Chepito" Areas. Hit songs of this period include "Evil Ways", "Black Magic Woman", "Oye Como Va", and the instrumental "Samba Pa Ti". Santana is one of the best-selling groups of all time with over 47 million certified albums sold in the US, and an estimated 100 million sold worldwide. Its discography includes 25 studio albums, 14 of which reached the US top 10. In 1998, Santana was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

"Samba pa ti" is an instrumental by Latin rock band Santana, from their 1970 album, Abraxas. It was released as a single in 1973. The song was written by Carlos Santana after he witnessed a jazz saxophonist playing in the street outside his apartment. In 2008, Santana told Mojo that "Samba Pa Ti" was the first song he felt he could call his own.

Label Columbia Songwriter Carlos Santana Producer(s) Fred Catero, Carlos Santana

[lady-wildflower]

Also, worth noting that calling it "Holocaust denialism," as Aye and Alejandra Carabello (and myself) have, is not hyperbole.

JK Rowling is denying that trans people were targetted by the Nazis, and promoting the tweets of known anti-trans activists screeching that any insistence that we were is "the LGBTQ+ lobby" revising history. That is, by a 2022 ruling on a case regarding similar tweets by the Regional Court of Cologne, (translation) "a denial of Nazi crimes."

She is, by German court precedent, quite literally engaging in an element of Holocaust denial.

Edit: Yeah so, TERFs can fuck off, obviously, but it's very funny to see one in my reblogs and check their blog to see if I can whack any more moles with the blockhammer via who they reblog from and find that, of course, they're a horrible person. Scratch a TERF.

Also, I don't know what they intend other than to get blocked - TERFs, you're not worth my time nor energy :)

Funny what a little bit of Holocaust denialism will get you trending with.

[singeratlarge]

HAPPY BIRTHDAY to Hank Ballard, Brand X’s 1977 LP LIVESTOCK, Jake Brockman (Echo & the Bunnymen), film composer Carter Burwell, Michael Carabello (Santana), trumpeter-bandleader Don Cherry, Imogene Coca, Linda Evans, Fabolous, composer-violist Lillian Fuchs, Kirk Hammett, Mexican Golden Age actor-singer Pedro Infante, Amanda Lear, Cherokee activist Wilma Mankiller, Paul McCartney’s 1985 single “Spies Like Us,” Metallica’s 1997 RELOAD album, Jeramy Mohler, Eugene Ormandy, Graham Parker, John Parr, Herman Rarebell (Scorpions), Cindy Blackman Santana, Rudy Sarzo, Compay Segundo, Duncan Sheik, astronaut Alan Sheperd, the 1930 Fred Astaire/Bob Hope musical SMILES, Howard Thurman, Shania Twain’s 2002 UP! album, Brenda Vaccaro, J.C. Watts, Kim Wilde, Owen Wilson, and the Great American singer-songwriter Johnny Mercer.

Among his many hit songs are now-standards such as “Autumn Leaves” and “Moon River”—all told he wrote lyrics for 1500 published songs. Besides winning many awards, he co-founded Capitol Records, the first “indie label” of the 20th Century not dependent on the film industry or other corporate interests. Mercer was one of those fabled “napkin writers,” meaning he’d grab any scrap of paper handy, throw down lyrics, then have a demo ready within hours. “Ac-Cent-Tchu-Ate the Positive” was inspired by a sermon he heard on the radio. Normally he’d pitch the song to other singers but it was perfect for his voice. His recording was a Top 10 hit and has been used in several films. Here’s my take—I’ve grown fond of it and it’s a touchstone of my “assisted living home set.”

https://johnnyjblairsingeratlarge.bandcamp.com/track/ac-cent-tchu-ate-the-positive

#johnnymercer #positive #accentuate #singersongwriter #greatamericansongbook #napkin #film #soundtrack #assistedlivinghome #carehome #johnnyjblair #singeratlarge #birthday

[onehandtypingb1]

Song of the Day: Santana, "Singing Winds, Crying Beasts"

Happy 76th birthday to percussionist Michael Carabello. He’s best known for playing congas for the band Santana through their first three albums. He wrote “Singing Winds, Crying Beasts,” the first track on 1970’s Abraxas, Santana’s second album.

[memorableconcerts]

Santana - "Africa Bamba"

Santana é uma banda americana, formada por um número variável de músicos que acompanham o guitarrista e compositor mexicano Carlos Santana desde o fim da década de 1960. Como o próprio Santana, a banda é conhecida por ter ajudado a difundir o latin rock por todo o mundo.

A banda foi formada em 1967 em San Francisco. A primeira formação consistia do próprio Santana na guitarra solo, Tom Fraser na guitarra base, Mike Carabello na percussão, Rod Harper na bateria e percussão, Gus Rodriguez no baixo e Gregg Rolie nos vocais e teclados. Nos anos seguintes os membros do grupo foram trocados com frequência, por diversos motivos, e de 1971 a 1972 chegou a ocorrer um breve rompimento entre o grupo e Carlos Santana.

