#bumpstocks

[friedzonkpatrolrascal]

The Truth About BUMP STOCKS - Is It a Machine Gun? (Slo-Mo Analysis)

[apas-95]

the obsession in civilian firearms with skirting around automatic actions with bumpstocks and such is really funny considering cyclic fire is only situationally used in modern combat

[pillarofawesome]

I saw a guntuber recently talking about a "legal victory" against the NFA when the bumpstock rule was struck down by the courts.

I don't see it that way. By saying bumpstocks were a bridge too far, you're basically implying all the other bans in the NFA are legitimate.

The whole act itself isn't worth tha paper it's printed on.

On the bright side it's comforting to see how widespread and open the attitude of noncompliance has been with the latest pistol brace shenanigans.

"Fuck the ATF and the NFA" is becoming the dominant mindset of American gun owners but more importantly we're starting to actually mean it.

[conniejoworld]

Supreme Court IS CORRUPT!: The Bumpstock Decision | Christopher Titus Po...

[marley39]

Bumpstocks

It’s not the bump stock that destroyed people it was the people using them that was the problem.



[docholt0000]

Gubermint news outlet and Gubermint representative outright lie to people about Bumpstocks !!!

https://youtu.be/gSDfuQ56PQU?si=gVPDkE13hV3UkLaj

[adiariomx]

La Corte Suprema emite fallo que convierte en ilegal la prohibición federal a los llamados bump stocks, que permiten mayor rapidez de disparo a los ri...

[masterofd1saster]

CJ court watch - the bumpstock case

SCt decided Garland v. Cargill, 602 U. S. __ (2024) today. The decision was 6-3 and broke along familiar ideological lines.

The issue was the definition of machine gun and whether ATF could redefine semiautomatic rifles to be machine guns on its own initiative.

Congress has long restricted access to “‘machinegun[s],’” a category of firearms defined by the ability to “shoot, automatically more than one shot . . . by a single function of the trigger.” 26 U. S. C. §5845(b); see also 18 U. S. C. §922(o). Semiautomatic firearms, which require shooters to reengage the trigger for every shot, are not machineguns. This case asks whether a bump stock—an accessory for a semiautomatic rifle that allows the shooter to rapidly reengage the trigger (and therefore achieve a high rate of fire)—converts the rifle into a “machinegun.” We hold that it does not and therefore affirm.*** For many years, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) took the position that semiautomatic rifles equipped with bump stocks were not machineguns under the statute. On more than 10 separate occasions over several administrations, ATF consistently concluded that rifles equipped with bump stocks cannot “automatically” fire more than one shot “by a single function of the trigger.”*** ATF abruptly reversed course in response to a mass shooting in Las Vegas, Nevada. In October 2017, a gunman fired on a crowd attending an outdoor music festival in Las Vegas, killing 58 people and wounding over 500 more. The gunman equipped his weapons with bump stocks, which allowed him to fire hundreds of rounds in a matter of minutes.*** ATF’s aboutface drew criticism from some observers, including those who agreed that bump stocks should be banned. Senator Dianne Feinstein, for example, warned that ATF lacked statutory authority to prohibit bump stocks, explaining that the proposed regulation “‘hinge[d] on a dubious analysis’” and that the “‘gun lobby and manufacturers [would] have a field day with [ATF’s] reasoning’” in court. Statement on Regulation To Ban Bump Stocks (Mar. 23, 2018). She asserted that “‘legislation is the only way to ban bump stocks.’” Ibid. ATF issued its final Rule in 2018. 83 Fed. Reg. 66514***

There was basically no way of getting around Congress's definition that "machine gun" means a single trigger action results in more than one round discharged. Bump stocks don't change the weapon or the firing mechanism, they just make it easier/faster to operate the trigger.

[wimpydave]

Bumpstock Case Update w/ Michael Cargill | Supreme Court Oral Arguments!

[militaryandgun]

Did ATF Harass Michael Cargill Over Bumpstock Case?

[newestmusic]

(via bumpstock [tttwofour])

[docholt0000]

THIS SO CALLED GUN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION THINKS YOU AND I ARE STUPID !!!

THEY ARE BRINGING UP GARBAGE TO DIVIDE GUN OWNERS WITH INCOMPLETE FACTS AND HISTORY !!!

THEY ARE PRESENTING THINGS SELECTIVELY FOR THEIR OWN LEFTIST AGENDA !!!

THEY KNOW THE THE PROBLEM WITH THE ATF DIDN'T BEGIN WITH BUMPSTOCKS !!!

https://youtu.be/-GvBcY7nBTk?si=l2E7u2ZpVFZet9xc

#WRONG #ANSWER 

[militaryandgun]

"Bumpstock Case Headed to SCOTUS!" を YouTube で見る

[dronebait]