#aseity

[the-masquerade-council]

Non-Introject/"Brainmade"/Aseity alter flag to go along with these

The colors are mostly based off of this flag. Teal is used because it's the opposite of the color I used for source on the introject, it also represents that some aseitys may still feels like they came from somewhere even without a direct source. The light purple is for memory, this was added to combat the idea that only introject have memories that did not happen to the body.

Partial Introject - Partial Factional Introject/Factive/Factroject* - Partial Fictional Introject/Fictive/Fictroject*

these were made just by overlaying the introject flags on the non-introject flag, and then shifting the colors around so they looked better.

*Partial Factive/Fictive can also refer to an alter that has both factional and fictional sources, or an alter that has many sources and one primary one. However these flags are just partial factives/fictives that are partial do to being partially non-introjects.

[mybeautifulchristianjourney]

by Jon Nielson | The doctrine of aseity tells us that God’s decision to create cannot be because of any deficiency in God. He didn’t need the universe in order to be happy. He wasn’t lonely without us! So, why create? God’s creation of the universe—and human beings—must be the abundant, joyful, gracious overflow of his goodness and kindness....

[the27percent]

📝 with anyone outta my cast you'd like!

A few potential options

I'm a sucker for Khett and Atieno at shows - probably dealing with some assholes, still trying to make some diy stuff - posters, stickers, or whatever.

Or maybe when Khett does take up returning to space as an intergalactic wanderer, they end up linking up while he's investigating a spot. Maybe the ruins of civilizations that Atieno had seen while it was living.

Not really an idea as much as Atieno being a very willing associate for musical infodumping. [maybe drag them into playing something again (implying there is musical aptitude there ..maybe). hmm]

Dek

Relentless questioning is something I would welcome any excuse for that to happen. Hell, they'd probably have some questions about his experience on the Aseity (as much as he's able to share that is )

It would be truly interesting to see Dek in the aftermath of the Aseity being destroyed, that would be a whole thing and I'm fascinated to see how that may play out.

[ikmenios]

Worn Mantle - Aseity (2022)

[exitpointbreaksbass-beats]

Exit Point Rave Breaks and Future Jungle Session #1: https://www.house-mixes.com/profile/Exit-Point/exit-point-rave-breaks-and-future-jungle-session-1.

[risingsouls]

@viopolis​ asked: 💭 - Your pick between Gohan & Nucleotide, or Turles & Dek!

Symbols for Headcanons || Open! 

Send 💭 for my muse’s first impression of yours.

[I think I’ve touched a bit on Gohan’s first impression of Nucleotide that basically would boil down to guilt and discomfort, so I’ll go with Turles and Dek.

In short, Turles would definitely be fascinated by Dek and the Aseity. Like sure he’s seen a lot of aliens and tech in his time, but he would be absolutely enthralled to learn anything and everything about him probably the moment he opened his mouth. Especially if Turles didn’t have any information on his kind (which I imagine he wouldn’t and it would drive him bananas). So basically, he would want to learn all the things about Dek and MIGHT try to recruit him to the Crusher Corps.]

[thinkingonscripture]

Life, Death, and Eternity

Life, Death, and Eternity

     God is life and creates life. Jeremiah said, “the LORD is the true God; He is the living God and the everlasting King” (Jer 10:10). Jesus declared, “the Father has life in Himself” (John 5:26). And the apostle Paul stated, “for in Him we live and move and exist” (Act 17:28). This teaching, that God has life in Himself and is self-existent, is called the doctrine of aseity. God exists…

[jonathanandrewkurz]

For anyone interested: I have updated my hymn that focuses on God’s aseity (self-existence). You can view/print at this link. 

It’s my prayer that this song encourages as it educates. Colossians 3:16 tells us that one purpose of our singing is to be ‘teaching and admonishing’ each other. I hope this hymn enables us to do so with awe, wonder, and thankfulness in our hearts to God.

The major update is a refrain of praise at the end of each verse. A dear friend pointed out that the whole song was listing attributes of God, but didn’t give the congregation an opportunity to celebrate and praise the God about Whom they are singing. Also, I tried to be less ‘reckless’ in my use of terms and ideas. I realized I was using a word in a different manner than it is defined. There is no place for the unclear, confusing, or haphazard in Christian worship. 

I have a new song or two in the works right now! Very excited to polish them up as best I can and share them with you shortly.

Soli Deo Gloria!

