#bloggerstyles

[diaryofdom]

[camilatabora]

Returning to girlblogger roots

[9divine9]

I wish I was loved

I wish I was loved, unconditionally. through days when my energy sucks up a room with my blank eyes. through moments when I’m too scared to speak up for myself. through times when I want to speak my mind and instead keep quiet because I’m scared of being alone. through thoughts of wanting to run falling off a cliff when I can’t take it anymore. through my soft voice screaming to be heard when the winds push me off my feet.

I want to— love myself unconditionally. through days where i want to give up and yell at myself to do better, be better. I wish, I loved, unconditionally.

[cinnamon-irl]

vacation places📍🦋🤍🫧🦢🩵🌻🌿🧘🏼‍♀️

[fashionhubsworld]

“Chic Evening Ensemble: A Modern Take on Timeless Elegance”

"Explore this exquisite fashion ensemble featuring a chic black crop top paired with an elegant white skirt. Complemented by a sleek, polished hairstyle and minimalist jewelry, this look perfectly balances sophistication and contemporary style, ideal for an evening out or a stylish gathering."

[mineofilms]

Review of: "Poor Things"

Poor Things (2023) Writers: Tony McNamara, Alasdair Gray Directed by: Yorgos Lanthimos Stars: Emma Stone, Willem Dafoe, Mark Ruffalo, Ramy Youssef IMDB Rating: 8.3/10 Stars Rotten Tomatoes Audience Score: 79% Runtime: 2 hours, 21 minutes

Spoilers Ahead, You Have Been Warned... Plot:

A young woman brought back to life (Emma Stone) by a scientist named Godwin Baxter, who goes by just [God,] (Willem Dafoe). Under his care she is thirsty for knowledge and adventure. She runs off with a slick and debauched lawyer (Mark Ruffalo), on a mind-bending adventure across Europe. Free from the prejudices of her time, she grows resolute in her purpose to stand for sexual freedom, equality, and liberation. A quasi-retelling of “the Bride of Frankenstein” of sorts, with a few twists and interesting characterization. As all great movies have… Great characters… At the end of the day, movies are made for people by people about people. I think that is why many movies fail these days and why the super-hero genre business is as bad as most see them as far as quality of the story being told goes. $200 million to make a movie that is largely done in and by a computer. “Poor Things” had a budget of 35 million and at the time of this writing, made on its U.S. run 32.9 million.

The movie itself is fairly artsy in its aesthetic. Wide-angle approaches to shots, fish-eye type angles. Part of the movie is in black and white and the other part is of vibrant coloring. The dialog is pretty well crafted with lingo being of the times but closer to 1900 industrialism and some steampunk elements. The tone is childish at times playing on the feelings of Bella Baxter (Stone) as a woman trapped in the mind of a growing child but at an accelerated rate. The story takes a twist when Bella discovers sex and sexual curiosity. She realizes how little of life she has actually lived up to this point. God, has not allowed her off of his property and Bella craves to examine the world with her unique perspective, often literally portrayed through shots resembling the view through a front door peephole.

The film explores the boundaries of life, death, and societal norms. “Poor Things” is not easy to categorize, described by viewers as absurd, ridiculous, and strange. However, it captivates us with its exploration of these dated societal norms and intricacies of the time period it is trying to represent. The plot takes an unexpected turn revealing that Bella carries the brain of her unborn child. The film follows Bella's journey of discovery, from basic life skills to understanding societal norms and sexual liberation. Emma Stone delivers a standout performance, portraying Bella with unparalleled unpredictability. Mark Ruffalo adds a layer of humor to the narrative and is a scene stealer that will make most laugh. The film's R-rating is notable in an era where graphic content like this has been often toned down to get a lessor rating so that it can be seen in theaters by a larger audience. It fearlessly embraces its vision, presenting a violent and thought-provoking storytelling experience that is highly sexualized. This film, unapologetically committed to its vision, invites viewers to delve into its complexity, making it a journey that may not be for everyone, but certainly promises a unique and thought-provoking experience. “Poor Things” is based on Alasdair Gray's book of the same name. However, adapting a complex narrative like “Poor Things” is always a challenge, and I appreciate that the film stands on its own merits, even without having read the original book. Director Yorgos Lanthimos, known for his visually eccentric style, doesn't disappoint. The film transforms famous cities into absurd, otherworldly versions while capturing their essence.

