#and cannot in any meaningful way determine who if anyone was lying in this scenario
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
It's really funny to me that people are like 'Louis is an unreliable narrator you can't trust anything he says' right up until he says Lestat's version of Claudia's turning is probably the right one at which point he's correctly acknowledging his flaws and we have an absolutely canonical version of events. Like my dudes idk how to tell you this but Lestat is also not a reliable narrator. This is an adaptation of the unreliable narrator book series, where a bunch of queens have an unreliable-narrator-off to determine who the biggest unreliable narrator is, because they all think being an unreliable narrator is so sexy. If you want the objective truth go watch a documentary about rocks or something.
#the real version is probably somewhere in between those two versions#but we will never see it because this is the biased-secondary-sources show where the flashbacks are fake and the points don't matter#iwtv amc#original post#remember when daniel and louis both repeated the same words about the first interview#bc armand had planted the same lie in both their heads?#okay yes good are you still with me#now think about what that says about other people's versions of a story eclipsing your own memories#are we together on this?#okay now apply that to lestat's version of the story of claudia's turning#it's almost like.. say it with me.. we do not know the truth about what happened#and cannot in any meaningful way determine who if anyone was lying in this scenario#yippee! we got there together i'm so proud of you#sorry. also the biased primary sources show
5 notes
·
View notes