[wisdomfish]

Consider love, as an attribute of God. If God is a mere unity without Trinity, then what is the object of God's eternal love? Himself? But love in the fullest biblical sense by its very nature reaches out to another, not merely to the self. The world? Then God's eternal attribute of love depends on the world; it needs the world. On a Trinitarian basis, however, God's love is both interpersonal and self-contained: God's love is the love among Father, Son and Spirit for one another and it is not dependent on the world... The Trinity guards aseity, for without it, God is relative to the world. The Trinity also guards the personality of God: he is not a blank unity, which would be impersonal. Rather, he is unity of persons.

John M. Frame

Aseity: is the property by which a being exists in and of itself, from itself, or exists as so-and-such of and from itself.

[johnzande]

THE GREATEST RELIGIOUS QUESTION NEVER ANSWERED

Post dedicated to America’s Newest Best Worst Apologist, Mel Wild: senior pastor at the Cornerstone Church. It is the most conspicuous religious question never answered, and this simple brute fact should aggravate and needle every waking moment of every person who believes this world was created: Why did the Creator create? For what purpose was this artificial world intended? In the Christian…

[cherrwysx-music]

♫ Nexilva - Aseity: I ♫

[mybeautifulchristianjourney]

by Costi Hinn | The Latin phrase “a se” translates “from self” which is where the term “aseity” finds its roots. God’s aseity is one of the most unknown and underappreciated of His attributes. This attribute marks the difference between the Creator and His creation. It is linked to eternality in that He is an eternal being...

[madewithonerib]

Genesis 4:26 | And to Seth also a son was born, and he called him Enosh. At that time men began to invoke the name of the LORD.

to call upon,לִקְרֹ֖א (liq·rō) Strong's Hebrew 7121: To call, proclaim, read liq·rō — 20 Occurrences

Albert Barnes, American Theologian [1798-1870]

     A son is born to Sheth also, whom he calls Enosh.

     In this name there is probably an allusion to the      meaning of sickliness & dependence which belongs      to the root.

     These qualities were now found to be characteristic      of man in his present state.

     The closing sentence signalizes a remarkable event,      which took place at the birth of Enosh, about 240 years      after the creation of Adam.

     "Then was it begun to call upon the name of the LORD."

     The solemn invocation of GOD by HIS proper name in      audible & social prayer & praise is the most usual      meaning of the phrase now before us, & is to be      adopted unless there be something in the context      or the circumstances demanding another meaning.

     This involves also the first of the meanings given      above, as we call GOD by HIS name in oral worship.

     It includes the third in one of its forms, as in praise      we proclaim the name of our GOD.

     And it leads to the second, as those who call on the      name of the LORD are themselves called the      children of GOD.

     Some change is here intimated in the mode of      approaching GOD in worship.

     The gist of the sentence, however, does not lie in      the name "Yahweh".

     For this term was not then new in itself, as it was      used by Eve at the birth of Cain;

     nor was it new in this connection, as the phrase      now appears for the first time, & Yahweh is the      ordinary term employed in it ever afterward to      denote the true GOD.

     As a proper name, Yahweh is the fit & customary      WORD to enter into a solemn invocation.

     It is, as we have seen, highly significant.

           It speaks of the Self-existent One,            the Author of all existing things, &            in particular of man;

     the SELF-manifest, who has shown HIMSELF      merciful & gracious to the returning penitent,      & with HIM keeps promise & covenant.

     Hence, it is the custom itself of calling on the      name of Yahweh, of addressing GOD by HIS      proper name, which is here said to have      been commenced.

     At first sight, with our habits & associations, it      seems a very strange thing that calling upon      the name of the LORD should only begin      235 years after the creation of man.

     But let us endeavor to divest ourselves of these      limitations, & rise to the primeval simplicity of      man's thoughts in regard to GOD.

     We read of GOD speaking to man in paradise,      but not of man speaking to GOD.

     In the examination that preceded the sentence      passed upon the transgressors, we hear Adam      & Eve replying to the questions of GOD, but      not venturing to open a conversation with the      MOST HIGH.

     If the feeling of reverence & solemn awe did not      permit such a liberty before the fall, much more      would the super-added sense of guilt after that      event restrain man from making any advances      toward the infinitely HOLY BEING whom he      had so wantonly offended.

     The rebuking examination, the judicial sentence,      & the necessary execution of this sentence in its      preliminary form, were so prominent & impressive      as to throw into the background any intimations      of the divine mercy with which they were      accompanied.

     The latter, however, were not unnoticed, or      without a salutary effect on the primeval pair.