The performances, particularly by Mark Ruffalo, Willem Dafoe, and Emma Stone, are exceptional. Stone's portrayal of Bella is as risky as it gets; yet a compelling performance, adding depth to a character discovering the world from scratch. The film offers a more human touch through Bella’s character growth and exploration. It's a dense, hilarious, disturbing, and heartfelt experience. “Poor Things” feels like a breath of fresh air, deserving multiple viewings. One of the film's standout features is its undeniable beauty. Shot on 35mm film, and uses more practical sets and visual effects, although there is CGI there. It is not as heavily used to create these fantastic visuals, but to enhance or fill up what they shot using practical effects on set. It creates a lush and rich atmosphere, combining classic historicism with vividness. The set design, portraying fantastical Victorian settings, is both outrageous and classical. The range in costume design adds another layer of postmodern flair, creating a visually stunning realm once the scenes in color start to show up later in the film.

“Poor Things” is more than just entertainment; it's a thinking film that encourages the audience to consider its underpinning politics of how women are seen during this time period, even though it is not a true period piece. The film is filled with literary references and symbolism, from “Frankenstein” to ‘Eve’ in “the Garden of Eden,” providing a multidimensional experience. Emma Stone's portrayal of Bella is exceptional, capturing the character's complexities. However, I acknowledge that the film diverges from the book in its characterization. While Bella in the film may display a more intense and unrepentant nature, it doesn't necessarily undermine the film's overall message. The differences in characterization provide a darker, more cynical perspective on human nature, contrasting with the optimism found in the original novel. Despite these changes, “Poor Things” remains a thought-provoking exploration of societal norms and the human condition. Its stunning visuals, coupled with strong performances. The sex scenes, while graphic, are still done tastefully and even comical in the brutal honesty of sexual gratification from an adult body with the maturity of a young child. Bella discovers sexuality and wants to share the bliss with everyone and doesn’t understand that sex is a complicated social barrier for most, especially in Victorian times. The film is cute like this all the way around and I am sure I will watch this again.

One of the oddities within the plot and characters is the backstory of who Bella really is. Why her body was chosen for resurrection and who Godwin Baxter really is? There is some dialog in the film and as I said I had not read the book but Godwin to me is Frankenstein’s Monster. Years later, the Doctor himself, has passed away. Has left everything to Godwin. God refers to the Doctor as his father and that he was heavily abused growing up. I infer this as the Doctor built Godwin. Was constantly attempting to make him better through very painful medical experiments. Only later in life did the Doctor treat Godwin as a human and then later a son. The one point that is shown down the board is the minds of the resurrected seem to have an aptitude for knowledge and experience. They want to learn and once they learn, well, how to learn, they tend to learn quickly and intently. By the halfway point of the film Bella has surpassed Duncan Wedderburn (Mark Ruffalo) in intelligence. This drives him slightly mad and full of jealously. By the end Duncan believes Bella to be a crazed manipulator that has bewitched him to ruin his life. It should be noted that Duncan manipulated Bella, due to her lack of knowledge of the world and being an attractive adult female to whisk her away to travel, make love and Duncan get drunk and gamble. When Duncan loses power over her, he cannot bounce back and it is quite satisfying to watch him descend into madness.

The movie does not linger on these backstories of Godwin, his father and the creation of Bella. They are mentioned to give some contextual meaning but I thought these were some of the more interesting pieces of the plot. All and all this is a beautiful film and a real whacky way to tell a story of growth, adventure and love from a growing woman’s perspective. Sort of coming-of-age story, but not in the same sense or tone as the coming-of-age films from the past. However, here, told in a really abstract, artsy and strange way.

Dr. Godwin Baxter: “My father once told me, "Always carve with compassion." He was a fucking idiot, but it's not bad advice.” Swiney: “We must work. We must make money. But more than that Bella, we must experience everything. Not just the good, but degradation, horror, sadness. This makes us whole Bella, makes us people of substance. Not flighty, untouched children. Then we can know the world. And when we know the world, the world is ours.” Bella Baxter: “I want that.” Swiney: “Now go and fuck someone and bring me ten francs.”

Review of: “Poor Things” by David-Angelo Mineo 3/2/2024 1,481 Words

[lagallery-art]

Nuevo blog de lagallery.art, conoce mas de la marca e inspírate a través de nuestros artículos, acá esta nuestro primer articulo del blog, en el siguiente link.

