#bumpstocks

[friedzonkpatrolrascal]

The Truth About BUMP STOCKS - Is It a Machine Gun? (Slo-Mo Analysis)

[inkandguns]

if Trump had balls he’d be threatening Mexico to drop the Smith and Wesson lawsuit or lose all federal funding.

but so far I haven’t seen any support for 2A from that guy at all, whatsoever.

still a better choice than Kamala, but weak as fuck on 2A.

[apas-95]

the obsession in civilian firearms with skirting around automatic actions with bumpstocks and such is really funny considering cyclic fire is only situationally used in modern combat

[joeby549]

no doubt the nra clucks only use guns with bumpstocks...

[conniejoworld]

Supreme Court IS CORRUPT!: The Bumpstock Decision | Christopher Titus Po...

[marley39]

Bumpstocks

It’s not the bump stock that destroyed people it was the people using them that was the problem.



[docholt0000]

Gubermint news outlet and Gubermint representative outright lie to people about Bumpstocks !!!

https://youtu.be/gSDfuQ56PQU?si=gVPDkE13hV3UkLaj

[adiariomx]

La Corte Suprema emite fallo que convierte en ilegal la prohibición federal a los llamados bump stocks, que permiten mayor rapidez de disparo a los ri...

[masterofd1saster]

CJ court watch - the bumpstock case

SCt decided Garland v. Cargill, 602 U. S. __ (2024) today. The decision was 6-3 and broke along familiar ideological lines.

The issue was the definition of machine gun and whether ATF could redefine semiautomatic rifles to be machine guns on its own initiative.

Congress has long restricted access to “‘machinegun[s],’” a category of firearms defined by the ability to “shoot, automatically more than one shot . . . by a single function of the trigger.” 26 U. S. C. §5845(b); see also 18 U. S. C. §922(o). Semiautomatic firearms, which require shooters to reengage the trigger for every shot, are not machineguns. This case asks whether a bump stock—an accessory for a semiautomatic rifle that allows the shooter to rapidly reengage the trigger (and therefore achieve a high rate of fire)��converts the rifle into a “machinegun.” We hold that it does not and therefore affirm.*** For many years, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) took the position that semiautomatic rifles equipped with bump stocks were not machineguns under the statute. On more than 10 separate occasions over several administrations, ATF consistently concluded that rifles equipped with bump stocks cannot “automatically” fire more than one shot “by a single function of the trigger.”*** ATF abruptly reversed course in response to a mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada. In October 2017, a gunman fired on a crowd attending an outdoor music festival in Las Vegas, killing 58 people and wounding over 500 more. The gunman equipped his weapons with bump stocks, which allowed him to fire hundreds of rounds in a matter of minutes.*** ATF’s aboutface drew criticism from some observers, including those who agreed that bump stocks should be banned. Senator Dianne Feinstein, for example, warned that ATF lacked statutory authority to prohibit bump stocks, explaining that the proposed regulation “‘hinge[d] on a dubious analysis’” and that the “‘gun lobby and manufacturers [would] have a field day with [ATF’s] reasoning’” in court. Statement on Regulation To Ban Bump Stocks (Mar. 23, 2018). She asserted that “‘legislation is the only way to ban bump stocks.’” Ibid. ATF issued its final Rule in 2018. 83 Fed. Reg. 66514***

There was basically no way of getting around Congress's definition that "machine gun" means a single trigger action results in more than one round discharged. Bump stocks don't change the weapon or the firing mechanism, they just make it easier/faster to operate the trigger.

[newestmusic]

(via bumpstock [tttwofour])

[docholt0000]

THIS SO CALLED GUN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION THINKS YOU AND I ARE STUPID !!!

THEY ARE BRINGING UP GARBAGE TO DIVIDE GUN OWNERS WITH INCOMPLETE FACTS AND HISTORY !!!

THEY ARE PRESENTING THINGS SELECTIVELY FOR THEIR OWN LEFTIST AGENDA !!!

THEY KNOW THE THE PROBLEM WITH THE ATF DIDN'T BEGIN WITH BUMPSTOCKS !!!

https://youtu.be/-GvBcY7nBTk?si=l2E7u2ZpVFZet9xc

#WRONG #ANSWER 

[dronebait]

[kalashni-cola]

Like I said.

Boating Accident.

[trexarmskydex]

From our COO @davidtrexarms trexarms - “This imminent "rule change" sets a terrible precedent. Is it too hard or painful to change the law? Are checks and balances, like a bicameral legislature, blocking you? Just twist (or ignore!) the letter of the law to accommodate a "rule change" and do whatever you want. Despicable and despotic. Oath violation. Trump and the NRA (who advocated for this rule change "solution") have now done more harm to gun rights than Obama ever did. Rumor is the rule will be published in the Federal Register on Friday at which time the 90-day destruction/abandonment window will start. Personally, I don't care for bump stocks or even full-auto infantry carbines. Last FA gun I shot was an HK416. Fun, but I would have completed the course of fire faster with my BCM 16" middy. In 95% of use cases involving carbines, semi-auto is MORE EFFECTIVE. Interviews with combat vets and a study of military history bears this out. But the fact that bump-stocks are useless (and stupid) in my opinion does not change the Bill of Rights or the process for passing a law. This is a deadly departure from the checks and balances instituted by our Founding Fathers. Even liberals should tremble at the dangerous new world we are entering. By the way, while Trump is acting despotic, why doesn't he use this power to keep some campaign promises? There's still no National Reciprocity, for example, and my tax dollars are still funding Planned Parenthood.” - #nra #bumpstocks #freedom https://www.instagram.com/p/BrilEYUBoQK/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=1pzl81scfwpz9