     Adam believed the indications of mercy, whether      in WORD or deed, which GOD gave him.

     Faith was prompt & natural in that early stage      of comparative nearness to GOD, to HIS      manifest presence & HIS conspicuous wonders      of creative power.

     It was also a native tendency of the human breast,      & would be so still, had we not become so      sophisticated by education that doubt has come      to be the prominent attitude of our minds.

     This faith of the first pair led to confession;      not directly, however, to GOD, but indirectly in      the names Adam gave his wife,       & Eve her first-born son.

     Here humble, distant, self-condemning faith      solilloquizes, or, at most, the penitent pair      converse in humble hope about the mercy of      the MOST HIGH.

     The bringing of an offering to GOD was a step      in advance of this penitent, humble, submissive,      self-accusing faith.

     It was the exact counterpart & representation by      a well-devised symbol of the nature of the      offerer's faith.

          It was therefore a confession of faith

          & certain accompanying           feelings toward GOD            by a symbolic act.

     It was quite natural that this mute sign should      precede the actual address.

     The consequences, however, of the approach      of Cain & Abel were calculated to deepen      again the feeling of dread, & to strike the onlooker      mute in the presence of the HIGH & HOLY ONE.

     Still would this be so in that infantile state of      man when one thought would take full      possession of the soul, until another was plainly      & directly brought before the attention.

     In this simple, unsophisticated state of the penitent,      we can conceive him to resign himself passively      to the merciful will of that MAKER whom he has      grievously offended, without venturing to breathe      a wish or even to lift up a note of thanksgiving.

     Such mute acquiescence in the divine will for      235 years was well-befitting the humble penitents      of that infantile age, standing in solemn awe under      a sense of their own demerit & of the      infinite holiness of the MAJESTY on HIGH.

     There were even an eloquent pathos & power      in that tacit reverence suited to move the heart      of the All-searching SPIRIT more than 10,000      voices less deeply penetrated with a sense of      the guilt of sin & the beauty of holiness.

     At length, however, Sheth was given to Eve, &      accepted by her as a substitute for Abel.

     Enosh, the child of sorrow, was born to him.

     Collateral with this line of descent, & all the      anxieties & desires which it involved, was the      growth of a class of men who were of the      spirit of Cain, & receded further & further      from GOD.

     In these circumstances of growing iniquity on      the one hand, & growing faith on the other,

     believing reason comes to conceive the full      import of the mercy of GOD, freely & fully      accepts of pardon, & realizes the peace &      privilege which it bestows.

     Growing man now comprehends all that is      implied in the proper name of GOD, יהוה      YEHOVAH, "YHWH," the Author of being,      of promise, & of performance.

     He finds a tongue, & ventures to express the      desires & feelings that have been long pent      up in his breast, & are now bursting for      utterance.

     These petitions & confessions are now made      in an audible voice, & with a holy urgency &      courage rising above the depressing sense      of self-abasement to the confidence of peace      & gratitude.

     These adorations are also presented in a      social capacity, & thereby acquire a public      notoriety.

     The father, the older of the house, is the      master of words, & he becomes the spokesman      of the brotherhood in this new relationship into      which they have spontaneously entered with      their FATHER in heaven.

           The spirit of adoption has prompted            the confiding & endearing terms,            "ABBA, FATHER,"

     & now the winged words ascend to heaven,      conveying the adorations & aspirations of the      assembled saints.

     The new form of worship attracts the attention      of the early world, & the record is made,

           "Then began they to call upon             the name of the LORD,

      WHO keeps covenant & mercy.

           Here we perceive that the holy race            has passed beyond its infancy.

     It has learned to speak with GOD in the language      of faith, of conscious acceptance, of freedom,      of hope, of love.

     This is a far nobler attainment than the invention      of all the arts of life.

     It is the return from that revulsive dread with which      the conscious sinner shrank back from the felt      holiness of GOD.

     It is the drawing of the divine mercy & love let into      the penitent soul, by which it has come to itself, &      taken courage to return to the merciful YAHWEH,

     & speak to HIM the language of penitence, of      confession, of gratitude.

     These believing penitents, chiefly it is to be      supposed in the line of Sheth, of which this      paragraph speaks,

           began to be distinguished as            the followers of the LORD;

     whereas others at the same time had forgotten      the LORD, & renounced even the form of      reverence for HIM.

     The seed of the woman was now distinguished      from the seed of the serpent.

     The latter are in a spiritual sense called      "the seed of the serpent," because they cling      to the principles of the tempter;

     & the former may in the same sense be      designated "the seed or sons of GOD,"      because they follow after HIM as the      GOD of mercy & truth.