(vía Lagallery.art Una marca colorida)

[boogzel]

Aesthetic Outfit Inspo All Items except bag - from Boogzel

[azthemenet]

WordPress Theme Blog - WordPress Template - Vinyl A Lifestyle Blog Theme - Instant Digital Download - Free Installation and Setup Like Demo.

.

Download theme: https://az-theme.net/

.

#wordpress

#wordpressblogger

#wordpressdeveloper

#wordpresswebsite

#wordpressdesign

#wordpressblog

#wordpresstheme

#wordpressdesigner

#wordpressdevelopment

#wordpresshosting

#wordpressplugin

#wordpresstips

#wordpressthemes

#wordpresswebsites

#wordpresswebdesign

#wordpressphoto

#wordpressplugins

#wordpressblogs

#wordpresshelp

#woocommercewordpress

#wordpresscommunity

#wordpressexpert

#wordpressdevelopers

#wordpressbloggers

#wordpressseo

#wordpressbrasil

#wordpresswebsitedesign

#wordpresssupport

#wordpressmaintenance

#wordpresstraining

[womaneng]

Follow me on instagram 🙏 . There are very few people left before we become 120 thousand people. I want to be 128 thousand people until my September 13th birthday. 💖 ⬇️⬇️

http://instagram.com/woman.engineer

[diaryofdom]

Small minds can't comprehend big spirits. To be great, you have to be willing to be mocked, hated, and misunderstood.

[coolcrownlady]

Best Steps of Digital Marketing

In today's fast-paced digital world, firms must leverage the power of Internet marketing to effectively reach their target audience. Fuenix Media is a premier digital marketing firm that can assist your brand in growing in the world of digital media. In this blog article, we will guide you through the fundamentals of digital marketing with Fuenix Media, allowing you to maximise the value of your online presence.

Step 1: Establish Your Digital Marketing Objectives

Setting clear and quantifiable goals is the first step in every effective digital marketing strategy. Fuenix Media will work closely with you to understand your company goals, whether they be to increase brand awareness, drive website traffic, generate leads, or raise sales.

Step 2: Conduct Extensive Market Research

Fuenix Media will undertake extensive market research in order to design an efficient digital marketing plan. This entails researching your target audience, determining their wants and preferences, and comprehending the competitive environment. Fuenix Media can adapt marketing activities and language to engage with your audience and differentiate itself from rivals using this data-driven strategy.

Step 3: Establish a Strong Online Presence

In today's digital age, having a good online presence is critical. Fuenix Media will assist you with creating or optimizing your website to ensure it is user-friendly, visually appealing, and search engine optimized. They will also help you develop your brand's visibility on numerous digital platforms such as social media outlets, search engines, and industry directories.

Step 4: Create a Multi-Channel Marketing Plan

Fuenix Media understands the value of utilising several digital platforms to increase your brand's visibility. They will work with you to create a customised multi-channel marketing plan that may involve search engine optimisation (SEO), pay-per-click (PPC) advertising, social media marketing, email marketing, content marketing, and other services. This all-encompassing strategy guarantees that your brand reaches your target audience no matter where they are online.

Step 5: Carry out and monitor campaigns

Fuenix Media will start and oversee your digital marketing campaigns once the plan has been created. They will develop compelling content, optimize your website for search engines, administer social media accounts, and track key performance indicators (KPIs) to determine campaign success. The expert team at Fuenix Media will keep a close eye on everything.

[9divine9]

I’ve forgotten myself recently

I’ve forgotten myself recently, I lost who I wanted to be. Or maybe I’ve never known who I am.

I know my weaknesses. I’m quiet, tired, soft, gentle, fragile, and an observer of those opposite of that. I yearn to find the confidence that lies in being outspoken, energetic, proud, and stable.

Maybe one day, I’ll find myself.

[cinnamon-irl]

AUGUST AND RETURN 🌻🌾🍃🍹🌤🎐

[himanahu20-blog]

3 relationship

3 relationship that define almost everything that happens to us in our life. The relationship we have with money. The relationship we have with time. The relationship we have with ourselves. – Do Epic Shit ( Ankur Warikoo )

[mineofilms]

Sine Damno Educendi

I recently ran into a problem with how one of my video editing programs imports a specialized audio track, specifically engineered to deal with YouTube’s compression algorithm when you upload videos to the platform. It should be known that YouTube compresses both video and audio from its original sampling rate once a video is processed through the upload system. The program I was working with was Pinnacle Studio 24 from Corel. Some projects go smoothly. Others send you on a wild goose chase, digging through software settings, running test after test, and questioning your life choices. This is the story of the latter—a deep dive into the frustration of handling audio files and the long road to finding a way around limitations of how some software’s handle importing tracks. If you’ve ever imported a crisp, professional-grade audio track into a video editor only to have the final export sound dull and lifeless, you’re not alone.