O próprio Santana raramente canta suas canções, apesar de ser o líder da banda; os sucessos mais recentes frequentemente são cantados por um convidado, e não por algum membro da banda.

Em 1998 o grupo foi aceito no Rock & Roll Hall of Fame, com Carlos Santana, Jose Chepito Areas, David Brown, Mike Carabello, Gregg Rolie e Michael Shrieve recebendo a honra.

[rollingstonesdata]

ROLLING STONES SONGS: 'START ME UP' (1981)

Rolling Stones songs: Start Me Up*Click for MORE ROLLING STONES SONGS 1962-PRESENTMy eyes dilate, my lips go green/ My hands are greasy/ She’s a mean, mean machine… Written by: Jagger/RichardsRecorded: EMI-Pathé Marconi Studios, Paris, France, Jan. 6-March 2 1978; Electric Lady Studios, New York, USA, June 10-Oct. 19 1979Guest musicians: Mike Carabello (percussion), Chris Kimsey and Barry Sage…

[rtrucios]

Viernes de buena música con @carlossantana Un lujo este recopilatorio que lo he escuchado desde que era un bebé y mi papá siempre lo escuchaba. Santana's Greatest Hits es el primer disco recopilatorio publicado en 1974, con 34.31 minutos de duración bajo el sello discográfico de CBS Records, trae las canciones más emblemáticas de los tres primeros álbumes, Santana, Abraxas y Santana III. Este LP lo pude conseguir gracias a mis paseos por el centro de Lima en Jirón Quilca, no es nuevo, pero que recuerdos me trae de mi infancia. Un día de estos se lo llevaré a mi papá para disfrutarlo acompañado de una botella de whisky con hielo :) Aqui te dejo las canciones que contiene 1. "Evil Ways" (Single version) (Clarence "Sonny" Henry) - 3:00 2. "Jingo" (Babatunde Olatunji) - 4:22 3. "Hope You're Feeling Better" (Gregg Rolie) - 4:11 4. "Samba Pa Ti" (Carlos Santana) - 4:47 5. "Persuasion" (Single version) (Santana, Rolie, José Areas, David Brown, Michael Shrieve, Michael Carabello) - 2:34 6. "Black Magic Woman" (Single version) (Peter Green) - 3:17 7. "Oye Como Va" (Tito Puente) 4:19 8. "Everything's Coming Our Way" (Santana) - 3:16 9. "Se a Cabó" (Areas) - 2:51 10. "Everybody's Everything" (Santana, Tyrone Moss, Brown) - 3:31 Un sonido bestial para disfrutar a todo volumen !!! DATO CURIOSO: El LP que tenia mi padre tenia una falla y es que al terminar el disco, el surco no llegaba hasta el final y por ende la aguja del tornemesa se quedaba girando y tenias que detenerlo de forma manual, este disco tiene la misma característica. #vinyl #vinylcollection #discosdevinilo #vinyladdict #vinylcollector #longplay #vinylcommunity #vinyligclub #vinylrecords #vinyloftheday #vinylgram #vinylcollectionpost #vinylcollector #vinyls #vinyllove #vinylclub #vinylrecord #musicaenvinilo #vinyllover #tornamesa #VinylLife #tocadiscos #vinylcollective #discodeldia #melomano #musiclover #musica #discosdevinilo #vinilos #longplay #santana https://www.instagram.com/p/Cn8ehcINBe4/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[elarea]

Piantadino F. C. (1956)

Gracias al aporte del amigo Alejandro Schenzer se ha sumado la foto del desaparecido Piantadino F. C.

La fotografía apareció en la también desaparecida revista Fútbol Actualidad en el año 1956 y ha entrado a formar parte de la Galería de Extintos equipos de Ligas Barriales, Comerciales y Colectividades, que de esta manera asciende a las 90 imágenes.

Según se comenta en la publicación: En Piedras Blancas, fue fundado el 30 de marzo de 1954, Piantadino F.C. y sus actuaciones merecieron siempre cálidas expresiones. Con júbilo recibieron en el barrio los frecuentes triunfos y los muchachos se han hecho acreedores a lisonjeras frases de elogios.

El conjunto está integrado por los siguientes muchachos: Olivera; Rodríguez y Arucán: Cabrera; López y Carabello; Faltes, Dorado, C. López, Manghini y Pereyra.

Comisión Directiva que rige los destinos de la entidad por el período presente: presidente: J. López; vi-ce-presidente: R. Rodino; secretario general: Fabert; secretario: J. Miranda; tesorero; A. López y vocales: L. Díaz, T. Rodríguez y S. Agraden.