     Thus, the lamentable fact obtrudes itself upon      our view that a portion of the human family      have persisted in the primeval apostasy,      & are no longer associated with their      fellows in acknowledging their      common MAKER.

     The progress of moral evil in the antediluvian      world was manifested in fratricide, in going out      from the presence of the LORD,

     in personal violence, & in polygamy.

     The first is the normal character of all murder;      the second gave scope for the third, the daring      & presumptuous violence of the strong;

     & the fourth ultimately led to an almost total      corruption of manners.

     It is curious to observe that ungodliness, in the      form of disobedience & departure from GOD &      therefore of the practical breach of the first      commandment, & unrighteousness in the form      of murder, the crime of masterful passion &      violence, which is the transgression of the      first commandment concerning our neighbor,      are the starting-points of sin in the world.

     They do not seem to have yet reached      idolatry & adultery.

     This appears to point out that the prohibitions      into which the law is developed in the      Ten Commandments are arranged in the      order of time as well as of nature.

     The preceding chapters, if written in substance      by Adam, formed the primeval BIBLE of mankind.

     But, whether written at that time or not, they contain      the leading facts which occurred in the early history      of man in relation to his MAKER.

     These facts were well known to the antediluvian      world, & formed the rule by which it was to be      guided in approaching to GOD, presenting to      HIM an acceptable offering, calling upon HIS      Name, & so walking with HIM in peace & love.

     Here we have all the needful germs of a      GOSPEL for the infantile race.

     If we ask why they were not effectual, the      answer is at hand.

     They were effectual with a few, & are thereby      proved sufficient to recover man from sin, &      vindicate the mercy of GOD.

     But the All-Wise BEING, who made man a moral      agent, must thoroughly guard HIS freedom,      even in the dealings of mercy.

     And in the folly & madness      of their self-will, some will      revolt more & more.

     The history was written for our learning.      Let its lessons be pondered.

     Let the accumulated experience of bygone      wanderings recorded in the Book of GOD      be our warning, to return at length with our      whole heart to our merciful FATHER.

Source: @hed___mee_ via @delta-breezes​

[oddinthetruth]

Essential Aseity and the Eastern Fathers

Scholar Nathan Jacobs argues that the Eastern fathers do not hold to a view of essential aseity. Now, given the predominance of essential aseity in much Western trinitarian thought, such a view might seem rather scandalous.

Jacob’s, on the other hand, sees it as simply an entailment of the Eastern fathers moderate realism. He supports his claim by way of contrast with the Eunomian view of natures.

The Eunomian case places the principle of existence in nature rather than subject. In other words, the Eunomian instinct is that existence...is essential to the divine nature. Hence, any subject having the divine nature has existence by virtue of being divine.

On the Eunomian view, the Son who is begotten and originate, cannot be of and identical with the divine nature, which is itself the principle of existence. Aseity is proper to natures and the Son, who is begotten, is not a se. He must be of a different nature than the having-no-cause-whatsoever (a se) Father. 

More than that, the Father must be “of a nature that is ontologically superior to that of the Son and the Holy Spirit--the Father being unoriginate (or a se), while the Son and the Spirit are originate (not a se).”

The Eastern fathers, on the other hand:

...being moderate realists, reject the point. Existence is never a property, accidental or essential, of natures. Existence is only ever located in subjects that give concrete reality to natures – hence their use of hypostasis, or that which exists underneath a nature.

He explains further:

...the Eastern fathers make clear that natures are mere abstractions that lack stability (stasis, playing on the term hypostasis) and thus require a hypostasis to supply concrete existence. This is why they also insist that the hypostasis is logically anterior to the nature. That is to say, the nature stands upon the individual, not vice versa. Put otherwise, individuals exist; natures subsist in individuals. And to be clear, the Eastern fathers do not make an exception for things divine.

This approach of the Eastern fathers has a startling implication:

Applied to the Trinity, this means that the Father exists a se (in himself); the divine nature subsists in the Father. Thus, there is no "essential aseity," since the divine nature does not (and cannot) exist in itself...Since aseity implies having no cause whatsoever, the term is applicable to the Father only, according to Eastern patristic thought.

This Eastern fathers’ view of natures and its application to the Trinity is what counters the Eunomian position that only the Father can be of the divine nature.

On the Eastern fathers’ view, because aseity is an incommunicable idiomata of the Father’s hypostasis, the begotten Son and spirated Spirit can both be of the divine nature.