This issue wasn’t immediately obvious. In fact, it took an outside ear to even catch it. An audio engineer—someone with a much sharper sense of sound than I have—noticed something was wrong. The higher frequencies, the "top end" of the audio, were being cut off in the final export. The mix sounded fine on my editing timeline, but something was happening during the rendering process. What followed was a multi-layered, 3-day, troubleshooting process, leading to some surprising (and infuriating) discoveries about how Pinnacle Studio handles audio tracks.

Step 1: Confirming the Problem:

The first clue that something was off came before I even uploaded the video to YouTube. The song, originally a rich and balanced .wav file, suddenly sounded like it had been run through a low-pass filter. The shimmer of cymbals, the brightness of the vocals, and the overall clarity were gone.

At first, I assumed it was YouTube’s infamous compression. It’s well known that YouTube processes uploaded videos with its own audio compression algorithms, sometimes reducing quality. But even playing back the exported file before uploading revealed the same issue—YouTube wasn’t the only problem. Pinnacle Studio itself was altering the audio. Both on the import into the program and the rendered export of the finished product.

Step 2: Checking the Import Settings:

One of the most overlooked steps in video editing is how your software imports media. Most people assume that dragging and dropping a file into the timeline means it stays in its original format. Unfortunately, that’s not always the case.

Pinnacle Studio doesn’t have the most transparent way of handling audio files. While it can work with .wav files, the way it processes them internally is another story. There was no obvious warning that my high-quality, uncompressed audio was being altered upon import, but I had my suspicions.

To test this, I tried playing the original .wav file outside of Pinnacle in a separate audio player. It sounded perfect. Then, I played the same file within Pinnacle’s timeline. It still sounded fine. But after exporting? That’s where the trouble began. The import settings are defaulted and cannot be changed directly for just an audio tract. One usually sets up the project parameters and Pinnacle will treat the files based on their presets on how one sets up the parameters. While no direct compression was detected. I went ahead and went into all the audio effects and made sure if anything was added automatically, that they were removed and the audio track was locked down after that. I do not know for sure if this does anything or not but I was able to delete some settings added to the track when I clicked on corrections. However, I believe nothing was added that made a direct difference. Only a placeholder for a change was in the settings and I just clicked on the garbage can to remove it in the case any changes were made. When I played the track before and then after I did not see or notice any changes. This made me think it had to be the output settings.

Step 3: Tweaking Pinnacle’s Export Settings:

If importing wasn’t the issue, maybe it was the export process. Pinnacle Studio 24 has multiple export presets, and many of them apply compression by default. By default, it exports in AAC audio format, which, while decent, applies lossy compression. Lossy compression is fine for casual videos, but not when you need to preserve the full depth of a professionally mixed music track.

I started tweaking settings.

First, I tried exporting in .mp4 with the highest available audio bitrate. No change.

Then, I tried different sample rates and bit depths. Still no change.

Finally, I tried exporting in .mkv, just to see if that made a difference. It didn’t. it actually crashed Pinnacle every time I tried to run the export as .mkv.

At this point, I was convinced that Pinnacle was doing something to the audio that wasn’t obvious in its settings. Pinnacle in general is a massive black hole on system resources on a windows computer. Memory (RAM), Graphics Card (GPU) are working so hard my whole system is almost crippled by the usage. I have an old computer and it’s very possible my installation of Pinnacle on this machine is too much a strain for the system to work as it’s supposed to work. I have to shut down most of my computer programs, and web browsers in order to run Pinnacle smoothly.

Step 4: The Hidden Culprit – Pinnacle’s Audio Presets:

Digging deeper into Pinnacle’s settings, I discovered something frustrating: Pinnacle Studio 24 applies audio compression and EQ settings by default. As I discussed before this was nice to find and know it was adding something to my audio track, but not enough to make that the main reason the problem existed in the first place. These aren’t listed as part of the export settings, but rather buried in the "Corrections" tab under audio adjustments.

There, I found an automatic preset subtly altering the sound. Deleting these presets improved the clarity, but the issue still wasn’t entirely gone. Pinnacle was still rendering the audio in a way that affected the high frequencies.