In other words, the Son and Spirit can be both fully divine--fully identical to the divine nature--and yet remain begotten and spirated, respectively, while the Father alone is a se--”having no cause whatsoever.”

Using the logic that arises from their view of natures, Jacobs says the Eastern fathers push further into their disagreement with the Eunomian position:

The Cappadocians point out that the Eunomians commit a category error in this claim [the Father is ontologically superior because he is a se], confusing efficient cause (how a thing is) with formal cause (what a thing is). All three have the same nature but the Father has it from no one, while the Son has it by begetting and the Spirit by spiration. Just as Adam, Eve, and Abel have three different efficient causes (unbegotten of man, proceeding from Adam, and begotten of Adam) but share a common nature, and are thus ontological equals, so the divine hypostases differ in efficient cause (unbegotten, begotten, and procession) but share a common nature, being ontological equals [in other words, not subordinate].

Thoughts

If Jacob’s reading of the Eastern fathers is correct, it has important historical and theological significance for pro-Nicene logic and trinitarianism. 

Importantly, for my interests, this view also accords beautifully with the strong Monarchy of the Father view of the Trinity. The one God is the Father, the a se hypostasis. He is the source and cause of the Son and the Spirit (with all the appropriate qualifications, of course).

Additionally, because the Father is the principle of existence, not the divine nature, it is he that communicates his nature to the Son and the Spirit. They are identical to his divine nature. They are homoousios with him. The Father then is both the source of unity and distinction in the Trinity.

An important question is how might Jacob’s observation be understood in light of Western or Latin views that argue for the essential aseity of the Son? I’d love to hear from others on that question.

My only caution, as I’ve written about before, is that as this question is addressed that we not flatten or bend pro-Nicene trinitarianism so as to remake it in the image of current in-favor idioms. 

[anemcia]

//No prompt needed, but lately I’ve been wanting to express how much this community has impacted my experience positively and I want to take the time to give special shout-outs to those who make me smile when I see them show up:

@kiealer - Starting off strong with you, my dear. You’re genuinely one of the sweetest souls here and I care for you so, so much. Part of the reason I’m making this post is because you’re much too hard on yourself over things you can’t control. You’ve ruined nothing, and people are only weary because of what a shitty person did. Nothing to be done there and I have often prayed for your heart to be healed with time. One step at a time baby, I swear you are never alone in any of this. I can guarantee no one will give you issues over your comfort ship without getting instantly pistol whipped. NazuBlack IS CANON and you have every right to post headcanons, share shippy pics and gush as much as you like to whomever you want. Who the hell can tell you ‘no?’ YOUR CITY, YOUR RULES. 

We’re in the middle of a fantastic RP over discord (I NEED TO REPLY BTW, I DEEPLY APOLOGIZE FOR THE WAIT) and it’s made me realize I shouldn’t have to be so shy in gushing about CellDew, YOU helped me get a lot more comfortable in my skin, that is no exaggeration. I’m not here to force you to post anything, Kona, it’s how you feel and what you want to do. You deserve to be comfortable and feel fluffy goodness with your OTP, damn it don’t WE ALL? Guess I’m gonna have to knock your inbox down with prompts just because I want to feed into my fav ship around the block. You owe nothing to no one, don’t ever apologise for running your blog the way you want to. Be indulgent, make it known that NazuBlack is here to stay! Believe me, I’m not going to let anyone tell you otherwise without a size 12 boot up their ass. 

@saiyanandproud - Can I just say that I’ve been secretly a big fan of Mariko for well over a year? ;0; Sometimes get a little embarrassed over that fact, but our rp’s have really picked up recently and it’s making me thankful that we actually have a proper theme going on between our babies!! ;w; I love seeing all of Mariko’s little shenanigans on the dash with everyone, her personal relationships blooming while she herself is growing as a person with every thread I peek into. Like I’ve stated previously, for an OC based around a limited concept of being a time patroller, she really extends her reach past her occupation. Mariko is a well rounded OC who aspires for genuine recognition as a hero, even if she dares to fly a little too close to the sun. She’s nobody’s fool, incredibly straightforward and a fantastic friend. All that aside, you’re such a humble mun and I enjoy even just holding little conversations about our day or how you’ve been holding up. Seriously, I’m glad you’ve stuck around tumblr this long for us to write great stories together! I’m positive any veterans familiar with her would be so damn happy to see she’s as active as ever!