Step 5: A Workaround – Enter VSDC:

If Pinnacle wasn’t going to let me export a clean audio track, I needed another solution. That’s where VSDC came in. VSDC is a free, non-linear video editor that offers more control over export settings, especially for audio. Instead of fighting Pinnacle, I decided to take a different approach. I had been using VSDC a lot more than Pinnacle in the past few months. VSDC can do a lot of things Pinnacle cannot do. However, Pinnalce’s interface is a little easier to work with for this type of work. I have yet to really learn VSDC to a point where this is what I always use. I have been a Pinnacle Systems-guy since the year 2000. I have used many other PC-based editors but I always stuck with Pinnacle. Its only been recently that I have been using VSDC. I began using it for its audio spectrum abilities but then I learned VSDC have many options for exporting videos using different presets and being able to customize those presets in a much more refined and detailed way:

Export the video from Pinnacle Studio 24 with the best possible visual settings but accept the slightly degraded audio.

Import the exported video into VSDC and replace the audio track with the original .wav file.

Export the final version in VSDC using lossless PCM S16LE audio encoding.

This method allowed me to bypass Pinnacle’s internal audio processing while still using it for its video editing capabilities. The results? A massive improvement. The final export retained the original high frequencies and overall clarity of the song.

Step 6: Uploading to YouTube – The Final Test:

Even after fixing the problem on my end, there was still the matter of YouTube’s own compression. Some degradation is unavoidable when uploading to YouTube, but I wanted to minimize it as much as possible.

Through further research and testing, I found that YouTube applies less aggressive compression to videos exported in .mkv format with PCM audio. While .mp4 is the most common format for YouTube uploads, it often triggers heavier compression, especially on the audio side. By exporting in .mkv with PCM S16LE audio compression, I managed to retain far more of the original sound quality after uploading. The difference wasn’t night and day, but it was enough to be noticeable, especially to those with trained ears.

There were several triggers I needed to understand with how VSDC allows the user to edit its export settings. First, I had to choose this is an export for a computer file. Not necessarily, for YouTube or social media but an export for my computer. Second, I had to choose .mkv as the export settings. Third, I then could tweak the audio compression export settings. Doing it this way tells VSDC to unlock more encoders to choose from. When choosing say YouTube as an .mp4 it only allows AAC to choose from. What we wanted here was PCM. I cannot access PCM from the dropdown unless I choose the output as for my computer, as a .mkv, then I am able to choose PCM from choices of audio compression encoders. I could probably find a way to edit this so that I can use them all in any format-presets, but I am not nearly as crafty about this as I’d like to be. Plus, it’s of no real consequence here. The point is I needed to be able to export the video in full HD with this audio encoding feature in order to trick YouTube to not compress as much on this file over other uploads.

Final Thoughts – Lessons Learned:

This entire experience was a reminder of how complex audio handling can be in video production along with all the issues that can and most of the time will arise within a given project and the resource demands on one’s system. Even with high export settings, Pinnacle Studio applied hidden audio processing that degraded quality in ways I didn’t expect. Along with its limited control over specific output settings. It took three days of research, watching videos on the subject, having dialog with AI, trial and error, overnight renders, and format tests to pinpoint the problem—and the solution.

VSDC proved to be a critical tool for final audio processing, allowing me to replace the degraded track while keeping the video quality intact. YouTube also handled audio better with .mkv using PCM S16LE, which made a noticeable difference in the final upload. While I originally used VSDC as a workaround in this case, it’s clear this program is more modernized on how video and audio are handled inside the program, how the tools work with your system and efficient in handling certain tasks that Pinnacle struggles with.

This reinforced a simple truth: —no software is perfect. Pinnacle has served me well for decades, but its hidden processing, resource-heavy nature, and age of the software made this project more complicated than it needed to be. In contrast, VSDC runs smoother, is far less resource intensive, and allows me to keep multiple programs open without taxing my system. While my working knowledge of it isn’t strong enough to fully replace Pinnacle yet, I’ll been integrating it more into my workflow with smaller projects and will be using VSDC more moving forward. At the end of the day, video editing is as much about problem-solving as it is about creativity. Never assume your software is handling things exactly the way you want—test, experiment, and be ready to pivot. For now, the music video is finished, the audio is intact, and the lesson is learned.

Sine Damno Educendi Latin for: (Exporting Without Loss) by David-Angelo Mineo 3/16/2025 1,965 Words