@viopolis - It started with my HUGE juicy eyes over the fact an actual Dr.Gero graced this community, but my Lord did I absolutely stay for your highly talented world building with Dek, Khett, Nucleo, and many more OC’s that deserve equal praise. I love digging into your posts involving the Aseity, what it means for everyone involved aboard the vessel and how it connects them together. I envy that level of dedication with story weaving, how it fits so perfectly even with canon characters like Cell-- oh MAN speaking OF HIM. You’re the only other person I’ve met who understands how green mean bastard bug functions without adding unnecessary traits to his personality. Your basically my Cell twin in that regard, some minor differences for sure, but generally on the same page. THAT, AND CLEO! MY ADOPTED GOTH SON. Each time I see his face is the moment I feel my arms wanting to hug the computer monitor, like... Wow, I love him just as much as I do Cyto and thats a lotta love. I certainly WILL NOT forget about Dek because they’re a mischievous alien CREATURA I wish to smoosh with my hands respectfully. Look I just... I really love all your muses dude, absolutely blessed to have a chance to interreact with any of them! Not to mention you yourself as a mun are VERY COOL AND SWAGGY, it’s nice to share ideas and squeal equally about it all. Again, massive props, you deserve every drop of it.

@risingsouls - You are the lady with FIREY LAZER OPINIONS and damn it Momo, I admire that energy. I love the passion you hold over Nabs, Vegeta, all the muses you carry tightly in your protective fist because YOU’VE WORKED SO HARD ON THEM. The beautiful amount of time you’ve placed into writing your story, how many chapters you’ve reached because YOUR PASSION is damn near unrivalled by the majority here. I envy you massively for having accomplished so much writing and character exploration the way you want to, like... I salute you baby, you’ve shown everyone here that your dedication for you precious babbies are not to be trifled with. On top of that, you’re generally a very chill mun to hang with and are open to playing games and having good times. OH, and of course when YA GOT THE TEA... ALWAYS HAPPY TO LISTEN. I know I’ve been major absentee lately, but I want you to know I’m always admiring near or far. I’m glad to know that despite everything, you truck on and push forward through all the shit you’re given. Momo the STRONG. Momo the inspiration. I NEED whatever juice you be sipping to get into gear and JUST... WRITE MY OFFICIAL CELLDEW STORY ALREADY.

@synthetixviola - Lets be real, you run one of the BADDEST BITCHES in this RPC. I love a baker who could kick my ass up and down the street and serve me a cake with “sorry u lost most of your teeth” written neatly in icing. I really got to know her through the awesome tournament Momo was running and I just... Love all her energy + bonus relatable mom moments. She’s a beauty, she’ll rip open someones asshole on a whim, she’ll sell you something nice on the side and be a wonderful example of how Gero ruined her life with the android shenanigans. I can’t blame her hate boner for the RR army, who really could in her position? No one can deny that Lila is a fantastic OC and I’m so happy that I can see her beautiful purple hair grace my dash when you post. Also, can I just say that you’re also so very cool and easy to chat with? Seriously, stay coolio because you’re one of the cooliest ;3c

@unboundpower​ - THE GREAT AND POWERFUL USER OF ACTUALLY VERY WELL WRITTEN FUSION FRIENDS, THANK GOD. Seriously Nebula, before you really made yourself prominent here was when there was some... Not so great Gogeta / Vegito / Four blogs kicking around and I can’t say it was terribly interesting. You have every right to gatekeep what you’ve built for yourself and your handsome boys, because you’ve fleshed them out so well that I don’t think many can match your energy. Give yourself credit where it’s due, you’re running characters that are a little more challenging to write and you do it so naturally. The complexities of being themselves, owning up to their own love lives as individuals, the break away from just being ‘fusions’ of Goku and Vegeta and BECOMING a new soul altogether. I’m so happy to see how far each lad has grown and I love seeing your shippy stuff with Nabs ;3c It’s just plain adorbs ya’ll, love to SEE IT. Plus you’re a sweet and cool mun who DESERVES hugs and pats for just being you! Also, HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY, apologies for not wishing that for you sooner!! I hope you’ve been having better days ahead!!

UMM I’D POINT THE CAMERA TO THOSE I HAVEN’T MENTIONED BUT YOU ALL ROCK IN YOUR OWN UNIQUE WAYS!! Seriously, you guys are what keep me coming back to this hellsite, it’s nice to see everyone enjoying themselves and having fun with one another in peace. It’s what I want to keep seeing as long as I’m around to witness the fun!​ Thanks for keeping this community sparkling, you’re very much appreciated for being here.